Accidents & Malfunctions Preparedness & Emergency Response

Similar documents
OVERVIEW OF PRESENTATION

NUNAVUT PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 2016 DRAFT NUNAVUT LAND USE PLAN BAFFINLAND IRON MINES PRE HEARING WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS

Operations Mine Site, Tote Road and Railway

Implementation of the Polar Code in Canada: Challenges and Opportunities

Shipping and Marine Wildlife Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK... 10

TRANS MOUNTAIN PIPELINE SYSTEM NORTHWEST AREA COMMITTEE MEETING SEATTLE, WA. 13 TH FEBRUARY 2013 MICHAEL DAVIES

TERMPOL Review Process Report on the Enbridge Northern Gateway Project

Transport Canada Marine Transportation in the Canadian Arctic Presentation to the International Maritime Statistics Forum

and Marine Spills Response Capability (June 1989) Protecting Our Waters Brander-Smith Report (Sept 1990) Partnership

TP OIL HANDLING FACILITIES STANDARDS

B.C. TOWBOAT INDUSTRY CONFERENCE

Task 10: Bunkering Accident Characterization

Regulations of the People s Republic of China on the Emergency. Prevention and Handling of Marine Pollution Caused by Ships

Waterways 1 Water Transportation History

NATIONAL CONTINGENCY PLAN FOR OIL POLLUTION PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE

FINAL REPORT: VTRA

Alaska Deep-Draft Arctic Ports Navigation Feasibility Study. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Bruce Sexauer P.E. Chief of Planning, Alaska District

Audit and Advisory Services Integrity, Innovation and Quality. Follow-Up Audit of Ship-Source Spills

Arctic shipping, opportunities and environmental implications

National Contingency Chapter Section 4 - Canadian Coast Guard Response Management Structure

Trends in Technology Development for Marine Spill Response. Chantal Guénette CANADIAN COAST GUARD - ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE

Maritime Rules Part 19: Maritime Transport Operator Certification and Responsibilities

Risk mitigation - it s all about the human element. Commodore David Squire, FNI Editor Alert! The Nautical Institute

ECRC~SIMEC. Cooperation beyond borders. A Canadian response organisation perspective. Pierre Samson Region manager

Environmental Management in Oil Spills

DOCUMENT REVISION RECORD

A REVIEW OF CANADA S SHIP-SOURCE SPILL PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE:

ECRC~SIMEC Canada's Marine Oil Spill Preparedness Regime

SingClass Courses are practical application courses and are meant for: Course Title

Port of Long Beach Port Master Plan Overview December 22, 2008

Mitigating Environmental Impacts in the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry

The Enel Vetting system Shipping Safety and Marine risk assessment

~ BRIEFING NOTE ~ BC Land-Based Spill Preparedness & Response Framework Recommendations December 2013

Certificates, Documents & Publications.

ICMI International Cyanide Management Code Consigner Supply Chain Summary Audit Report

National Oceans Consultations Workshop on Sustainable Development Goal 14

Potential hydrocarbon and chemical spill

EPA Issues General Permit for Vessels

ADAPTATION SYMPOSIUM Nicole Legault Environmental Policy Directorate Transport Canada

Norwegian Coastal Administration

LOADING OF BULK LIMESTONE AT MUSANDAM ANCHORAGE

Summary of PTTGC Oil Spill Incident and Execution

Public Meeting. NEPA Environmental Review Process. To seek comments on the Draft EIS

Marine Protection Rules Part 100 Port Reception Facilities Oil, Noxious Liquid Substances and Garbage

November 17. Brochure.

