11 Appendices Appendix A. Location of Onsite Sewage Treatment Systems in Marion County Source: Marion County Utilities (Darker green areas indicate the locations of septic tanks) Normandeau Associates, Inc. 2011 66
Normandeau Associates, Inc. 2011 67
Appendix B. Nitrate Loading Estimates for Rainbow Springs Source: SWFWMD Draft Data The five figures below are based on calculations done by staff at SWFWMD and are provided as a courtesy to the Restoration Plan. Normandeau Associates, Inc. 2011 68
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 discharge (cfs) Nitrite load (tons/yr) nitrate + nitrite (mg/l) 2,000 1,900 1,800 1,700 1,600 1,500 1,400 1,300 1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 nitrate load (tons/yr) mean annual discharge (cfs) nitrate (mg/l) 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0-0.5-1.0-1.5-2.0-2.5-3.0 DRAFT Estimated groundwater-nitrate loading to the Rainbow River, based on the average annual median of nitrate concentrations measured at 4 spring vents, and reported average annual discharge from USGS gaging station 02313100, Rainbow River at Dunnellon, FL. (data sources: SWFWMD, FDEP, USGS).
Year mean annual Annual Av. nitrate conc. discharge nitrate load nitrate load Annual estimated discharge (cfs) nitrate (mg/l) lbs/gal gal/day lbs/day lbs/year nitrate load (tons/yr) 1994 640 0.96 7.97E-06 413,614,080 3,296 1,203,014 602 1995 656 1.13 9.42E-06 423,954,432 3,994 1,457,808 729 1996 701 1.29 1.08E-05 452,842,790 4,870 1,777,624 889 1997 671 1.01 8.42E-06 433,842,394 3,653 1,333,386 667 1998 860 1.06 8.84E-06 555,729,293 4,911 1,792,552 896 1999 712 1.11 9.25E-06 459,951,782 4,256 1,553,595 777 2000 549 1.21 1.01E-05 354,609,446 3,577 1,305,685 653 2001 521 1.19 9.92E-06 336,836,966 3,342 1,219,746 610 2002 560 1.18 9.84E-06 362,041,574 3,562 1,299,999 650 2003 653 1.11 9.25E-06 422,015,616 3,905 1,425,457 713 2004 620 1.30 1.08E-05 400,817,894 4,335 1,582,435 791 2005 718 1.38 1.15E-05 464,152,550 5,340 1,949,138 975 2006 641 1.50 1.25E-05 414,260,352 5,181 1,890,894 945 2007 570 1.57 1.31E-05 368,375,040 4,822 1,759,918 880 2008 601 1.60 1.33E-05 388,409,472 5,181 1,891,091 946 2009 595 1.64 1.37E-05 384,531,840 5,258 1,919,017 960 2010 602 1.73 1.44E-05 389,055,744 5,611 2,048,145 1,024 * Based on average of annual median nitrate concentrations from Rainbow Spring No. 1, Spring No. 4, Bubbling Spring, and Spring No, 6 DRAFT
Rainbow Springs, annual median nitrate + nitrite (in mg/l) and annual average of the median values of four springs median median median median Average Year Rainbow-1 Rainbow-4 Bubbling Rainbow-6 of medians 1994 0.80 1.18 1.04 0.83 0.96 1995 1.09 1.37 1.18 0.86 1.13 1996 1.19 1.38 1.36 1.23 1.29 1997 0.78 1.28 1.13 0.84 1.01 1998 0.95 1.23 1.15 0.90 1.06 1999 1.07 1.36 1.16 0.85 1.11 2000 1.17 1.47 1.28 0.94 1.21 2001 1.20 1.49 1.15 0.91 1.19 2002 1.24 1.33 1.18 0.97 1.18 2003 1.13 1.28 1.09 0.94 1.11 2004 1.39 1.46 1.26 1.09 1.30 2005 1.52 1.56 1.37 1.09 1.38 2006 1.61 1.69 1.50 1.20 1.50 2007 1.85 1.75 1.47 1.20 1.57 2008 1.90 1.76 1.43 1.30 1.60 2009 1.97 1.83 1.54 1.23 1.64 2010 2.11 1.93 1.52 1.35 1.73 *2011 2.26 1.99 1.62 1.30 1.79 DRAFT * only one value reported, 01/20/2011 FDEP data included from 2005-2007
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 *2011 nitrate + nitrite (mg/l) dissolved Rainbow Springs, annual median groundwater-nitrate concentrations, by spring vent (includes FDEP data from 2005 to 2007) 2.40 2.20 2.00 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 Rainbow-1 Rainbow-4 Bubbling Rainbow-6 0.20 0.00 Year DRAFT * 01/20/2011 quarter only values for 2010 and 2011 reported as Total NO 3 +NO 2
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 *2011 nitrate (mg/l) Rainbow Springs, annual average of median of quarterly nitrate values from Rainbow Spring No. 1, Spring No. 4, Bubbling Spring and Spring No. 6 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 y = 0.0441x + 0.9011 R² = 0.8252 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Year DRAFT * only one set of quarterly values reported, 01/20/2011
Appendix C. Goal and Action Worksheets for Restoration of Rainbow Springs and River Working Group members were divided into teams and provided worksheets upon which to record goals and actions as they were created. These sheets are presented below and include who would be responsible for each action, when it should be done by, resources needed to accomplish the action and how the successful completion of the action would be evaluated. These sheets represent a work in progress with some groups advancing further than others. They represent recommendations and can act as a starting point for discussion to implement the restoration plan. The goals and actions are presented in alphabetical order as follows: Biodiversity Education and Outreach Land Use and Development Recreation Water Quality Water Quantity Normandeau Associates, Inc. 2011 73
