Page 1 of 31 REGISTRATION REPORT Part A Risk Management Product name(s): Active Substance(s): Deltamethrin, 15 g/l COUNTRY: FRANCE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT FRANCE Application for a label extension according to Art. 51 - Minor uses Applicant: BAYER S.A.S.
Page 2 of 31 Table of Contents 1 DETAILS OF THE APPLICATION... 3 1.1 APPLICATION BACKGROUND... 3 1.2 ACTIVE SUBSTANCE APPROVAL... 3 1.3 REGULATORY APPROACH... 4 1.4 DATA PROTECTION CLAIMS... 4 1.5 LETTER(S) OF ACCESS... 5 2 DETAILS OF THE AUTHORISATION... 5 2.1 PRODUCT IDENTITY... 5 2.2 CLASSIFICATION AND LABELLING... 5 2.2.1 Classification and labelling under Directive 99/45/EC... 5 2.2.2 Classification and labelling in accordance with Regulation (EC) No1272/2008... 5 2.2.3 Other phrases in compliance with Regulation (EU) No 547/2011... 5 2.2.4 Other phrases linked to the preparation... 5 2.3 PRODUCT USES... 7 3 RISK MANAGEMENT... 9 3.1 REASONED STATEMENT OF THE OVERALL CONCLUSIONS TAKEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UNIFORM PRINCIPLES... 9 3.1.1 Physical and chemical properties... 9 3.1.2 Methods of analysis... 9 3.1.3 Mammalian Toxicology... 9 3.1.4 Residues and Consumer Exposure... 9 Summary of the evaluation... 10 3.1.5 Environmental fate and behaviour... 10 3.1.6 Ecotoxicology... 10 3.1.7 Efficacy... 10 3.2 CONCLUSIONS ARISING FROM FRENCH ASSESSMENT... 10 3.3 FURTHER INFORMATION TO PERMIT A DECISION TO BE MADE OR TO SUPPORT A REVIEW OF THE CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE AUTHORISATION... 11 APPENDIX 1 COPY OF THE FRENCH DECISION... 12 APPENDIX 2 COPY OF THE DRAFT PRODUCT LABEL AS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT... 12 APPENDIX 3 LETTER(S) OF ACCESS... 31
Page 3 of 31 PART A Risk Management The company Bayer S.A.S. has requested a label extension according to article 51 in for the product DECIS PROTECH. This document describes the specific conditions of use and labelling required for extension of the registration of containing deltamethrin in. The risk assessment conclusions are based on the already existing registration of the preparation in. Therefore, the evaluation of the current application is limited to the points not covered by the existing registration. Appendix 1 of this document provides a copy of the French Decision. Appendix 2 of this document is a copy of the draft product label as proposed by the applicant. Appendix 3 of this document is a copy of the letter(s) of access. 1 DETAILS OF THE APPLICATION 1.1 Application background is an oil in water emulsion formulation containing 15 g/l of deltamethrin, for use as an insecticide for the control of various pests. The aim of this registration application is to gain label extension of spinach crops. The complete GAP for the national application in is provided below, under point 2.3. 1.2 Active substance approval Deltamethrin Regulations Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 of 25 May 2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of approved active substances. (extension of the approval period Reg. EU No 823/2012) Specific provisions of regulation were as follows : Only uses as insecticide may be authorised. For the implementation of the uniform principles as referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the conclusions of the review report on deltamethrin, and in particular Appendices I and II thereof, as finalised in the Standing Committee on Plant Health on 18 October 2002 shall be taken into account. In this overall assessment Member States: must pay particular attention to the operator safety and must ensure that the conditions of authorisation include appropriate protective measures, should observe the acute dietary exposure situation of consumers in view of future revisions of maximum residue levels, must pay particular attention to the protection of aquatic organisms, bees and non-target arthropods and must ensure that the conditions of authorisation include risk mitigation measures, where appropriate. There is no definitive EFSA Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance. A Review Report is available (6504/VI/99-final, 17 October 2002).
