Chapter 16: Equilibrium

Similar documents
Chapter 24: Monopoly. Watanabe Econ Monopoly 1 / 61. Watanabe Econ Monopoly 2 / 61. Watanabe Econ Monopoly 3 / 61

Chapter 15: Monopoly. Notes. Watanabe Econ Monopoly 1 / 83. Notes. Watanabe Econ Monopoly 2 / 83. Notes

Chapter 23: Aggregate Supply

Chapter 25: Monopoly Behavior

Problem Set 3 Eco 112, Spring 2011 Chapters covered: Ch. 6 and Ch. 7 Due date: March 3, 2011

Introduction to Economic Institutions

Instructions: DUE: day of your unit exam Block Period 1/31 st or 2/1 st

Government Policy, Efficiency, and Welfare

Econ*1050 Introductory Microeconomics Instructor: Vitali Alexeev. Quiz 6 (Chapter 8)

ECON 101: Principles of Microeconomics Discussion Section Week 12 TA: Kanit Kuevibulvanich

Welfare economics part 2 (producer surplus) Application of welfare economics: The Costs of Taxation & International Trade

Econ 200 Fall Opportunity Cost and the Gains from Trade Supply and Demand Firms and Industries

Government Regulation

Outline. Introduction. ciency. Excise Tax. Subsidy 2/29

6) Consumer surplus is the red area in the following graph. It is 0.5*5*5=12.5. The answer is C.

Econ 200, Summer 2011, Dr. Alan and Prof. Crossley. Problem Set 2. (Reference: Mankiw and Taylor, Chapters 6, 7, 8, 13)

LECTURE NOTES ON MICROECONOMICS

Midterm 1 60 minutes Econ 1101: Principles of Microeconomics October 8, Exam Form A

Choose the single best answer for each question. Do all of your scratch-work in the side and bottom margins of pages.

Queen s University Department of Economics ECON 111*S

Downloaded for free from 1

Long Run Analysis. Definition 3

Econ 101, section 3, F06 Schroeter Exam #2, Red. Choose the single best answer for each question.

Adam Smith Theorem. Lecture 4(ii) Announcements. Lecture. 0. Link between efficiency and the market allocation.

Ecn Intermediate Microeconomic Theory University of California - Davis June 11, 2009 Instructor: John Parman. Final Exam

Midterm 1 60 minutes Econ 1101: Principles of Microeconomics October 7, Exam Form A

1. Welfare economics is the study of a. the well-being of less fortunate people. b. welfare programs in the United States.

The Analysis of Competitive Markets

Revisiting the Market Equilibrium. Consumers, Producers, and the Efficiency of Markets. Consumer Surplus. Welfare Economics

Econ : Principles of Microeconomics Midterm practice problems

Econ 2113 Test #2 Dr. Rupp Fall 2008

Policy Evaluation Tools. Willingness to Pay and Demand. Consumer Surplus (CS) Evaluating Gov t Policy - Econ of NA - RIT - Dr.

Supply and demand: Price-taking and competitive markets

ECON 101 KONG Midterm 2 CMP Review Session. Presented by Benji Huang

Econ 300: Intermediate Microeconomics, Spring 2014 Final Exam Study Guide 1

P S1 S2 D2 Q D1 P S1 S2 D2 Q D1

Intermediate Microeconomics 301 Problem Set # 2 Due Wednesday June 29, 2005

NAME: INTERMEDIATE MICROECONOMIC THEORY FALL 2006 ECONOMICS 300/012 Final Exam December 8, 2006

Midterm 2 - Solutions

1. (40 points, 5 points each) For the following questions, refer to the figure below.

1) Your answer to this question is what form of the exam you had. The answer is A if you have form A. The answer is B if you have form B etc.

Eastern Mediterranean University Faculty of Business and Economics Department of Economics Fall Semester

Ecn Intermediate Microeconomic Theory University of California - Davis March 19, 2009 Instructor: John Parman. Final Exam

Lecture 7. Consumers, producers, and the efficiency of markets

Basics of Economics. Alvin Lin. Principles of Microeconomics: August December 2016

Midterm 2 Sample Questions. Use the demand curve diagram below to answer the following THREE questions.

