HUMAN RIGHTS EXPECTATIONS TOWARDS COMPANIES

Similar documents
Human Rights Policy. 1. Introduction. Rabobank Group

A SURVEY OF STATE CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY POLICIES AND THEIR RELEVANCE TO BUSINESS AND HUMAN RIGHTS

CLIMATE CHANGE STRATEGY EXPECTATIONS TO COMPANIES

NBIM Investor Expectations: Water Management

PRINCIPLES ON HUMAN RIGHTS

Quality, trust and social commitment. CaixaBank's Human Rights Policy. May 2017

II. General Policies

SABMiller Human Rights Policy

Group Policy - Freedom of Expression in Telecommunications

MAKING HEADWAY IN EUROPE

ELECTROLUX WORKPLACE CODE OF CONDUCT

Our Supplier Code of Conduct

RESPECTING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES: ANZ S APPROACH TO O HUMAN RIGHTS 1 October 2016

As if you were not confused enough already?

Roche Position 1 on Respecting Human Rights

NN Group N.V GRI Index table, Progress reports to the Principles for Sustainable Insurance and the UN Global Compact. NN Group N.V.

Policy on Employees & Human Rights

SANTANDER GROUP GENERAL POLICY HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY

Business Principles. Business Principles

IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES FOR THE PRINCIPLES ON FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND PRIVACY

V. Employment and Industrial Relations

Code of Human rights & social principles. Effective from November 2017

Realizing the UN Global Compact Advanced 2017

HUMAN RIGHTS UPDATED JULY 2018 GLOBAL POLICY

Groupe PSA Responsible Purchasing Policy

CONTENTS PREFACE 3 1. THE PURPOSE OF THE GRI SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING GUIDELINES 5

Code of Human Rights & Social Principles OTE Group

Code of Human Rights & Social Principles OTE Group

The Commodities Trading Sector. Guidance on Implementing the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Draft for Public Consultation

Supply Chain Social and Environmental Responsibility Code of Conduct

Position statement Danske Bank September 2018

The Business Principles of Alfa Laval

The SKF Code of Conduct

Statement from Civil Society Regarding Japan s National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights

G8 Labour and Employment Ministers Conference. Shaping the Social Dimension of Globalisation. Dresden, 6 to 8 May Chair's Conclusions

G8 Labour and Employment Ministers Conference. Shaping the Social Dimension of Globalisation. Dresden, 6 to 8 May Chair's Conclusions

Mars Human Rights Policy

Atlas Copco AB UN Global Compact Communication on Progress Advanced level reporting

Global Reporting Initiative Index

GROUP HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY

Cargotec Supplier Code of Conduct. Rev Page 1 of 5

Linking the GRI Standards and the European Directive on non-financial and diversity disclosure

2017 GRI CONTENT INDEX

POLICY ON HUMAN RIGHTS INDUSTRIA DE DISEÑO TEXTIL, S.A. (INDITEX, S.A.)

UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights

Vesper Group 2015 Global Compact Communication on Progress (COP)

Increasing the visibility of workforce issues in company corporate governance

Anheuser-Busch InBev Global Responsible Sourcing Policy

Proposal. Act amending the Danish Financial Statements Act

World Bank s Safeguard Policies Review and Update Labour expert group

Singtel/Optus Group Supplier Code of Conduct (SCC)

ICS Codes of Conduct 2018

Miro Forestry Company Policies & Procedures

Societal Impact & Sustainability Policy

ALTRON POLICY MANUAL

OUR HUMAN RIGHTS STANDARDS

the policy can be viewed at

Vice Mayor decision: 3/2012 Our reference:

Linking G4 and the UN Guiding Principles

HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY OF SIEMENS GAMESA RENEWABLE ENERGY, S.A. (Text approved by resolution of the Board of Directors dated September 12, 2018)

Responsible Procurement Policy

City Clock Kenya Limited Communication on Progress Year 2012

ATLAS COPCO ANNUAL REPORT SUSTAINABILITY INFORMATION 2016

Sustainable Development Management System (SDMS) Sustainable Development Policies

