Lake Fire Restoration and Hazardous Tree Removal. Project Proposed Action and Scoping Document

Similar documents
General Location: Approximately 6 miles east of Huntsville, Utah along the South Fork of the Ogden River (Figure 1)

Hungry Creek Watershed Road Maintenance and Stony Quarry Development

Moonlight Aquatic Organism Passage Project

NRCS Standards and Criteria for Dead Animal Composting

KENTUCKY UTILITIES SPECIAL USE AUTHORIZATION AMENDMENT: MOUNT VICTORY TRANSMISSION TOWER REPLACEMENT DECISION MEMO

Hassayampa Landscape Restoration Environmental Assessment

Lambson Draw On/Off Allotment Livestock Conversion Decision Notice

PROPOSED ACTION FOR THE NAVAJO CINDER PIT RECLAMATION PROJECT

Tower Fire Salvage. Economics Report. Prepared by: Doug Nishek Forester. for: Priest Lake Ranger District Idaho Panhandle National Forests

Recreation Report Kimball Hill Stands Management Gold Beach Ranger District, Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest Date: April 27, 2016

DECISION MEMO MANHATTAN FUELS REDUCTION PROJECT U.S. FOREST SERVICE CANYON LAKES RANGER DISTRICT LARIMER COUNTY, CO

Decision Memo for the City of Detroit Root Rot Timber Sale Project

OUTREACH NOTICE 2018 TEMPORARY POSITIONS BEAVERHEAD-DEERLODGE NATIONAL FOREST HOW TO APPLY: RECREATION POSITIONS BEING HIRED:

Decision Memo North Boundary Salvage

Decision Memo. Programmatic Forest Plan Amendment for Cultural Resource Protection Standards and Guidelines. United States Department of Agriculture

Storrie and Rich Fire Area Watershed Improvement and Forest Road 26N67 Re-alignment Project

BACKGROUND DECISION. June 2016 Page 1 of 6

Water Talk Series

Scoping Report for the Aldridge Creek Tornado Salvage Project 51712

Huron-Manistee National Forests Mio Ranger District 107 McKinley Road Mio, MI 48647

Bastrop & Caldwell County Water Resources

PROJECT INFORMATION Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project

Logo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information Highway 35 Agriculture

Huron-Manistee National Forests Mio Ranger District 107 McKinley Road Mio, MI 48647

ART & SCIENCE OF GRAZING MANAGEMENT Science. Art. This is NOT the Goal! Why Management-intensive Grazing (MiG)?

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Coconino National Forest Red Rock Ranger District. File Code: Date:

DECISION NOTICE FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI)

Final Decision Memo. Murphy Meadow Restoration Project. USDA Forest Service Willamette National Forest McKenzie River Ranger District

Telegraph Forest Management Project

Vestal Project Proposed Action Hell Canyon Ranger District Black Hills National Forest April 2011

North Fork Blackfoot Trail Bridges Project

SOUTH TEXAS ECOTYPE APPROACH TO RANGELAND RESTORATION

BANDIT TIMBER SALE Highlights Iron River Ranger District OTTAWA NATIONAL FOREST The Bandit Timber Sale Area is along the south side of FR 3110, 2.1 mi

Recreation Resources Report

Decision Memo Hungry Creek Watershed Road Maintenance and Stony Quarry Development Project

DECISION MEMO JASON MINE-BAT HABITAT IMPROVEMENT AND MINE CLOSURE Section 22, T. 13S., R. 2W. Union County, Illinois

SHASTA-MCCLOUD MANAGEMENT UNIT OVER SNOW VEHICLE TRAIL GROOMING AND SNOWMOBILE FACILITY MAINTENANCE PROPOSAL

Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact for the Arizona Interconnection Project Access Roads Permitting EA

DECISION MEMO WEST RIVER COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY BURIED FIBER OPTIC CABLE PROJECT

DECISION MEMO Eureka Fire Whitebark Pine Planting

Supervisor s Office 5162 Valleypointe Parkway Roanoke, VA

DECISION MEMO. Wildlife Habitat Improvement Project Wildlife Opening Construction, Rehabilitation and Expansion FY

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. CHAPTER 34 Estimating Corn Seedling Emergence and Variability

Scoping and 30-Day Notice and Comment Period for. Grassy Knob American Chestnut Planting