Biodiversity: Actions Goal: Restore the diversity and quantity of native flora and fauna in the Rainbow River system. Action Who When Resources Needed Evaluation Conduct flora inventory Conduct faunal inventory Compare results of 1994 vegetation/recreation study conducted by UF with 2011 study currently underway Implement use of zoning in the river to protect biodiversity Identify species in need of specific management actions DEP or SWFWMD contracted to NGO or university DEP, SWFWMD, FWC When funding available When funding available Funding Final Report Updated 1985 Rainbow River Management Plan plant survey Funding Final Report UF and DEP 2012 Staff time Completed Analysis DEP, FWC, Marion County, City of Dunnellon DEP, FWC Upon adoption of the restoration plan After flora and faunal inventories are completed Funding, Staff time, public buy-in, appropriate regulations Staff Time Study to determine if protected areas are sustained or recovered List of species, Identified actions. Normandeau Associates, Inc. 2011 74
Biodiversity: Actions Goal: Reduce and control invasive exotic flora and fauna in the Rainbow River system. Action Who When Resources Needed Evaluation Inventory location and extent of exotic and invasive species Develop invasive/exotic treatment plan for Rainbow River Develop invasive exotic education and enforcement program targeting river access locations Research potential solutions to remove or control Lyngbya DEP, SWFWMD, FWC Ongoing Continued funding, staff GIS maps DEP, FWC Ongoing Funding, staff Yearly work plans DEP, FWC Upon completion of the management plan Funding Developed program UF Ongoing Funding Field and laboratory studies. USDA approved control methods Normandeau Associates, Inc. 2011 75
Education and Outreach: Actions Goal: Educate stakeholder groups on ways to improve the water quality in the Rainbow Springs Basin. Actions Who When Resources needed Evaluation Inventory existing education programs to identify possible overlaps and new programs needed. SWFWMD, SJRWMD, MC, Municipalities By end of 2011 Staff time and facilitator Complete a report. Maintain existing educational efforts; Clean Farms, teacher trainings, Know Where it Flows. SWFWMD, MC Ongoing Funding and staff time Pre and Post tests and number of successful programs Create a specific curriculum (designed to meet Sunshine State Standards) for the Rainbow Springs Basin for schools. SWFWMD By end of 2014 Funding and either staff or a contractor. Getting the curriculum created. Assess usage and test knowledge gained by students. Create neighborhood programs promoting landscape BMPs, specifically for fertilizer use. Coordinate a forum for decisionmakers on the economic impacts of poor water quality vs. improved water quality SWFWMD, MC SWFWMD, SJRWMD, MC, Municipalities By end of 2012 Neighborhoods and volunteers plus funding and staff time By end of 2012 Funding and staff time Number of programs, pre and post-tests plus # of people who intend to change behaviors. Follow-up to see if behaviors do change. Complete the program. Observe future actions of participants. Normandeau Associates, Inc. 2011 76
Land Use and Development: Actions Goal: By 2020, ensure all jurisdictions within the Rainbow Springs basin shall offer density bonuses for cluster development as well as for purple pipe systems and gray water systems. Action Who When Resources needed Evaluation Marion County will add this to their comp plan if not already there. Then add to LDRs. MC Planning 2020 None Levy County will add this to their comp plan if not already there. Then add to LDRs LC Planning 2020 None Dunnellon will add this to their comp plan if not already there. Then add to LDRs Williston will add this to their comp plan if not already there. Then add to LDRs City of D Planning City of W Planning 2020 None 2020 None Normandeau Associates, Inc. 2011 77
Land Use and Development: Actions Goal: By 2020, all developments within ½ mile of the Rainbow River and Spring will be on municipal water and sewer systems Action Who When Resources needed Evaluation Assess current situation and identify all properties within the ½ mile buffer on septic and well vs. municipal water and sewer systems Develop plan to implement the needed hookups Seek funding necessary to implement the needed hookups Normandeau Associates, Inc. 2011 78
