Public Sewer and Water Service

Similar documents
FHWA Pavement Condition Performance Measures

Greater CT Ozone "Moderate" Nonattainment Area (emissions in tons per day) RESULTS BUDGET DIFFERENCE

241 Main Street / Hartford / Connecticut / Phone (860) / Fax (860)

The Metropolitan District. Stormwater & I/I Reduction Presentation March 16, 2017

ADDENDUM #1: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: CRCOG Regional GIS Portal and Parcel Viewer

SSES Implementation and SSES Pilot Study Program Large-Scale Rehabilitation in Multiple Towns

Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Request for Proposals ADDENDUM #1 September 29, 2017

The South Hartford Conveyance and Storage Tunnel

Lyle agreed and noted that often times it is a matter of scaling up initiatives that are already working.

Tighe&Bond. rates.tighebond.com

OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY PUBLIC NOTICE. June 24, 2010 AVAILABILITY OF DRAFT BACTERIA TMDL FOR THE BIRD CREEK AREA WATERSHED

Sanitary Sewer Rates Now and in the Future

The Metropolitan District. Water Bureau Presentation May 18, 2016

OVERVIEW CAPACITY & CONDITION

Fact Sheet. Chesapeake Bay Water Quality

WASTEWATER WASTEWATER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Capital Facilities Element

RURAL RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL RESIDENTIAL ALL COMMUNITIES

OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY PUBLIC NOTICE. January 24, 2008 AVAILABILITY OF DRAFT BACTERIA TMDL FOR THE NEOSHO RIVER BASIN

Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District Conveyance and Treatment System. MACRO made available by

Hartford WPCF Master Plan Clean Water Project. Executive Summary. February 2010

DIVERSIFIED RURAL COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE DIVERSIFIED RURAL ALL COMMUNITIES

The Metropolitan District Status of LTCP Update. January 9, 2017

City of Lansing s Triple Bottom Line Approach to Wet Weather Control Planning

CHAPTER SEVEN: UTILITIES

Integrated Planning for Meeting Clean Water Act Requirements

Infrastructure Element

Paying for Stormwater Management: Stormwater Service Charge Proposal OCTOBER 9, 2014

INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT Goal, Objectives and Policies

CAPITOL REGION TRANSPORTATION PLAN

EPA Consent Decree Annual Informational Meeting Integrated Plan/Regional Wet Weather Management Plan. January 22, 2019

Rulemaking Hearing Rules of the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation State Revolving Fund Loan Program

Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems

SUBURBAN EDGE COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE ALL COMMUNITIES SUBURBAN EDGE

RULES OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION WATER RESOURCES DIVISION CHAPTER PRIORITY RANKING SYSTEM

RURAL CENTER COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL CENTER ALL COMMUNITIES

INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT

UPDATE. Funding Decentralized Wastewater Systems Using the Clean Water State Revolving Fund ACTIVITY

Promote fiscally responsible asset management of existing and proposed new infrastructure.

LIMITED ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District, Southerly Electrical Infrastructure Improvements SEII/1401A

LICK RUN WATERSHED MASTER PLAN. Community Design Workshop #1 August 11, 2011

Framework for Water Resilience in Long Island. Samudyatha Mysore Subbarama

Goals, Objectives, and Policies Infrastructure Element Introduction

Infrastructure. 7.1 Overview Goals, Objectives, and Policies A. Stormwater Management B. Sanitary Sewer System...

Wastewater Treatment Works... The Basics

Rocky Hill. Challenges

PUBLIC UTILITIES. Water Service

The MDC s South Hartford Conveyance and Storage Tunnel

Sewer Facilities 102. Hampstead Sewer Service Area. Carroll County Water & Sewer Master Plan. Current Conditions

EXHIBIT # ATTACHMENT #

EXHIBIT # ATTACHMENT #

SUSTAINABLE MUNICIPAL WATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

URBAN CENTER COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE ALL COMMUNITIES URBAN CENTER

Chapter 1. Introduction

6. Pollutant Sources in

Storm Water Utility Improvements

Which Data Are Important And Why? Barry Tonning Tetra Tech

CHAPTER 4 WATERSHED PLAN GOALS & OBJECTIVES

Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District PRIVATE INFILTRATION and INFLOW REDUCTION PROGRAM

Tunnel Works. How we got here - Fort Wayne s Consent Decree. Tunnel Works Program Frequently Asked Questions

NJ Future CSO Permittee Meeting

Wastewater Treatment Systems, Wastewater Issues and Permits

Broome County Comprehensive Plan Building Our Future. Water Resources

CHAPTER SEVEN: UTILITIES

Table 5-1: Availability of Public Sanitary Sewer. Are plans underway to provide Public Sewer?

