Selecting the Right Genetics (Matching Cows to your Environment) David W. Schafer Arizona Beef Day July 29, 2009

Similar documents
Beef Sire Selection for Cattle Genetic Improvement Program (Updated February 19, 2014)

Using EPDs in a Commercial Herd

Todd Thri(, University of Florida

Crossbreeding Systems for Arizona Rangelands

CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS FOR ARIZONA RANGELANDS

Crossbreeding-One of the Tools to Increase Profitability

Crossbreeding-One of the Tools to Increase Profitability

Understanding and Utilizing EPDs to Select Bulls

Creating Premium Beef Maximizing Dairy Profit

Choices in Breeding Programs to Fit Your Environment

Maternal Versus Terminal Crossbreeding Systems: A Six-Year Study at University of Nevada Gund Research and Demonstration Ranch

The Use of Composite Bulls Long Term Benefits and Challenges

Matching Cow Type to the Nutritional Environment

Crossbreeding systems to target feeder steer markets

B eef Cattle Management Update

Breed Comparisons of Weight, Weight Adjusted for Condition Score, Height, and Condition Score of Beef Cows

REPLACEMENT HEIFER DEVELOPMENT & NUTRITION

Selecting the Right Replacement. Robert S. Wells, Ph.D., PAS Livestock Consultant

Heifer Management. by Brian Freking Beef Progress Report-1

SELECTION FOR IMPROVED FEED EFFICIENCY: A GENOMICS APPROACH. Matt Spangler, Ph.D. University of Nebraska-Lincoln

GENETIC IMPROVEMENT FOR FORAGE USE GENETIC IMPROVEMENT PRINCIPLES FOR THE COWHERD 1/2/2014. Qualifications. Matt Spangler University of Nebraska

Management Decisions. Management Decisions. Tradition. Legacy. ReproGene /3/2018. Jared Decker, University of Missouri 1

Beef - Horse - Poultry - Sheep - Swine. August 2016

Pregnancy Rates. Jack C. Whittier Colorado State University. !I am not an economist and I do not. ! Biology and interactions

Selecting and Sourcing Replacement Heifers

Beef cattle genetic evaluation in Australia ~ BREEDPLAN. Robert Banks AGBU

COW CALF BREEDING AND GENETICS. Dhuyvetter

Overview. 50,000 Markers on a Chip. Definitions. Problem: Whole Genome Selection Project Involving 2,000 Industry A.I. Sires

Getting Large Numbers of Dairy Heifers Bred AI

Understanding Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs) Scott P. Greiner, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech

Genetic Selection to Improve the Quality and

Crossbreeding in Beef Cattle

Effective Use Of EPDs. Presented to: Minnesota Beef Producers Presented by: Kris A. Ringwall, Ph. D. NDSU Extension Beef Specialist

Got Milk? An Economic Look at Cow Size and Milk. July 13 th, 2015

SOURCES OF GENETIC VARIATION IN BEEF CATTLE 1. Larry V. Cundiff. U.S. Department of Agriculture

2015 Producer Survey Results

EFFICIENCY OF THE COW HERD: BULL SELECTION AND GENETICS

Robert S. Wells, Ph.D., PAS Livestock Consultant

Goal Oriented Use of Genetic Prediction

November Carcass EPD Comparisons Across Breeds. Calendar. Dan Drake, Livestock Farm Advisor

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MARBLING AND OTHER EPDs WITH IMPLICATIONS WHEN MAKING BEEF COW HERD BREEDING AND MANAGEMENT DECISIONS. May 25, 2007.

National Beef Quality Audit

Growth and Feed Efficiency

Mike Davis, The Ohio State University 6/19/14

FACTORS INFLUENCING PROFITABILITY OF FEEDLOT STEERS

Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D. Cooperative Extension Specialist

Breed effects and genetic parameter estimates for calving difficulty and birth weight in a multibreed population 1

Genetic variance and covariance and breed differences for feed intake and average daily gain to improve feed efficiency in growing cattle

Indiana Beef Evaluation and Economics Feeding Program

Veterinary Science. Beef Unit Handouts

Using Live Animal Carcass Ultrasound Information in Beef Cattle Selection

Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D.

