CAPA Management: Best Practices and FDA QSR Mandate WHITE PAPER. ComplianceQuest In-Depth Analysis and Review

Similar documents
Prevent Quality System Deficiencies by Conducting Effective Internal Audits. Whitepaper

UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT WHEN PRINTED

DOCUMENT REVISION HISTORY PAGE. 90C0010 X 2 of 20. Revision History Of Document

Addressing Key FDA Citations with Training. Align UL EduNeering Courses to Top FDA Warning Letter Topics

ISO FDA QSR. ISO and FDA QSR: A Step by Step Guide to Complying with Medical Device QMS Requirements

Quality System Regulation (QSR) Training

LIFE SCIENCE BENCHMARKING STUDY. Trends and Best Practices Based on Our Work with the US FDA and Over 250 Companies

The Impact of Quality Culture on Quality Risk Management. FDA Perspective on Quality Culture; how it Impacts Risk Management

Top Seven Risks to Consider When Selecting a Life Science LMS

Purchasing Controls. FDA Small Business Regulatory Education for Industry (REdI) Conference Denver, Colorado May 13, 2015

Quality Assurance / Quality Control Plan

Strategies to Revise Quality Policy and Quality Objectives. Eileen Cortes February 22, 2017

TURBO MACH A DIVISION OF VT SAA

WARNING LETTER AUG 3, 2016

FDA 21 CFR Part 820 vs. ISO 13485:2016 Comparison Table created by greenlight.guru

Leading Practices on Compliance Series: Design History File (DHF): Tips for Creating a Successful DHF Tuesday, November 27, :00 1:00 pm Eastern

ACCREDITATION CRITERIA FOR FABRICATOR INSPECTION PROGRAMS FOR WOOD WALL PANELS AC196. April 2017 (Effective June 1, 2017) PREFACE

January 24, WARNING LETTER (08-ATL-04 )

Documenta tion and Records

GMP The Other Side of Chemistry, Manufacturing & Controls (CMC)

MDSAP AUDIT PROCESS. A Manufacturer s Perspective. Connie Hoy EVP Regulatory Affairs Cynosure, Inc.

Wilson-Hurd ATF Quality Manual

ISPE NORDIC COP CLEAN UTILITIES SEPTEMBER TUUSULA FINLAND. Timo Kuosmanen STERIS Finn-Aqua

I /+F/-5-j- * SERWCIS

Quality Systems Basics

Safety Manual. SEMS Program

Packaging Operations Technical Subcommittee

DATA INTEGRITY ASSURANCE AS KEY FACTOR FOR SURVIVING CORPORATE AUDITS AND REGULATORY INSECTIONS

Embracing a Culture of Self Correction

13.0 Quality Improvement in the HRPP Program

Copyright 2010 OsteoMed LLC Arapaho Road, Addison TX Main Phone Main Fax Fax (QA)

Lifecycle Product Quality Risk Management

FDA Initiatives and Regulatory Trends for Life Sciences. Larry Spears President L. Spears Consulting

ASTM D10-F02 Workshop FDA Regulatory Perspective. Patrick Weixel FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health

FOOD AND DRUGS AUTHORITY GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING PHARMACOVIGILANCE INSPECTIONS

How to Implement and Maintain a Modern CAPA System While Avoiding Common Pitfalls. Jon D. Speer, Founder & VP QA/RA Greenlight Guru

Patrick Malloy Communities Quality Assurance System

INS QA Programme Requirements

U. S. Department of Energy. Consolidated Audit Program Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities. Checklist 1 Quality Assurance Management Systems

Medical Device Purchasing Controls Challenges of Compliance in a World Market June, 2013 OMTEC

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

6 Steps to Effective Supplier Quality Audits. A Guide For Medical Device Companies

10 "Must-Haves" for the Life Sciences Learning Management System

Internal Auditing and Control of Nonconforming Work

Association of American Railroads Quality Assurance System Evaluation (QASE) Checklist Rev. 1/12/2017

CSV Inspection Readiness through Effective Document Control. Eileen Cortes April 27, 2017

August 11, 2005 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS

Windchill Quality Management

Jeff Chilton, VP of Consulting Services, Alchemy

Subpart B Organization and Personnel, 21 CFR Responsibilities of the quality control unit.

