OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD, AND FORESTRY MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION SERVICE OKLAHOMA CITY, OK

Similar documents
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD, AND FORESTRY MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION SERVICE OKLAHOMA CITY, OK

OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD, AND FORESTRY MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION SERVICE OKLAHOMA CITY, OK

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

Testing for Salmonella in Raw Meat and Poultry Products Collected at Federally Inspected Establishments in the United States, 1998 through 2000

OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD, AND FORESTRY MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION SERVICE OKLAHOMA CITY, OK

FSIS DIRECTIVE 10, /15/06

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC MICROBIAL SAMPLING OF READY-TO-EAT (RTE) PRODUCTS

USDA-FSIS Agency Report 2012 Fall Executive Board Meeting Conference for Food Protection

OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD, AND FORESTRY MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION SERVICE OKLAHOMA CITY, OK. RECAll OF MEAT AND POULTRY PRODUCTS

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

Egg Products Inspection Verification

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

Nationwide Microbiological Baseline Data Collected by Sponge Sampling during 1997 and 1998 for Cattle, Swine, Turkeys, and Geese

Best Practices for Using Microbiological Sampling

Collection, Handling, and Transport of Food Samples to NM SLD

FSIS PERSPECTIVE ON PATHOGEN PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. Patricia S. Schwartz, Ph.D. Office of Policy and Program Development FSIS, USDA

STATEMENT OF HACCP COMPLIANCE

USDA NEW POULTRY INSPECTION SYSTEM: WHAT ARE THE MAJOR ISSUES?

SANITATION STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Establishment Name Date Establishment Address Establishment Number Establishment City, State, Zip Code. Date: Approved by:

Salmonella Verification Sample Result Reporting: Agency. AGENCY: Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

USDA Poultry Regulations To Undergo Major Overhaul

Food Safety and Inspection Service:

Re-assessment of HACCP is conducted annually and final approval is given by the Department of Agriculture.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

John G. Surak PhD Surak and Associates Clemson, SC

Generic HACCP Model for Raw, Not Ground Meat and Poultry Products

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE (HACCP-PREERQUISITES LETTER) December 2016

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

Modernization of Meat Inspection in Swine Status for USA

Pathogen Reduction: a food safety priority

THE HACCP-BASED INSPECTION MODELS PROJECT

OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD, AND FORESTRY MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION SERVICE OKLAHOMA CITY, OK

Hogan Lovells US LLP Columbia Square 555 Thirteenth Street, NW Washington, DC T F

Elements of NPIS. Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection (NPIS) Elements of NPIS. Questions About the NPIS

Food Safety and Inspection Service A review of laboratory-based regulatory and response activities.

Validation In Plant Findings

Industry Best Practices for Customer Complaints of Foreign Material in Meat and Poultry Products. August 2018

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

Table of Contents. How to Use This Service. Order of Chapters... iii. Contents of Appendices... How Tabs and Sections are Numbered...

Meat and Poultry Recalls USDA, FSIS

USDA-FSIS Agency Report 2016 Biennial Conference for Food Protection

Chairman, Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies

Table of Contents. Introduction...1

EFFECTIVENESS CHECKS

INDUSTRY INFORMATION SESSION Agenda

RMOP REQUIRED METHODS OF OPERATION PROCEDURES FOR ESTABLISHMENTS EXPORTING BEEF TO CANADA: COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIAL CONDITIONS

Appendix J - Guidelines for the Development of an Environmental Sampling Program

SYST 699 Team USDA Data Collection Plan. Team Members: Christopher Bang Amanda Kryway Scott Motter Karen Tung

A Multi-Step Evaluation of the Economic Effects of USDA s 1996 HACCP Regulation on Meat and Poultry Plants

Meat and Poultry Handler Requirements. Dr. Martha Styles

Creating Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) Plans that are FSIS-Compliant

Utilization of Microbial Data to Improve Food Safety Systems

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE (HACCP-PREERQUISITES LETTER) July 2015

The Prerequisites Program includes:

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON. D.C. TIME/TEMPERATURE GUIDELINES FOR COOLING HEATED PRODUCTS

January 8, Dear Valued Customer:

