Case No COMP/M UPS / Menlo. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 10/12/2004

Similar documents
Case No COMP/M TNT FORWARDING HOLDING / WILSON LOGISTICS. REGULATION (EEC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

COMP/M STORA ENSO / SCHNEIDERSÖHNE PAPIER

Case No COMP/M INEOS / LANXESS' ENGINEERING THERMOPLASTIC RESINS BUSINESS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M LUFTHANSA CARGO / AIR FRANCE FINANCE / BRITISH AIRWAYS / GLOBAL FREIGHT EXCHANGE / JV

Case No COMP/M RICOH / IKON. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/10/2008

Case No COMP/M PAI / CHR. HANSEN. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/07/2005

Case No COMP/M COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION / BUSINESS SYSTEMS. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M SHELL / BEB. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 20/11/2003

Case No COMP/M BOEING / AVIALL. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/08/2006

Case No COMP/M CVC / DSI. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 25/09/2007

Case No COMP/M NTN / SNR. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 27/03/2007

COMP/M BP / ASSOCIATED BRITISH FOODS / JV

Case No COMP/M E.ON / MIDLANDS. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 16/12/2003

Case No COMP/M RICOH / DANKA. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 08/12/2006

Case No COMP/M MUBADALA / ROLLS ROYCE / JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 16/02/2009

Case M PGA / MSA. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32015M7747

COMP/M SITA SVERIGE AB / SYDKRAFT ECOPLUS

Case No COMP/M ADM / PURA. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 03/04/2003

Case No COMP/M CVC / BOCCHI / DE WEIDE BLIK. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 30/05/2006

Case No COMP/M FAURECIA/ PLASTAL. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/03/2010

Case No COMP/M ERAMET / TINFOS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 03/07/2008

Case No COMP/M MARFRIG ALIMENTOS/ SEARA. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/12/2009

Case No COMP/M TPG ADVISORS III / GOLDMAN SACHS / BAIN CAPITAL INVESTORS / BURGER KING. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M BAIN CAPITAL / DOR CHEMICAL / TRESPAPHAN. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

COMP/M TRITON III HOLDING 6/ WITTUR GROUP

Case No COMP/M GOLDMAN SACHS / CINVEN / AHLSELL. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 06/01/2006

Case No COMP/M CORPORATION / AZLAN GROUP. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/03/2003

Case No COMP/M APW / GMG / EMAP. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 07/03/2008

Case No COMP/M S&B / HALLIBURTON / CEBO JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/04/2007

Case No COMP/M ATOS ORIGIN / BANKSYS / BCC. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/09/2006

Case No COMP/M SONAE INDUSTRIA / TARKETT / JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 12/06/2006

Case No COMP/M WPP / CORDIANT. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 25/07/2003

Case No COMP/M BUNGE / CEREOL. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 20/09/2002

Case No COMP/M MEXICHEM/ VESTOLIT

Case No COMP/M MERCK/ MILLIPORE. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 07/07/2010

Case No COMP/M REWE / DELVITA. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 25/04/2007

Case No IV/M DHL / DEUTSCHE POST. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 26/06/1998

Case No COMP/M IBM / ILOG. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 10/11/2008

Case No M MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES / SIEMENS / METAL TECHNOLOGIES JV

Case No COMP/M CRH / CEMENTBOUW. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/09/2003

Case No COMP/M NIPPON SHEET GLAS / PILKINGTON. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 07/06/2006

Case No COMP/M BP / NOVA CHEMICALS / JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 01/07/2005

Case No IV/M CHS / VOBIS. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 21/08/1998

COMP/M GENERAL MILLS / PILLSBURY / DIAGEO

Case No COMP/M PAI PARTNERS/ INDUSTRIAL PARTS HOLDING

Case No COMP/JV.45 - * BERTELSMANN / KOOPERATIVA FÖRBUNDET / BOL NORDIC. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M COMPAGNIE DE SAINT-GOBAIN / MEYER INTERNATIONAL. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M EDP / HIDROELECTRICA DEL CANTABRICO. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No IV/M SAMSUNG / AST. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 26/05/1997

&DVH 1R,90 %8+50$11 &25325$7( (;35(66 5(*8/$7,21((&1R 0(5*(5352&('85( Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 08/09/1999

Case No COMP/M SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC / MGE - UPS. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 05/02/2004

Case No COMP/M SAAB / WM-DATA AB / SAAB CARAN JV. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 06/12/2001

Case No COMP/M SMITH & NEPHEW / CENTERPULSE. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 27/05/2003

Case No COMP/M SAINT GOBAIN / DAHL. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 28/04/2004

Case No COMP/M KOCH / KOSA. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 12/11/2001

Case No COMP/M SCHNEIDER / THOMSON MULTIMEDIA / JV. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M AVNET/ BELL MICRO. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 02/07/2010