Maritime Safety Committee s 89 th Session

Oil & Gas, Environmental, Regulatory Compliance, and Training

TANKER SAFETY ISSUES. Mr Paul Markides Director OCIMF

Oil Spill Response. October 2006

SHIPPING COMPANY ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE MEETING TMSA REQUIREMENTS

ANNEX 1 DRAFT RESOLUTION MEPC.140(54) Adopted on 24 March 2006

Ship to Ship Transfer (POAC/Superintendent) for Liquefied Natural Gas and Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LNG or LPG) (3 days) (OCIMF)

This electronic edition is licensed to for 1 copy. International Maritime Organization

Woodfibre LNG Limited Response to SIGTTO LNG Ports and Risk Reduction Options

Oil Spill Preparedness and Response

Current Status of Oil Spill Response in Japan and a New Sensible Approach to the Issues

RESOLUTION MEPC.213(63) Adopted on 2 March GUIDELINES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SHIP ENERGY EFFICIENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN (SEEMP)

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR VESSELS BOUND FOR OR LEAVING PORTS OF THE BALTIC SEA STATES AND CARRYING DANGEROUS OR POLLUTING GOODS

Washington State Ferries Liquefied Natural Gas Project

OUR GOAL IS TO PREVENT SPILLS ENTIRELY

Guidelines for Reporting Incidents Involving Dangerous Goods, Harmful Substances and/or Marine Pollutants

Financial Resources Human Resources Assets

DOWNSTREAM PETROLEUM 2017 DOWNSTREAM PETROLEUM

ICMI International Cyanide Management Code Summary Audit Report. Intermarine, LLC - Industrial Terminals Initial Certification Audit

1 Abstract. 2 Norwegian contingency today

Rail Service at Brookley Aeroplex

Commodity Preparedness and Incident Management Reference Sheet Pre-Incident Planning and. Preparedness. 1.0 Pre-Incident Planning and.

Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Consolidated Application Volume 7: Construction and Operations. Section 5 Marine Operations 5.0 MARINE OPERATIONS

A MODAL COMPARISON OF DOMESTIC FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION EFFECTS ON THE GENERAL PUBLIC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. November 2007

Carriage of Dangerous Goods and Harmful Substances

PRECIOUS SHIPPING PUBLIC CO., LTD. ( PSL )

Safety & Security. Introduction. Chemical transportation. Chemical transportation risk management. Resources. Chemical Transportation

Scoping Document for the Environmental Assessment. BP Exploration (Canada) Ltd. Tangier 3D Seismic Survey

Appendix A: Project Characteristics

Canada s Marine Spill Preparedness and Response Regime the HNS outlook!

FAQ S Frequently asked questions from our customers.

Heavy Intermodal Lift & Transport Engineering Considerations

BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE 2 DECEMBER 2015 INTERNATIONAL WORKBOAT SHOW 2015 NEW ORLEANS, LA

Dry Cargo Re-supply Programme

IUCN ISRP FOLLOW UP WORKSHOP OIL SPILLS

Panama Canal Shipboard 1. Oil Pollution Emergency. Plan (PCSOPEP) Requirements. OP NOTICE TO SHIPPING No. N PANAMA CANAL AUTHORITY (ACP)

OIL POLLUTION EMERGENCY PLAN

CURRICULUM VITAE SCOTT RICHARD MOFFITT Master Mariner

Energy Efficiency EEOI

EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE FIELD AND TABLE- TOP EXERCISES (GIURGIULESTI, REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA, 2 SEPTEMBER 2015)

Safety of LNG-Shipping around Ports and Terminals

GNWT Marine Assets and Operations

On Board Regasification for LNG Ships. 22 nd World Gas Conference WS 3-2 Tokyo 2003 Wayne Perry

BUILDING AN INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT CHAIN NORILSK NICKEL

Ship to Ship Transfer POAC/ Superintendent Crude Oil, Chemicals and Petroleum Products (Bulk Liquids) 3 days

Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Spill Preparedness and Response Initiatives

Aim of BSR LNG Competence Center

Draft. Environmental Assessment Guidelines (including the Scope of the Environmental Assessment)

Recognizing that pollution of the Caspian Sea by oil and by oil pollution incidents of the sea threatens the marine environment,

COMMENTS. AgTC Position Paper: Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) Container Weight Documentation

TECHNICAL CHALLENGES ASSOCIATED WITH ARCTIC LNG DEVELOPMENTS: A CLASS SOCIETY APPROACH

IMPORTANCE OF MARPOL, LIABILITY & COMPENSATION CONVENTIONS IN THE CARIBBEAN. Cayman Maritime Conference 2017

ANNEX 1. RESOLUTION MSC.325(90) (adopted on 24 May 2012)