GxP Auditing, Remediation, and Staff Augmentation

Quality Management in PV. Andrea Lohée, Pharm-AD DCVMN training on PV, May 2017

Quality Management System Plan

21 CFR Ch. I ( Edition) Personnel Design controls Identification Traceability.

GxP Auditing, Remediation, and Staff Augmentation

WARNING LETTER CMS #

BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY SBMS Interim Procedure

Quality Management. Carlos Bachier, MD

Metrics in Microbiology Monitoring Practices

QUALITY MANUAL. This document defines the requirements, processes, structure and documentation for the Teledyne DGO Quality Management System.

ADVISORY CIRCULAR AC

THE COMMANDER NAVY REGION, SOUTHWEST (CNRSW) HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (HAZMAT) OPERATIONS QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP) 20 June 2000

GxP Auditing, Remediation, and Quality System Resourcing

CORPORATE QUALITY MANUAL

Transforming Change Management with Modern Systems

Lessons from Pharmaceutical Laboratory related FDA Warning Letters

Guidelines for Pharmacovigilance Inspections

HACCP Today: Critical Controls Concepts

Best practices in Quality Metrics. Vivek Arora Partner, McKinsey & Company IPA CONFERENCE FEBRUARY 2019

Supplier Quality Agreements

REQUIREMENTS FOR SAFETY RELATED (ASME AND NON-ASME) ITEMS OR SERVICES

Interpharm Praha A.S. 10/18/16

Data Collection Tools Functions, Indicators & Sub-Indicators

Applying a quality systems approach to improve supply chain management

Supplier Assessment Questionnaire Audit Date : On-Site Audit Self Assessment Audit

SUCCESS STORY ON DEVIATIONS & CAPA MANAGEMENT. Teamwork & Quality Expertise for Timely Corrections & Improved Compliance in Manufacturing

AAMI Quality Systems White Paper: Comparison of 21 CFR Part 820 to ISO 13485:2016 1

An Industry Perspective

GENERIC QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR: BUILT TO PRINT ITEMS, ITEMS TO STANDARD AND OFF THE SHELF ITEMS

Densified Fuel Inspection Program

Annual ASQ San Diego Quality Conference

Ensuring Quality & Regulatory Compliance when Collaborating with a Service Provider

Harmonizing Manufacturing across Multiple Sites and Regions

Compliance and Quality Monitoring: What, Why, When, and How

COMPLIANCE BY DESIGN FOR PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY CONTROL LABORATORIES INSIGHT FROM FDA WARNING LETTERS

Kathy Weil Division of Bioresearch Monitoring Office of Compliance Center for Devices and Radiological Health US Food and Drug Administration

Computer System Validation - Reduce Costs and Avoid 483s

Reliance Aerospace Solutions

Good Distribution Practices Toolkit. Quality Management System 08 March 2016

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

Florida Department of Transportation Office of Freight, Logistics and Passenger Operations Part 4 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISIONS #TRIPS-17-CA-RFP

CLIA Challenges in Laboratory Consolidation

PAI Inspections, Observations and Data Integrity

The Theranos 483s. What can we learn? David Amor, MS, CQA Principal, Medgineering

My Definition of Deviation

Supplier Quality Requirements SQR-1.0 Rev. 3

To establish supplier quality requirements applicable to the type of product or service procured by Hudson MFG LLC.

QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL MANUAL

GARY W. CHANCE San Jose, Ca Hello, I am seeking a Quality position utilizing my capabilities and experience within your Quality group.

Transcription:

CAPA Management: Best Practices and FDA QSR Mandate WHITE PAPER ComplianceQuest In-Depth Analysis and Review

CAPA Management: Best Practices and FDA QSR Mandate Establishing a corrective and preventive action (CAPA) system is a quality system requirement for Medical Device firms marketing products in the United States. Although the FDA has always expected regulated industries to perform corrective and preventive actions, establishing a unified CAPA system makes good business sense. The first and most important step in creating any system is to include all regulatory requirements in the firm's standard operating procedures (SOPs). The following are seven key elements from 21 CFR 820.100 (Each manufacturer shall establish and maintain procedures for implementing corrective and preventive action.) This should be included in a firm's SOPs: To get a handle on the CAPA system is a company wide effort. The following elements will provide what each company should do to create, maintain and leverage a sound CAPA platform. 1. Document Procedures It is important to define in a company's SOPs as which events should be promoted to a CAPA request and which qualified resource will have the final say. All the necessary CAPA process steps, which details on how a CAPA will be addressed, should be properly documented. 2. Qualified Resources QSR requirements mandate that companies have staff with qualified training, knowledge, and experience for the job. This staffing includes experienced quality assurance (QA) staff, who will manage the CAPA system. In addition, firms must invest in the databases and computer software that can perform the necessary processes. Device companies must include CAPA information in their required management reviews.

