SUMMARY OF VARIABLE NON-FUEL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ( O&M ) COSTS

Similar documents
Evaporative Gas Cooling and Emissions Control Solutions

Taravosh Jam Design & Engineering Co.

Energy Production Systems Engineering

Managing the Catalysts of a Combustion Turbine Fleet

High-Efficiency Integrated Solid Wasteto-Energy

Kazushige KUROSAWA*, Zhibao ZHANG**, and Zhengbing WANG** [Delivered Products & Systems] 1. Introduction. 2. Overview of Nanjing

Worldwide Pollution Control Association. August 3-4, 2010

NEW TECHNOLOGIES IN COAL-FIRED THERMAL POWER PLANTS FOR MORE EFFECTIVE WORK WITH LESS POLLUTION

Post-Combustion NOx Control - Program 73

Acid Gas Control Systems. Spray-Dry Scrubbers and Dry Injection Systems. United McGill products. a McGill AirClean product

TECHNOLOGIES for SO 2 and ACID GAS CONTROL

Field trip to Arnoldstein WTE facility Arnoldstein, Austria, December 19, by Werner Sunk

Control Device Technology

Pre-Combustion Technology for Coal-fired Power Plants

New 790-Megawatt Unit. Council Bluffs Energy Center

Post Combustion CO 2 Capture Scale Up Study

DRY HYDRATED LIME INJECTION FOR COAL-FIRED BOILER FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION (FGD) FOREWORD

TRASH BURNING F 32 CLEAN POWER FROM COVER STORY

High Bridge Combined Cycle Plant

NPDES COMPLIANCE OF COOLING TOWERS BLOWDOWN AT POWER PLANTS WITH RECLAIMED WATER AS SOURCE WATER

TruePeak TDLS200. NH 3 Slip Measurement. <Document Number> Copyright Yokogawa Electric Corporation <date/time>

PPC specializes in maximum efficiency air pollution control equipment using a variety of different

Clean Coal Technology

POWER PLANT AIR QUALITY CONTROL and FLY ASH QUALITY & AVAILABILITY

Drying of High-Moisture Coals For Power Production & Gasification

FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION FOR 2 X 6 MW COAL FIRED POWER PLANT

Emissions Control Project

Mercury and SO3 Mitigation Issues for Scrubber Technology

Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)

The Role of Engineering Simulation in Clean Coal Technologies

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

Cory Environmental. Riverside Resource Recovery Facility

BIOGAS CLEAN-UP TECHNOLOGIES

SCR for NO x Control in Coal-fired Power Plants

CEE 452/652. Week 14, Lecture 1 NOx control. Dr. Dave DuBois Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Desert Research Institute

Advanced Coal Power Plant Water Usage

ECO2 LINCS LTD SLEAFORD RENEWABLE ENERGY PLANT IPPC APPLICATION - NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY

DOW Ultrafiltration. Case History. DOW Ultrafiltration Modules Protect Reverse Osmosis System from High Iron

News. Power Generation 11. ph Control Reduces Acid Consumption in Neutralization Process up to 90 % Perspectives in Pure Water Analytics THORNTON

G.T. Bielawski J.B. Rogan D.K. McDonald The Babcock & Wilcox Company Barberton, Ohio, U.S.A.

Flue Gas Desulfurization Theory & Operation

Lesson 5. Industrial Applications of ESPs. Goal. Objectives. Introduction. Boilers. Particulate Matter Control System

Flue Gas Desulfurization Theory & Operation

Flue Gas Desulfurization Theory & Operation

Customized Solutions for Environmental Compliance. Combining proven experience, technology and reliable performance for our customers

State of the Art (SOTA) Manual for Stationary Gas Turbines

Repowering Conventional Coal Plants with Texaco Gasification: The Environmental and Economic Solution

Wastewater Treatment and Zero Liquid Discharge Technologies: Overview and New Developments Gordon Maller URS Process Technologies, Austin, TX

Omya Water & Energy omya.com. Flue Gas Cleaning. Sustainable and efficient flue gas desulfurization (FGD)

The Value Proposition of Circulating Fluidized Bed Scrubbing Technology. Robert Giglio Foster Wheeler Global Power Group

Cory Riverside Energy. Riverside Resource Recovery Facility

Borregaard Case Study. Sarpsborg I & II

Heat and electricity from waste Sysav s waste-to-energy plant

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

SOME ENERGY-EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGIES IN JAPAN

Refuse-to-Energy Facility

Biomass Boiler Emission Abatement Technologies. Simon Wakefield

Treatment Technologies

Thermal Oxidation plants February 2016

BOILER FEED WATER AND ITS TREATMENTS

Can your unit pass a Particulate Emission Compliance Test?