Page 4 of 31 1.3 Regulatory approach The present application (n 2015-1155) was evaluated by the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (Anses) 1. The current document based on Anses assessment of the application submitted for this product is in compliance with Regulation (EC) no 1107/2009 2, implementing regulations and French regulations. Since the application is intended for use in only, the draft Part A was not circulated for comments. According to the French law and procedures, specific conditions of use are set out in the Decision letter. The French Order of 12 September 2006 3 provides that: - unless formally stated in the product authorisation, the pre harvest interval (PHI) is at least 3 days; - unless formally stated in the product authorisation, the minimum buffer zone alongside a water body is 5 meters; - unless formally stated in the product authorisation, the minimum re-entry period is 6 hours for field uses and 8 hours for indoor uses. Drift reduction measures such as low-drift nozzles are not considered within the decision making process in. However, drift buffer zones may be reduced under some circumstances as explained in appendix 3 of the abovementioned French order. The data taken into account are those deemed to be valid either at European Union level or at zonal/national level. This part A of the RR presents a summary of essential scientific points upon which recommendations are based and is not intended to show the assessment in detail. The conclusions relating to the acceptability of risk are based on the criteria indicated in Regulation (EU) No 546/2011 4, and are expressed as acceptable or not acceptable in accordance with those criteria. Finally, the French Order of 26 March 2014 5 provides that: - an authorisation granted for a reference crop applies also for linked crops, unless formally stated in the Decision - the reference and linked crops are defined in Appendix 1 of that French Order. Thus, at French national level, possible extrapolation of submitted data and the corresponding assessment from reference crops to linked ones are undertaken even if not clearly requested by the applicant in their drr, and a conclusion is reached on the acceptability of the intended uses on those linked crops. The aim of this Order, mainly based on the EU document on residue data extrapolation 6 is to supply minor crops with registered plant protection products. Therefore the GAP table (Section 2.3) and Decision may include uses on crops not originally requested by the applicant. The Decision, as reproduced in Appendix 1, takes also into account national provisions, including national mitigation measures. 1.4 Data Protection Claims The applicant is owner of the new submitted studies and claims data protection. 1 2 3 4 5 6 French Food Safety Agency, Afssa, before 1 July 2010 REGULATION (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichtexte.do?cidtexte=jorftext000000425570 COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 546/2011 of 10 June 2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards uniform principles for evaluation and authorisation of plant protection products http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/eli/arrete/2014/3/26/agrg1407093a/jo SANCO document guidance document:- Guidelines on comparability, extrapolation, group tolerances and data requirements for setting MRLs : SANCO/ 7525/VI/95 - rev.9
Page 5 of 31 1.5 Letter(s) of Access Not relevant for this application. 2 DETAILS OF THE AUTHORISATION 2.1 Product Identity Product name (code) Authorisation number 2010023 Function Applicant Composition Formulation type (code) Insecticide BAYER S.A.S. Bayer CropScience Département Homologation 16 rue Jean-Marie Leclair CS 90106 F-69266 Lyon Cedex 09 15 g/l deltamethrin Oil in water emulsion (EW) Packaging Not relevant for extension of authorization according article 51. 2.2 Classification and Labelling 2.2.1 Classification and labelling under Directive 99/45/EC Not relevant for extension of authorization according article 51. 2.2.2 Classification and labelling in accordance with Regulation (EC) No1272/2008 Not relevant for extension of authorization according article 51. 2.2.3 Other phrases in compliance with Regulation (EU) No 547/2011 Refer to the decision of product authorization. 2.2.4 Other phrases linked to the preparation Wear suitable personal protective equipment 7 : refer to the Decision in Appendix 1 for the details Re-entry period 8 : 6 hours - refer to the decision of product authorisation. Pre-harvest interval 9 : 3 days 7 8 9 If a tractor with cab is used, wearing gloves during application is only required when working with the spray mixture The legal basis for this is Titre I Article 3 of the French Order of 12 September 2006 concerning the marketing and use of products encompassed by article L. 253-1 of the rural code [that is, plant protection products/pesticides] According to the French Order of 12 September 2006, PHI cannot be lower than 3 days unless specifically stated in the assessment and decision.
Page 6 of 31 Other mitigation measures: refer to the Decision of the product authorisation The label may include the following recommendations: refer to the Decision of the product authorisation EUH208: Contains alpha-hexylcinnamaldehyde, benzylsalicylate, 1-2, benzisothizoio-3(2h)-one and mixture of 5- chloro-2methyl with 2-methyl-3(2H)-isothiazolone. May produce allergic reactions. The label must reflect the conditions of authorisation.
