Sustainability of the Food System - Public Consultation

Similar documents
CAP CONTEXT INDICATORS

CAP CONTEXT INDICATORS

I) Background information. 1. Age

CAP CONTEXT INDICATORS

Performance of Rural Development Programmes of the period - Your Voice

European Commission. Communication on Support Schemes for electricity from renewable energy sources

Relating to the transnational hiring-out of workers in the framework of the provision of services

Publishing date: 07/02/2018. We appreciate your feedback. Share this document

The EU Renewable Energy Framework for Biogas. Giulio Volpi Renewable Energy and CCS Unit DG Energy, European Commission

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document

CAP CONTEXT INDICATORS

Flash Eurobarometer 426. SMEs, Resource Efficiency and Green Markets

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Phosphorus Regulations in Europe

ATTITUDES TOWARDS BIODIVERSITY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

National action plans Prospects and requirements for the new renewables action plans in Italy

Excessive Deficit Procedure Statistics Working Group

Core projects and scientific studies as background for the NREAPs. 9th Inter-Parliamentary Meeting on Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency

Public consultation on enhanced cooperation between Public Employment Services (PES)

Unbundling and Regulatory Bodies in the context of the recast of the 1 st railway package

The Renewable Energy Directive the role of National Renewable Energy Action Plans in reaching the 2020 targets

Integration of Digital Technology. Digital Economy and Society Index Report 2018 Integration of Digital Technologies 1

Introduction to Solid Waste Management and Legal framework in the European Union

Attitudes of Europeans towards resource efficiency. Analytical report

Reforming, or transforming, Common Agricultural Policy?

CAP CONTEXT INDICATORS

E U R O P E A N U N I O N

ANNUAL PUBLICATION: detailed data. VOLUME OF EXPORTS FELL BY 4,7 PER CENT IN 2015 Export prices rose 0,7 per cent. 24 March 2016

H Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)

Summer 2009 ozone report (preliminary results)

PATTERNS OF THE AGRICULTURAL INCOME AND IMPACT OF STRUCTURAL CHANGES POST-ENLARGEMENT AMONG EU STATES

ATTITUDES OF EUROPEANS TOWARDS AIR QUALITY

Making the Parcel Regulation work. 17th Königswinter Postal Seminar 5-7 February

The interactions of complementary policies with a GHG cap and trade program: the case of Europe

REVIEW OF ECONOMIC GROWTH FACTORS OF RURAL AREAS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Summary Report on Status of implementation of the INSPIRE Based on 2016 Member States Reports

Sustainability criteria for solid biomass in large scalepower plants

H Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)

Brief on agricultural biomass production 1

energy in figures Energy

Flexicurity and Strategic Management in. HRWG, Malmö, 17 November Public Administration Herma Kuperus EIPA

Europeans attitudes towards animal cloning

State of play of CAP measure Agri-environment payments in the European Union

Farm structures. This document does not necessarily represent the official views of the European Commission

ERGP (14) 24 report on QoS and end-user satisfaction ERGP REPORT 2014 ON THE QUALITY OF SERVICE AND END-USER SATISFACTION

ESF Ex-Post evaluation

Prepared for: IGD 2014

Annex 2: Assess the efficiency rates in function of environmental and climatic conditions and agricultural practices

ISSN energy. in figures. Energy

Special Eurobarometer 456. Summary. Chemical safety

Trends in waste generation and management in Europe. Özgür Saki European Environment Agency

Best practices in implementing the Packaging Waste Directive to maximize efficient collection and recycling

Farm Economics brief

Official Journal of the European Union L 153/9

INNOVATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: ITS PERCEPTION IN AND IMPACT ON BUSINESS

Excessive Deficit Procedure Statistics Working Group

Work life balance as a factor of gender equality which perspective? Some findings from the European Working Conditions Survey

ERGP REPORT ON CORE INDICATORS FOR MONITORING THE EUROPEAN POSTAL MARKET

Workshop on developed country targets. Bangkok, 3 April EU contribution

18 EU Member States adopted a ban** (AT, BE, DE, DK, EE, FI, FR, HU, HR, LT, LU, NL, PL, RO, SE, SL, SK, UK), as well as Norway and Switzerland.

