Coal Mine Methane: US Update

Similar documents
Global Overview of Policies Affecting Coal Mine Methane (CMM) Recovery and Utilization

Coal Mine Methane Project Development: Global Update

Coal Mine Methane Recovery & Utilization in the United States: Emerging Trends

Coal Mine Methane Recovery & Utilization: A Global Overview of Project Opportunities

Ventilation Air Methane Abatement System Review

USEPA and the Global Methane Initiative in Mongolia and the Region

The Global Methane Initiative and Coal Mine Methane Mitigation

METHANE ABATEMENT PROJECTS IN DEVELOPMENT AT CONSOL ENERGY

VAM PROCESSING; - ITS IMPACT ON CLIMATE CHANGE - WHY INVESTORS ARE HESITATING. UN Ad Hoc Group of Experts on Coal Mine Methane, Geneva.

U.S. Efforts to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The Transportation Sector

An Overview of Offsets from Mine Methane Capture and their Role in California Cap-and-Trade. June 19, 2014

Coal Mine Methane Project Protocol Scoping Meeting. Denver, CO February 10, 2009

Coal Mine Technical Subcommittee Progress Report

Methane Capture and Utilization

Barriers to Methane Mitigation and the Role of Finance

COALBED METHANE IN THE UNITED STATES: A GIS STUDY

Jeff Muffat Member of EPA s GHG BACT Workgroup & Manager of Environmental Regulatory Affairs for 3M Company

Coal Mine Gas. Utilization Principles

CMM Offset Generating Project Case Studies

Chapter 14. Are Coal Mines Now Stationary Sources Under the Clean Air Act?

Applying CDM to CBM/CMM Projects

Recent Trends in Recovery and Use of Coal Mine Methane

Regulatory Announcement

Identifying Opportunities for Methane Recovery at U.S. Coal Mines: Profiles of Selected Gassy Underground Coal Mines

The Impact of the Kyoto Protocol on the Global Coal Mine Methane Market

VAMOX Projects at Walter Energy s Coal Mines. GMI Methane Expo Vancouver March 14, 2013

Strategies to Reduce GHG Emissions from Coal Mines: A Review of Australian Perspective

Coal Mine Methane Drainage Considerations. Sabinas Basin, Coahuila Mexico. for the. Presented to: M2M Technical Workshop Monterrey, Mexico

Embryonic Stages Of Federal Climate Change Policy

Pre-Mining Methane Drainage Drilling Applications

In full operation the world s first VAM Power Plant

Duke Energy s Low Carbon Strategy Initiatives for West Virginia December 8, 2009

From Frisbees to Flatulence? What s Next for Regulation of Climate Change

Utilization prospects for coal mine methane (CMM) in Kuzbass

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS & RESPONSES ON THE DRAFT COAL MINE METHANE PROJECT PROTOCOL September 25, 2009

US EPA s domestic and international climate and air quality co-benefits activities

Case Study: Green Gas DPB, Czech Republic Integrated, large scale Mine Gas Management

Clean and Secure Energy Actions Report 2010 Update. GHG Policies

Climate Change Issues and Initiatives Matt Kuryla January 8, 2008 HOU03:

The Worlds 1 st large scale VAM Power Plant now under construction in i

Global Warming Legislation and EPA Rules: Their Impact on State and Local Air Agencies. Amy Royden-Bloom

Overview of U.S. and European Climate Change Programs. Reid Harvey, U.S. EPA Presented at LSU Energy Summit October 24, 2007

3.7 Climate Change and Greenhouse Gases

visited June 25, 2014). 4 Id. 5 Id. 6 See, e.g., J.M. Somers & H.K. Schultz, Thermal oxidation of coal mine ventilation air methane (2008), available

AUSTRALIAN COAL ACTION PLAN

中国煤矿煤层气开发利用项目前景及鼓励政策

Preferential Policy and International Action of CBM/CMM Development in China. Huang Shengchu, Ph.D, President China Coal Information Institute

LIVING IN THE ENVIRONMENT, 18e G. TYLER MILLER SCOTT E. SPOOLMAN. Climate Disruption. Cengage Learning 2015

Climate Change Regulations

Main Anthropogenic Sources of Greenhouse Gases Agriculture, Fire, Change in Land Use and Transport

Powder River Basin Underground Coal Gasification WY EORI CO2 Conference June 23-24, 2009

Project of CMM Utilization in the Kuzbass Coal Basin, Evaluation of CMM Emission inrussian Federation

The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (H.R.2454)