Page 7 of 31 2.3 Product uses Please note: The GAP Table below reports the intended uses proposed by the applicant, and possible extrapolation according to French Order of 26 march 2014 (highlighted in green), evaluated and concluded as safe uses by as RMS. Those uses are then granted in. When the conclusion is not acceptable, the intended use is highlighted in grey and the main reason(s) reported in the remarks. When an use is acceptable with GAP restrictions, the modifications of the GAP are in bold. Use should be crossed out when the applicant no longer supports this use. PPP (product name/code) active substance 1 deltamethrin Formulation type: Conc. of as 1: type 15 g/l Applicant: Zone(s): Bayer CropScience professional use non professional use Verified by MS: yes Crop and/ or situation (a) Zone Product code F G or I (b) Pests or Group of pests controlled (c) Formulation Application Application rate per treatment PHI (days) (l) Remarks: (m) Type (d-f) Conc. of as (i) method kind (f-h) growth stage & season (j) number min max (k) interval between applications (min) kg as/hl min max water L/ha min max kg as/ha min max Spinach, beet leaves, purslane, sea samphire Delta methri n EW15 F Plant aphids Myzus sp., Aphis sp. EW 15 g/l Spraying At any stage 2 14 days 200-800 Max. 7.5 per applicati on 3 0.5 L PPP/ha
Page 8 of 31 Crop and/ or situation (a) Zone Product code F G or I (b) Pests or Group of pests controlled (c) Formulation Application Application rate per treatment PHI (days) (l) Remarks: (m) Type (d-f) Conc. of as (i) method kind (f-h) growth stage & season (j) number min max (k) interval between applications (min) kg as/hl min max water L/ha min max kg as/ha min max Spinach, beet leaves, purslane, sea samphire Delta methri n EW15 F Leaf eating Noctuids Mamestra sp., Autograph a sp. EW 15 g/l Spraying At any stage 2 14 days 200-800 Max. 7.5 per applicati on 3 0.5 L PPP/ha Remarks: (a) For crops, the EU and Codex classifications (both) should be used; where relevant, the use situation should be described (e.g. fumigation of a structure) (b) Outdoor or field use (F), glasshouse application (G) or indoor application (I) (c) e.g. biting and suckling insects, soil born insects, foliar fungi, weeds (d) e.g. wettable powder (WP), emulsifiable concentrate (EC), granule (GR) (e) GCPF Codes - GIFAP Technical Monograph No 2, 1989 (f) All abbreviations used must be explained (g) Method, e.g. high volume spraying, low volume spraying, spreading, dusting, drench (h) Kind, e.g. overall, broadcast, aerial spraying, row, individual plant, between the plants - type of equipment used must be indicated (i) g/kg or g/l (j) Growth stage at last treatment (BBCH Monograph, Growth Stages of Plants, 1997, Blackwell, ISBN 3-8263-3152-4), including where relevant, information on season at time of application (k) The minimum and maximum number of application possible under practical conditions of use must be provided (l) PHI - minimum pre-harvest interval (m) Remarks may include: Extent of use/economic importance/restrictions
Page 9 of 31 3 RISK MANAGEMENT 3.1 Reasoned statement of the overall conclusions taken in accordance with the Uniform Principles 3.1.1 Physical and chemical properties Not relevant for extension of authorization according article 51. 3.1.2 Methods of analysis 3.1.2.1 Analytical method for the formulation Not relevant for extension of authorization according article 51. 3.1.2.2 Analytical methods for residues Further data for this application are not necessary. 3.1.3 Mammalian Toxicology The preparation is already registered in. If used properly and according to the intended conditions of use, adverse health effects for operators, workers, bystanders and residents will not be expected. Nature of protective clothing and PPE for the operator: For mixing/loading - Nitrile gloves certified EN 374-3; - Working coverall 65% polyester / 35% cotton; minimum 230 g/m²; with water repellent treatment; - Long-sleeved apron, Category III Type PB3 worn over the coverall proposed above; - Goggles or face shield certified according to EN 166 standard with frame marking 3. For application _ Downward spraying If application with tractor with cab - Working coverall 65% polyester / 35% cotton; minimum 230 g/m²; with water repellent treatment; - Disposable nitrile gloves certified EN 374-2 in