Stakeholder consultation on the mid-term review of the 2011 White Paper on transport

Flash Eurobarometer on water. Analytical report

SHIPMENTS TO ALL COUNTRIES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Pig farming in the European Union: considerable variations from one Member State to another

Developments on Waste to Energy across Europe

Retailers attitudes towards cross-border trade and consumer protection 2016

The European Commission s science and knowledge service. Scene-setter on jobs and growth in EU agri-food sector. Joint Research Centre

Response charts for 'Quality Framework for Traineeships'

ENERGY AUDITS (AND ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS) UNDER THE EED

Emissions Trading System (ETS): The UK needs to deliver its share of the total EU ETS emissions reduction of 21% by 2020, compared to 2005;

ATTITUDES OF EUROPEANS TOWARDS WASTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCE EFFICIENCY

Consumers' attitudes towards cross-border trade and consumer protection 2016

Food Bank: A tool for addressing food insecurity and food waste in Greece

Small Districts with Open Ballots:

Non-technical Innovations Definition, Measurement & Policy Implications. The new service economy: growth and implications for service innovation

Europe s water in figures

EU agricultural income 2014 first estimates

Frequently Asked Questions on E-commerce in the European Union Eurobarometer results

Role of the trade unions in the protection and interest representation of employees in Europe

Public consultation on reducing marine litter: actions on single use plastics and fishing gear

The European Commission s strategy on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) : achievements, shortcomings and future challenges

ERGP (12) 32 - Report on indicators on postal market ERGP REPORT ON INDICATORS ON POSTAL MARKET

NEGOTIATING THE NEW WORLD OF WORK WHAT ROLE FOR COLLECTIVE BARGAINING?

Public Consultation On the Review of Annexes I and II of the Groundwater Directive

RETAILERS ATTITUDES TOWARDS CROSS- BORDER TRADE AND CONSUMER PROTECTION

Public Consultation (Questionnaire): Quality of Drinking Water in the EU. Key Contact: Marc Stutter

Exploring the wide dispersion in productivity among European firms

The European Commission s strategy on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) : achievements, shortcomings and future challenges

Radioactive waste. Fieldwork : February- March 2005 Publication : September 2005

Modernising and simplifying the CAP

Use of Internet Use of Internet Services by Citizens in the EU

Bioenergy development in Finland and EU: Fatcors affecting the future development

Ozone Directive: reporting summer data 2007

Study on Employment, Growth and Innovation in Rural Areas (SEGIRA)

Authors: Jannick H. Schmidt, 2.-0 LCA consultants

Flash Eurobarometer 426. Summary

Europeans attitudes towards animal cloning. Analytical Report

HORIZON Spreading Excellence and Widening Participation. Twinning Info day. Telemachos TELEMACHOU Policy Officer Tel-Aviv, 28 February 2017

Biogas from Co-Fermentation of Biowaste at a Waste Water Treatment Plant

Transcription:

Sustainability of the Food System - Public Consultation The aim of this consultation is to identify and assess policies and initiatives that could help make the production and consumption of food more sustainable. Please read the associated web-page before responding to the questionnaire. Only a few of the questions are compulsory so please feel free to answer only those relevant to you. The consultation will remain open until the 1 October 2013. Please note: once you start filling in this questionnaire, the maximum time allowed by the system to complete it is 90 minutes. Partial responses will not be saved. It is therefore a good idea to download the full questionnaire as a PDF and prepare your answers in advance. (it can be found on the consultation page here) Thank-you very much for taking the time to help with this consultation. Questions marked with an asterisk * require an answer to be given. 1. Information about yourself / your organisation Your full name * Your contact email address

I am replying as a...* Interested individual Farmer / fishermen Association NGO Food manufacturer Food Retailer Food service provider (restaurant / catering etc.) Academic and/or scientist Local authority National authority International body Other Please specify Please give the name of your association/organisation/authority etc. (if appropriate) If you are providing a response on behalf of an organisation, please give the name here. Country (or countries) of you or your organisation If you are representing a association, please specify the countries represented by the membership AT - Austria BE - Belgium CY - Cyprus CZ - Czech Republic DE - Germany DK - Denmark EE - Estonia EL - Greece ES - Spain FI - Finland FR - France HU - Hungary IE - Ireland IT - Italy LT - Lithuania LU - Luxembourg LV - Latvia MT - Malta NL - Netherlands PL - Poland PT - Portugal SE - Sweden SI - Slovenia SK - Slovakia UK - United Kingdom BG - Bulgaria RO - Romania other

