Easy-To-Use Perpetual Pavement Design Software

Similar documents
No deep structural distress

Perpetual Pavement Design An Introduction to the PerRoad Program

Long Life Pavement Fundamentals

Overview. What is a Perpetual Pavement? Design Concept. PerRoad Pavement Design Software. Design Against Deep Structural Problems

Design Considerations for Perpetual Pavements. Gary L. Fitts, P.E. Sr. Field Engineer Asphalt Institute

NCAT Report 15-05R REFINED LIMITING STRAIN CRITERIA AND APPROXIMATE RANGES OF MAXIMUM THICKNESSES FOR DESIGNING LONG-LIFE ASPHALT PAVEMENTS

NCAT Report REFINED LIMITING STRAIN CRITERIA AND APPROXIMATE RANGES OF MAXIMUM THICKNESSES FOR DESIGNING LONG- LIFE ASPHALT PAVEMENTS

59 th Annual Meeting. Pavement Design Reminders. Prevent Thermal Cracking. Iowa HIPRO Thin Lifts. WisDOT Binder regions

Maximizing Pavement Life Mark D. Blow, P.E. Asphalt Institute

Perpetual Pavements. North Dakota Asphalt Conference Bismarck, ND April 6, 2010

GET IT RIGHT THE FIRST TIME:

NJ I-295: A Perpetual Pavement Design and Construction Project

BUILDING A BETTER PERPETUAL PAVEMENT

Reclamation Research at VDOT

National Center for Asphalt Technology Test Track Update. Dr. David Timm, P.E. Wisconsin Asphalt Pavement Association Wednesday, November 29, 2017

research report Design of a High-Binder- High-Modulus Asphalt Mixture Virginia Transportation Research Council Final Report VTRC 07-R15

Sensitivity Study of Design Input Parameters for Two Flexible Pavement Systems Using the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide

A Practical Look at Pennsylvania s Bradford Bypass A Perpetual Pavement State Route 0219, Sections C09 & D09

Impact of Subgrade Strength on HMA Section Thickness

Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide

NCHRP 9-49A Project Update: Performance of WMA Technologies: Stage II Long-term Field Performance. Binder ETG Meeting Oklahoma City, OK Sept 15, 2015

PERPETUAL PAVEMENTS. Rebecca S. McDaniel, PE, PhD Technical Director North Central Superpave Center Purdue University

Perpetual Pavements. A Success Story. Le cas du Don Valley Parkway à Toronto. JOURNÉE DU BITUME mars 2004 Hôtel Delta à Trois-Rivières

A Simplified Pavement Design Tool TxAPA Annual Meeting Danny Gierhart, P.E. Senior Regional Engineer Asphalt Institute.

TxME for Flexible Pavement Design

Layer Coefficient Calibration of Fiber Reinforced Asphalt Concrete Based On Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide

An Overview of the New AASHTO MEPDG Pavement Design Guide

NCAT Report FIELD AND LABORATORY STUDY OF HIGH-POLYMER MIXTURES AT THE NCAT TEST TRACK: FINAL REPORT

Guideline for the Implementation of the Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) for the Concessionary NovaDutra

FIELD-BASED STRAIN THRESHOLDS FOR FLEXIBLE PERPETUAL PAVEMENT DESIGN. James Richard Willis

57 th Annual PAPA Conference Hershey, Pennsylvania. Dr. Randy West, P.E. Director / Research Professor

Lecture 1. Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG): Overview MEPDG 1

Materials Selection in Pavement Design. Flexible Pavements

NCAT Report MATERIAL SELECTION GUIDANCE FOR ASPHALT PAVEMENT DESIGN. Dr. Carolina Rodezno Dr. David H. Timm Dr. Mary Robbins Dr.

CDOT s Pavement M-E Design by Jay Goldbaum Pavement Design Program Manager

A Simplified Pavement Design Tool

Overview and Implementation Issues

Fundamental to economic growth and quality of life Pavement design is critical for long lasting and economical pavements. Chris Wagner, P.E.