Lessons from USDA s Mandatory HACCP Rule for Meat and Poultry

Guidance Document for Sampling and Lotting of Beef Products and Sample Analysis for Pathogens. Developed by: Beef Industry Food Safety Council

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC AVAILABILITY OF QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS EXPORT CERTIFICATION

- DRAFT - October 18, 2005

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION. January 8, Mr. Ron Foster, CEO. P.O. Box 457. Dear Mr. Foster:

Top of Mind Regulatory Issues. Norm Robertson January, 2018, IPPE

Poultry and Egg Regulations in Maryland. Deanna Baldwin, Program Manager Food Quality Assurance

Technological Improvements in Outbreak Prevention

Table of Contents Page

Principle 6. Verification & Validation

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC AVAILABILITY OF CLEANING FREQUENCY QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

The following guidelines are intended to control contamination by. 4Escherichia coli (E. coli) O157:H7 and other pathogenic Shiga-toxin producing E.

STEC in the Beef Industry ( ) Presented by: John Ruby, PhD VP PassTrac Analytics

Food Safety and Inspection Service:

Control of Listeria monocytogenes in Ready-to-Eat Meat and. AGENCY: Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA.

Traceability Recordkeeping: A Public Health Vulnerability

USDA-FSIS Recall Procedures

Poultry and Egg Regulations in Maryland. Deanna Baldwin, Program Manager Food Quality Assurance

INQUIRY Swift Beef Co., Establishment 969G Export of Ineligible Beef to Japan

SAMPLE HANDLING PROCEDURES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

Requirements for Beef and Beef Products to be Exported to Japan from the United States of America January 25, 2013

Microbial Risk Factors Associated With Condensation In Ready-To-Eat Processing Facilities

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service. Recordkeeping: A Public Health Vulnerability

Top of Mind Regulatory Issues. Norm Robertson VP, Regulatory Services The Meat Institute February 1, 2017, IPPE

Guidance Document for Lotting and Sampling of Beef Products for Pathogen Analysis. Developed by: Beef Industry Food Safety Council

Appendix A Compliance Guidelines For Meeting Lethality Performance Standards For Certain Meat And Poultry Products

Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection (Docket No. FSIS )

should remain in refrigerated or frozen state.

Bringing Farm to Market: What to know before selling your fresh produce, dairy, eggs, meats, baked items and processed foods.

HACCP AND MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION. John W. McCutcheon Associate Deputy Administrator, Field Operations Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA

instructions on how to use these model plans, as well as explanations of specific plan elements.

Quality Assurance Programme - raw meat for further processing plants supplying a fast food chain

Guidance Document for Sampling and Lotting of Beef Products and Sample Analysis for Pathogens Developed by the Beef Industry Food Safety Council

OneUSDA Do right and feed everyone

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF POULTRY.

E C THROSBY PTY LIMITED Livestock Buyers & Meat Exporters

CN Quality Control Program Review Checklist

Best Practices in Pathogen and Allergen Testing

PROCESSING SCHEDULING SERVICE

Transcription:

OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD, AND FORESTRY MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION SERVICE OKLAHOMA CITY, OK MPI NOTICE 604 Rev. 1 9/20/12 OKLAHOMA SALMONELLA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS SAMPLING PROGRAM I. PURPOSE This notice provides Oklahoma MPI personnel with updated instructions about the amended procedures to follow during the implementation of the Oklahoma Salmonella Performance Standards Sampling Program. During 2011 FSIS discontinued the sampling of red meat carcasses for Salmonella Performance Standards. The Oklahoma MPI Program will also discontinue this practice. It cancels MPI Notice 604. II. CANCELLATION OK MPI Notice 604 III. REFERENCES 9 CFR 310.25(b); 381.94(b); and Part 417 FSIS Directive 10,230.5, Amend 1 OK MPI Notices 601, Revision 1; 602, Revision 1; 603, Revision 1; and 605, Revision 1 IV. BACKGROUND The Pathogen Reduction and Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) final rule established pathogen reduction standards for Salmonella in raw meat and poultry products. The Salmonella performance standards are based on the nationwide prevalence of Salmonella, as determined by the FSIS Nationwide Microbiological Baseline Data Collection Programs and FSIS Ground Product Microbiological Surveys. To verify that establishments are meeting the standards, the Oklahoma MPI Program collects raw meat and poultry product samples from establishments and tests the products for the presence of Salmonella. All positive Salmonella isolates will be submitted to the Oklahoma State Department of Health Laboratory where they will be subtyped (or fingerprinted ) and entered into the PulseNet database. V. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS The Oklahoma Salmonella Performance Standards Sampling program utilizes smaller sample sets than those used by FSIS, but does not exempt infrequent producers. This AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER AND PROVIDER

