Wastewater Nitrogen Characteristics, Treatment and Removal Options. Bob Smith, Orenco Systems, Inc. GEC 2013

Similar documents
The difference in unit processes for a traditional on-lot wastewater treatment system compared to the AdvanTex Treatment System

WASTEWATER 101 Fo r MOWA

OWEA 2013 Technical Conference and Exposition June 18 21, 2013

General Information on Nitrogen

ENGINEERING OWTS FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL. Simon Farrell, PE, REHS JVA Consulting Engineers March 27, 2015 CPOW mini conference

Secondary Treatment Process Control

NITROGEN REMOVAL GUIDE FOR WASTEWATER OPERATORS THE WATER PLANET COMPANY FORMS OF NITROGEN OF INTEREST TO WASTEWATER OPERATORS

CE 370. Wastewater Characteristics. Quality. Wastewater Quality. The degree of treatment depends on: Impurities come from:

ONSITE TREATMENT. Amphidrome

Commercial Treatment Systems

CE421/521 Environmental Biotechnology. Nitrogen and Phosphorus Cycles Lecture Tim Ellis

Triplepoint Environmental

Commercial Treatment Systems

Nitrogen Removal Using Saturated Upflow Woody Fiber Media

with sewage effluent Nutrient enrichment ( Eutrophication ) Algal Blooms Deaeration of the watercourse oxidation of ammonia a potable.

CTB3365x Introduction to Water Treatment

COMPARISON OF SBR AND CONTINUOUS FLOW ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL

SIMPLE and FLEXIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS And PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT for OXIDATION DITCH UPGRADES

Nitrogen, Septic Systems, Great Bay and Why it Matters

ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF OXIDATION DITCHES. Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E., DEE Professor of Environmental Engineering The University of Memphis

WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM

Presentation Outline

BASICS OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT

JTAC Presentation May 18, Nutrient Removal Process Fundamentals and Operation

A general Description of the IAWQ activated sludge model No.1

General Operational Considerations in Nutrient and Wet Weather Flow Management for Wastewater Treatment Facilities Part II

operation of continuous and batch reactors. Contrary to what happens in the batch reactor, the substrate (BOD) of the wastewater in the continuous rea

Appendix D JWPCP Background and NDN

Upgrading Lagoons to Remove Ammonia, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus *nutrient removal in cold-climate lagoon systems

Treatment performance of advanced onsite wastewater treatment systems in the Otsego Lake watershed, 2008 results

OCTOBER 31, NAMI Environmental Conference BEST PRACTICES: IMPROVING WW SYSTEMS

Biological Nutrient Removal Operations. December 9 th, 2015 Presenter Georgine Grissop PE, BCEE

Best Practice in Sewage and Effluent Treatment Technologies

Removal of High C and N Contents in Synthetic Wastewater Using Internal Circulation of Anaerobic and Anoxic/Oxic Activated Sludge Processes

Designing Single-Sludge Bionutrient Removal Systems

Short-Cut Nitrogen Removal: A State of the Art Review

Energy Savings Through Denitrification

NITROGEN REMOVAL USING TERTIARY FILTRATION. Suzie Hatch & Colum Kearney. Sydney Water Corporation

Making Your Plant Denitrify

We Know Water. AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) and ANITA Mox Deammonification

NITROGEN REMOVAL USING SATURATED UPFLOW WOODY FIBER MEDIA. Larry D. Stephens, P.E. 1

Media Filters Fundamentals

Performance of Passive Wastewater and Groundwater Nitrex TM Nitrogen Removal System. Pio Lombardo

Treatment performance of advanced onsite wastewater treatment systems in the Otsego Lake watershed, 2009 results update 1

Future Directions In Wastewater Treatment

A Battle to Be the Best: A Comparison of Two Powerful Sidestream Treatment Technologies: Post Aerobic Digestion and Anammox