Land Use and Development: Actions Goal: Implement regulations by 2020 to ensure all high density developments within the spring basin are connected to a wastewater treatment system, preferably with advanced treatment. Action Who When Resources needed Evaluation Marion County will add this to their comp plan if not already there. Then add to LDRs MC Planning 2020 None for planning. $ needed for hookups and new WWTPs Levy County will add this to their comp plan if not already there. Then add to LDRs Dunnellon will add this to their comp plan if not already there. Then add to LDRs Williston will add this to their comp plan if not already there. Then add to LDRs LC Planning 2020 City of D Planning City of W Planning None for planning. $ needed for hookups and new WWTPs 2020 None for planning. $ needed for hookups and new WWTPs 2020 None for planning. $ needed for hookups and new WWTPs Normandeau Associates, Inc. 2011 79
Recreation: Actions Goal: Protect the aquatic resources of the Rainbow River system while promoting sustainable recreational uses. Action Who When Resources needed Evaluation Educate user groups about the fragile ecosystem they use All public access points Daily Videos, brochures, interpretive displays, etc. Repeat the UF study of 1994 and 2011 on a five year cycle Determine a carrying capacity for users of the river Develop a management plan for recreational use of the river Examine opportunities to use spatial and temporal zoning to reduce recreational impacts to the aquatic community of the river Develop strategies to reduce user conflicts on the river Examine commercial use of the river both levels of use and any impacts to the river DEP, Marion Co., WMD, FWCC, City of Dunnellon & Villages of Rainbow Springs POA DEP, Marion Co., WMD, FWCC, City of Dunnellon DEP, Marion Co., WMD, FWCC, City of Dunnellon DEP, Marion Co., WMD, FWCC, City of Dunnellon DEP, Marion Co., WMD, FWCC, City of Dunnellon September 2012 March 2013 March 2013 March 2013 March 2013 UF Study and SWFWMD Vegetation Survey of 2011 UF Study and SWFWMD Vegetation Survey of 2011 UF Study and SWFWMD Vegetation Survey of 2011 UF Study and SWFWMD Vegetation Survey of 2011 UF Study and SWFWMD Vegetation Survey of 2011 Repeat the UF study of 1994 and 2011 on a five year cycle Repeat the UF study of 1994 and 2011 on a five year cycle Repeat the UF study of 1994 and 2011 on a five year cycle Repeat the UF study of 1994 and 2011 on a five year cycle Repeat the UF study of 1994 and 2011 on a five year cycle Normandeau Associates, Inc. 2011 80
Goal: Protect the aquatic resources of the Rainbow River system while promoting sustainable recreational uses. Action Who When Resources needed Evaluation Determine if there is sufficient quantity and quality of public access to the river Examine the impacts specific to the wildlife associated with the river Survey visitor experiences on the river to determine level of user comfort and satisfaction DEP, Marion Co., WMD, FWCC, City of Dunnellon DEP, Marion Co., WMD, FWCC, City of Dunnellon DEP, Marion Co., WMD, FWCC, City of Dunnellon, UF March 2013 March 2013 March 2013 UF Study and SWFWMD Vegetation Survey of 2011 UF Study and SWFWMD Vegetation Survey of 2011 UF Study and SWFWMD Vegetation Survey of 2011 Repeat the UF study of 1994 and 2011 on a five year cycle Repeat the UF study of 1994 and 2011 on a five year cycle Repeat the UF study of 1994 and 2011 on a five year cycle Normandeau Associates, Inc. 2011 81
Water Quality: Actions Goal: By 2016, halt the increasing trend in nitrate concentrations in the Rainbow River Springs Group that is present in 2011. Action Who When Resources needed Evaluation Encourage farmers to develop and embrace nitrogen reduction strategies and Nutrient Management Plans Enroll at least 10 agricultural landowners per year operating within the spring basin into an appropriate BMP program) Establish nitrogen TMDL and initiate a Basin Management Action Plan for the basin Implement the Marion County Watershed Assessment Model (WAM) Identify areas of localized high groundwater recharge, closed depressions, sinkholes and swallets, that may provide rapid transport of nutrients and other pollutants to springs Reduce loading contributions from septic tanks with responsible maintenance, inspections, improved technology, and retrofits FDACS, FDEP IFAS and County Extension Service FDEP, EPA now now County and state now requires detailed analysis of current land use and land cover data coupled with water quality data Academic groups, karst researchers, County, FDEP, WMD, caving and cave diving community Homeowners, State and county, FDOH now now Expand reclaimed/reuse water availability State and county within next 5 yrs Karst feature inventory and mapping, dye trace studies New infrastructure, centralized sewers, new wastewater treatment facilities, and upgrades of existing facilities to AWT, transmission lines for reuse water Normandeau Associates, Inc. 2011 82
