INDIANA S INTERMODAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Stephen C. Smith Planning Manager, Transportation Planning Division Indiana Department of Transportation

Similar documents
FHWA Programs Supporting Freight

MAP 21 Freight Provisions and Seaports

Florida Multimodal Statewide Freight Model

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN 2017

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

Regional Performance Measures Annual Progress Report TPO Board - 2/4/2016 Presentation by: Chris Wichman, Senior Planner

Chapter 1 Introduction

Chapter 3 - Goals, Objectives, & Strategies

Performance Measures for Transportation Planning Part 1

Freight Plans Planning, Preparing Staying Ahead. MAASTO July, 2013

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: DRAFT KEY POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS

PROJECTS. The KIPDA MPO s Central Location

2017 Freight System Plan

AASHTO Policy Papers Topic IX: Freight

Highest Priority Performance Measures for the TPP

SIS Policy & Implementation

Oklahoma Long Range Transportation Plan

GDOT-Office of Planning Update

Freight Handler to the Nation. Freight Planning in the Chicago Metropolitan Area

GUIDING PRINCIPLES MEMORANDUM

6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN. Greater Houston Freight Committee Kick-Off Meeting

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #1. The Vision, Goals and Objectives for Rail Transportation in Missouri

Chapter 5 - Needs Assessment and Freight Forecast

2010 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan. Minnesota Department of Transportation

Minnesota s Statewide Freight System Plan and Freight Investment Plan

2. Goals and Objectives

Minnesota Statewide Freight System Plan Action Agenda Development Lead Agency (MnDOT or

Ohio Department of Transportation Ohio Statewide Freight Study/ Plan

Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan

Future of Transportation in Florida

Mobility and System Reliability Goal

Statewide Multi-Modal Freight Model

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE

Transportation Advisory Board May 21, 2014

WTP Phase 2 Implementation & Freight System Plan

INTEGRATING FREIGHT IN CORRIDOR PLANNING AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. Steve Linhart, AICP Caroline Mays, AICP

Highway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan. TAB September 20, 2017

Multimodal Freight Transportation Policy Overview

Central Minnesota Regional Freight Forum. May 17, :00 P.M. 5:30 P.M. St. Cloud, MN

I-710 Project Committee Meeting

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

Livability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update. Transportation Policy Board (TPB) August 23, 2018

New Mexico Statewide Model

Tri-County Regional Planning Commission 2045 Regional Metropolitan Transportation Plan Goals and Objectives Adopted March 22, 2017

Chapter 10 Goals, Objectives + Policies

FDOT FREIGHT PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Northeast Rail Operations Study (NEROps)

Virginia Critical Rural and Urban Freight Corridor Designation WebEx Discussion. September 28, 2017, 10:30 12:00

Appendix O Congestion Management Program REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION. AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)

CHAPTER 2. VISION, GOALS AND MTP FRAMEWORK

Technical Team Meeting #1 September 4, 2014

TRB Panel on the Future of the Interstate

Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF MAPS CHAPTER 1: REGIONAL GOODS MOVEMENT: LINKS TO OUR PAST AND TO OUR FUTURE

What is Intermodal Freight Transportation? Intermodal freight transportation is the movement of freight using more than one mode of travel where all p

North Carolina Statewide Freight Plan

BACKGROUNDER #6: Moving Goods & Services

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Memphis MPO March 30, 2015

Corridor Planning Organizations and Ports I-95 Corridor: A Marine Highway Corridor

Wisconsin Statewide Model

VISION STATEMENT, MISSION STATEMENT, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Moving the first state forward! Delaware s Statewide Long- Range Transportation Plan November 17, 2010 WILMAPCO Our Town

Freight and Rail Stakeholder Webinar. January 7, 2014

Massachusetts Rail Plan. September 16, 2010

GIS-based Modeling for Statewide and Corridor Freight Planning

G MAP A COMPREHENSIVE GOODS MOVEMENT ACTION PROGRAM FOR THE NEW YORK-NEW JERSEY METROPOLITAN REGION

Freight Performance Measures. Task 3 DRAFT Technical Memorandum. August, 2015

Chapter IX Regional Performance

Rail Intermodal Keeps America Moving

I-95 Corridor Coalition

September Public Meetings. Developing a Blueprint for the Corridor

P4.0 Highway Quantitative Scoring Workgroup Recommendations

Chapter 8 - The Decision-Making Process

Innovations in Freight Planning and Project Prioritization

2. Establish an Office of Capital Program and Performance Measurement. 3. Retain planners and capital program planning in modal offices