Introduction to Asphalt Pavement Design and Specifications

THINLAY ASPHALT FOR PAVEMENT PRESERVATION

Stone Matrix Asphalt and Perpetual Pavements

FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT DESIGN WITH RAP MIXTURE

A Contractor s Look at the Changing World of Asphalt Technology

2016 Local Roads Workshop Perpetual Pavement MICHIGAN RIDES ON US

2016 Louisiana Transportation Conference Danny Gierhart, P.E. Regional Engineer Asphalt Institute

Perpetual Pavements. Perpetual Pavements Local Roads Workshop MICHIGAN RIDES ON US

Perpetual Pavements. Design and Construction Concepts

research report Analysis of the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide Performance Predictions: Influence of Asphalt Material Input Properties

Material Test Framework for Warm Mix Asphalt Trials

Pavement Design Overview. Rebecca S. McDaniel March 10, 2011

Using Pavement Management Data to Determine Asphalt Pavement Performance Cycles

THICKNESS HICKN ESS ESI ES G I N A ph a t l Pa P v a em e ents for r Hi way a s y s & & St S ree

Applications, Design & Construction of Ultra-thin. thin Whitetopping. Dr. Julie M. Vandenbossche, P.E. - University of Pittsburgh-

VDOT MECHANSTIC EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN (MEPDG) IMPLEMENTATION

PERFORMANCE AND DESIGN OF THIN, HIGHLY MODIFIED PAVEMENTS

HPTO High Performance Thin Overlay Rocky Mountain Asphalt Conf. Denver, CO Feb. 20, 2009 Frank Fee NuStar Asphalt Refining

Thomas Bennert, Rutgers University Robert Sauber, NJDOT (Retired) CAIT RUTGERS. NEAUPG October 6-7th, 2010 Saratoga Springs, NY

EVALUATION OF MIXTURE PERFORMANCE AND S THIOPAVE

Historical Performance of Polymer Modified Asphalt Pavements: Part I. Laurand Lewandowski, Ph.D. Goodyear Chemical June 23, 2004

Using Perpetual Pavement Concepts. John Hickey Asphalt Pavement Association of Oregon

Using Perpetual Pavement Concepts. John Hickey Asphalt Pavement Association of Oregon

Verification of Gyration Levels in the Superpave

National Performance of High Recycled Mixtures

MEPDG Implementation: Arkansas

Innovative, Comprehensive Design and Construction Of Perpetual Pavement on the Red Hill Valley Parkway In Hamilton

Rideability Prediction of HMA Overlay Treatment of Flexible and Composite Pavements

NCAT Report PAVEMENT ME DESIGN IMPACT OF LOCAL CALIBRATION, FOUNDATION SUPPORT, AND DESIGN AND RELIABILITY THRESHOLDS

Current Status and Future of Asphalt Recycling in the USA. Randy C. West, Ph.D., P.E. Director & Research Professor

Performance of a Perpetual Pavement on Highway 406 in Ontario

Distresses within Asphalt Concrete Pavements and use of repave tool for Pavement Distress Management Paige Jordan 03/ 01/ 2016 Bradley University

Experience with RAP and RAS at the MnROAD Research Facility. Tim Clyne NCAUPG Technical Conference January 23, 2013

Quantifying the Benefits of Polymer Modified Asphalt

Reducing Mix Designs: Using a Single N design. Brian D. Prowell, PhD, PE

Advanced Characterization Testing of the Port Authority of NY/NJ s Hot Mix Asphalt Materials

Modified Asphalts in Pavement Design

Asphalt Pavements The Best Value for Michigan Taxpayers

Life-Cycle Cost Analysis

Material Properties of the 2003 NCAT Test Track Structural Study

Use of High Contents of Reclaimed Asphalt (RAP) in Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Pavements

Development and Implementation of the Superpave System in the USA And its Relationship to Pavement Design

7.1 Flexible Pavement Design. 7.2 Rigid Pavement Design TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ENGINEERING 1, 61360

