Appendix K DERM database preliminary assessment

Similar documents
Arrow Energy EIS GROUNDWATER IMPACT ASSESSMENT. April 2012

12.0. Exceedance thresholds and determining response actions

Community Information Session Surat Basin

Arrow Energy. Surat development update. December 2017

Arrow Energy. Surat operational update. July 2016

8.0. Springs monitoring and management the Joint Industry Plan

A Risk to Groundwater from Coal Seam Gas Extraction in the Surat Basin

Appendix L Preliminary trend analysis methodology report

Advice to decision maker on coal mining project

4.0. Surat QCLNG bore baseline program status

QGC STAGE 3 WATER MONITORING MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015 ANNUAL REPORT

Appendix I Stage 1 groundwater monitoring bore pumping tests

APPENDIX L: FYFE REPORT ON QCLNG PROJECT SOIL SUBSIDENCE MONITORING SURVEY

CTSCo s Surat Basin Carbon Capture and Storage Project

Appendix C: 2014 Monitoring Results and Interpretation

Coal Seam Gas Groundwater Field Day. AgForce Projects Moura Tuesday 18 March 2014

1.0. Stage 2 CSG water monitoring and management plan

Background. Much of the CA is directly underlain by the Walloon Coal Measures (WCM) which are the target of proposed coalbed methane (CBM) development

CSG GROUNDWATER FIELD DAY [WORKBOOK]

ARROW ENERGY UPDATE COMMUNITY INFORMATION SESSIONS SEPTEMBER 2018

Stage 3 CSG water monitoring and management plan 1.0

Fortescue Metals Group Ltd. Peer review and model appraisal. Hydrogeological Assessment for the. Cloudbreak Water Management Scheme

Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1

Dynamic groundwater-river interaction model for planning water allocation in a narrow valley aquifer system of the Upper Motueka catchment

Subsidence, Aquitard Integrity and Aquifer Interconnectivity Project Plan. 1. Introduction... 3

11.0. Re-injection and repressurisation options

MEMORANDUM. Kathy Yager USEPA OSRTI Dick Goehlert USEPA Region 1 Darryl Luce USEPA Region 1 Mindy Vanderford, GSI Environmental, Inc.

Pattle Delamore Partners Limited

Draft Fact Sheet Butte County Stable Isotope Recharge Study

Western Surat Gas Project Water Monitoring and Management Plan

Arrow Energy Arrow in the Surat

San Mateo Plain Groundwater Basin Assessment Stakeholder Workshop #7 9 NOVEMBER 2017

GLNG PROJECT - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Climate Change: Implications for Groundwater Recharge and Saltwater Intrusion on the Gulf Islands

Appendix U Draft exceedence response plans

Hydrogeological Investigation and Analyzing Groundwater Scenario in Haringhata Block, West Bengal

Review of Groundwater Information in the Lower Mekong Basin

ASHTON LONGWALL 103 MID PANEL REPORT

Blyth Creek Event Release Technical Impact Assessment Report

Release Notice. Document Conventions. Document Custodian

Optimizing Recharge in the Pauba Valley

Montana Ground-Water Assessment Statewide Monitoring Well Network

Investigation of sustainable development potential for Ulubey Aquifer System, Turkey

MEETING MINUTES Arrow Surat Community Reference Group

Anglesea Mine Hydrology and Hydrogeotechnical Study

Water Monitoring by the CSG Industry in South East Queensland. Shaun Davidge / David Gornall Water Planning and Resources Santos GLNG

Appendix J: IESC Advice and Response Checklist

San Mateo Plain Groundwater Basin Assessment Stakeholder Workshop #8 17 APRIL 2018

APPENDIX 5: SAMPLE MODEL RESULTS

Report. Hydraulic Fracturing Environmental Assessment. Australia Pacific LNG. 1 June Prepared for. GPO Box 148 Brisbane QLD 4001

Arrow Update. Arrow Research. Groundwater monitoring and modelling. Demonstrations at Theten. Arrow Update. Domestic gas expansion activities