Update on USEPA Actions to address Climate Change. Colleen McKaughan Associate Director, Air Division US EPA Region IX June 10, 2010

Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Final Rule (74 Fed. Reg. 56,260)

4.9 Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Regulating Fuel Efficiency The CAFE Standards and Beyond

Case study: CMM utilisation and methane emissions mitigation at three large coal mines China Initial conditions:

The Supreme Court and EPA Carbon Rules. Michael B. Gerrard Environmental and Energy Study Institute briefing March 6, 2014

Greenhouse Gases, Climate Change and U.S. Energy Policy -- Navy s Current & Emerging Challenges

Review of Mine Safety Regulations UNECE Ad Hoc Group of Experts on CMM. Victoria Burn Associate Norton Rose LLP 16 October 2008

XXV: policy and regulatory responses to the energy-climate problem

METHANE TO MARKET PARTNERSHIP Coal Mine to Market Subcommittee Country Profile: ITALY 1. INTRODUCTION OR SUMMARY OF COAL INDUSTRY AND CMM RECOVERY/USE

Approved VCS Methodology VM0014 Version 1.0 Sectoral Scopes 1, 10

Methane to Markets Partnership Coal Mine Methane Project Opportunities in China

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 3269

Pennsylvania s Climate Change Action Plan Solid Waste Advisory Committee

A BETTER CANADA A CLEANER ENVIRONMENT: The Development of Motor Vehicle Fuel Consumption Regulations

A Comparison of Coalbed Methane Drilling Practices in the Southern Shanxi Province, China, through Advanced Reservoir Modeling

ELEVATING VAM RTO INLET CONCENTRATION THROUGH CMM BLENDING FOR POWER GENERATION

ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT WORKING PAPER. Department of Economics Tufts University Medford, MA (617)

IMO PREVENTION OF AIR POLLUTION FROM SHIPS. Consideration of adoption of three principles for market-based instruments

Unit 9 - Climate Change

Enhanced Coal Bed Methane (CBM) Recovery and CO 2 Sequestration in an Unmineable Coal Seam

Climate Change: Mitigation and Adaptation

Draft Large-scale Consolidated Methodology ACM0008: Abatement of methane from coal mines

2 Definition of Terms

Swarupa Ganguli. Program Manager Landfill Methane Outreach Program U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Budget Paper E MADE-IN-MANITOBA CLIMATE AND GREEN PLAN

State Fiscal Implications of Climate Change Legislation to Energy-Dependent States

MJB&A Summary July 24, 2018

The Global Supply Chain and Greenhouse Gases: a North American Perspective

US Support of the Global Methane Initiative

ANNEX E: Methodology for Estimating CH 4 Emissions from Coal Mining

Summary of Climate Action Panel Recommendations. Colorado Emissions

EPA FACT SHEET: Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard for New Power Plants

3.3 CLIMATE CHANGE Regulatory Setting. Federal Greenhouse Gas Regulations. California Greenhouse Gas Regulations

Carbon Risks and Opportunities in the Mining Industry Edward C. (Ted) Bell, P. Eng. Partner, Tax Services May 16, 2012

PERP/PERP ABSTRACTS Coal Bed Methane PERP 09/10S3

Non-CO2 Gas Offsets (Methane and fluorinated gases): EPA s voluntary program experiences

CBM AND CMM DEVELOPMENT IN MONGOLIA NEW POLICIES TO STIMULATE CLEAN ENERGY PROJECTS

Energy and Climate Change, A Washington Perspective

METHANE TO MARKETS PARTNERSHIP COAL SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING FINAL MINUTES

EPA FACT SHEET: Reducing Carbon Pollution From Power Plants Details About the Proposal for New Sources

Poland Coal Sector Update Global Methane Initiative Coal Subcommittee Meeting

What to do with CO 2 : The Knowns and Unknowns of Geologic Sequestration and CO 2 EOR in Greenhouse Gas Context

Maxwell Climate Change Workshop Background: The Nature of the Problem

Greenhouse Gas Regulatory Update Myriam McChargue, Camp Dresser & McKee

Natural Gas- Green, Homegrown Energy for Virginia. Greg Kozera. President, Virginia Oil and Gas Association

Draft baseline and monitoring methodology. Interception, recovery and use of methane from CBM seeps that would otherwise be released to the atmosphere

Transcription:

Coal Mine Methane: US Update Pamela M. Franklin US Environmental Protection Agency 6 th Session of the Ad Hoc Group of Experts on Coal Mine Methane United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Committee on Sustainable Energy Palais des Nations, Geneva 11-12 October, 2010

