Overview of Speciated Mercury at Anthropogenic Emission Sources

Similar documents
Mercury transformation and speciation in flue gases from anthropogenic emission sources: A critical review

Mercury transformation and speciation in flue gases from anthropogenic emission sources: a critical review

Mercury emission from anthropogenic sources from Guizhou province, China, in 2006

Updated Emission Inventories for Speciated Atmospheric Mercury from Anthropogenic Sources in China

Evaluation of Mercury Control Strategies in the Presence of SO 3 Using the MerSim TM Model. Brydger Van Otten, Bradley Adams

Updated Emission Inventories for Speciated Atmospheric Mercury from Anthropogenic Sources in China

Supporting Information for

Mercury emission and speciation of coal-fired power plants in China

UNEP Global Mercury Partnership Cement Industry Partnership Geneva Meeting June 18, 2013

MerSim TM Mercury Model. Abstract. Introduction. Mercury Control Strategies

Hg emissions from a coal-fired power plant in North China and its environmental impacts

Removal of Elemental Mercury from Flue Gas by V 2 O 5 /TiO 2 Catalysts Dispersed on Mesoporous Silica

Current Work on Integrated Assessment Modeling in China and Future Collaborations

Supplement of The effects of energy paths and emission controls and standards on future trends in China s emissions of primary air pollutants

SCR for NO x Control in Coal-fired Power Plants

Cross-effects and total gas clean-up system lay-out

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

ENVIRONMENTAL FRIENDLY RECYCLING OF EAF STEEL MILL DUST - GSD S STATE-OF-THE-ART WAELZ PROCESS

EAF DUST TREATMENT FOR HIGH METAL RECOVERY MICHIO NAKAYAMA *

Sorbents Evaluation Testing Facilities. 95% removal efficiency or an emission standard of lbs/gw h by 2012, while

Mercury Measurement and Control

Mercury Control in the Boiler

Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Cement and Lime Manufacturing Industries

Mercury Capture in Conventional APC Technologies

Mercury and SO3 Mitigation Issues for Scrubber Technology

Field Test Program to Evaluate Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Facilities with SCR-FGD Systems

Official Journal of the European Union L 181/65

Industrial Gas Analyzers in Applications Information

National Standards of the People's Republic of China

Granular material for use in the construction industry. Aggregates can be natural, industrially manufactured

NEW EAF DUST TREATMENT PROCESS : ESRF MICHIO NAKAYAMA *

Advanced AQCS for Oxy-fuel Combustion System; Controlling Mercury & SO3

Mercury emissions from industrial sources in China

Reducing Operating Costs and Risks of Hg Control with Novel Fuel Additives

De-NOx Concept to commissioning

Fate of Mercury in Cement Kilns

EMO August 1, Bobby I.T. Chen Client Program Manager

Technologies for emissions reduction in the metallurgical and chemical process industries

ZP Series of Small, High-sensitivity Infrared Gas Analyzers

Lesson 5. Industrial Applications of ESPs. Goal. Objectives. Introduction. Boilers. Particulate Matter Control System

Chemkin Simulation of Mercury Oxidation in a Condensing Heat Exchanger

Energy Production Systems Engineering

Overview of global mercury emissions. John Munthe IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute

Mercury Oxidation Across SCR Catalyst at LG&E s Trimble County Unit 1

REINHOLD ENVIRONMENTAL Ltd NOx-Combustion-CCR Round Table Presentation. February 1 & 2, 2016, in Orlando, FL / Hosted by OUC

Mercury Monitoring in a Cement Kiln

Multimedia Impacts of Halogen Injection for Mercury Control in Coal- Fired Boilers

Research & Development Needs for the Clean Coal Plant of the Future

GE Power. Smarter. Cleaner. Industry. Iron & Steel 2017 STEAM POWER SYSTEMS INDUSTRY PRODUCT CATALOG

Research Article Investigation on Mercury Reemission from Limestone-Gypsum Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Slurry

Developments of OJSC Scientific-Research Institute of Metallurgical Heat Engineering (VNIIMT)

D DAVID PUBLISHING. Mechanism Research of Hg 0 Oxidation by Pulse Corona Induced Plasma Chemical Process. 1. Introduction

Boiler & Heater Group

Lesson 5. Industrial Applications of ESPs. Goal. Objectives. Introduction. Boilers. Particulate Matter Control System

Development of EAF Dust Recycling and Melting Technology Using the Coal-based FASTMELT Process

Yi-Shiu Jen 1, Chung-Shin Yuan 1, Yuan-Chung Lin 1, Chang-Gai Lee 2. Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Sun Yat-sen University 2

Omya Water & Energy omya.com. Flue Gas Cleaning. Sustainable and efficient flue gas desulfurization (FGD)

4. Industrial Processes

Introduction. 1. MIDREX R process

CLEANER PRODUCTION GUIDELINES IN SMELTING INDUSTRIESS

The Chemical Industry and Climate Change. A Snapshot from India

Accelerating Mercury Control

Catalytic Activated Ceramic Dust Filter a new technology for combined removal of dust, NOx, dioxin, VOCs and acids from off gases.