DECISION MEMO PAYETTE LAKES SKI CLUB BEAR BASIN AMENDMENT U.S. FOREST SERVICE PAYETTE NATIONAL FOREST MCCALL RANGER DISTRICT ADAMS COUNTY, IDAHO

NRCS Water Quality Practices

Porcupine Vegetation and Road Management Project - Shasta Salamander Report - June 23, 2011

Engineering Watershed, Soil, & Air

DECISION MEMO FOURTH OF JULY PARK 2 USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Red River Ranger District, Nez Perce National Forest Idaho County, Idaho

Upper Applegate Road Hazardous Fuel Reduction Project

Draft Decision Memo OHV Trails 22 and 42 Reroute Project

SCOPING STATEMENT OF THE PROPOSED ACTION FOR THE

Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors United States Department of Agriculture

Public Rock Collection

United States Department of Agriculture. Forest Service. Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest. September 2014

Draft Pine Mountain Late- Successional Reserve Habitat Protection and Enhancement Project

Short Form Botany Resource Reports:

Botany Resource Reports:

2014 Farm Bill. FACT SHEET March Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program for 2015 and Subsequent Years

Elk Rice Project. Environmental Assessment. April Kootenai National Forest Cabinet Ranger District. Sanders County, Montana

Proposed Action. for the. North 40 Scrub Management Project

Upper Fryingpan Vegetation Management Project

DECISION MEMO Robinhood Creek Helicopter Log Deck June, 2008

Locally Led Conservation & The Local Work Group. Mark Habiger NRCS

Stonewall Vegetation Project FEIS Errata

Effect of Cattle Grazing, Seeded Grass, and an Herbicide on Ponderosa Pine Seedling Survival and Growth

Cheat Mountain Wildlife Habitat Enhancement

Decision Memo. Cabin #5 Electric, Water, Septic Improvements

Proposed Action for Motorized Travel Management on the North Kaibab Ranger District

DECISION MEMO. Griz Thin (Stand )


Forest Glen Recreation Residence Septic System Improvements Soils Report Shasta-Trinity National Forest January 2011

THE ROLE OF BIOCONTROL OF EMERALD ASH BORER

Decision Memo El Paso CGP Company, LLC Special Use Authorization

Rural Manufacturing at a Glance, 2017 Edition

Site Location Species Acres Treatment Method

Environmental Assessment for Jackson Thinning

Harvest, Employment, Exports, and Prices in Pacific Northwest Forests,

DECISION NOTICE & FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT RAT RIVER RECREATIONAL TRAIL

CORN BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES APPENDIX A. Corn Planting Guide

Rock Creek Fuels and Vegetation Project

Tenmile and Priest Pass Restoration Project Scoping Notice

Why does the Forest Service need to propose this activity at this time?

Kinder/Morgan Southern Natural Gas. Right-of-Way Maintenance Project Woody Vegetation Control. Decision Notice And Finding of No Significant Impact

Draft Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact (DN/FONSI)

Decision Memo Tongass National Forest. Wrangell Ranger District. Pre-Commercial Thinning CE 2010

PROJECT INFORMATION Warren Falls Parking Lot Expansion Project

Draft Decision Memo Santiam Junction Maintenance Station Truck Shop Extension

Recreation and Scenery Specialist Report

Environmental Assessment

Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact

Contact your local USDA Farm Service Agency Service Center Office for more information and to apply.

Invasive Dandelion Removal in the Alpine Zone. Decision Memo. White Mountain National Forest, NH and ME

Dominant-Tree Thinning in New England Northern Hardwoods a Second Look

Preliminary Decision Memo Recreation Residence Septic Repairs

United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service

Scenery Report Salmon Reforestation Project

DECISION MEMO SMART CREEK MINERAL EXPLORATION PROJECT

Role of Woody Species in (Riparian) Buffer Plantings

Transcription:

United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service November 2016 Lake Fire Restoration and Hazardous Tree Removal Heather McRae Project Proposed Action and Scoping Document USDA Forest Service Shasta-Trinity National Forest P.O. Box 1620 McCloud, CA 96057 (530) 964-3770 Mountaintop Ranger District San Bernardino National Forest San Bernardino County, California For Project Information Contact: Bob Bayer, Project Team Leader USDA Forest Service 802-362-2625 Email preferred: rbayer@fs.fed.us For General Information About The San Bernardino National Forest Contact: The Mountaintop Ranger District San Bernardino National Forest Fawnskin, CA 92333 909-382-2790

