OVERVIEW. What is the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement?

Similar documents
Binational Action to Restore the Great Lakes

Renewal of the Canada-United States Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement

Canada-Ontario Agreement. on Great Lakes Water Quality and Ecosystem Health

LAKE HURON LAKEWIDE ACTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN

GREAT LAKES CONSIDERATIONS

Hamilton Harbour. Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010

Lake Erie LaMP Nutrient Management Strategy Lake Erie Millennium Network April 27, 2010 Windsor, ON

Detroit River. Area of Concern Canadian Section. Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010

Peninsula Harbour. Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010

Protecting Lake Erie By Managing Phosphorus: Lake Erie Binational Nutrient Management Strategy

Nutrient Management Strategy for the International Red River Watershed. Collaborating Across Jurisdictions to Improve Water Quality

Jackfish Bay. Area in Recovery Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010

Working under the Updated Agreement: The Great Lakes Restoration Initiative. National Conference on Ecosystem Restoration July 31, 2013

The Alliance for the Great Lakes

Community Action Programs for the Environment

RECOMMENDED BINATIONAL PHOSPHORUS TARGETS TO COMBAT LAKE ERIE ALGAL BLOOMS

Great Lakes Roundup. Lake Erie Environmental Forum 4/14/2017

RECOMMENDED BINATIONAL PHOSPHORUS TARGETS TO COMBAT LAKE ERIE ALGAL BLOOMS

INFRASTRUCTURE SPOTLIGHT: THE GREAT LAKES AND ST. LAWRENCE WATERSHEDS

Pennsylvania Lake Erie Phosphorus Reduction Domestic Action Plan (DAP) June 15, 2017

Responsible Mining in the Lake Superior Basin Dec. 2013

Registration is free, however, space is limited! To register and for more information on the Great Lakes Public Forum, please click here.

Renegotiation of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement

Findings of the IJC Nearshore Workshops

Data Sources and Methods for the Park Ecological Integrity Indicator. October 2012

Governance Challenges to Addressing Algal Blooms in the Great Lakes

PHYSICAL INTEGRITY: IMPACT OF URBAN AREAS ON GREAT LAKES WATER QUALITY

Data Sources and Methods for the Release of Toxic Substances to Water Indicators. July 2013

Charter: Great Lakes Region Aquatic Habitat Connectivity Collaborative

Canada-Ontario Domestic Action Plan for Lake Erie Phosphorus Reduction. Agriculture Sector Working Group April 19, 2017

The adequacy of the Agreement to accommodate present and future stressors that impact Great Lakes water quality.

Annex 4 Nutrients Great Lake Executive meeting June 24 25, 2015

Ballast Water, Aquatic Invasive Species, and the Great Lakes. Molly M. Flanagan Vice President, Policy

How is the story being told? The importance of appropriately synthesizing data and information

Great Lakes Economic and Environmental Review

International Lake of the Woods Basin Water Quality Plan of Study Your comments are invited! November 12 - December 11, 2014

CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ASSOCIATION L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DU DROIT DE L ENVIRONNEMENT

Data Sources and Methods for the Water Availability Indicator. December 2012

LAKE ONTARIO WATERS: NEW CONCERNS REQUIRE A NEW PLAN. Presented by NYSDEC on behalf of The Lake Ontario Partnership February 13, 2019

Overview on Green Infrastructure Actions within the Draft Canada-Ontario Action Plan for Lake Erie

Jon W. Allan, Director Office of the Great Lakes

A Multijurisdictional Approach in Managing the Aquatic Invasive Species Problem in the Great Lakes

IJC Science Advisory Board Science Priority Committee Seventh Meeting Teleconference Meeting Summary

North Dakota s Nutrient Reduction Strategy. Presented to the 2016 ND Water Quality Monitoring Conference March 4, 2016

GREAT LAKES WATER QUALITY

Surface Water Management Strategy

Canadian Mercury Science Assessment Executive Summary

The International Joint Commission

Drafting a Strategic Plan for SLPWA s Future Mr. Richard Weakland SLPWA President Elect

