Agriculture & Business Management Notes...

Similar documents
The Contributions Approach to Establishing Equitable Pasture Lease Agreements Stocking Rates

Agriculture & Business Management Notes...

Managing For Today s Cattle Market And Beyond: A Comparative Analysis Of ND - Demo Cow Herd To North Dakota Database

SOIL MAPPING UNITS AND GRAZING INDICES

Managing For Today s Cattle Market And Beyond A Comparative Analysis Of Demo Herd 1997 Herd To McKenzie County Database

Agriculture & Business Management Notes...

Cow-Calf Enterprise Standardized Performance Analysis

Determining Pasture Rents

Cash Flow and Enterprise Information - step two for your 2016 farm analysis

Determining Your Unit Costs of Producing A Hundred Weight of Calf

Annual Summary Data Kentucky Beef Farms

Guidelines for Estimating. Beef Grassing Costs. in Manitoba

COSTS AND RETURNS OF SAMPLE RANCHING BUSINESSES IN VARIOUS AREAS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

BEEF COW/CALF ENTERPRISE BUDGET 2016 Estimated Costs and Returns - San Luis Valley

2015 LEASE SURVEY SUMMARY REPORT K-State Research and Extension Post Rock District MITCHELL County

Ranch Calculator (RanchCalc)

GUIDE TO ASSEMBLING DATA FOR COW-CALF

Annual Summary Data Kentucky Beef Farms 2013

Profit = Income - Costs. Profit = Income - Costs. What are overhead costs? Estimated average cow costs What are variable costs?

Pasture Rental Rates. What do you expect pasture rent to do in 2016?

OPERATING INPUTS Unit Price Quantity Total $/Head. Grain Head $ - 1 $ - $ - Other Feed Additives Head $ - 1 $ - $ -

MEASURING SCOPE EFFICIENCY FOR CROP AND BEEF FARMS. M. R. Langemeier 1 and R. D. Jones 1

2007 Michigan Dairy Grazing Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper December, 2008

Howard County Ag. Day: Beef Cow Economics

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE August 1972 FCR-83 cooperating with New Mexico State University COSTS NOV

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2016 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

2006 Michigan Dairy Grazing Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper November, 2007

Extension. Establishing a Fair Pasture Rental Rate

Kansas Farm Economy Update Land and Leasing

Slope Farms. Our farm. Our work with other farmers. Experience with leasing land. Models for seasonal grazing

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2010 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

3. Total revenue 80,605 1,622

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2008 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

2007 PLANNING BUDGETS FOR DAIRY PRODUCTION IN MISSISSIPPI COSTS AND RETURNS. 112 and 250 COW DAIRY ENTERPRISES LARGE BREED CATTLE MISSISSIPPI, 2007

Background and Assumptions

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Bringing the University to You

The Value of Improving the Performance of your Cow-Calf Operation

2014 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper December, 2015

Economics 330 Fall 2005 Exam 1. Strategic Planning and Budgeting

Background and Assumptions

2015 LEASE SURVEY SUMMARY REPORT K-State Research and Extension Post Rock District OSBORNE County

Beef Cattle Profitability Expectations for Kenny Burdine UK Agricultural Economics

Background and Assumptions

~il~~:~~ii~!. ~...~: {(.~i. !!.~I~ji!': i~i( l:;i;!i:i;i;i:::-: :: C: ..::::)~::m~:l::::t:m:;::;;%::;:!;:;:;:j;.:;:;::::;::j::j:j\:;..