In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD- 3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) Mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights 1400 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) Fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) Email: program.intake@usda.gov. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Introduction The Lake Fire Restoration and Hazardous Tree Removal Project (Lake Fire project) is a reforestation project that includes tree planting and hazardous tree removal to address safety concerns, and restore forest health to approximately 2,000 acres burned during the 2015 Lake Fire. The project area is located in San Bernardino County on the San Bernardino National Forest, Front Country and Mountaintop Ranger Districts, within Township 1 North, Range 1 East, Sections 13, 21-24 and 26, Township 1 North, Range 2 East, Sections 19-21, 27-29 and 33-35, Township 1 North, Range 3 East, Sections 8 and 20, and Township 1 South, Range 2 East, Sections 1-3. This project includes areas within and adjacent to the San Gorgonio Wilderness. See Figure 1: Project Vicinity Map. Purpose and Need Purpose of the Lake Fire Restoration and Hazardous Tree Removal Project The Lake Fire Project is a reforestation project that includes tree planting and hazardous tree removal to address safety concerns, and restore forest health to approximately 2,000 acres burned during the 2015 Lake Fire. Planting would occur in non-wilderness land, and hazard trees would be removed from within and outside the San Gorgonio Wilderness as necessary to provide for safety along roads and trails within the burn area. The intent is to restore severely burned areas establishing forest cover, minimizing erosion and other adverse environmental effects. The Lake Fire project is intended to meet Forest Plan management direction that provides the framework for addressing National Strategic goals, national priorities, and Forest Plan goals and objectives. Goal 1.2 is to restore forest health where alteration of natural fire regimes have put human and natural resource values at risk (Forest Plan Part 1, page 21; USDA Forest Service 2005a). The present condition of the vegetation on southern California national forests has been influenced by a century of fire management, mostly fire suppression. Before suppression, fires were frequent, and because of frequent reoccurrence, they were mainly low severity fires. This is particularly the case for the montane conifer forests of this region. Forests burned often because of seasonal, high-elevation lightning storms. Frequent fires produced a patchwork of small burns that constantly thinned stands, kept fuel loading low and encouraged the regeneration of shade-intolerant plant species. However, with the success of fire suppression, these forests have not burned with any regularity, and when they do, they are more likely to burn as stand replacing crown fires that cover a much larger area and threatens populations and resources. The Lake Fire of 2015, typical of most large fires, burned over a large area in mosaic pattern, in which some stands burned extensively while others within the fire s perimeter either didn t burn or burned lightly. The primary purpose of the Lake Fire project is to complete restoration of a portion of the burned area while providing for safety and is consistent with the San Bernardino National Forest strategy (FH 1) of restoring vegetation through reforestation and revegetation or other appropriate methods after stand replacing fires, drought, or other events or activities that degrade or cause a loss of plant communities (Forest Plan Part 2, page 130; USDA Forest Service 2005a). This involves planting shade-intolerant species such as Jeffrey pine, ponderosa pine, sugar pine and incense cedar. This is also consistent with the National Strategic Plan Goal 5, which calls for improving watershed conditions.

