Long Bridge Project. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Revised Purpose and Need

Similar documents
Long Bridge Project. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Revised Purpose and Need

Long Bridge Project. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Alternatives Development Report. June 19, 2018

WELCOME TO THE LONG BRIDGE PROJECT

Public Meeting. Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Section 106 Consultation. Preferred Alternative Selection November 29, 2018

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/ Section 106 Public Meeting Proposed Alternatives. December 14, 2017

LONG BRIDGE CAPACITY NEEDS. Oscar J. Gonzalez Virginia Railway Express Project Manager Alexandria, VA

NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING BOARD

Project Overview. A Collaborative Effort

VRE AT WORK PREPARING VIRGINIA RAILROADING FOR ITS NEXT QUARTER CENTURY

Long Bridge - Present & Future: A Multimodal Analysis

LONG BRIDGE - PRESENT & FUTURE: A MULTIMODAL ANALYSIS

Section IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. 7. Implementation Plan

Environmental Impact Statement for the Baltimore-Washington Superconducting Maglev (SCMAGLEV) Project, between Baltimore, Maryland and Washington, DC

VTrans2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan Corridors of Statewide Significance Needs Assessment North-South Corridor

Section IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. 7. Implementation Plan

1.1 Environmental Assessment/Environmental Impact Evaluation for the New Haven, Hartford and Springfield High-Speed Intercity Rail Project

MEMORANDUM EXAMPLES FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES NEXT STEPS. Item 3 Long-Range Plan Task Force May 17, 2017

Environmental Impact Statement for the Southeast High Speed Rail Project from

Tier 2 Environmental Impact Statement for the High-Speed Rail Project from Granite

GULF COAST RAIL DISTRICT VISION FOR REGIONAL RAIL

Developing New Revenue Streams For Transit

Northern Virginia Region Draft Needs Summary

VTrans2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan Corridors of Statewide Significance Needs Assessment Eastern Shore Corridor (D)

NEED ECONOMIC TRANSPORTATION LOCATIONS EXAMPLE

VTrans2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan Corridors of Statewide Significance Needs Assessment North-South Corridor (G)

Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement for the Chicago, Illinois, to Detroit-Pontiac,

VTrans2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan Corridors of Statewide Significance Needs Assessment Eastern Shore Corridor

MARC Brunswick/Frederick Line Improvement Proposal

ITEM #11: PHASE 2B SUPPLEMENT HAMPTON ROADS PASSENGER RAIL STUDY: SCOPE OF WORK

Evaluation of Alternatives

VRE Gainesville-Haymarket Alternatives Analysis Report

C. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES OF INTEREST

Report to Governor-elect Northam From Transition Policy Council on Transportation

Corridors of Statewide Significance: Introduction

Massachusetts Rail Plan. September 16, 2010

VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) RFP No

VTrans2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan Corridors of Statewide Significance Needs Assessment Western Mountain Corridor (L)

Fairfax County Countywide Transit Network Study

VTrans2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan Corridors of Statewide Significance Needs Assessment Coastal Corridor (A)

Appendix D Presentation Slides with Script

Transportation Committee DRPT Presentation

VTrans2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan Corridors of Statewide Significance Needs Assessment Washington to North Carolina Corridor (K)

Environmental Impact Statement for the California High-Speed Rail System Burbank to Los Angeles Section, CA

VDOT and DRPT MPO and PDC Winter Meeting Amy Inman Planning & Mobility Programs Administrator Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation

CHAPTER 5: TRANSPORTATION

Statewide Multimodal Networks

ATTACHMENT A. Detailed Study Scope. I-66 (Inside) Multi-modal Study Scope

12 Evaluation of Alternatives

AGENDA ITEM #8: HAMPTON ROADS PASSENGER RAIL STUDY HIGH SPEED RAIL SERVICE ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS: PHASE 2B DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK

Rail Corridor Feasibility Study

Appendix C Presentation Slides with Script

Notice of Preparation For Link Union Station (Link US) Project. Joint Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report

Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization. Hampton Roads Passenger Rail Study Data Collection. Phase 2A. Presentation To.

1.0 INTRODUCTION Federal Mandate for State Rail Plans Stakeholder Consultation Ongoing Planning Process...

Baltimore & Potomac Tunnel Project.