Grass-fed and Organic Beef: Production Costs and Breakeven Market Prices, 2008 and 2009

BLUESTEM PASTURE RELEASE 2017

STATEMENT OF FARMING INCOME AND EXPENSES

2015 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper November, 2016

Central Texas Cow/Calf Clinic

Oklahoma Cropland Rental Rates: Roger Sahs Associate Extension Specialist

STATEMENT OF FARMING INCOME AND EXPENSES

An Economic Comparison of Organic and Conventional Dairy Production, and Estimations on the Cost of Transitioning to Organic Production

2009 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper December, 2010

Elko County Cow-Calf Production Costs & Returns, 2006

2007 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper December, 2008

2006 Iowa Farm Costs. and Returns File C1-10. Ag Decision Maker. Definition of Terms Used

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2017 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

Guidelines for Estimating. Bison Cow-Calf Production Costs 2017 in Manitoba

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations

BUSINESS SUMMARY DAIRY FARM NEW YORK SMALL HERD FARMS, 140 COWS OR FEWER, 2013 JULY 2014 E.B

NEBRASKA FFA FARM MANAGEMENT CAREER DEVELOPMENT CONTEST 2016 Farm Business Management Practice Contest Examination

Multi-Year Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations

Grain versus Grazing: The Decision Process. Stan Bevers Professor & Extension Economist Vernon, Texas

Benchmarking Your Herd s Economic Facts

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations

Costs to Produce Corn and Soybeans in Illinois 2017

Total 2, ,519

Beef Cow Enterprises 2000 Costs and Returns Summary. Kentucky Farm Business Management Program

MILK PRODUCTION COSTS in 2000 on Selected WISCONSIN DAIRY FARMS

2018 UW Extension Cattle Feeders Workshops UW Extension Beef Decision Making Tools

FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT

PROJECTED COSTS AND RETURNS FOR BEEF CATTLE, DAIRY PRODUCTION, SWINE PRODUCTION AND FORAGE CROPS IN LOUISIANA, 1997

Will it Pay? Economics of Improving Grazing Systems Curt Lacy Extension Economist-Livestock The University of Georgia

Background and Assumptions

Key Factors Contributing to Cow-Calf Costs, Profits, and Production

2004 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper September 2005

BUSINESS SUMMARY DAIRY FARM NEW YORK SMALL HERD FARMS, 140 COWS OR FEWER, 2014 JUNE 2015 E.B

Guidelines for Estimating. Beef Cow-Calf Production Costs. in Manitoba

April 1983 A.E. Ext

Cow-Calf Ranch Input Worksheet- Unit Cost of Production Workshop Users Guide

ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE COW HERD C.P. Mathis, C.T. Braden, R.D. Rhoades, and K.C. McCuistion

Using Enterprise Budgets to Compute Crop Breakeven Prices Michael Langemeier, Associate Director, Center for Commercial Agriculture

USING PRODUCTION COSTS AND BREAKEVEN LEVELS TO DETERMINE INCOME POSSIBILITIES

BUSINESS SUMMARY DAIRY FARM NEW YORK SMALL HERD FARMS, 120 COWS OR FEWER, 2011 JULY 2012 E.B

Public Lands Grazing Fees Important to Utah

Understanding and Controlling Basic Cost Inputs into the Cow Herd

Current Report. Oklahoma Cropland Rental Rates: CR

2011 STATE FFA FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT TEST PART 2. Financial Statements (FINPACK Balance Sheets found in the resource information)

Contribution of Federal Lands to Wyoming Range Livestock Production, 1992

Chapter 7. Dairy -- Farm Management Wayne A. Knoblauch, Professor George J. Conneman, Professor Emeritus Cathryn Dymond, Extension Support Specialist

2017 Agricultural Land Valuation Study

Guidelines for Estimating. Beef Cow-Calf Production Costs 2017 in Manitoba

Differences Between High-, Medium-, and Low-Profit Cow-Calf Producers: An Analysis of Kansas Farm Management Association Cow-Calf Enterprise

A. Circle the best answer. Put a square around your second choice, if you want. If your second choice is correct you get half credit.

Methods and Procedures of Estimating Rent for Crop Share, and Flexable Cash Leases.

