SUMMARY OF COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

Similar documents
SUMMARY OF COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS. PROPONENT: Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation. PROPOSAL NAME: 43 Portable Asphalt Mixing Plant Sites

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

Content Copy Of Original

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

Content Copy Of Original

OF COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS. . Manufacturing

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

CCR Fugitive Dust Control Plan

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS. Town of Grand Rapids Water Treatment Plant Upgrade

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

Content Copy Of Original

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES PLAN FOR FUGITIVE DUST Greenwood Aggregates Company Limited Violet Hill Pit > Town of Mono, ON

Content Copy Of Original Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Ministère de l Environnement, de la Protection de la nature et des Parcs

Content Copy Of Original

Content Copy Of Original

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

Environmental Guideline on Stone crushing plant set up temporarily for the purpose of a project by a public department

Content Copy Of Original

Content Copy Of Original

Content Copy Of Original

Environmental Leadership Program Inspection Form Permanent Asphalt Facility

2014 Toxics Reduction Act Substance Accounting Reporting Values for Canada Building Materials Kingston Ready Mix Concrete Plant for PM 10

Content Copy Of Original

Environmental Guideline for Saskatchewan Asphalt Plants

Content Copy Of Original

Content Copy Of Original

Concrete Waste Management WM-8

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality - Air Quality Division ADDITIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION FOR BOILERS

NORTH AMERICAN Precast Concrete Sustainable Plant Program

Environmental Leadership Program Inspection Form Portable Asphalt Facility

RECOMMENDED GUIDELINE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES CANADIAN READY MIXED CONCRETE INDUSTRY FOR FOR

ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES FOR PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF FUGITIVE EMISSIONS FROM CEMENT PLANTS

Lands & Waters Aggregate & Petroleum Resources March 15, 2006

AMENDED ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE APPROVAL NUMBER 3824-AV3R9Q Issue Date: February 20, 2018

Content Copy Of Original

Concrete Waste Management

Environmental Guidelines for Construction Sites

10. STAGE FOUR: MONITORING OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MEASURES (MESM) DURING ROAD CONSTRUCTION

CHECKLIST FOR READY MIX CONCRETE SUPPLY OF CONCRETE (RMC)

AEP GENERATION RESOURCES

WORKING GROUP MEETING #6 PROPOSED AMENDED RULE 1407

Manitoba lot Conservation

July 22, Robert Cyr Cyr Construction 1998 Ltd. Box 24, Group 525, RR 5 Winnipeg MB R2C 2Z2. Dear Mr. Cyr:

Concrete Waste Management

one (1) hot mix asphalt silo, operating at a maximum temperature of 163 degrees celsius;

NELSON PLANT CCR FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL PLAN

Content Copy Of Original

AEP GENERATION RESOURCES

Attachment 1 WORLD BANK ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND SAFETY GUIDELINES 1 MINING AND MILLING UNDERGROUND (INTERIM)

MATRIX 1: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN TO BE IMPLEMENTED DURING THE SITE PREPARATION AND CONSTRUCTION PHASES

Plant Yates - Operations Procedures Fugitive Dust Control Plan AMENDMENT SUMMARY. Date Amendment # Comments I Notes. Page 2 of 5

Plant Bowen - Operations Procedures Fugitive Dust Control Plan AMENDMENT SUMMARY. Date Amendment # Comments I Notes. Page 2 of 5

Concrete Block Manufacture

Content Copy Of Original

Checklist for Ready Mix Concrete Supply of Concrete (RMC)

PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA (PSO)

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

CITY OF CHICO. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) Worksheet for Small Construction Projects. Project Address: Building Permit Number:

Content Copy Of Original

Appendix 1. Air Quality Management Plan

City of West Sacramento Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) Worksheet for Small Construction Projects

Schedule A DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Watercourse Protection Bylaw

SNAP CODE: NOSE CODE:

Client File No.: November 1, Dallas Mowat Target Products Ltd Bradner Road Abbotsford B.C. V4X 1H3. Dear Mr.

IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANITOBA ENVIRONMENT ACT (C.C.S.M. c. E12S) THIS LICENCE IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 10(1) TO:

May 3, Jon Bagley Westman Aerial Spraying Ltd. Site 50, Box 56, RR 5 Brandon MB R7A 5Y5. Dear Mr. Bagley:

Assessment of Air Quality of Stone Crusher Units in India. M Selvarajan, Anand Bohra, KRP Nath, N K Tiwary and A K Mishra

Duvha Power Station. Fugitive Emission Management Plan. March 2015

Noront Ferrochrome Production Facility (FPF) Environmental Issues and Approach. October 2017

Re: Erosion Control Report and Drawings Requirements Accompanying Document

Client File No.: October 16, Don Hodgson, Location Manager Delmar Commodities Ltd. Box 1236 Beausejour, MB ROE OCO. Dear Mr.

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN CONTENTS CHECKLIST Stormwater Management Plan Contents. SWMP Page # or Reference Location Yes/No

Exhibit G. Construction Mitigation Plan

Particulate Matter Rules Update BAAQMD BACWA Meeting

Content Copy Of Original

Fugitive Dust Control Plan Sherburne County Generating Plant

Storm Water Run-off. Applicability. Background Storm water run-off from paved parking areas, Existing Federal and State Laws

Water Pollution Control for Work in Sensitive Areas

Job Name: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Tavistock Place, London

**A COPY OF THE LICENCE MUST BE KEPT ON SITE AT THE DEVELOPMENT AT ALL TIMES**

Annual CCR Fugitive Dust Control Report. Tucson Electric Power Company Springerville Generating Station Springerville, Arizona

Greater Vancouver Regional District Concrete and Concrete Products Industries Emission Regulation Bylaw No. 1084, 2008

Tile-block Version2.8 Certification Criteria

--> Buy True-PDF --> Auto-delivered in 0~10 minutes. GB Translated English of Chinese Standard: GB

This summary and the Report subsequently inform the recommended mitigation contained in Section 28 and will inform the Project conditions.

1 CC ;#( t Conservation and Water Stewardship

EXECTIVE SUMMARY TO DETERMINE EFFECTIVE RE-USE OF FLY ASH, BOTTOM ASH AND COAL DUST FROM CAÑON CITY POWER PLANT

Draft Air Quality & Odour Net Effects Analysis & Comparative Evaluation Report

Transcription:

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS PROPONENT: Boulet Brothers Concrete Ltd. PROPOSAL NAME: Ste. Agathe Concrete Batch Plant CLASS OF DEVELOPMENT: 1 TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: Concrete Batch Plant CLIENT FILE NO.: 5408.00 OVERVIEW: On April 28, 2009, Manitoba Conservation received a Proposal for the construction and operation of a concrete batch plant to be located at Lot 5/6-7-2-3-4-39087 in the Riel Industrial Park in the RM of Ritchot. The facility will produce ready mix concrete for off-site use and will operate Monday to Saturday between the hours of 7:00 am and 8:00 pm. The Department, on May 4, 2009, placed copies of the Proposal in the Public Registries located at 123 Main St. (Union Station), the Winnipeg Public Library, the Manitoba Eco-Network, and the Millennium Public Library. Copies of the Proposal were also provided to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) members. A notice of the Environment Act proposal was also placed in the Steinbach Carillon on May 7, 2009. The newspaper and TAC notifications invited responses until June 5, 2009 COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC: The following concerns were received from the public: Given the proximity to Ste. Agathe School this proposal should incorporate best available control technologies to minimize air pollutants, especially particulate matter from cement and fly ash dust as well as aggregate and sand dust. The baghouse should be subject to more rigorous inspection and maintenance than is indicated in the proposal. In addition I would like to see more information on the efficiency of the baghouse filter (Appco Generic) for particulate matter less than 10 microns. Also, data on prevailing winds is necessary. Some form of monitoring levels of PM10 at the school yard should be considered if prevailing winds bring particulate matter from the plant. Some best management practices for ensuring proper baghouse operations: Fabric bags should be fitted properly and inspected regularly Replace any damaged or torn fabric bags observed during inspections The silo pop valve should be checked regularly Keep a written record of all inspections and maintenance Some alternatives for minimizing dust emissions from batch plant operations: Consider covers or partial enclosures for elevated conveyors into plant