Effect of the Chlorine Type, Concentration and the Adding Mode on the Mercury Transformation in. Coal-Fired Flue Gas

--> Buy True-PDF --> Auto-delivered in 0~10 minutes. GB Translated English of Chinese Standard: GB

Evaporative Gas Cooling and Emissions Control Solutions

Chapter Five Waste Processing, Treatment and Recycling Joe Green Dr Chris Wooldridge Cardiff University

ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR

By-Products from EAF Dust Recycling and Their Valorisation. Vlad POPOVICI

Fuel Quality and MATS for Coal- Fired Plants: The Ripple Effect

Control Options For FPI Boilers to Meet Proposed Boiler MACT Limits

Optimizing Absorber STEP 2 - FGDplus Working principle for DeSOx

Releasing behavior of mercury in coal during mild thermal treatment

Waste Acid Recycling Technology by Slag

Worldwide Pollution Control Association. August 3-4, 2010

Mercury removal from oxyfuel combustion flue gas over cobalt oxide loaded magnetospheres catalyst from fly ash

Reinhold Environmental Ltd.

(Part 2: Cement Industry Sector) Stanley Santos

Hydrometallurgical Cleaner Production Technology, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, , China

Capacity Building for the Improvement of the Air Quality

Biomass Combustion Technology

Table of Contents. 2.1 Coal properties Mercury transformations during combustion of coal... 8

Mercury emission control in coal-fired power plants. Dr. Dirk Porbatzki Uniper Technologies GmbH

Dry Sorbent Injection and Modeling for Acid Gas Emissions Control. Lew Benson McIlvaine Hot Topic Hour June 7, 2012

Effect of SCR Catalyst on Mercury Speciation

Industrial Sources of Mercury in Germany a Research Project

EPA Studies on the Control of Toxic Air Pollution Emissions from Electric Utility Boilers

MERCURY IN THE CEMENT INDUSTRY

BENEFICIAL USE OF COAL COMBUSTION PRODUCTS AN AMERICAN RECYCLING SUCCESS STORY

9/12/2018. Course Objectives MSE 353 PYROMETALLURGY. Prerequisite. Course Outcomes. Forms of Assessment. Course Outline

Behavior of SO 2 in the Process of Flue Gas Circulation Sintering (FGCS) for Iron Ores

Low-Carbon Cement in China

L-28 Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP) Air Pollution and Control (Elective-I)

Technology Gap Assessment

Current Status and Atmospheric Mercury Emissions Associated with Large-Scale Gold Smelting Industry in China

Predicting the impact of SO 3 on mercury removal by carbon sorbents

The Value Proposition of Circulating Fluidized Bed Scrubbing Technology. Robert Giglio Foster Wheeler Global Power Group

self evaluation 1.Stannite deposits constitute an important source for which of the following metal

PRODUCTS OF COMBUSTION

NRDC COMMENTS ON DRAFT BAT/BEP GUIDANCE DOCUMENT

Transcription:

3 rd International Conference on Earth Science & Climate Change, San Francisco, July 28-30, 2014 Overview of Speciated Mercury at Anthropogenic Emission Sources Shuxiao Wang Tsinghua University

Contents Introduction of Hg emission and speciation Hg speciation and transformation in flue gas Coal combustion Cement production Non-ferrous metal smelting Iron and steel production Speciated Hg emissions for China Conclusions

Introduction of mercury emission and speciation

Global anthropogenic Hg emissions to air UNEP. Global Mercury Assessment, 2013

Speciation profile of Hg emissions The data used is for outdated industrial process/air pollution control techniques not from field tests Streets et al., 2005

Hg speciation and transformation in coal combustion

Configuration of coal-fired power plants Economizer Exhausted Flue Gas PC Boiler Ammonia SCR Limestone Coal Air APH ESP/FF FGD Bottom Ash Fly Ash Gypsum Stack

