Methanol Plant Expansion for Increased Profitability

Similar documents
PEP Review METHANOL PRODUCTION VIA TOYO PROCESS By Syed N. Naqvi (December 2011) ABSTRACT

Autothermal Reforming for efficient and versatile syngas production. Esben Sorensen, Haldor Topsoe Inc. GSTC 2017 Syngas Technologies Conference

A Journey through the Forest: Navigating around the Complexities of a Methanol Project

Efficient Technologies for Down Stream Gasification Process and Integration with IGCC Power Production

Ammonia plants. Flexible solutions for all feedstocks.

THE MERITS OF HEAVY RESIDUE GASIFICATION IN TODAY S WORLD

Keywords: GTL, Fisher-Tropsch, natural gas, synthesis gas, steam reforming NCPO, auto-thermal reforming. UNESCO EOLSS

HYDROGEN GENERATION FOR MODERN REFINERIES

POXSYN A Novel Approach for Syngas to Chemicals Production

The Low Cost Gas Era Gasification versus Steam Reforming - a True Alternative?

AEC Project Execution Using GRID vgpu Enhanced Virtualization

Dealing with Gas Pains in Offshore Oilfield Developments

Optimal design of coal gasifiers in combination with sour shift

METHANOL CASALE AND FOSTER WHEELER: JOINING FORCES FOR THE METHANOL MARKET

Modular GTL Industry Approved & Operating

Methanol Production by Gasification of Heavy Residues

Molten Salt Gasification for Hydrogen Production

ENHANCING METHANOL CAPACITY WITH TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION. Jim Loney October 17, 2017 Gasification & Syngas Technologies Conference

Available online at Energy Procedia 1 (2009) (2008) GHGT-9. Sandra Heimel a *, Cliff Lowe a

Reducing the Carbon Intensity of Methanol for Use as a Transport Fuel

METHANOL AND DERIVATIVES PROVEN TECHNOLOGIES FOR OPTIMAL PRODUCTION

CO 2 Capture from Steam Methane Reformers: Commercial Scale Demonstration Project

Minimizing associated gas flaring with smaller scale methanol production

Mk Plus The Next Generation Lurgi FBDB Gasification. Leipzig, 22/05/2012 Dr. Henrik Timmermann

Hydrogen is a particularly

Turning Engineering Excellence into Engineering Excellence³. The perfect answer to the new world wide challenges in EPC Contracting

CO 2 recovery from industrial hydrogen facilities and steel production to comply with future European Emission regulations

Successful Sulfur Control & Hydrogen Purification at Saras World-Scale IGCC Plant

Insert flexibility into your hydrogen network Part 2

An Opportunity for Methanol; the Production Starting from Coal

The Life Cycle Assessment of CO 2 capture and geological storage in energy production

Synthesis Gas Production from Biomass

1. Process Description:

Real title. Unlocking Remote Oilfield Development. 21 st World Upstream Conference 19 th 21 st September 2011 GENEVA

UOP Selexol TM Technology Applications for CO 2 Capture

Real title. Unlocking Remote Oilfield Development. SMi Gas to Liquids Conference 25 th 26 th October 2011 LONDON

Efficiency analysis for the production of modern energy carriers from renewable resources and wastes

PERP Program New Report Alert

DME as a carrier of Renewable Energy

Analysis of flexibility options for electricity generating projects with pre-combustion capture of CO 2

Prospect of the Nuclear-Heated Steam Methane Reforming (NH-SMR) Method for Fertilizers Industry In Indonesia

Industrial Solutions. Methanol plants. How you profit from our one-stop shop

OPPORTUNITIES CREATED BY THE INNOVATIVE REVAMPING OF A METHANOL PLANT. Davide Carrara

SPE MS. Gas to Liquids: Beyond Fischer Tropsch Philip E. Lewis, SPE, ZEEP Ltd. Abstract

Engineers India Limited Multi product generation from Coal via gasification

Hydrogen Recovery by Pressure Swing Adsorption

Reforming Natural Gas for CO 2 pre-combustion capture in Combined Cycle power plant

Industrial Solutions. Ammonia technology. Boost your business with our leading fertilizer technology

PRISM Membrane Systems for petrochemical applications... tell me more

Synthesis Gas Processes for Synfuels Production

Process Economics Program

Shale Gas as an Alternative Petrochemical Feedstock

Process description The Johnson Matthey/BP fixed-bed FT technology comprises a series of reaction vessels charged with a proprietary BP catalyst.