US Environmental Protection Agency Coalbed Methane Outreach Program Voluntary program has promoted recovery and use of coal mine methane since 1994 US CMM industry is robust ~ 80% of methane from US coal mine degasification systems is recovered and used In 1993, only ~ 25% was recovered and used US EPA collaborates with industry, private sector to promote CMM projects Provide information about potential opportunities at US mines (active and abandoned) Provide tools, end-use assessments, technical and economic analyses Supported technology demonstration of VAM abatement

Outline Background: US EPA US EPA Endangerment Determination US climate policy and its role in coal mine methane project development US CMM emissions and opportunities

US EPA s Endangerment Determination April 2, 2007 In Massachusetts v. EPA, the Supreme Court found that greenhouse gases are air pollutants covered by the Clean Air Act EPA was required determine whether: GHG emissions from new motor vehicles cause or contribute to air pollution; This air pollution may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare; or The science is too uncertain to make a reasoned decision 4

US EPA s Endangerment Findings December 7, 2009 Administrator issued two distinct findings regarding greenhouse gases under section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act Endangerment Finding: Current and projected concentrations of the mix of six key greenhouse in the atmosphere threaten the public health and welfare Cause or Contribute Finding: Combined emissions of CO 2, CH 4, N 2 O, and HFCs from new motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines contribute to the atmospheric concentrations of these key greenhouse gases, and hence to the threat of climate change As part of development of final finding, EPA did a comprehensive review of the science 380,000 public comments; 11,000 significant Many raised issues with the science and provided literature Response to Comments document thoroughly addresses all comments 5

The Public Health and Public Welfare Elements of the Endangerment Findings Public Health The Administrator has considered how elevated concentrations of the well-mixed greenhouse gases and associated climate change affect public health by evaluating the risks associated with changes in air quality, increases in temperatures, changes in extreme weather events, increases in food- and water-borne pathogens, and changes in aeroallergens. Finally, the Administrator places weight on the fact that certain groups, including children, the elderly, and the poor, are most vulnerable to these climate-related health effects. Public Welfare The Administrator has considered how elevated concentrations of the well-mixed greenhouse gases and associated climate change affect public welfare by evaluating numerous and far-ranging risks to food production and agriculture, forestry, water resources, sea level rise and coastal areas, energy, infrastructure, and settlements, and ecosystems and wildlife. 6

Endangerment Petitions EPA received 10 administrative petitions for reconsideration for the Endangerment Findings. With this decision, EPA decided there was no scientific or other basis to change its 2009 finding that climate change caused by emissions of greenhouse gases threatens public health and the environment. Petitions were denied July 29, 2010. The endangerment finding is based on years of science from the U.S. and around the world. These petitions -- based as they are on selectively edited, out-of-context data and a manufactured controversy -- provide no evidence to undermine our determination. Excess greenhouse gases are a threat to our health and welfare. -- EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson 7

US Climate Policy US Congress has not yet passed comprehensive climate change legislation, but passing climate legislation remains a priority for the Administration. EPA is already working to regulate greenhouse gas emissions through the Clean Air Act the law that authorizes EPA to regulate all other air pollutants. EPA established the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program to collect annual emissions data from large facilities. The reporting program will cover more than 85 to 90% of total US greenhouse gas emissions. EPA will receive the first annual reports in March 2011. Gassy underground coal mines are included and must monitor beginning in 2011,with first reporting in March 2012. These data will assist in the development of future climate policies. EPA finalized regulations in 2010 affecting businesses planning to build new, large facilities or make major expansions to existing facilities. EPA set greenhouse gas emission standards for new cars and light duty trucks for model years 2012 2016.

US federal government role in CMM project development Some legislative proposals include CMM as potential offsets under a national cap and trade greenhouse gas emissions control program. Federal tax incentives for CBM/CMM gas production have expired. There is federal funding (e.g., Department of Energy) for research and development on carbon capture and sequestration, fossil energy exploration and production

US legal framework for CMM project development On Federal lands (much of western US), federal government owns mineral leases (coal, oil, gas). Oil & gas estates are separate from coal estate, so the right to use CMM is not automatically granted to the coal mine. Currently, there is no regulatory policy requiring or encouraging CMM to be used or destroyed On private ( fee ) lands, ownership of coal seam gas depends on laws of each state. Several states have enacted legislation to clarify ownership. Many disputes are resolved through legal challenges and negotiations.