NCHRP UPDATE 2008 SEAUPG CONFERENCE-BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA. Our Visit. Special Thanks. 9-22: Performance Related Specification for HMA

Canadian Case Study for Perpetual Pavements Design

GlasGrid Asphalt Pavement Reinforcement. October 21, 2016

HIGHLY MODIFIED BINDERS FOR THIN LIFT AND MICRO SURFACING EMULSION APPLICATIONS

PAVEMENT DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

IDOT HMA Update. Illinois Asphalt Paving Association Annual Meeting March 17, 2008

Impact of Overweight Traffic on Pavement Life Using Weigh-In-Motion Data and Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Analysis

Performance Characteristics of Liquid and Lime-Treated Asphalt Mixtures

CANADIAN USER PRODUCER GROUP FOR ASPHALT 2010 RECYCLED ASPHALT PAVEMENT

RAP in SMA. Ramon Bonaquist, Ph.D., P.E. Advanced Asphalt Technologies, LLC. Greg Moore Maryland State Highway Administration

2012 NCAT Pavement Test Track

2010 Midwestern Pavement Preservation Partnership Conference

Top-Down Fatigue Cracking Initiation & Propagation

OFFICE OF MATERIALS & SURFACING DOT. Connecting South Dakota and the Nation. Asphalt Conference. April 6, Rick Rowen. SDDOT Bituminous Engineer

Limitations of Foamed Warm Mix Asphalt Produced by Water Injection

Sustainable and economical pavements with a novel class of SBS polymers. International Road Federation World Meeting Lisboa, May

Sustainable Materials and Design for Alaskan Pavements

Feasibility of perpetual pavements in developing countries

Plantmix Asphalt Industry of Kentucky Winter Meeting February 10, 2011

Transcription:

Easy-To-Use Perpetual Pavement Design Software Rocky Mountain Asphalt Conference February 25, 2010 Dr. David Timm, P.E. Department of Civil Engineering Auburn University

What is a Perpetual Pavement? A pavement designed so there are no distresses deep in the pavement structure

Limit Cracking to top-down

Goal of Perpetual Pavement Design Design so there are no deep structural distresses Bottom up fatigue cracking Structural rutting All distresses can be quickly remedied from surface Result in a structure with Perpetual or Long Life

Designing Perpetual Pavements Newcomb, 2001

M-E Perpetual Pavement Design P Log A Threshold Strain t D 1 E 1 D 2 E 2 Log N No Damage Accumulation v D 3 E 3

Strain, (10E-06) 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Normal Range for Fatigue Testing Endurance Limit 1000 100000 10000000 1.1E+08 Number of Loads to Failure Normal Fatigue Testing Results Versus Endurance Limit Testing

What is the Endurance Limit for HMA? 1972 Monismith estimates about 70 2001 I-710 designed at 70 2002 70 used by APA 2007 NCHRP 9-38 Lab Study 100 for unmod binders 250 for mod binders More severe than field 2007 MEPDG uses 100 to 250 2008 Field measurements show higher strains

N8 and N9 0.0 Lift 1 N8 Section SMA N9 2.3 PG 76-28 2.0 Lift 1 Depth From Pavement Surface, in. 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 Lift 2 Lift 3 Lift 4 2.9 PG 76-28 3.5 2.8 1.9 6.4 Moisture Content = 10.8% Unit Weight = 133.4 pcf Moisture Content = 18.0% Unit Weight = 126.2 pcf Dense Graded HMA Dense Graded HMA PG 64-22 Rich Bottom Layer PG 64-22 Aggregate Base (Track Fill) Subgrade (A-7-6 Soil) 3.1 2.6 3.2 8.4 Moisture Content = 12.9% Unit Weight = 133.8 pcf Moisture Content = 17.2% Unit Weight = 126.9 pcf Lift 2 Lift 3 Lift 4 Lift 5

