Water Quality-Chlorophyll A Correlations Across Five Lakes

Similar documents
Chlorophyll a concentrations in Otsego Lake, summer 2003

Water Quality Analysis of Lakewood Lakes

Gary Fahnenstiel RECENT CHANGES IN PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY AND PHYTOPLANKTON DYNAMICS

Chlorophyll a analysis of Otsego Lake, Summer 2001

2018 Sebago Lake Assessment

After the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha, was first discovered in Lake St. Clair in 1988 and rapidly spread throughout the Great Lakes, broad

BLACKSTONE LAKE WATER QUALITY TESTING 2016

Chlorophyll a concentrations in Otsego Lake, summer 2014

Chlorophyll Training. If you registered for Chlorophyll-- - get your equipment NOW from Jean (out in the hall) before the training starts.

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH FORUM

Lake Washington. Water Quality Assessment Report. Copyright 2012 PLM Lake & Land Management Corp.

White Lake 2017 Water Quality Report

Interpreting Lake Data

Interpreting Lake Data

The relationship between physical characteristics and a specific algal community on the Moore Feature in Douglas Lake.

Long-term Water Quality Trend Analysis on Black Lake Thanks to Volunteer Monitoring Efforts

STATE OF THE LAKE Environment Report 2012 JOES LAKE

Long-Term Volunteer Lake Monitoring in the Upper Woonasquatucket Watershed

AP Environmental Science

5 - Chlorophyll Analysis Lab.

Biological Oceanography

STATE OF THE LAKE Environment Report 2012 MISSISSIPPI LAKE

Water Quality Monitoring for Lake Erie and the Great Lakes Nutrient Initiative (GLNI)

Water Quality of Seneca Lake

The Lake Partner Program

AP Lab 12--DISSOLVED OXYGEN & AQUATIC PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY (LabBench)

8 LITTLE CROSBY LAKE RESULTS

Effect of Turbidity on Dissolved Oxygen in the Lake Macatawa. Watershed

Water Monitoring in Spa Creek: A Summary

Comparison of Total Phosphorus in Lakes in Kalkaska County, Michigan and Relation to Trophic State

Cultural accelerated by anthropogenic activities

Freshwater Responses to Nitrogen and Phosphorus Pollution and a Case Study of Cutler and Dingle Marsh Wetlands

2017 Water Quality Report and Historical Analysis. Long Lake Mickey Lake Ruth Lake. Monitoring Years

Lake Elsinore and San Jacinto Watersheds Authority. Canyon Lake Phase 2 Water Quality Monitoring Plan

Light and the Aquatic Ecosystem

DRAFT. DRAFT July 9, 2013 Lake-Wide Survey (No. 8) Page 1 of Cayuga Lake. Lake-Wide Seabird Profiles

LAB. LAB BENCH DISSOLVED OXYGEN & AQUATIC PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY

EUTROPHICATION PHENOMENA IN RESERVOIRS

Chlorophyll a and phytoplankton surveys of Cranberry Bog, Burlington, NY, summer 2009

Ellis Pond Productivity Lab

Ploof s Creek South. Johannes Creek. Grand Lake, Ploof s Creek South, Johannes Creek. Introduction

What factors affect life in aquatic ecosystems?

STATE OF THE LAKE Environment Report 2013 MACKAVOY LAKE

Nutrient Issues in Lake Ontario. Lisa Trevisan Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change

Comparing the Dissolved Oxygen, Nutrient Levels, Macroinvertebrates, and Chlorophyll A Levels of Burt Lake and Douglas Lake

STATE OF THE LAKE Environment Report 2013 KASHWAKAMAK LAKE

EUTROPHICATION. Student Lab Workbook

LAKE PARTNER PROGRAM. Report Card 2015

STATE OF THE LAKE Environment Report 2012 CLAYTON LAKE

BIOLOGY TAHOE.UCDAVIS.EDU

2016 Summit Lake Water Quality Report Prepared by Thurston County Environmental Health Division

WALTON COUNTY COASTAL DUNE LAKES WATER CHEMISTRY SUMMARY 2016

Lesson Overview 4.5 Aquatic Ecosystems

Ecosystem Consulting Service, Inc. July 15, P a g e

Effects of ionic liquids on respiration in freshwater lakes

STATE OF THE LAKE Environment Report 2009 BUCKSHOT LAKE

CBF Water Quality Interactive Map

Understanding Lake Data

Assessing Lake Clarity...from SPACE...