Tools to Help Beef Cattle Producers Make Economically Sound Restocking Decisions

A Method for Determining Ranch Profit Probabilities When Livestock Yields Are Normally Distributed

2008 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Stephen Harsh. Staff Paper November, 2009

E NOVEMBER Cow-Calf Enterprises on Wheat Farms in the Columbia Basin of Oregon. ,v N126(06, ;iteredere.540r4l, SPECIAL REPORT) 242

Transcription:

Agriculture & Business Management Notes... Pasture Leases Quick Notes... A lease is an agreement giving use of an asset to a lessee for a specific period of time at a specified rate without transfer of ownership. Pasture leases may be calculated on a per head, per acre, or share of gains basis. The terms of a lease agreement should be in writing. Types of land rental agreements vary widely in each locality and from one livestock producing area to another. Most often these are based on long-standing traditions. The purpose of this publication is to help landowners and livestock owners make informed decisions and to develop "fair" pasture lease arrangements. A sample pasture lease agreement can be found as a supplement to this document. Although beef cattle examples are used in this publication, the principles and worksheets apply to all roughage-consuming livestock. Also, the values used in the various worksheets represent illustrations of the principles. Landowners and livestock owners should use their own costs and prices to determine an equitable lease. What is a Pasture Lease Agreement? A lease is basically an agreement giving use of an asset to a lessee for a specific period of time at a specified rate. A lease does not transfer title of ownership nor an equity interest in the asset. A pasture lease is an agreement in which the owner of pasture land receives a rental fee from the owner of livestock. The livestock owner uses the pasture and makes general management decisions as if owner of the land. Labeling a document as a lease does not necessarily mean it is a lease according to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Questions concerning IRS treatment of a lease should be addressed by a tax management professional. Also, the legalities of the lease should be addressed by professional legal counsel. Establishing Lease Rates: Per Acre or Per Head The livestock owner can pay the landowner a rent based on acres of pasture or number of animals grazing the pasture. The landowner s cost and livestock owner s return are two commonly used methods to determine a fair pasture rent per acre or head. Colorado State University, U.S. Department of Agriculture and Colorado counties cooperating. Extension programs are available to all without discrimination. No endorsement of products is intended nor is criticism of products mentioned.

Landowner's Cost Method For the landowner's cost method, the objective is to establish fair values for the resources and annual use charges. Land: The value of land should be its fair market value for agricultural purposes. The influence of location near cities and other nonagricultural influences on value should be ignored. Return on land investment: A percentage of land value indicates the landowner's return to the current value and also reflects pasture productivity. A percentage rate of 5 to 7 percent is suggested because (1) the current value of the land is used rather than the purchased price; (2) if the pasture were sold, the net dollars available to the seller would be lower than the current value due to income taxes and sale expenses; and (3) actual returns to land have been in the 3 to 5 percent range as an annual return above all charges, except land. Real estate taxes: The actual real estate taxes due annually. Land improvements: The average dollars spent annually for land improvements, conservation practices, and maintenance. Building facility investment: A fair market value should be placed on fences, wells, ponds, buildings, and handling facilities. Ownership costs on this investment include depreciation, interest, repairs, taxes, and insurance. 1. Depreciation: Depreciable life for buildings and facilities usually ranges from 15 to 25 years. 2. Interest: The current interest cost on the average investment value (one-half the total value) should be used. 3. Repairs, taxes, and insurance: Facility repairs usually vary from 1 to 3 percent of the investment value. The charge for both taxes and insurance is about ½ to 1 percent. Other costs: The average dollars spent annually for fertilizer, maintaining the forage resource, and any other costs. Worksheet 1 illustrates ownership costs for 160 acres of pasture. The per acre ownership cost of $19.94 establishes an asking lease price for one acre of pasture land. Rent per head is calculated by multiplying the $19.94 by the carrying capacity of the pasture for the type and size of animal being considered. For example, a 625 pound beef animal may require four acres, which would result in $79.76 per head per season (4 acres x $19.94 per acre). Livestock Owner's Return Method For the livestock owner's return method, an enterprise budget is needed to determine how much the livestock owner can afford to pay for pasture rent. Enterprise budgets can be obtained from a Cooperative Extension office if livestock costs and returns are not known. Worksheet 2 illustrates the livestock owner's method. The actual lease rate will probably be a negotiated value somewhere between the landowner's and livestock owner's figures. Establishing Lease Rates: Share of Gains The landowner and livestock owner may be interested in a share arrangement where the risk and probability of additional profit (or loss) is divided between the owners. In such a case, risk can be effectively shifted by basing rent on a fixed amount per pound of gain. To illustrate this type of lease arrangement, 2