Petroleum Coke Gasification Sweeny E-GasE. Gas Project

WORLDWIDE PLANT SOLUTIONS

Topsøe hydrogen technology energy efficient and flexible solutions

GoBiGas a First-of-a-kind-plant

Entrained-flow gasification to convert biomass into synthesis gas

Integrated processes for converting coal to chemicals and fuels. Maninder Jit Singh Haldor Topsøe

Commercial Application of BGL Gasifiers M. Olschar, H. Hirschfelder, W. F. Staab, A. R. Williams (GL)

Nuclear Hydrogen for Production of Liquid Hydrocarbon Transport Fuels

Preliminary Assessment of Energy and GHG Emissions of Ammonia to H2 for Fuel Cell Vehicle Applications

Canadian Clean Power Coalition: Clean Coal-Fired Power Plant Technology To Address Climate Change Concerns

Evaluation of Hydrogen Production at Refineries in China. The new UOP SeparALL TM Process. Bart Beuckels, UOP NV

Chemical Looping Gasification Sulfur By-Product

Production of Electricity and/or Fuels from Biomass by Thermochemical Conversion

VESTA a Novel SNG Technology

FT-GTL UNLOCKS VALUE FROM NATURAL GAS

KBR Ammonia Technologies Improve Production Cost, Reliability, and Efficiency

Fertilizer Industry Roundtable November 12, By David J. Beecy. Dale Simbeck, Vice President, Technology SFA Pacific, Inc.

Lurgi s MPG Gasification plus Rectisol Gas Purification Advanced Process Combination for Reliable Syngas Production

Methanol - One Product - Many Possibilities

Scaling Down Ammonia Production Modular solutions for constructability. Carrie Lalou Linde Engineering North America October 16, 2017

PERP/PERP ABSTRACTS Carbon Monoxide PERP 09/10S11

GTL. and Edited and Revised 2016 by H M Fahmy

U.S. Liquid Transport Fuels

CASALE COAL-BASED METHANOL SYNLOOPS

Producing Liquid Fuels from Coal

Rectisol Wash Units Acid Gas Removal for Polygeneration Concepts downstream Gasification

Potential for Nuclear Process Heat Application

Capital Markets Days 2014 Workshop Linde Engineering

Feasibility Study of Production of Methanol and Dimethyl Ether from Flare Gas. Abstract

Biobased materials and fuels via methanol The role of integration

Founded in 1953, Heurtey Petrochem is an international oil and gas engineering g Group

Purge gas recovery. High-quality, customised solutions for the recovery of valuable gases from ammonia synthesis purge streams.

Customizing Syngas Specifications with E-Gas Technology Gasifier

Coal to Olefins Processes

Hydrogen Separation Membrane Applications

Green is Seen in Fertilizers Municipal Solid Waste Management. Carrie Farberow Kevin Bailey University of Oklahoma May 1, 2007

Smart CHP from Biomass and Waste

Haldor Topsoe Making hydrogen with different feeds and technologies

2013 Instituto Petroquímico Argentino (IPA) Conference 09 October 2013 Buenos Aires, Argentina

CCS and CCU. their Role in the Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Energy Intensive Industry

COMPETITIVENESS OF GASIFICATION AT THE BULWER ISLAND, AUSTRALIA REFINERY

Latest on CO 2 Capture Technology

Production and Utilization of Green Hydrogen. Mathias Mostertz GAFOE Meeting, April 27, 2013