Hg speciation in coal combustion flue gas Hg 2+ proportion in flue gas (%) 55 50 45 40 35 Chlorine concentration Correlation Coefficient = 0.96 1 2 4 8 16 32 Chlorine concentration in flue gas (mg/m 3 ) 10 Chlorine in flue gas (µg/m 3 )100 1 Percentage of oxidized mercury 45 40 35 27(29) 30 24(21) 41(43) 25 Hg concentration 29(25) 28(35) 20 15 16(11) 15(16) 10 9(11) Calculated(Measured) 2 4 8 16 32 Mercury in flue gas (ng/m 3 ) Percentage of oxidized mercury (%) 50 Surface area 40 R² = 0.95 30 20 10 Bhardwaj et al. (2009) This study 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Specific surface area (m 2 /g) Zhang et al., in preparation Proportion Hg 2+ proportion of oxidized in flue mercury gas (%) (%) 30.0 1200 30.0 temperature S02 25.0 1000 25.0 S01 20.0 800 20.0 15.0 600 15.0 10.0 400 10.0 5.0 200 5.0 Galbreath K C & Zygarlicke C J, 2000, 65 66: 289 310 0.0 0.0 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 Time (s) C) Flue gas temperature (

Hg oxidation across SCR SCR catalysts significantly oxidize Hg 0 PC Boiler Economizer Ammonia SCR Limestone Exhausted Flue Gas 2HCl + Hg 0 + 1/2 O 2 HgCl 2 + H 2 O 2NH 3 + 3 HgCl 2 N 2 + 3 Hg 0 + 6 HCl Coal Air 2NO + 2 NH 3 + 1/2 O 2 2 N 2 + 3 H 2 O APH FF FGD Bottom Ash Fly Ash Gypsum Stack Senior, 2005

Hg transformation across ESP/FF PC Boiler Over 99% of Hg p can be removed by ESP/FF Economizer Ammonia FF has no influence on Hg 0 SCR Limestone Exhausted Flue Gas Complicated Hg 0 Hg 2+ transformation in ESP About 60% of Hg 2+ can be removed by FF Coal Air APH ESP/FF FGD Bottom Ash Fly Ash Gypsum Stack

Hg transformation across WFGD About 80% of Hg 2+ can be removed by WFGD Economizer Exhausted Flue Gas PC Boiler Ammonia SCR Limestone Coal Air HgCl (g) APH HgCl (aq) 2 2 ESP/FF FGD HgCl (aq) + SO (aq) + H O Hg(g) + SO (aq) + 2Cl (aq) + 2H (aq) 2 2 + 2 3 2 4 Bottom Ash Fly Ash Gypsum Hg(g) + 2Cl(ads) HgCl (g) 2 Stack

Summary of Hg speciation after APCDs Hg 0 Hg 2+ Hg p No. of tests None 56 (8-94) 34 (5-82) 10 (1-28) 13 ESP 58 (16-95) 41 (5-84) 1.3 (0.1-10) 31 ESP+WFGD 84 (74-96) 16 (4-25) 0.6 (0.1-1.9) 7 FF 31 (10-58) 58 (34-76) 11 (1-25) 3 WS 65 (39-87) 33 (10-60) 2.0 (0.2-4.5) 6 SCR+ESP+WFGD 73.8 (16-96) 26 (4-84) 0.2 (0.1-0.4) 6 FF+WFGD 78 21 0.9 1 (CFB+)ESP 72 27.4 0.6 1 Chen et al., 2007; Zhou et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2008; Yang et al., 2007; Duan et al., 2005; Kellie et al., 2004; Shah et al., 2010; Guo et al., 2004; Tang, 2004; Goodarzi, 2004; Lee et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2012

Hg speciation and transformation in non-ferrous metal smelters

Configuration of non-ferrous metal smelter

Hg transformation across ROA process Oxidize Hg 0 to Hg 2+ by O and Cl Remove over 98% of Hg p Remove a large amount of Hg 2+ Oxidize Hg 0 to Hg + by HgCl 2 to form insoluble Hg 2 Cl 2 Remove most of Hg 0 and Hg 2+ Oxidize Hg 0 to Hg 2+ via catalyst Remove a large amount of Hg 2+ Wang et al., 2010

Hg speciation before and after acid plants Conversion and absorption process has significant impact DCDA is more effective than SCSA Hg 2+ dominates in flue gas after acid plants DCDA DCDA DCDA DCDA SCSA DCDA DCDA double conversion double absorption SCSA single conversion single absorption Zhang et al., 2012

