Reshaping Regional Economic Development: Clusters and Regional Strategy Professor Michael E. Porter Harvard Business School U.S. Cluster Mapping Launch Event University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN September 29 th, 2014 This presentation draws on ideas from Professor Porter s articles and books, in particular, The Competitive Advantage of Nations (The Free Press, 1990), Building the Microeconomic Foundations of Competitiveness, in The Global Competitiveness Report (World Economic Forum), Clusters and the New Competitive Agenda for Companies and Governments in On Competition (Harvard Business School Press, 2008), Creating Shared Value (Harvard Business Review, Jan 2011), the Social Progress Index Report (Social Progress Imperative) and ongoing related research. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means - electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise - without the permission of Michael E. Porter. For further materials, see the website of the Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness (www.isc.hbs.edu), FSG (www.fsg.org) and the Social Progress Imperative (www.socialprogressimperative.org).
The Challenge The US economy is slowly emerging from the deepest crisis we have experienced in a generation However, the trajectory of the U.S. economy was already disturbing well before 2008 and the long term trend is continuing The Midwest is no exception 2
Disturbing Trends Rolling 10-year Compound Annual Growth Rate in Total Number of U.S. Private Nonfarm Employees, 1975-2013 3% 1975-2001 AVERAGE: 2.12% 2% 1% 0% -1% 1975 1981 1987 1993 1999 2005 20112013 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Employment Statistics survey; author s calculations. 3
Employment (in millions of jobs) 140 Disturbing Trends Private, Nonfarm Employment by Type of Industry 120 100 80 INDUSTRIES SERVING LOCAL MARKETS (CAGR= 0.89%) 60 40 20 INDUSTRIES EXPOSED TO INTERNATIONAL COMPETITION (CAGR= 0.02%) 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Source: Prof. Michael E. Porter, Harvard Business School; U.S. Cluster Mapping 2014 Benchmark Definitions (Delgado-Porter-Stern 2013), Richard Bryden, Project Director.
Compound annual growth rate Real Hourly Wage Growth by Educational Attainment 1979-2000 Versus 2000-2012 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% -0.5% -1.0% -1.5% Less than high school High school Some college College degree Advanced degree 1979-2000 2000-2012 Source: Economic Policy Institute, A Decade of Flat Wages, August 2013. Based on Current Population Survey. U.S. COMPETITIVENESS PROJECT 5
Real GDP per Capita, 2012 $55,000 Prosperity Performance of U.S. States 2001-2012 Delaware High but declining (+0.1%, $60,000) prosperity versus U.S. Connecticut Wyoming Alaska Alaska (+0.7%, (+0.7%, $61,000) $61,000) Massachusetts High and rising prosperity versus U.S. New York $50,000 $45,000 New Jersey Colorado Illinois California Virginia Minnesota New Hampshire Washington Texas Hawaii Louisiana Maryland North Dakota (+4.6%, $55,250) Nebraska Oregon (+3.1%, $48,069) South Dakota $40,000 U.S. Average GDP Per Capita, 2012: $42,784 Georgia Nevada Missouri North Carolina Ohio Wisconsin Pennsylvania Utah Indiana Rhode Island Kansas Vermont Iowa $35,000 $30,000 Michigan South Carolina Arizona Tennessee Maine Kentucky Florida New Mexico Idaho Source: BEA. Notes: GDP in real 2005 dollars. Growth rate is calculated as compound annual growth rate. 6 Oklahoma Alabama Arkansas West Virginia Mississippi Montana Low and declining prosperity Average U.S. GDP Low but rising prosperity versus U.S. Per Capita Real versus U.S. Growth Rate:.64% $25,000-1.0% -0.5% 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% Real Growth in Gross Domestic Product per Capita, 2001 to 2012
Regional Economic Development: Prevailing Approaches Open for Business Big Game Hunting The Next Big Thing Build it and They Will Come Improve the general business environment Compete aggressively for plants and new investments Enter new high tech/ high growth industries Invest in large infrastructure/ industrial zone projects Attempt to match the policies of peers Long lists of areas for improvement, with limited progress Table stakes Zero Sum Winner s curse High cost, low return unless address underlying weakness Neglecting the existing base 7 Many competing for the same industries e.g. biotech, creative class Very few regions have the assets to succeed in them Rarely offer a strong advantage versus other regions Generic infrastructure will not offset lack of skills, other weaknesses, and absence of related businesses
Towards a New Economic Development Model Traditional approaches to economic development are not working We must reshape the approach to economic development in the U.S. based on a deeper understanding of the drivers of competitiveness in the modern global economy The New Direction Focus on competitiveness, not job creation per se Cluster-based, reflecting core drivers of jobs and wages Build on existing and potential strengths, versus rely on reducing weakness Develop an overall strategy rather than a list of actions Prioritized and sequenced, not treating all weaknesses equally Data driven, not political or based on wishful thinking 8
What is Competitiveness? A nation or region is competitive to the extent that firms operating there are able to compete successfully in the regional and global economy while maintaining or improving wages and living standards for the average citizen Competitiveness depends on the long-run productivity and efficiency of a location as a place to do business - The productivity of existing firms and workers - The ability to achieve high participation of citizens in the workforce Competitiveness is not: - Low wages - A weak currency - Jobs per se 9