Flue Gas Desulfurization Theory & Operation

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING 343

nat Presentation Title ( Arial, Font size 28 ) Control of Sulphur Dioxide, Oxides of Nitrogen and Mercury Date, Venue, etc..( Arial, Font size 18 )

MARAMA Webinar August 7, Angelos Kokkinos Chief Technology Officer Babcock Power, Inc.

Up gradation of Boilers to Implement New Pollution Norms

1) ABSORPTION The removal of one or more selected components from a gas mixture by absorption is probably the most important operation in the control

Development status of the EAGLE Gasification Pilot Plant

IMPLEMENTATION OF EMISSION GUIDELINES FOR LARGE MWCS THE STATUS OF EMISSIONS REDUCTION

Steam Cycle Chemistry in Air-Cooled Condensers. NV Energy ACC User s Group * November 12-13, 2009 Andrew Howell * Xcel Energy

Control of sulfidity in a modern kraft pulp mill

Duke Energy Seminar September 3 5, 2008 Concord, NC

Warning. Chlorine Gas (Cl 2 ) Chlorine gas production

CCGT/HRSG Water Chemistry

CCGT/HRSG Water Chemistry

Evaporative Condenser Passivation. Cameron Klein Strand Associates, Inc.

Cory Environmental. Riverside Resource Recovery Facility

Sorbents Evaluation Testing Facilities. 95% removal efficiency or an emission standard of lbs/gw h by 2012, while

MEGA Dynamic Control of DSI for SO3 Management ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

LECTURE 5 ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY. ECE 371 Sustainable Energy Systems

SCR Control Strategy and CEMS for an Ultra-Low NO x Emitter

BELTRAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Process gas cleanup from Coal and Municipal Gasification. By Duane S Abbott Beltran Technologies, Inc.

Incineration (energy recovery through complete oxidation) Mass Burn Refuse Derived Fuel Pyrolysis Gasification

Combined Cycle Users Group: Trends in Power Plant Chemistry, Water, and Wastewater

FOSSIL POWER PLANT WATER TREATMENT. Generating optimal performance, powered by Dow.

The Projected Impacts of the Clean Air Interstate Rule on Electricity Prices in Indiana

Optimizing Steam and Cooling Systems for Reliability and Sustainability. Presented By: Kevin Emery

AIR PERMITTING CASE STUDY: HARVARD S CHP EXPANSION

Questionnaire (Conventional Energy)

For Condensing Economizers ENBRIDGE MAY Topics

Guide to Low-Emission Boiler and Combustion Equipment Selection

Module 4 : Hydrogen gas. Lecture 29 : Hydrogen gas

The Cost of Mercury Removal in an IGCC Plant

Enhancing Capacity Empowering Nation. Technological Parameters in selecting systems to control emissions in Thermal Power Plants

Air Pollution Control For

Gasification Combined Cycles 101. Dr. Jeff Phillips EPRI

Training Fees 3300 US$ per participant for Public Training includes Materials/Handouts, tea/coffee breaks, refreshments & Buffet Lunch

A Review of Sulfide Smelting Process Gas Handling Systems

Cartwright Consulting Co.