allows our program to have a more representative indication of the adequacy of Food Safety Systems in all of our inspected plants than if we used larger sample sets and exempted infrequent producers. These smaller sample set sizes meet the 80% probability used by FSIS when the sample set size requirements for this program were established. Refer to Attachment 1 of this Notice for the smaller sample set sizes and the rationale for their use. Samples are taken in sets and the results of an entire set are used to determine if an establishment is meeting the performance standards. The criteria for the determination of an establishment meeting or failing to meet the Salmonella performance standards is based on whether or not a set passes, not on individual sample results. The Oklahoma MPI sample set size for ground beef products is eleven (11) with one positive sample allowed per set. The use of this sample set criteria, results in an 80.3% probability of passing when operating at the performance standard. NOTE: This program is to be implemented only in establishments that are producing on average over 1,000 pounds of ground beef product per day. The establishments that are producing less than 1,000 pounds of ground beef products per day will be sampled as described by the instructions in OK MPI Notice 605, Revision 1. The pathogen reduction performance standard applies to establishments, not to individual products. Products are not tested to determine their disposition, but rather to measure the effectiveness of the slaughter and grinding process in limiting Salmonella contamination. Establishments do not have to hold product or recall product based on the results of the Salmonella samples. VI. SAMPLE COLLECTION The collection of samples in establishments by inspection personnel is a significant priority. The success of the sampling program is largely dependent on inspection personnel who accurately follow prescribed aseptic sampling techniques. The self-instruction guidebook, Salmonella Analysis Collecting Raw Meat and Poultry Samples, issued in FSIS Directive 10,230.5, Amend 1 and the video, Sampling Raw Meat and Poultry for Salmonella, provide information inspection personnel need to complete sample collection procedures. All ground beef product Salmonella performance standards samples must consist of at least 4 oz. of product. These samples must be randomly collected in an aseptic manner using the supplies provided for this purpose. Ground beef products will only be sampled for Salmonella if the product leaves the establishment in the raw state. Inspection personnel are to randomly collect Salmonella performance standards samples throughout the year when the targeted product is available. This will 2

demonstrate if there are seasonal variations in the presence of Salmonella at the establishment. The collection of Salmonella Performance Standards samples will not be scheduled by the Oklahoma City Office, but will be determined by in-plant inspection personnel or their supervisors. This determination will be based on the availability of the class/species of product being sampled in the current set and the possibility for the sample to reach the laboratory within the time frames described in Part VII of this Notice. Salmonella sampling is a directed sampling procedure. It should be documented as an unscheduled 05A03 procedure on the procedure schedule and recorded as performed. A copy of the Salmonella performance standards sample results is to be completed by the inspector and maintained in the state files in each establishment subject to this sampling program. Form FSD-MIS 7 (Revised 2/2007) TEST CHART FOR SALMONELLA PERFOMANCE STANDARDS (See Attachment 2) is to be used to document the results of the Salmonella performance standards samples. A sample set is to consist of samples of the same species/class of product until the sample set has been completed. If the species/product is not available, do not substitute a different species/class of product. If production of the species/class of product being sampled for the current Salmonella Performance Standards sample set has been discontinued by the establishment, inspection personnel are to notify their supervisor. VII. SHIPMENT OF SAMPLES A completed Form FSD-MIS 222, Laboratory Analysis must accompany each Salmonella performance standards sample submitted to the ODAFF Laboratory. The unique information that must be included on this form with all Salmonella Performance Standards samples submitted to the laboratory for analysis is as follows: General Information Include the time the sample was collected Nature of the Request Check the Salmonella Performance Standards box Nature of the Request Include the sample number of the current set (i.e. Salmonella Performance #1) All Salmonella performance standards samples must be shipped or hand delivered to arrive at the laboratory no later than 36 hours after collection of the sample and prior to noon on Wednesday. Do not submit samples to the laboratory on a week where a holiday or other situation would not allow the laboratory 48 hours from the time they receive the sample, to complete the analysis of the sample before the close of business Friday. 3

