EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SDG 4 DATA DIGEST The Quality Factor: Strengthening National Data to Monitor Sustainable Development Goal 4

Similar documents
Creating a Global Sharing Network for Strengthening Education Data: edu2030/countrystat. Concept Note 2018/3

ESCAP/RFSD/2018/INF/2

Inter Agency Group on Disaggregated Education Indicators (IAG DEI): Concept note. 10 March 2016

Harnessing the potential for SAIs to contribute to the success of the Sustainable Development Goals

Realisation of the SDGs in Countries Affected by Conflict and Fragility: The Role of the New Deal. Conceptual Note

Realisation of the SDGs in Countries Affected by Conflict and Fragility: The Role of the New Deal Conceptual Note

Building on the recently adopted CEB Common Principles, the 2030 Agenda requires the UN Development System (UNDS) to:

GUIDING FOR ACCOUNTABILITY:

Education for Innovative Societies in the 21st century

United Cities and Local Governments. FOUNDING CONGRESS FINAL DECLARATION Cities, local governments; the future for development Paris 5 May 2004

Education Quality and Classroom Conditions in sub- Saharan Africa: Data to strengthen policymaking and impact

Indicator framework for national SDGs implementation: a mainspring for the statistical developments

CHAPTER 17. SERVICEABILITY AND ACCESSIBILITY OF EXTERNAL SECTOR STATISTICS

SDG 4 monitoring: framework development

Lessons Learned from Global MDG Monitoring

An Open Government framework for the Arab Region

Follow-up and review for the Sustainable Development Goals and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in Asia and the Pacific a background note

EvalAgenda Global Evaluation Agenda Developed by a global, multi-stakeholder consultative process

OECD-IIASA Strategic Partnership on Systems Approaches

What is the role of the UIS?

Executive Board of the United Nations Development Programme and of the United Nations Population Fund

Holistic approach for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda

SDG 4 DATA DIGEST The Quality Factor: Strengthening National Data to Monitor Sustainable Development Goal 4

Prioritizing and Planning the Implementation of Recommendations to Support Country Actions

OIG STRATEGY FOR THE MANAGEMENT

JICA s Position Paper on SDGs: Goal 17

HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE 2030 AGENDA AND THE ROLE OF NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS

Press Kit for the Sustainable Development Summit 2015: Time for Global Action for People and Planet FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Aid Effectiveness in Timor- Leste s WASH Sector

Global review of progress towards SDG 4-Education 2030 targets and commitments. Five key issues and recommendations. Silvia Montoya, UIS Director

Knowledge is power, and information is liberation. Kofi Annan, Former United Nations Secretary-General SUMMARY

Statistics for Transparency, Accountability, and Results

Grade 2, salary from 55,056 up to 68,510 plus benefits

ECOSOC Dialogue The longer-term positioning of the United Nations development system. Session I ECOSOC Chamber, 15 December a.m. 6 p.m.

Governance, Management and Planning

ED-DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK (Ed-DQAF) TO EVALUATE ADMINISTRATIVE ROUTINE DATA SYSTEMS: MANUAL FOR THE CONDUCT OF AN EVALUATION BY A NATIONAL

in practice Ways to improve the implementation of national forest programmes

South Asian forum on the Sustainable Development Goals - New Delhi India Empowering people and ensuring inclusiveness and equality

Speaking Notes for GEM 2016 Launches. Unpacking SDG 4 Education 2030

Aligning international cooperation. with national noncommunicable diseases plans: information note on

UIS light DQAF for administrative data and other UIS CD tools

Adriana Alberti, Chief, Capacity Development Unit

Defining and Implementing the SDG Global and

HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE 2030 AGENDA FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Non-Paper on Supporting the Development of e-democracy in the EU s Eastern Partner Countries

