Habitat Restoration of Garoutte Prairie: 2016 Annual Report

Similar documents
Sensitive Species Monitoring and Habitat Restoration of Lost Creek Meadow

Hitchcock s blue-eyed grass (Sisyrinchium hitchcockii) Habitat Restoration at Lost Creek Meadow: 2016 Annual Report

THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES HABITAT RESTORATION: 2016 ANNUAL REPORT

Habitat Restoration of Horse Rock Ridge ACEC/RNA: 2017 Annual Report

Habitat Restoration of McGowan Meadow

Threatened and endangered species habitat restoration: 2017 Annual Report

Habitat Restoration of McGowan Meadow: 2016 Annual Report

POPULATION INTRODUCTION OF THE THIN-LEAVED PEAVINE: 2015 ANNUAL REPORT

Nelson s Checkermallow Recovery Project: Phase II (2018 Postimplementation

Heron Glen Wetland Buffer Enhancement Project. Progress Report. November 15, 2005

Wildlife Conservation Society Climate Adaptation Fund 2014 Restoring Oak Resilience at the Table Rocks, Rogue River Basin, Oregon FACT SHEET

1Bjorge et al. The Effects of Fire on Scotch Broom. Star Bjorge, Renée Davis, Peter Howard, Megann Schmitt*

Metro Clear Creek Canyon Natural Area Upper Bench Restoration Plan. Prepared for Metro By Institute for Applied Ecology

I-5/Mellen Street to Blakeslee Junction (Horseshoe Lake) Mitigation Site USACE IP NWS

City of Eugene IPM and its Implementation on 3 Projects. Eric Wold and Jesse Cary-Hobbs City of Eugene Parks and Open Space Division

CCSD#1 Stormwater Standards

Management of Invasive Plants in Toronto Parks and Ravines

2018 Arkansas State Wildlife Grant Pre-proposal

Appendix III. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services: Soil Types Letter

USE OF FIRE TO CONTROL FRENCH BROOM. David Boyd. California Department of Parks and Recreation 7665 Redwood Blvd. Novato, California 94945

Illinois DNR Conservation Ecosystems Program Project Grant Application for FY 2008

2016 Vegetation Monitoring at Herbert Farm & Natural Area: Phase I Restoration Web version

ATTACHMENT 4: DESCRIPTION OF TREATMENT TYPES MESABI PROJECT

Proposed Wildlife Habitat Restoration Project At Walking Iron Wildlife Area August 6, 2015

Oak woodland management: an example from California State Parks

Final Decision Memo. Murphy Meadow Restoration Project. USDA Forest Service Willamette National Forest McKenzie River Ranger District

Example of Analytical Essay, Part 1: Management of Prairies with Prescribed Fire in the Olympic Peninsula

Barrens Habitat Restoration Plan

LITTLE QUALICUM ESTUARY RESTORATION PROJECT QUALICUM BEACH, BC

Ecosystem Sustainability and the Cheatgrass Fire Cycle

Conservation Partners Legacy Grant Program

Mercer Island Open Space Projects PROGRESS REPORT 2005

Westside Restoration. Middle Fork Ranger District

APPENDIX A. KEY RIPARIAN FUNCTIONS, SUPPORTING VEGETATIVE CONDITIONS, AND RIPARIAN BUFFER DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

BLOOMINGDALE PARK DISTRICT SPRINGFIELD PARK WETLAND REPORT AND STEWARDSHIP PLAN

Example Forest Health Sections (Resource Category 1)

Introduction Prairies, a plant community dominated by grasses, were an integral part of the

8/10/2011. Lesson Overview. Rangelands. Rangelands. Brush management on rangelands. Advantages and disadvantages. Specific mechanical treatments

COWLITZ COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS RIGHT-OF-WAY VEGETATION MANAGEMENT POLICY

RESTORATION OF RARE PLANTS OF THE PALOUSE. Trish Heekin Conservation Planner Latah Soil and Water Conservation District