ECO 2301 Spring EXAM 2 Form 2 Wednesday, April 1 st Solutions

ECON 2100 (Summer 2015 Sections 07 & 08) Exam #2C

SOLUTIONS TO TEXT PROBLEMS 6

MICROECONOMICS Midterm Test (sample)

Econ 001: Midterm 1 Answer Key October 7th, 2010

Final Exam - Solutions

Microeconomics. Lecture Outline. Claudia Vogel. Winter Term 2009/2010. Part II Producers, Consumers, and Competitive Markets

Externalities. PowerPoint Slides prepared by: Andreea CHIRITESCU Eastern Illinois University

Final Exam - Solutions

1 Applying the Competitive Model. 2 Consumer welfare. These notes essentially correspond to chapter 9 of the text.

ECON 2100 (Summer 2012 Sections 07 and 08) Exam #2B Answer Key

Final Exam - Solutions

Econ 101, sections 2 and 6, S06 Schroeter Exam #2, Red. Choose the single best answer for each question.

Eastern Mediterranean University Faculty of Business and Economics Department of Economics Fall Semester

Introduction to Microeconomic Theory

Econ 1101 Summer 2013 Lecture 3. Section 005 6/19/2013

ECON 101 MIDTERM 1 REVIEW SESSION SOLUTIONS (WINTER 2015) BY BENJI HUANG

January Examinations 2014

ANSWER KEY Multiple Choice. 3 marks each. Indicate your answers on the bubble sheet provided.

ECON 251 Exam 1 Pink Spring 2012

ECON 251 Exam #1 Spring 2013

Economics 323 Microeconomic Theory Fall 2015

Competitive markets. Microéconomie, chapter 9. Solvay Business School Université Libre de Bruxelles

1. Demand: willingness to buy a good or service and the ability to pay for it; how much of an item an individual is willing to purchase at each price

Econ Test 2B Dr. Rupp Tuesday, March 3, 2009 Pledge: I have neither given or received aid on this exam Signature

The Four Main Market Structures

Econ 2113: Principles of Microeconomics. Spring 2009 ECU

EconS Perfect Competition and Monopoly

Midterm 1 60 minutes Econ 1101: Principles of Microeconomics October 9, Exam Form A

Midterm I Lecture 1 (9:05-9:55) 50 minutes Econ 1101: Principles of Microeconomics Thomas Holmes October 15, Name: TA s Name: Section Number:

ECON 3710, Intermediate Microeconomics Exam #1 Spring, 2008

Eco402 - Microeconomics Glossary By

MICRO FINAL EXAM Study Guide

Choose the single best answer for each question. Do all of your scratch work in the margins or in the blank space at the bottom of page 5.

This is the midterm 1 solution guide for Fall 2012 Form A. 1) The answer to this question is A, corresponding to Form A.

ECON 251 DISTANCE LEARNING: MAY 2014 MIDTERM EXAM INSTRUCTIONS

4. Which of the following statements about marginal revenue for a perfectly competitive firm is incorrect? A) TR

EC101 DD/EE Midterm 2 November 5, 2015 Version

AP Econ Section 9 Micro

AP Microeconomics: Test 2 Study Guide

ECON 251. Exam 1 Pink. Fall 2013

Microeconomics. Basic Information

To do today. Efficiency MB and MC Consumer surplus Producer surplus Deadweight loss. Theories of fairness

Monopolistic Markets. Regulation

Boston College Problem Set 6, Fall 2012 EC Principles of Microeconomics Instructor: Inacio G L Bo

Market Concentration and Power

Problem Set 3 21 September 2007

Homework 2 Answer Key

Elasticity and Taxation

Microeconomics. Use the graph below to answer question number 3

Microeconomics. Use the graph below to answer question number 3

Evaluating the Gains and Losses from Government Policies Consumer and Producer Surplus

Final Review Practice Problems

Econ 1101 Spring 2013 Week 3. Section 038 2/6/2013

Transcription:

Econ Microeconomic Analysis Chapter : Equilibrium Instructor: Hiroki Watanabe Spring Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Review Market Clearance Tax Who Pays the Tax? Tax Incidence First Theorem Summary Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Definition Definition. (Equilibrium) A market is in equilibrium when total quantity demanded by buyers equals total quantity supplied by sellers. Watanabe Econ Equilibrium /

