November 18, Andersen Sterilizers, Inc. Dr. William Andersen President 3154 Caroline Drive Haw River, North Carolina 27258

Similar documents
January 3, AtriCure Inc. Melissa Smallwood Associate Regulatory Affairs Specialist 7555 Innovation Way Mason, Ohio 45040

AtriCure Inc. Jonathan McElwee Regulatory Affairs Manger 7555 Innovation Way Mason, Ohio 45040

April 22, Trilliant Surgical, Limited Mr. J.D. Webb President The Orthomedix Group, Incorporated 1001 Oakwood Boulevard Round Rock, Texas 78681

February 22, Dear Dr. Cox:

June 18, Angiodynamics Incorporated Ms. Suzanne Goodman Senior Regulatory Affairs Manager 26 Forest Street Marlborough, Massachusetts 01752

November 9, AtriCure, Inc. Jonathan McElwee Regulatory Affairs Manager 7555 Innovation Way Mason, Ohio 45040

February 17, DSM Biomedical Ms. Brianna Jordan Regulatory Specialist 735 Pennsylvania Drive Exton, Pennsylvania 19341

March 22, Atricure, Inc Mark Job Responsible Third Party Official Regulatory Technology Services, LLC th Street, NW Buffalo, MN 55313

( ~~~~Proprietary Name - Esremp NE

May 22, Ranfac Corporation Mr. Christopher Whelan Senior Vice President 30 Doherty Avenue, P.O. Box 635 Avon, Massachusetts 02322

510(k) Summary for the Tiger Cannulated Screw System

GE Healthcare Special 510(k) Premarket Notification Submission JUL (k) Summary

This letter corrects our substantially equivalent letter of November 25, 2014.

January 13, Texas Medical Technologies, Inc. Consultant Smith Associates 1468 Harwell Avenue Crofton, Maryland 21114

510(k) Summary (c) JAN

510(K) SUMMARY. AMO Brand Multi-Purpose Disinfecting

510(k) Summary NOV

4. 510(k) Summary K to g

I K Number I Trade Name Manufacturer K ADMIRAL XTREME' PTA Invatec Innovative Catheter. 510(k) Summary (c) FEB i1 PREDICATE DEVICE

510(k) SUMMARY. Masimo Corporation 40 Parker Irvine, CA FAX

510(k) Summary JUN K (02R~ 1. General Information 510(k) Owner:

JUN (k) Summary Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland) Inc. "Brilliance Volume" 1. Submitter. 3. Predicate Device Information

510(k) Summary FF

Legally Marketed Predicate: Nervus Monitor (K ) commercial distribution certification dated July 12, 2002.

)Cot Y-9. Atrileu re~ 510(k) Summary JUN General Information. Classification Class 2

DEC K q

Dear Mr. Daniel: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES. Public Health Service

JAN (k) SUMMARY. General Provisions

JUL Sponsor/Applicant Name and Address Penumbra, Inc Harbor Bay Parkway Alameda, CA 94502, USA

02../ 5'"3. 510(k) Summary Cod man BACTISEALTM EVD Catheter Sets. Codli1an & Shurtleff, Inc. 325 Paramount Drive Raynham, MA

510(k) Summary. January 10, 2014

Medical Devices; Gastroenterology-Urology Devices; Classification of the Endoscopic

Medical Devices; Exemption From Premarket Notification; Class II Devices; Over-the-Counter

510(k) Summary Safety and Effectiveness as Required by 21 CFR

Medical Devices; Anesthesiology Devices; Classification of the High Flow Humidified

De Novo Classification Process (Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation) Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

FDA identifies this generic type of device as: Absorbable perirectal spacer.

ONE DEVICE. FIVE FUNCTIONS. BRINGING VALUE WITH VERSATILITY.