PwC UK and the Modern Slavery Act

Reference tool on Social & Labour Management Systems for Suppliers

Labour Standards Assurance Policy

BIO DIVERSITY POLICY Textile, Acrylic Fibre & Overseas Spinning Business

Anti Human Trafficking and Modern Slavery Policy

CAFOD and CEREAL Feedback on the draft Guidance for the ICT industry on implementing the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights

Recommendations Regarding the Revision of the UK s National Action Plan on the UN Guiding Principles

FOLKETRYGDFONDET S EXPECTATIONS. Guidance for companies on the handling of corporate governance, environmental and social issues

Avenir Digital Limited HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY

Ratos AB Adopted by Ratos s Board on February 2018 (replaces previous version adopted 16 February 2017)

SHELL PENSIONS TRUST LIMITED RESPONSIBLE OWNERSHIP POLICY & PROCESSES

SOCIAL, ETHICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CODE OF CONDUCT

Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement for Financial Year ended 30 th June 2016/17

Papua New Guinea LNG Project

The Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations

The Board of Directors of Forise International Limited (the Board ) is pleased to present our inaugural Sustainability Report.

Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights Galp Energia 2017 Annual Report

RESPECTING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES 1 September 2012 ANZ S APPROACH TO HUMAN RIGHTS

ISO and OECD Guidelines. Practical overview of the linkages

Human Rights Policy. The Company applies the principles of the Human Rights Policy to all stakeholders, including:

Employee Human Rights policy standard

Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Supplier Code of Conduct

Foreword. 1. Implementation Procedure. 2. Working Hours, Wages and Vacation Entitlement. 3. Discrimination. 4. Child Labor and Forced Labor

France Telecom Orange Group Sourcing & Supply Chain

1. Is the proposed definition of modern slavery appropriate and simple to understand?

Business and society. 93% of CEOs believe that sustainability issues will be critical to the future success of their business

MODERN SLAVERY AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING STATEMENT 2017

United Nations Global Compact Communication on Progress 2015

Our understanding of sustainability in supplier management. Occupational health and safety. Environmental protection. Conduct towards employees

2015 CPSU/CSA POLICY CONFERENCE GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT

"MECATRACTION Supplier Code of Conduct"

The Gunnebo Code of Conduct

GUIDELINE GUIDANCE ON THE HUMAN RIGHTS DUE DILIGENCE STANDARD

Page. LBMA & RJC Responsible Gold Forum OECD Due Diligence Implementation Iris Van der Veken, Manager Corporate Affairs Global 3 September 2013

Code of Conduct. Collective guidance for everyone at SEMIKRON. Our principles of conduct.

Transcription:

HUMAN RIGHTS EXPECTATIONS TOWARDS COMPANIES

The purpose of this document is to broadly set out the ways in which Norges Bank Investment Management, as a financial investor, expects companies to respect human rights, and address human rights issues in their business practices. Our expectations are primarily directed at company boards and intended to serve as a starting point for our interaction with companies on the topic of human rights. Boards should understand the broader environmental and social consequences of business operations, and must set their own priorities and account for the associated outcomes. In line with the OECD Principles for Corporate Governance we expect company boards to take into account the interests of all relevant stakeholders. Boards should ensure that the company has a policy to respect human rights and that relevant measures are integrated into corporate business strategy, risk management and reporting. Strategies for responsible business conduct should follow the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights, where applicable. Boards should ascertain that the ensuing responsibilities are clearly defined within the organisation and they should effectively guide, monitor, and review their management in carrying out these efforts.