Electronic Chart Display and Information Systems for navigational safety in maritime transportation

Transcription:

Accidents & Malfunctions Preparedness & Emergency Response

2 Erik Madsen Michael Anderson Michael Zurowski Fernand Beaulac Tim Keane Panel Members

3 Prevention Preparedness Training Exercises and Testing Incident Reporting and Learning Commitment to Safety Continual Improvement

4 Safety Across All Operations All locations mine site, port, rail Consideration of risks from accidents and malfunctions addressed in Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) Significant emphasis on shipping related accidents particularly related to the potential for oil spills Additional analysis related to overwintering fuel Railway operation emergencies

5 Shipping Focus For This Panel: Marine risks associated with accidents and malfunctions as it relates to the transport and storage of fuel: Ship-to-shore transfer of fuel Overwintering of fuel vessel at Steensby Inlet Shipping route Preparedness and emergency response for marine incidents and spills Risk for transboundary impact of a fuel spill along the shipping route Railway Preparedness and emergency response for railway accidents and malfunctions

6 Key NIRB Issues: Issue (e) Potential for accidents and malfunctions associated with proposed marine transport and storage of bulk fuel, including overwintering of fuel vessel and emergency preparedness Issue (i) potential for transboundary impacts associated with proposed shipping activities

7 Shipping Regulatory Framework The regulatory framework to ensure marine safety and to protect the marine environment for shipping in Canada includes: Canada Shipping Act (2001) Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act (AWPPA, 2001) Marine Liability Act

8 Shipping Regulatory Framework The Canada Shipping Act and Regulations govern: Ship design and construction (including double-hull requirement for fuel tankers) Ballast water management Pollution control Emergency response and preparedness Crew qualifications Navigation safety Part 8 of the Canada Shipping Act and its regulations address marine oil spill preparedness and response regime

9 Shipping Regulatory Framework The Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act and Regulations include additional protection for the Arctic environment: Construction standards for ships including ice breaking capability Shipping safety control zones Bans on discharge of oil, hazardous material and garbage Requirements for vessels to carry insurance addressing civil liability Vessel control systems for safe operation in ice conditions, including vessel design and having an experience ice navigator on board

10 Shipping Regulatory Framework The Marine Liability Act contains provisions respecting liability for spills including: Requirement for vessels to carry insurance to pay damage for oil spills, and, Provision for liability

11 Shipping Regulatory Framework The written submission of Transport Canada and the submission of the Canadian Coast Guards provide more details of these regulatory requirements and the oversight and enforcement role of Transport Canada and other federal agencies. Transport Canada is the lead federal agency responsible for the National Marine Oil Spill Preparedness and Response Regime.

12 Approach Compliance with regulatory requirements Focus on prevention Ensure reliability and safety of installations and equipment Bulk fuel storage and fuel handling facilities Ore carriers (Polar class 4 ) Navigational safety Fuel tankers double-hull Suppliers and operators with Arctic experience and expertise Effective management plans in place Emergency response team

13 Effective Management Plans EH&S Framework and Risk Assessment (FEIS Volume 10) Management plans evolve over time Emergency Response and Spills Contingency Plan FEIS Appendix 10C-1 Guidance from Emergency Response Work Group Oil Pollution Emergency Plan (OPEP) for oil handling facilities FEIS Appendix 10C-2 & 10C-3 Transport Canada review and approval on annual basis Ship Oil Pollution Emergency Plan (SOPEP) Transport Canada approved Specific to each vessel navigating in Canadian waters

14 Emergency Response Team (ERT) All employees undergo formal safety and emergency response training Emergency Response Team on site at all times trained in emergency identification and accepted response action techniques Emergency Response Team (ERT) training Practical Comprehensive annual exercises External expert organizations to assist in delivery of training External organizations and community representatives will be invited to participate in the training and field exercises.