Goal: By 2016, halt the increasing trend in nitrate concentrations in the Rainbow River Springs Group that is present in 2011. Action Who When Resources needed Evaluation Quantify the economic impact of increased nutrients: How much will it cost to do nothing? Provide easily understandable information and presentations on Rainbow Springs and water quality to a wide audience: schools, public officials, the general public Academic institutions, who else? now ongoing Improve stormwater retention and treatment for nutrient reduction, applied to new systems and retrofit of existing structures Reduce stormwater volumes and nutrient loads in runoff water Continued water-quality monitoring and assessment of springs and groundwater in the basin County and State FDEP, WMD, county within next 5 yrs ongoing Normandeau Associates, Inc. 2011 83
Water Quantity: Actions Goal: Implement and/or enforce all existing regulations to protect spring flow quantities. Action Who When Resources needed Evaluation Set a Minimum Flow and Level (MFL) for Rainbow River by Dec. 2011 that will protect the important biological and recreational resources present in the river throughout all seasons of the year. SWFWMD December 2011 Carefully scrutinize all new and existing water permits applied for after the MFL is established to ensure they will allow the river to remain within the MFL Update the existing comprehensive regional water supply plan for the Northern Planning Region (WRWSA) of the SWFWMD (encompassing Rainbow River) after the MFL is established to ensure that the MFL becomes central to water supply planning SWFWMD SWFWMD and WAWSA ongoing 2012 Normandeau Associates, Inc. 2011 84
Water Quantity: Actions Goal: Develop and implement local government initiatives that achieve water conservation. Action Who When Resources needed Evaluation Encourage building codes that promote water conservation Identify how future water needs at the county level will impact Rainbow River Identify opportunities for and then promote the use of reclaimed water and/or reuse treated water Explore alternative water sources. Update existing and develop new educational programs for water conservation i.e., 40 Gallon Challenge (http://www.40gallonchallenge.org/about.cfm Marion and Levy Cos. Cities of Dunellon and Williston. Marion and Levy Cos. Cities of Dunellon and Williston. Marion and Levy Cos. Cities of Dunellon and Williston. Marion and Levy Cos. Cities of Dunellon and Williston. SWFWMD Marion and Levy Cos. Cities of ongoing ongoing Local Utilities Local Utilities Funding, volunteers Normandeau Associates, Inc. 2011 85
Goal: Develop and implement local government initiatives that achieve water conservation. Action Who When Resources needed Evaluation Dunellon and Retrofit existing water lines for reclaimed water use. Williston. Marion Co. ongoing Discourage the introduction of water bottling plants in the Rainbow Springs recharge basin. Develop and promote xeriscape and/or native landscaping and irrigation ordinances. Promote Marion County s Green Industry Best Management Practice Certification program Support efforts to better determine how much water is being withdrawn by domestic selfsupply Establish partnerships within Marion Co. builder/developer community. For example, put on a workshop series on water Marion and Levy Cos. Cities of Dunellon and Williston. Marion and Levy Cos. Extension. Cities of Dunellon and Williston. Marion and Levy Co. SWFWMD City of Dunellon City of Williston Marion County Extension, Normandeau Associates, Inc. 2011 86
Goal: Develop and implement local government initiatives that achieve water conservation. Action Who When Resources needed Evaluation conservation for the Marion County Building Association Develop irrigation audit/leak detection program for homeowners Promote Low-Impact Development Practices within spring basin Springs Working Group Marion County Extension Marion County Extension Normandeau Associates, Inc. 2011 87
Water Quantity: Actions Goal: Improve understanding of hydrogeology and flow of Rainbow springs. Action Who When Resources needed Evaluation Maintain the present level of monitoring of the spring flow and increase monitoring effort if future needs arise. USGS Continuous daily monitoring USGS gaging stations Determine climatic and seasonal variability of flows and adjust water needs accordingly. Encourage the re-establishment of previously impacted wetlands in the spring basin Protect areas of high recharge from modifications that will decrease the recharge capability SWFWMD Marion and Levy Counties Marion Soil and Water Marion and Levy Counties ongoing Implement a study to improve understanding of conduit flow in the springs basin and the relationship of conduits to karst features (sink holes and swallets) on the surface. SWFWMD, FGS, Marion and Levy Counties Normandeau Associates, Inc. 2011 88