Think About It (not on notes)

St. Lucie Estuary: Analysis of Annual Cycles and Integrated Water Column Productivity

Again, thanks for interest in this project. Please let me know if you have any questions, and I look forward to working with you.

Hubbard County Water Quality and You Celebrating 20 Years of Water Quality Testing in Hubbard County!

4/28/2013. Transmission of Light in Seawater. Color in the Ocean Color of ocean ranges from deep blue to yellow-green Factors Turbidity from runoff

UCMR4 Cyanotoxins. What Will You Do If You Find Them? Keith W. Cartnick AWWA PA Annual Conference 2019

Lake & Watershed Resource Management Associates P O Box 65; Turner, ME

Marine Primary Productivity: Measurements and Variability

Recent changes in Lake Erie Trophic Status? Jan J.H. Ciborowski University of Windsor & Gerald Matisoff Case Western Reserve University

CLMP+ Report on Grass Lake (Anoka County) Lake ID# CLMP+ Data Summary

Nutrient Response to Sewage Abatement in Hong Kong

2018 WATER QUALITY MONITORING BLUE MARSH RESERVOIR LEESPORT, PENNSYLVANIA

a) Temperature b) Light c) Decomposition d) Mixing/Turbulence e) Salinity

Portage Lake Hubbard County

A SHORELINE ALGAL SURVEY OF TORCH LAKE, CLAM LAKE AND LAKE BELLAIRE

State of the Lake Environment Report December Mackavoy Lake

Date: August 16, Upper South Long Lake Association c/o: Dan Martonik 9999 Leisure Lane Brainerd, MN 56401

Abstract. Rebecca K. Cecala 1, Christine M. Mayer 2, Kimberly L. Schulz 3 and Edward L. Mills 4

This article is provided courtesy of the American Museum of Natural History.

Dead-Zones and Coastal Eutrophication: Case- Study of Chesapeake Bay W. M. Kemp University of Maryland CES Horn Point Laboratory Cambridge, MD

THS Sci-O Water Quality Tryout Test. Partner 1: Partner 2: Total Score: /104

Hadlock Pond, Washington Co., Lake Hadlock Association, Inc.

Effects of Zebra Mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) Colonization on Water Quality Parameters in Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron

EUTROPHICATION. Teacher s Manual

Portage Lake CASS COUNTY

Izabela Zgud, Adam Sokołowski, Maciej Wołowicz

Predicting algal bloom dynamics in a changing climate

Okanagan Large Lakes Water Quality Monitoring Program Ellison Lake Wood Lake Kalamalka Lake Okanagan Lake Skaha Lake Osoyoos Lake

Climate Change Impacts on the Biology of the Pelagic Zone of Lake Tanganyika

Eastman Lake Town of Irondequoit Monroe County

Nutrient Limitation of Phytoplankton By Nitrogen and Phosphorus: Erosion of the Phosphorus Paradigm

Tina Laidlaw US EPA 1

Red Rock Lake: A Path Forward

Nitrogen and Phosphorus Enrichment Effects on Nutrient Supply in Reservoirs: a Small-Scale Approach

Nitrogen Cycling, Primary Production, and Water Quality in the New River Estuary. Defense Coastal/Estuarine Research Program (DCERP)

Harmful Algal Bloom Research at Stone Lab: Monitoring Blooms and Determining. Drivers of Bloom Toxicity

Classification of systems. Aquatic Ecosystems. Lakes 9/9/2013. Chapter 25

GOALS 1 1. PLANKTON SAMPLING 2 1A. ZOOPLANKTON VERTICAL NET TOW 3 1B. PHYTOPLANKTON NET TOW 4 1C. PHOTOSYNTHESIS & RESPIRATION: BOTTLE INCUBATIONS.

