Illinois Water Audit and Loss Control Training Workshop

Similar documents
Illinois Water Audit and Loss Control Training Workshop

Water Loss. Water Research Foundation How to use the Free Water Loss Audit Software v 5.0

Benchmarking Water Loss Performance: The Death of Unaccounted For Water

A MODEL FOR THE NATION: Georgia s Statewide Water Loss Management Program

TWDB Description, Summary & Example of Agency Reports

Will Jernigan, P.E., Chair Cavanaugh & Associates, P.A. Jason Bodwell Georgia Environmental Finance Authority. Dan Carter Eco-Tech Inc.

The Changing Landscape and Business Case for Water Loss Control

Analysis of Calendar Year 2016 Water Audit Data from Public Water Supply Systems in the Delaware River Basin DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

Understanding Water Loss. Addressing Authorized /Unbilled Consumption and Apparent Water Loss

Addressing Non-Revenue Water

WATER LOSS CONTROL PROGRAMS

Water Conservation: Strategies, Pricing, Revenues

Georgia Statewide Water Loss Program

CA-NV AWWA Water Loss Technical Assistance Program Wave 4 Water Audit Level 1 Validation Document

ONTARIO CENTRE FOR MUNICIPAL BEST PRACTICES 200 University Ave., Suite 801, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 3C6. BEST PRACTICE SUMMARY REPORT February, 2008

Water Audit and Water Loss Abatement Program

WATER USES PROJECTED WATER USES THROUGH Table 4 2: 2015 Water Customers

Designing An Action Plan to Control NRW. Presented at the Utilities EA Conference in Kampala

Unit 3. Performance Indicators of Water Losses in Distribution System

Georgia Water System Audits and Water Loss Control Manual

Non-Revenue Water Assessment

Evaluation of Water Demand Management and Water Loss Control in Sanford, FL

Implementing SB 555: Validated Water Loss Audits and Reporting

City of Markham 2018 Proposed Water/Wastewater Rates. General Committee November 6, 2017

Dale Barrie Training & Technical Assistance Specialist. Iowa Rural Water Association - Dale Barrie 1

City of Philadelphia Water Accountability Committee Fiscal Year 2012 Water Audit

City of Markham 2017 Proposed Water/Wastewater Rates

AWWA Free Water Audit Software Grading Matrix

4 PLANNING DATA AND WATER DEMAND FORECASTING

DRBC Water Conservation Program and Water Loss Accountability Rules

Using Big System concepts on Small Systems Clean and Safe Drinking Water Workshop

Exhibit 1 City of Lake Oswego WMCP Progress Report Progress Report for Benchmarks Listed in the 2007 WMCP (Appendix E: Matrix 1 and 2)

Water Challenges WORKING TOGETHER TOWARDS SOLUTIONS California-Nevada AWWA Annual Fall Conference Large Meter Testing: Analysis and Calibration

Water Accountability and Loss Control Improvements in North America: A Progress Report

City of Guelph. IWA / AWWA Water Audit and Water Balance & 2007 Reports. June 18 th, Prepared by: City of Guelph IWA Report

Chris Kowitz. Oregon s Water Management and Conservation Plan Program A Tool for Understanding Current and Future Water Needs

Water Conservation Plan Annual Report Retail Water Supplier

North American Water Loss Conference 2017

Water Management Initiative (WMI)

Water Loss Audit Manual for Texas Utilities

The Financial and Policy Implications of Water Loss

The functional population of the Tampa

INTRODUCTION DATA COLLECTED WATER BILLING AND PRODUCTION DATA

Managing Losses in Water Distribution Networks

Table of Contents Part Title Page

Leakage/Non Revenue Water [NRW] Reduction

The focus of this article is methodologies

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARLAND, TEXAS: SECTION 1

Designing Water Rate Structures that Support Your Utility s Objectives

Rates, Rates, and More Rates

OTCO 12/11/13 Water Audits Meter Testing & Leaks

Self-Sustaining Validation: The Nation s First Water Loss Audit Certification Program

CITY OF LAGRANGE, GEORGIA UTILITY DEPARTMENT WATER CONSERVATION AND DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLANS

Contents. Metropolitan Municipality Non- Revenue Water Assessment. Objectives BACKGROUND. Session 2.3 Page1. Background. Metro Status quo.