2014 Adopted. Capital Improvement

Municipal Service Review

Chapter 8: Water Supply & Sanitary Systems

Jacksonville City Council Candidate Survey 2019

CHAPTER SEVEN: UTILITIES

Municipal Stormwater Management Planning

Community Development Committee Meeting date: January 16, 2006

Clean Energy Finance and Investment Authority. C-PACE: A financing tool for CHP in commercial & industrial buildings

Surface Water Management

What is a stormwater utility fee?

Wastewater Management in Metro Vancouver. Margaret Morales 14 March 2011 PLAN 597

Water Quality, Public Works and Nitrate Contamination

The Maine Drain: Stormwater Management Strategies and Solutions June 12, Portland s Approach. Michael Bobinsky, Director of Public Services

Guidance for Residential Underground Fuel Tank Releases CT Department of Environmental Protection Underground Storage Tank Program Fact Sheet

8/13/18. County Environmental Compliance. Counties have a Key Role in Environmental Planning and Compliance. How Will Your Community Grow?

Stafford Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 384

City of Greater Sudbury Infrastructure Background Study APPENDIX A.1. Guideline for Sewage and Water Services

WASHINGTON SUBURBAN SANITARY COMMISSION BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES ASSOCIATED WITH WSSC S CONSENT DECREE FOR SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOW

The Business of Clean Water. Bringing private sector leadership to water quality in Baltimore

SESWA. Source Control Measures to Improve Water Quality

Synergy: Addressing Combined Sewer Overflows and Nitrogen

Why Camden s environment is important to everyone in the Delaware Watershed...

CHAPTER 2 WASTEWATER REGULATORY ISSUES

CHAPTER 6 SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT

Chapter 5: Public Services, Facilities, and Utilities Element

Resilience Lessons from Community Water System Experience with Past Storms

Water Quality Stewardship Plan (WaQSP)

PHASE 1 OF THE CONSENT DECREE/ WET WEATHER IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS THROUGH 2017

Chapter 8: Water Supply & Sanitary Systems

Executive Summary. Introduction

DC STORMWATER PLAN CONSOLIDATED TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TDML) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Municipal Service Review

ROCKY LEDGE PUBLIC WATER PROGRAM QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS. Working Document, Last Updated August 24, 2017

Water, Wastewater and Stormwater 2017 Budget 2018 Plan

CONSUMER CONFIDENCE REPORT

Transcription:

Vibrant. Green. Connected. Competitive. Public Sewer and Water Service Statement of Purpose Ensuring that all of the region s residents have an adequate and consistently high quality water supply is of utmost importance. The Capitol Region has a mix of private and public water supplies, individual septic systems and large public sewer systems. The existence and safety of wastewater management systems is necessary to maintain the health of not only the region s population, but its environment as well. The existing and planned water and sewer infrastructure is also a key component to guiding the growth and development of the region. 99

REGIONAL PLAN of CONSERVATION and DEVELOPMENT Current Conditions Though on a region-wide basis, the great majority of residents are served by both public water and sewer systems, the town-to-town range is wide. While rural towns such as Andover and Hebron rely almost entirely on private wells and septic systems, the urbanized areas of Hartford and East Hartford have almost complete service coverage. To ensure its continued service to the region, the Metropolitan District (MDC) is currently replacing its infrastructure. This project will take 15 years to complete. Table 9.1 Percent of Regional Land Area Covered by Public Water and Sewer Service Year Water Sewer 1978 20.2% 14.8% 1990 21.5% 19.9% 1995 22.7% 20.3% 2005 22.7% 2010 27.3% Sources: CRCOG and State of Connecticut databases While public utilities serve approximately threequarters of the housing units in the region, the percentage of land area served by water and sewer lines is much lower. As Table 9.1 indicates, about a quarter of the region s land area lies within reach of public water and sewer utilities. The relatively high housing unit density in and surrounding Hartford makes such public service efficient and necessary. Between 1980 and 2010, there was a nearly 28 percent increase in housing units in the Capitol Region. However, this growth did not occur evenly throughout the region. Growth in housing units in the region s rural towns (which have less extensive water and sewer service areas) was especially robust over the past three decades, and nearly doubled the amount of housing in some communities. Housing unit growth in the region s rural towns as a group exceeded 65 percent, and growth in suburban towns increased by 54 percent. Over this same time, growth in the fully suburban towns increased by only 23 percent while Hartford lost 6 percent of its housing units. Comparing the growth of the area served by public water and sewer between 1978 and 2010 to the region s housing unit growth between 1980 and 2010, indicates that most new development is occurring away from public water and sewer lines. 100 Capitol Region Council of Governments

