The Bahen Centre for Information Technology. Glazing Studies of the Gallery. Introduction. University of Toronto ~ Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Similar documents
Hourly Analysis Program v.4.1 Page 1 of 1

Hourly Analysis Program v.4.1 Page 1 of 1

Sample Reports. for. HAP v4.80 Example Problem

Ministerio Público Fiscal de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires Fiscalía General Departamento de Infraestructura y Apoyo Operativo

Hourly Analysis Program v.4.1 Page 1 of 1

Sample Reports. for. HAP v4.90 Example Problem

Hourly Analysis Program v.4.1 Page 1 of 1

Hourly Analysis Program v.4.1 Page 1 of 1

COOLING COIL (35% ETHYLENE GLYCOL)

COMMERCIAL LOAD ESTIMATING. Load Estimating Level 3: Block and Zone Loads. Technical Development Program

Selecting Energy Efficient New Windows in Illinois

Selecting Energy Efficient Replacement Windows in Arizona

Diane Emert Senior Thesis 2005 Broadway Plaza, Rochester, MN. Mechanical Appendix

Load Estimation. Ir. Dr. Sam C. M. Hui Faculty of Science and Technology

Selecting Energy Efficient New Windows in Tennessee

Selecting Energy Efficient New Windows in Nevada

Effect of Building Orientation and Window Glazing on the Energy Consumption of HVAC System of an Office Building for Different Climate Zones

5.0 Daylighting Analysis (Breathe Study)

Appendix E-1f: Small Building Methodology for Pre-SB2030 Projects

THE IMPACT OF GLAZING SELECTION ON DAYLIGHTING AND ENERGY PERFORMANCE FOR AN OFFICE BUILDING IN CANBERRA

Cost Benefits of SunGuard SN 54

BUILD WITH LIGHT PERFORMANCE COMPARISON TABLES. Table of Contents

NRC CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY UPDATE

Understanding "Heat Load & Psychometric. by Djunaidi HS

SKYLIGHT DESIGN PERFORMANCE EVALUATION METHOD DEVELOPMENT WITH THERMAL AND DAYLIGHT SIMULATION

Daylight Harvesting in Tropic

Selecting Energy Efficient Replacement Windows in Florida

The Impact of VISIONWALL High Performance Windows on the Northern Telecom Building in Ottawa, Ontario

Amvic Building System. Presented to: Rick Stacey

CAE 331/513 Building Science Fall 2017

171: An urban office designed for the southern Brazilian climate

1 Exam Prep Manual J Residential Load Calculation 8 th Edition Tabs and Highlights

Senior Design Project for UNO. Design of the International Studies Building: An Environmental Analysis

Table Type U-factor SHGC Single pane clear single pane tint double pane clear double pane tint

Glazing with Integral Sun Control Louvres

Modelling Analysis of Thermal Performance of Internal Shading Devices for a Commercial Atrium Building in Tropical Climates

The energy benefits of View Dynamic Glass

INFOTEXT. OKALUX Light Diffusing Insulating Glass. Physical properties

Analysis 2: Alternative Thermal Window Design

Glazing with Integral Sun Control Louvres

OKALUX GmbH Marktheidenfeld Germany Tel.: +49 (0) Fax: +49 (0)

Building Energy Consumption Analysis, Energy Saving Measurements and Verification by Applying HAP Software

Façade Existing Conditions

AREN 3050 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS FOR BUILDINGS I FALL 2005

Cooling Load Calculations

Irvine CA MAE ROW ROW ROW. Office Lighting Plan. Page 93

Window Options. Keeping cool in summer, warm in winter, comfortable all the time,... and saving energy too

DAYLIGHTING. 5.1 Introduction{ TC "5.1 Introduction" \l 2 } { TC "'CHAPTER FIVE: DAYLIGHTING'" \l 1 }CHAPTER FIVE

Modeling Energy Consumption Effects of Glazing

Glazing with Integral Sun Control Louvres

Sound insulation Capillary slabs decouple the panes of the insulating glazing and provide improved sound insulation.