Santa Margarita Water Audit and Water Loss Control Program Audit Period: Fiscal Year Water Loss Control Program Development

Public Health and Safety

Who d like to increase their revenue by 50%?

City of Benicia Water and Sewer Rate Questions and Answers September 5, 2017

Using Performance Indicators for Non-Revenue Water Reduction: A Case Study in a Small Island State (Mauritius)

Niue Island. November Niue Island SLMP October 2007 Page 1 of 28

Agua Special Utility District (Agua SUD) Water Conservation Plan

Utah Water System Efficiency. Water Loss Control Program

Investigation of Water Losses in Water Supply System: Muscat as a Case Study

William Murray Jr., P.E. Public Works Director Katie Victoria, MPA Sr. Administrative Analyst

Ithriam Leukes Water Business Development Manager / Agent South Africa

SILVER LAKE WATER & SEWER DISTRICT

Challenges to Reduce Non-Revenue Water

Final Report. Water Use Accountability

Water Conservation Plan

EVALUATION OF INDOOR URBAN WATER USE AND WATER LOSS MANAGEMENT AS CONSERVATION OPTIONS IN FLORIDA

Experiences in DMA redesign at the Water Board of Lemesos, Cyprus

Techniques for Developing a Rate Structure. Water & Wastewater Utility Operation and Management for Tribes

Water Conservation Plan

Water, Wastewater and Stormwater 2017 Budget 2018 Plan

WATER USE EFFICIENCY PROGRAM

Benchmarking leakage from water reticulation systems in South Africa

PROOF. Five Answers, most decision makers can t get their hands on. A publication from Acumen. Copyright 2014 Acumen Information Systems

City of Markham. Water Revenue Audit Richmond Street West Toronto, ON M5H 2G4

Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Water Service Rates, Fees and Charges. How to Submit a Protest

IWA Water Loss 2010 São Paulo, Brasil

Redesigning Water Loss Standards in California Using the New IWA Methodology

Water Use Efficiency Program 2019 Update

APPENDIX D CUWCC Best Management Practices Annual Reporting

Commercial & Industrial Large Water Meters

Training Event Urban Water Conservation and Demand Management for Utilities and all other Stakeholders

How to Read Your Water Bill and related topics. Tom Heikkinen, General Manager

Pacific Water Demand Management Newsletter August 2010

INTRODUCTION TO WATER AUDITS AND LOSS CONTROL PROGRAMS WAYNE MORGAN, P.E., MBA PROJECT MANAGER THRASHER JUNE 2017 TRAINING

Impact of Large Meter Sizing on Unaccounted For Water. Presented by:

Experience of Using the IWA/AWWA Water Audit Methodology in Salt Lake City Public Utilities Public Utilities Department

EPA 816-D November 2009 REVIEW DRAFT CONTROL AND MITIGATION OF DRINKING WATER LOSSES IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS

2016 Webinar Sponsors

Principles of Water Conservation and

MANAGING WATER LOSS FOR SUSTAINABILITY OF RURAL WATER SUPPLY

Level 1 Water Audit Validation

Water Loss Management In Distribution Pipe Basic Knowledge

Proceedings of Malaysian Science and Technology Congress, 4 6 Sept. 2007, Holiday Vila Subang. Pages 71-78

SALEM CITY REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL CULINARY AND SECONDARY WATER MASTER PLAN 5/2/2018

OPTIMIZING PRASA S METERING SYSTEM AND CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE April 20, 2017