Running Head: HOW CAN WE IMPROVE CANADA S FRESH WATER? 1

Water Quality Monitoring for Lake Erie and the Great Lakes Nutrient Initiative (GLNI)

Experts generally agree that aquatic invasive species (AIS) present

Prioritizing Habitat Projects in Areas of Concern Throughout the Great Lakes

Great Lakes Biodiversity Conservation Strategies

FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS TO GREAT LAKES INDICATORS

Climate Change and Adaptation in the Great Lakes. Photo credit: Alan Amati

Data Sources and Methods for the Drinking Water Advisories in Canada Indicator. May 2014

INFRASTRUCTURE SPOTLIGHT: CANADA S SMALL AND RURAL COMMUNITIES

Theme: Climate action, agriculture waste management and pollution-free oceans

Data Sources and Methods for the Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Large Facilities Indicator. May 2013

LAKE MICHIGAN LAMP PARTNERSHIP WORK

Sharing Loading Estimation Experiences Workshop January 20, 2015 Ausable Bayfield Conservation Authority

Environment Canada Alberta Environment and Water March 2012

INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION NIPIGON BAY STAGE 2 REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN REVIEW


Watershed Management Planning and Terms of Reference Workshop

W ater Act. Policy Framework. Consultation Draft. princeedwardisland.ca/wateract

Science supporting the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement: Groundwater and Climate Change Information Needs and Gaps

Overview of Binational Approaches to Address Nutrients and Impacts in Lake Erie

A Guide to the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. Background for the 2006 Governmental Review

Environment Canada. RE: Draft Canada-Ontario Agreement on Great Lakes Water Quality and Ecosystem Health, 2014

Forest Resource Assessment Policy

Forest Resource Assessment Policy

Water Security Agency. Plan for saskatchewan.ca

Alberta s Biodiversity Policy DRAFT

Cost/benefit Analysis Stormwater Detention Pond Maintenance Controls Demonstration Project. Objective

R.N. Nordin Ph.D. Resource Quality Section Water Management Branch Ministry of Environment (now called Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection)

Ontario s Great Lakes Strategy. First Progress Report

Canada-Ontario Lake Erie Action Plan. Partnering on Achieving Phosphorus Loading Reductions to Lake Erie from Canadian Sources February 2018

September 16, Advice on Parties Science Priorities. Dear Messrs. Davis and Goffin,

Operational Policy Statement

STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT POLICY INDUSTRY CANADA

Before the International Joint Commission

White Paper

Otonabee Region WATERSHED

Chapter 4 Watershed Goals and Objectives

The Pest Management Regulatory Agency publications team was responsible for the translation, formatting and publication of this document.

Status of the Niagara River (New York) RAP

Partnering on Achieving Phosphorus Loading Reductions in Lake Erie from Canadian Sources

SUBMISSION TO THE INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION

SUMMARY OF TWS STANDING POSITIONS

STATE OF FLORIDA. OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER (Achieving More Now For Florida's Environment)

Tackling Non-point Source Water Pollution in British Columbia

TOXIC POLLUTANTS. Goal 1: Virtually eliminate the discharge of any or all persistent toxic substances (PTS) to the Great Lakes basin ecosystem;

North Carolina Nutrient Criteria Development Plan

Status and Needs of Michigan s Aquatic Invasive Species Management Plan. Roger Eberhardt Office of the Great Lakes

A Saginaw River/Bay Area of Concern Challenge - Assessing the Eutrophication or Undesirable Algae Beneficial Use Impairment Michelle Selzer Lake

Clean Water Act Basics: An Overview of Core Programs. Merritt Frey Habitat Program Director River Network

Re: Response for Public Hearing on Bill 66, Great Lakes Protection Act, 2015

Ontario s Cottage Country Lakes. Long-term Trends in Water Quality from the Lake Partner Program

Transcription:

What is the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement? OVERVIEW The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (GLWQA) is an agreement between Canada and the United States, first signed in 1972. It contributes to the quality of life of millions of Canadians by identifying shared priorities and coordinating actions to restore and protect the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the waters of the Great Lakes. In amending the Agreement in 2012, the Governments of Canada and the United States have committed to a shared vision of a healthy and prosperous Great Lakes region in which the waters of the Great Lakes, through their sound management, use, and enjoyment, provide benefits to present and future generations. To this end, Canada and the United States recognize the importance of taking action, resolving existing environmental issues, and anticipating and preventing future problems. Through the GLWQA, Canada and the United States, in consultation and cooperation with other levels of government, First Nations and Métis organizations, businesses, non-governmental entities, and the public will develop programs, technologies and other measures necessary to better understand the Great Lakes ecosystem, and to restore and protect water quality and ecosystem health. To view specific commitments, objectives and actions to address environmental issues affecting the Lakes, see the annex links below: Annex 1: Areas of Concern Annex 2: Lakewide Management Annex 3: Chemicals of Mutual Concern Annex 4: Nutrients Annex 5: Discharges from Vessels Annex 6: Aquatic Invasive Species Annex 7: Habitat and Species Annex 8: Groundwater Annex 9: Climate Change Impacts Annex 10: Science For more information: A Renewed Commitment to Action: The 2012 Agreement. History of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.

A Renewed Commitment to Action: The 2012 Agreement Through the 2012 Agreement, Canada and the United States have established a shared vision and common objectives and commitments to science, governance and action that will help to restore and protect Great Lakes water quality and ecosystem health. Both countries have considered input from other governmental and non-governmental organizations and various stakeholders to create a forward-thinking agreement that commits the two countries to action on current challenges while also expanding the list of issues to be addressed. Canada and the United States have updated the agreement s goals and committed to developing and reporting on environmental indicators that will allow Canadians to assess how the Great Lakes are responding in relation to the following: Providing a source of safe, high-quality drinking water; Allowing for unrestricted swimming and other recreational use; Allowing for unrestricted human consumption of the fish and wildlife; Supporting healthy and productive habitats to sustain our native species; Being free from pollutants that could harm people, wildlife or organisms; Being free from nutrients that promote unsightly algae or toxic blooms; Being free from aquatic invasive species; Being free from the harmful impacts of contaminated groundwater; Being free from other substances, materials or conditions that may negatively affect the Great Lakes. The 2012 Agreement is: Comprehensive: NEW annexes for addressing priority challenges While upholding and modernizing commitments made in the past, the 2012 Agreement commits Canada and the United States to tackling other priority issues facing the Great Lakes. The agreement has expanded the range of environmental issues to be addressed to include: Aquatic Invasive Species: a new annex that outlines commitments to preventing the introduction and spread of aquatic invasive species. Habitat and Species: a new annex that outlines commitments to preventing the further loss of habitat and species, and to providing valuable ecosystem services. Climate Change Impacts: a new annex that outlines commitments to considering climate change impacts in order to enhance the long-term effectiveness of Great Lakes management strategies. 2 Overview

Action-oriented: establishing clear commitments The 2012 Agreement commits the parties to short-term and long-term actions, including: Developing a nearshore assessment and management framework within three years; Developing achievable, science-based phosphorus reduction targets for Lake Erie within three years in order to take action in combating the algae issue; Within five years, Canada and the United States will develop binational phosphorusreduction strategies for Lake Erie and detailed domestic action plans to meet objectives for phosphorus concentrations, meet loading targets and divide the phosphorus loads between the countries; Developing and implementing an early detection and rapid response system, within two years, in order to identify quickly and take action on new threats of invasive species; Developing, within two years, lake-wide habitat and species protection and restoration conservation strategies for each of the Great Lakes; Developing, within two years, a baseline report on all relevant and available groundwater science in recognition of the important role that groundwater plays in overall water quality; Reporting on progress through a comprehensive Progress Report every three years; Convening a Great Lakes Summit every three years, to discuss and receive public input on trends in environmental quality and progress in implementing the 2012 Agreement. Effective: enhancing transparency and accountability The 2012 Agreement outlines measures for stronger transparency and accountability, by: Increasing public and stakeholder engagement; Establishing a Great Lakes Public Forum to present, discuss and receive public input on trends in environmental quality, progress in implementing the 2012 Agreement, and future priorities; Creating the Canada United States Great Lakes Executive Committee with participation from federal, state, tribal, provincial and municipal governments, First Nations, Métis, watershed management agencies, and other local public agencies, in order to coordinate action and to advise the parties on implementation of the Agreement. 3 Overview

