Seismic Analysis Values with Spreadsheet

Similar documents
Seismic Design & Qualification Methods An Interpretation of the IBC 2006 & ASCE 7 Code

7. Seismic Design. 1) Read.

THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS

Special Civil Engineer Examination Seismic Principles Test Plan

IBC 2006 & ASCE 7-05 Structural Provisions. Martin Johnson, SE & Todd Erickson, SE June 14, 2007

Seismically Rated Fans

APPENDIX A - Seismic Terms, Tables and Figures:

Consideration of torsional irregularity in Modal Response Spectrum Analysis

IBC SEISMIC AND WIND LOAD COMPLIANCE FOR NON-STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS. Requirements for Occupancy Category IV, IBC 2003, 2006 & 2009

Trends in the Seismic Design Provisions of U.S. Building Codes

3.5 Tier 1 Analysis Overview Seismic Shear Forces

PEER/CSSC Tall Building Design Case Study Building #1. J. Andrew Fry John Hooper Ron Klemencic Magnusson Klemencic Associates

r clarke 1 INTRODUCTION TO IBC SEISMIC FORCES

SESSION TU4C: The Steps Behind Building Resilience

Table 1. Detailed Comparison of Structural Provisions of 2000 IBC to 1997 NEHRP (continued)

LIGHTLY DAMPED MOMENT RESISTING STEEL FRAMES

sixteen seismic design Earthquake Design Earthquake Design Earthquake Design dynamic vs. static loading hazard types hazard types: ground shaking

Seismic and Geotechnical Data Requirements in the 2010 California Building Code

QUANTIFYING SEISMIC RISK FOR PORTABLE GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AT VANDENBERG AIR FORCE BASE. A Project. presented to

Remarks regarding FEMA 368 seismic analysis guidelines

Design for Department of Defense (DoD) - General Building Requirements

State Requirements for a S.E. to Design Structures

Evaluation of Fixed Base vs. Base Isolated Building Systems

AC R1 # Triangle Parkway Suite 100 Norcross, Ga Phone: Fax: AC R1. September 11, 2012

0306 SEISMIC LOADS GENERAL

Seismic Design of School Buildings in Colorado and other Low to Moderate Hazard Areas: Is the Interna>onal Building Code adequate?

NONBUILDING STRUCTURE DESIGN

SAMPLE SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT

BUILDING INTEGRITY SUMMARY REPORT

Mandatory Wood Frame Soft-story Retrofit Program STRUCTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES

LATERAL LOADS ON BRICK VENEER RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES

EVOLUTION OF UBC AND IBC STATIC LATERAL FORCE PROCEDURE

School of Engineering and Applied Science Building Miami University, Oxford, OH Technical Assignment 3 December 3, 2007

How IBC-2009 seismic and wind loading standards apply to emergency standby power systems

Table 3. Detailed Comparison of Structural Provisions of IRC 2000 and 1997 NEHRP (Continued)

IBC Structural Provisions: A Better Alternative

BUILDING INTEGRITY SUMMARY REPORT

Guide to Weak-Story Tool

SEISMIC ISOLATION STANDARD FOR CONTINUED FUNCTIONALITY. Table C.3-1. Resiliency Criteria Limits for Structure Design Categories

STRUCTURAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS (SEISMIC PROVISIONS) FOR EXISTING BUILDING CONVERTED TO JOINT LIVING AND WORK QUARTERS

Table 4. Detailed Comparison of Structural Provisions of 1997 NEHRP to 1997 UBC (continued)

Basic Project Management

REINFORCED CONCRETE WALL BOUNDARY ELEMENT LONGITUDINAL REINFORCING TERMINATION

ASCE Structural Evaluation Report

DEFLECTION AMPLIFICATION FACTORS FOR DUCTILE BRACED FRAMES

Elements of 2012 IBC / ASCE 7-10 Nonstructural Seismic Provisions: Bridging the Implementation Gap

SEISMIC PROVISIONS OF IBC 2006 AND ASCE 7-05

Progress Report on the Technical Development of the 2014 NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions

Engr. Thaung Htut Aung M. Eng. Asian Institute of Technology Deputy Project Director, AIT Consulting

Executive Summary. Greg Kochalski. JW Marriott, Grand Rapids, MI

Displacement-Based Seismic Analysis of A Mixed Structural System

EVALUATION OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE FACTORS FOR CHEVRON BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACED FRAMES