10370/17 YML/ik 1 DG C 1

South African Statistical Quality Assessment Framework

MAKING USE OF COUNTRY RESULTS FRAMEWORKS FOR THE 2030 AGENDA

TCG4: Working Group 3: Measuring SDG 4 Terminology TCG4/30

Message from OPPI Council

QUALITY PHYSICAL EDUCATION. Policy Guidelines Methodology

WHO reform. WHO evaluation policy

P EN. POVERTY ERADICATION NETWORK Strengthening Citizens Participation STRATEGIC PLAN

Sustainable Development and Progress through Statistical Collaboration

Guidelines for the Diagnostic Trade Integration Study (DTIS) and DTIS Update (DTISU) under EIF Phase Two

ACU strategy

Agenda 2030: Sustainable Development Goals

RESPONDING TO THE CHALLENGE

Guidelines for Developing Data Roadmaps for Sustainable Development

European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education

Technical Cooperation Group on the SDG 4 - Education 2030 indicators (TCG) Terms of Reference (Draft)

Central London or Edinburgh Grade 3 salary depending upon experience from 45,361 up to 56,405 (for exceptional candidates)

Evaluation: evaluation policy (2018)

The Framework for PCSD

Statistics Centre Abu Dhabi Charter of Code of Practices

Forum The question of transparency in the financing of sustainable development

SDG10 Expert Group Meeting Reducing Inequalities: Progress and Prospects Geneva, 2-3 April 2019 Agenda

COUNCIL OF EUROPEAN MUNICIPALITIES AND REGIONS CONSEIL DES COMMUNES ET REGIONS D EUROPE

Chapter 6. Data quality

NDP Action Plan Launch. April 2016

A Framework for National Health Policies, Strategies and Plans

Plenary Session 1: Issue Brief- Final DRAFT

Executive Board of the United Nations Development Programme, the United Nations Population Fund and the United Nations Office for Project Services

Process for developing the SDG indicator framework

Montego Bay Declaration) and the outcomes of the 2012 triennale of the Association for the Development of Education in Africa (ADEA)),

HUMAN RIGHTS AND DATA FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Implementing Africa s Ambitious Commitments on Food Security, Agriculture and Nutrition

Steering and Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals

and synergistic action in achieving the 1.5 C goal. With the adoption of the Katowice climate package at COP 24, the world entered a new era,

E-Discussion on the 2018 ECOSOC Main Theme. From global to local: supporting sustainable and resilient societies in urban and rural communities

REPORT PARTNERSHIP FORUM 2018

System of Environmental- Economic Accounting SEEA

Evaluation policy PURPOSE

1. Enhancing relevance of TVET

Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: The Experience of FAO

the Sustainable Development Goals

What are the implications for UNESCO of the proposed post-2015 EFA goals?

Key Recommendations of Local and Regional Governments towards Habitat III MARCH 2016

Information Paper No. 39 March The Data Revolution in Education

COUNTRY ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY A COUNTRY-DRIVEN APPROACH FOR COLLECTIVE IMPACT ON CLIMATE AND DEVELOPMENT ACTION

New York, November 14 th 2015

The SEEA as the Statistical Framework in meeting Data Quality Criteria for SDG indicators

WHERE IS THE MONEY AND WHAT ARE WE DOING WITH IT?

ECOSOC Resolution 2006/14

2018 HLPF Review of SDGs implementation: SDG 12 - Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns

Economic and Social Council

UNESCO CREATIVE CITIES NETWORK (UCCN) BUILDING A COLLECTIVE VISION FOR THE FUTURE STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK

Monitoring Learning Outcomes. Challenges and Opportunities in the 2030 Agenda. Silvia Montoya, PhD. 6 th IEA International Research Conference

Report Revisiting independence, objectivity and the critically reflective role of evaluation for the SDG era Wednesday 25 Friday 27 April 2018 WP1600

Information note I. BACKGROUND

Transcription:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SDG 4 DATA DIGEST 2017 The Quality Factor: Strengthening National Data to Monitor Sustainable Development Goal 4