Case No COMP/M ALCAN / FLEXPACK. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/02/2003

Case No COMP/M ORACLE / BEA. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/04/2008

Case No COMP/M ASTRIUM HOLDING/ VIZADA GROUP. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 30/11/2011

Case No COMP/M EDF / SEEBOARD. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 25/07/2002

Case No IV/M HAVAS ADVERTISING / MEDIA PLANNING. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 10/06/1999

Case No COMP/M JOHN WOOD GROUP/ SIEMENS/ JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/04/2014

Case No COMP/M SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC/ INVENSYS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/11/2013

Case No COMP/M PEPSICO/ THE PEPSICO BOTTLING GROUP. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M SONEPAR / HAGEMEYER. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 08/02/2008

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32017M8640

Case No COMP/M BOEING / LOCKHEED MARTIN / UNITED LAUNCH ALLIANCE JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/18/065 RHENUS / AVANT AIR AND SEA

Case No COMP/M AUTOLOGIC / TNT / WALLENIUS / CAT JV. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

&DVH 1R,90 '(876&+( 3267 $6* 5(*8/$7,21((&1R 0(5*(5352&('85( Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 08/07/1999

Case No COMP/M.6191 Birla/ Columbian Chemicals

COMP/M GENERAL MOTORS/ DELPHI CORPORATION

Case No COMP/M OTTO VERSAND / SABRE / TRAVELOCITY JV. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M COMPAGNIE DE SAINT-GOBAIN / RAAB KARCHER. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No M PONTMEYER / DBS

Case No COMP/M EATON / MOELLER. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 01/04/2008

Case No COMP/M STX/ Aker Yards

Case No COMP/M.4276 AHOLD / KONMAR. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 4 (4) Date: 02/08/2006

Case No IV/M FUJITSU / AMDAHL. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 008/09/1997

Case No COMP/M ALCOA / BRITISH ALUMINIUM. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 27/10/2000

Case No IV/M DANA / ECHLIN. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 06/07/1998

Case No IV/M ICI / TIOXIDE. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date:

Case No COMP/M CANON/ IRIS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 22(3) Date:

Case No IV/M EDS / LUFTHANSA. REGULATION (EEC)No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 11/05/1995

Case No COMP/M AMADEUS / GGL / JV. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 21/05/2002

Case No IV/M MINORCO / TILCON. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 22/12/1995

Case No IV/M Thomson / CSF / Finmeccanica / Elettronica. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case M LINAMAR / MONTUPET. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 10/12/2015

Case No IV/M JOHNSON CONTROLS / BECKER. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/06/1998

Case No IV/M VIVENDI / US FILTERS. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/04/1999

Case No IV/M GEC / GPTH. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 27/07/1998

Case No COMP/M SIME DARBY/ NEW BRITAIN PALM OIL

Case No IV/M TOYOTA / DAIHATSU. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 06/11/1998

Case No COMP/M HEWLETT-PACKARD/ 3COM. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 12/02/2010

Case No COMP/M GS/ TPG/ ONTEX. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 30/09/2010

Case No IV/M GKN / Brambles / Leto Recycling. REGULATION (EEC)No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 7/6/ 1994

Case No COMP/M DOW / ENICHEM POLYURETHANE. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 06/04/2001

Case No IV/M CGP / GEC ALSTHOM / KPR / KONE CORPORATION. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No IV/M KNP BT / BUNZL / WILHELM SEILER. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 14/02/1997

Transcription:

EN Case No COMP/M.3603 - UPS / Menlo Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 10/12/2004 In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3603 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 10/12/2004 SG-Greffe(2004) D/205727 In the published version of this decision, some information has been omitted pursuant to Article 17(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets and other confidential information. The omissions are shown thus [ ]. Where possible the information omitted has been replaced by ranges of figures or a general description. MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION PUBLIC VERSION To the notifying party Dear Sir/Madam, Subject: Case No COMP/M.3603 UPS / Menlo Notification of 09/11/2004 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation No 139/2004 1 1. On 09/11/04, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertaking United Parcel Service Inc. ( UPS, USA) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Menlo Worldwide Forwarding Inc. ( MWF, USA) by way of purchase of shares. 2. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 and does not raise serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. 1 OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1. Commission européenne, B-1049 Bruxelles / Europese Commissie, B-1049 Brussel - Belgium. Telephone: (32-2) 299 11 11.

