R&D Administration Manager. Research and Development. Research and Development

Similar documents
R&D Administration Manager. Research and Development. Research and Development. NHS Staff Trust-Wide THIS IS A CONTROLLED DOCUMENT

Document Title: Site Recruitment and Initiation for Papworth Sponsored Studies

Document Title: Handling of drug alerts and recalls of IMPs

Once notified of the end of trial, a Research Manager, on behalf of the Sponsor, will contact the CI to arrange a close down monitoring visit.

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY RESEARCH OFFICE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE. Loughborough University (LU) Research Office

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR RESEARCH. 17. Study Close Down

End of Study Notification, Close-Out and Reporting Sponsored Research. Noclor/Spon/S11/01. SOP Reference ID:

RESEARCH AUDIT Standard Operating Procedure

Louise Brook Clinical Trials Quality Monitor. Date

Research Study Close-down and Archiving Procedures

Standard Operating Procedure Research Governance

Sponsorship of Clinical Research Studies

Conducting Clinical Trials of Investigational Medicinal Products

STUDY CLOSURE AND ARCHIVING

RD SOP32 Gaining MHRA Approval

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the Development, Management & Control of Research-Related SOPs

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Document Title: Annual Progress Reports (APRs) Document Number: 056

RDSOP16 Writing a GCP Compliant Protocol for Non-CTIMPs. Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR RESEARCH. 14. Amendments to Research Studies

Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) Management Standard Operating Procedure

Trial Committees SOP Number: 47 Version Number: 2.0 Effective Date: 01/02/2017 Review Date: 01/02/2019

Code break is also known as breaking the blind and involves un-blinding a participant so that the treatment allocation is made known.

ESSENTIAL DOCUMENTS DURING THE CLINICAL CONDUCT OF THE TRIAL

Index of Standard Operating Procedures for all research Sponsored by the UHL

R&D Manager Hillingdon Hospital. Revision History Effective Date Reason For Change. recommendations Version no:

The EFGCP Report on The Procedure for the Ethical Review of Protocols for Clinical Research Projects in Europe (Update: April 2011) Ireland

Development Safety Update Report Guidance

Ethical Approval. Document Number: 012

Joint Research Office of Doncaster & Bassetlaw

IMP Management and Accountability

Pharmacovigilance and safety reporting for sponsored ATIMPs/CTIMPs

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Study Files and Filing

RD SOP27 Implementing a Drug Recall for IMP/NIMP

Trial oversight SOP for HEY-sponsored CTIMPs

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 320. Developing a Research Protocol

Index of Standard Operating Procedures for all research Sponsored by the UHL

Standard Operating Procedure. SOP effective: 23 July 2015 Review date: 23 July 2017

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Standard Operating Procedure for Archiving

GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE TRAINING POLICY FOR PERSONNEL UNDERTAKING RESEARCH. UHB015 Version No: 2 Previous Trust / LHB Ref No:

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE. STH Researcher. Investigator Site File

The EFGCP Report on The Procedure for the Ethical Review of Protocols for Clinical Research Projects in Europe (Update: April 2011) Bulgaria

Standard Operating Procedure. Vendor Management

Recording, Managing and Reporting Adverse Events in the UK

Sally Burtles, Director of Research Services & Business Development

HUMAN RESOURCES POLICY

Standard Operating Procedure. SOP effective: 21 December 2017 Review date: 21 December 2019

Standard Operating Procedure. GCP Auditing of Research Studies

Document Number: SOP/RAD/SEHSCT/003 Page 1 of 9 Version 2.0

Guideline on Good Pharmacovigilance Practices Module V- Pharmacovigilance System Master File

The European Medicines Agency Inspections ANNEX IV TO PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCTING GCP INSPECTIONS REQUESTED BY THE EMEA:

Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) Research and Development Office

OFFICE FOR RESEACH PROCEDURE. Site Initiation and Close-out

Trial Master File. SOP No. SOP 7

RESEARCH IN HUMAN SUBJECTS OTHER THAN CLINICAL TRIALS OF INVESTIGATIONAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

Lead Employer Flexible Working Policy. Trust Policy

Research Study Amendments

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 725 CAPACITY, CAPABILITY AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF TRIALS HOSTED BY NNUH

Standard Operating Procedure. GCP Auditing of Research Studies. SOP effective: 23rd January 2018 Review date: 23rd January 2020

COMMON MARKET OF MEDICINES OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION: RULES OF GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE AND GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE

BISHOP WORDSWORTH S SCHOOL REDUNDANCY PROCEDURE

Marie-Claire Rickard (RG and GCP Manager) Rachel Fay (RG and GCP Manager) Elizabeth Clough (R&D Governance Operations Manager)

BRAIN UK UK Brain Archive Information Network

Writing a Protocol for CTIMPs

Fixed Term Staffing Policy

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Inspections: an academic perspective

Standard Operating Procedure

Trust Policy Unpaid Leave Policy & Procedure for Medical & Dental Staff

HUMAN RESOURCES POLICY

Job Summary. Job Title: Clinical Trial Coordinator. Grade: 6. Job reference: MBP Department: Cardiovascular Sciences

COMBINED RISK ASSESSMENT

FIXED TERM CONTRACT POLICY. Recruitment and Selection Policy Secondment Policy. Employment Policy. Officer / CSP

APPLICANT'S CHECKLIST

Computer System Validation & Backup

SPONSOR INVESTIGATIONAL MEDICINAL PRODUCT (IMP) MANAGEMENT

APPLICATION FORM. Application for a Recognised Research Ethics Committee (REC) Opinion on a Clinical Trial on a Medicinal Product for Human Use.

Recruiting Ex-Offenders Policy

Research & Development. J Illingworth and S Moffat. Research, pharmacy and R&D staff

ISRCTN: EudraCT Number: Sponsor Protocol Number: UCL 08/0350. Pharmacy Manual

GCP Basics - refresher

Author: reviewed by Emily Fraser, Senior HR Advisor. Owner: Alyson Sargeant, Head of Recruitment and Resourcing

Lead Employer Annual Leave Policy. VERSION V11 January 2018

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 410. Set up and Initiation of an Investigator Site

3.1. Overall Principal Investigator (PI), who holds the IND and is the Sponsor.

HOSPITAL AUTHORITY (HA) GUIDE

SAI Global Full Service Team

HUMAN RESOURCES POLICY

Date: 21 st May 2014 Version: 5 Page 1 of 11. Principal Author Name D. Skelhorn Signature: D. Skelhorn Date: 22 nd May 2014

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

DATA QUALITY POLICY. Version: 1.2. Management and Caldicott Committee. Date approved: 02 February Governance Lead

Trial Master File / Investigator Site File Index Clinical Trials of Investigational Medicinal Products

Recruiting Ex-Offenders Policy

STUDY DOCUMENTS. DOCUMENT NO.: CR007 v4.0. Marise Buçukoğlu ISSUE DATE: 07 MAR 2017 EFFECTIVE DATE: 21 MAR INTRODUCTION

Auditing of Swedish Enterprises and Organisations

Details: Approval: Distribution & Storage:

Standard Operating Procedure. SOP effective: 19 February 2016 Review date: 19 February 2018

Transcription:

Document Title: Document Number: Trial Closure and End of Trial SOP021 Staff involved in development: Job titles only Document author/owner: Directorate: Department: For use by: RM&G Manager, R&D Administration Manager, Research Officers R&D Administration Manager Research and Development Research and Development NHS Staff Trust-Wide Review due: June 2016 THIS IS A CONTROLLED DOCUMENT Whilst this document may be printed, the electronic version maintained on the Trust s Intranet is the controlled copy. Any printed copies of this document are not controlled. Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. Not to be reproduced without written permission. Key Points of this Document This document sets out the procedures to be followed by all Papworth Staff who are involved in the close-down, termination, suspension or final reporting of research studies and clinical trials. It aims to provide clear guidance on how patients, staff and trial related documentation is managed during close-out so as to ensure compliance with the Trust s Information Governance Policies, the Data Protection Act (2000), and the Research Governance Framework (2005). Page 1 of 7