Zero Liquid Discharge Effluent Guidelines Compliance Strategies for Coal-Fired Power Plants FGD Wastewater

Transcription:

Page 1 of 6 I. Background SUMMARY OF VARIABLE NON-FUEL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ( O&M ) COSTS By Decision No. C15-0292, the Colorado Public Utilities Commission ( Commission ) approved a Settlement Agreement regarding Public Service Company of Colorado s ( Public Service or the Company ) last electric rate case in Proceeding No. 14AL- 0660E ( Electric Rate Case ). A component of the Settlement Agreement was the institution of a Clean Air-Clean Jobs Act Rider ( CACJA Rider ), which is implemented pursuant to C.R.S. 40-3.2-207(3)-(4) and allows for recovery of the forecasted or actual costs associated with Eligible CACJA Projects. Eligible CACJA Projects are defined as Cherokee 5, 6, and 7 (collectively a natural gas combined cycle ( CC ) plant, including interconnection equipment), the Pawnee selective catalytic reduction ( SCR ) and particulate scrubber, the Hayden 1 SCR, and the Hayden 2 SCR. The CACJA Rider allows for recovery of the capital and operations and maintenance ( O&M ) costs associated with Eligible CACJA Projects. Accordingly, a category of costs eligible for recovery under the CACJA Rider is variable non-fuel O&M expenses, including chemical and water expenses, and the variable O&M savings from the 2016 retirement of Cherokee 3. The information regarding variable non-fuel O&M expense below identifies the types of variable non-fuel O&M costs that make up the variable non-fuel O&M expenses for the CACJA projects and is consistent with provisions of the Settlement Agreement that the Company provide detailed cost information on an individual project basis and sufficient documentation to demonstrate that no costs in the CACJA Rider are also being recovered in base rates. 1 II. Description of Variable Non-Fuel Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs In general, variable non-fuel O&M at generating plants consists of the costs of consuming and handling base commodities. Base commodities are used for a variety of reasons at Company plants, but mainly for operations and to control emissions. As part of the Company s CACJA plan, emissions control technology has been added to the Hayden and Pawnee stations, and has also been installed at the new Cherokee CC plant. As a result, placing these projects in service will incrementally increase the amount of emissions control chemicals and water used at these three plants (i.e., increase variable O&M costs). The base commodities used for emissions control include three principal chemicals: ammonia, lime, and sulfuric acid; water is also used for emissions control. The specific use of each is described below: 1 Settlement Agreement, at 14, Proceeding No. 14AL-0660E (filed Jan. 23, 2015).

Page 2 of 6 Ammonia. Ammonia is used in SCR systems, such as those being added to the new Cherokee combustion turbines ( CTs ), as well as the Hayden and Pawnee units. A SCR system reduces the nitrogen oxides ( NOx ) in boiler flue gas. The ammonia is received and handled in a liquid form, but vaporized and applied just ahead of a large catalyst inside the boiler flue gas ductwork. This is where NOx reacts with the ammonia to form nitrogen and water. Ammonia is also used for boiler water treatment. In this application, it is used directly to raise the ph of the boiler water to specific limits to reduce corrosion of the boiler steel. Lime. Lime is used to remove sulfur dioxide ( SO 2 ) from the flue gas. Lime and water, as well as fly ash and water, are combined and mixed to make the lime/ash water slurry used in the Spray Dry Absorber ( SDA ) that is part of the SO 2 removal process of a scrubber. Sulfuric Acid. Sulfuric acid is used to control scale formation in cooling tower waters, reducing solid particle emissions from the towers. The material is received and handled in liquid form. It is then metered into the cooling tower waters, where it controls scale by maintaining the ph balance of the waters within certain limits. Minor amounts are also used in demineralizers. Water. Water is mixed with the lime and ash fly used to remove sulfur dioxide from flue gas, as described above. In addition, water is used for the heat rejection system and to turn into steam to generate additional electricity. The discussion below describes the incremental variable non-fuel O&M expenses, for each CACJA project, for each of the base commodities listed above. A. Pawnee Scrubber/SCR Chemical Descriptions & Uses The chemicals used in the operation of the Pawnee SCR and scrubber are lime, ammonia, and iron carbonate used as a combustion additive. The iron carbonate combustion additive is a powder material that is added to the coal as it is being fed to the feeder. Due to findings at other plants with SCRs that burn Powder River Basin coal, Babcock & Wilcox ( B&W ) determined that phosphate poisoning can significantly reduce the life of catalysts. The addition of the combustion additive removes phosphate prior to entering the SCR; therefore, B&W required the addition of this system as part of the performance guarantee. Additional variable non-fuel O&M costs at Pawnee include contract labor for lime slurry disposal. With regard to lime slurry disposal, the lime slurry mixes with flue gas and results in the formation of a by-product that requires disposal. The Company has a contract with a term that runs through January 31, 2019, for lime slurry disposal at Pawnee. B. Hayden SCR Chemical Descriptions & Uses The chemical used in the operation of the Hayden 1 SCR and the Hayden 2 SCR is ammonia. The Hayden 1 SCR and Hayden 2 SCR require anhydrous ammonia in the SCR units as part of the SCR process to significantly reduce NOx in the exhaust gas