Modeling Applications for Freight Tennessee DOT Freight Planning

Marine Transportation System Infrastructure Investment A State Perspective. August 28, 2012 Sean T. Connaughton Secretary of Transportation

Chapter 6 Freight Plan

AMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA

LOUISIANA FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN Donald Vary. March 1, 2016

Project Application. General Information ODOT PID. Primary County (3 char abrv) HAM/CLE HAM/CLE HAM ODOT. District. Project Manager (Contact Person)

Freight Planning and Performance Measures: Historical Context and Statewide Perspectives

2014 Minnesota Statewide Freight Summit

Ohio 21 st Century Transportation System It s Ours to Create!

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century MAP-21

FREIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS W.E. # C

MAP-21 themes. Strengthens America s highway and public transportation systems. Creates jobs and supports economic growth

Darrell Wilson AVP Government Relations The Future of Freight Panel August 26 th, 2014

IDOT PERFORMANCE BASED PROJECT METRICS. February 2018

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM

Abstract. 1 Definition of Intermodal Transportation

Project Application Guidelines. For the. Major New Capacity Program

Northern Virginia Region Draft Needs Summary

FINAL REPORT A METHODOLOGY FOR STATEWIDE INTERMODAL FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION PLANNING. Christopher J. Eatough Graduate Research Assistant

LATTS II - Freight Investment Decision Principles

Development of the I-70 Corridor of National Significance

Statewide Achievements

Florida s Market for New Transportation. New Corridors Charrette August 14-15, 2006

Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT) 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

Transcription:

96 INDIANA S INTERMODAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Stephen C. Smith Planning Manager, Transportation Planning Division Indiana Department of Transportation Indiana is in the process of developing an Intermodal Management System (IMS) to evaluate the performance of intermodal transportation investment alternatives as part of the statewide transportation planning process. The nation s transportation system is experiencing a major shift from our historical emphasis on individual modes to that of intermodalism as a means of increasing economic competitiveness by minimizing the cost of transportation. Since 1980 transportation spending relative the Gross National Product has declined from approximately 20 percent to 16 percent. A portion of this decrease in the relative cost of transportation is due to the improvements in transportation productivity due to increased intermodal operations. Examples of the productivity increases resulting from intermodal operations can be seen in the rail industry, where rail container and truck-trailer-on-flat-car movements increased by 80 percent over the last 10 years. The development of the IMS is intended to enable the Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT) to strengthen the state s economy and competitiveness by identifying the most effective transportation improvements. The Transportation Planning Division is taking the lead in the development of the IMS. This work is an extension of the Division s earlier statewide transportation plan Transportation In Indiana: Multimodal Plan Development For The 1990's and Beyond, adopted December 21, 1994. The IMS development will involve the cooperative effort of the Divisions of Information Services, Intermodal Transportation and Roadway Management. Coordination will also occur with the Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) which conduct a comprehensive transportation planning process in the states twelve (12) urbanized areas (population over 50,000). Each MPO prepares a transportation plan to develop a integrated intermodal transportation system that facilitates the efficient movement of people and goods. The IMS will provide a planning resource for the MPO planning efforts and a coordinating mechanism for the planning of intermodal facilities and systems of statewide significance. The IMS is one of the six (6) management systems mandated by the 1991 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA). The federal regulations require each state to prepare a work program by October 1, 1994, develop performance measures and have data collection underway by October 1, 1995, and have a fully operational IMS by October 1, 1996. In addition, special efforts are also required to coordinate the development of the IMS with the Congestion Management System, and the Public Transportation Facilities and Equipment Management System. Currently the department has prepared a work program to develop the IMS and is in process of retaining the services of a consultant to assist INDOT in implementing the system.

97 INTERMODAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ADVISORY GROUP The IMS will establish an Advisory IMS Committee made up of key private sector modal spokespersons, intermodal association representatives, and MPOs to provide policy direction. The establishment of the Advisory IMS Committee is especially critical due to the need to develop an understanding of the private sector decision making for modal and intermodal transportation improvements. In is envisioned that the Advisory IMS Committee will play a major role throughout the entire study in the identification of intermodal problem areas, developing private sector data sources, and overseeing the evaluation of alternative strategies and actions. IMS DEFINITION The Intermodal Management System (IMS) is a systematic process that provides efficient, safe, and convenient movement of people and goods through the integration of transportation facilities and systems. Such a system improves the coordination in planning, and implementation of air, water, and various land-based transportation facilities and systems. An intermodal transportation system should be viewed from the perspective of the total trip. In intermodal planning, transfers between modes, as well as the policy and service interactions among modes, are identified. The IMS is a systematic process of: Identifying key linkages between one or more modes of transportation, where the performance of one mode will affect another. Defining strategies for improving the effectiveness of these modal interactions. Evaluating and implementing these strategies to enhance the overall performance of the transportation system.