Please specify How would you prefer your contribution to be published on the Commission website? * Under the name indicated (I consent to publication of all information in my contribution and I declare that none of it is under copyright restrictions that prevent publication) Anonymously (I consent to publication of all information in my contribution and I declare that none of it is under copyright restrictions that prevent publication) Not at all keep it confidential (My contribution will not be published, but it will be used internally within the Commission) How well informed are you about the sustainable production and consumption of food? Very well informed Fairly well informed Not very well informed Not at all informed 2. Defining Sustainable Food There are many different definitions of 'sustainable food', and this issue often emerges as an important starting point for discussion. What do you or your organisation think? Do you / your organisation think it is important to have an agreed definition of sustainable food? Yes No Do you / does your organisation use a specific definition or specific criteria to guide your work? Yes No

What is the definition you use? Which of the following issues do you think should be considered as falling within the scope of a strategy on the sustainability of the food system? (You may select more than one) Climate change Biodiversity and natural habitats Water scarcity Toxic emission to air and water (nitrogen / phosphorus) Soil degradation Food security (which means a combination of 'food availability' - having available sufficient quantities of food on a consistent basis, and 'food access' - having sufficient resources, both economic and physical, to obtain the appropriate foods for a nutritious diet.) Food price stability / impact of excessive food price volatility Employment Economic growth Competitiveness of the EU food sector Obesity and related chronic diseases prevention Malnutrition and under-nutrition Animal welfare Fair trade Other Please specify

If you have any further comments to add on the subject of defining 'sustainable' in relation to food sustainability, please do so here. 3. Moving towards a more sustainable food system - identifying and assessing policy options The Commission has identified a number of potential actions that could be targeted for improving the sustainability of the food system. The aim of this consultation is to seek you views on how and why these actions might be prioritised and who would be best placed to take them forward. You will also be given the opportunity to propose other actions, and explain how your preferred options could be implemented. The actions fall into the following categories: 3.1 Better technical knowledge on the environmental impacts of food; 3.2 Stimulating sustainable food production; 3.3 Promoting sustainable food consumption; 3.4 Reducing food waste and losses; 3.5 Improving food policy coherence. 3.1. Better technical knowledge on the environmental impacts of food products

How effective do you think the following actions could be in improving our technical knowledge of the environmental impacts of food products? a: Very b: Fairly c: Not particularly d: Not at all e: Don't know a. Develop a standardised methodology for measuring the environmental impacts of food products. a b c d e b. Make data on the environmental impacts of food more transparent and accessible. c. Develop technical guidance on how to identify more sustainable food products d. Develop sustainability criteria for specific food products. e. Quantify in economic terms, the environmental and social costs associated with food products or diets (i.e. any hidden costs or 'externalities') Do you have any other proposals for actions aimed at improving our technical knowledge on food products? If so, please specify here.

Do you think that any specific food product categories should be prioritised for action? If so, please specify the product group and explain why this should be seen as a priorty. At what level do you think these actions would be best taken forward? a: Global b: EU c: National d: Local e: Action not needed a. Develop a standardised methodology for measuring the environmental impacts of food products. a b c d e b. Make data on the environmental impacts of food more transparent and accessible. c. Develop technical guidance on how to identify more sustainable food products d. Develop sustainability criteria for specific food products. e. Quantify in economic terms, the environmental and social costs associated with food products or diets.

For any other actions you have suggested, at what level do you think they would be best taken forward? (Global / EU / National / Local) Please give any further details of how you would implement your preferred action/s. Which out of these actions (inculding any of your suggestions) would you give the highest priority for the European Commission to take forward, and why? Do you have any quantative information concerning the benefits and costs of implementing these actions? If so, please give details here. (You may include links or upload relevant documents if you wish.) 3.2. Stimulating sustainable food production

In terms of stimulating more sustainable food production, how effective could it be to undertake actions to promote/support the following? a: Very b: Fairly c: Not particularly d: Not at all e: Don't know a. Regional, wholesale markets. a b c d e b. Seasonally produced food. c. Diversification of cultivated species. d. Productive, intensive agriculture. e. Extensive, integrated agriculture. f. Organic production. g. Sustainable sourcing of key food commodities. h. Higher animal welfare standards. Do you have any other proposals for actions aimed at helping to make food production more sustainable? If so, please specify here.