Design Charrette. New York State Energy Research and Development Authority 17 Columbia Circle Albany, NY NYSERDA

European Timber Windows & Doors

Daylight and Views - daylight

Great Homes Checklist - Passive Solar Design. Energy Center fact sheet 4/2006

Curtainwalls. Brussels Window. Objectives. Windows & Curtainwalls. Curtainwalls. 1 R2 R3. High tech? Low tech?

Optimizing Benefits of Multiple-Slat Shading Device and High Performance Glazing on High-Rise Buildings

SURNA Grow Facility: Systems Comparison - IEA

Loyola/Notre Dame Library Expansion & Renovation

Activity 2.2.3A Heat Loss and Gain (Revised)

Introduction to basics of energy efficient building design

Lecture 3: Utilization of Passive Solar Technology

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. Contents Overview WHAT'S IN THE SWL PRINTED WHAT'S IN THE SWL ELECTRONIC I NAVIGATION 20 VIII DETAILED DESIGN STRATEGIES E.

COOLING LOAD ESTIMATION OF A ROOM

High Performance Roof Daylighting

INVESTIGATION INTO THE THERMAL IMPACT OF WINDOW-TO-WALL RATIO, BUILDING ORIENTATION AND GLAZING MATERIAL ON OFFICE SPACES

Energy Rating for Residential Buildings in Amman

Chapter 7. Passive Solar Contents

Wall 1. indoor air film ½ gypsum board ½ sound deadening board. stud (dg. fir) w/3.5 Ins. Wood Bevel Lapped Siding (0.75 x10 ) outdoor air film

REC HVAC Load Calculations

Load Calculations Heat Balance Method - Example. Prof. Jeffrey D. Spitler School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Oklahoma State University

An enhancement of the daylighting from side-window using two-section venetian blind

What s My Baseline? ASHRAE

ENERGY STAR Qualifying Criteria for Residential Windows, Doors, and Skylights Sold in Canada Version 3.0 October 1, 2010

Digging Deeper SOLAR ENERGY. Forms of Solar Energy

half of the energy transmitted from the sun is in the visible light wavelengths.

Assessing the energy performance of modern glass facade systems

UT Zero-Energy House Divide University of Tennessee, Knoxville Arc 572 I Spring 2008

Chapter 6. Space heating load

NRC Publications Archive Archives des publications du CNRC

GLASS SELECTION GUIDE

ADVANCED FAÇADES AND HVAC SYSTEMS: PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF FULL-SCALE MONITORING

Thermal Performance of Toplighting Systems in a Hot and Humid Climate: Thailand

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL STANDARD

Sustainable Building Façade and Advanced Fenestration Systems

INTUITIVE AND OBJECTIVE APPROACHES TO DAYLIGHTING A NEW ENGLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Michael Rosenfeld 1

A Case Study on the Daylighting and Thermal Effects of Fixed and Motorized Light Louvers

Selection of Glass and its effect on Heat Load Estimation

Building Load and Energy Estimates Analysis. Instructor: Dr. Mumma. October 28, Thesis Building Sponsor s: INOVA Fairfax Hospital

C H A P T E R 3. Completing the Residential Analysis Worksheet STEP 1: WINDOWS AND OTHER GLASS AREAS

HOW CURRENT TRENDS IN THE DESIGN OF FACADES INFLUENCE THE FUNCTIONAL QUALITY OF INTERIOR SPACES

NEED FOR A CORRECT GLASS DESCRIPTIVE CODE: ENERGY-CODING

Analysis of different shading strategies on energy demand and operating cost of office building

Italcementi Center for Research and Innovation

ENERGY ANALYSIS AND ENERGY CONSERVATION OPTION FOR THE WAREHOUSE FACILITY AT THE HUMAN SERVICES CENTER COMPLEX DRAFT REPORT.