98 IMS COMPONENTS Delineate Transportation Corridors Identifying the transportation corridors traversing the State is a key initial step in defining the system. This process will identify all the corridors that have regional and multimodal significance and serve large volumes of demand. The following modal system corridors will be defined both by commodity movement ( for example the volume of steel, coal, manufactured goods by standard industrial code, and agricultural products) and vehicular movement: 1. Rail Infrastructure-freight and passenger rail service 2. Highway Infrastructure-motor vehicle-commercial trucking and private auto 3. Waterways and marine transportation 4. Air service-freight and passenger 5. Pipelines 6. Communication linkages-fiber optic networks The identification of statewide transportation corridors of freight movements was initiated in 1992 through the sponsoring of a research effort with the Indiana University Transportation Research Center entitled, Transportation Flows in the State of Indiana: Commodity Database Development and Traffic Assignment. This research effort has resulted in a statewide commodity travel demand model identifying flows of manufactured goods, major grains, and coal on highway, rail, and waterway networks. The previous identification of major statewide commodity flow patterns has given the Indiana IMS a significant head start in delineating transportation corridors. Identification of Intermodal Facilities Intermodal facilities serve the movement of both freight and passengers and range from a simple bus terminal to a international airport or major waterway port. The primary purpose of these facilities is to perform intermodal transfers so that the most appropriate mode can be used for each portion of the trip. In terms of freight transportation, the four basic intermodal connections are: 1. Rail-Truck 2. Ship-Truck/Rail 3. Pipeline/Ship-Truck-Rail 4. Truck-Air connections at airports

99 Identification of Performance Measures Performance measures will be developed to allow the identification of performance impacts of different investment alternatives and the valuational of the associated trade-offs. The following classes of indicators and measures will be used to evaluate projects and monitor system performance: 1. Mobility 2. Financial costs 3. Environmental impacts 4. Economic Impacts 5. Safety 6. Quality of life Data Collection And System Monitoring This task will involve the use of geographic information system (GIS) technology to provide for the visual display of spatial and non-spatial data in the intermodal system s database. This capability will allow modal analysis, corridor analysis, or terminal by terminal analysis by displaying a variety of data in map form and providing flexible access to information on transfer points and corridors. The GIS will pull together the various elements of the IMS and will be easily accessible from a personal computer using the Windows interface. Data elements will include: Attribute Data Items-for example: 1. Ton miles of various commodities 2. Person miles of travel 3. Number of containers Performance Data Items-for example: 1. Volume/capacity ratios 2. Delay times 3. Mobility index System and Facility Access Efficiency Evaluation This activity will evaluate the IMS system performance data relative to established standards. Benchmarks will be established to gauge the performance of key facilities, infrastructure elements, and modal operations. Forecasts will be made of future travel demand to assess system performance. Where present service levels are adequate, estimates will be made of the point in time where rising demand will result in a performance threshold being reached.

100 Strategy and Action Identification This activity will focus on consensus building in the identification and evaluation of a strategy and action plan for the IMS. The information developed from the earlier tasks will be used in the identification of strategies to best correct deficiencies and optimize overall system performance. Potential strategies will include: 1. Connection of network linkages to provide access to intermodal terminals. For example, missing links on the arterial highway system or rail system and may be incorporated as part of the National Highway System or National Transportation System. 2. Safety maximization by improving modal coordination at points of grade-crossing and interchange. 3. Removal of all physical impediments to the movement of freight and passengers. This includes raising clearances for overpasses and rail bridges with low clearance, improving turning radius of freight lanes, and rebuilding heavy vehicle access to highways and bridges with inadequate weight limits. This could include the replacement of bridge structures to allow double-stack rail operations. 4. Improvement of the transfer of freight and passengers at terminal facilities and interchange points. 5. Enhancement of economic efficiency of freight and passenger movements by facilitating a diversion of traffic to modes with lower costs, better travel time, and better service.