Vibrant. Green. Connected. Competitive. Public Water Service Regulation of existing and future public water supply in the Capitol Region is handled largely by the Connecticut Department of Public Health (DPH) in conjunction with the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection s Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA). Planning for public water supply systems is administered through DPH under the Water Utility Coordinating Committee (WUCC) planning process. Most Capitol Region communities belong to the Upper Connecticut WUCC. Marlborough and Hebron are in the Southeast WUCC and Andover, Bolton, Tolland and Stafford are assigned to the Northeast WUCC which has not yet convened. The DPH requires each water utility company to file plans of development with five, twenty and fiftyyear projections. Aside from the continued effort for improving drinking water quality, the DPH is working with rural towns and water utility companies to encourage the consolidation of small residential and commercial public systems into larger community systems. This would improve regulation of the water supply quantity as well as quality and also help to guide growth. Each WUCC, and hence the region, like much of the state, is divided up into exclusive service areas (ESAs). Each ESA is the domain of a single water utility provider, which is responsible for existing and future water customers in that area. The water provider is obligated to extend water service to any customer in their ESA who requests it. This service extension can be accomplished either by tying the new customer in with existing water infrastructure or by developing a new local public water supply. However, the complete cost of extending service is often borne by the consumer. In the Capitol Region, Stafford, Tolland, Andover and Bolton are the only towns currently unassigned to an ESA, although the DPH is working toward incorporation of these towns into ESAs. 101

REGIONAL PLAN of CONSERVATION and DEVELOPMENT Public Sewer Service Unlike public water service, public sewer systems do not have exclusive service areas. In most cases where the region s towns have public sewer lines, these systems are managed by a utility district such as the MDC or by the towns themselves. Sewer lines are installed by public works staff and a wastewater treatment facility is locally or regionally controlled. Where density does not require public sewers, private septic systems are generally the preferred method for treating wastewater. As 65 percent of the region s residentially zoned area requires one-acre minimum lot size or larger, private septic systems are very common. Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) systems also exist in the region. While these systems use two pipes to separate sewage and storm water, some of these pipes are over 100 years old with cracks allowing groundwater to infiltrate. During heavy storms, these pipes are also prone to overflowing into rivers and streams. Private septic systems are sometimes neglected and difficult to regulate. As a result, their failure can cause significant local pollution problems. Both public and private sewage treatment systems may create environmental problems. Two of the region s largest municipalities, Hartford and Enfield, still have Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) systems, which convey stormwater and sewage in the same pipe system. During intense rainstorms, CSOs can dump raw sewage into the Connecticut River. 102 Capitol Region Council of Governments

Vibrant. Green. Connected. Competitive. MDC Clean Water Project Several years ago, the MDC began a 15 year, multiphase Clean Water Project in response to an U.S. EPA sanitary sewer overflow Federal consent decree and a Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection combined sewer overflow consent order to achieve the Federal Clean Water Act goals by 2021. The Clean Water Project will work toward combined sewer overflow reduction as well as sanitary sewer overflow elimination and nitrogen removal. Phase I CSO projects target six areas in Hartford to relieve the problems of combined sewage overflow and to channel sewage to an upgraded Hartford Water Pollution Control Facility (WPCF). SSO reduction will eliminate structural SSOs in Wethersfield, West Hartford, Windsor, Rocky Hill and Newington. Nitrogen removal will require modifications and additions to the WPCFs in Hartford, and Rocky Hill as well as the wastewater collection and sanitary pumping facilities that convey water to these WPCFs. The cost of the entire project is $2.1 billion, of which $800 million has already been approved and committed for Phase I. An additional $800 million referendum to fund Phase II work passed in November 2012. In combination, these projects will ultimately help to eliminate sewage overflows to area waterways during an average year, thus significantly improving the region s water quality. 103