Using spray bars for dust suppression at aggregate transfer points (e.g., at the end of the conveyor belt which charges the aggregate bins). Enclose or shield aggregate storage areas and transfer points For new batch plant construction, consider batch plant location in an area with minimum exposure to prevailing winds Some alternatives for minimizing dust emissions from aggregates storage: Consider higher moisture content in aggregates delivered to yard Partial enclosures or below grade pads for aggregate stockpile areas Minimize exposed surface area of aggregate stockpiles Minimize number of transfer points for raw materials Minimize drop heights for conveyor or hoppers Consider fencing property boundaries using 2-metre high solid fence (i.e., concrete block, wood plank or chain link with PVC plastic) For new plant site construction, consider plant site location in an area with minimum exposure to prevailing winds. Some alternatives for minimizing dust emissions from plant site traffic: Consider paving or hard surfacing of high traffic areas around yard Keep paved or hard surfaced areas clean For new plant site construction, consider plant site location in an area with minimum exposure to prevailing winds. Given the plants proximity to Ste. Agathe park (a recreational and camping site) the proposal should include strategies to minimize noise Another strategy to combat noise complaints is to isolate the ready mixed concrete plant from its neighbours. When planning new concrete plants, or upgrading existing facilities, consider these techniques to isolate noise: Locate ready mixed concrete plants in compatibly zoned areas. Lower the overall plant site elevation relative to site elevations of neighbours property. (This strategy can be combined with the storm water retention system to prevent storm water from running off the property). Use sound barriers, high walls, earthen berms capped with vegetation and tree lines to attenuate the noise at the property line. Install the cement delivery blower in a sound proof enclosure. Situate the plant as far as is practical from the property line of neighbours who might be disturbed. Also is there an estimate on the increase in traffic on PR 305 next to the school?

The proposed location for the facility is within an industrial park, therefore it is proposed to be located in an appropriately zoned area. Clauses 8 25 of the draft Environment Act Licence address air emissions and clause 28 addresses wastewater. Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation reviewed the proposal and provided the comments produced below. COMMENTS FROM THE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency No concerns. Environment Canada The following is a summary of the comments provided: Portable or mobile concrete plants can emit significant amounts of fine and coarse particulates and gaseous emissions. Particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size (PM 2.5 ) has been declared toxic under CEPA because of human health and environmental concerns. (A good fact sheet outlining environmental and health effects of PM is available at http://www.ec.gc.ca/air/p-matter_e.html) Concrete is made by mixing Portland cement, water, and coarse (stone) and fine (sand) aggregates and may include the addition of admixtures (chemicals to control setting properties). Supplementary cementing materials (SCMs) may also be used to replace a portion of the cement. SCMs used include fly ash (by-product of coal-fired power generation), ground blast furnace slag (by-product of metals smelting) and micro silica (silica fume). This project description did include the use of fly ash as SCM. The concrete manufacturing process releases the following substances declared toxic under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA): PM 10, sulphur oxides, nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds, and ground level ozone. Particulate matter is the main substance of concern released from this sector, accounting for about 1.6% of the total PM from Canadian sources. PM is mainly released through fugitive emissions during materials handling and storage activities. For details please see http://www.ec.gc.ca/cleanair-airpur/concrete- WSB02E25FD-1_En.htm. Environment Canada has concerns regarding these types of operations, and refers the proponent to the Canada-Wide Standards for PM and Ozone that was developed by the CCME to address the industrial sector where emission reduction strategies for PM were developed. Batch plants such as the above project can emit significant amounts of PM and gases if not equipped with proper air