Defining the Geographic Unit for Competitiveness Nation States Regions Regions are essential economic units for competitiveness 20140929 US Cluster Mapping Launch Event v4 10
What Determines Competitiveness? Endowments Endowments, including natural resources, geographical location, population, and land area, create a foundation for prosperity, but true prosperity arises from productivity in the use of endowments 11
What Determines Competitiveness? Macroeconomic Competitiveness Sound Monetary and Fiscal Policies Human Development and Effective Political Institutions Endowments Macroeconomic competitiveness sets the economy-wide context for productivity to emerge, but is not sufficient to ensure productivity Endowments, including natural resources, geographical location, population, and land area, create a foundation for prosperity, but true prosperity arises from productivity in the use of endowments 12
What Determines Competitiveness? Microeconomic Competitiveness Quality of the Business Environment State of Cluster Development Sophistication of Company Operations and Strategy Macroeconomic Competitiveness Sound Monetary and Fiscal Policies Human Development and Effective Political Institutions Endowments Productivity ultimately depends on improving the microeconomic capability of the economy and the sophistication of local competition revealed at the level of firms, clusters, and regions Macroeconomic competitiveness sets the economy-wide context for productivity to emerge, but is not sufficient to ensure productivity Endowments, including natural resources, geographical location, population, and land area, create a foundation for prosperity, but true prosperity arises from productivity in the use of endowments 13
Improving the Quality of the Business Environment Context for Firm Strategy and Rivalry Factor (Input) Conditions Improving access to high quality business inputs Qualified human resources Capital availability Physical infrastructure Scientific and technological infrastructure Administrative and regulatory infrastructure Local rules and incentives that encourage investment and productivity e.g. incentives for capital investments, IP protection Sound corporate governance Open and vigorous local competition Openness to competition Strict competition laws Related and Supporting Industries Availability and quality of suppliers and supporting industries Demand Conditions Sophisticated and demanding local needs e.g., Strict quality, safety, and environmental standards Sophisticated demand in the private sector or government Many things matter for competitiveness Successful economic development is a process of successive upgrading, in which the business environment improves to enable increasingly sophisticated ways of competing 14
The Composition of Regional Economies Serve national and global markets Exposed to competition from other regions Serve almost exclusively the local market Little exposure to international or cross-regional competition for employment Local Clusters `` Traded Clusters Note: Cluster data includes all private, non-agricultural employment. Source: Michael E. Porter, Economic Performance of Regions, Regional Studies (2003); Updated via Cluster Mapping Project, Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness, Harvard Business School (2008) 15
Clusters and Competitiveness Massachusetts Life Sciences 16
Institutions for Collaboration Selected Massachusetts Organizations, Life Sciences Life Sciences Industry Associations Massachusetts Biotechnology Council Massachusetts Medical Device Industry Council Massachusetts Hospital Association University Initiatives Harvard Biomedical Community MIT Enterprise Forum Biotech Club at Harvard Medical School Technology Transfer offices General Industry Associations Informal networks Associated Industries of Massachusetts Company alumni groups Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce Venture capital community High Tech Council of Massachusetts University alumni groups Economic Development Initiatives Joint Research Initiatives Massachusetts Technology Collaborative Mass Biomedical Initiatives Mass Development Massachusetts Alliance for Economic Development New England Healthcare Institute Whitehead Institute For Biomedical Research Center for Integration of Medicine and Innovative Technology (CIMIT) 17
Minneapolis Share of National Employment 2001-2012 3.5% Traded Cluster Composition of the Minneapolis Economy Overall change in the Minneapolis Share of US Traded Employment: -.055% Medical Devices (+.065%, 4.9%), Information Technology and Analytical Instruments 3.0% Insurance Services Printing Services Lighting and Electrical Equipment (+1.1%, 2.9%) 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% Transportation and Logistics Distribution and Electronic Commerce Production Technology and Heavy Machinery Food Processing and Manufacturing Upstream Metal Manufacturing Downstream Chemical Products Communications Equipment and Services Aerospace Vehicles and Defense Metalworking Technology Performing Arts Business Services Wood Products Hospitality and Tourism Plastics Automotive Financial Services Construction Products and Services Marketing, Design, and Publishing Downstream Metal Products Furniture Oil and Gas Production and Transportation Paper and Packaging Education and Knowledge Creation Biopharmaceuticals Electric Power Generation and Transmission Minneapolis Overall Share of US Traded Employment: 1.7% Employment 2001-2012 Lost Jobs 0.0% -0.75% -0.50% -0.25% 0.00% 0.25% 0.50% 0.75% 0.85% Change in Minneapolis Share of National Employment 2001-2012 Employees 15,000 = Source: Prof. Michael E. Porter, Harvard Business School; U.S. Cluster Mapping 2014 Benchmark Definitions (Delgado-Porter-Stern 2013), Richard Bryden, Project Director. 20140929 US Cluster Mapping Launch Event v17 18 Added Jobs