Wildlife Habitat Restoration and Improvements FY 2007 Project

Appendix A: Vegetation Treatments

FOR 433. Carolyn Hull Sieg. US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Flagstaff, AZ

A Pictorial Comparison of Seasonal Timing and Frequency of Prescribed Fire in Longleaf Pine Stands

BLM Office: Lakeview District, Klamath Falls Resource Area Phone #:

PRAIRIE HABITAT QUALITY CALCULATOR USER GUIDE

T h e F a c t s O n S h e e p E c o l o g y

REFORESTATION AFTER HARVEST

BLM Office: Lakeview District, Klamath Falls Resource Area Phone #:

Silvicultural practices in the restoration of degraded ecosystems

Fire and Biodiversity in British Columbia Ze ev Gedalof, Climate & Ecosystem Dynamics Research Lab, University of Guelph

Meeting the Challenge: Invasive Plants in Pacific Northwest Ecosystems

Appendix A: Vegetation Treatment Descriptions and Unit Specific Design Criteria

Defining tipping points in seedling survival and growth with competition thresholds. Andrew S. Nelson University of Idaho

BOARD OF WILDLIFE COMMISSIONERS

ANNUAL REPORT SHILLAPOO WILDLIFE AREA BPA Project #:

PROJECT INFORMATION Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project

Fuels Treatment Projects Application

Keywords. Roemers' fescue, Scotch broom, propagation, native species

Reading Project Noxious Weed Risk Assessment Hat Creek Ranger District Lassen National Forest April 3, 2013

Wildlife Habitat & Forest Resource Management Plan. Hickory Hills Park and Casey s Paha

Willamette Valley Native Plant Materials Partnership

Poker Chip Project. Noxious Weed Risk Assessment Almanor Ranger District Lassen National Forest

False brome Control. OSU McDonald Dunn Forest. Debbie Johnson Applegate Forestry LLC. closed canopy forest. meadow

An Integrated Approach to Invasive Species Control: Drury Wetland. Kara DeGraff

MICROSITE PLANTING SEEDLING REQUIREMENTS AND GROWTH LIMITING FACTORS

SR 161: Jovita Boulevard to South 360th St. Stage 2 / WSDOT Stream Buffer Mitigation (Agreement Y-9403) 2012 Final Monitoring Report

2012 Arkansas State Wildlife Grant Pre-proposal

Project Name: Gerber Stew Stewardship Contract CX Log #: OR-014 CX Chase Mtn./ Upper Bear Valley Plantation Thinnings

Position Description Sierra Nevada AmeriCorps Partnership

In this presentation, I will discuss the nature of the prairie, the management challenges, and the management responses.

Ecological principles involving the use of fire in grassland and grassy woodland

Writing Performance Standards for Wetland Mitigation

1792/5400 (OR-120) Umpqua River Sawyer Rapids EA OR Purdy Creek DM OR120-TS Dear Citizen:

ROCK CREEK FUELS AND VEGETATION PROJECT FORESTED VEGETATION ANALYSIS Karl Fuelling 9/18/2015

Forest Characteristics. Integrating Forest Management and Wildlife. Effects of Silvicultural Practices. Management of Succession

CY 2015 CY 2016 CY 2017 CY 2018 CY 2019 VMP

Abstract. History. Volume 57, Number 1 (2014)

Ecology of Pacific Madrone. Glenn Ahrens Oregon State University Extension Forestry and Natural Resources Hardwood Silviculture Cooperative

Bald Fire Salvage and Restoration Project

Bush Honeysuckle Control Options and Strategies

Prepared by: Skamania County Noxious Weed Control Program Post Office Box Rock Creek Drive Stevenson, Washington

Sonoma Land Trust. Working Forest, Sustainable Forestry, Forest Certification What Do They Mean?