Page 3 of 6 stream. The Company does not utilize any other chemicals in association with the Hayden 1 SCR and Hayden 2 SCR. C. Cherokee 2X1 CC Chemical Descriptions & Uses The chemicals used in the operation of the Cherokee 2X1 CC are sulfuric acid, ammonia, lime, water, and other chemicals. Sulfuric acid is used at Unit 7 to control circulating (cooling) water ph to prevent condenser tube scaling (deposits) and resultant heat transfer losses. With regard to ammonia, two types of ammonia are used in the operations of the Cherokee 2x1 CC: (1) Ammonia 19% (used at Units 5 and 6 in SCRs to remove NOx from the CT exhaust gas stream); and (2) Ammonia 29% (used at Units 5, 6, and 7 to control ph in feed water and LP HRSG (low pressure heat recovery steam generator) section. Lime is used to increase waste water ph in conjunction with ferric chloride to form floc in waste water treatment. In addition, water is used when the waste heat of the combustion turbines from Units 5 and 6 are used to heat the water and turn it into steam to generate additional electricity from the steam turbine located at Unit 7. Finally, several chemicals make up the other chemicals used at the Cherokee 2X1 CC. These chemicals are as follows: Sodium Hypochlorite (Bleach). Sodium hypochlorite is used at Unit 7 to control microbiological growth in the circulating (cooling) water to prevent micro-bio buildup in condenser tubes and resultant heat transfer losses and under deposit corrosion. FCT 4008. FCT 4008 is a dispersant used at Unit 7 that allows circulating water ph to be controlled at a higher operating limits requiring less sulfuric acid. This dispersant is primarily utilized to help lower sulfate in discharged water to the Platte River for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES ) discharge limits under the Clean Water Act. Defoam-18. Defoam-18 is used at Unit 7 to break foam in any cooling tower basin, which occurs as circulating water cycles of concentration increase. Sodium Hydroxide. Sodium hydroxide is used at Units 5, 6, and 7 to control ph in a reverse osmosis ( RO ) system to convert carbon dioxide to bicarbonate for second pass RO membrane rejection. Carbon Dioxide. Carbon dioxide is utilized for two different purposes at the Cherokee 2X1 CC. Carbon dioxide is used at Units 5, 6 and 7 for the purging of generators. Generators are filled with hydrogen during normal operation. Carbon dioxide is also used in common waste waters to lower and control the ph of treated waste water to meet the applicable NPDES discharge limits to the Platte River. Ferric Chloride. Ferric chloride is used in common waste waters, which are then used in conjunction with lime to form floc as part of waste water treatment. As discussed, waste water treatment occurs prior to discharge to the Platte River, consistent with NPDES discharge limits.

Page 4 of 6 Hydrogen. Hydrogen is used at the generators at Units 5, 6, and 7 to remove heat from the generator. RO-503. RO-503 is a dispersant used at Units 5, 6, and 7 to prevent the fouling of RO membranes. There are also fees and equipment related to variable O&M costs at the Cherokee 2X1 CC. These fees and equipment include the following: Mixed bed rental. At Units 5, 6, and 7, there is a monthly rental fee for RO water polishing vessels. Mixed bed swaps. At Units 5, 6, and 7, there is a fee for the swapping and regeneration of mixed bed water polishing vessel resins. Filter Cartridges. At Units 5, 6, and 7, these cartridges are located immediately prior to RO system. Filters keep small particulate matter from getting to RO membranes and plugging micro-pores. Hach Reagents. At Units 5, 6, and 7, Hach reagents are used in in-line analytical monitoring instruments and to perform wet bench analytical tests of various process waters. III. Methodology or Assumptions of Forecasted Costs This section explains the methodology and assumptions used in forecasting the variable non-fuel O&M costs for each of the Eligible CACJA Projects. Consistent with the presentation of O&M costs for the Eligible CACJA Projects in the Company s recently filed Phase 1 Electric Rate Case, Proceeding No. 17AL-0649E ( Current Rate Case ), Public Service is utilizing 2016 actual variable non-fuel O&M costs as the forecast for its 2018 variable non-fuel O&M costs for the Eligible CACJA Projects for the the 2018 CACJA Rider. 2016 represents the first full year of service for all of the Eligible CACJA Projects. The historical 2016 variable non-fuel O&M costs for the Eligible CACJA Projects represent a reasonable baseline with respect to establishing 2018 forecasted costs. Variable non-fuel O&M costs are mainly affected by three items: (1) the cost of base commodities; (2) the amount of commodities utilized per MWh of production; and (3) plant dispatch. Public Service estimates that base commodities costs for 2018 will be reasonably close to those for 2016. Further, the dispatch patterns of the Eligible CACJA Projects in 2016 appear to represent a normalized year for plant dispatch from those units. Consequently, 2016 actual costs represent a reasonable data set for development of the 2018 forecast.