assume pasture rent for a yearling steer is $9.00 per month. Total lease charges for a 6- month grazing season would be $54 ($9/month x 6 months). If a 270-pound gain would be a reasonable expectation, pasture rent would be $0.20 per pound of gain ($54 270 lbs.). If the total weight gain turned out better than expected, say 360 pounds, the landowner would receive $72 instead of $54. However, if the animals gained only 180 pounds, the landowner would receive only $36.00. Establishing Rates: Other Factors While each of the previously discussed methods may be used to establish pasture rental rates, there are other factors that influence the actual rental rate. Market Rate: Market rate is the going price established by the bargaining of landowners and livestock owners. Estimated livestock inventories, market prices, and weather conditions are needed to estimate and negotiate the coming year's rental rates. Location, Water, and Landowner Services: The value of water, location, and landowner services are subjective. However, these items have some value to the livestock owner. Pasture location is important if the livestock owner is taking care of the livestock. The cost can be computed by estimating the number of trips per season times the number of miles times cost per mile. The number of trips should consider checking the cattle for health, minerals, and water supply as well as hauling or driving the cattle to and from the pasture. Good quality water in proper locations improves gain. If water supplies go dry in mid-season, provisions must be made for hauling water or removing the animals. Who pays for these types of considerations must be spelled out in the lease agreement. Landowner services vary from only collecting the rent to taking complete care of the livestock during the pasture season. A common method of charging for these types of services is a percentage of the gross rent. Other factors: Rental rates per acre should reflect pasture productivity. Past stocking rates, weed growth, moisture, etc., all affect pasture productivity (stocking rates or carrying capacity). Pastures with low productivity rent for less than highly productive pastures. Conflicts may arise if the livestock owner wants to stock the pasture with the maximum number of head per acre, and the landowner desires a low stocking rate as the rent is a fixed rate per acre. Continuous heavy stocking rates lower the quality of pasture by reducing the stand of grass and allowing weed growth. Pasture rented on a per-head basis establishes a rate which may not adequately recognize differences in stocking rates. The livestock owner desires low stocking rates (higher gain per head) while the landowner desires higher stocking rates to increase income. Stocking rates and cattle weight may be the most important points for both parties to agree upon and enumerate in the lease. Whole tract rentals are often part of a farm containing pasture. The rental rate for whole tracts is established by (1) the rate per head times the number of head allowed per tract or (2) the per acre rate times the number of acres in pasture. Putting the Agreement in Writing It is highly desirable to put the terms of a lease agreement in writing. A written lease agreement enhances understanding and communication between all involved parties, serves as a reminder of the terms originally agreed upon and provides a valuable guide for 3

the heirs if either the landowner or tenant dies. Every lease agreement should include certain items--the names of the parties involved, an accurate description of the property being rented, the beginning and ending dates of the agreement, the amount of rent being paid and the signatures of the parties involved. Furthermore, other provisions (such as the rights and responsibilities of both parties) which provide for most of the concerns of both the landowner and tenant should be included in every lease. Notes... (For More Information) Contact: Jeff Tranel, Ag & Business Management, CSU Network Extension (719) 549-2049, Jeffrey.Tranel@colostate.edu (Updated Auguat 2008) 4