The Need for Lake Fire Project Area Restoration There is a need to restore forest health on the non-wilderness portions of the severely burned Lake Fire project area while providing a safe environment. The fire left a high number of standing dead and dying trees across the landscape and associated roads and trails. Removal of hazardous trees is needed to ensure public safety. The project would plant Jeffrey pine, ponderosa pine, sugar pine and incense cedar that would move the area towards a species mix similar to the historic montane conifer forests typical in the pre-suppression and early-suppression eras. This is consistent with San Bernardino National Forest strategy FH 3 (Forest Plan Part 2, Appendix B, page 131; USDA Forest Service 2005a). There is also a compelling need to revegetate the area to eliminate or minimize soil loss, erosion and adverse sedimentation impacts to hydrologic resources on the burned over lands. The Proposed Action The proposed action has been designed to meet the purpose and need described above to restore the Lake Fire project area after the 2015 fire that covered about 31,000 acres. A substantial amount of fire burned in the San Gorgonio Wilderness. While no restoration would occur within the San Gorgonio Wilderness, hazard trees within the wilderness boundary that could impact trails and adjacent roads would be removed. Public Safety: Hazardous Tree Removal To allow for safe public access into the burned area, the Forest Service is proposing to remove hazard trees to along roads and trails. Due to proximity of roads adjacent to the San Gorgonio Wilderness, approximately seven acres of burn area within the wilderness would have hazard trees removed. The Chief of the Forest Service and the Regional Forester have stressed that the safety of the public and our employees is our central concern. In developed recreation areas and within the transportation corridors, hazard tree management is vital to everyone s safety (Angwin et al. 2012). The project area will be surveyed for hazard trees left after the fire burned through the area. Regional guidelines would be used to determine hazard trees. Trees identified as immediate hazards would be removed throughout the life of the project. Hazard trees standing within a distance of either 150 feet, or 1 to 1 ½ times the height of the tree (Angwin et al 2012), from roads and trails would be removed to mitigate concerns for public safety. All standing dead trees with no green needles that meet the distance criteria would be removed. Trees will be cut using a combination of hand and mechanical falling techniques. Heavy equipment may be used for decking of cut trees along roadsides, as well as chipping of excess slash if necessary. Hazard trees removed would be left as down wood for wildlife habitat, removed through deck sales and/or made available for sale to public fuelwood cutters. Where heavy equipment is used, it would be on existing roads and trails as much as possible. Any use off roads and trails would need approval by the Forest Service. Roads and trails would be rehabilitated as needed after operations are complete. Planting To meet the Forest Plan objective of restoring forest health on the severely burned lands in the project area and move toward the desired condition for the San Gorgonio Place as outlined in the Forest Plan (Forest Plan Part 2, pages 87-88; USDA Forest Service 2005a), the Forest Service proposes to plant seedlings on approximately 2,000 acres of National Forest System lands. Planting is expected to begin in spring of 2017. Various planting units have been identified and are scattered over the project area.

Seedlings to be planted include Jeffrey pine, sugar pine, ponderosa pine, and incense-cedar. These seedlings were requested to be sown at the Regional nursery in Placerville, California from seed stock previously collected in appropriate seed zones. Up to 200 trees per acre would be planted for an ultimate survivorship five years after planting of between 50 and 100 surviving trees per acre. This proposed action is consistent with the desired conditions of the San Gorgonio Place. Forest health and restoration projects such as the proposed Lake Fire Project would remove dead trees, reduce stand density and promote pre-fire suppression era fire return intervals. The proposed reforestation with the species mix as described above would also maintain forest diversity and allow forested areas to subsequently be managed to protect from type conversion to grass, thus providing some level of fire protection for adjacent urban communities, recreation areas, and wildlife habitat (Forest Plan Part 2, pages 87; USDA Forest Service 2005a). Trees would be spaced at a minimum of 15 by 15 foot spacing yielding around 200 trees per acre. In some situations, there would be less than 200 trees planted depending on the site conditions. Spacing of plantings would vary from the designated 15 by 15 spacing to take advantage of acceptable planting spots and would be spaced off existing live conifer seedling/saplings. Seedlings would not be planted within the driplines of existing live trees larger than sapling size. Holes would be dug either with hand tools or mechanical augers directly before planting seedlings 6 to 12 inches deep to accommodate root depth. Plantings would also incorporate microsite considerations and shading when possible. Site preparation would involve clearing a small area of existing vegetation and debris. A roughly 18 by 18 inch area would be cleared around each planting spot. The area would be cleared of competing vegetation by scraping or grubbing out vegetation. Naturally regenerated trees would be retained with planted trees spaced around them. Release treatments, which include hand grubbing or cutting of vegetation a minimum of 24 inches around a planted tree, may occur one or more times after planting to reduce competition from competing vegetation. The areas needing release treatments would depend on the success of planting, level of competition observed from vegetation, and availability of Forest Service resources. No fertilizer or herbicide would be applied with this action. Monitoring of survival would be done one and three years after planting as lined out in Forest Service Manual 2472.03. Planting sites would be accessed by foot traffic, horseback, or vehicles. No new temporary roads would be created; existing roads and trails, where available, would be used to access planting sites. Vehicles would not be used off of designated roads and trails.

Figure 1: Lake Fire Reforestation Vicinity Map