At what level do you think these actions would be best taken forward? a: Global b: EU c: National d: Local e: Producer f: Retailer g: Action not needed a. Regional, wholesale markets. a b c d e f g b. Seasonally produced food. c. Diversification of cultivated species. d. Productive, intensive agriculture. e. Extensive, integrated agriculture. f. Organic production. g. Sustainable sourcing of key food commodities. h. Higher animal welfare standards. For any other actions you have suggested, at what level do you think they would be best taken forward? (Global / EU / National / Local / Retailer / Producer)

Please give any further details of how you would implement your preferred action/s Which out of these actions (inculding any of your suggestions) would you give the highest priority for the European Commission to take forward, and why? Do you have any quantative information concerning the benefits and costs of implementing these actions? If so, please give details here. You may include links or upload relevant documents. 3.3. Promoting sustainable food consumption

In your view, how effective could the following actions be in promoting sustainable food consumption? a: very b: Fairly c: Not particularly d: Not at all e: Don't know a. Agreeing a common set of guideling principles of what constitutes 'sustainable' diet. a b c d e b. Develop ideas for food labelling schemes and/or on-package information highlighting more sustainable choices. c. Run information campaigns on the environmental impacts of different food choices. d. Promote more sustainable food choices in retail outlets by increasing their availability/accessibility. e. Assess the scope for using personal technology for accessing information, e.g. smart phone apps, bar code readers, etc f. Develop and encourage the use of Green Public Procurement guidelines, to help public bodies (or private organisations) purchase food sustainably. Do you have any other proposals for actions aimed at helping to promoting sustainable food consumption? If so, please specify here.

At what level do you think these actions would be best taken forward? a: Global b: EU c: National d: Local e: Producer f: Retailer g: Action not needed a. Agreeing a common set of guiding principles of what constitutes 'sustainable' diet. a b c d e f g b. Develop ideas for food labelling schemes and/or on-package information highlighting more sustainable choices. c. Run information campaigns on the environmental impacts of different food choices. d. Promote more sustainable food choices in retail outlets by increasing their availability/accessibility. e. Assess the scope for using personal technology for accessing information, e.g. smart phone apps, bar code readers, etc f. Develop and encourage the use of Green Public Procurement guidelines, to help public bodies (or private organisations) purchase food sustainably.

For any other actions you have suggested, at what level do you think they would be best taken forward? (Global / EU / National / Local / Retailer / Producer) Please give any further details of how you would implement your preferred action/s. Which out of these actions (inculding any of your suggestions) would you give the highest priority for the European Commission to take forward, and why? Do you have any quantative information concerning the benefits and costs of implementing these actions? If so, please give details here. You may include links or upload relevant documents. 3.4. Preventing and reducing Food Losses & Food Waste

How effective do you think the following actions could be in preventing and reducing food losses & food waste? a: Very b: Fairly c: Not particularly d: Not at all e: Don't know a. Develop/disseminate consumer information on avoiding over-purchasing. a b c d e b. Develop/disseminate consumer information on the meaning of food date labels. ('best-before', 'use-by', 'sell-by') c. Develop/disseminate consumer information on better storage of food. d. Develop/disseminate consumer information on more sustainable food of leftovers. preparation and use e. Establish new education campaigns on food waste prevention aimed at children. f. Establish new education campaigns on food waste prevention aimed at adults. g. Facilitate the exchange of good practices on food waste prevention and reduction activities at all levels: producers, retailers as well as local, regional and national authorities. h. Clarify the EU VAT Directive for donation of surplus food to food banks for Member States and businesses. i. Encourage best-practice in relation to food date labels by food business operators to minimise wastage.

j. Develop EU Food Donation Guidelines for food donors and food banks on how to comply with the EU Food Hygiene legislation (types of food suitable for donation, conditions for transport and traceability, legal liability, etc.) k. Agree a common EU definition of food waste, classifying products as food, feed or waste etc. as appropriate. l. Develop a standardised methodology for collecting and reporting data on food waste to ensure data comparability across Member States. m. Introduce reporting requirements on food waste. n. Set binding targets for food waste prevention. Do you have any other proposals for actions on preventing and reducing food losses & food waste? If so please specify here. At what level do you think these actions would be best taken forward? a: Global b: EU c: National d: Local e: Producer f: Retailer g: Action not needed a b c d e f g a. Develop/disseminate consumer information on avoiding over-purchasing.