Strain Measurements

1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Strain and Temperature 01-Nov-06 31-Dec-06 01-Mar-07 30-Apr-07 29-Jun-07 28-Aug-07 27-Oct-07 26-Dec-07 24-Feb-08 24-Apr-08 Date 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Longitudinal Microstrain-Single Axle Mid-Depth Pavement Temperature,F N8-Temperature N9-Temperature N8-Strain N9-Strain

Strain vs. Temperature 1200 Longitudinal Microstrain-Single Axle 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Section Axle Type C 1 C 2 R 2 Single 21.249 0.033 0.96 N8 Tandem 15.326 0.035 0.96 Steer 11.341 0.036 0.87 Single 11.136 0.029 0.93 N9 Tandem 8.600 0.030 0.92 Steer 5.901 0.030 0.93 N8 Strain = 21.249e 0.033*Temp R 2 = 0.9584 N9 Strain = 11.136e 0.0293*Temp R 2 = 0.9309 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Mid-Depth Pavement Temperature, F

1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Strain History Section N8 11/1/2006 12/1/2006 12/31/2006 1/30/2007 3/1/2007 3/31/2007 4/30/2007 5/30/2007 6/29/2007 7/29/2007 8/28/2007 9/27/2007 10/27/2007 Time 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Longitudinal Microstrain-Single Axles Temperature, F Temperature Strain

Strain Distributions 100% 90% 80% 70% N9 N8 Percentile 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 Longitudinal Strain

NCAT Test Track Results 100% Percentile 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Fatigue Cracking 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 N1 2003 N2 2003 N3 2003 N4 2003 N5 2003 N6 2003 N7 2003 N1 2006 N2 2006 N3 2006 N4 2006 N8 2006 N9 2006 N10 2006 S11 2006 S13 2000 Microstrain

PerRoad 3.3 Sponsored by APA Developed at Auburn University / NCAT M-E Perpetual Pavement Design and Analysis Tool

Environmental Conditions Variability and Thresholds Layer Properties

f Material Properties f Thickness

Performance Criteria Location in Layer Pavement Response Threshold Transfer Function

Axle Weight Distribution Traffic Volume Types of Axles

Functional Classification Vehicle Frequency Number of Axles

Damage Accumulation Design Life Percent Below Threshold

PerRoadXPress For Low Volume Roads

Methodology - Overview Develop a set of boundary conditions Execute PerRoad analysis to determine required thickness for each design Develop design regression equations Guiding Principles Limit number of required inputs Make design procedure simple/efficient

Traffic Parameters Rural (Local) Collector vs. Urban Collector Volume 500, 1000 and 5000 AADT 0%, 1% and 3% Growth 1%, 5%, 10% and 20% Trucks Distribution Factors Assume 2-lane facility 100% Trucks in design lane 50% directional distribution Loadings Default Load Spectra in PerRoad Volume Range (over 30 years) 27,375 to 8,577,500 trucks

Structural Cross Section Layer Stiffness Poisson s Ratio HMA 400,000 to 1,000,000 psi 0.35 Variable Aggregate Base 20,000 psi 0.40 0-10 in. 10,000 psi to 30,000 psi Subgrade Soil 0.45 Infinite

Number of Simulations # Simulations = X X X X X X 2 Highway Classifications 3 Traffic Volumes 3 Growth Rates 4 Percent Trucks 3 Soil Stiffnesses 3 HMA Stiffnesses 3 Base Thicknesses 1,944 Pavement Designs

Design Equation HMA = C 0 + C 1 *AADT + C 2 *%Trucks + C 3 *%Growth + C 4 *Soil Stiffness + C 5 *Base Thickness + C 6 *HMA Stiffness

PerRoad XPress Traffic Soil Agg. Base HMA

AASHTO vs. PerRoad 30 25 AASHTO-93 PerRoad HMA Thickness, in. 20 15 10 5 HMA (a 1 = 0.44) 6 Agg. Base (a 2 = 0.14) Subgrade (M r = 15,000 psi) 0 1 10 100 1000 Traffic, million ESALs