Overview of Local Facilities. Integrated Resource Planning Advisory Committee

Transcription:

Illinois Water Audit and Loss Control Training Workshop Fall 2014 IWA/AWWA Standard Water Balance Own Sources Water Imported Total System Input ( allow for known errors ) Water Exported Water Supplied Authorized Consumption Water Losses Billed Authorized Consumption Unbilled Authorized Consumption Apparent Losses Real Losses Revenue Water Non- Revenue Water Billed Water Exported Billed Metered Consumption Billed Unmetered Consumption Unbilled Metered Consumption Unbilled Unmetered Consumption Unauthorized Consumption Customer Metering & Data Inaccuracies Leakage on Mains Leakage on Service Lines (before the meter) Leakage & Overflows at Storage 1

Real Losses Also called Physical Losses water that enters the distribution system, but never reaches a user. Includes: Leakage on transmission and distribution mains Storage tank overflows Service Line leakage up to customer meter Reducing real losses creates an additional resource which reduces operating costs and can be used to defer capital expenditure Apparent Losses Also called Paper or Economic Losses water that reaches a user, but is not properly measured or paid for. Includes: Theft Customer metering inaccuracies Data handling errors Reducing Apparent losses increases revenue but creates no new water 2

Non-Revenue Water (NRW) Is the difference between the volume of water produced and the volume of water billed to customers It consists of three elements with different values in $/gallon: Real Losses Apparent Losses Unbilled authorized consumption (political losses) Use this term instead of unaccounted-for-water Lots of new terminology Own Sources Water Imported Total System Input ( allow for known errors ) Water Exported Water Supplied Authorized Consumption Water Losses Billed Authorized Consumption Unbilled Authorized Consumption Apparent Losses Real Losses Revenue Water Non- Revenue Water Billed Water Exported Billed Metered Consumption Billed Unmetered Consumption Unbilled Metered Consumption Unbilled Unmetered Consumption Unauthorized Consumption Customer Metering & Data Inaccuracies Leakage on Mains Leakage on Service Lines (before the meter) Leakage & Overflows at Storage 3

Categorize Data Leak on transmission main Toilet leak Straight pipe Line Flushing Leak adjustment Wrong multiplier Storage tank overflow Flat rate accounts Slow meters Game Time 4

Common Pitfalls I What did we learn the first time around What did you learn the first time around? Time periods (production vs. meter reading) Units (MG vs. 1,000 gal) Financial calculations (include salaries?) Default values (take a zero or the default percentage?) Double counting (water exported should not be in billed metered) Production meter calibration vs. accuracy testing (electronics vs. correct flow reading) 5

Big Clues to Potential Errors Check to see if you have a validity score Failure to complete the audit grading scale fully will result in no calculated score An ILI of < 1 (This is theoretically not possible) An ILI of > 12 Very High Validity Score (>85) coupled with Very Low ILI (<2) after first audit Observations from Large System Audits Reconcile period of water supplied with water authorized consumption Billing period may be offset Caution of negative ILI s (more water consumed than supplied) Leaks and Breaks do not go in unbilled unmetered they are real losses Average cost of real losses is usually less than cost of apparent losses (units $/1,000 gal for apparent losses, $/Million gallons for real losses) Order of magnitude of losses (real is more than apparent, typically) 6

Validity Scoring Must meet/exceed all criteria to be eligible for the score Don t over/underestimate score Must be defensible (explain why 8 was picked instead of 6) What did you learn? Validity calls Team meetings Monthly tracking Calculations workbook 7

Common Pitfalls II How to Avoid Falling in to the Trap Default Values Provided for you in software Calculated based upon a comprehensive review of systems during the development Automatically receive a validity score of 5 Provided for 2 inputs Unbilled unmetered authorized Unauthorized consumption Use them Focus on a policy change to meter as much as possible even if it is not billed. 8