b. Develop/disseminate consumer information on the meaning of food date labels. ('best-before', 'use-by', 'sell-by') c. Develop/disseminate consumer information on better storage of food. d. Develop/disseminate consumer information on more sustainable food of leftovers. preparation and use e. Establish new education campaigns on food waste prevention aimed at children. f. Establish new education campaigns on food waste prevention aimed at adults. g. Facilitate the exchange of good practices on food waste prevention and reduction activities at all levels: producers, retailers as well as local, regional and national authorities. h. Clarify the EU VAT Directive for donation of surplus food to food banks for Member States and businesses. i. Encourage best-practice in relation to food date labels by food business operators to minimise wastage. j. Develop EU Food Donation Guidelines for food donors and food banks on how to comply with the EU Food Hygiene legislation (types of food suitable for donation, conditions for transport and traceability, legal liability, etc.) k. Agree a common EU definition of food waste, classifying products as food, feed or waste etc. as appropriate. l. Develop a standardised methodology for collecting and reporting data on food waste to ensure data comparability across Member States. m. Introduce reporting requirements on food waste.

n. Set binding targets for food waste prevention. For any other actions you have suggested, at what level do you think they would be best taken forward? (Global / EU / National / Local / Retailer / Producer) Please give any further details of how you would implement your preferred action/s. Which out of these actions (inculding any of your suggestions) would you give the highest priority for the European Commission to take forward, and why?

Do you have any quantative information concerning the benefits and costs of implementing these actions? If so, please give details here. You may include links or upload relevant documents. Are there any key initiatives are you undertaking or that you are aware of in the area of preventing/reducing food losses and food waste that you would like to share? (these could form part of a 'best practice' reference.) Do you have economic and/or quantititve data related to food losses and food waste? If so, please provide details and/or links to you information here...(you may upload files with this question) 3.4.1. Preventing food waste and losses in developing countries

What initiatives are you already undertaking, or are you aware of, in the area of reducing food waste and losses internationally? What actions / policies do you think the EU should prioritise to help prevent food wate and losses in developing countries? 3.5. Improving food policy coherence This section looks at the overall framework in which food policy is made, rather than about the development of specific policies, and seeks your views on whether it is fit to tackle the challenge of making the food system sustainable in the future. Are we 'locked-in' to the path currently being followed by our food system? Is there a need to reconcile the competing dominant agro-industrial and the emerging integrated territorial agro-food paradigms? What sort of policy responses do these issues require from the EU? Do you think the way our food system is set up is suitable to equip it for future challenges? yes no don't know

If you would like to give more details in relation to your answer, please do so here. What do you think are the most important aspects of the food system that would need to be addressed to make it more sustainable? (such as, for example, production methods, consumption patterns, research priorities, policy framework, market set-up, etc...) Do you think there are any inconsistencies / incoherence between policies related to food production and consumption? yes no don't know Please specify. Do you think there are any regulatory, or other, barriers to sustainable food production and/or consumption? yes no don't know

Please specify. How would you propose we address any policy inconsistencies or regulatory barriers thet you have mentioned in the previous two question? Do you have examples of good practice to share that demonstrate a more sustainable approach to food system governance? (i.e. where, for example, the typcial relationship between producers, retialers, consumers, policy makers etc. has been changed somehow.) How do you think the overall governance of the food system could be adapted in order to ensure more coherent action at EU level?

In your view, how effective could the following actions be in providing better policy coherence for the production and consumption of food? a: Very b: Fairly c: Not particularly d: Not at all e: Don't know a. Perform a comprehensive review of relevant food policies (International/EU/National/local) to check that they are aligned with each other, that they are coherent, and are in line with agreed sustainability goals. (Also known as a 'fitness check') a b c d e b. Support national and local food system governance by sharing good practices / provide guidance on implementing sustainable food strategies. c. Identify environmentally harmful subsidies (EHS) in the food sector. d. Establish new coordination bodies (or reorganise existing bodies) to provide coherence on in the field of food sustainability. Do you have any other proposals for actions on improving food policy coherence?

Please give details of how you are, or would, implement your preferred option/s.