Chapter 9 Nitrification

Department of Civil Engineering-I.I.T. Delhi CVL723 Problem Set_2_Feb6_15

Upgrade of an Oxidation Ditch Using Bio-Mass Carriers

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

Mainstream ANITA Mox Pilot Testing at Los Angeles County Joint Water Pollution Control Plant. Meg Hollowed Veolia Water Technologies

Chapter 3: Advanced Wastewater Treatment for Nitrogen Removal

2015 Spring Conference

Wastewater Terms for Permit Applications

Ammonia Removal and ph Adjustment in Aerated Lagoons

Nutrient Removal Optimization at the Fairview WWTP

ADVANCING NOVEL PROCESSES FOR BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT REMOVAL

THE DEMON ANAMMOX PROCESS: RESOURCE SAVINGS THROUGH SIDE STREAM TREATMENT, AND THE STEPS TOWARDS AN ENERGY NEUTRAL WWTP PRESENTED AT: NC AWWA-WEA 97

Wastewater Pollutants & Treatment Processes. Dr. Deniz AKGÜL Marmara University Department of Environmental Engineering

TRICKLING FILTER WITH HEXAGONAL CLOSE - PACKED MEDIA FOR THE TREATMENT OF DOMESTIC WASTEWATERS JOAN DOLLY CHUNG ZIE WEI

CSR Process Simulations Can Help Municipalities Meet Stringent Nutrient Removal Requirements

WWTP Side Stream Treatment of Nutrients Considerations for City of Raleigh s Bioenergy Recovery Project. Erika L. Bailey, PE, City of Raleigh

AdvanTex AX-RT Treatment Systems

Bio-Lair for Water Remediation

1/11/2016. Types and Characteristics of Microorganisms. Topic VI: Biological Treatment Processes. Learning Objectives:

TDS AND SLUDGE GENERATION IMPACTS FROM USE OF CHEMICALS IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Lagoons Operation and Management in New Brunswick

Application of the AGF (Anoxic Gas Flotation) Process

Recirculating Aquaculture Systems

Biological Wastewater Treatment Processes II: MBBR Processes

An Innovative Approach to Retrofitting for Nitrogen Removal

TWO YEARS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH AN ADVANCED MSBR SYSTEM AT THE SHENZHEN YANTIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

WASTEWATER FROM CARBON CAPTURE SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT

A SUBMERGED ATTACHED GROWTH BIOREACTOR FOR DECENTRALIZED WASTEWATER TREATMENT

MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN RODNEY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Andrea Nifong, World Water Works (formerly HRSD) Stephanie Klaus, VT & HRSD

Overview of Supplemental Carbon Sources for Denitrification and Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal

A Critical New Look at Nutrient Removal Processes

Use of Biowin for Process Troubleshooting / Design for a Unique Wastewater

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Sludge recycling (optional) Figure Aerobic lagoon

Probabilistic Modeling of Two-Stage Biological Nitrogen Removal Process: Formulation of Control Strategy for Enhanced Process Certainty

Modelling of Wastewater Treatment Plants

EHS SMART-Treat Onsite Moving Media Treatment System

Nutrients, biology and elemental stoichiometry

Waste Water Treatment Plant Overview and Tour

ENVE 302 Environmental Engineering Unit Processes DENITRIFICATION

Passive, Two-stage Nitrogen Reduction Systems for Onsite Wastewater Treatment

NITROGEN REMOVAL GRANT WEAVER, PE & WWTP OPERATOR PRESIDENT THE WATER PLANET COMPANY. Create Optimal Habitats

ECO Smart Aerobic Waste Water Treatment System. Optimising the re-use and recycling of waste water

Activated Sludge Process Control: Nitrification

Nitrogen Removal with the Waterloo Biofilter

Advanced Onsite Wastewater Treatment Overview

State of the Technology

Small Community Wastewater Collection and Treatment Alternatives

Biological Phosphorus Removal Technology. Presented by: Eugene Laschinger, P.E.