Some Unbilled Unmetered Authorized Fire Uses Fire fighting Training Hydrant testing System use Flushing Testing Plant use Cleaning Construction Political Loss (if not metered) Government buildings Public amenities (fountains, parks, golf courses) Landscape maintenance Public areas (medians, tree plantings) Not leaks and breaks Unauthorized Consumption Illegal connections Open bypasses Misuse of hydrants Meter tampering Use of unmetered fire for service Failing to notify utility when service is established and not receiving a bill Focus on strong policies/practices and revenue recovery activities designed to mitigate this. 9

Master Meter Error Adjustment This is your production meters leaving the plant Meter adjustment from verification testing, not electronic calibration Should not be 0 If testing not performed, use 1% to 5% under-registration Customer Metering Inaccuracies Considerations that determine accuracy Physical accuracy to measure flow Right-sizing Correct type of meter for usage Consider this the first step in consumption data gathering All the other billing components and considerations are not a part of this input 10

CMI getting at the Number Physical flow measurement Meter testing data (Rep sample 10%) Large meter testing Residential testing programs Weighted average of the data applied to appropriate consumption volume Can use factory default if no testing program is in place (1% to 2%) CMI The basis for all data gathering and input calculations arise from meter testing programs Meter testing is not the same as calibration Calibration should occur following the test to improve accuracy. Utilize the sample of tested meters to extrapolate data across applicable category and size of meter Field validation and billing system review coupled with testing and calibration will improve data validity and reduce apparent losses. 11

Systematic Data Handling Errors Everything else that happens between the meter reading and the bill. Reading errors Data entry errors Estimated bills Stopped meters Adjustments to consumption Black hole of customer accounts: (lost, not billed, not transferred) Bad policies (Non-bill status, temporary builder accounts, etc.) SDHE Should not be 0 Validity Score Low Flow chart billing process Billing system staff and meter reading representative need to be involved How do you begin to quantify Reports (adjustment report, misread report, estimated bill report, stopped meters report, exception report, builder accounts report) Policy review 12

It s the Money Financial Indicators Won t change your ILI Will make this a useful tool for utilities Clearly caused some problems Already seized upon by the media What s all this lost water costing Illinois Citizens? Three Values Total Annual cost of operating water system Customer retail unit cost Variable production cost Total Cost of Operating Water System What costs are associated with water system only in a combined system If there is shared staff/equipment try to allocate a % to water This still includes the chemicals, energy, pumping costs Does include staff and depreciation Combined Water and Sewer System Budget 13

Customer Retail Unit Cost THIS IS CALCULATED PER 1,000 GALLONS What the CUSTOMER pays per unit of water billed to them (1,000 gallons or CCF) Different rates (either customer class or tiers) Weighted average easier if you have 2-3 rates Multi-rates simple calculation: Total annual revenue from water sold (not including tap/late fees) / total annual volume of water sold If you bill in $/CCF you can use those units, but be sure to select them in the audit (or convert to $/1,000 gal) Cost of apparent losses are calculated at this rate Multi Rate Calculation Ex. Utility has 6 Rates $2.83-$8.25 Total Revenue for water sold $kgal $92,275,204 Total Volume Sold kgal 19,453,210 $92,275,204/19,453,210 $4.74/Kgal 14

Variable Production Cost THIS IS CALCULATED PER 1,000,000 GALLONS The Cost of supplying the next gallon of water For purchase systems this is the wholesale cost to purchase water (in $/MG) If you treat drinking water this is: chemicals, power to treat and pump water (in $/MG) If you have both it is a weighted average based on how much of each you supply your system. Your water superintendents or financial staff should be able to provide these numbers Check your work cost is much higher for purchase systems Ex. If it is $.60/1,000 to produce VPC is $600.00 Ex. If it is $2.34/1,000 to purchase VPC is $2,340.00 Real losses are valued at VPC Variable Production Cost Groundwater systems are typically $150-$500 per MG Surface water systems are typically $500 - $1,500 per MG Purchase systems are typically $1,500 - $3,000 per MG If you are outside these ranges, check your units! 15