3. Information Source Companies should identify all the data sources they will use to recognize existing problems as well as potential problems for a CAPA system to function properly. A few of the good data sources for identifying existing and potential problems are acceptance activities, complaints, FDA-483 observations or warning letters, nonconformance or deviations, process monitoring data, calibration & preventive maintenance records, internal, external, supplier and third party audits, and customer or employee feedback. 4. Analyze Data should be examined on a regular basis. Trending should be done at least quarterly to be useful. In many cases, trending should be completed more frequently, such as on a monthly or daily basis. 5. Timeliness and Accuracy Are Key Companies must ensure the timeliness and accuracy of data being received into their systems. Companies must ensure that all the necessary data should be received, entered into a computer system and reviewed promptly. Such electronic systems must be 21 CFR Part 11 compliant, so records cannot be overwritten or deleted without a trace. Employees should be trained to immediately notify the QA department when they deviate from an established procedure or work instruction. A surveillance system is only as good as the information it receives. 6. Investigation As part of the investigation, companies must use statistical methods, when possible, so that they analyze data appropriately, while comparing data across different sources. The companies should look across all data, products, and facilities to detect recurring product problems as well as glitches within their quality system. While teaching employees how to conduct a problem investigation, they should also be trained to always include a good problem definition statement. It is helpful to review pertinent FDA inspection guides during

training and discuss how to investigate a problem using case studies from recent FDA-483s or warning letters. 7. Root-Cause Analysis Training It is essential that employees be competent in root-cause analysis and how to conduct a problem investigation. Causes often extend beyond the area or function where they are detected, so for major problems, assemble a crossfunctional team to perform the root-cause analysis. 8. Internal Audits FDA considers audits as one of the most important QA tools, so firms should routinely perform internal and quality audits. Current industry practice is to audit each QSR area at least once a year, and more frequently if there are problems in a particular area. Checking the status of CAPA items (to make sure that they are completed, and that the same problems are not repeating). It is an important step to take in an internal audit. 9. CA/PA Documentation, Follow-up and Reviews A clear and documented plan that includes deliverables and due dates should be developed as soon as the root causes of a problem are known. CAPA requests that have been open for more than a few months should require a written or periodic review to evaluate their status. Document that are expected to be complete, are still open, or whether additional resources are needed, etc. For long-term CAPAs, written status reports should be required, at least every 30 days. 10. Risk Management A clearly defined risk management process should be in place for elevating key items to senior management. Some companies may categorize risk by levels or by terminology (such as a critical, major, or minor risk a critical item being one that can lead to possible patient injury or FDA regulatory action). Many firms place a QA executive or management representative in charge of immediately notifying senior management about serious quality issues and ongoing

investigations. Routine information about quality system performance can be reported to management in periodic management reviews, monthly reports, weekly group meetings, etc. Bottom Line Depending on the maturity of a CAPA system, it may take some time to get it into the structure it should be. Bear in mind that a good way to start, is by improving any critical deficiencies first. Many companies in the medical device industry will admit that they are not yet pleased with (and are continually improving) their CAPA system. A company's CAPA system gets to the heart of all its employees' ability to think critically, to the quality and caliber of its QA executive and staff, and to the organization's commitment to the quality of its products. About ComplianceQuest: ComplianceQuest, an innovative 100% cloud based Enterprise Quality Management System solution company, provides an enterprise grade solution platform that streamlines quality, compliance, content and collaboration management initiatives and strategies across your enterprise and globally based supply chain networks. ComplianceQuest helps accelerate manufacturers and distributors to accomplishing their most challenging quality, compliance and supplier management goals. http://compliancequest.com/ ComplianceQuest, 2014