Environmental Impact Statement; Lone Star Regional Rail Project Williamson, Travis, Bastrop, Hays, Caldwell, Comal, Guadalupe, and Bexar Counties, TX

FROM THE CHAIR By: Michael Dorweiler, AICP 2007 Chairman for the Tampa Bay Applications Group DATES TO REMEMBER

Nomination for Virginia Railway Express 2013 Rail Disaster Drill. Category: Emergency Preparedness- Rail Security Awarding

February 24, Basis of Design. Technical Criteria for Concept & Preliminary Engineering. Final Report

Environmental Impact Statement for the Green Line to the Airport Project. ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).

WELCOME. Schedule. Contact Information. Please Provide Written Comments

Public Hearing for April 2018 Major Service Changes. January 4, 2018

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR HOUSTON DALLAS HIGH SPEED RAIL (TEXAS CENTRAL)

ARLINGTON COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...V

Executive Steering Committee Meeting #1: Minutes

Southeastern Minnesota Freight Rail Capacity Study

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MEMORANDUM

Chapter 1: The 2035 Virginia Surface Transportation Plan 1. Challenges & Opportunities 2 VTrans2035: The Precursor 2 The VSTP and VTrans2035 2

Contents i Contents Page 1 A New Transportation Plan Community Involvement Goals and Objectives... 11

Pacific Northwest High Speed Rail Corridor Amtrak Cascades Passenger Service Update

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

1. Evaluation of route and service alternatives; 2. Tier 1 Environmental Impact Analysis; and 3. Service Development Plan.

Preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for High Capacity Transit

PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION

VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS INDUSTRY DAY February 8, 2018

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. ACEforward Notice of Additional Project Element Niles Junction Connections

3. STATION SPACING AND SITING GUIDELINES

Northern Intermodal Transit Facility WHAT IS AN INTERMODAL TRANSIT FACILITY?

Northeast Rail Operations Study (NEROps)

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM

2004 FEASIBILITY STUDY UPDATE

NEW JERSEY STATE RAIL PLAN NJ TRANSIT New Jersey Department of Transportation

VTrans2040. VTrans Multimodal Transportation Plan (VMTP) Regional Network 2025 Needs Assessment. HRTPO TTAC July 1, 2015

2015 HDR, all rights reserved.

REPORT. Freight Physical Infrastructure Profile May 11, Submitted to: Rappahannock-Rapidan Regional Commission (RRRC)

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)

Carolina Connector Intermodal Terminal (CCX)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FREIGHT PLAN

HAMPTON ROADS HIGH-SPEED AND INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL PRELIMINARY VISION PLAN

Presentation To: HRTPO Passenger Rail Task Force

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update Issue Paper S.6: Potential Tacoma Link Extension - East. Prepared for: Sound Transit

Chapter 3 - Goals, Objectives, & Strategies

DRAFT Scoping Booklet

Preapplication for HSIPR Program OMB No

Twin Cities-Milwaukee-Chicago Intercity Passenger Rail Phase I Study Twin Cities- Milwaukee High Speed Rail to Chicago Corridor Study

Northeast Rail Operations Study (NEROps)

Strategic Long-Term High-Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail Plan: Phase 2 Study Approach

Regional Transit System Plan

3.0 REVIEW OF PREVIOUS STUDIES

Transcription:

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Revised Purpose and Need November 9, 2017