Human Rights Norges Bank Investment Management is responsible for managing the assets of the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global. We work to safeguard and build financial wealth for future generations. Norges Bank Investment Management will, as a starting point and where appropriate, base its practices on internationally recognised standards such as the UN Global Compact, the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights, the OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. PURPOSE OF THE EXPECTATIONS The purpose of this document is to broadly set out the ways in which Norges Bank Investment Management, as a financial investor, expects companies to respect human rights, and address human rights issues in their business practices. Our expectations are primarily directed at company boards and intended to serve as a starting point for our interaction with companies on the topic of human rights. RELEVANCE OF HUMAN RIGHTS Norges Bank Investment Management s point of departure for our human rights expectations is our investment mandate and long-term financial objective of safeguarding the fund s assets. The fund is a financial investor and diversifies its investments across a large number of markets and securities. Norges Bank Investment Management will, through responsible investment management practice, promote good governance and well-functioning, legitimate and efficient markets. The long-term legitimacy of sectors and markets depends, among other things, on operations and products that are ethically acceptable. Companies operations have impact on employees, as well as contract workers, workers in supply chains, customers, communities and the environment around operations. End-users of products or services may also be affected by companies. It is broadly accepted that companies have a responsibility to respect human rights, including in supply chains and other business relationships. Respecting human rights is, more generally, part of good business practice and risk management. Under international law, the legal obligation to protect human rights rests with governments. Although international human rights treaties do not impose direct legal obligations on business enterprises, they nevertheless constitute important standards for companies. The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights refer to the responsibility of corporations to respect the human rights expressed in the International Bill of Human Rights 1 and the core ILO conventions, 2 as a minimum. These encompass economic, social and cultural rights, civil and political rights, and the fundamental principles and rights at work. 3 1 The UN Declaration on Human Rights of 1948, the two Covenants on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and on Civil and Political Rights, of 1966. 2 The core ILO Conventions pertaining to forced labour, child labour, freedom of association and collective bargaining, and discrimination. 3 The UNGP states that other standards dealing with specific or collective rights may also apply to business enterprises, depending on the context. A comprehensive list of rights and how they might be relevant to business enterprises can be found at: http://www.ungpreporting.org/resources/how-businesses-impact-human-rights/ Norges Bank Investment Management Expectations to Companies Children s Rights Strategy 1

The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights establishes a normative starting point for companies strategies with respect to human rights. The guiding principles moreover provides a reference point for businesses in understanding what human rights are; how their own activities and business relationships may affect them; and how to ensure that businesses prevent or mitigate the risk of adverse impacts on human rights. 4 The responsibility to respect human rights applies to all companies. It is the duty of companies themselves to decide how and to what extent the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and other relevant principles and guidelines apply to their operations. In practice, certain human rights will likely be more at risk of being impacted than others, depending on sector, geographical area and other circumstances. Our expectations are especially relevant for companies with direct operations, supply chains or other business relationships in highrisk sectors, high-risk geographical areas, or otherwise high-risk operational environments. In line with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, Norges Bank Investment Management encourages companies to identify the human rights, which may be at risk of the most severe negative impact through a company s business operations, 5 including in supply chains and other business relationships, as well as products and services. Norges Bank Investment Management acknowledges that information on human rights can be sensitive, both to operations and for affected stakeholders. We nevertheless encourage companies to be transparent, as far as possible, about the dilemmas they face and priorities they set in their efforts to respect human rights. Companies may find the comply or explain principle helpful in this regard. Principles and practices for companies human rights reporting have been developed over time. 6 We support the on-going development of good practices. Appropriate and timely reporting, as well as measurable data, are important in this regard. Norges Bank Investment Management uses such information to identify how the issue of human rights may affect companies performance and prospects, and to assess whether companies are taking adequate steps to develop a long-term business strategy addressing these challenges. EXPECTATIONS TOWARDS COMPANIES Boards should understand the broader environmental and social consequences of business operations, and must set their own priorities and account for the associated outcomes. In line with the OECD Principles for Corporate Governance we expect company boards to take into account the interests of all relevant stakeholders. Boards should ensure that the company has a policy to respect human rights and that relevant measures are integrated into corporate business strategy, risk management and reporting. Strategies for responsible business conduct should follow the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, where applicable. Boards should ascertain that the ensuing responsibilities are clearly defined within the organisation and they should effectively guide, monitor, and review their management in carrying out these efforts. 4 The UNGP concept of human rights due diligence concerns risk management processes in order to identify, prevent, mitigate and account for how a company addresses its adverse human rights impacts. It will vary in complexity with the size of the business, the risk of severe human rights impacts, and the context of operations. 5 Often referred to as salient human rights issues, see http://www.ungpreporting.org/key-concepts/salient-human-rightsissues/ 6 The 2015 UNGP Reporting Framework is one example. The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines another. In some jurisdictions companies are also required to report on human rights issues. 2