Medical Devices; Dental Devices; Classification of the Auto Titration Device for Oral

Advanced Surgical Concepts, Ltd. Jonathan Kahan Hogan Lovells US LLP Columbia Square 555 Thirteenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20004

Medical Devices; General and Plastic Surgery Devices; Classification of the Hemostatic Device

Medical Devices; General and Plastic Surgery Devices; Classification of the Absorbable Lung

ANDREW BALO SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, REGULATORY, BIOMETRICS, & CLINICAL AFFAIRS DEXCOM, INC 6340 SEQUENCE DRIVE SAN DIEGO, CA 92121

Medical Devices; Obstetrical and Gynecological Devices; Classification of the Closed Loop

DEC DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES

Medical Devices; Neurological Devices; Classification of the Non-Electroencephalogram

Medical Devices; Neurological Devices; Classification of the Evoked Photon Image Capture

Medical Devices; Immunology and Microbiology Devices; Classification of Trichomonas

Medical Devices; Obstetrical and Gynecological Devices; Classification of the Software

Medical Devices; Ear, Nose, and Throat Devices; Classification of the Active Implantable

Medical Devices; Cardiovascular Devices; Classification of the Adjunctive Cardiovascular

The FDA/CDRH Perspective in the Regulation of Surgical Mesh

RE: Docket No. FDA 2017 N 0041: Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Safety Assurance Case

Medical Devices; Immunology and Microbiology Devices; Classification of the Nucleic Acid-

Medical Devices; Obstetrical and Gynecological Devices; Classification of the Gynecologic

December 18, 2014 Approval Letter - INTERCEPT Blood System for Platelets

APR Dear Ms. Adair:

Medidée Services SA. Nano-Tera.ch. 05 February 2015 part 8. PMA, 510k, IDE. Pierre-Alain Sommer

Medical Devices; Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Toxicology Devices; Classification of the

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES

Disclosures. Laboratory Stakeholders. IVD vs. LDT. FDA Regulation of Laboratory Developed Tests 10/2/2015. FDA Regulation of LDTs

Medical Devices; Immunology and Microbiology Devices; Classification of the Automated

Medical Devices; Immunology and Microbiology Devices; Classification of the Automated

[[Page 63034]] ======================================================================= DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Medical Devices; Exemption From Premarket Notification; Class II Devices; Autosomal

Document issued on: March 19, The draft of this document was issued on May 20, 2010.

NEW Faster, more versatile!

Draft Guidance for Industry, Clinical Laboratories, and FDA Staff. In Vitro Diagnostic Multivariate Index Assays

Distinguishing Medical Device Recalls from Product Enhancements and Associated Reporting Requirements

The draft of this document was issued on May 15, 2003.

NEW Faster, more versatile!

Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Procedures for Handling Post-Approval Studies Imposed by PMA Order

ASTM D10-F02 Workshop FDA Regulatory Perspective. Patrick Weixel FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Medical Devices; Exemptions From Premarket Notification: Class II Devices

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

DRAFT GUIDANCE. This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Document issued on: July 14, 2011

Compounding Animal Drugs From Bulk Drug Substances; Draft Guidance for Industry;

Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: External Pacemaker Pulse Generator

Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff; The Content of Investigational

Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators and Sponsors

D.L. Woodman, W.K. Andersen, and A.E. May

Customed, Inc 12/9/14

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997: Modifications to the List of

Objectives. The Perioperative Nurse s Role 6/24/2016. Instrument Processing & Sterilization Chesapeake Perioperative Consortium 2016

Table of Contents Adverse Event Reporting SOPs for Medical Devices

Unique Device Identification: Convenience Kits Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

Paths to Market & FDA Product Lifecycle Regulation. Patricia Kaeding Design of Medical Devices University of Minnesota April 14, 2005

Medical Devices; Immunology and Microbiology Devices; Classification of the Brain Trauma

Under this license, you are approved to manufacture aflibercept drug substance intermediate, drug substance, and formulated bulk at

January 24, WARNING LETTER (08-ATL-04 )

Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

CBER Regulation of Devices for Cell Therapy

Medical Device Accessories: Defining Accessories and Classification Pathway for New Accessory Types. Draft Guidance for Industry and

Guidance on Requirements of the Sponsor and the Investigator as a Sponsor

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget

Medical Devices; Immunology and Microbiology Devices; Classification of the Next Generation

~_Awl (99' ~.,..,~., ~.. FEDERAL EXPRES S. Cahill, Dear Mr.