Enhanced Nitrogen Removal Using Upflow Biological Filtration

Basic knowledge of Wastewater

Transcription:

Wastewater Nitrogen Characteristics, Treatment and Removal Options Bob Smith, Orenco Systems, Inc. GEC 2013 ##/##/#### #1

Nitrogen Nitrogen (N 2 ) in the environment exists primarily in the earth s atmosphere as a colorless, tasteless, and generally inert gas Air, by volume, is composed of about 78.08% nitrogen, with oxygen (O 2 ) following at about 20.95% Nitrogen is assimilated (absorbed/digested) and/or fixed from the air in living things ##/##/#### #2

Nitrogen Soil bacteria and ocean algae are primary fixers; nitrogen gas N 2 > Organic-N Nitrogen is a constituent of DNA and therefore, an essential element for life. Carbon, Oxygen, Nitrogen, Hydrogen, and Phosphorus, by weight, compose over 99% of microbial cell structure. ##/##/#### #3

Nitrogen in Urine and Feces Urine contributes about 75%+ of the nitrogen found in domestic wastewater Feces contributes about 20% ± of the nitrogen. Source separation can be an effective strategy. ##/##/#### #4

Nitrogen Family Organic nitrogen Organic-N Ammonium nitrogen NH + 4 Ammonia nitrogen NH 3 -N Nitrite nitrogen NO 2 -N Nitrate nitrogen NO 3 -N ##/##/#### #5

Total Nitrogen (TN) TN = Organic N + NH 3 -N + NO 2 -N + NO 3 -N Total Inorganic Nitrogen TIN = NH 3 -N + NO 2 -N + NO 3 -N ##/##/#### #6

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) TKN = Organic-N + NH 3 -N Therefore Organic-N = TKN - NH 3 -N And TN = TKN + NO 2 -N + NO 3 -N ##/##/#### #7

Ammonification Ammonification is the transformation of organic nitrogen to ammonium (NH 4 ) and ammonia (NH 3 ) inorganic forms, depending on ph levels. The initial phase of ammonification occurs in the septic environment of the primary tankage (70% ±) and about 3/4 th of the remaining organic nitrogen is converted to ammonia through the secondary aerobic process. ##/##/#### #8

Ammonification Urea is transformed to ammonia as follows: CH 4 N 2 O + H 2 O > 2NH 3 + CO 2 ##/##/#### #9

Nitrification Nitrification is the microbial conversion of ammonium to nitrate. Nitrification is a two-phase process that occurs in the highly aerobic environment of secondary and advanced treatment processes ##/##/#### #10

Nitrification In the first phase, ammonium oxidizing autotrophic bacteria known as nitrosomonas convert ammonia to nitrite in the following manner 2NH 4 + + 30 2 nitrosomonas > 2NO 2 - + 4H + + 2H 2 O. In the second phase of nitrification, a nitrite oxidizing bacteria known as nitrobactor converts nitrite to nitrate as follows: 2NO 2 - + 0 2 nitrobactor > 2NO 3 - ##/##/#### #11

Denitrification Denitrification is the microbial utilization of nitrate under anoxic conditions. Denitrification is a multi-stage process where nitrate (NO 3- ) is reduced to nitrogen gas (N 2 ), which is liberated back into the atmosphere after rising to the liquid surface in tiny bubbles. ##/##/#### #12

Alternate Metabolic Pathways Anammox is an anaerobic ammonia oxidation process where nitrite and ammonia react and are converted to nitrogen gas and water, as follows NH 4 + + NO 2 - > N 2 gas + 2H 2 O The nitrite supply must be steady, and can be provide through partial nitrification or denitrification. ##/##/#### #13

Typical Residential-Strength Influent* From Building Sewer BOD 5 mg/l TSS mg/l TN mg/l G&O mg/l TP mg/l Raw Influent 450 500 70 160 17 * Small and Decentralized Wastewater Management Systems, Crites & Tchobanoglous, p. 180, 1998. ##/##/#### #14