WORKSHEET 1. LANDLORD OWNERSHIP COSTS PER ACRE AND HEAD A. Land Investment: Interest $ 36,000 land value x 6 % $ 2,160.00 Land taxes $ 36,000 land value x 1 % $ 360.00 Land maintenance $ land value x % $ B. Other Investments: Fences $ 4,000 Corrals $ 1,000 $ Total $ 5,000.00 Depreciation $ 5,000 20 years $ 250.00 Interest* $ 5,000 6 % $ 300.00 Repairs $ 5,000 2 % $ 100.00 Taxes $ 10.00 Insurance $ 100.00 C. Other Costs: Fertilizer $ Other $ D. TOTAL OWNERSHIP COSTS $ 3,190.00 E. Number of Pasture Acres: 160 acres F. Ownership Costs/Acre: $ 3,190 total costs 160 acres $ 19.94 G. Stocking Rate: 4 acres per head H. Ownership Costs/Head/Season: $ 19.94 costs/head x 4 acres/head $ 79.76 *A percentage rate of 6% on $5,000 is equal to 12% of the average investment of $2,500. 5

WORKSHEET 1. LANDLORD OWNERSHIP COSTS PER ACRE AND HEAD A. Land Investment: Interest $ land value x % $ Land taxes $ land value x % $ Land maintenance $ land value x % $ B. Other Investments: Fences $ Corrals $ $ Total $ Depreciation $ years $ Interest* $ % $ Repairs $ % $ Taxes $ Insurance $ C. Other Costs: Fertilizer $ Other $ D. TOTAL OWNERSHIP COSTS $ E. Number of Pasture Acres: acres F. Ownership Costs/Acre: $ total costs acres $ G. Stocking Rate: acres per head H. Ownership Costs/Head/Season: $ costs/head x acres/head $ *A percentage rate of 6% on $5,000 is equal to 12% of the average investment of $2,500. 6

WORKSHEET 2. *LIVESTOCK OWNER RETURNS (6-MONTH GRAZING) A. Animal Investment: Animal purchase 625 lbs. x $ 76.00 per cwt. $ 475.00 B. Livestock Costs (as percentage of animal investment): Interest $ 475 x 12% x 6/12 of year $ 28.50 Taxes, vet, ins. misc. $ 475 x 3% $ 14.25 Marketing, hauling $ 475 x 3% $ 14.25 Death loss $ 475 x 1% $ 4.75 C. Breeding Livestock Costs: Depreciation $ years $. Bull charge $. D. Labor-Management: Labor 1 hours x $ 6.00 per hour $ 6.00 Management $ 10.00 E. TOTAL ANIMAL COSTS $ 552.75 F. Income: Animal sold 850 lbs. x $ 72.00 per cwt. $ 612.00 G. Livestock Owner Returns to Pasture Per head (F-E): $ 59.25 H. Stocking Rate: 4 acres/head I. Livestock Owner Returns/Acre/Season: $ 59.25 net returns/head 4 acres/head $ 14.81 *For more detailed budgets, see "Farm Management Budgets" available at your local and state Cooperative Extension office. 7

WORKSHEET 2. *LIVESTOCK OWNER RETURNS (6-MONTH GRAZING) A. Animal Investment: Animal purchase lbs. x $ per cwt. $ B. Livestock Costs (as percentage of animal investment): Interest $ x % x of year $ Taxes, vet, ins. misc. $ x % $ Marketing, hauling $ x % $ Death loss $ x % $ C. Breeding Livestock Costs: Depreciation $ years $ Bull charge $ D. Labor-Management: Labor hours x $ per hour $ Management $ E. TOTAL ANIMAL COSTS $ F. Income: Animal sold lbs. x $ per cwt. $ G. Livestock Owner Returns Per Head to Pasture (F-E): $ H. Stocking Rate: acres/head I. Livestock Owner Returns Per Acre Per Season: $ net returns/head acres/head $ 8