CHAPTER 3. BUILDING THERMAL LOAD ESTIMATION

LoE LoE LoE-i89 Clear & Grey. Glassworks performance range

Glassworks Pty Ltd in Melbourne, Australia. Self-Tinting Interlayer for Dynamic Windows. In Alliance with

DAYLIGHTING PERFORMANCE OF TOPLIGHTING SYSTEMS IN THE HOT AND HUMID CLIMATE OF THAILAND

Transcription:

Glazing Studies of the Gallery Introduction The gallery in the Bahen Centre is a circulation space located in the northeast side of the building. One side of the corridor composed of the walls of an auditorium and a large computer lab. The other side is constructed of large windows throughout the entire length of the corridor. Due to the fact that materials used in windows has some of the lowest resistance (R) values, it is worth analyzing how efficient the windows of the gallery corridor is at insulating heat in the winter, and keeping heat out in the summer. If the windows perform poorly, it could cause extra use of the heating and cooling load in the building, increasing the cost of building operation. On the other hand, if the glazing of the windows is highly efficient, then money can be saved with the decreased heating and cooling load of the building. This glazing analysis will examine the use of a few different glazing types, including glazing that are uncoated, coated, and glazing with different properties. Since no information on the glazing on the existing design was available, this analysis will also serve as a way to determine what type of glazing will be the most suitable in a building like the Bahen Centre. The heating and cooling loads related to the use of the different glazing in the gallery space will be analyzed as the mechanical component, along with a brief analysis on the shading effect on daylight of the different glazing. The mechanical analysis will be performed with the use of the Carrier Hourly Analysis Program 4.10 (HAP), and the daylight component will be analyzed by using the daylight function of the lighting software Luxicon. 84

Figure 10.1 ~ Gallery Factors to analyze The basis of the comparison for the glazing in the Gallery space is to examine the insulation and transmittance properties of the different types of glazing. The four major characteristics for comparison are listed as follow: U-Value Gallery The U value is the overall coefficient of heat transmission. It represents the rate of heat flow through surfaces, which could be layers of materials, air space, or combinations of such. A low U-Value corresponds to a lower the heat flow through the glazing, making it a more insulated material. U-value is equal to the inverse sum of the material resistance (R): U=1/ R The unit of the U-value is Btu/h ft 2 F. Shading Coefficient Large window panes facing east onto St. George Street The shading coefficient (SC) represents insulating ability of a glazing material has when it encounters sunlight. The coefficient depends on the tint of the glass, type of glass, reflective coatings, and shading 85

by other objects. The lower the shading coefficient, the more insulated the glazing is. The U value and shading coefficient will be used to analyze the ability of the glazing to withstand the outdoor environment. This study is particularly useful for the Bahen Centre, since it is located in Toronto, Canada, where there are some of the coldest winters and very hot summers. Transmittance The transmittance value represents the fraction of the incident amount of light in the visible spectrum that is allowed to pass through a transparent material. Although this factor does not play a large role in the contribution or reduction of heat gain in a space, the visual quality of the glazing with different transmittance will still be analyzed (by using a daylight analysis software, such as Luxicon). Glazing All comparison will be done on glazing with thickness of ¼ for ease of evaluation. Data for this analysis is obtained from the glass manufacturer PPG Industries. Five different glazing types are tested in this glazing analysis: STARPHIRE Glass (uncoated) CLEAR Glass (uncoated) AZURIA Glass (uncoated) SOLARCOOL AZURIA Glass (coated) SUNGATE 100 AZURIA Glass (Low-E) The corresponding properties and U-values of these glazing types are listed on the next two pages (Table 10.1 and 10.2). These values are inputted into the Hourly Analysis Program (HAP) to obtain the cooling and heating load for the gallery space, with that specific type of glazing being used on the east facing windows. Reflectance Another factor that has no effect on the heat gain properties of the material. However, the reflectance of the materials will be considered internally as it will reflect a certain amount of light back into the gallery corridor, aiding in the illumination of the space. 86