Overview of Water Resources (Part 2): Groundwater in Sonoma Valley

WATER LEVEL CHANGES IN THE UNCONFINED AQUIFER OF THE SAN LUIS VALLEY,

Capital Area Ground Water Conservation Commission

Shepparton Irrigation Region Water Supply Protection Area Groundwater Management Plan

Katunga Water Supply Protection Area Management Plan (Groundwater)

Water impacts of onshore gas development NSW research update

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQS)

AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY EVALUATION REPORT

Purpose: Continued development of a conceptual model, incorporating the hydrogeologic information.

Mid-Loddon Groundwater Management Area Local Management Rules

Coal Seam Gas Water Management

SALINAS VALLEY GROUNDWATER BASIN SETTING INITIAL REVIEW FOR DEVELOPMENT OF GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY PLAN

Fitzpatrick Aquifer Delineation and Allocation. September 2017

Annual Monitoring Report for Calendar Year 2009

Groundwater December Re: Legacy Way Groundwater Levels December February 2017

Coal Seam Gas: Context, Issues and (some) Solutions

PROTECTING WATER RESOURCES

Why is So Much Hot Air Bubbling to the Surface: CSG Impacts vs No Impacts?

Groundwater Level Forecasting

Capital Area Ground Water Conservation Commission

Documentation of Groundwater Model

CHAPTER 7 GROUNDWATER FLOW MODELING

Montana Ground-Water Assessment Statewide Monitoring Well Network

Scoping Study for Upper Petaluma River Watershed Flood Control Project. Frequently Asked Questions

Impact of the September 4, 2010 Canterbury Earthquake on Nitrogen and Chloride. Concentrations in Groundwater

HYDROLOGIC FACTORS AFFECTING SINKHOLE DEVELOPMENT IN A WELL FIELD IN THE KARST DOUGHERTY PLAIN, SOUTHWEST OF ALBANY, GEORGIA

COAL SEAM GAS WATER AND SALT MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

ASSESSMENT OF WATER LEVEL DECLINE RATES WITHIN THE OGALLALA AQUIFER KANSAS

Report on Effects of Groundwater Withdrawal from the Doghouse Meadow, Yosemite National Park

Montana Ground-Water Assessment Statewide Monitoring Well Network

Task 4.2 Technical Memorandum on Pumping Impacts on Squaw Creek

Australia Pacific LNG submission to the Senate Rural Affairs and Transport Committee: Inquiry into the management of the Murray-Darling Basin impact

S OUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER

BASIN MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES LLANO SECO SUBINVENTORY UNIT

Amount of Water Available Annually: 21,000 acre-feet per year (af/yr) upon project completion

Developing Decision Support System (DSS) for Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM)

Landscapes & Industries

Groundwater Level and Movement

Aquifer Science Staff, January 2007

Subject: Peer review of Duntroon Quarry hydrogeologic modelling: Report #1

CHAPTER 9 TABLE OF CONTENTS

ASSESSMENT OF UTILIZABLE GROUNDWATER RESOURCES IN A COASTAL SHALLOW AQUIFER

Synopsis. Geoffrey R. Tick Dorina Murgulet Hydrogeology Group The University of Alabama UA Project Number Grant # 09-EI UAT-2

STRAWMAN OUTLINE March 21, 2008 ISWS/ISGS REPORT ON THE OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES OF MEETING WATER DEMAND IN NORTH-EAST ILLINOIS

Groundwater. Groundwater Movement. Groundwater Movement Recharge: the infiltration of water into any subsurface formation.

Heretaunga Aquifer Groundwater Model Executive Summary of Development Report. May 2018 HBRC Report No. RM18-16 Publication No.