A. Integrate human rights considerations in business strategy and planning Companies should make a public commitment regarding the respect of human rights, including with regard to supply chains and other business relationships. Companies should adopt strategies and policies based on emerging industry standards and good practices addressing human rights. Strategies and policies should be appropriate to company size, sector, operational context, ownership and structure. 7 B. Integrate human rights into risk management Companies should conduct ongoing human rights due diligence, based on the perspective of those who may be negatively impacted. They should strive to identify actual and potential negative impact on relevant human rights in relation to all aspects of a business operation. Human Rights due diligence efforts should be guided by the severity of the potential adverse impact on human rights and practical considerations such as company size, sector, operational context, and business structure. Companies should understand the business implications of human rights issues and integrate findings within their strategic business planning. Companies should regularly consider whether their remuneration, incentive systems, and wider company culture integrate sustainable business practices appropriately. Employees and contractors must be made aware of company strategy and policies. Companies should consider putting in place a mechanism for third-party expert input into their human rights strategies and policies. This should not replace appropriate internal processes, roles and responsibilities. Company policies should include measures to address salient 8 human rights risks, including, as appropriate, through cessation, prevention and mitigation of potential human rights abuses. 9 Companies should carry out relevant impact and risk assessments prior to for example making significant investments in new business activities, agreeing mergers and acquisitions, entering into new countries, regions or locations and establishing new business relationships. Companies should have an adequate supply chain management system in place, including policies for detecting and preventing supply chain human rights abuses, monitoring systems, contractual clauses, incentives and corrective instruments, such as formal or non-formal education and training. 7 Strategies and policies can be integrated with wider corporate responsibility strategies on, for example, ethics, human rights or sustainability. 8 For an explanation of saliency, see http://www.ungpreporting.org/key-concepts/salient-human-rights-issues/. 9 As laid out in the UNGP appropriate action will vary according to whether a company causes or contributes to an adverse impact, or is involved solely because the impact is directly linked to its operations, products or services by a business relationship. The extent of a company s leverage in addressing the adverse impact may also be relevant. Norges Bank Investment Management Expectations to Companies Children s Rights Strategy 3

C. Disclose strategy, and report on human rights Companies should publicly disclose their human rights strategies, policies and processes and report on their implementation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and other relevant international standards. Companies should, where relevant, for example, disclose human rights action plans, governance structures, operational procedures and risk and impact assessments, as well as stakeholder relations concerning human rights. Companies should identify, monitor, and, at the appropriate level of detail, report status of such topics. Performance reporting should, as appropriate, use metrics that enable yearon-year comparison, in line with applicable internationally accepted reporting standards or initiatives. Companies should disclose information, at the appropriate level of detail, on their activities in high-risk sectors and geographical areas, or otherwise high-risk operational environments and, as far as possible, be open about dilemmas they face and priorities they set. Companies should ensure information is communicated in a relevant and accessible manner. As appropriate, companies should report the above information for supply chains and other business relationships, taking a full value-chain perspective. D. Engagement with stakeholders and grievance mechanism Companies should, as appropriate to their size, and the nature and context of operations, consult and engage with their workers and their representatives, health and safety representatives, potentially affected groups, and other relevant stakeholders, on human rights issues. Companies should establish or participate in effective and accessible operational-level grievance mechanisms for individuals and communities that may be adversely impacted by their operations. Companies should, where relevant, have policies or guidelines for engaging constructively with policy-makers and regulators on human rights and be transparent about those policies and guidelines. 4

NORGES BANK INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT Bankplassen 2, P.O. Box 1179 Sentrum, NO-0107 Oslo, Norway T: +47 24 07 30 00, www.nbim.no