the case of an intervention on application equipment, but not inside the cab. In the case of an intervention on application equipment, it should be noted that gloves should be worn only outside the tractor cab and stored after use outside the cab If application with tractor without cab - Working coverall 65% polyester / 35% cotton; minimum 230 g/m²; with water repellent treatment; - Disposable nitrile gloves certified EN 374-2 in the case of an intervention on application equipment; For equipment cleaning - Nitrile gloves certified EN 374-3; - Working coverall 65% polyester / 35% cotton; minimum 230 g/m²; with water repellent treatment; - Long-sleeved apron, Category III Type PB3 worn over the coverall proposed above; - Goggles or face shield certified EN 166 with frame marking 3. Nature of protective clothing and PPE for the worker: If the worker would have performed different tasks on the treated crops, he must wear: - Nitrile gloves certified EN 374-3; - Working coverall 65% polyester / 35% cotton; minimum 230 g/m²; with water repellent treatment. 3.1.4 Residues and Consumer Exposure The data available are considered sufficient for risk assessment. An exceedance of the current MRL for deltamethrin as laid down in Reg. (EU) 396/2005 is not expected. The chronic and the short-term intakes of deltamethrin residues resulting from the uses proposed in the framework of this application are unlikely to present a public health concern. As far as consumer health protection is concerned, agrees with the authorization of the intended use. According to available data, no specific mitigation measures should apply.
Page 10 of 31 Summary of the evaluation The preparation is composed of deltamethrin. Table 3.1.43.1-1: Summary for deltamethrin Crop Plant metabolism covered? Sufficient residue trials? PHI sufficiently supported? Sample storage covered by stability data? MRL compliance Reg 441/2012 Chronic risk for consumers identified? Acute risk for consumers identified? Comments Spinach Yes Yes (5 NEU) Yes Yes Yes No No The effects of processing on the nature of deltamethrin residues have been investigated. Data on effects of processing on the amount of residue have been submitted. These data were not considered for risk assessment. Residues in succeeding crops have been sufficiently investigated taking into account the specific circumstances of the cgap uses being considered here. It is very unlikely that residues will be present in succeeding crops. Considering dietary burden and based on the intended uses, no significant modification of the intake was calculated for livestock. Further investigation of residues as well as the modification of MRLs in commodities of animal origin is therefore not necessary. Summary for Table 3.1.4-2: Information on (KCA 6.8) Crop PHI for DECIS PROTECH proposed by applicant PHI/ Withholding period* sufficiently supported for deltamethrin PHI for DECIS PROTECH proposed by zrms zrms Comments (if different PHI proposed) Spinach 3 days Yes 3 days NR: not relevant * Purpose of withholding period to be specified ** F: PHI is defined by the application stage at last treatment (time elapsing between last treatment and harvest of the crop). 3.1.5 Environmental fate and behaviour Not relevant for this application. 3.1.6 Ecotoxicology Refer to the decision of product authorization. 3.1.7 Efficacy According to Article 51 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the efficacy assessment and the absence of any phytotoxicity risk on the crop is not necessary. 3.2 Conclusions arising from French assessment
Page 11 of 31 Taking into account the above assessment, an authorisation can be granted as proposed in Appendix 1 Copy of the product decision. 3.3 Further information to permit a decision to be made or to support a review of the conditions and restrictions associated with the authorisation No further information is required.
Page 12 of 31 Appendix 1 Copy of the French decision
Page 13 of 31
Page 14 of 31
Page 15 of 31
Page 16 of 31
Page 17 of 31
Page 18 of 31 Appendix 2 Copy of the draft product label as proposed by the applicant
Page 19 of 31
Page 20 of 31
Page 21 of 31
Page 22 of 31
Page 23 of 31
Page 24 of 31
Page 25 of 31
Page 26 of 31
Page 27 of 31
Page 28 of 31
Page 29 of 31
Page 30 of 31
Page 31 of 31 Appendix 3 Letter(s) of Access Not applicable