UNESCO The constitution of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) was adopted by 20 countries at the London Conference in November 1945 and entered into effect on 4 November 1946. The Organization currently has 195 Member States and 10 Associate Members. The main objective of UNESCO is to contribute to peace and security in the world by promoting collaboration among nations through education, science, culture and communication in order to foster universal respect for justice, the rule of law, and the human rights and fundamental freedoms that are affirmed for the peoples of the world, without distinction of race, sex, language or religion, by the Charter of the United Nations. To fulfil its mandate, UNESCO performs five principal functions: 1) prospective studies on education, science, culture and communication for tomorrow s world; 2) the advancement, transfer and sharing of knowledge through research, training and teaching activities; 3) standard-setting actions for the preparation and adoption of internal instruments and statutory recommendations; 4) expertise through technical cooperation to Member States for their development policies and projects; and 5) the exchange of specialized information. UNESCO Institute for Statistics The UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) is the official source of cross-nationally comparable data used to monitor progress towards the Sustainable Development Goal for education (SDG 4) and key targets related to science and culture. As confirmed in the Education 2030 Framework for Action, the UIS has the mandate to work with partners to develop new indicators, statistical approaches and monitoring tools to better assess progress across targets related to UNESCO s mandate. The UIS was established in 1999. It was created to improve UNESCO s statistical programme and to develop and deliver the timely, accurate and policy-relevant statistics needed in today s increasingly complex and rapidly changing social, political and economic environments. Published in 2017 by: UNESCO Institute for Statistics P.O. Box 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7 Canada Tel: +1 514-343-6880 Email: uis.publications@unesco.org http://www.uis.unesco.org ISBN 978-92-9189-221-1 Ref: UIS/2017/ED/SD/15 UNESCO-UIS 2017 Design: JCNicholls Design / www.jcnicholls.com This publication is available in Open Access under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bysa/3.0/igo/). By using the content of this publication, the users accept to be bound by the terms of use of the UNESCO Open Access Repository (http://www. unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization.

Background In the era of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the demand for more and better data has never been so pressing. With their strong emphasis on inclusion and equity, the SDGs compel us to look beyond national and regional averages to ensure that nobody is left behind. SDG 4 on education, for example, calls for a quality education for each and every child by 2030. This ambitious goal is placing pressure on countries to produce and use good quality data on an unprecedented scale. The SDG 4 Data Digest provides information on key data issues confronting countries and the international community. The 2016 edition focused on the necessary indicators to track progress. This year, the focus is on data quality as the foundation for an effective monitoring framework to support the pursuit of SDG 4. In response to the data challenges at the national level, the UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) has developed a set of tools and strategies to enable countries to produce and take ownership of quality data and to help donors target their resources towards the most costeffective approaches. These tools and strategies, set out in the Digest, build on the Institute s longstanding experience in working directly with countries and its mandate as the official source of data, standards and methodologies needed to monitor progress towards SDG 4. Objectives of the SDG 4 Data Digest 2017 The Digest contributes to three key areas that are essential for effective monitoring: Strengthening statistical capacity to support effective implementation of the SDG 4-Education 2030 Agenda at the national, regional and global levels; Incorporating the efforts of donors and partners to improve the quality, reporting and use of education data within national strategies for education statistics that are grounded in national realities and priorities; and Increasing the effectiveness of the resources allocated to countries for their data production and capacity-development activities. Key messages Section 1: Monitoring the international education agenda The first section of the Digest examines the overall context of monitoring the international education agenda, with a focus on existing governance structures and the current indicator frameworks to monitor SDG 4 adopted by the international community. The implementation of these frameworks requires the development and validation of new methodologies and the refinement of existing methodologies to ensure cross-country comparability. The Digest highlights serious challenges with regard to data availability. According to assessments by the UIS in 2016 across 121 countries, the world is currently collecting less than half (47%) of the data needed to monitor progress on the 11 global indicators for SDG 4. The Quality Factor: Strengthening National Data to Monitor Sustainable Development Goal 4 3