1.0 What is the Proposed Action? The consists of potential improvements to the Long Bridge and related railroad infrastructure located between Rosslyn (RO) Interlocking in Arlington, Virginia, and L Enfant (LE) Interlocking near L Enfant Plaza SW in Washington, DC. 2.0 What is the Long Bridge Corridor? The Long Bridge, constructed in 1904, is a two-track railroad bridge located in the Washington Monumental Core. The existing Long Bridge is owned and operated by CSX Transportation (CSXT), a Class I freight railroad, which also operates the Long Bridge Corridor. In addition to CSXT freight trains, the bridge is also currently utilized by Amtrak and Virginia Railway Express (VRE). The Long Bridge Corridor extends approximately 1.8 miles between Arlington, Virginia and Washington, DC. The Long Bridge Corridor includes Federal parkland managed by the National Park Service; historic and cultural properties; the Potomac River; residential buildings, offices, and hotels; and transportation facilities (VRE L Enfant Station, Long Bridge, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority [WMATA] Metrorail right-of-way and bridge, five other railroad bridges, four roadway bridges, and numerous pedestrian and bicycle trails). The District Department of Transportation (DDOT) and the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) updated the Project Area limits of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on November 9, 2017 from what has been previously presented to the agencies and the public. The updated Project Area limits are based on project refinement and additional information related to other projects in the area. These changes are reflected in the revised Coordination Plan. The consists of potential improvements to the bridge and related railroad infrastructure located between the RO Interlocking in Arlington, Virginia near Long Bridge Park and LE Interlocking in Washington, DC. The connects logical termini, has independent utility even if no additional transportation improvements in the area are made; and does not restrict consideration of alternatives for other reasonably foreseeable transportation improvements in the area. The updated Project Area limits are based on the following: Concept refinement to date has established that any physical changes to existing infrastructure would not extend beyond the RO and LE interlockings. The official northern terminus of the DC to Richmond Southeast High-Speed Rail (DC2RVA) project as stated in the Tier II Draft EIS is Control Point Rosslyn (RO) at milepost CFP 110 in Arlington, Virginia. The RO Interlocking provides a transition point between these separate and independent projects and is therefore the appropriate place to set the limits of the. The planned Virginia Railway Express (VRE) L Enfant Station and storage track project includes the eventual conversion of the existing storage tracks into a full fourth track between LE and Virginia 1 1

Interlockings. The LE Interlocking provides a transition point between the separate and independent Long Bridge and VRE projects and is therefore the appropriate place to set the limits of the. 3.0 What is the Purpose and Need of the Proposed Action? This Purpose and Need Statement for the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has been prepared by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and the District Department of Transportation (DDOT). FRA is the lead Federal agency and DDOT is the joint lead agency for the EIS. This Statement was prepared as part of the development of an EIS in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Council of Environmental Quality (CEQ) NEPA Regulations (40 C.F.R. Parts 1500 1508), the FRA Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts (64 Federal Register [FR] 28545 [May 26, 1999]), and FRA s Update to NEPA Implementing Procedures (78 FR 2713 [January 14, 2013]). FRA issued a Notice of Intent to prepare the EIS in August 2016, which included a draft Purpose and Need Statement. FRA and DDOT invited public and agency comment on the draft Purpose and Need Statement. Based on these comments, FRA and DDOT have prepared the revised Purpose and Need Statement below. Purpose and Need Statement The purpose of the Proposed Action is to provide additional long-term railroad capacity and to improve the reliability of railroad service through the Long Bridge Corridor. Currently, there is insufficient capacity, resiliency, and redundancy to accommodate the projected demand in future railroad services. The Proposed Action is needed to address these issues and to ensure the Long Bridge Corridor continues to serve as a critical link connecting the local, regional, and national transportation network. 4.0 Why is the Proposed Action needed? Insufficient Railroad Capacity. The Long Bridge Corridor must accommodate combined commuter, intercity passenger, and freight railroad services with minimal operational delays now and in the future. By the forecast year of 2040, passenger and freight train volumes are expected to increase by 150 percent. 1 Capacity constraints at critical infrastructure chokepoints, such as the current Long Bridge, limit service expansion as well as the ability to recover from service delays, making it difficult to accommodate growth in ridership and offer reliable service. Without additional capacity, the increased volumes in 2040 and beyond would strain the railroad network through the Long Bridge Corridor. 1 Expected train volumes in 2040 were established based on input from bridge stakeholders, including CSXT, VRE, Amtrak, Norfolk Southern, and MARC, as well as the concurrent DC2RVA study. 2 2