After they are collected, samples need to be maintained at refrigeration temperatures, then, shipped refrigerated via FedEx Priority Overnight to the ODAFF Oklahoma City Laboratory. Samples placed in the shipping container should not be allowed to directly contact the frozen gel-ice pack. Frozen samples, samples that are too warm or that arrive at the laboratory more than 36 hours after collection are not considered valid and will not be analyzed. Note: Additional instructions for the collection and shipment of laboratory samples is provided in OK MPI Notices 601, Revision 1, 602, Revision 1; 603, Revision 1; and 605 Revision 1. VIII. SALMONELLA SET FAILURES FSIS has adopted pathogen reduction performance standards for Salmonella to verify that plant HACCP systems are effectively reducing contamination with this microorganism. FSIS believes that the production of raw meat and poultry with Salmonella prevalence below the current national level is readily achievable with available technology and production methods. When a set fails, the State Director of the ODAFF MPI Program may determine that an Enforcement, Analysis and Investigation Officer (EIAO) should conduct a Food Safety Assessment (FSA) at that establishment since its controls are questionable. If an establishment implements corrective actions, the State Director may determine that another Salmonella performance standards sample set should be collected. No further actions are required by in-plant inspection personnel until instructions are received through supervisory channels. Any questions about this notice should be referred through normal supervisory channels Stan Stromberg Director, Food Safety Division DISTRIBUTION: All MPI Personnel ODAFF Laboratory SUBJECT CATEGORY: Laboratory 4

Attachment 1 Salmonella Sampling Plans for Ground Product Performance Size of Number Positives Pr(Pass) at Product Standard (%) Sample Set (n) Allowed (c) Standard(%) Ground 7.5 53 5 79.5 Beef 42 4 79.5 31 3 80.0 21 2 79.4 11 1 80.3 Ground 44.6 53 26 78.6 Chicken 40 20 80.2 32 16 78.6 24 12 77.0 16 12 75.5 Ground 49.9 53 29 79.9 Turkey 38 21 79.5 23 13 80.0 14 8 79.0 NOTE: (n, c) pairs are chosen to give approximately 80% chance of obtaining c or fewer positive results in a random sample of n carcasses from a process operating at the performance standard. The percent in the last column is the actual probability of passing (observing c or less positive results in n test) when operating at the performance standard. Because n and c must be whole numbers, an exact 80% probability could not be achieved in most cases. See page 38847 Determining Compliance With the Standard - of the Pathogen Reduction; Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) Systems; Final Rule, Thursday July 25, 1996 for the rationale for choosing 80% as the chance of passing at the performance standard. 5

Attachment 2 TEST CHART FOR SALMONELLA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Year Establishment Name Est. # Product Tested Control Range: 11 for Ground Beef & Hamburger; 22 for Carcass Swabs Test # FIRST SAMPLE SET SECOND SAMPLE SET THIRD SAMPLE SET Date Sample Collected Test Results (Neg. - Pos.) Test # Date Sample Collected Test Results (Neg. - Pos.) Test # Date Sample Collected Test Results (Neg. - Pos.) 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 8 8 9 9 9 10 10 10 11 11 11 12 12 12 13 13 13 14 14 14 15 15 15 16 16 16 17 17 17 18 18 18 19 19 19 20 20 20 21 21 21 22 22 22 The current Performance Standard for Ground Beef allows one (1) Positive result per eleven (11) samples. The current Performance Standard for Carcass Swabs allows zero (0) Positive result per twenty-two (22) samples. FSD-MIS 7 (Revised 2/2007) 6