Definition Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Definition Agent Individual Aggregate Buyer A Seller Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Definition A brief review on where D(p) and S(p) come from. Watanabe Econ Equilibrium /

Ch Demand Quick Review Example. (Marshallian Demand with Cobb-Douglas Utility) Liz s solution to utility maximization problem max C, T ( C, T ) = C T subject to = p C C + T constitutes a Marshallian demand φ C (p C ) = p C, via tangency condition MWTP( C, T ) = p C. Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Ch Demand Quick Review Tea x T (cups) Indifference Curves Budget Line (p C =) Cheesecakes x C (slices) Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Budget Line (p C =) Ch Demand Quick Review Marginal Willingness to Pay, Price p ($/slice) C Demand Curve Cheesecakes x C (slices) Watanabe Econ Equilibrium /

Ch Supply Quick Review Example. (Supply with Decreasing Returns to Scale) Jack s solution to profit maximization problem max y π(y) = py y (with MC(y) = y) constitutes supply via marginal condition s(p) = p, MC(y) = p. Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Ch Supply Quick Review TC(y) TR(y) w/ p= TR(y) w/ p= Total Cost, Total Revenue ($) Cheesecake y (slices) Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Ch Supply Quick Review Individual Supply s(p) Marginal Cost, Price p ($/slice) Cheesecake y (slices) Watanabe Econ Equilibrium /

Patch Them Together Individual Supply s(p) Individual Demand φ c (p) MC(y), MWTP(x), Price p ($/slice) Cheesecake y or x C (slices) Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Patch Them Together Fact. (Price Equals...) If Liz and Jack is maximizing their objective function ( ( ) or π(y)), Agent Price is = to Because of Buyer MWTP( ) tangency condition Seller MC(y ) marginal condition Assuming p T = for Liz and p > p MES for Jack. Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Patch Them Together Marginal Willingness to Pay MWTP(x) Market Price p MWTP, Price (cups or $/slice) Cheesecake y (slices) Watanabe Econ Equilibrium /

Patch Them Together Marginal Cost MC(y) Market Price p Marginal Cost, Price ($) Cheesecake y (slices) Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Definition. (Equilibrium Price) Equilibrium price p satisfies Remark S(p ) = D(p ). p(> p ) leaves excess supply because S(p) > D(p). Price drops till the gap closes. p(< p ) leaves excess demand because S(p) < D(p). Price increases till the gap closes. Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Watanabe Econ Equilibrium /

Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Fact. (Three Conditions of Equilibrium) If the market is in equilibrium, three conditions are met: p b = MWTP( ). p s = MC(y ). p b = p s = p. Watanabe Econ Equilibrium /

Tax and Equilibrium A quantity tax is a tax of t paid on each unit traded. Definition. (Tax on Different Agents) Sales tax is levied on buyers. Excise tax is levied on sellers. Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Tax and Equilibrium Question. (Tax and Equilibrium) How are prices affected? How is the quantity traded affected? Who pays the tax? Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Tax and Equilibrium Answer. (Tax and Equilibrium) Splits in two. Gets smaller most of the times. It doesn t matter who pays the tax. What matters is tax incidence. Watanabe Econ Equilibrium /

Clearing Market with Tax A tax rate t makes the price paid by buyers including tax, p b (whatever goes out of Liz s pocket), higher by t from the price received by sellers after paying tax, p s (whatever Jack takes in his pocket). p b p s = t. Even with a tax the market must clear. Quantity demanded by buyers at price p b must equal quantity supplied by sellers at price p s : D(p b ) = S(p s ). Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Clearing Market with Tax Market clearing conditions: p b p s = t D(p b ) = S(p s ). Note that these two conditions apply no matter if the tax is levied on sellers or on buyers. A sales tax rate t has the same effect as an excise tax rate t. Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Excise Tax Proposition. (Excise Tax Raises Marginal Cost) Excise tax t inflates marginal cost MC(y) by t dollars. Watanabe Econ Equilibrium /

Excise Tax Jack has to update his PMP Example. as follows: max y π(y) = p b y (TC(y) + ty). Marginal condition updates as follows: p b = MC(y) + t(= p s + t). Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Excise Tax Marginal Cost, Price p ($/slice) Individual Supply s(p) Individual Supply s(p) with t= Cheesecake y (slices) Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Sales Tax Proposition. (Sales Tax Reduces Marginal Willingness to Pay) Sales tax t drops marginal willingness to pay MWTP( ) by t dollars. Watanabe Econ Equilibrium /

