Ohio Statewide Freight Study/ Plan Ohio Planning Conference July, 2014
Statewide Freight Plan Purpose: To understand to the greatest detail possible, how Ohio s freight infrastructure is being utilized. The study identified and analyzed modal freight volumes, commodities and origins/destinations and trends. Develop a MAP-21 compliant Freight Plan. OTEC July 2014
Statewide Freight Plan Why do a Freight Plan? Transportation is the largest cost (63 percent) of doing business for supply chain operators. An efficient transportation system allows ease of movement of raw materials into production and finished goods out to the market place. An efficient system lowers transport costs and makes Ohio more attractive to business & industry ie. Jobs. Transportation is linked to the economy Planning Conference July 2014
Ohio Imports $ 4
Ohio Exports $ 5
National Freight Tonnage at a Glance
Planning Conference July 2014
Statewide Freight Plan Designed to be included into the States Long Range Transportation Plan Access Ohio 2040 Freight Stakeholders; Logistics Industry Interviews, roll out to MPO s, RTPO s Freight Analysis Freight Flows Economic Trends Physical Assets Policies and Strategies Best Practices and Case Studies Inclusion into Access Ohio 2040 Planning Conference July 2014
Trucking Ohio Truck Freight Analysis
Truck VMT 1975-2010 30,000,000 Ohio State Highway System 25,000,000 20,000,000 Vehicle Miles Traveled 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000-1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Truck Traffic 10
Top 10 Commodities Top 10 Ohio Truck Commodities by Weight and Value Base Year = 2007 Weight (Thousand Tons) Value ($ millions) Commodity Number Percent Commodity Number Percent Total 936,314.5 Total $1,677,810.1 Base metals 78,102.6 8.34% Motorized vehicles 215,941.7 12.87% Gravel 76,157.8 8.13% Machinery 168,953.3 10.07% Nonmetal min. prods. 60,689.8 6.48% Electronics 130,210.3 7.76% Other foodstuffs 60,449.4 6.46% Base metals 110,376.1 6.58% Waste/scrap 59,450.4 6.35% Plastics/rubber 98,217.0 5.85% Cereal grains 53,329.0 5.70% Mixed freight 92,440.0 5.51% Motorized vehicles 36,622.8 3.91% Textiles/leather 92,049.8 5.49% Natural sands 35,034.8 3.74% Pharmaceuticals 78,840.1 4.70% Plastics/rubber 34,122.4 3.64% Chemical prods. 76,983.5 4.59% Mixed freight 30,034.4 3.21% Other foodstuffs 74,049.7 4.41% 11
Flow Maps Commodity-Specific Flow Maps: Automotive Parts 12
Trucking Issues Driver Shortage, Hours of Service (HOS) Regulations Truck Parking Fuel Cost Congestion Truck Size and Weight Exacerbated by driver shortage and HOS Need to identify oversize routes and terminals Highway Funding 13
Highway Freight Corridors Planning Conference July 2014
Rail Freight Ohio Rail Freight Analysis 15
Rail System Analysis Rail Freight Traffic Density 16
Rail Intermodal 20 65 100 100 Containers per Year CSX Cleveland 100,000 NS Toledo (Airline) 65,000 130 50 NS Cleveland 100,000 CSX Marysville 15,000 NS Columbus 200,000 CSX Columbus 130,000 200 CSX Marion 50,000 40 35 110 CSX Cincinnati 40,000 NS Cincinnati (Gest St) 110,000 NS Cincinnati (Sharonville) 35,000 CSX North Baltimore 20,000 17
Rail Freight Issues Ohio has a very strong rail freight system Large amount of public and private investment over the last 10 years, especially in intermodal Capacity to do more within economic and service constraints Shipment size Customer accessibility to rail Speed and reliability Intermodal investments, transload capabilities 18
Rail Issues 19 Abandonments or underutilized lines Represents excess capacity, yet the rail corridors may once again be needed New or expanding markets Shale oil and gas Agriculture export Heavy cargo loads Marginal economics of some short line operators; lack of traffic to reinvest Deficient infrastructure (especially short lines) such as inability to handle 286k pound cars; bridge deficiencies
Ohio Ports 20
LAKE ERIE PORTS 21
Port Capabilities Iron Ore Storage Capacity Stone/Dry Bulk Storage Capacity 8 7 Million Tons 6 5 4 3 2 Million Tons 8 6 4 2 0.912 0.03 0.25 0.3185 4.2398 0.86 7.75 0.6 1 0 0 Grain 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 Toledo Huron Sandusky Lorain Cleveland Fairport Harbor Ashtabula Conneaut 22
Lake Ports New cargo evaluation Short sea shipping Port of Cleveland Container Service to Europe Increased ship building & repair capabilities Shale oil and gas Inbound materials to Ohio frac sand, pipe, equipment Outbound petroleum distribution networks Containerized vessel feeder service Mode shift analysis Freight moving by truck or rail that fits a water profile 23
Ohio River Ports Ohio River Terminals 24
Ohio River Terminals Ohio River Terminal Clusters 25
Ohio River Profile 26 Existing barges primarily carry bulk cargo: coal, iron ore, stone, chemicals Heavy-lift capabilities and lack of multi- jurisdictional permitting are a big plus for over dimensional & weight loads Potential for general cargo moves Over 95% of Ohio River terminals are privately-owned Most of those have single-use, e.g., a coal terminal operated by an electric generating plant Identified approximately 24 private terminals which could handle cargo for any customer Of these24 terminals, about 10 handle general cargo, such as bagged products, semi-finished steel, machinery, or heavy-lift cargo
Ohio River Lock and dam maintenance, the heart of the inland waterway system 47% functional obsolescent, growing to 80% by 2020 20 cent per gallon user fee covers half the cost of lock and dam maintenance (HMT), with other half from congressional appropriations WRRDA Bill increased HMT spending, increased maintenance Slower speeds; but heavy lift, less fuel usage and scheduled service of barge transport compared to competing modes Environmentally friendly Marine Highway designations (M-70/29, M90) 27
Air Freight 28
Air Freight Air cargo market faces stiff competition Among other air carriers, and Trucks, container ships, and rail cars Air cargo primarily moves by two methods Dedicated cargo aircraft In the belly of passenger planes What is impacting air cargo Fuel Prices Passenger and freight carriers Declining Availability of Belly Space on Domestic Carriers A small percentage of air cargo is carried on domestic passenger aircraft in the US. Proximity to air cargo is essential for business & industry Air service is the most expensive, but also the fastest for just in time delivery s to keep production schedules moving Planning Conference 2014 July 2014
Next Steps Ohio s MAP-21 compliant Statewide Freight Plan Section 1118 Performance measures, national goals Education and outreach with MPO s, RTPO s, Stakeholders and our modal Partners Advancing initiatives ie. Operations plan, ITS, PFN, STS, OS/OW corridors and others Planning Conf. 2014 July 2014
Ohio Planning Conference July 2014
Mark Locker, AICP Statewide Planning & Research Maritime Freight Mobility & Logistics (614) 466-2347 Mark.Locker@dot.state.oh.us