Ship-to-Shore Transfer of Fuel Preparedness and Emergency Response Addressed in FEIS Volume 9, Section 3.5 Fuel spill modelling presented in Appendix 9A and 9B During construction ship-to-shore fuel transfer by floating hose method (method used for all Arctic communities) Fuel tankers have a Ship Onboard pollution Emergency Plan Effective spill prevention measures have been identified and will be implemented for ship-to-shore transfers Oil Pollution Emergency Plan for Oil Handling Facilities is reviewed and approved by Transport Canada on an annual basis Fuel transfer only when weather conditions permit Once freight dock is constructed fuel unloaded at dock 15

Ship-to-Shore Transfer of Fuel Preparedness and Emergency Response Three types of fuels delivered to ports Arctic diesel, jet fuel and marine diesel Fuel spill modelling carried out for both Milne Port and Steensby Port Modelling based on spill of arctic diesel Assumes worse case scenario (5 ML spill) without intervention Modelling based on currents information and wind data Considers fate and persistence of fuel spill on water Purpose of modelling is to identify trajectory of fuel slick on water and environmentally sensitive areas of coast line Useful tool for the planning of emergency response strategies for spill event Up to 90% of trajectories expected to reach shore line in less than 4 hours 16

Ship-to-Shore Transfer of Fuel Preparedness and Emergency Response Response for spill Emergency response team on site and prepared to respond when fuel transfers occur Response equipment located at each port Boats (work boat and tugs) available and ready for rapid deployment of containment booms Skimmer, barge and other recovery equipment located at each port Effective response and deployment of spill containment within an hour of spill occurrence Small fuel spill during ship-to-shore transfer will quickly be contained and the environmental effects resulting from such an incident will not be significant. The risk associated with ship-to-shore transfer of fuel is considered low. 17

Steensby Port Area Overwintering of Fuel Vessel 18 Rationale to support early construction activities Strategy to support early construction activities It will require up to two years to construct the onshore fuel storage required by the project Risk assessment has identified risks and mitigations measures to ensure safe operation Submitted for review on May 15 th 2012

Steensby Port Area 19 Overwintering of Fuel Vessel The vessel will comply with all regulatory requirements Double hulled, Polar class 1a vessel Operational plans for this practice have been submitted for review No fuel off-loading during the shoulder season

20 Overwintering Vessel Description Essential characteristics: Ice class 1A or higher Double hulled, Segmented compartments Vessel must carry full complement of spill control gear and the crew must be trained in its use Vessels will meet all requirements of the Arctic Waters Oil Transfer Guidelines - TP 10783 E and also have a Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan (SOPEP)

Primula Used at at Hope Bay 21

Steensby Port Area 22 Concerns: Overwintering of Fuel Vessel Integrity of the vessel Polar class 1a vessel Spill of fuel under ice no transfer during shoulder seasons; one transfer per month over ice during winter months Emergency response for vessel on board incidents (SOPEP and OPEP) Transport Canada s review has determined that the Proponent s plan meets regulatory requirement Risk analysis identifies low to medium risk no high risk components have been identified Practice of overwintering has been used successfully in Nunavut as well as NWT Hope Bay Project

Risk Assessment of Fuel Spill 23 at Port and along Shipping Route Accidents & malfunctions addressed in FEIS Volume 9, Sections 3.6 Ship engine failure at sea (possible; moderate risk) Ship grounding (unlikely; low risk) Ice /ship interaction (likely; low risk) Collision with other vessels (rare; low risk) Also discussed in Volume 9, Section 3.8 Large diesel spill at sea (possible; low risk)

Risk Assessment of Fuel Spill 24 along Shipping Route Final Environmental Impact Statement concludes that risk of a spill event is low. Risk assessment work shop held on June 18 th, 2012 Attended by representatives of shipping companies, Transport Canada, Coast Guards, DFO and Environment Canada Concluded that risk of a spill along shipping route is unlikely with prevention measures in place and strict adherence the rules of the road for shipping

25 Prevention Measures Ship Master s responsibility to navigate with caution Transport Canada requires any tanker built after 1993 to be double-hulled to operate in Canadian waters Vessels have anti-collision devices with alarms and radar to ensure that collisions are avoided. Marine heavy oil (IHO) used for powering the ship is stored within a double tank containment inside the ship, away from the hull. IHO storages are unlikely to be damaged by collision or grounding. Ore carriers Polar class 4 vessels Fuel tanks are located within double skin within the vessel Marine diesel tank capacity contained in at least six storage tanks.