Table of Performance Values Glass Thickness Transmittance Reflectance U-Value (Imperial) K-Value (Metric) Shading Solar Light to Ultra- Total Visible Total Winter Summer Winter Summer Coeffi- Heat Solar violet Visible Solar Light Solar Night- Day- Night- Day- cient Gain Gain Inches mm % % Energy % % Energy % time time time time Coefficent (LSG) Uncoated STARPHIRE Glass 3/16 5 86 91 90 8 8 1.10 1.00 6.23 5.67 1.05 0.90 1.01 1/4 6 85 91 89 8 8 1.09 1.00 6.19 5.65 1.04 0.90 1.01 5/16 8 83 91 88 8 8 1.07 0.98 6.09 5.58 1.03 0.89 1.02 3/8 10 82 91 87 8 8 1.06 0.98 6.03 5.54 1.03 0.88 1.02 1/2 12 80 91 86 8 8 1.04 0.96 5.89 5.45 1.02 0.87 1.04 Uncoated CLEAR Glass 3/16 5 68 89 79 9 7 1.10 1.03 6.23 5.85 0.96 0.83 1.07 1/4 6 65 89 77 9 7 1.09 1.03 6.19 5.85 0.94 0.81 1.10 5/16 8 60 87 72 8 7 1.07 1.03 6.09 5.83 0.90 0.78 1.12 3/8 10 57 87 69 8 7 1.06 1.02 6.03 5.81 0.88 0.76 1.14 1/2 12 52 85 63 8 6 1.04 1.02 5.89 5.76 0.83 0.71 1.20 Table 10.1 ~ Table of Performance Values of various glazing types 87

Table of Performance Values Glass Thickness Transmittance Reflectance U-Value (Imperial) K-Value (Metric) Shading Solar Light to Ultra- Total Visible Total Winter Summer Winter Summer Coeffi- Heat Solar violet Visible Solar Light Solar Night- Day- Night- Day- cient Gain Gain Inches mm % % Energy % % Energy % time time time time Coefficent (LSG) Uncoated AZURIA Glass 1/8 3.2 53 77 45 7 6 1.11 1.12 6.30 6.34 0.68 0.59 1.31 3/16 5 46 71 36 7 5 1.10 1.12 6.24 6.36 0.61 0.53 1.34 1/4 6 42 67 32 7 5 1.09 1.12 6.19 6.35 0.58 0.50 1.34 5/16 8 34 60 26 6 5 1.07 1.11 6.09 6.31 0.52 0.45 1.33 3/8 10 31 56 23 6 5 1.06 1.10 6.03 6.27 0.50 0.43 1.30 Coated SOLARCOOL (2) AZURIA Glass 1/4 6 12 26 14 19 9 1.09 1.14 6.21 6.48 0.41 0.36 0.72 Insulating Glass (1" unit using 1/4" glass) SUNGATE 100 (3) Azuria Low-E Tinted Insulating Glass 1/4 6-55 - 9-0.31 0.34 - - 0.37 0.32 - Table 10.2 ~ Table of Performance Values for various glazing types 88

DESIGN COOLING DESIGN HEATING COOLING DATA AT Jul 1000 HEATING DATA AT DES HTG COOLING OA DB / WB 75.7 F / 67.6 F HEATING OA DB / WB -4.0 F / -5.3 F Sensible Latent Sensible Latent ZONE LOADS Details (BTU/hr) (BTU/hr) Details (BTU/hr) (BTU/hr) Window & Skylight Solar Loads 1347 ft² 102299-1347 ft² - - Wall Transmission 317 ft² 417-317 ft² 5281 - Roof Transmission 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Window Transmission 1347 ft² -108-1347 ft² 99692 - Skylight Transmission 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Door Loads 100 ft² 1073-100 ft² 4837 - Floor Transmission 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Partitions 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Ceiling 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Overhead Lighting 3193 W 10015-0 0 - Task Lighting 0 W 0-0 0 - Electric Equipment 0 W 0-0 0 - People 6 1510 1620 0 0 0 Infiltration - 0 0-0 0 Miscellaneous - 0 0-0 0 Safety Factor 0% / 0% 0 0 0% 0 0 >> Total Zone Loads - 115206 1620-109810 0 Zone Conditioning - 108283 1620-107607 0 Plenum Wall Load 0% 0-0 0 - Plenum Roof Load 0% 0-0 0 - Plenum Lighting Load 0% 0-0 0 - Return Fan Load 5450 CFM 4244-5450 CFM -2292 - Ventilation Load 75 CFM -210 1618 41 CFM 3166 0 Supply Fan Load 4559 CFM 4244-2463 CFM -2292 - Space Fan Coil Fans - 0 - - 0 - Duct Heat Gain / Loss 0% 0-0% 0 - >> Total System Loads - 116560 3238-106188 0 Central Cooling Coil - 116560 3242-0 0 Central Heating Coil - 0 - - 106188 - >> Total Conditioning - 116560 3242-106188 0 Table 10.3 ~ Design cooling and design heating load for STARPHIRE Glass 89