REGIONAL PLAN of CONSERVATION and DEVELOPMENT GOALS & POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS A. Ensure an Adequate and High Quality Water Supply As was detailed in the Watersheds and Water Quality section of the Plan, an ample and clean water supply is crucial to the health and vitality of the region. Because the region s population is served by a broad spectrum of drinking water systems, a wide range of tools must be employed to regulate and ensure the quality of that water for everyone. Natural disasters such as hurricanes and flooding can create public health issues if public water supplies and wells become contaminated. It is important that public water suppliers and well owners are prepared for loss of power, contamination and other adverse effects of natural disasters on the water supply. Policy Recommendations 1. Work with the Connecticut Department of Public Health (DPH) and the towns of Tolland, Stafford, Andover and Bolton to develop a partnership with water service providers or encourage their assignment to an Exclusive Service Area (ESA). 2. Encourage the region s towns to cooperate with the DPH in consolidating older, private water systems, particularly in town centers or higherdensity areas. 3. Support education and other efforts to promote water conservation and reduction of nonpoint source pollution. 4. Continue efforts to identify and protect highyield aquifer areas and water supply watershed areas to ensure a stable and clean water supply. 5. Work with local, state, and federal officials to ensure that local water pollution control facilities are operating at a high standard of efficiency. 6. Encourage the region s towns and water utilities to evaluate their vulnerabilities and develop hazard mitigation strategies to prepare for potential contamination, loss of power, and other disruptions to our water supply. B. Continue Reduction of Environmental Impacts of Sewage Discharge As stated above, both public and private sewage systems can potentially create environmental problems. Whether a city Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) system or Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) system is overloaded or a private septic system fails, the result is raw sewage deposited into the region s watersheds. High levels of nitrogen and coliform bacteria can be toxic to the wildlife of the receiving waters, and can potentially contaminate downstream drinking water supplies. Policy Recommendations 1. Support MDC in obtaining the goals and objectives of its Clean Water Project. 2. Support efforts to upgrade local wastewater treatment facilities. 3. Work with local, state, and federal officials to upgrade old CSO and SSO systems. 4. Educate local officials and residents about the importance of private septic system maintenance. 5. Encourage the region s towns and wastewater utilities to evaluate their vulnerabilities and develop hazard mitigation strategies to prepare for potential flooding of facilities, loss of power, and other disruptions to our wastewater treatment systems. 104 Capitol Region Council of Governments

Vibrant. Green. Connected. Competitive. C. Use Existing Water and Sewer Infrastructure to Guide Future Growth In areas of high population density, as well as in heavy commercial or industrial areas, public water and sewer systems are necessities. The 50,000 households in Hartford simply could not survive with individual wells and septic systems. Conversely, it would be logistically and economically burdensome to extend sewer and water lines out to the remote subdivisions of Andover or Tolland unless warranted for pollution control. Just as the growth patterns in the region have led to decisions about the extension of these utilities, the presence or absence of these utilities can guide future regional growth patterns. Policy Recommendations 1. Work with local officials and utility providers to encourage the development of an infrastructure system that meets desired local and regional growth patterns. 2. Encourage communication between town departments to ensure that planning efforts align with both pipeline and plant capacity. 3. Encourage towns to understand and plan for limits on phosphorous discharge at plants that will limit future growth. 4. Encourage infill development in areas already served by sewer and water lines. 5. Support efforts to redevelop and revitalize older areas within existing water and sewer service areas. 6. Discourage the joint extension of sewer and water service into unserved rural areas, except for extensions scaled to serve areas planned for significant commercial or industrial development. 7. Encourage municipalities to adopt a service area map for public sewer and water, and then designate the balance of town lands as on-site management areas. 8. Work with developers and town officials to consider smaller, on-site wastewater treatment systems that would allow for cluster or village residential development at selected locations not served by public utilities. 9. Encourage streamlining the permitting process at DEEP and DPH so as not to discourage strategic development investment. 10. Support clarifying and streamlining the local and state permitting procedures to facilitate the increased use of small community on-site wastewater treatment systems. D. Balance Water Supply and Ecosystem Considerations Several state agencies, including the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, Department of Public Health, and Office of Policy and Management, are responsible for permitting water companies to expand water utility service to businesses or residences. These permits can include the expansion or development of well fields, consolidation of small, formerly privately held water supplies, or the diversion of surface water from rivers and streams. Crucial goals of this process are sustaining both an adequate water supply and the health of the ecosystem from which the water is to be taken. Policy Recommendations 1. Support the efforts of State of Connecticut regulatory agencies to establish clear and scientifically valid criteria for permitting the expansion of water service. 2. Encourage research to determine minimum instream flow levels to support healthy stream and river ecosystems and prevent over diversion for water supply purposes. 3. Oppose interbasin diversion of surface and ground water, unless demonstrated to be the most reasonable and feasible alternative for meeting critical need(s) which are supported through state and regional plans. 105

R EG I O N A L P L A N o f CO N S ER VAT I O N a n d D E V ELO PM EN T Map 9.1. Sewer and Water Service Areas Suffield Granby East Granby Somers Enfield Windsor Locks Ellington East Windsor Canton Tolland Windsor Simsbury Bloomfield Vernon South Windsor Sewer Service Only Avon West Hartford Hartford East Hartford Manchester Water Service Only Bolton Water and Sewer Service Andover Farmington Wethersfield Newington Hebron Marlborough N 0 3 C a p i to l Re g i o n C o u n c i l o f G o v e r n m e nt s 6 Water and Future Sewer Service Future Sewer Service Area Glastonbury Rocky Hill 106 Stafford 12 Miles Sources CRCOG Internal GIS Database and draft Conservation and Development Policies: A Plan for Connecticut 2013-2018, Office of Policy and Management Notes: Sewer Service may be public or private Water Service Data circa 2005 Sewer Service Data as of 2010