26 Prevention Measures Vessels are equipped with several dual/redundant back up systems Engines Radar Navigational systems Communication systems Shipping lane bathymetry is known Bathymetric surveys done for a 6 nautical mile width along shipping corridor Hazards and environmentally sensitive areas along shipping route have been identified Shipment of bulk fuel during the open water season Suppliers with Arctic experienced and expertise with Arctic navigation

27 Rules of the Road for Shipping Shipping operators must abide by the established regulatory framework Ships must sail within the established shipping corridor (1.5 km within the 6 nauticle mile width where bathymetry is known) Ships must have a Ship Oil Emergency Response Plan (SOPEP)

28 Preparedness and Emergency Response Capabilities at Port Site Emergency Response Team at Steensby site Two ice management vessels equipped with necessary spill response/containment equipment Additional response equipment at Steensby Response along shipping lane Ship is the first responder (SOPEP) Discussions are underway with a certified response organization (R.O.) to develop strategies for response

29 Risk of Transboundary Effects FEIS Volume 9, Section 3.8.11 and Appendix 9C Coastal Ocean Resources Inc. Worse case scenario 5ML spill without containment or response action Diesel persistence is relatively short Weathering 90% of the fuel likely to be weathered within 96 hours Worse case persistence is one to two weeks Size of fuel slick on water Highly probable that a spill will be largely confined to a 15 km swath on each side of the spill location Shore line within 15 km swath may be impacted Shore line outside 15 km swath unlikely to be impacted

30 Risk of Transboundary Effects The southern shipping route enters eastern Hudson Strait, passes the community of Cape Dorset and turns northward in Foxe Basin: The preferred route is north of Mills Island closest distance to Cape Dorset is 24 km The alternative route passes south of Mills Island distance of 20 km from the Nunavik Settlement boundary and the islands of Nothingham and Salisbury Risk of transboundary effects is low

31

Summary Shipping Preparedness and Emergency Response 32 Risk of a spill is low Bulk fuel tankers are double hulled Ore carriers are Polar class 4 vessels with internal double skin fuel storage tanks Ship owner/operator have Arctic experience and expertise State of the art navigational systems on ships Well defined shipping lane and known bathymetry Preparedness and Emergency response Ships will have Transport Canada approved SOPEP Baffinland will have Emergency Response Team and response equipment on shore at Steensby and Milne Two ice management vessels equipped with emergency response equipment Contract with certified Response Organization (R.O.) for response and clean up for spills Transboundary effects of spill - Very low risk

33 Railway Regulatory Framework Federally regulated railway Requirement for: Certificate of Fitness Authorization to construct and operate a railway under article 98 of the Canadian Transportation Act The regulatory framework for railway safety encompasses the legislation, regulations, rules, and, engineering standards that provide the structure in which railway companies can operate safely. Relevant rail safety legislation, regulations, rules, engineering standards, policies and guidelines presented in Transport Canada s submission Appendix B

34 Prevention Measures Compliance with regulatory requirements and guidelines BIM will develop a Railway Safety Management System BIM will give Notice and Approval of Railway Works in accordance with regulation In accordance with Railway Safety Act, BIM will file rules and engineering standards with the Minister Compliance with Transportation of Dangerous Goods Railway Maintenance Management Plan Draft presented in FEIS Appendix 10D-9.1 Recommendations made by Transport Canada will be incorporated Railway Emergency Response Plan Draft presented in Appendix 10D-9.2 Recommendations made by Transport Canada will be incorporated

35 Prevention Measures Dangerous goods transported Bulk arctic diesel and jet fuel in tanker cars All other dangerous goods in appropriate packaging within sea container Operating practices Fuel tanker cars add two to four tanker cars to the return train to Mine site Railway speed limited to 30 to 40 km/hr Railway tanker car design Regulations and Canadian Standard

36 Railway Accidents & Malfunctions Risk of a spill is low Prevention measures, mitigations and management plans in place to minimize risks Railway Emergency Response Plan Emergency Response Team (ERT) and emergency response equipment located at Mine Site and at Steensby External expertise to assist in training of ERT ERT is trained and knowledgeable First response Safety of personnel Secure site / containment Respond as weather conditions safely allow