DESIGN COOLING DESIGN HEATING COOLING DATA AT Jul 1000 HEATING DATA AT DES HTG COOLING OA DB / WB 75.7 F / 67.6 F HEATING OA DB / WB -4.0 F / -5.3 F Sensible Latent Sensible Latent ZONE LOADS Details (BTU/hr) (BTU/hr) Details (BTU/hr) (BTU/hr) Window & Skylight Solar Loads 1347 ft² 92462-1347 ft² - - Wall Transmission 317 ft² 417-317 ft² 5281 - Roof Transmission 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Window Transmission 1347 ft² -111-1347 ft² 102683 - Skylight Transmission 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Door Loads 100 ft² 969-100 ft² 4950 - Floor Transmission 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Partitions 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Ceiling 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Overhead Lighting 3193 W 10015-0 0 - Task Lighting 0 W 0-0 0 - Electric Equipment 0 W 0-0 0 - People 6 1510 1620 0 0 0 Infiltration - 0 0-0 0 Miscellaneous - 0 0-0 0 Safety Factor 0% / 0% 0 0 0% 0 0 >> Total Zone Loads - 105263 1620-112914 0 Zone Conditioning - 98276 1620-110377 0 Plenum Wall Load 0% 0-0 0 - Plenum Roof Load 0% 0-0 0 - Plenum Lighting Load 0% 0-0 0 - Return Fan Load 4975 CFM 3854-4975 CFM -2342 - Ventilation Load 75 CFM -208 1606 46 CFM 3536 0 Supply Fan Load 4140 CFM 3854-2516 CFM -2342 - Space Fan Coil Fans - 0 - - 0 - Duct Heat Gain / Loss 0% 0-0% 0 - >> Total System Loads - 105777 3226-109228 0 Central Cooling Coil - 105777 3231-0 0 Central Heating Coil - 0 - - 109228 - >> Total Conditioning - 105777 3231-109228 0 Table 10.4 ~ Design cooling and design heating load for CLEAR Glass 90

DESIGN COOLING DESIGN HEATING COOLING DATA AT Jul 1400 HEATING DATA AT DES HTG COOLING OA DB / WB 86.4 F / 70.8 F HEATING OA DB / WB -4.0 F / -5.3 F Sensible Latent Sensible Latent ZONE LOADS Details (BTU/hr) (BTU/hr) Details (BTU/hr) (BTU/hr) Window & Skylight Solar Loads 1347 ft² 44444-1347 ft² - - Wall Transmission 317 ft² 881-317 ft² 5281 - Roof Transmission 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Window Transmission 1347 ft² 11659-1347 ft² 111655 - Skylight Transmission 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Door Loads 100 ft² 1250-100 ft² 5288 - Floor Transmission 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Partitions 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Ceiling 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Overhead Lighting 3193 W 10208-0 0 - Task Lighting 0 W 0-0 0 - Electric Equipment 0 W 0-0 0 - People 6 1548 1620 0 0 0 Infiltration - 0 0-0 0 Miscellaneous - 0 0-0 0 Safety Factor 0% / 0% 0 0 0% 0 0 >> Total Zone Loads - 69990 1620-122224 0 Zone Conditioning - 63831 1620-117852 0 Plenum Wall Load 0% 0-0 0 - Plenum Roof Load 0% 0-0 0 - Plenum Lighting Load 0% 0-0 0 - Return Fan Load 3308 CFM 2510-3308 CFM -2449 - Ventilation Load 73 CFM 631 1556 72 CFM 5492 0 Supply Fan Load 2696 CFM 2510-2630 CFM -2449 - Space Fan Coil Fans - 0 - - 0 - Duct Heat Gain / Loss 0% 0-0% 0 - >> Total System Loads - 69481 3176-118447 0 Central Cooling Coil - 69481 3181-0 0 Central Heating Coil - 0 - - 118447 - >> Total Conditioning - 69481 3181-118447 0 Table 10.5 ~ Design cooling and design heating load for AZURIA Glass 91