Page 5 of 6 IV. Overall 2018 Financial Information The 2018 variable non-fuel O&M expenses discussed above are itemized in the following table. This table shows the forecasted cost for each Eligible CACJA Project and reflects the variable O&M savings from Cherokee Unit 3 s retirement. O&M Expense CACJA 2018 Pawnee Scrubber/SCR 5600078 714075: Chemicals Lime $ 974,015 5600082 714082: Chemicals - Ammonia $ 717,880 5600001 712110: Lime Slurry Disposal - Operations $ 163,032 5600076 Iron Carbonate $ 78,506 Total Pawnee $ 1,933,433 Cherokee 2x1 CC 5600076 714070: Chemicals - Other Chemicals $ 442,760 5600078 714075: Chemicals Lime $ 32,193 5600082 714082: Chemicals - Ammonia $ 92,185 5600083 714084: Chemicals - Sulfuric Acid $ 80,364 2 5600341 723037: Water Use Costs $ 439,160 Total Cherokee $ 1,086,662 Hayden 1 SCR 5600082 714082: Chemicals - Ammonia $ 404,927 Total Hayden 1 $ 404,927 Hayden 2 SCR 5600082 714082: Chemicals - Ammonia $ 109,210 Total Hayden 2 $ 109,210 Sub-Total O&M $ 3,534,232 Cherokee Unit 3 Commodity Costs To be Removed $(1,418,410) Total O&M $ 2,115,822 ** In January 2016, Xcel Energy converted their general ledger system from JDEdwards (JDE) to SAP. This table provides the account numbers where these costs were recorded using either system. 2 The one time Accrual Reversal made in 2016 was excluded from the estimate. The same adjustment will be made in the 2017 Electric Rate Case Proceeding No. 17AL-0649E at the appropriate time in the proceeding so that the 2018 CACJA Rider O&M costs are the same as what was presented in that proceeding for purposes of the proposed CACJA Rider roll-in to base rates.

Page 6 of 6 V. Risk Factors Several risk factors and uncertainties may result in variations between the 2018 actual costs and the forecasted 2018 costs provided in this filing. These general risk factors and uncertainties are both general and specific to certain Eligible CACJA Projects. As a general matter, commodity prices can change monthly, which can affect pricing for chemicals even where contracts are in place. An additional general matter relates to operations impacts, which include: the addition of new resources to the electric system (e.g., wind resources); the dispatch of generation in a different manner than anticipated; changes to removal rates (e.g., balancing air permits by injecting more lime or ash to lower SO 2 emissions or ammonia for SCRs to lower NO X emissions); weather; and unplanned outages (Unplanned outages are built into the generation forecast, but the actual unplanned outages may be higher or lower than estimated.) If any of the plants experience any significant maintenance issues and are offline for an extended period of time, commodities expenses could increase above forecasted levels. Finally, an additional risk factor is that the water supplies for the Fort St. Vrain plant and Cherokee plant are connected; therefore, any change in the Fort St. Vrain water costs from those forecasted may affect the actual water costs for the Cherokee plant. In a similar vein, it has been difficult to forecast treated water use at the Cherokee plant given the significant changes occurring at the plant. Therefore, treated water use may be higher depending upon construction activities and changes to the plant.