Modernized: reflecting current knowledge and understanding Approaches to environmental management and our understanding of the ecosystem have evolved since the agreement was last amended in 1987. The 2012 Agreement reflects these advances by including a new focus on nearshore water quality and adaptive management approaches. Forward-thinking: preventing new problems With the 2012 Agreement, Canada and the United States have devised a progressive and forward-thinking plan of action. The focus is on taking necessary actions to resolve problems that already exist, and anticipating and preventing new environmental problems. 4 Overview

History of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement Canada and the United States have a long history of working together to restore and protect the Great Lakes. Over the years, the challenges facing the Great Lakes have changed, and so too has the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (GLWQA) in order to effectively address current and future challenges. 1960s During the 1960s, water quality issues in the Great Lakes first became a public concern. Lake Erie in particular was perceived to be dying because too much phosphorus was getting into the lake, causing massive algal blooms that were robbing the water of oxygen, killing fish and disrupting the food web. By the late 1960s, Canada and the United States were in agreement that action was needed. 1970s The original 1972 Agreement focused primarily on reducing algae. Both nations agreed that a coordinated approach to limiting phosphorus inputs was the key to controlling excessive algal growth. Actions taken in support of the GLWQA reduced excess algae growth. Phosphorus levels in the Great Lakes declined significantly during the 1970s and 1980s. At the time, this was an unprecedented success in achieving environmental results and demonstrating the value of binational cooperation. In 1978, the Agreement was revised to reflect a broadened goal "to restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the waters of the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem." While reaffirming and building upon the 1972 Agreement, the 1978 Agreement introduced the ecosystem approach, a concept for identifying, managing and preventing environmental problems around the Great Lakes. This approach recognized the interconnectedness of all components of the environment and the need for an integrated perspective in addressing human health and environmental quality issues. Through the GLWQA, Canada and the United States were early adopters of the ecosystem approach, and continue to be guided by it today. The 1978 Agreement included a new focus on toxic substances in the Great Lakes ecosystem. Canada and the United States have taken action to reduce the release of toxic chemicals into the environment, resulting in significant decreases in the levels of toxic substances within the Great Lakes ecosystem. 5 Overview

1980s The Agreement was amended again in 1987, and the concept of Areas of Concern was introduced. These are the most severely degraded locations within the Great Lakes. Through the 1987 GLWQA, Canada and the United States committed to identify specific impairments such as fish and wildlife consumption restrictions, undesirable algae or beach closings, and to restore the ecosystem within these areas. 2012 The Agreement was amended in 2012 to better identify, manage and prevent current and emerging environmental issues affecting the Great Lakes. Engaging citizens, provinces, municipalities, Aboriginal peoples, industry, nongovernmental organizations and other stakeholders was essential for successfully developing an inclusive agreement with the United States. Cooperating and consulting with individuals and organizations is now critical to moving forward to implement Canada s commitments under the Agreement. Often cited as one of the most forward-thinking diplomatic achievements for the environment, the Agreement has served as a model for international agreements to protect and restore environments elsewhere in the world. Cat. No.: En4-154/2012E-PDF ISBN: 978-1-100-20553-3 For information regarding reproduction rights, please contact Public Works and Government Services Canada at 613-996-6886 or at droitdauteur.copyright@tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca Photos: NASA and GeoEye; Thinkstock 2012 6 Overview Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2012 Aussi disponible en français