DESIGN COOLING DESIGN HEATING COOLING DATA AT Jul 1500 HEATING DATA AT DES HTG COOLING OA DB / WB 87.0 F / 71.0 F HEATING OA DB / WB -4.0 F / -5.3 F Sensible Latent Sensible Latent ZONE LOADS Details (BTU/hr) (BTU/hr) Details (BTU/hr) (BTU/hr) Window & Skylight Solar Loads 1347 ft² 30132-1347 ft² - - Wall Transmission 317 ft² 925-317 ft² 5281 - Roof Transmission 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Window Transmission 1347 ft² 12839-1347 ft² 113649 - Skylight Transmission 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Door Loads 100 ft² 1100-100 ft² 5363 - Floor Transmission 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Partitions 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Ceiling 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Overhead Lighting 3193 W 10249-0 0 - Task Lighting 0 W 0-0 0 - Electric Equipment 0 W 0-0 0 - People 6 1556 1620 0 0 0 Infiltration - 0 0-0 0 Miscellaneous - 0 0-0 0 Safety Factor 0% / 0% 0 0 0% 0 0 >> Total Zone Loads - 56800 1620-124293 0 Zone Conditioning - 50674 1620-118798 0 Plenum Wall Load 0% 0-0 0 - Plenum Roof Load 0% 0-0 0 - Plenum Lighting Load 0% 0-0 0 - Return Fan Load 2693 CFM 1998-2693 CFM -2436 - Ventilation Load 72 CFM 668 1508 87 CFM 6660 0 Supply Fan Load 2146 CFM 1998-2617 CFM -2436 - Space Fan Coil Fans - 0 - - 0 - Duct Heat Gain / Loss 0% 0-0% 0 - >> Total System Loads - 55337 3128-120586 0 Central Cooling Coil - 55337 3129-0 0 Central Heating Coil - 0 - - 120586 - >> Total Conditioning - 55337 3129-120586 0 Table 10.6 ~ Design cooling and design heating load for SOLARCOOL AZURIA Glass 92

DESIGN COOLING DESIGN HEATING COOLING DATA AT Jul 1000 HEATING DATA AT DES HTG COOLING OA DB / WB 75.7 F / 67.6 F HEATING OA DB / WB -4.0 F / -5.3 F Sensible Latent Sensible Latent ZONE LOADS Details (BTU/hr) (BTU/hr) Details (BTU/hr) (BTU/hr) Window & Skylight Solar Loads 1347 ft² 36395-1347 ft² - - Wall Transmission 317 ft² 417-317 ft² 5281 - Roof Transmission 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Window Transmission 1347 ft² -37-1347 ft² 33895 - Skylight Transmission 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Door Loads 100 ft² 381-100 ft² 2361 - Floor Transmission 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Partitions 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Ceiling 0 ft² 0-0 ft² 0 - Overhead Lighting 3193 W 10015-0 0 - Task Lighting 0 W 0-0 0 - Electric Equipment 0 W 0-0 0 - People 6 1510 1620 0 0 0 Infiltration - 0 0-0 0 Miscellaneous - 0 0-0 0 Safety Factor 0% / 0% 0 0 0% 0 0 >> Total Zone Loads - 48682 1620-41537 0 Zone Conditioning - 44585 1620-40641 0 Plenum Wall Load 0% 0-0 0 - Plenum Roof Load 0% 0-0 0 - Plenum Lighting Load 0% 0-0 0 - Return Fan Load 2301 CFM 1752-2301 CFM -869 - Ventilation Load 74 CFM -201 1535 37 CFM 2847 0 Supply Fan Load 1882 CFM 1752-933 CFM -869 - Space Fan Coil Fans - 0 - - 0 - Duct Heat Gain / Loss 0% 0-0% 0 - >> Total System Loads - 47888 3155-41750 0 Central Cooling Coil - 47888 3160-0 0 Central Heating Coil - 0 - - 41750 - >> Total Conditioning - 47888 3160-41750 0 Table 10.7 ~ Design cooling and design heating load for SUNGATE 100 AZURIA Low-E Glass 93