2008 U.S. CMM Emissions Ventilation air methane (VAM), (100.94 bcf), 56% Drained gas (10.05 bcf), 6% Abandoned mines (14.57 bcf), 8% Surface mines (35.33 bcf), 19% Post-mining (20.91 bcf), 11% Total CMM emissions: 181.8 Bcf

United States: Existing CMM Projects CMM recovered and utilized (2008) 44.4 Bcf - equal to 20 MMTCO2e emissions avoided Active Underground Mines: projects at 14 mines Total recovered and used: 37 Bcf All projects use gas from drainage (degas) systems Abandoned Mines: projects at about 30 mines Total recovered and used: 7.7 bcf Surface Mines: project in Powder River Basin Estimated recovered emissions = 3.7 bcf (2006 2009)

Examples of U.S. Projects

Active Underground Mines: Drainage Systems Ventilation air methane (VAM), (100.94 bcf), 56% Drained gas (10.05 bcf), 6% Abandoned mines (14.57 bcf), 8% Surface mines (35.33 bcf), 19% Post-mining (20.91 bcf), 11%

Active Underground Mines: Drainage Systems Low-hanging fruit : ~ 10 Bcf emitted from drainage systems (2008) available for utilization >23 US mines currently use drainage systems More mines could install a drainage system to augment their ventilation system New systems may be installed as mines get deeper, more gassy Challenges (especially in western US): Gas ownership / rights are unresolved on federal lands Rugged terrain, limited access to pipeline, regulatory restrictions

Active Underground Mines: VAM Ventilation air methane (VAM), (100.94 bcf), 56% Drained gas (10.05 bcf), 6% Abandoned mines (14.57 bcf), 8% Surface mines (35.33 bcf), 19% Post-mining (20.91 bcf), 11%

Active Underground Mines: VAM US VAM emissions: 101 Bcf (2008) Rules of thumb for economical oxidation projects: Minimum 0.6% methane concentration Drained gas can be blended in to boost lower methane concentrations Ideally, ~0.9% for maximum output and revenue EPA has developed a summary of data on mine shaft methane concentrations for 39 gassy US mines Based on MSHA data for 2008-2009 Data illustrates variability for exhausts with >0.3% methane 24 exhausts at 16 mines appear to have good potential for VAM mitigation projects (methane concentrations >0.8%) Before project development, site-specific measurements would be needed

US VAM Mitigation Activities Underway Technology demonstrations using thermal oxidizers completed or underway CONSOL Windsor Mine (closed) (MEGTEC vocsidizer) JWR Mine No. 4 (Biothermica VAMOX) New projects announced CONSOL McElroy mine in WV (Durr Ecopure technology) to go online in the second quarter of 2011 CONSOL Enlow Fork mine in PA operational late 2010

CMOP VAM Resources CMOP s Project Cash Flow Model Tool Version 2.0 with new VAM modules under development CMOP resources online: VAM Measurement Methodologies US VAM exhaust shaft characterization VAM Technologies Overview

Abandoned Underground Mines Ventilation air methane (VAM), (100.94 bcf), 56% Drained gas (10.05 bcf), 6% Abandoned mines (14.57 bcf), 8% Surface mines (35.33 bcf), 19% Post-mining (20.91 bcf), 11%

Abandoned Underground Mines 14.6 Bcf emitted (available) in 2008 Additional mines closed every year EPA has developed database of project opportunities at 400 abandoned mines Challenges: Identifying owners of mine / gas / surface and acquiring rights, especially mines closed before 1972 Predicting future gas resources over time and status of mine (e.g., fully or partially flooded) Location sometimes remote: market access, end-use

Surface Mines Ventilation air methane (VAM), (100.94 bcf), 56% Drained gas (10.05 bcf), 6% Abandoned mines (14.57 bcf), 8% Surface mines (35.33 bcf), 19% Post-mining (20.91 bcf), 11%

Active Surface Mines 35.3 Bcf emitted from surface mines in 2008 Powder River Basin (PRB) produces > 50% of all surface-mined coal in U.S. Thick seams, very permeable coal Extensive pipelines and other infrastructure Pre-mine drainage and recovery project at North Rochelle Antelope mine is registered with VCS, producing carbon credits Challenges: Limited information on current activities, future opportunities Distinction between CBM and CMM may be unclear Ownership issues: different parties, difficult to coordinate

Thank you! US EPA Coalbed Methane Outreach Program www.epa.gov/cmop Ms. Pamela Franklin franklin.pamela@epa.gov + 1.202.343.9476