Thermodynamic performance of IGCC with oxycombustion

Similar documents
Thermodynamic Performance of IGCC with Oxy-Combustion CO 2 Capture

Process simulation activities at Politecnico di Milano on Ca-based solid looping cycles

BLUE OPTION White space is filled with one or more photos

CO 2 Capture from Natural Gas Combined Cycles

Performance Evaluation of a Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycle Coal Gasification Plant

Problematica e Tecnologie per la cattura di CO 2 Stefano Consonni Dipartimento di Energetica - Politecnico di Milano

Scott Hume. Electric Power Research Institute, 1300 West WT Harris Blvd, Charlotte NC 28262

Reforming Natural Gas for CO 2 pre-combustion capture in Combined Cycle power plant

Improving Flexibility of IGCC for Harmonizing with Renewable Energy - Osaki CoolGen s Efforts -

CO 2 recovery from CPU vent of CFB oxyfuel plants by Ca-looping process

Design Optimisation of the Graz Cycle Prototype Plant

Perspective on Coal Utilization Technology

A Further Step Towards a Graz Cycle Power Plant for CO 2 Capture

Development status of the EAGLE Gasification Pilot Plant

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 114 (2017 )

COAL POWER PLANTS WITH CO 2 CAPTURE: THE IGCC OPTION

A novel CO 2 -capturing natural gas combined cycle with LNG cold energy utilization

The Progress of Osaki CoolGen Project

Techno-Economic Assessment of Oxy-Combustion Turbine Power Plants with CO 2 Capture

Benchmarking of power cycles with CO 2 capture The impact of the chosen framework

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 180B CARBON CAPTURE FROM COAL FIRED POWER GENERATION (DECEMBER 2008 REPUBLISHED MARCH 2009)

Available online at Energy Procedia 4 (2011) Energy Procedia 00 (2010) GHGT-10

Available online at Energy Procedia 4 (2011) Energy Procedia 00 (2010)

CALCIUM LOOPING PROCESS FOR CLEAN FOSSIL FUEL CONVERSION. Shwetha Ramkumar, Robert M. Statnick, Liang-Shih Fan. Daniel P. Connell

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 114 (2017 )

Advanced Modelling of IGCC-Power Plant Concepts

TRONDHEIM CCS CONFERENCE

- The Osaki CoolGen Project -

CO 2 Capture: Impacts on IGCC Plant Performance in a High Elevation Application using Western Sub-Bituminous Coal

Paolo Chiesa. Politecnico di Milano. Tom Kreutz*, Bob Williams. Princeton University

THE ASSESSMENT OF A WATER-CYCLE FOR CAPTURE OF CO2

Coal gasification and CO 2 capture

Fossil Energy. Fossil Energy Technologies. Chapter 12, #1. Access (clean HH fuel) Coal. Air quality (outdoor)

Coal based IGCC technology

J-POWER s CCT Activities

Air Separation Unit for Oxy-Coal Combustion Systems

MIT Carbon Sequestration Forum VII Pathways to Lower Capture Costs

1. Process Description:

UOP Selexol TM Technology Applications for CO 2 Capture

Flexible Integration of the sco 2 Allam Cycle with Coal Gasification for Low-Cost, Emission-Free Electricity Generation

Analysis of flexibility options for electricity generating projects with pre-combustion capture of CO 2

Methanol Production by Gasification of Heavy Residues

An Update On Shell Licensed Gasification Projects and the Performance of Pernis IGCC

NOx CONTROL FOR IGCC FACILITIES STEAM vs. NITROGEN

Techno-economic assessment of two novel feeding systems for a dry-feed gasifier in an IGCC plant with Pdmembranes for CO[subscript 2] capture

The Cost of Mercury Removal in an IGCC Plant

Ronald L. Schoff Parsons Corporation George Booras Electric Power Research Institute

Reducing CO 2 Emission by Hydrogen IGCC Power Plants. Hydrogen IGCC

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NGCC AND COAL-FIRED STEAM POWER PLANTS WITH INTEGRATED CCS AND ORC SYSTEMS

GASIFICATION TECHNOLOGIES 2003

Chilled Ammonia Technology for CO 2 Capture. October, 2006

Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants

Chemical Looping Gasification Sulfur By-Product

Available online at Energy Procedia 4 (2011) Energy Procedia 00 (2010) GHGT-10

Focus on Gasification in the Western U.S.