This is your workshop What did you find? What can we clarify? What were your biggest issues? Understanding Validity Are my numbers valid? 16

What do those scores mean? Each data input has a Data Grade that is used to calculate your overall audit Data Validity For each input, there are criteria defining each Grade If you meet or exceed all criteria in a score, go up If you don t meet at least one of the criteria, even if you exceed all others, go down What does my grade mean? Be realistic and truthful There will be specific actions that can be taken to improve data grade The grades are weighted in the calculation of overall validity score Priority areas of attention are based on their importance and effect on overall validity when modified 17

Examples Is my grade good or bad? There is no good or bad, only high or low Don t compare yourself with others, only yourself Identify areas to improve your grades that make sense (financially) 18

AWWA Water Audit Software - Grading Matrix Game Time 19

Do People Really Care? Press Want a story wasteful local utility Elected Officials Want CYA when press and environmentalists call Environmentalist Want 0 loss of a precious resource Believe it is possible. Utility Staff Want to know what to do with this Citizens Are surprisingly busy What s Your Biggest Fear 20

No One Understands Water Loss is complex Technical The word loss (no way this is positive) Up on the web See it like they do A way for accounting for our water Where did it go? How much did that cost? Can I stop it? Up on the Web???????? What is going up: Validity score, ILI, 3 areas for improvement listed at bottom of audit 21

We Don t Look so good System to system comparison Human nature It will happen Message should always be about your utility Turn the ship back to building a better utility You got a D Focus on next steps How you are moving forward Don t focus on what you are missing What are you gaining Unavoidable Loss? How citizens see us delivering water How we think about delivering water 22

Bridge the divide Not a technical discussion It is a scale discussion Volume: millions of gallons Delivery mechanism: miles of pipe Visibility: underground Environment: Changing elevations, roads built over it, soil changes, climate influences Frame it using your utility It s all New to Me This could work in your favor We tend to get too technical Do not drown the utility in a sea of acronyms and water words As we learn we are on a more level playing field As we gain knowledge we are having to share it with our colleagues We don t have the shorthand yet 23

Spin the Message In tough economic times you are looking at non-revenue water Water that is not returning money to the utility Looking at internal efficiencies and policies to get the most value from the water supplied This can be two-fold message Financial value Environmental value supply-side conservation Focus on what you are doing The audit informed the utility s efficiency efforts It did not end there Everyone can do something Evaluating policies and procedures Increasing internal departmental coordination Looking at processes All free Common Questions How does your system compare? Why is our validity score so low? What are you going to do about all this water? How much is this costing/rates Why do you need a reservoir you are losing millions of gallons of water? 24

Resources IEPA ISAWWA IRWA Talking Points Handout E-mail of the Common Questions we completed in class? Resources 25

26

Metering and Accountability Policy Statement Asset Management Policy Statement 27

Methods to Reduce Real Losses 28

Methods to Reduce Apparent Losses Replace inaccurate meters Reduce/ Eliminate theft and illegal consumption Up-to-date accounting of customers and water use. No data transfer errors. Ensure accuracy of analysis from archived data and data used for billing / water balance Benchmarking Go to website 29

Benchmarking participants 2012 Benchmarking 21-26 Water Systems in the last 3 yrs. The National dataset only actively validated dataset with a 3 yr. history 30

Benchmarking 21-26 Water Systems Benchmarking 21-26 Water Systems 31

Open Discussion What did we miss? What else do you want to discuss? Frequently asked questions What will be done with the audits? What does my audit mean? Am I doing well? Is there room for improvement? Is it worth it to get my score from 8 to 9? What do I do next? How can I reduce losses? What is the payback? 32

Contact us anytime! IEPA ISAWWA IRWA???? Illinois Water Audit and Loss Control Training Workshop Fall 2014 33