Pea Ridge Battlefield Prescribed Burning. Introduction. Prescribed burns involve the burning of controlled areas as a means of improving ecology and

Southern Rowe Mesa Restoration Project. Scoping Report

Group Selection Cutting in Mature Douglas-fir Forests

Mike Pellant Bureau of Land Mgt. Boise, ID. An Overview on Research and Studies on Diversifying Crested Wheatgrass Seedings

Rangeland CEAP Literature Synthesis: Conclusions and Recommendations

FUNDING SOURCE: Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund LEGAL CITATION: M.L. 2010, Chp. 362, Sec. 2, Subd. 4f2p

Short Form Botany Resource Reports:

Botany Resource Reports:

Restoration, resource innovation & sustainability:

Table Number. Names School Grade. Part 4: Which plant is the ranger talking about? February 16, 2016

Winterfest. Saturday, January 21 st. 9:30 a.m. ~ Bird Behaviors & Identification

PUBLIC COPY. Andrea S. Thorpe, Ph.D. and Thomas N. Kaye, Ph.D. Institute for Applied Ecology

SR nd Street SE to 112th Street SE (527 Widening) Mitigation Site WIN # A52720B USACE NWP (14)

Treatments for preventing and controlling Scotch broom

Invasive Plant Control at Glacial Heritage Preserve

Sharp-tailed Grouse Management on Moquah Barrens. Thomas C. J Doolittle, Wildlife Biologist, USDA Forest Service Washburn, WI

Frontenac State Park Management Plan Amendment

Transcription:

Habitat Restoration of Garoutte Prairie: 2016 Annual Report 3/31/2017 Report prepared for the Bureau of Land Management, Agreement #L13AC00098 Report prepared by Anna Ramthun and Andy Neill Institute for Applied Ecology

PREFACE This report is the result of agreements L13AC00098-0035 and L13AC00098-0042 between USDI Bureau of Land Management, Northwest Oregon District and Institute for Applied Ecology (IAE), Corvallis, Oregon. IAE is a non-profit organization whose mission is conservation of native ecosystems through restoration, research and education. IAE provides services to public and private agencies and individuals through development and communication of information on ecosystems, species, and effective management strategies. Restoration of habitats, with a concentration on rare and invasive species, is a primary focus. IAE conducts its work through partnerships with a diverse group of agencies, organizations and the private sector. IAE aims to link its community with native habitats through education and outreach. Questions regarding this report or IAE should be directed to: Thomas Kaye (Executive Director) Institute for Applied Ecology 563 SW Jefferson Avenue Corvallis, Oregon 97333 phone: 541-753-3099 fax: 541-753-3098 email: tom@appliedeco.org Page 2

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Funding for this project was provided by the United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Northwest Oregon District. We thank Cheshire Mayrsohn of the BLM for the assistance to preserve prairie habitats within and around the Willamette Valley, Oregon. Additional thanks to the members of the National Civilian Community Corps (NCCC) AmeriCorps Gold 5 team and Institute for Applied Ecology (IAE) volunteer David Zahler for their contributions to Scotch broom and tree removal. Cover photographs: Garoutte Prairie. Photo by Andy Neill, August 6, 2014. SUGGESTED CITATION Ramthun, A. and A. Neill. 2017. Habitat Restoration of Garoutte Prairie: 2016 Report. Report prepared for the Bureau of Land Management, Northwest Oregon District. Institute for Applied Ecology, Corvallis. Page 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE... 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS... 3 SUGGESTED CITATION... 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS... 4 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 5 2. INTRODUCTION... 5 3. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES... 6 4. 2016 RESTORATION ACTIVITIES... 6 5. DISCUSSION... 8 6. RECOMMENDATIONS... 8 7. REFERENCES... 9 8. APPENDICES... 10 Appendix A: Restoration subunits at Garoutte Prairie... 10 Appendix B: Restoration Activities at Garoutte Prairie (2013-2017)... 11 Page 4