Commercial Concentrations Commercial workplace flows typically ranging 6 to 12 gpd/person, or higher depending on the type of facility. With current practices to utilize water conserving low flow fixtures, commercial concentrations, after primary treatment, are likely to be in the order of 400 to 500 mg/l± BOD 5 180 to 220 mg/l± TKN 50 to 70 mg/l± TP These concentrations correlate well with field-measured concentrations from offices, rest stops, manufacturing and other similar facilities where the primary wastewater flows is primarily from toilets and urinals. ##/##/#### #15

Nitrification What s Needed Adequate aeration volume for solids retention time (SRT > 8-10 days typical of suspended growth) Sufficient aeration capacity for needed dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration (4.57 mg O 2 /mg NH 3 -N) Sufficient alkalinity/ph, (7.14 mg alkalinity as CaCO 3 per mg NH 4 -N oxidized ph >6) No significant toxicity (e.g. trace organics, chlorides, ) Temperature control above 45 F ##/##/#### #16

Oxygen Availability in Air 275 mg/l oxygen in free air, which directly interfaces with the biomass... in contrast to 9 mg/l DO holding capacity of water for oxygen transfer ##/##/#### #17

Nitrification Limiting Factors: High organic concentrations BOD, COD, etc Lack of sufficient dissolved oxygen DO greater than 2 mg/l is preferred Insufficient alkalinity filtrate CaCO 3 should be around 100 mg/l or greater Low ph maintain greater than 6, with optimum range between 7.2 and 9 Low Temperature should be 10 C or higher Toxic Inhibitors e.g., high chloride levels (keep below 180 mg/l) ##/##/#### #18

Nitrifier Population vs BOD 5 /TKN ratio Ratio of Carbon to Nitrogen Percentage of Total Population 0.5 35% 2.5 10% 5.5 5% 10 2.5% ##/##/#### #19

Nitrification Reaction Rate vs BOD/TKN 1.2 1 Nitrifier Fraction f n ; Nitrification Rate R n 0.8 0.6 0.4 R n 0.2 f n 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 C/N Ratio ##/##/#### #20

Effect of DO on Nitrification DO greater than 2 mg/l is preferred 1.00 DO Effect on Nitrification 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 DO, mg/l ##/##/#### #21

Effect of ph on Nitrifiers Filtrate alkalinity (CaCO 3 ) should be maintained at 80-100 mg/l or greater for optimum nitrification Maintain ph above 6, with optimum between 7.2 and 9 for nitrification ph effect on Nitrification Rate R n 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ph ##/##/#### #22

Temperature Effect on Nitrifiers Winter effluent temperature should be 10 C or higher 2.50 Temperature Effect on Nitrification Growth Rate µ n 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 T, C ##/##/#### #23

Nitrification with Packed Bed Filters Packed bed filters have demonstrated a strong ability to reduce residential strength ammonia (40 to 55 mg/l) by 98 to 99% When that expected level appears to degrade by 5% or more, servicing is likely necessary, as well as an investigation into flow and strength capacities and/or other inhibiting factors (like over use of household cleaners, carpet cleaning, insufficient alkalinity, ph drop, etc.). ##/##/#### #24

Packed Bed Filter Biofilms At the surface and within the top 6 inches±, matter is trapped and the greatest biofilm accumulation occurs The top zone is mostly responsible for solids and organic reduction Heterotrophic bacteria are primarily responsible for reducing organic matter ##/##/#### #25

Packed Bed Filter Biofilms Oxygen is diffused from the air that fills the unsaturated voids into the effluent and biofilms. (Oxygen concentration in air 275 mg/l) After the carbonaceous demand is met in the upper levels of the media, inorganic constituents such as ammonia (NH 3 ) is reduced to nitrate (NO 3 ) by autotrophic bacteria conversion of ammonia to nitrate) in the lower region of the media ##/##/#### #26