For Toronto, Ontario, Canada Latitude = 43.7 Longitude = 79.6 Elevation = 568.0 ft Cooling Load Heating Load Btu/hr Ton Btu/hr Ton STARPHIRE 116560 9.71 106188 8.85 CLEAR 105777 8.81 109228 9.10 AZURIA 69481 5.79 118447 9.87 SOLARCOOL AZURIA 55337 4.61 120586 10.05 SUNGATE AZURIA LOW-E 47888 3.99 41750 3.48 Table 10.8 ~ Summary of cooling and heating load with the use of different glazing Peak Cooling and Heating Load Analysis Result From the cooling and heating load analysis performed in the Hourly Analysis Program (HAP), the two best glazing are the SOLARCOOL AZURIA, and SUNGATE LOW-E AZURIA glass. They are considered as the best in regards to their ability to minimize heat loss in the winter and heat gain in the summer. The use of the glazing can lower the cooling and heating load, which in the end result in cost savings. 94

Daylight Availability The two best glazing resulted from the previous analysis will be further examined for their transmittance and reflectance properties when interacting with daylight. These two glazing (SOLARCOOL AZURIA and SUNGATE LOW-E AZURIA) will be used in a test corridor in Luxicon that has the same width as the Gallery but only half on its length. This analysis will examine the ability of the glazing to transmit or reflect sunlight. Figure 10.2 ~ Plan view of a section of the Gallery corridor Glazing sunlight can penetrate into the space through the glass. The amount of penetration into the space will be the same up and down the corridor; therefore there is no need to analyze the entire 120 ft long corridor. The Luxicon analysis will be performed on two different times of the year, at two different time of the day with two different sky conditions: Month Time Sky Condition June December 12:00pm 12:00pm Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy 5:00pm 4:00pm Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy The results will be shown in horizontal illumination distribution (at 0 ft, floor level) contour caused by the daylight, and the other will be a shaded plot, which can provide a more realistic look of the lighting distribution into the space. The window plane in the Gallery is approximately 9.87 ft high and runs along the entire length of the corridor (120 ft). The corridor model to be tested in Luxicon will have the same width (18.3 ft) as the Gallery but only half of the length (60 ft) of the actual Gallery space. This is because the only factor that is important for this analysis is how far the 95

SOLARCOOL (2) AZURIA Glass June 19, 12:00pm, Clear Sky June 19, 12:00pm, Cloudy Sky 96

SOLARCOOL (2) AZURIA Glass June 19, 5:00pm, Clear Sky June 19, 5:00pm, Cloudy Sky 97

SOLARCOOL (2) AZURIA Glass December 19, 12:00pm, Clear Sky December 19, 12:00pm, Cloudy Sky 98

SOLARCOOL (2) AZURIA Glass December 19, 4:00pm, Clear Sky December 19, 4:00pm, Cloudy Sky 99

SUNGATE 100 (3) AZURIA LOW-E Glass June 19, 12:00pm, Clear Sky June 19, 12:00pm, Cloudy Sky 100

SUNGATE 100 (3) AZURIA LOW-E Glass June 19, 5:00pm, Clear Sky June 19, 5:00pm, Cloudy Sky 101

SUNGATE 100 (3) AZURIA LOW-E Glass December 19, 12:00pm, Clear Sky December 19, 12:00pm, Cloudy Sky 102

SUNGATE 100 (3) AZURIA LOW-E Glass December 19, 4:00pm, Clear Sky December 19, 4:00pm, Cloudy Sky 103

Daylight Availability Results The daylight analysis demonstrates the effects the different transmittance and reflectance values of each glazing type. The SOLARCOOL AZURIA glass has a lower transmittance value, permitting less sunlight to transmit through the windows. On the other hand, the SOLARGATE LOW-E AZURIA glass has a transmittance value almost double that of the SOLARCOOL glazing. This may cause the gallery space to receive excess sunlight. However, since it is a corridor space, glare problem is less of an issue and therefore the excessive light will not cause any major problems. Conclusion From the cooling/heating load analysis and the daylight availability analysis, SOLARGATE Low-E AZURIA glass from PPG Industries resulted to be the best glazing for the use in the gallery. Its insulation ability reduces the heating and cooling load of the building dramatically (more than 50% of original load if existing glass is CLEAR glass), resulting in a large potential in cost savings. 104