Habitat Restoration of Garoutte Prairie: 2016 Annual Report R E P O R T S U B M I T T E D T O T H E B U R E A U O F L A N D M A N A G E M E N T 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report summarizes the habitat restoration work conducted by the Institute for Applied Ecology (IAE) at Garoutte Prairie in 2016. Restoration efforts focused on conservation of high quality wet prairie habitat and associated native plant species by the manual removal of encroaching woody species such as Oregon Ash (Fraxinus latifolia), introduced apple (Malus sp.), and hawthorn (Crataegus sp.), and Scotch broom (Cytisus scoparius), as well as treatment of non-native weeds, such as teasel (Dipsacus fullonum) at the site. 2. INTRODUCTION Garoutte Prairie (cover photo) is located in Lane County, Oregon, just west of Dorena Lake along Garoutte Road (Figure 1). The site is managed by the Bureau of Land Management s Northwest Oregon District office. IAE began habitat restoration work at Garoutte Prairie as part of another BLM-funded project at the nearby Dorena Prairie in 2013 (Figure 1, Banner and Axt 2013). The site became an independent restoration project in 2016. Figure 1: Location of Dorena and Garoutte Prairies Page 5

In addition to many wet prairie plant species present on the site, Garoutte Prairie also hosts a population of a rare lichen, sulcaria (Sulcaria badia). Garoutte Prairie is the northernmost location for this species, and maintaining this population is important for the preservation of the genetic diversity of this species. Potential changes in climate suggest that this population of sulcaria at Garoutte Prairie may also be important as warmer conditions may push the distribution of this species to the north. Throughout the course of restoration work at Garoutte Prairie, effort will be made to avoid disturbing trees, primarily Oregon ash, where this species is observed. 3. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The goal of this project is to actively restore regionally rare upland prairie habitat at Garoutte Prairie Northwest Oregon District. The three primary objectives of this project are to restore and maintain quality prairie habitat by: 1. Reducing non-native invasive species, 2. Controlling woody species encroachment, and 3. Augmenting the native plant community to increase both native species abundance and diversity. 4. 2016 RESTORATION ACTIVITIES Garoutte Prairie 2016 restoration activities focused on manually pulling Scotch broom and removal of encroaching woody species such as Oregon ash, apple, and hawthorn trees in the upland prairie habitat at the site (Table 1, Figures 2 and 3). Trees were cut using chainsaws and brush cutters, and were bucked and piled either in the conifer forest along the southern edge of the prairie or on top of patches of Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus)for burning in fall 2017. See Table 1 for a summary of all restoration activities implemented in 2016. See Table 2 for a breakdown of costs for incurred in 2016. See Appendix B for a summary of all restoration activities to date at this site. Table 1. Restoration activities conducted by the Institute for Applied Ecology at Garoutte Prairie during 2016. Date Task Labor (Hrs) 03/24/2016 Site visit and weed assessment of Dorena and Garoutte Prairies 2 12/7/2016 Felled and piled Oregon ash, hawthorn, and apple with AmeriCorps crew 8 12/13/2016 Felled and piled Oregon ash, hawthorn, and apple with 1 volunteer and 9 AmeriCorps Gold 5 crew. Page 6

Figure 3. Encroaching woody species in Garoutte Prairie (left) and the same view after most of the trees and shrubs have been removed (right). (Photos: G. Banner, Sept. 12, 2014 and A. Neill., Dec. 13 2016). Figure 2. Before (left) and after Scotch broom and Oregon ash removal. (Photos: A. Neill., Dec. 13 2016) Table 2. Budget breakdown of restoration activities at Garoutte Prairie during 2016. Budget Item Cost Contracted Services $0.00 Supplies $0.00 Travel $0.00 Labor $1,817.23 Admin $381.63 Total $2,198.86 Page 7