Sales Tax Liz has to update her UMP Example. as follows: max C, T ( ) = C T subject to m = (p C +t) C + T. Tangency condition updates as follows: MWPT( ) = (p C +t) p s = MWTP( ) t(= p b t) Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Sales Tax p= MWTP(x * ) p= MWTP(x * ) Marginal Willingness to Pay, Price p ($/slice) C Cheesecakes x C (slices) Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Post-Tax Equilibrium Conclude: Excise tax lifts supply curve by t. Sales tax drops demand curve by t. Getting back to the tax? Question., does it matter who pays Watanabe Econ Equilibrium /

Post-Tax Equilibrium Aggregate Supply with Tax Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Post-Tax Equilibrium Price consumers face is p b =. Price firms face is p s =. Jack receives $ per slice, out of which he pays $ as excise tax. Transaction volume is q =. Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Post-Tax Equilibrium Aggregate Demand with Tax Watanabe Econ Equilibrium /

Post-Tax Equilibrium Price consumers face is p b =. Liz pays $ a slice and then pays $ as sales tax. Price firms face is p s =. Transaction volume is q = as before. Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Post-Tax Equilibrium It doesn t matter who pays the tax. Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Post-Tax Equilibrium Aggregate Demand with Tax Aggregate Supply with Tax Watanabe Econ Equilibrium /

Post-Tax Equilibrium Excise or sales, Jack gets the same reduced profit and Liz achieves the same reduced utility level. What matters is: how reduced are they? Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Tax Incidence When the excise tax is imposed, it s just the sellers who take on the tax burden? Technically yes, but the buyers also have to face a higher price than before and share the tax burden as well. Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Tax Incidence Definition. (Tax Incidence) Tax Incidence measures how tax burden is divided between buyers and sellers, defined by tax burden on buyers tax burden on sellers = (p b p )q t (p p s )q t. Watanabe Econ Equilibrium /

Tax Incidence Aggregate Supply with Tax Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Tax Incidence & Elasticity In the previous example, the tax burden was equally split between buyers and sellers. Not always. Proposition. (Tax Incidence & Elasticity) Inelastic party takes on larger tax burden than elastic party. Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Tax Incidence & Elasticity Aggregate Supply with Tax +/ Watanabe Econ Equilibrium /

First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics Proposition. (First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics) Provided that preferences are well-behaved and there are perfectly competitive complete markets, then equilibrium allocation is efficient. Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics Fact. embodies the first fundamental theorem. What if MC(q ) MWTP(q )? Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics How do we measure the efficiency of the economy as a whole? Definition. (Total Surplus) Total surplus measures the overall performance of the economy. It is defined by TS := CS + PS(+Tax Revenue). Watanabe Econ Equilibrium /

First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics Note that the equilibrium achieves the maximum total surplus possible. Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Tax Creates Deadweight Loss Tax creates deadweight loss due to deviation from the equilibrium. unless demand or supply is perfectly inelastic. Watanabe Econ Equilibrium /

Tax Creates Deadweight Loss Aggregate Supply with Tax Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Tax Creates Deadweight Loss Subsidy is a negative tax. Tax creates deadweight loss. Does that mean subsidy will create a negative deadweight loss, i.e., makes the economy better than the equilibrium allocation? Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / Tax Creates Deadweight Loss Aggregate Supply with Subsidy Watanabe Econ Equilibrium /

Market equilibrium realizes maximum total surplus. Tax incidence and elasticity. Watanabe Econ Equilibrium / consumer surplus, CS, see consumer surplus deadweight loss, efficiency, elasticity, equilibrium,,, excise tax,,, first fundamental theorem of welfare economics, marginal condition,,, marginal cost,, marginal willingness to pay,, marshalian demand, Marshallian demand, MC(y), see marginal cost MWTP( ), see marginal willingness to pay p b, see price paid by buyers φ, see Marshallian demand price paid by buyers, price received by sellers, profit maximization problem,, PS, see producer surplus p s, see price recieved by sellers q, see transaction volume sales tax,,, subsidy, t, see tax rate tangency condition,,, tax incidence, tax rate, tax revenue, total surplus, transaction volume, TS, see total surplus utility maximization problem,,