Numerical Groundwater Model for the Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District

DYNFLOW accepts various types of boundary conditions on the groundwater flow system including:

Transcription:

Appendix K DERM database preliminary assessment

FILE NOTE SUBJECT: DERM GROUNDWATER MONITORING DATABASE ANALYSIS AUTHOR: NICOLE CARUSO DATE: MARCH 2012 PROJECT: GROUNDWATER Introduction QGC aims to undertake an analysis of the latest data extraction of the DERM groundwater bore monitoring database, to inform its own regional understanding of baseline groundwater potentiometric surface levels and to aid in identification of potential sources of impacts to these levels. Additionally, water level data sourced from the DERM database will provide calibration data for QGC s GEN3 dual phase numerical groundwater model development, which will then be utilised for undertaking future scenario predictions. Any vertical hydraulic gradient information that can be gleaned from the DERM data will also be assessed by QGC in terms of ongoing regional aquifer connectivity studies. Methodology DERM s groundwater database is not categorised by bore type and purpose. Therefore, to assess long-term monitoring data, the entire database must be queried for multiple water level records. During 2012, QGC intends to process and analyse the DERM groundwater database water level records. The data for bores within the Surat Basin and nearby surrounds will primarily be categorised by source aquifer. The data will then be further queried to establish bores with more than one groundwater level record, in order to produce hydrographs and analyse groundwater trends. For bores that are identified as having a significant temporal record or identified as dedicated monitoring bores, spatial locations and screen depths will be assessed within QGC s 3D geological model to confirm the contributing aquifer(s) for each bore. Hydrograph trends will be assessed in relation to local stratigraphy and rainfall trends. A detailed review of regional groundwater extraction entitlement data and compiled knowledge of basin-wide extractions will also be completed. This review will provide a source for comparison of potentiometric surface trends with nearby groundwater use before, during and after CSG development, as the data is continually updated and analysed. Progress to Date Preliminary analysis of the DERM groundwater database indicates that there are very sparse records of ongoing regular groundwater level monitoring across the Surat Basin. Where regular groundwater monitoring is undertaken, these sparse records are geographically spread widely across the basin. An exception to this is in the Condamine River Alluvium region, east of QCLNG tenements in a relatively small area northwest and south of Dalby. In this area there are 100 groundwater bores that have greater than 100 groundwater level records between 1965 and 2011. A sampling of these bores is depicted in Figure 1 to illustrate the geographical spread of these bores and their contributing aquifer(s). The locations of dedicated DERM groundwater monitoring bores or DERM database bores with significant (i.e. ten or more and relative to QGC tenements) length of water level records are also identified in Figure 1. QGC 275 George Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 GPO Box 3107, Brisbane QLD 4001 Tel: (61) 7 3024 9000 Fax: (61) 7 3024 8999 www.qgc.com.au