Response of TBI case study buildings

See original reference (CODE) for full details

Lateral Loads Manual

Statewide Alternate Method January 2015 No Cross-Laminated Timber Provisions

Comparison of Chilean and US Seismic Design Provisions for Timber Structures

ASCE 7 Seismic Performance Basis and Potential Modifications for Design of Low Hazard Nuclear Facilities

A Comparative Study on Seismic Analysis of Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC) with Other Building Codes

Recent Advances in Seismic and Wind Design of Wood Structures &Historic Preservation Examples

CASE STUDY OF A 40 STORY BRBF BUILDING LOCATED IN LOS ANEGELES

Inelastic Analysis of Steel Moment Resisting Frames in Light-Framed Wood Buildings

Available at: Last Modified: December 2012

COMPARATIVE SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF RC FRAME BUILDINGS DESIGNED FOR ASCE 7 AND IS 1893

Seismic Design of Precast Concrete Structures

Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistance of Structures. The Standards Institution of Israel

SE APPRENTICE. Stephen Metz PE, LEED AP. Today s Speakers. Company Overview. Company Overview 10/13/2015. SE Apprentice. Who We Are.

An Introduction to the 2015 NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures

WIND CODE EVALUATION. COLOMBIA Evaluation conducted by Guillermo Santana

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING

Calculation of Wind Loads on Structures according to ASCE 7-10

Session: Ever-Changing Structural Provisions of Our Building Codes

Technical Report #3. Matthew R Peyton

U.S. CODE DEVELOPMENT FOR BUILDINGS WITH ADDED DAMPING

BUILDING INTEGRITY SUMMARY REPORT

Chinmoy Kolay Research Engineer

PEER Tall Building Seismic Design Guidelines

FEMA 356 Life Safety Building Performance Evaluation & PML Analysis

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF CONCRETE TILT-UP BUILDINGS: CURRENT WALL-TO-SLAB CONNECTIONS

Seismic assessment of an existing hospital

4.2 Tier 2 Analysis General Analysis Procedures for LSP & LDP

EARTHQUAKE INDUCED AMPLIFIED LOADS IN STEEL INVERTED V- TYPE CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE SEISMIC PROVISIONS BETWEEN IRAQI SEISMIC CODES 2014 AND 1997 FOR KURDISTAN REGION/IRAQ

OVERVIEW OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING STANDARDS

Lateral load basics Code acceptance of Standard. Standard Overview 2008 Wind & Seismic Standard. Wind. Wind Load Path. IBC Section 1604.

HYBRID MOMENT RESISTING STEEL FRAMES

OF THREE NEW BUILDINGS BEING CONSTRUCTED TO REPLACE THE EXISTING COMPLEX. THE FLOOR SYSTEM OF GEORGE READ HALL IS A HAMBRO COMPOSITE SYSTEM

DESIGN PERFORMANCE LEVELS

Nonstructural Components

North Shore at Canton Baltimore, MD Beau Menard Technical Report 1

State of the Art Application of Seismic Isolation to Ancient Heritage Cathedrals in Haiti

Technical Report #1. Matthew R Peyton

A STRUCTURAL RESPONSE PREDICTION ENGINE TO SUPPORT ADVANCED SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT

Performance-Based Plastic Design Method

Seismic Performance Evaluation of an Existing Precast Concrete Shear Wall Building

Question 8 of 55. y 24' 45 kips. 30 kips. 39 kips. 15 kips x 14' 26 kips 14' 13 kips 14' 20' Practice Exam II 77

Dihong Shao, S.E. Principal Coffman Engineers, Inc. Seattle, Washington. Brian Walkenhauer, S.E. Engineer Coffman Engineers, Inc. Seattle, Washington

Seismic Design of Building Structures

BUILDING INTEGRITY SUMMARY REPORT

Transcription:

PDHonline Course S232 (2 PDH) Seismic Analysis Values with Spreadsheet Instructor: John W. Andrew, PE 2012 PDH Online PDH Center 5272 Meadow Estates Drive Fairfax, VA 22030-6658 Phone & Fax: 703-988-0088 www.pdhonline.org www.pdhcenter.com An Approved Continuing Education Provider