Hg speciation in flue gas of various kilns Hg 0 is the main chemical form in exhaust gases from cooling cylinder and volatilization kiln, accounting for up to 97.8% of total Hg 3300 3250 ROA process ZnO recovery process Hg concentration in the flue gas (µg m -3 ) 3200 3150 3100 3050 3000 500 400 300 200 100 Hg 0 Hg 2+ 0 Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 6 Flue gas sampling site Site 1: Exhaust cooling cylinder gas Site 4: Exhaust dehydration gas Site 2: Roasting flue gas before DCA Site 5: Volatilization kiln flue gas before FGD Site 3: Exhaust roasting gas Site 6: Exhaust volatilization kiln gas Wu et al., submitted

Summary of Hg speciation after APCDs Hg 0 Hg 2+ Hg p DC+FGS+ESD+DCDA 46 49 5 DC+FGS+ESD+MRT+DCDA 6 90 4 DC+FGS+ESD+SCSA 57 38 5 DC+FGS 41 54 5 DC 33 62 5 FGS 65 33 2 None 56 34 10 Wang et al., 2010; Li et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2012; Wu et al., 2012

Hg speciation and transformation in cement plants

Hg flow during cement production Precalciner process is the predominant cement production process worldwide The recycling of collected dust from FFs/ESPs and the preheat of raw materials/coal cause mercury cycling in cement production Wang et al., 2014

Hg transformation within cement plants 330 o C Kiln Feed Temperature from 350 to 850,,Hg vaporization/ decomposition Stack Temperature from 200 to 50,Hg adsorption on raw materials and dust 90 o C 1000 o C Fuels From Kiln & Precalciner Raw Mill BH Catch Sikkema et al., 2011 Coal Mill Long residence time (>25s)and high PM concentration (>10g/m3), Hg oxidation and adsorption when flue gas cooling

Hg species at the outlet of kiln system The mercury species measured at the outlet of the kiln system is predominantly oxidized mercury and particle-bound mercury The kinetically-limited mercury oxidation in the flue gas is promoted compared with power plants 250 mercury concentration(ug/m 3 ) 200 150 100 50 Hg0 Hg2+ Hgp 0 Raw mill on Raw mill off Plant 1 Plant 2 Mlakar et al., 2010 Wang et al., 2014

Hg transformation in raw mill and FF The removal efficiencies of raw mill+ff are more than 90% 250 200 Before raw mill mercury concentrat tion(ug/m 3 ) 150 100 50 Before raw mill Before raw mill Stack Before raw mill Hg0 Hg2+ Hgp 0 Stack Stack Stack Raw mil on Raw mil off Plant 1 Plant 2 Mlakar et al., 2010 Wang et al., 2014

Summary of Hg speciation profiles The mercury emission profile used in previous inventories: 80% Hg 0, 15% Hg 2+ and 5% Hg p Recent tests indicate that the mercury emitted from cement plant is mainly in oxidized form, accounting for 61.3-90.8% Proportions of emitted mercury species (%) Hg 0 Hg 2+ Hg p Streets et al., 2005 Cement production 80 15 5 Mlakar et al., 2010 Raw mill off 16 75.7 8.3 Raw mill on 43.1 45.5 11.4 Plant 1 9.2 90.8 0 Wang et al., 2014 Plant 2 38.7 61.3 0 Plant 3 23.4 75.1 1.6

Summary of Hg speciation profiles Schreiber & Kellett, 2009

Hg speciation and transformation in iron and steel production

Iron and steel production process stack stack coking waste dust collector dust collector coking rotary kiln rotary kiln stack coke dust collector limestone dolomite sintering machine iron ore dust collector dust collector desulfurization stack Fukuda et al., 2011 sinter coke coal stack stack dust collector power plant blast furnace stack dust collector gas dust limestone pig iron iron cake steel scrap stack stack convertor electric furnace dust collector dust collector molten steel steel slag gas dust molten steel steel slag Solid samples Flue gas samples Wang et al., in preparation Fugitive emissions

Hg transformation in iron & steel plants Mercury is vaporized into the flue gas as Hg 0 (>1000 C) The predominant species before ESPs is Hg 2+, possibly caused by the Fe2O3-containing particles in the flue gas The Hg removal of ESPs and FGD are correlated with the proportion of Hg p and Hg 2+ in the flue gas before the facility ESP Desulfurization devices Wang et al., in preparation