Disposition pollution control devices or if these control devices are not operated or maintained properly. More information on the CCME initiatives and the joint initial actions for the hot mix asphalt sector can be found at http://www.ccme.ca/intiatives/standards.html?category_id=61. EC acknowledges the proponent s use of a baghouse as an emission control measure. Although concrete batch plant is not specifically referred to in the following document, EC however, recommends that the proponent be required to implement the Best Available Techniques (BAT) as outlined in Section 4.2 of the Multi-pollutant Emission Reduction Analysis Foundation (MERAF) for the Hot- Mix Asphalt Sector (September 2002) This report is available at www.ccme.ca/assets/pdf/hot_mix_asphalt_final_meraf_e.pdf The proponent should also be aware that concrete batch plants are required to report under National Pollutant Release Inventory. Clauses 8 25 of the draft Environment Act Licence address air emissions Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation (MIT) Highway Planning and Design Branch The following comments were received: The proposed location of the concrete batch plant is located along PR 305. If PR 305 will be utilized as direct access, the proponent should be informed that any new, modified or relocated access connections onto PR 305 will require a permit from Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation (MIT), including changed use in access. A permit will also be required for any construction (above or below ground level) within 38.1 m (125 ft) or for any plantings within 15.2 m (50 ft) from the edge of right-of-way PR 305. These comments were forwarded to the proponent for their information. Manitoba Science, Technology, Energy and Mines Energy, Climate Change & Green Strategy Initiatives No concerns Manitoba Culture, Heritage and Tourism Historic Resources Branch The following comment was provided:

No concerns with regard to this project s potential to impact heritage resources. If at any time however, significant heritage resources are recorded in association with these lands during development, the Historic Resources Branch may require that an acceptable heritage resource management strategy be implemented by the developer to mitigate the effects of development on the heritage resources. Manitoba Conservation Sustainable Resource & Policy Management Branch Disposition No concerns Manitoba Conservation Parks and Natural Areas Branch Disposition No concerns Manitoba Conservation Pollution Prevention Branch The following comments were provided: The potential sources of air pollution are the cement silo, aggregate storage pile, the conveyor system, vehicle traffic areas and material handling. The cement silo will be provided with baghouse dust collectors. The operation of the plant will adhere to the Best Environmental Management Practices (BEMP) for Redi-Mix Concrete Plants document prepared by the Manitoba Heavy Construction Association and the Canadian Ready Mixed Concrete Association s Environmental Management Practices for Ready Mixed Concrete operations in Canada. Provided that the dust collectors were appropriately operated and maintained, and the BEMP guidelines are followed, it is expected that concerns regarding air pollution will be addressed. Although there is a potential to generate noise, it is expected not to impact any residence considering its location inside an industrial park.

Manitoba Water Stewardship The following comments were provided: Fisheries Branch has reviewed this request to construct a concrete batch plant in Ste. Agathe at the Riel Industrial Park. This site is relatively close to the Red River so there is a concern for the potential for contaminants to enter the River via the storm sewers or perhaps road side ditches. The proponents however have indicated that: chemicals are within a secondary containment basin with a concrete floor; there is a designated washout area with an adjacent wash water reclaim area; reclaimed wash water is recycled and reused; site grading is such that all water from concrete production as well as storm water that may come into contact with batching materials will drain to washout/reclaim areas and; all other uncontaminated storm or flood waters do not enter the ponds but are directed to storm sewers. Given these measures, and the fact that the site is within the Town s ring dyke, any fisheries concerns appear to be addressed. PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing is not recommended. RECOMMENDATION: The Proponent should be issued a Licence for the construction and operation of a concrete batch plant in accordance with the specifications, terms and conditions of the attached draft Licence. Enforcement of the Licence should be assigned to the Central Region of Manitoba Conservation. A draft environment act licence is attached for the Director s consideration. Prepared by: Ryan Coulter, M.Sc., P.Eng. Environmental Engineer Municipal, Industrial, and Hazardous Waste Section June 15, 2009

Telephone: (204) 945-7023 Fax: (204) 945-5229 E-mail Address: ryan.coulter@gov.mb.ca