When data are available, their quality and scale do not always meet SDG 4 expectations. The disaggregation of data on wealth and disability status, for example, is only possible in 14% and 19% of countries, respectively. In addition, there are data gaps on key SDG 4 concepts, particularly knowledge, skills, learning and school readiness available in only 43% of countries. The Digest argues that the statistical capacity of most countries is being put to the test by the breadth, depth and ambition of the global education goals. The emphasis on equity and the quality of education within the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development requires countries to collect more data from a wider range of sources including: administrative data, financial data, censuses, household surveys as well as national, regional and international learning assessments. Expanding a country s capacity to collect and report data is, clearly, a vital first step. But, as the Digest points out, it is not enough on its own. The other indispensable step is to assess the quality of the data being produced relative to international quality standards. As shown in the Digest, there are 12 characteristics that are often used to validate the quality of data collection and dissemination processes: relevance, accuracy, reliability, coherence, timeliness, punctuality, accessibility, interpretability, objectivity, impartiality, transparency and credibility. The Digest shows that it is essential to organize these characteristics in conceptual frameworks that can be applied systematically to statistical systems to assure the quality of data outputs. Section 2: Producing quality statistics to monitor progress towards SDG 4 The second section of the Digest takes a closer look at how to produce quality statistics, setting out the UIS vision for improving the quality of education data at national and international levels. This vision is grounded in the role of the UIS as the custodian of the majority of education indicators for the SDG 4-Education 2030 Agenda. The Digest sets out a vision for the creation of a SDG 4 Monitoring Compact, based on a pyramid structure (see Figure 1). The model requires strengthening national statistical systems, which are the foundation of the monitoring system, and building international support mechanisms to efficiently produce cross-nationally-comparable indicators. The international community, which includes public and private actors, provides critical support for achieving the global compact for monitoring SDG 4. To enable countries to produce quality data on education at the national level, the UIS proposes a framework and the education data quality assessment framework (Ed-DQAF). This is implemented with a tool that, by assessing the quality of the data production processes followed by countries, makes it possible to produce objective inputs to plan any necessary improvements. Its implementation aims to follow a specific set of good practices to produce quality statistics and examines the presence of an enabling environment, sound data production, and effective data use and dissemination of the different information sources. It is also in line with international technical standards and definitions. 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SDG 4 Data Digest 2017

Figure 1. Components of the data revolution in education SDG 4 Monitoring compact Sustainable Inclusive Transparent Participatory Technically robust International support as enabling factor Enabling environment Roles and responsibilities defined accurately. Participatory approach for methodological developments. Methodologies sensitive to inclusion of all populations. Sound data production Transparency. Robustness. Validation with countries. Inclusiveness of all possible data sources. Data use and dissemination Reduce inter-agency costs of data exchanges. Transfer knowledge and ownership to countries. Peer-learning processes. Country statistical systems as the foundation Enabling environment National strategies for education statistics. Align: - Data to national priorities. - Political commitment and resources to data needs. Inter- and intra-ministry collaboration and stakeholder engagement Sound data production National Education Statistical System: cornerstone of national and global monitoring tools. Integrate data sources to cover all SDG 4 targets and improve quality control. Data use and dissemination Increase data literacy and use of education statistics for policymaking. Serviceability for different stakeholders, including teachers and families. Dissemination of metadata. Source: Adaptation from UNESCO Institute for Statistics, 2017i. It is the task and mandate of the UIS to bring together national-level data and engage in multiple activities to provide internationally-comparable data across education systems and countries. These include producing international standards, such as the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED), defining and establishing methodologies for indicator development, compiling and disseminating international statistics on education through annual data collections directly from Member States or from international organizations, and providing technical support to Member States. By creating a base of internationally-accepted standards, methodologies, definitions and classifications, combined with quality data produced nationally, the Digest show the way forward to ensuring the comparability of data across countries, regions and time. The Quality Factor: Strengthening National Data to Monitor Sustainable Development Goal 4 5