Energy Conversion and Management

Available online at. Looping. stagess of this Ca-Cu. a dynamic 1D. of 4.7 MJ/kgCO2. in electric efficiencies. of around 48% LHV and SPECCA

Advanced Coal Power Plant Water Usage

Advanced Hydrogen and CO 2 Capture Technology for Sour Syngas

sco 2 Cycle as an Efficiency Improvement Opportunity for Air-Fired Coal Combustion

CCS system modelling: enabling technology to help accelerate commercialisation and manage technology risk

Hydrogen and power co-generation based on syngas and solid fuel direct chemical looping systems

CO 2. Capture: Comparison of Cost & Performance of Gasification and Combustion-based Plants

Comparison of a New Warm-Gas Desulfurization Process versus Traditional Scrubbers for a Commercial IGCC Power Plant

Carbon Capture Options for LNG Liquefaction

Production of Electric Power and Chemicals in a Carbon Constrained Environment

Lurgi s MPG Gasification plus Rectisol Gas Purification Advanced Process Combination for Reliable Syngas Production

An Opportunity for Methanol; the Production Starting from Coal

Towards 2 nd generation of IGCC plants Nuon Magnum multi-fuel power plant Robert de Kler, May 2009

High-efficiency low LCOE combined cycles for sour gas oxy-combustion with CO[subscript 2] capture

Heat Integration of an Oxy-Combustion Process for Coal- Fired Power Plants with CO 2 Capture by Pinch Analysis

THE NOVELEDGE IGCC REFERENCE PLANT: COST AND EMISSIONS REDUCTION POTENTIAL. Gasification Technologies 2004, Washington, DC, October 6, 2004

Available online at Energy Procedia 4 (2011) Energy Procedia 00 (2010) GHGT-10

Techno-Economic Assessment of Co-gasification of Coal-Petcoke and Biomass in IGCC Power Plants

Integration of carbon capture unit with power generation: technology advances in oxy-combustion plants

SOME ENERGY-EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGIES IN JAPAN

2. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT

Course of Energy Conversion A 2014/2015

The Future of IGCC Technology CCPC-EPRI IGCC Roadmap Results

Future Gen An Interested Party s Perspective

Refinery Residue Based IGCC Power Plants and Market Potential

IGCC Plants : a Practical Pathway for Combined Production of Hydrogen and Power from Fossil Fuels

Potential of Allam cycle with natural gas to reduce carbon dioxide emission in India

Air Products Pressure Swing Adsorption at the National Carbon Capture Center

Development of the Highly Durable COS Hydrolysis Catalyst for IGCC Gas Clean-up System

A Parametric Investigation of Integrated Gasification Combined Cycles with Carbon Capture

Optimal Design Technologies for Integration of Combined Cycle Gas Turbine Power Plant with CO 2 Capture

with Physical Absorption

Integrated Gasification Fuel Cell Performance and Cost Assessment

The answer of CFB technology to the greenhouse gas problem: CO 2 postcombustion capture and oxycombustion in supercritical CFB boilers

Energy Procedia

Design Parameters Affecting the Commercial Post Combustion CO 2 Capture Plants

Combined Heat and Power

OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE AND CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS.

Post Combustion CO 2 Capture Scale Up Study

EFFECT OF AMBIENT TEMPERATURE, GAS TURBINE INLET TEMPERATURE AND COMPRESSOR PRESSURE RATIO ON PERFORMANCE OF COMBINED CYCLE POWER PLANT

Purification of Oxyfuel Derived CO 2 for Sequestration or EOR

Advances in gasification plants for low carbon power and hydrogen co-production

THE HOT GAS DESULFURIZATION IN A COMPACT TWO BEDS SYSTEM INTEGRATED WITH COAL GASIFICATION AND FISHER-TROPSCH SYSTEM

UPDATE ON THE KEMPER COUNTY IGCC PROJECT Gasification Technologies Conference

Transcription:

Thermodynamic performance of IGCC with oxycombustion CO 2 capture G.Lozza, M. Romano, A. Giuffrida Dip. Energia, Politecnico di Milano, Italy

Purpose of the study CO 2 capture from coal power plant. Configurations proposed: USC with amine capture or with oxy-combustion IGCC with pre-combustion capture Investigate novel plant configurations, to obtain better thermodynamic and environmental performance Near-term solutions requiring the development of components not available in today s marketplace, but not requiring unproven technologies Investigated configurations: Reference IGCC, without and with capture Oxy-combustion, with semi-closed H 2 O-CO 2 power cycle, present technology Oxy-combustion, with co-capture capture CO 2 -SO 2, advanced technology Oxy-combustion, Hot Gas Desulfurization, advanced technology Detailed thermodynamic analysis and optimization

The reference cases Calculations by means GS code, developed in our Department and used for power plant on-design performance prediction No capture: A status-of-the-art IGCC combined cycle based: An oxygen-blown dry-feed entrained-flow gasifier (Shell type) Syngas cooling by syngas quench and HP steam gen. Power cycle based on a FB-technology gas turbine With pre-combustion capture: Same basic plant configuration and calculation assumptions CO conversion to hydrogen by means of two Water-Gas-Shift reactors (HT: bulk conversion, LT: finishing ) H 2 S/CO 2 removal by Selexol in two separate absorbers; largest solvent fraction for CO 2 removal with pressure-swing swing regeneration; smaller fraction for H 2 S removal with stripper regeneration.