Introduction to the FDA. Historical Context. Changes over Time FDA - BE-200 9/23/2004. Copyright C. S. Tritt, Ph.D. 1

Transcription:

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002 November 18, 2015 Andersen Sterilizers, Inc. Dr. William Andersen President 3154 Caroline Drive Haw River, North Carolina 27258 Re: K150646 Trade/Device Name: EOgas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.6860 Regulation Name: Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: FLF Dated: October 20, 2015 Received: October 22, 2015 Dear Dr. William Andersen: We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading. If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-

Page 2 - Dr. William Andersen related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050. If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/resourcesforyou/industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/safety/reportaproblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance. You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/resourcesforyou/industry/default.htm. Enclosure Sincerely yours, Erin I. Keith -S Erin I. Keith, M.S. Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control, and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: January 31, 2017 See PRA Statement on last page. 510(k) Number (if known) K150646 Device Name EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer, AN4000.01 and AN4000.11 Indications for Use (Describe) The EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer is intended for use in hospitals and other human healthcare settings. It is designed to sterilize reusable medical devices that are sensitive to moisture, heat, chemical corrosion, or radiation. The 3 hour cycle at 50 C in the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer is for surface sterilization of medical devices as well as for the sterilization of single-lumen flexible endoscopes. The critical process parameters for the cycle are summarized in Table 1. Table 1. Critical parameters for the 3 hour cycle in the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer EO Amount Temperature Relative Humidity EO Exposure Time Total Cycle Time 17.6 g ± 5% 50 C ± 3 C 35-70% 3 hours 3.5 hours Maximum loads of specific materials and devices that have been validated are listed in Table 2. All validated maximum loads were processed without additional devices in the sterilizer. Table 2. Load and material types validated in the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer Device Type Maximum Load Device Examples Required Aeration Metal 24 lbs (11 kg) Surgical instruments, Metal instruments do not absorb EO; Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) delicate sharps, including those with hinges and mated surfaces Follow pouch or wrap manufacturer s instructions (Example: Tyvek pouches and Sterisheet wrap require 6 hours at 50 C). Plastic 7.0 lbs (3.2 kg) Reusable power cords, trocars 24 hours at 50 C; Fabric 6.1 lbs (2.8 kg) Reusable cloth gowns, towels Follow manufacturer s instructions Single-lumen One (1) 2.0mm ID Gastrovideoscopes, gastrointestinal 12 hours at 50 C; Endoscope(s) 1100mm length; videoscopes Follow manufacturer s instructions No additional devices Four (4) 1.2 mm ID Bronchoscopes, bronchovideoscopes, 700 mm length; cystoscopes, ureteroscopes, No additional devices choledocoscopes Reusable medical devices must be aerated following the instructions of the device manufacturer and the packaging material manufacturer, then released for use after sterilization based on successful inactivation of an EZTest - Gas Biological Indicator in the Andersen EOGas 4 SteriTest process challenge device. Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. FOR FDA USE ONLY Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature) FORM FDA 3881 (1/14) Page 1 of 2 PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740 EF

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number. FORM FDA 3881 (1/14) Page 2 of 2

510(k) Summary 5.1 Applicant s Name and Address 5.2 Contact Person 5.3 Date of Preparation Andersen Sterilizers, Inc. 3154 Caroline Drive Haw River, NC 27258 William K. Andersen, BE, MD, FAAOS President Phone: 336-376-8622, Fax: 336-376-5428 November 17, 2015 5.4 Device Proprietary Name EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer Models AN4000.01 and AN4000.11 Common Name Ethylene oxide gas sterilizer Classification Class II (21 CFR 880.6860) Medical Specialty General Hospital Product Code FLF The refill kits for the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer, including the accessories (sterilization bags, EOGas 4 cartridges, AN1087 Dosimeters, and Humidichips ), are registered with the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA #69340-7). 5.5 Predicate Device - Sterijet Device Name 510(k) number Manufacturer Sterijet Ethylene Oxide Sterilization System NA Andersen Products, Inc. The Sterijet sterilization system is a pre-amendment predicate (marketed for hospital use in the United States prior to the Medical Device Act). It has been in continuous use for commercial ethylene oxide sterilization since the early 1970 s, although it was taken off the hospital market due to changes in EPA regulation of ethylene oxide-chlorofluorocarbon mixtures. The purpose for this submission is to modify the sterilization bag and the ethylene oxide delivery method compared to the pre-amendment device. No modifications were made to the technology or intended use. Page 1 of 5