Strong Traded Clusters Drive Regional Performance Research Findings Presence of strong clusters Job growth Breadth of industries within each cluster Higher wages Higher patenting rates Greater new business formation, growth and survival Resilience in downturns Build on the region s existing and emerging clusters rather than chase hot fields Source: Cluster and Entrepreneurship by Mercedes Delgado, Michael E. Porter, and Scott Stern (2010); The Economic Performance of Regions by Michael E. Porter (2003) 19
Related Clusters and Economic Diversification Jewelry & Precious Metals Financial Services Processed Food Business Services Fishing & Fishing Products Agricultural Products Distribution Services Publishing & Printing Transportation & Logistics Education & Knowledge Creation Chemical Products Hospitality & Tourism Information Technology Medical Devices Biopharmaceuticals Entertainment Aerospace Vehicles & Defense Analytical Instruments Tobacco Lighting & Electrical Equipment Communications Services Prefabricated Enclosures Building Fixtures, Equipment & Services Power Generation & Transmission Motor Driven Products Furniture Textiles Heavy Construction Services Heavy Machinery Construction Materials Forest Products Production Technology Coal & Briquettes Footwear Apparel Leather & Related Products Oil & Gas Products Plastics Aerospace Engines Note: Clusters with overlapping borders or identical shading have at least 20% overlap (by number of industries) in both directions. 20 Metal Manufacturing Sporting, Recreational & Children s Goods Automotive Marine Equipment
Strong Traded Clusters Drive Regional Performance Research Findings Presence of strong clusters Job growth Breadth of industries within each cluster Strength in related clusters Higher wages Higher patenting rates Presence of a region s clusters in neighboring regions Greater new business formation, growth and survival Resilience in downturns Build on the region s existing and emerging clusters rather than chase hot fields Economic diversification usually occurs within clusters and across related clusters Source: Cluster and Entrepreneurship by Mercedes Delgado, Michael E. Porter, and Scott Stern (2010); The Economic Performance of Regions by Michael E. Porter (2003) 21
What is an Economic Strategy? Policy Improvement Economic Strategy Implementing best practices in each policy area An overall agenda for creating a more competitive and distinctive position for a country or region, based on its particular circumstances There are a huge number of policy areas that matter No region or country can (or should try to) make progress in all areas simultaneously 22
Developing a Regional Economic Strategy Regional Value Proposition What is a distinctive competitive position for the region given its location, legacy, existing strengths, and potential strengths? What unique advantages as a business location? For what types of activities and clusters? What roles in the surrounding regions, countries, and the global economy? Developing Unique Strengths What elements of the business environment can be unique strengths relative to peers/neighbors? What existing and emerging clusters can be built upon? Achieving and Maintaining Parity with Peers What weaknesses must be addressed to remove key constraints and achieve parity with peer locations? Priorities and sequencing are fundamental to successful economic development 23
Clusters as a Tool for Economic Development Leverages the power of spillovers and linkages to drive rapid economic development A vehicle for policies and investments that strengthen multiple related firms/institutions simultaneously Enhances the efficiency and effectiveness of traditional economic policy areas, such as training, R&D, export promotion, FDI attraction, etc. 24
Organize Public Policy around Clusters Export Promotion Business Attraction Education and Workforce Training Market Information and Disclosure Clusters Science and Technology Infrastructure (e.g., centers, university departments, technology transfer) Quality and Environmental Specialized Physical standards Infrastructure Natural Resource Protection Clusters provide a framework for organizing the implementation of many public policies and public investments directed at economic development 25
Clusters as a Tool for Economic Policy Leverage the power of spillovers and linkages to drive rapid economic development A vehicle for policies and investments that strengthen multiple related firms/institutions simultaneously Enhances the efficiency and effectiveness of traditional economic policy areas, such as training, R&D, export promotion, FDI attraction, etc. A forum for collaboration between the private sector, trade associations, government, educational, and research institutions A mechanism for constructive business-government dialog Brings together firms of all sizes, including SME s Clusters initiatives are a powerful private/public vehicle to identify and get alignment on problems and action recommendations Cluster upgrading fosters greater and more sophisticated competition rather than distorting the market Sound cluster policy addresses all existing and emerging clusters, and does not pick winners 26
U.S. Cluster Mapping National economic initiative based at HBS and sponsored by the U.S. Department of Commerce s Economic Development Administration. To help drive better regional economic strategy, the interactive website provides data to: Help regions understand their current competitiveness and sources of potential differentiation Help clusters assess their competitive position and highlight areas for potential growth Help Institutions for Collaboration engage with peers within and beyond their home region and cluster 27