To meet future demand, the railroad network will need to be able to maintain schedules under normal operations for all types of train travel, as well as provide flexibility to recover during periods of higher demand and service delays. Based on long-term adopted regional, state, and local transportation plans, the Long Bridge Corridor will continue to be shared by commuter, intercity passenger, and freight railroad services, each of which has different operating characteristics that may conflict (e.g., commuter railroads generally make intra-corridor station stops, while intercity railroads generally do not). Under scheduled conditions, each train occupies an assigned time slot and does not interfere with other trains. 2 However, if a train is delayed and falls outside its time slot, it could delay other trains. Under those conditions, the capacity of the corridor is governed by the slowest train. The ability to recover from service delays, and to limit conflicts, is primarily achieved by providing tracks and crossovers that allow trains to pass each other. Continued Network Connectivity. The Long Bridge Corridor plays an essential role in the Washington metropolitan region and the East Coast transportation network by providing passenger and freight services. The Long Bridge Corridor connects intercity passenger trains from the Northeast Corridor to major transportation points in the South. The Long Bridge Corridor also connects the Virginia suburbs to established employment centers in downtown Washington, DC, and Crystal City in Arlington, Virginia. CSXT uses the Long Bridge corridor to connect goods and customers using freight and intermodal facilities through CSXT s network, including Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Baltimore and Cumberland, Maryland; Newport News, Virginia; and Rocky Mount, North Carolina. Consistent with features shown in adopted regional, state, and local transportation plans, and with railroad operator plans, the Long Bridge Corridor must facilitate the movement of people and goods, including connections to other parts of the transportation network. Currently the Long Bridge is a chokepoint, which limits the ability both to facilitate planned highperformance passenger railroad service between the population centers and provide freight service along the Eastern Seaboard. The existing commuter rail systems (MARC and VRE) both terminate all trains at Washington Union Station, which limits the ability to provide cross-jurisdictional trips for passengers (Virginia to Maryland and vice versa). For commuter railroad passengers, network connectivity also includes access to and from stations within the corridor and transfers to other transportation services such as Metrorail at transportation hubs. VRE s two most utilized stations are within the Long Bridge corridor at Crystal City and L Enfant. More than 86 percent of VRE customers transfer to their final destination via Metrorail or walking. 3 Insufficient Resiliency and Redundancy. Resiliency and redundancy are important factors in maintaining normal operations during planned and unplanned events. Resiliency in a railroad context is defined as the ability of a railroad network to resume normal operations and minimize cascading delays following an unplanned event. System redundancy is the duplication of critical components or functions of the railroad system to increase the reliability of the railroad corridor and ensure that it is resilient to changing 2 Time slot is defined as the time and location in the corridor a train is assigned in a timetable. Time slots vary based on the operating characteristics of a train, including whether it makes intermediate stops within the corridor. 3 Source: VRE 2017 Master Agreement Survey, February 22, 2017 3 3

circumstances. Redundancy enables the railroad system to continue to function during unanticipated outages, catastrophic incidents, or weather-related events, as well as during planned maintenance. Currently, the railroad network lacks resiliency. The current two-track configuration of the Long Bridge is a physical bottleneck that prevents efficient train flow to the existing three-track and planned four-track sections located north and south of the Long Bridge. Substantial delays to intercity train service occur in the corridor daily, particularly between Washington, DC, and Alexandria, Virginia. CSXT freight operations are impacted by the current volume of commuter and intercity passenger trains, which limits their ability to operate during peak passenger periods and hinders the flow of their national network. Freight trains are frequently stopped to allow passenger railroad service to pass through the Corridor, affecting the efficiency and reliability of freight movements. Currently the railroad network lacks redundancy. Due to the narrow space between the existing two tracks, both tracks need to be closed during construction or maintenance for safety reasons. When both tracks are closed, service across the Long Bridge is interrupted, and VRE and Amtrak are not able to provide train service from Virginia across the Potomac River to their primary destinations of L Enfant Plaza or Washington Union Station and vice versa. Under those conditions, CSXT trains are redirected approximately 48 miles northwest to the crossing at Harpers Ferry, the next closest freight railroad crossing, substantially increasing service cost and time for CSXT. In addition, incorporating redundant and resilient railroad facilities provides the necessary back-up that can maintain corridor services and minimize service disruptions during a wide range of planned and unplanned maintenance and upgrades to the system. Providing resiliency and redundancy will better support the reliability of the Long Bridge Corridor and help ensure that it is adaptable to changing circumstances. 5.0 Will the consider bicycle and pedestrian access? Although not part of the Proposed Action s Purpose and Need, the will explore the potential opportunity to accommodate connections that follow the trajectory of the Long Bridge Corridor to the pedestrian and bicycle network. The feasibility of this opportunity will be assessed as the Project progresses, and will consider whether a path can be designed to be consistent with railroad operator plans and pursuant to railroad safety practices. Future efforts to accommodate connections to the pedestrian and bicycle network may be advanced as part of the Project, or as part of a separate project(s) sponsored by independent entities. 4 4