Seismic Analysis Values with Spreadsheet John W. Andrew, PE INTRODUCTION The seismic response coefficient, C s, is used to determine the design seismic base shear using the equivalent lateral force procedure in accordance with the provisions of Section 12.8. The design base shear is the product of the seismic design coefficient, C s, and the effective seismic weight of the structure, W. The SDC classification is important in the seismic design of a building. If a building is classified as category A, then the building may be designed in accordance with Section 11.7 only. Each subsequent letter classification (B through F) results in an increase in seismic design requirements. This includes permissible structural systems, height limits, permissible analysis procedures, detailing requirements and requirements for nonstructural components. The earthquake provisions of ASCE 7-05 chapters 11-13 and 15-23 are based on the 2003 NEHRP Provisions. Calculation of the seismic design coefficient, C S, is based on the spectral response accelerations, seismic importance factor, fundamental period of the building, long-period transition period and response modification factor. These factors are determined using the occupancy category, site class and building period coefficients. OCCUPANCY CATEGORY The occupancy category is determined by the classifications described in Table 1-1. Category I is assigned to buildings that represent a low hazard to human life in the event of failure. Category II is assigned to most buildings - it is assigned to buildings not otherwise classified as category I, III or IV. Category III is assigned to buildings with large numbers of people, such as buildings where more than 300 people congregate in one area, schools with more than 250 students, buildings with an occupant load exceeding 5,000, nonessential utility facilities and jails and detention facilities. Category IV is assigned to essential facilities, such as hospitals, fire stations, police stations, aviation control towers, buildings containing highly toxic materials and public utility facilities required in an emergency. SEISMIC IMPORTANCE FACTOR The seismic importance factor (I) is a modification of the seismic base shear to reflect the relative importance assigned to the building occupancy during and following an earthquake. The importance factor is determined using Table 11.5-1. For buildings assigned to Occupancy Category I or II, I = 1.0. For buildings assigned to Occupancy Category III, I=1.25. For buildings assigned to Occupancy Category IV, I = 1.5. John W. Andrew Page 2 of 7

RESPONSE MODIFICATION FACTOR The response modification coefficient (R) represents the ability of the structure to resist the design seismic loading without failure. It also represents the reduction in the design seismic loading resulting from the perceived relative ductility of the structural system. The response modification coefficient is determined using Table 12.2-1. SITE CLASS The soil at the building site must be classified as Site Class A, B, C, D, E or F in accordance with the definitions in Table 20.3-1. When the soil properties are not known in sufficient detail to determine the site class, Site Class D shall be used, unless the building official determines that Site Class E or F soil is present at the site. SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATIONS AND SITE COEFFICIENTS The mapped maximum considered earthquake (MCE) spectral response accelerations at short periods (S s ) and at 1-second period (S 1 ) can be determined from Figures 22-1 through 22-14. The acceleration-based site coefficient at 0.3 second period (F a ) can be determined from Table 11.4-1. The acceleration-based site coefficient at 1.0 second period (F v ) can be determined from Table 11.4-2. The values for S s, S 1, F a and F v are also available on the USGS website at http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/hazmaps/design. On the home page of the USGS web site, click on Java Ground Motion Parameter Calculator. In the File Download Dialog Box, click on Open to download the software. Click on Okay. Click on Lat/Lon tab to enter building location using latitude and longitude or Zip Code to enter building location using the postal zip code. After entering the latitude and longitude or the zip code, click on Calculate Ss & S 1. The values for S s and S 1 for Site Class B will be displayed. Click on Calculate S M & S D Values. On the Set Site Class pull down menu, select the site class for the building location and click OK. The values for F a and F v will be displayed, as well as the values for S MS, S M1, S DS and S D1. The output may be printed by clicking on Print on the File pull down menu. BUILDING PERIOD COEFFICIENTS The building period coefficients C t and x vary with the structure type and are determined from Table 12.8-2. h n is the height in feet above the base to the highest level of the building. SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATIONS ADJUSTED FOR SITE CLASS EFFECTS S MS is the maximum considered earthquake, 5% damped, spectral response acceleration at short periods adjusted for site class effects as defined in Section 11.4.3. S MS = F a S s. John W. Andrew Page 3 of 7