Page 2 There are only three DERM monitoring bores equipped with data loggers recording daily water level measurements located within the Surat Basin. These bores are all located in the northern Surat Basin (refer to Figure 1): RN 42220061, screened shallow from 9.8 m to 30.8 m depth within the Mooga Sandstone and Orallo Formation with groundwater level records from 1993 through 2011, located 93 km west of QCLNG s Northern Development Area tenements. RN 42220058, screened shallow from 20 m to 53 m depth within the Gubberamunda Sandstone and Westbourne Formations with groundwater level records from 1900 through 2011, located 108 km west of QCLNG s Northern Development Area tenements. RN 13030613, screened from 69 m to 129 m depth within the Hutton Sandstone with groundwater level records from 1993 through 2011, located 120 km west/northwest of the QCLNG Northern Development Area tenements. The only bores within the DERM groundwater database with multiple groundwater level records that are located within QCLNG tenements are RN 13030808 (Lawton block) and RN 13030809 (Paradise Downs block). These two bores have sporadic records (10 and 11 in number respectively) since 2003; construction records indicate they are shallow and are screened between 9 m and 39 m depth in the Westbourne Formation and Springbok Sandstone. In the south-central Surat there are six bores with limited records (13 to 24 records between 1915 and 1969). These are deep bores, screened between 800 m and 1200 m depth in the Mooga Sandstone, Orallo Formation and Gubberamunda Sandstone. Finally, in the north-eastern Surat, there are eleven bores in the Alluvium/Hutton Sandstone and Evergreen Formation/Precipice Sandstone with between 25 and 40 records between 2006 and 2011. Examples of water level hydrographs compared to cumulative residual rainfall curves from nearby BOM rainfall recording stations (located within the same rainfall districts) are provided below in Figures 2 and 3. RN 42220058 shows a steady decline of 0.17 m/yr in the Gubberamunda Sandstone and Westbourne Formation. The other graph shows groundwater levels from bores screened in the Walloon Coal Measures between 11 m and 51 m depth, located near the Condamine River Alluvium region in the eastern Surat, 15 km north of the QCLNG Southern Development Area: RN 42230204, RN 42230205 and RN 42230208. Generally, groundwater levels in RN 42230205 and RN 42230208 increase with rainfall in 1970, flattening out in 1976. Hydrographs reflect rainfall peaks in 1984, 1989 and 1998/1999. RN 42230204 appears to possibly have some pumping influences early in its record through to 1990, following a period of recovery through 1993 at which point its hydrograph begins to mimic rainfall patterns. Discussion There appears to be only two DERM groundwater monitoring bores with medium to long term records within QCLNG tenements (RN 13030808 and RN 13030809) which may be suitable for QGC s ongoing groundwater monitoring program. The condition, ownership and purpose of these bores are unknown, and will be further investigated to assess their monitoring capacity and appropriateness. Additionally, there are many (100+) bores that are located north and east of QCLNG s Southern Development Area and are, according to the DERM database, screened at least in part within the Condamine River Alluvium. QGC s initial investigation indicates that many of these bores in the Condamine Alluvium area may be screened through the deeper Walloons or outcrop edges of the Westbourne Formation or Springbok Sandstone. Details of these bores are being investigated further by QGC as to their monitoring capacity and appropriateness. Although the complete DERM database is yet to be interrogated by QGC, the analysis undertaken to date indicates that longer term groundwater level trends may correlate with long term rainfall trends.

Page 3 Preliminary Conclusions The paucity of long term regional groundwater level monitoring data that is relevant to QGC s tenements is highlighted by the review of the DERM data. This emphasises the need for QGC to collect accurate groundwater level data on QGC tenements. Further detailed assessment of possible suitable DERM monitoring bores will be undertaken over the next year. This may require discussions with DERM concerning monitoring frequency and methods. QGC will also discuss with our Industry Collaborators the availability and suitability of other long term groundwater level data which may be useful for both regional trend analysis and to assist the calibration of the GEN 3 model.

Page 4 Figure 1 Location of selected DERM database bores

mahd Page 5 350 Gubberamunda/Westbourne (Northern Surat) 500.00 349.5 0.00 349 348.5 348 347.5 347 346.5 Steady decline in water level of 0.17 m/yr over 11 year period of record dispite fluctuations in rainfall -500.00-1000.00-1500.00-2000.00 Cumulative Residual Rain (mm/month) 346 27/01/1990 23/10/1992 20/07/1995 15/04/1998 9/01/2001 6/10/2003 2/07/2006 28/03/2009-2500.00 RN 42220058 Rain Station 043014 Figure 2 RN 42220058 comparison against residual rainfall

mahd Page 6 Walloons Coal Measure (Eastern Surat) 296 1984 1989 294 1998/1999 500 1970 292 290 288 286 Groundwater levels mimic rainfall indicating localised recharge with less influence from regional extraction Likely pumping influencing groundwater level trend early in record with recovery period 1990-1993 0-500 -1000 Cumulative Residual Rainfall (mm/month) 284-1500 282-2000 31/12/1958 22/06/1964 13/12/1969 5/06/1975 25/11/1980 18/05/1986 8/11/1991 30/04/1997 21/10/2002 12/04/2008 3/10/2013 RN 42230204 RN 42230205 RN 42230208 Rain Station 041215 Figure 3 RN 42230204, RN 42230205 and RN 42230208 comparison against residual rainfall