Crossbreeding for the Commercial Beef Producer Alison Van Eenennaam, University of California, Davis

Traits and Tools for Retention and Replacement of Females

Improving Genetics in the Suckler Herd by Noirin McHugh & Mark McGee

Agricultural Science I Introduction to Beef Production Introduction to the Beef Industry 50 minutes

Off the Hoof. Kentucky Beef Newsletter February 2007

Measuring Cow Efficiency in the Herd. Ryon S. Walker Livestock Consultant Noble Research Institute

Crossbreeding Systems in Beef Cattle 1

Unit E Segments of the Animal Industry. Lesson 1 Exploring the Cattle Industry

USING GENOMICS TO AFFECT COW HERD REPRODUCTION. Matt Spangler University of Nebraska-Lincoln

UNIT 6 UNDERSTANDING THE PROCESS FOR PRODUCING, BREEDING, AND MARKETING AGRICULTURE ANIMALS

Indiana Beef Evaluation and Economics Feeding Program

Overview. Initial Research. Overview. Initial Research. Initial Research. Adapting Angus Cattle to Subtropical Climates 10/28/2015

Ma# Spangler Sept. 8, 2016

What s new in beef cattle genetics

Welcome to Igenity Brangus and the Power of Confident Selection

Evaluation of production efficiencies among primiparous suckler cows of diverse genotype at pasture

SIMMENTAL/FLECKVIEH AS BEEF BREED

Making Beef Out of Dairy

Assuring the Consistency and Competitiveness of Beef by Use of Correct Biological Types of Cattle

GENETIC STRATEGIES TO MAXIMIZE PROFIT

The Data Which Breeders May Collect For BREEDPLAN Analysis Includes: Flight time (from bail head to light beam)

A Basic Guide to. BREEDPLAN EBVs BREEDPLAN

Beef Production and the Brahman-Influenced Cow in the Southeast

Spring, 2002 Volume V Issue V. Selling 1000 HEAD 400 BULLS

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Understanding EPDs and Accuracies

NAHMS 2017 Beef Cow-calf Study

Pregnancies for Profit. Beef x Dairy Sires

Indiana Beef Evaluation and Economics Feeding Program

EPD Info 1/5. Guide to the American Gelbvieh Association Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs)

New Zealand Hereford Selection Indexes

Impact of Selection for Improved Feed Efficiency. Phillip Lancaster UF/IFAS Range Cattle Research and Education Center

Crossbreeding Systems for Beef Cattle

The Power of Economic Selection Indices to Make Genetic Change in Pro;itability

HERD REPLACEMENTS: HEIFERS OR OPEN COWS?

Australian Simmental Selection Indexes

Economic and Environmental Repercussions of Changing Bull Genetics

LIFE SCIENCE. Evaluation of Performance Trends in the Tucumcari Bull Test 1961 to 2000 BRINGING TO YOUR HOME ECONOMICS COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND

Comparison of Feedlot Performance and Carcass Traits Among Various Three-Breed Cross Calves

Why Do They Discount My Heifers So Much? T.A. Thrift and J. Savell University of Florida

BREED AND HETEROSIS EFFECTS OF AMERICAN ZEBU CATTLE 1,2

Estimation of Additive and Heterotic Direct and Maternal Genetic Effects for Carcass Traits in Beef Steers.

REPRODUCTION PERFORMANCE FOR COWS SIRED BY HIGH AND LOW MILK EPD ANGUS AND POLLED HEREFORD BULLS - A PRELIMINARY REPORT

EVALUATION OF UDDER AND TEAT CHARACTERISTICS, CALF. GROWTH, AND REPRODUCTION IN YOUNG Bos indicus Bos taurus COWS. A Thesis CODY JACK GLADNEY

How to select, grow, and manage replacement heifers W.A. Zollinger and J.B. Carr

Development and implementation of genomic methods in beef cattle genetic improvement in Australia. Rob Banks (AGBU) Alex McDonald (ABRI)

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XXI December 1, 2 and , Casper, WY. Integrating Information into Selection. Loren Berger.

Transcription:

Selecting the Right Genetics (Matching Cows to your Environment) David W. Schafer Arizona Beef Day July 29, 2009

Questions to ask yourself to aid in selecting the right genetics What resources do I have available? Labor Forage availability Topography Climate

Questions to ask yourself to aid in selecting the right genetics What is your marketing goal or target? Sell calves at weaning Sell calves as yearlings Retain ownership through feedlot

Questions to ask yourself to aid in selecting the right genetics What type of mating system will I use? Multi-purpose Designed to produce replacements & market animals Straightbreeding, rotational crossbreeding, composite crossbreeding & various modifications thereof Terminal All calves go to market, no heifers retained Designed to increase weight, growth rate & lean muscle Combination of Multi-purpose & Terminal

Questions to ask yourself to aid in selecting the right genetics What is the optimal mature size and milk production I can handle? Largely determined by forage availability

Optimal Mature Size & Milk Production Potentials for Various Levels of Forage Availability Forage Availability & Milk Production Potential High Forage Availability Large (> 1400 lbs) Mature Size Potential Medium (1100 1400 lbs) Small (< 1100 lbs) High MW TW TW Medium MW, MY TW TW Low MY TY Avoid Medium Forage Availability High Avoid Risky TW Medium Avoid MW, MY TW Low Risky MY, TY TY Low Forage Availability High Avoid Avoid Risky Medium Avoid Risky Risky Low Avoid Risky MW, MY MW = Good for multipurpose herds when calves are sold at weaning. MY = Good for multipurpose herds when calves are retained & sold as yearlings or at slaughter. TW = Good for herds with terminal crossing when calves are sold at weaning. TY = Good for herds with terminal crossing when calves are retained & sold as yearlings or slaughter.

