Tulare County Office of Education Classified Personnel Evaluation Form

Similar documents
Informal observations may occur anytime, formal observations will be scheduled in advance.

Mesa Public Schools Classified Employee Evaluation Worksheet. Competency: Task and Technical Skills. Position: A. Job Knowledge

OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATIVE & SUPPORT STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

ADMINISTRATIVE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Washoe County School District. Professional Growth Systems WCSD. Education Support Personnel (ESP) Performance Standards

CITY OF CORAL GABLES EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROFESSIONAL/OFFICE/TECHNICAL - CG101

Employee Performance Evaluation HR-500

1. PERFORMANCE FACTORS

Classified Employee Performance Rubric

page 1 1. JOB KNOWLEDGE RATING

UNIT 11 Performance Evaluation Graduate Assistants, Instructional Student Assistants, Teaching Associates

STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RATING SCALE AND KEY DESCRIPTORS

UNIT 11 Performance Evaluation Graduate Assistants, Instructional Student Assistants, Teaching Associates

New Employee Evaluation Form

Iredell Statesville Schools Classified Evaluation Form

Annual By Request Probationary First Probationary Second Probationary Third

Essex County College Performance Evaluation Guide Non Instructional Personnel

Classified Evaluation System

Guide to Defining Performance Levels

Administrative and Professional Staff (Unclassified) Performance Evaluation Model D

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR NON-CERTIFIED PERSONNEL

CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ROCKFORD EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Performance Appraisal Review for Non-Exempt Employees. Instructions

NON - EXEMPT EMPLOYEE SELF APPRAISAL

William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund 2012 Performance Appraisal

School of Veterinary Medicine Academic & University Staff Performance Evaluation Form

Employee Probationary Performance Review

Millard School District Classified Employee Evaluation and Improvement Report

Job Search Readiness Checklist**

Performance Management and Evaluation for Administrators and Technical Professionals

NON - EXEMPT EMPLOYEE

STAFF PERFORMANCE RATING GUIDE

Performance Planning and Development Annual Review Form

RBH. Management Referral Packet Conduct. Employee Assistance Program (EAP) Making an EAP Referral. Required Referrals. Recommending the EAP

Educational Support Personnel Evaluation Handbook

Knowledge frequently exceeds what is required to perform well.

Policy Procedure Guideline

LOCAL 152 EMPLOYEE EVALUATION

North County Fire Authority PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL REPORT

Schedule 7: Employee Performance Appraisal

State Employees PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND REVIEW (PPR) Form INSTRUCTIONS SHEET

APPRAISAL INSTRUCTIONS

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEES

ACP EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL 2017

North Orange County Community College District CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (PERMANENT) PART I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

Instruction Manual. May 2017 Performance Appraisal Process Local 2324 Represented Employees

SERVICE PERSONNEL EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

Southern University System Annual Employee Evaluation Form for Executive Level Staff/Directors/Department Heads

Attendance Attendance refers to the consistency that an employee shows in turning up for work and completing their normal work hours.

(5) EXCEPTIONAL: Consistently exceeds all relevant performance standards. Highly productive, innovative, responsive and generates top quality work.

Food Service Employee Evaluation

CSEA PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Commendable Satisfactory Needs Improvement

TURTLE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE EMPLOYEE EVALUATION FORM JOB TITLE: DATE: Other:

STAFF ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Cheyney University of Pennsylvania Management Performance Appraisal Guidelines

Non-.Certified Staff Performan:ce Ap!ipraisalRe.port

OUTSTANDING Rating 5

Central Kitchen Manager

FINAL INTERNSHIP EVALUATION

Full-Time & Part-Time Staff Six Month Performance Evaluation

LSUHSC-SCHOOL OF MEDICINE PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND REVIEW FORM

CLASSIFIED STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM FY

Ministry/Department/Unit... Name: Last Name First Name Middle Initial. Date of Birth: / / Sex: Male Female D / M / Y Social Security Number:

Town of Sunapee Supervisory Performance Evaluation. Employee Last First Middle. Probationary progress Conclusion of probation

LEADERSHIP PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA ANNUAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Comprehensive Form

WORKPLACE SUCCESS SKILLS SYSTEM

Staff PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM

Staff PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM

Staff PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM

Supervisor s Guide: Performance Evaluations

UNCLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Staff PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM

PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS TOOLKIT REVIEW

ADMINISTRATION PERFORMANCE RATING GUIDE

RICHLAND COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT ONE, SOUTH CAROLINA JOB DESCRIPTION, SEPTEMBER 1996 JOB TITLE: TRANSPORTATION SUPERVISOR TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT

SOCIAL WORKER SUPERVISOR III SOCIAL SERVICES

December A course in Leadership Development

CAREER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION - Employee. Type of Evaluation: Probationary* (6 month evaluation)

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN

If an adequate segregation of duties does not exist, the following could occur:

houston independent school district HISD Non-Teacher Appraisal System COMPETENCIES AND RUBRIC

INDUSTRIAL TRAINING (AOM26)

JOB DESCRIPTION HUMAN RESOURCE ASSISTANT Human Resource Management GENERAL STATEMENT OF JOB

TALENT REVIEW INSTRUCTIONS

Services and Forms for Faculty and Staff

Demographics. General Instructions. Rating Scale. Department:

Leadership Performance Appraisal FY17. Demographics. General Instructions. Rating Scale. Department:

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL. Again, a major deficiency in most practices is lack of effective

Executive Self-Assessment HR-515

Performance Management Feedback Program Courier Drivers and Pages Annual Summary

ANNUAL APPRAISAL FORM

Tennessee State University Employee Performance Evaluation

Performance Improvement Policy A guide to addressing poor performance

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SUPPORT STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM FY

CONTRA COSTA WATER DISTRICT Operations & Maintenance Employee Performance Evaluation Form

Managerial Competency Guide

Managerial Competency Guide

Transcription:

Classified Personnel Evaluation Form Name Classification SS# Work Location Permanent 5th Month Name of Supervisor Probationary 9th Month Performance Dimensions. Check the phrases in each column that most nearly describe the employee s performance over the period covered by this evaluation. 1. QUALITY OF WORK consists of the productivity and accuracy with which duties are performed. A. NEATNESS/ACCURACY Work was presentable and accurate. Work was acceptable; occasional mistakes were made. Work was often unpresentable and contained numerous errors. B. PRODUCTIVITY Made effective use of time; met deadlines. Usually made good use of time; met most deadlines. Made poor use of time; frequently missed deadlines. C. JOB DESCRIPTION Tasks performed met the guidelines of the job description. Tasks performed sometimes met the guidelines of the job description. Tasks performed seldom met the guidelines of the job description. 2. JOB KNOWLEDGE consists of job information, application of efficient methods, and skills the employee has for satisfactory performance. A. JOB INFORMATION Major phases of job understood. Knowledge of some phases of the job was incomplete. Knowledge about key aspects of the job was inadequate. B. METHODS Methods used were effective and efficient. Some methods were ineffective and not completed in a timely fashion. Methods used were ineffective and/or inefficient. 3. ATTENDANCE AND PUNCTUALITY consists of being at work on time. A. ATTENDANCE Attendance was satisfactory; absences Extensive absences were due to Absences were excessive; absences B. PUNCTUALITY Reported to work on time Usually on time Frequently tardy C. SKILLS Required skills were strong. Some skills needed improvement. Needed skills were absent or below an acceptable level. C. ADHERENCE TO WORK SCHEDULE Always follows established work schedule. Occasionally extends work break or leaves work early. Frequently extends work breaks or leaves work early. 4. WORK CHARACTERISTICS are initiative and resourcefulness, adaptability and attitude, and ability to prioritize. A. INITIATIVE AND RESOURCEFULNESS Needs were identified and problems were solved independently; was a selfstarter. Employee usually initiated required action and solved problems independently. Needs were overlooked or not seen by employee; assistance was required to solve problems. B. ADAPTABILITY Accepted new ideas readily; was flexible in making changes; dealt with stress in a positive manner. Adapted to change, but with some reservations; sometimes unable to deal with stressful situations in a positive manner. Refused to accept new ideas and changes readily. Stressful situations or change were met with tension, loss of poise, or other ineffective behavior. C. ATTITUDE Positive feeling about work was presented to others. Positive attitude typically displayed. Negative or hostile attitude displayed; dissatisfaction with, or open dislike for job apparent. D. PRIORITIZING Prioritized so that changing demands were met. Prioritizing occasionally neglected, resulting in important tasks not being Prioritizing ineffective, frequently resulting in assigned tasks not being