Summary of Hg speciation profiles The mercury species emitted into atmosphere depend on mercury speciation of each stack, and mercury emissions from each stack Proportions of emitted mercury species (%) Hg 0 Hg 2+ Hg p Streets et al., 2005 Iron and steel production 80 15 5 rotary kiln for limestone 20.8 79.2 0.0 rotary kiln for dolomite 8.1 91.9 0.0 Wang et al., 2014 Sintering machine 32.1 67.9 0.0 Plant 1 electric furnace 92.1 7.9 0.0 Power plant 15.0 85.0 0.0 Sintering machine-high-sulfur 0.0 100.0 0.0 Sintering machine-low-sulfur 0.8 99.2 0.0 Sintering machine tail 14.3 85.7 0.0 Wang et al., 2014 Blast furnace-pig iron 38.0 62.0 0.0 Plant 2 Blast furnace-iron scrap 50.0 48.6 0.0 Convertor-crude steel 53.3 46.7 0.0 Power plant 77.7 22.3 0.0

Summary of Hg speciation profiles electric furnace 4% Power plant 17% Sintering machine 50% rotary kilnlimestone 16% rotary kilndolomite 13% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% Hgp Hg2+ Hg0 0% Streets et al. Plant 1 Plant 2 Sintering machinehigh-sulfur 3.5% Sintering machine-lowsulfur 41.0% Power plant 48.8% Sintering machine tail 1.8% Fugitive- Blast furnace 4.4% Convertorcrude steel 0.5% Sintering and power plants are predominant emission sources Hg 2+ accounts for 59-73% of total Hg in flue gas emitted to air Speciation profile used in previous study is: 80% Hg 0, 15% Hg 2+ and 5% Hg p

Speciated Hg emissions for China

Updated speciation profile of Hg emissions Sub-category Updated Streets et al. (2005) Hg 0 Hg 2+ Hg p Hg 0 Hg 2+ Hg p Coal-fired power plants 0.79 0.21 0.00 0.20 0.78 0.02 Industrial coal combustion 0.66 0.32 0.02 0.20 0.78 0.02 Residential coal combustion 0.59 0.33 0.07 0.09 0.03 0.88 Other coal combustion 0.66 0.32 0.02 0.09 0.03 0.88 Stationary oil combustion 0.50 0.40 0.10 0.50 0.40 0.10 Mobile oil combustion 0.50 0.40 0.10 0.50 0.40 0.10 Biomass fuel combustion 0.74 0.05 0.21 0.96 0.00 0.04 Waste incineration 0.96 0.00 0.04 0.96 0.00 0.04 Cremation 0.96 0.00 0.04 0.96 0.00 0.04 Zinc smelting 0.30 0.65 0.05 0.80 0.15 0.05 Lead smelting 0.57 0.38 0.05 0.80 0.15 0.05 Copper smelting 0.47 0.48 0.05 0.80 0.15 0.05 Gold production 0.80 0.15 0.05 0.80 0.15 0.05 Mercury production 0.80 0.15 0.05 0.80 0.15 0.05 Cement production 0.34 0.65 0.01 0.80 0.15 0.05 Iron and steel production 0.34 0.66 0.00 0.80 0.15 0.05 Aluminum production 0.80 0.15 0.05 0.80 0.15 0.05

Speciated Hg emissions for China 140 120 100 Hgp Hg2+ Hg0 80 60 40 20 0 1999 2010 1999 2010 1999 2010 1999 2010 1999 2010 1999 2010 1999 2010 Coal-fired power plants Industrial coal combustion Zinc smelting Lead smelting Copper smelting Cement production Iron and steel production HgT Hg0 Hg2+ Hgp 1999 emission (Streets et al., 2005) 535.8 299.2 171.9 64.7 2010 emissions (Wang et al., 2013) 531.1 302.5 214.4 14.1

Conclusions

Conclusions Homogeneous process at high temperature (400-750 C) and heterogeneous process at low temperature (200-400 C) have equivalent influence on Hg speciation Composition of fuels or raw materials affects composition of flue gas (e.g. halogen) and properties of fly ash (e.g. SSA), resulting in different Hg speciation Conventional air pollution control devices have co-benefit removal efficiencies on different Hg species and contribute to Hg transformation Recent field tests have provided new knowledge and more reliable Hg speciation profile for emission inventories The speciated Hg emissions have changed significantly and will have substantial impacts on atmospheric Hg transports

Thanks for your attention! Contact information: Tel: 86-10-62771466 Email: shxwang@tsinghua.edu.cn