Thanks to Don Kress, Mike MacNeil, and the Western Coordinating Committee for Beef Cattle Breeding (WCC-1) for the graph.

Questions to ask yourself to aid in selecting the right genetics Based on the answers to the previous questions what breed or breeds am I going to use?

Relative Performance of 25 Common Beef Breeds Growth Rate & Lean to Fat Age at Breed Mature Size Ratio Puberty Milk Production Jersey X X X XXXXX Longhorn X XXX XXX XX Hereford-Angus XXX XX XXX XX Red Poll XX XX XX XXX Devon XX XX XXX XX Shorthorn XXX XX XXX XXX Galloway XX XXX XXX XX South Devon XXX XXX XX XXX Tarentaise XXX XXX XX XXX Pinzgauer XXX XXX XX XXX Brangus XXX XX XXXX XXX Brahman XXX XXX XXXXX XXX Nellore XXXX XXX XXXXX XXX Braunvieh XXXX XXXX XX XXXX Gelbvieh XXXX XXXX XX XXXX Hostein XXXX XXXX XX XXXXX Simmental XXXXX XXXX XXX XXXX Maine Anjou XXXXX XXXX XXX XXX Salers XXXXX XXXX XXX XXX Piedmontese XXX XXXXXX XX XX Limousin XXX XXXXX XXXX X Charolais XXXXX XXXXX XXXX X Chianina XXXXX XXXXX XXXX X Increasing number of X s indicates higher values. From Cundiff et al. (1993).

V Bar V Ranch Breeding Project Evaluate the performance of various purebreds &/or composites from conception to consumption using Herefords as our control population. Evaluate at least 150 animals of each breed type by bringing in 50 head over a 3 year period to reduce environmental effects.

Breeds being evaluated at the V Hereford Bar V

Breeds being evaluated at the V Bar V Bar T Bar Composite ¼ Angus, ¼ Hereford, ¼ Gelbvieh, ¼ Barzona/Senepol

Breeds being evaluated at the V Bar V CGC Composite ½ Red Angus, ¼ Charolais, ¼ Tarentaise USDA Research Center, Miles City, MT

Breeds being evaluated at the V Bar V Waguli ½ Wagyu, ½ Tuli

Breeds being evaluated at the V Tuli Bar V

Breed of Dam Solutions Breed BW WW BTB 0.2 15.7 CGC -0.7 13.0 Hereford 1.0-28.6 Mixed 0.6 15.1 Tuli -6.6-27.3 Waguli -7.1-47.2 Waguli-X -3.5 15.2

Breed of Sire Solutions Breed BW WW Example WW Angus 6.2 15.5 416 Red Angus 5.6 24 424 CGC 6.1-11.2 389 Hereford 8.7 17.7 418 Wagyu -4.7 24.3 424 Tuli 2.2-20.8 379 Waguli 0 0 400

Heterosis coefficient for BW & WW For every 1% increase in heterosis, we are getting an increase in BW of 0.024 lbs and an increase in WW of 0.193 lbs. Example #1: Hereford crossed on Hereford is zero heterosis. A Hereford crossed on a CGC is 100% heterosis. 100 x 0.024 = 2.4 lbs increased BW and 100 x 0.193 = 19.3 lbs increased WW Example #2: Hereford bull crossed on BTB cow equals 75% heterosis since the BTB composite is 25% Hereford. 75 x 0.024 = 1.8 lbs increased BW and 75 x 0.193 = 14.5 lbs increased WW

Age of Dam Age of Dam Adjustment Factors for BW & WW V-V BW BIF BW V-V WW BIF Male WW BIF Female WW 2 6.2 8 46.5 60 54 3 3.7 5 53.1 40 36 4 1.4 2 22 20 18 5-10 0 0 0 0 0 11+ 2.4 3 19 20 18

Summary Selecting the right genetics is about knowing what forage resources you have and knowing your marketing objective. Study breed characteristics before selecting. Good crossbreeding systems will add pounds and value to your cow herd.

Questions?