5. DISCUSSION In 2016, the primary focus of restoration was the removal of encroaching trees from Priority Areas 1 and 2 (Appendix A). Oregon ash, apple, and hawthorn trees have proliferated throughout the prairie. The secondary succession species block sunlight restricting growth of native prairie species. Tree removal efforts effectively expanded prairie habitat at Garoutte Prairie (Figures 2 and 3). IAE also targeted Scotch broom and Himalayan blackberry for manual removal in 2016. While these efforts did prevent expansion of these invasive species, substantial reduction and eradication will require the use of more intensive manual and/or chemical treatments. Currently, work at Garoutte Prairie has focused on maintaining prairie structure and preventing the expansion of populations of targeted non-native invasive species. Expansion of native populations and diversity will only be possible with further reduction and control of invasive species. Continued removal of invasive species will release native vegetation and may continue to allow re-emergence or recolonization by native species. 6. RECOMMENDATIONS The overarching goal for Garoutte Prairie continues to be the active restoration of regionally rare upland prairie habitat by removing trees, controlling priority invasive species, and augmenting native plant populations. In order to achieve this goal, the following actions are recommended: Continue manual removal of encroaching woody species into prairie habitat. To date, tree removal has been primarily focused on priority areas 1 and 2 (see Appendix A). As woody encroachment control in these areas is completed, future efforts can shift to other priority areas, such as focusing on the removal of the conifer forest plantation that occupies the southern portion of the project site to create upland prairie habitat. Without the use of herbicide to prevent resprouting from stumps, repeated efforts will be need to cut the resprouts. Preventing growth of photosynthetic material will eventually kill the tree. Pending approval of herbicide use at Garoutte Prairie, treat cut tree stumps with herbicide to prevent resprouting. Continue to annually track and manually remove high priority invasive species such as Scotch broom, teasel, and Himalayan blackberry within the open prairie habitat. Himalayan blackberry will require continuing efforts with mechanical removal as the existing individuals have extensive underground root systems. Similarly, Scotch broom seed remain viable in the seedbank for many years which will require pulling for years to come as the seeds germinate and plants grow. As effective control of the targeted weeds is achieved in the main prairie, shift the focus of weed removal efforts to the edges of the prairie where it transitions to Douglas fir forest. Continue prevention of the expansion of weed species with relatively low abundance, such as Canada thistle, by removing seed heads and reducing seed set. Reduction and eradication of these species at the site will most likely require the use of herbicide. Pending approval of herbicide use at the site, treat high priority weeds by surveying for and spot spraying individuals and patches of these species. Page 8

Pending approval of herbicide use at the site, treat non-native rhizomatous grasses with a grass-specific herbicide, followed by direct seeding of native grasses and forbs. If possible, implement a prescribed burning regimen at Garoutte Prairie, with a frequency of every 3-4 years, in order to control encroaching woody and invasive species. In the absence of prescribed fire, begin an annual regime of mowing the site in the late summer in order to control encroachment of woody species and invasive weeds. As prairie habitat expands and the quality of the habitat improves through the removal of undesired species, augment populations of wet and upland prairie species to increase the abundance and diversity of the native plant community. 7. REFERENCES Banner, G and B. Axt. 2013. Restoration of Dorena Prairie ACEC. Institute for Applied Ecology, Corvallis, Oregon and USDI Bureau of Land Management, Northwest Oregon District. Page 9

8. APPENDICES Appendix A: Restoration subunits at Garoutte Prairie The aerial photo below shows the prioritized restoration subunits at Garoutte Prairie. Work to date has primarily focused on Priority Areas 1 and 2. Page 10

Appendix B: Restoration Activities at Garoutte Prairie (2013-2017) 2013 Brush cutting to remove Himalayan blackberry and Scotch broom. 2014 Site inspection and partner coordination. Scotch broom, Himalayan blackberry, and fruit tree removal. 2016 Site inspection and partner coordination. Scotch broom, Oregon ash, hawthorn, and fruit tree removal with AmeriCorps Gold 5. 2017 (pending) Site inspection and partner coordination. Vegetation surveys. Periodic brush cutting of stump resprouts. Cover burn piles with plastic for fall burning. Scotch broom, Oregon ash, hawthorn and fruit tree removal with AmeriCorps. Burn slash piles in fall. Page 11