S M1 is the maximum considered earthquake, 5% damped, spectral response acceleration at a period of 1-sec adjusted for site class effects as defined in Section 11.4.3. S M1 = F v S 1. S DS is the design, 5% damped, spectral response acceleration at short periods as defined in Section 11.4.4. S DS = (2/3) S MS S D1 is the design, 5% damped, spectral response acceleration at a period of 1 sec as defined in Section 9.4.1.2. S D1 = (2/3) S M1 FUNDAMENTAL PERIOD OF BUILDING T a is the approximate fundamental period of the building as determined by Section 12.8.2.1. T a = C t (h n ) x. SEISMIC RESPONSE COEFFICIENT C s is the seismic response coefficient for the building as determined by Section 12.8.1.1. S DS I C s = R except that the seismic design coefficient need not be greater than S D1 I R T S D1 T L I R T 2 for T <= T L or for T > T L and shall not be less than 0.01 or (.5) S 1 I less than R if S 1 >= 60 %g. where T L is the long-period transition period as shown in Figures 22-15 through 22-20. John W. Andrew Page 4 of 7

SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY The seismic design category (SDC) is determined by Table 11.6-1 and Table 11.6-2. Based on the values of S DS and S D1 and the Occupancy Caregory, the seismic design category is assigned as the more severe SDC as determined by the two tables. However, an exception allows only Table 11.6-1 to be used if the provisions stated in Paragraph 11.6 apply. EXAMPLE PROBLEM Determine the seismic design coefficient, C S, and the seismic design category (SDC) for a one-story health care facility with a capacity of 60 resident patients, but without surgery or emergency treatment facilities, to be built in Atlanta, Georgia. The roof structure will be wood trusses. The supporting walls will be wood studs. The lateral force resisting system will be a light-framed wall system using flat strap bracing. The height of the structure will be 18 feet. The soil at the project site has been classified as site class D. The latitude at the building site is 33.9 degrees and the longitude is 84.3 degrees. The approximate fundamental period of the structure is less than 0.8T S, the fundamental period of the structure used to calculate the story drift is less than T s and the diaphragm is rigid. From Table 1-1, the occupancy classification was is category III. From Table 11.5-1, for Occupancy Category III, the seismic importance factor, I, is 1.25. From Table 12.2-1, the response modification factor, R = 4 From the USGS web site, the spectral response accelerations and acceleration-based site coefficients are as follows: S s = 23.9 %g S 1 = 8.8 %g F a = 1.60 F v = 2.40 From Table 12.8-2, for structure type all other structural systems, the building period coefficients are as follows: C t = 0.02 x = 0.75 The height to the highest level of the building, h n = 18 feet. John W. Andrew Page 5 of 7

From Figure 22-15, T L = 12 sec S MS = F a S S S MS = (1.60) (.239) =.382 S M1 = F v S 1 S M1 = (2.40) (.088) =.211 S DS = (2/3) S MS S DS = (2/3) (.382) =.255 S D1 = (2/3) S M1 S D1 = (2/3) (.211) =.141 C S = S DS I / R C S = (.255) (1.25) / 4 =.080 T = C T (h n ) 0.75 T = (.02) (18.00) 0.75 =.175 sec For T <= T L, C S need not exceed (.141) (1.25) / 4 /.175 =.252 C S shall not be less than.010 C S =.080 The example problem above is entered in the spreadsheet. The Excel spreadsheet has the appropriate formulas embedded and provides references to applicable references for entries required. The formulas and calculated results are in protected cells so that they may not be inadvertently changed. Information provided by the user is entered into yellow unprotected cells. Calculation results are provided in blue colored cells. With the data entered in the appropriate cells, the seismic design coefficient, C s = 0.080. Because Equation 12.8-2 was used to determine C s and the approximate fundamental period of the structure is less than 0.8T S, the fundamental period of the structure used to calculate the story drift is less than T s and the diaphragm is rigid, Table 11.6-1 only may be used to determine the seismic design category. For a value of S DS equal to 0.255 in Occupancy Category III, the building is assigned to Seismic Design Category B. John W. Andrew Page 6 of 7

REFERENCES 1. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE Standard ASCE/SEI 7-05), American Society of Civil Engineers, 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191. 2. 2006 IBC Handbook Structural Provisions, International Code Council, 4051 Flossmoor Rd., Country Club Hills, IL 60478. John W. Andrew Page 7 of 7