5.6 Predicate Device - Steri-Vac 4XL Device Name 510(k) number Manufacturer Steri-Vac 4XL Gas Sterilizer K812867 3M Company The EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Sterilizer uses a flexible sterilization bag as a sterilization chamber, whereas the predicate device has a fixed sterilization chamber. The principles of operation, intended use, and technology are otherwise substantially equivalent. 5.7 Device Description The EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer, model AN4000.01 (115V) or AN4000.11 (230V), is intended to sterilize moisture, temperature, chemical corrosion, or radiation-sensitive reusable medical devices in healthcare facilities. The sterilant is a unit dose of 100% ethylene oxide contained in a cartridge, and the sterilization chamber is a gas-impervious flexible sterilization bag. Each sterilization cycle is monitored using cumulative gas exposure measurement (AN1087 Dosimeter), as well as a Bacillus atrophaeus biological indicator (AN2203) inserted into a process challenge device (AN7408.14 Andersen EOGas 4 Steritest) that is integrated into the sterilizer. 5.8 Indications for Use The EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer is intended for use in hospitals and other human healthcare settings. It is designed to sterilize reusable medical devices that are sensitive to moisture, heat, chemical corrosion, or radiation. The 3 hour cycle at 50 C in the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer is for surface sterilization of medical devices as well as for the sterilization of single-lumen flexible endoscopes. The critical process parameters for the cycle are summarized in Table 5-1. Table 5-1. Critical parameters for the 3 hour cycle in the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer Relative EO Exposure Total Cycle EO Amount Temperature Humidity Time Time 17.6 g ± 5% 50 C ± 3 C 35-70% 3 hours 3.5 hours Page 2 of 5

Maximum loads of specific materials and devices that have been validated are listed in Table 5-2. All validated maximum loads were processed without additional devices in the sterilizer. Table 5-2. Load and material types validated in the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer Device Type Maximum Load Device Examples Required Aeration Metal Plastic Fabric Single-lumen Endoscope(s) 24 lbs (11 kg) 7.0 lbs (3.2 kg) 6.1 lbs (2.8 kg) One (1) 2.0 mm internal diameter 1100 mm length; No additional devices Four (4) 1.2 mm internal diameter 700 mm length; No additional devices Surgical instruments, delicate sharps, including those with hinges and mated surfaces Reusable power cords, trocars Reusable cloth gowns, towels Gastrovideoscopes, gastrointestinal videoscopes Bronchoscopes, bronchovideoscopes, cystoscopes, ureteroscopes, choledocoscopes Metal instruments do not absorb EO; Follow pouch or wrap manufacturer s instructions for aeration requirements (Examples: Tyvek pouches and Sterisheet wrap require 6 hours aeration at 50 C). 24 hours at 50 C; Follow manufacturer s instructions 12 hours at 50 C; Follow manufacturer s instructions Reusable medical devices must be aerated following the instructions of the device manufacturer and the packaging material manufacturer, then released for use after sterilization based on successful inactivation of an EZTest - Gas Biological Indicator in the Andersen EOGas 4 SteriTest process challenge device. 5.9 Substantial Equivalence Comparison The EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices: the Sterijet Ethylene Oxide Sterilization System and the Steri-Vac 4XL Gas Sterilizer, because all three sterilizers are intended for the same use, designed in a similar way, use the same technology, and perform substantially equivalently. The EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer differs from the predicate Sterijet sterilizer in the use of a sterilization bag that is ethylene oxide impermeable and gas delivery from a cartridge rather than direct injection. The EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer differs from the predicate Steri-Vac 4XL sterilizer in the use of a flexible sterilization bag rather than a fixed sterilization chamber, and the use of approximately 20% of the ethylene oxide per cycle that is used in the predicate. These differences raise no issues related to safety or effectiveness of the subject device sterilization cycle. A comparison among the sterilizers is listed in Table 5-3. Page 3 of 5