CITIZEN MONITORING AS WATERSHED MANAGEMENT TOOL. Reesa Evans Lake Specialist Certified Lake Manager Adams County LWCD

Monitoring Update April 1, Northeast Aquatic Research George Knoecklein Hillary Kenyon Sabina Perkins

Transcription:

1 Water Quality-Chlorophyll A Correlations Across Five Lakes By Taylor Forrest and Dan Klarr Rivers Lakes and Wetlands (EEB 30/ENVIRON 311) Summer 011

Abstract Water samples and water clarity measurements were collected from five lakes of differing trophic status located in northern Michigan (Douglas, Burt, Mullet, Black, and Crooked Lakes) during peak algae production to test the hypothesis that chlorophyll a concentrations will correlate with water clarity depth. Water clarity was measured using a secchi disk; the depth reported was the mean of three separate trials per lake in one location. A photometer (Li-Core photometer Li-19sa) was used to measure light penetration at each sample site to a depth of approximately 1 meter below secchi disk visibility. Water samples were taken at meter intervals to the depth previously established by the Secchi disk. Only one lake, Burt Lake, was found to have a significant correlation between light penetration and chl a concentration; no other lakes had a significant correlation. We recommend that further investigation be conducted on the relationship between algal biomass and zebra mussels due to their possible influence on water clarity. Introduction: Correctly evaluating trophic status of lakes is important to understanding the health and water quality of our lake ecosystems. Trophic status can be artificially influenced by anthropogenic causes such as increased nutrient loading. Excess of nutrients, particularly nitrogen and phosphorous, can cause premature eutrophication of lakes resulting in significant increases in algal biomass (Smith et al. 1999). Eutrophic lakes are characterized by high nutrients, high algae biomass and productivity, and shallow photic zones (Dodds 00). These differ greatly from oligatrophic lakes which are defined by low nutrients, low algae biomass and productivity, as well as deep photic zones (Dodds 00). Due to these characteristics, water clarity is greatly influenced by phytoplankton abundance and should differ greatly between oligotrophic and eutrophic lake systems due to their differences in algal biomass.

3 Chlorophyll a (chl a) is a photosynthetic pigment found in all photosynthetic organisms including all algae making it an excellent proxy for determining algal biomass (Wetzel 001). Many studies have shown that an increase in algae substantially influences water depth clarity. Swift et al. (006) found that increased algal biomass contributes greatly to reduction in water clarity. Our study predicts that chl a concentrations will correlate with water clarity depth. This relationship will vary among the trophic status of lakes. Oligotrophic lakes should have higher clarity with lower chl a concentrations and Eutrophic lakes should show a decreased clarity and high chl a concentrations leading to lower water clarity. Methods Water samples and water clarity measurements were collected from five lakes of differing trophic status located in northern Michigan (Douglas, Burt, Mullet, Black, and Crooked Lakes) (see figure 1) during peak algae production, that is during 10 a.m. to p.m. daily. Water clarity was measured using a secchi disk; the depth reported was the mean of three separate trials per lake in one location. A photometer (Li-Core photometer Li-19sa) was used to measure light penetration at each sample site to a depth of approximately 1 meter below secchi disk visibility. Using a Van Dorn water sampler, water samples were taken at meter intervals to the depth previously established by the Secchi disk. These samples were placed in 50 ml plastic sample bottles that were pre-rinsed with lake water and stored on ice in a cooler then transported back to the lab. At the lab, samples were refrigerated until time of analysis. Chl a concentrations were determined. Analysis of chl a consisted of filtering 60 ml (or more) of each water sample. Filter paper used that collect algae were placed in glass viles with 10mL of 90% acetone and placed in an ice bath for approximately 15 minutes. Samples were then placed in a freezer for a minimum of

4 4 hours before fluoresced in a Fluorometer TD-700. Before acid was added, measurements were taken; and then measurements were taken again after 3 drops of 1M hydrochloric acid was added to the acetone viles. Statistical Analysis The data gathered from all five lakes were then statistically analyzed and chloraphyll A concentrations were compared to degree of water depth clarity and light penetration measurements. This was done using a linear regression. Results After running linear regressions on data from all lakes, using log transformed light concentrations as the independent variable and chlorophyll A concentrations as the dependent variable, we found only one significant correlation. This was at Burt Lake (p = 0.04, R = 0.533). All other lakes did not show significant results or high repeatability (p > 0.3 R < 0.15) However, Crooked Lake, though insignificant, showed a very high R (0.957). Discussion: Only one lake, Burt, was found to have a significant correlation between light penetration and chl a concentration. No other lakes had a significant correlation, though it should be noted that Crooked had a very high R value. We also expected the highest chl a concentration to be at the surface of the water and then decrease with light visibility. In some lakes we found this to be true, but two lakes (Douglas and Burt) did not show this pattern. Mullet, Crooked, and Black Lakes all had peak chl a concentrations at the surface. We attempted to visit a variety of lakes in Northern Michigan with diverse characteristics like nutrient value, beach development, and size. However, due to time constraints we were limited to a sample size of five, which limits the significance of our data, as well as possible inferences we can make about lake systems as a whole. Also, the practice of taking secchi disk depth in each lake and then sampling water at meter intervals down to secchi depth proved