Section 3: Supporting the development of national statistical capacities to monitor SDG 4 To support countries and donors in the monitoring and pursuit of SDG 4, the Digest sets out the UIS model for statistical capacity development (see Figure 2). This is rooted in the formulation of a national indicator framework (NIF) which determines each country s data needs. It follows a comprehensive mapping that identifies the data sources that are already in place, as well as the information gaps, to address the NIF s requirements. The diagnosis stage includes the implementation of data quality assessments on each data source, a key stage which leads to the generation of information for the design of a National Strategy for the Development of Education Statistics (NSDES). The aim is to take a sectoral view of education data and policy priorities and clearly identify what needs to improve in order to link the two more closely together. It represents a systematic way to tackle SDG 4 data challenges. The Ed-DQAF and the capacity development model outlined in the Digest are among a number of strategies and tools produced by the UIS to support national statistical systems, covering three main areas: Mapping tools to help countries identify potential data sources across ministries and national statistical offices, identify gaps, and locate potential opportunities to monitor SDG 4 by integrating different databases, enhancing existing instruments to collect additional data, and producing disaggregated data. Data quality assessment tools to evaluate and strengthen the processes by which countries use different types of data, including administrative records, household surveys, learning assessments and expenditure information. Manuals, guidelines and codes of practice to support the production of education data to provide national policymakers with the evidence they need to plan and monitor the performance of their education systems and progress towards the SDG 4 targets. Figure 2. UIS model of national capacity development Formulation of the National Indicator Framework (NIF) Data mapping Data Quality Assessment Framework (DQAF) Development of the NSDES 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SDG 4 Data Digest 2017

Conclusions The SDG 4 Data Digest positions data quality as crucial for the implementation of SDG monitoring frameworks, based on quality frameworks that are aligned to both national priorities and international technical standards. It stresses the importance of national coordination, backed by international cooperation and support. It sets out the key role of the UIS and its partner agencies as major contributors in terms of data collection, indicator development and strengthening of national data systems for quality monitoring of progress towards SDG 4. The strategies and tools set out in the Digest represent real value added for both countries and donors. The Digest sets out how the UIS provides countries with methodologies and instruments to face the monitoring challenge of the SDG 4-Education 2030 Agenda, aiming to narrow the gap between national statistical capacities and the demands for quality data production. At the same time, donors and international organizations are enabled to minimise transaction costs, improve coordination and collaboration, and gain accurate assessments of capacity-building needs. Together, countries and the international community are equipped to strengthen national statistical capacity that can leverage the power of data in the pursuit of a quality education for every child. The Quality Factor: Strengthening National Data to Monitor Sustainable Development Goal 4 7

Countries are struggling to respond to the unprecedented demand for more and better data associated with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. In education, the international community has agreed to use a set of 11 global indicators and 32 thematic indicators to monitor progress towards Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4. Yet the challenge to produce them is enormous. According to the world s most comprehensive global education database produced by the UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) less than half of countries are currently reporting 19 global and thematic indicators and only 1 global indicator and 6 thematic indicators have coverage exceeding 75%. As the official data source for SDG 4 Education 2030, the UIS works on a daily basis with national statistical offices and ministries of education around the world to collect the data and apply the standards and methodologies needed to produce cross-nationally comparable indicators. The Institute understands the challenges facing national statisticians and is therefore uniquely placed to help countries strengthen their statistical capacities. This report presents a comprehensive strategy and framework to improve the quality of data needed to implement and monitor progress towards the SDG 4 Education 2030 Agenda. It showcases a concrete set of tools designed to help countries strengthen each stage of their national education statistical systems from diagnostic tools to evaluate data availability and quality to the frameworks and guidelines needed to initiate a national strategy for the development of education statistics that directly responds to policy priorities. The report also addresses the wider statistical capacity-development issues facing countries, donors and partners. Above all, the UIS shows the way forward to building better statistical systems by providing national stakeholders with the tools and strategies they need to produce high-quality education data and achieve their development goals. ISBN 978-92-9189-221-1 9 789291 892211 UNESCO Institute for Statistics P.O. Box 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7 Canada