Balancing Hydrogen Demand and Production: Optimising the Lifeblood of a Refinery Luigi Bressan Director of Process and Technology Foster Wheeler

Current Review of DOE s Syngas Technology Development Jai-woh Kim, Dave Lyons and Regis Conrad United States Department of Energy, USA

THE ASSESSMENT OF A WATER-CYCLE FOR CAPTURE OF CO2

Study of the Feasibility of a Coal-to-Liquids Plant in Interior Alaska

Transcription:

Plant Expansion for Increased Profitability Andrew Board October 2016 Andrew.Board@Jacobs.com www.jacobs.com worldwide

120 Years of Syngas Experience The First 100 Years 1892 Humphreys & Glasgow founded. 1916 First Hydrogen Plant 1944 First Producer Gas Plant 1951 First Onia Geigy Plant 1956 Underground Coal Gasification 1957 First Syngas Plant for Fischer-Tropsch 1958 First Gasification Plant 1962 First Reformer 1963 First Ammonia Plant 1965 First Plant 1971 First Refinery Plant First SNG Plant 1972 First Offshore Design 1992 Jacobs Acquires H&G 2

Experience Global Client Location Scope Togliattiazot Salalah Company (SMC) Saudi International Petrochemical Company (SIPC) QAFAC Saudi Company Ar-Razi 3 & Ar-Razi 4 National Company Ibn Sina Samara, Russia Salalah, Oman Al Jubail, Saudi Arabia Qatar Al Jubail, Saudi Arabia Al Jubail, Saudi Arabia Basic Engineering Package & Reformer Detailed Design for 2 x 3,300 TPD methanol plants to be located on Togliattiazot s existing complex. Loop design included JM s tube cooled converter. FEED package and an ITB for LSTK EPCC bids for a grass roots 3,000 TPD methanol plant. OSBL design included docks and seawater intake / outfall. FEED package for a 2,900 TPD methanol plant. Jacobs monitored the turnkey contractor and provided operator training, plant commissioning for SIPC. FEED package, commissioning and start-up assistance for a 2,500 TPD methanol plant. Basic and Detailed Engineering for SMR for 2,500 TPD methanol plant. Detailed engineering of the reformer furnace, convection heat recovery section, and ancillary equipment for a 2,100 TPD methanol plant. Also provided construction and commissioning advisory services.

Experience North America Client Location Scope Methanex Geismar, LA PDP, FEED, permitting and EPCm for relocation of 2 X 2,860 TPD plants from Punta Arenas, Chile to Geismar, LA. Methanex LyondellBasell Celanese Medicine Hat Channelview, TX Edmonton, Canada Basic Engineering for distillation upgrade and integration. NOx emission reduction study. Provide basic engineering support and EPCm services for the 2,125 TPD Channelview Restart and Emission Reduction Project. Basic Engineering for methanol plant and Detailed Engineering for SMR for 2,100 TPD methanol plant. 4

Conventional SMR based Plant - 1 NG to SMR Fuel Steam Purge gas to SMR Fuel Natural Gas NG Compression Purification and Saturation Steam Methane Reforming (SMR) Heat Recovery and Syngas Compressor (SGC) Synthesis Loop Distillation Product CH 4 + H 2 O CO + 3H 2 CO + H 2 O CO 2 + H 2 CO 2 + 3H 2 CH 3 OH + H 2 O CO + H 2 O CO 2 + H 2 Combing to give overall reaction: CO + 2H 2 CH 3 OH Water 5

Conventional SMR based Plant - 2 Conventional Natural Gas SMR based methanol plants provide good reliable low cost operation for methanol production Not the most efficient in terms of energy consumption, typically between 33 and 36 MMBtu/MT (HHV) Plant operation leads to an excess of hydrogen in the methanol synthesis loop, which is purged and burnt as fuel in SMR Is there a better use for this hydrogen? 6