Table 5-3. Comparison among the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer, the Sterijet Ethylene Oxide Sterilization System, and the Steri-Vac 4XL Gas Sterilizer Sterijet System 4XL Sterilizer EOGas 4 Sterilizer Comparison Intended Use Indoor ethylene oxide sterilizer in a healthcare setting Same Indications for Use Design Technology Biological Monitoring Safety Performance Sterile processing of reusable medical devices using ethylene oxide Gas injection cabinet and aerator Injection of EO from a tank; amount depending on bag size Flexible sterilization chamber Gas-diffusion bag Use EO as sterilant; EPA registered Sterilization of heat and/or moisture sensitive devices using ethylene oxide Sterilization of reusable medical devices that are sensitive to moisture, heat, chemical corrosion, or radiation Similar design for exterior and cabinet Unit dose EO Fixed sterilization chamber EO impervious chamber Unit dose EO Flexible sterilization chamber EO impervious bag Critical parameters: EO concentration, RH, temperature, and time N/A 3M Attest EO Pack placed in the load; resistance equivalent to an AAMI routine syringe test pack AN7408.14 process challenge device integrated into the sterilizer; resistance greater than the validated worst-case loads in the sterilizer Verify compliance for electromagnetic compatibility and electrical safety Sterilize reusable medical devices as labeled to a SAL of 10-6 with reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness Equivalent Equivalent. Similar designs with flexible chamber and unit dose EO in the EOGas 4 sterilizer Same Equivalent: confirm appropriate sterilization parameters have been met. Same Equivalent 5.10 Performance Testing The EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer has been validated using applicable tests in the FDA 1993 Guidance on Premarket Notification [510(k)] Submissions for Sterilizers Intended for Use in Health Care Facilities. The maximum loads of metal, fabric, plastic, and single-lumen flexible endoscopes that may be routinely sterilized in the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer were defined and validated. Using the 3 hour cycle at 50 C, the EOGas 4 sterilization system reproducibly and effectively sterilizes 24 lbs of metal instruments with or without mated surfaces, 6.1 lbs of fabric, 7.0 lbs of Page 4 of 5

plastic devices, and four 1.2 x 700 mm endoscopes or one 2 x 1100 mm endoscope, achieving a minimum sterility assurance level of 10-6. All validated maximum loads were processed without additional devices in the sterilizer. The Andersen process challenge device, consisting of a BI receptacle with a self-contained biological indicator, was developed for the 3 hr cycle at 50 C in the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer. It represents a rigorous challenge to the EOGas 4 sterilization process as it impedes gas diffusion, heating, and humidification. Its resistance characteristics are greater than the same BI placed in the worst-case location in each of the worst-case validation loads. The validation testing demonstrated that exposure to EO gas under the defined loads and physical parameters achieved a minimum sterility assurance level (SAL) of 10-6 for surfaces, mated surfaces, and endoscope lumens. The effectiveness of the sterilization process for the loads was confirmed by successful sterilization in simulated-use testing using instruments with mated surfaces as well as endoscope lumens. In addition, in-use testing confirmed the ability of the cycle to sterilize single-lumen endoscopes used clinically in a hospital setting. Process residue analysis showed that the majority of EO or ethylene chlorohydrin residuals remaining on even the most absorbent materials tested in the study met the requirements of AAMI/ANSI/ISO 10993-7, demonstrating that the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer and its accessories are safe to use if the guidance and instructions are followed. The EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer was tested to verify compliance with requirements for electromagnetic compatibility and electrical safety. Physical performance tests demonstrated that the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer, EOGas cartridges, sterilization bags, and Humidichips met their performance specifications. The EOGas 4 sterilization system achieved and maintained the cycle specifications for EO concentration, temperature, time, and relative humidity. Both the sterilizer and the accessories consistently operated in accordance with predetermined criteria. The 3 hour cycle at 50 C in the EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer was repeatable and reliable under the indicated test load conditions. Conclusion: The EOGas 4 Ethylene Oxide Gas Sterilizer is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices. Page 5 of 5