Classified Personnel Evaluation Page 2 Employee Name: 5. WORKING RELATIONSHIPS are the courtesy and tact, discretion, effective communication and positive relationships that an employee displays at work. A. COURTESY AND TACT Courtesy and tact were demonstrated. Courtesy and tact were usually displayed. Behavior often seen as tactless or discourteous; difficult to deal with. B. DISCRETION There were no known violations of job related confidentiality, nor other inappropriate discussion of job matters. There were some violations of confidentiality. There was evidence that confidentiality was not observed. C. ORAL COMMUNICA- TION Communicated effectively orally, attention to other speaker was apparent. Oral and listening skills usually effective. Talked too much or not enough to get the job done effectively; poor listening skills. D. RELATIONSHIP WITH CO-WORKERS Willing to help coworkers without being requested; demonstrated ability to work as a positive team member. Willing to help coworkers only if requested. Unwilling or unable to help co-workers; not an effective team member. E. RELATIONSHIP WITH SUPERVISOR Readily accepted and suggestions of supervisor. Usually accepted and most suggestions of supervisor. Did not accept or suggestions of supervisor; was argumentative. 6. DEPENDABILITY is getting required work done with a minimum of supervision following oral and/or written instructions. A. SUPERVISION REQUIRED Minimum supervision was required. Supervision was occasionally required to ensure that work was Supervision was required in order to get assigned work done. B. FOLLOWING ORAL AND WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS Instructions were followed; employee typically needed instructions only once. Instructions were followed with some errors; repeating of instructions was necessary. Instructions were frequently not followed and/or needed to be repeated frequently. 7. PERSONAL APPEARANCE consists of the personal appearance of the employee, as well as their work station. Employee was well groomed and dressed appropriately for the work place. Employee was usually well groomed; at times dressed inappropriately for the work place. Employee exhibited grooming problems and/or dressed inappropriately for the work place. 8. WORKSTATION EFFICIENCY consists of orderliness and organization of the workstation for ultimate efficiency. Work station was always orderly and organized for efficiency. Some untidiness and disorganization evident which has resulted in some inefficiency. Work station usually appeared untidy and disorganized which has led to inefficiency. 9. USE OF EQUIPMENT is the correct operation and maintenance of equipment expected of employee. (Note: Evaluator may wish to indicate kinds of equipment.) Employee displayed appropriate knowledge of use and maintenance of equipment. Better judgment and knowledge was needed in using equipment. Assigned equipment was used carelessly or inappropriately. 10. SAFETY PRACTICES Safe working procedures were followed, potential hazards were corrected; had accident-free history. Generally followed safe working procedures. Did not follow safe working procedures; occasionally took potentially unsafe shortcuts.

Classified Personnel Evaluation Page 3 Employee Name: 11. SANITATION (for Custodial & S.H. Instructional Aide positions): Used approved sanitation procedures; spotted unsanitary conditions and sought to correct. Sanitation was at acceptable level; expected amount of care was taken. Sanitation practices and procedures were not followed at an acceptable level. NOT APPLICABLE 12. FOR INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES: A. LEARNING B. MOTIVATION ENVIRONMENT Used positive reinforcements Worked well with students with students; motivated and individually and in small encouraged students to groups to meet their needs. achieve. Worked well with some At times used positive students to meet their reinforcement with students; needs. inconsistent in encouragement Did not work well with of students. students. Little or no use of positive reinforcement or encouragement to succeed. C. STUDENT CONTROL Demonstrated consistency in assisting the teacher to maintain and control classroom behavior. Demonstrated some ability to assist teacher to maintain and control classroom behavior, but waited for teacher to direct before taking action. Was not able to maintain and control classroom behavior. NOT APPLICABLE OVERALL EMPLOYEE RATING SUMMARY: This general rating is one which best describes the overall performance of the employee. At this time, the overall performance has been acceptable and meets the standards and requirements of Tulare County Office of Education. At this time, the performance needs improvement and is deficient in meeting the standards and requirements of Tulare County Office of Education. This employee exhibits potential for improvement. Improvement must be demonstrated by in order for continued employment to be recommended. A specific plan for improvement is attached. This employee is not meeting the required standards of Tulare County Office of Education and is not recommended for continued employment. RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS: (Include explanation of any rating other than the first or second boxes selected in any category. Use additional page, if necessary.)

EMPLOYEE COMMENTS: A signature on this performance appraisal does not mean that the employee agrees with the opinions expressed, but merely indicates that the employee has read the performance appraisal and has been given the opportunity to discuss, comment and react by written response. Signature of Employee: Date: Signature of Evaluator: Date:

EMPLOYEE IMPROVEMENT PLAN Employee Name: Determination of Objectives Date: Supervisor: Evaluation Conference Date: OBJECTIVE ACTIVITIES TIMELINESS ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE TO BE UTILIZED DEGREE OF ACHIEVEMENT Evaluatee Evaluator Signature of Evaluatee Date Signature of Evaluator Date