1 Purpose and Content 1.1 This document defines the Trust s procedures that occur when a research trial is concluded or terminated at an individual site or study wide. This includes the roles and responsibilities of research staff, the actions to be taken and who to inform. 1.2 The document clarifies the responsibilities and actions of the Investigator and Sponsor in the event of premature termination or suspension of a trial as described in Good Clinical Practice (GCP: a standard for the design, conduct, performance, monitoring, auditing, recording, analyses, and reporting of clinical trials that provides assurance that data are reported results are credible and accurate, and that the rights, integrity, and confidentiality of trial subjects are protected ). 1.3 The definition of the end of trial is outside the scope of this SOP and is described in SOP019: Research Protocol Design for Papworth Sponsored Studies. 1.4 The archiving of study data is outside the scope of this SOP and is described in SOP011: Archiving SOP. 2 Roles & Responsibilities 2.1 This Policy applies to all personnel who are conducting research at the Trust including: staff who are full or part-time employees of the Trust, those working at the Trust with employment contracts funded partially or wholly by third parties including those within CUHP AHSC and those seconded to and providing consultancy to the Trust, and to students undertaking training at the Trust. 2.2 Staff involved in running or managing clinical trials must comply with the requirements set out in section 4. 2.3 It is the responsibility of the Principal Investigator based at Papworth, or the Trial Manager, to inform the Sponsor and Papworth s R&D Department (if different) of trial closure or suspension at Papworth Hospital. 2.4 The Chief Investigator, or their designee, is responsible for informing the applicable regulatory authorities of the end of trial and submitting the necessary end of trial reports. 3 Policy 3.1 This SOP is mandatory and, as per the Trust s Information Governance and Records Management framework, non-compliance with may result in disciplinary procedures. Page 2 of 7

4 Procedure 4.1 Planned trial closure of Papworth sponsored studies The definition of the end of the trial should be provided and justified in the protocol. In most cases, it will be the date of the last visit of the last participant or the completion of any follow-up monitoring and data collection as described in the protocol. For a non- Clinical Trial of an Investigational Product (CTIMP) study: The Chief Investigator, or their designee, is responsible for informing Papworth R&D Unit (representing the Sponsor) that the trial is closed, by using the appropriate Declaration of End of Clinical Trial Form from http://www.nres.nhs.uk/applications/after-ethical-review/endofstudy/ This should be submitted within 90 days of the end of the study. The Chief Investigator, or their designee, should inform the Ethics Committee which approved the research that the study has closed by using the Declaration of End of Study form within 90 days of the end of the study. The Chief Investigator, or their designee, should submit the End of Study report (there is no defined format for this report) to the REC within 12 months of the end of the study. For a CTIMP study The Chief Investigator, or their designee, should also: Submit the EudraCT form (available from www.nres.nhs.uk ) within 90 days of trial closure to inform the REC and Sponsor (Papworth R&D Unit) that the study has closed. Notify the MHRA (Competent Authority) within 90 days of trial closure (for trials conducted within the EU the Competent Authority within each Member State should be informed). Complete the Declaration of End of Trial form available from the EudraCT web site: http://ec.europa.eu (European database for clinical trials of a medicinal product). The following information is required: - Number of participants recruited, withdrawn, completed and lost to follow up. - Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Events (SUSARS), including a critical appraisal of these reactions - Anticipated date of final data analysis and of final study report availability Page 3 of 7

4.1.1. Closure of Papworth sponsored multi-centre studies: The Chief Investigator, or their designee, should inform the principal investigators at other sites, in writing, that the trial has closed. The letter should: thank the investigator for their participation summarise patient status (recruitment, withdrawals, SUSARS, SEAs etc) remind the investigator of any continuing trial obligations (e.g. archiving) advise of the dates of site closure, audit or inspections visits solicit any queries in procedure arrange for the return of trial supplies and/or drug supplies, if applicable outline the results of the trial or provide a copy of the report inform the investigators, if possible, of the timing of publication Site closure A study visit may be necessary to verify or complete the closure process at a participating site and will be conducted by either the Chief Investigator, or their designee. A site can be deemed to be closed once the following are reconciled or complete: Investigator/institution and sponsor files are reviewed and all essential documentation for a particular site are present in the relevant files to ensure a clear audit trail of study conduct at the site All site data are collected, entered, validated and all data queries resolved where feasible. This includes queries resulting from reconciliation of the clinical and safety database For studies using electronic data capture, the sponsor or their delegate has provided copies of final study data relating only to participants at that site for local study files All issues from previous study monitoring procedures are resolved or documented All financial matters are resolved and all site payments are complete as agreed and documented in study contracts/agreements/approvals. Finance to be notified that all financial matters are resolved and that the study site has closed. All unused trial supplies are returned or destroyed according to study and/or sponsor requirements For a CTIMP final drug accountability is complete and destruction of unused study drug is documented in the site file (if destroyed locally at site) Investigators are aware of the study publication policy, as documented in the study protocol and/or study contracts/agreements Investigator(s) are aware of and have implemented relevant ongoing requirements such as site archiving, subsequent audit/inspection procedures and any ongoing reporting requirements Details of site closure visits must be documented, normally in the form of a written report, and any issues raised must be followed up promptly. It should be clear who reviews closure reports to ensure that feedback is provided to the site and sponsor (where applicable). Page 4 of 7