I. THE PARTIES AND THE OPERATION 3. UPS is the ultimate parent company of the UPS group of companies. The UPS group is active in the field of worldwide package delivery as well as providing worldwide air and ground cargo transportation services, ocean freight brokerage services and complex supply chain services (including, in some cases, freight forwarding services). 4. MWF is a wholly owned subsidiary of CNF Inc, a USA based company involved in global supply chain services with businesses in regional trucking, airfreight, ocean freight, customs brokerage, global logistics management and trailer manufacturing. MWF is a worldwide provider of freight forwarding services, ground cargo transportation services and supply chain services. II. CONCENTRATION 5. UPS will acquire the freight forwarding operations of MWF by way of the purchase of shares. Pursuant to the Sale and Purchase Agreement, UPS will acquire only CNF s freight forwarding business, all of which will be transferred to MWF prior to the sale to UPS. At the same time MWF will transfer all business not connected to freight forwarding to CNF. The transaction will result in UPS having sole control of MWF. III. COMMUNITY DIMENSION 6. UPS and MWF have a combined aggregate world-wide turnover of more than EUR 5 billion 2 (UPS, EUR 26.7 billion and MWF, EUR 1.9 billion). Each of the undertakings have a Community-wide turnover in excess of EUR 250 million (UPS, EUR [ ] and MWF, EUR [ ]), but they do not achieve more than two-thirds of their aggregate Community-wide turnover within one and the same Member State. The notified operation therefore has a Community dimension. IV. COMPETITIVE ASSESSMENT (a) Relevant Product Market 7. The transaction involves the acquisition of MWF and specifically the freight forwarding business. The international air freight forwarding sector accounts for approximately [ ]% of MWF s total revenue in Europe. UPS is mainly active in the field of worldwide package delivery but is also active to a limited extent on the international air freight forwarding sector (included in the supply chain services which form a part of UPS s operations). In previous decisions 3 the Commission has defined freight forwarding services as a distinct product market from mail and parcel delivery. The notifying party submits that the present transaction concerns freight forwarding services including global air and ocean freight forwarding and emergency and expedited shipments. 2 Turnover calculated in accordance with Article 5(1) of the Merger Regulation and the Commission Notice on the calculation of turnover (OJ C66, 2.3.1998, p25). To the extent that figures include turnover for the period before 1.1.1999, they are calculated on the basis of average ECU exchange rates and translated into EUR on a one-for-one basis. 3 Case No COMP/M.2908 Deutsche Post/ DHL (II), Case No COMP/M.3155 - Deutsche Post/ Securicor 2

8. In previous decisions, the Commission has defined freight forwarding as the organisation of transportation of items (possibly including ancillary activities such as customs clearance, warehousing, ground services, etc.) on behalf of customers according to their needs 4. In the past, the Commission made a distinction between domestic and cross border freight forwarding. A further delineation was suggested between land, air and sea freight forwarding. In the Deutsche Post/Air Express International decision 5, the Commission did not rule out the possibility of a distinction between standard and express freight forwarding services. 9. Notwithstanding the above, the final delineation of the relevant product market for freight forwarding services could be left open as the notified transaction would not raise serious doubts even if the market is further subdivided. 10. The notifying party submits that the geographic market for freight forwarding may be European wide in view of the continued and increased trend towards internationalisation. The Commission has in the past left open the question as to whether freight forwarding should be considered national or wider 6 and in this case the geographic scope can remain open as even at a national level the transaction would not raise any competition concerns (b) Competitive Assessment 11. The transaction will result in limited horizontal overlap of the parties activities in the freight forwarding sector in the EEA. In the air freight forwarding sector the parties have a combined market share of much less than 15% in all national markets. In the sea freight forwarding sector the parties have a combined market share of less than 1% in all national markets. The combined market share for land freight forwarding and air express freight forwarding are minimal and estimated to be less than 1% in all national markets. 12. The notifying party submits that freight forwarding is a separate market that is not an upstream or downstream market to the parcel delivery service. MWF operates as an asset light company which means that it purchases air freight transport capacity from third parties rather than own the assets. As such it would not be in a position to offer plane transport to the parcel delivery service of UPS. UPS uses its own planes and third party planes for its parcel delivery service and its limited air freight services. It therefore has limited capacity to offer to third parties and in addition, there are many players on the market who could offer this capacity. The notified transaction is unlikely to result in vertical overlap of activities in respect of the parcel delivery service and the freight forwarding activities of MWF. 13. The Commission has found in the past that there is a potential vertical relationship between the market for international express documents and parcel services as input 4 Case No COMP/M. 1794 - Deutsche Post/Air Express International. 5 Case No COMP/M. 1794 - Deutsche Post/Air Express International. 6 Case No COMP/M. 1794 - Deutsche Post/Air Express International. 3

for the general logistics market 7. In this case there is no overlap as MWF does not offer contract logistics services. V. CONCLUSION 14. For the above reasons, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. For the Commission signed Neelie KROES Member of the Commission 7 Case No COMP/M. 2831 DSV/ TNT Logistics/ DSV Logistics 4