CO 2 injection Option 1 NG to SMR Fuel Steam Purge gas to SMR Fuel Natural Gas NG Compression Purification and Saturation Steam Methane Reforming (SMR) Heat Recovery and Syngas Compressor (SGC) Synthesis Loop Distillation Product CO 2 injection CO 2 injection Water CO 2 injection up to stoichiometry level However, as CO 2 injection increases, rate of production increase and efficiency improvement decreases Distillation impacts needs assessment due to increase load and greater water produced in synthesis reactions 7

CO 2 injection Option 1 Total Natural Gas Units Base Case Current operation Option 1a CO2 injection to SGC Option 1b CO2 injection to SMR MMBtu/day 105,604 105,604 105,604 113,712 CO 2 Injected TPD 0 724 724 824 Option 1c CO2 injection to SGC with increased NG Production Natural Gas Utilization MTPD 3,000 3,083 3,098 3,299 MMBtu/MT 35.20 34.25 34.09 34.47 8

Purge Loop Option 2 Purge gas to SMR Fuel PSA tailgas to SMR Fuel High Pressure PSA Purge Loop NG to SMR Fuel Steam CO 2 injection Natural Gas NG Compression Purification and Saturation Steam Methane Reforming (SMR) Heat Recovery and Syngas Compressor (SGC) Synthesis Loop Distillation Product Water 9

Purge Loop Option 2 Units Base Case Current operation Option 2a Purge Loop with fixed NG Total Natural Gas MMBtu/day 105,604 105,604 126,555 CO 2 Injected TPD 0 929 1,209 Production MTPD 3,000 3,180 3,825 Option 2b Purge Loop with increased NG Natural Gas Utilization MMBtu/MT 35.20 33.21 33.08 10

ATR and OTR Option 3 Oxygen Natural Gas Auto Thermal Reforming (ATR) and Reformed Gas Boilers Once-Through Reactor (OTR) NG to SMR Fuel Steam Purge gas to SMR Fuel Natural Gas NG Compression Purification and Saturation Steam Methane Reforming (SMR) Heat Recovery and Syngas Compressor (SGC) Synthesis Loop Distillation Product CO 2 injection Water 11

ATR and OTR Option 3 Units Base Case Current operation Total Natural Gas MMBtu/day 105,604 138,626 CO 2 Injected TPD 0 824 O 2 Consumed TPD 0 457 Production MTPD 3,000 4,173 Natural Gas Utilization MMBtu/MT 35.20 33.22 Option 3 ATR and OTR 12

TIC/annualized production ($/TPA) Additional Production (TPD) Financial impact 800 1400 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Option 1a CO2 injection to SGC Option 1b CO2 injection to SMR Option 1c CO2 injection to SGC with increased NG Option 2a Purge loop with fixed NG Option 2b Purge loop with increased NG Option 3 ATR and OTR 0 TIC/Annualized Production Additional Production 13

Case Study Implementation of Option 3 plant implementing parallel ATR and OTR with ~20% increase in Natural Gas and CO 2 addition Oxygen Natural Gas Auto Thermal Reforming (ATR) and Reformed Gas Boilers Once-Through Reactor (OTR) NG to SMR Fuel Steam Purge gas to SMR Fuel Natural Gas NG Compression Purification and Saturation Steam Methane Reforming (SMR) Heat Recovery and Syngas Compressor (SGC) Synthesis Loop Distillation Product CO 2 injection Water 14

Case Study Implementation of Option 3 Plant Capacity increased from 3,300 TPD to 4,400 TPD Natural Gas increase approximately 20%, maximum CO 2 injection plant improvement in Natural Gas utilization from 36 to 32.7 MMBtu/day plant now an exporter of steam to other users Project status FEED Completed by Jacobs EPC awarded 15

Disclaimer Important The material in this presentation has been prepared by Jacobs. Copyright and other intellectual property rights in this presentation vest exclusively with Jacobs. Apart from any use permitted under applicable copyright legislation, no part of this work may in any form or by any means (electronic, graphic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) be reproduced, copied, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without prior written permission. Jacobs is a trademark of Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 2015 Copyright 2015 Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. All rights reserved. 16