5 ineffective. While the secchi disk provided an insight into water clarity, only measuring chl a and light concentration to the secchi depth did not provide many data points and therefore our regression analyses may not have the same level of significance if we had probed deeper into the lake. We speculate that some of our results were insignificant due to the presence of zebra mussels in the majority of the lakes sampled. Because they are filter feeders, zebra mussels reduce the amount of chl a in lake ecosystems and can affect trophic status (Qualls et al. 007). Peak algal biomass is expected to be near the surface of the water due to light availability for photosynthesis. However, we did not often find this pattern in our data and we speculate it is due to the presence of zebra mussels. Lowe and Pillsbury (1995) found that with increases in zebra mussel density, water clarity increased as well as benthic algal blooms. Presence of zebra mussels in many of our study lakes may be responsible for unexpected peak in algae at some depth and explain the patterns we observed in our study. In Burt Lake where the regression analysis proved significant, light and chlorophyll a were correlated; however, in oligotrophic lakes where zebra mussles had altered the nutrient structure of the lake, the correlation between light penetration and chl a concentration was absent or insignificant. While this study provides insight into the strong effects of zebra mussel populations on the trophic status and nutrient composition of lakes, we recommend that further investigation be conducted on the relationship between algal biomass and zebra mussels due to their influence on water clarity. The influence of zebra mussels on water clarity and trophic statuses of lakes provides further support of the importance of evaluating the water quality of our lake ecosystems.

6 Literature Cited Dodds, WK. 00. Freshwater Ecology. San Diego, California. Espeland EM, Francoeur SN, Wetzel RG. 001. Influence of algal photosynthesis on biofilm bacterial production and associated glucosidase and xylosidase activities. Microbial Ecology. 4: 54-530. Lowe, RL. Pillsbury, RW. 1995. Shifts in benthic algal community structure and function following the appearance of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) in Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron. Journal of Great Lakes Research. 1: 558-566. Qualls Theresa M, Dolan David M, Reed Tara, et al. 007. Analysis of the impacts of zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha, on nutrients, water clarity, and the chlorophyll-

7 phosphorus relationship in lower Green Bay. Journal of Great Lakes Research. 33: 617-66. Smith VH, Tilman GD, Nekola JC. 1998. Eutrophication: impacts of excess nutrient inputs on freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems. Environmental Pollution. 100: 179-196. Lake p value R Burt Lake 0.040 0.533 Black Lake 0.677 0.104 Crooked Lake 0.133 0.957 Mullet Lake 0.666 0.111 Douglas Lake 0.391 0.14

8 Figure Legend: Table 1: Results Figures 1-5: Benthic maps of lakes visited Figures 6-11: correlations between chl a and light intensity (log transformed) in our lakes

9

10

11

1

(for units see legend) 13 Douglas Lake 8 7 Chl a mg/l 6 5 Light (micromols) 4 3 1 0 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 depth (meters)

(See legend for units) 14 8 Burt Lake 7 6 5 4 3 Light (micromols) chl a mg/l 1 0 1 3 4 Depth (meters) 5 6 7 8 9

(See legend for units) 15 Black Lake 8 7 6 5 4 3 Light (micromols) chl a mg/l 1 0 1 3 4 5 6 7 Depths (meters)

(See legend for units) 16 Crooked Lake 8 7 6 5 4 3 Light (micromols) chl a mg/l 1 0 1 3 4 5 Depth (meters)

(see legend for units) 17 Mullet Lake 8 7 6 5 4 3 Light (micromols) chl a mg/l 1 0 1 3 4 5 6 Depth (meters)