A site closure visit may not be necessary for a non-commercial study. In such cases, confirmation/agreement letters can be signed to document that all activities related to study close out are complete, copies of essential documents are held appropriately and a site visit was not required. This must be documented in the Trial Master File. There is no regulatory requirement for the sponsor or delegate to notify routine closure of active sites at the conclusion of a study (ref: NRES SOPs http://www.nres.nhs.uk/nres-publications/publications/standard-operatingprocedures/) Upon closure of the trial, all study documentation is retained in the trial office until such time as all data queries are resolved and the database is closed. Final analysis of the data (following lock of the study database) and report writing may occur after formal declaration of the end of the project. At this time all trial documentation should be archived according to the study protocol. 4.2. Planned closure of non-papworth sponsored studies Upon closure of the trial, all study documentation is retained in the trial office until such time as all data queries are resolved and the trial sponsor s database is closed. At this time all trial documentation is archived according to the study protocol. 4.3 Early termination or temporary suspension of a trial The main REC (and MHRA if the study is a CTIMP) should be notified within 15 days of closure by using the Declaration of End of Trial form ( www.nres.nhs.uk ) The Annual Safety Report should accompany this form. The following information is required: justification of the premature ending of the trial number of participants still receiving treatment proposed management of participants still receiving treatment The Sponsor and R&D Unit should be notified immediately by letter or fax. All investigators must be informed of the trial termination/suspension using expedited means of communication and receipt of notification acknowledged. The reasons for early termination (or temporary suspension) must be made clear. Participants should be contacted to tell them of the termination or suspension of the study and to inform them of the actions they need to take. A follow up appointment should be made for patients so that their condition can be reviewed and any concerns addressed. Documentation and all records should be archived according to SOP011: Archiving SOP. Page 5 of 7

4.3.1. Early closure of participating site of a Papworth-sponsored multi-centred study It may be necessary for a site to prematurely close; for example a site withdraws from a trial because it can no longer recruit participants as the protocol stipulates because of changes to its treatment pathway. If this occurs then the procedures for closing the site should be followed as in 4.1.1. Once the Chief Investigator, or their designee formally closes the site the Sponsor or a delegate must notify the main REC, MHRA and other relevant bodies. 4.4 End of Trial Papworth Sponsored Studies It is the responsibility of the Chief Investigator to ensure the results of the study are analysed and reported within a reasonable timeframe. A summary of the final report on the research should be sent to the MHRA,as required, main REC and R&D Unit within 12 months of the end of the project. The Investigator should make all necessary efforts to get the results reported in a peer reviewed journal. 5 Risk Management / Liability / Monitoring & Audit 5.1 The R&D Department will ensure that this SOP, and any future changes to this document, are adequately disseminated. 5.2 The Unit will monitor adherence to this SOP via the routine audit and monitoring of individual clinical trials and the Trust s auditors will monitor this SOP as part of their audit of Research Governance. From time to time, the SOP may also be inspected by external regulator agencies (e.g. Care Quality Commission, Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency). 5.3 In exceptional circumstances it might be necessary to deviate from this SOP for which the written approval of the Senior R&D Manager should be gained before any action is taken. SOP deviations should be recorded including details of alternative procedures followed and filed in the Investigator and Sponsor Master File. 5.4 The Research and Development Directorate is responsible for the ratification of this procedure. Page 6 of 7

Further Document Information Approved by: Management/Clinical Directorate Group Approval date: (this version) Ratified by Board of Directors/ Committee of the Board of Directors Date: This document supports: Standards and legislation Research and Development Directorate 10 th October 2013 (Chairman s action) STET N/A Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004 and all associated amendments. Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care (2005) Key related documents: Trust Research Policy Research and Development Standard Operating Procedures entitled: SOP011: Archiving SOP SOP019: Research Protocol Design for Papworth Sponsored Studies Equality Impact Assessment: Does this document impact on any of the following groups? If YES, state positive or negative, complete Equality Impact Assessment Form available in Disability Equality Scheme document DN192 and attach. Groups: Disability Race Gender Age Sexual orientation Religious & belief Yes/No: NO NO NO NO NO NO NO Positive/ Negative: Review date: June 2016 Other Version Control Version Date Effective Valid To Approved by Date of Approval 1.0 5 th Aug 09 July 2011 RDD 5 th Aug 2009 2.0 8 th Nov 2013 June 2016 RDD (Chairman s action) 10 th Oct 2013 Page 7 of 7