Typical PBF Recirculation Configuration ##/##/#### #27

TEST CENTER SUMMARY AdvanTex Effluent Averages Total N mg/l NH 3 -N mg/l Total P mg/l Duration NSF/ANSI Standard 40 12 (64%) 0.9 (96%) - 7 months NSF/ANSI Standard 40 Testing with UV Novatec Nitrogen Removal Testing Rotorua District Council Approval Testing 13 (66%) 1.1-6 months 10 (70%) - - 1 year 14(78%) 0.2 (99%) 8 (36%) 13 months Rotorua 2010 12.7 (78%) 0.6 (96%) ##/##/#### #28

FIELD TESTING SUMMARY AdvanTex Effluent Averages (no. of SFRs) Total N mg/l NH 3 -N mg/l Total P mg/l Duration NSF Pennsylvania Testing Program (11) 17 (68%) 1.7 (96%) - 1-3 years Virginia Approval Testing Program (13) 15 1.8-18 months Jefferson County, CO Health Dept Permit Testing (43) Skaneateles, NY Demonstration Project (2) 15 - - 2 years 7 months 14 0.9 10 2 years 2 months La Pine, OR Demonstration Project (3) 17 (74%) 1.9 9 (18%) 2 years 7 months Rhode Island Demonstration Project (5) 18-9 1 year 4 months Maryland BAT Testing AX20 (12) 17 1 year 5 months Maryland BAT Testing AX20RT (12) 14 1.3 1 year ##/##/#### #29

Typical AdvanTex Recirc-Filters 60 to 70 % total nitrogen reduction without supplemental inputs To reach concentrations below 10 to 15 mg/l, apply specific engineering practices for nitrogen removal ##/##/#### #30

Two-Stage PBF Configuration ##/##/#### #31

PFB w/ Pre-Anoxic Denite-Recirculation Loop ##/##/#### #32

Denitrification Key Limiting Factors: Insufficient organic concentrations [C/N ratio ranges from 4 to 8 g BOD 5 / g (NO 3 -N)] Excessive dissolved oxygen (anoxic DO < 1 mg/l optimum DO < 0.3 mg/l) Temperature (keep above 45 F preferably 50 F) ##/##/#### #33

Effect of DO on Denitrification 1.20 DO Effect on Denitrification 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 DO, mg/l ##/##/#### #34

Why Recirculate Treated Effluent? To optimize wastewater treatment To blend and dilute influent concentrations, which promotes more efficient hydrolysis To introduce nitrified effluent where there is a free carbon concentration and potential for supporting denitrification. To accomplish greater ammonia and total nitrogen removal To accomplish greater carbon reduction through denitrification utilization of 4 or more mg BOD 5 per mg nitrate removed. ##/##/#### #35

Supplements for Nitrogen Removal The effectiveness of nitrification is very dependent upon alkalinity/ph, and the effectiveness of denitrification is very dependent on an organic food source both of which often requires a chemical feed system designed to consistently dispense appropriate quantities of various buffering and carbon based compounds. Chemical feed systems provide a common and effective low cost means for disinfection. ##/##/#### #36

Supplemental Alkalinity Buffering Compounds Compounds Alk-Ratio ppm/ppm CaCO 3 Soda Ash 1.06 Acetate 0.82 Hydrated Lime 0.74 Quick Lime 0.56 Bicarbonate 1.68 Caustic Soda 0.80 Magnesium Hydroxide 0.50 ##/##/#### #37

Supplemental Carbon Sources Methanol (CH 3 OH) : 6.6 lb/gal 1,118,000 mg/l COD Ethanol (CH 3 OH) : 6.8 lb/gallon 1,650,000 mg/l COD MicroC (CH 3 CO 2 Hxx): 9.56 lb/gal 600,000 mg/l COD Acetic Acid (CH 3 OOH): 8.8 lb/gal 1,120,000 mg/l COD ##/##/#### #38

System Description Multiple Pass, packed bed Engineered textile Combines Textile filter media Recirculation tank Discharge tank Textile Media Recirculation Side Discharge Side ##/##/#### #39

Applications Repairs and retrofits Small sites and poor soils Sites that require shallow bury Residential Strength Wastewater (up to and including 500 gpd) ##/##/#### #40

Questions? ##/##/#### #41