Pre-combustion CO 2 capture 4 gasification island 8 9 slag 10 12 scrubber ECO EVA+SH 11 to HP 24 dry solids removal 13 14 B A HT-WGS 30 to LP 16 17 15 LP- EVA LT- WGS HP-EVA 19 A saturator 18 25 4 20 21 3 B 2 22 from HP power island from LP, to Selexol and sour water strippers heat recovery steam generator 26 27 28 29 1 31 5 coal feeding 7 6 dry coal chiller lean solvent CO2 absorber H2S, CO2 removal section gaseous CO2 O2 waste nitrogen ASU air N2 air separation section H2S absorber flash chiller stripper semi-lean solvent H2S/CO2 to Claus flash chambers 23

r dry feed Oxy-fuel IGCC Syngas from conventional gasification is burnt with high- purity oxygen in a semi-closed CO 2 -H 2 O Joule cycle: CO 2 to lock-hoppers. A CO 2 compressor recycles CO 2 to the oxy-combustor Larger pressure ratio to optimize cycle efficiency A CO 2 cryogenic purification system is needed to eliminate incondensable gases during compression 4 coal 2 CO2 for 1 Gasif 5 HP SC O2 from HP eco 3 Gasification island drier 6 20 to coal drying Oxygen island 11 steam turbine 12 LP eco O2 compr. filter CO2C LP eva + SH 8 CO2 island cryogenic expander 7 ASU combustor 9 waste nitrogen air compr. Power island CO2T HTT coolant HP eco/boiler 19 LPT SH/RH IPT 18 13 10 HPT 17 m.d. 16 15 14 knockout liquid CO2

Oxy-fuel IGCC: present vs. advanced technology 6 The gas turbine must be re-designed, using known methodologies and present technology. Large development costs can be anticipated. Present technology: Conventional gasification with H 2 S separation by Selexol Advanced technology with CO 2 -SO 2 co-sequestration: High pressure gasifier Hot Gas Filtration (550 C) H 2 S not separated (sent to burner) Improved gas turbine, due to the mid-long term application Blade coolant cooling to improve TIT

Hot Gas Desulfurization 7 To avoid Co-sequestration of CO 2 and SO 2 Reactions ZnO + H 2 S ZnS + H 2 O ZnS + 3/2 O 2 ZnO + SO 2 Desulpurization @550 C Regeneration @750 C Regeneration gas with 2% O 2 to avoid ZnSO 4 formation 18 Filter 16 Lost sorbent Fresh sorbent 13 Raw syngas 11 H2S free syngas Desulfurizer 28 Regenerator 27 Filter N2 from ASU Air 14 15 Turbo-charger 17 Regeneration off-gas

Calculation method and assumptions 8 Performance calculated by GS code, developed at Energy Dept, Politecnico di Milano Used since two decades to calculate the performance of any type of power plant Built-in in correlations for components efficiency prediction GT blade cooling models Assumptions from literature and industrial experience Gasification and ASU Gasification pressure, bar Gasification temperature, C Heat losses, % LHV Carbon conversion Temperature of O 2 to gasifier, C Moderator steam, kg H2O /kg coal N 2 to lock hoppers, kg/kg dry-coal Quenched syngas temperature, C Cold recycle syngas temperature, C Min. T in syngas coolers, C Oxygen purity, % mol. ASU electric consumption, kwh/t O2 44 1550 0.7 99.0 15 0.06 0.22 900 200 20 95 325 Gas turbine and steam cycle Fuel temperature, C GT turbine inlet temperature, C GT pressure ratio Pressure levels, bar SH/RH temperature, C Pinch point/sub-cooling T, C Condensing pressure, bar Minimum stack temperature, C CO 2 compression Number of inter-cooled stages Inter-cooling temperature, C Inter-coolers pressure loss, % Compressors isentropic efficiency, % Table 1 Assumptions for the reference IGCC plants, present technology. Water Gas Shift Reactors Selexol Plant Steam to carbon at first reactor inlet 1.5 L/G ratio (wt. basis) in H 2 S/CO 2 HT reactor outlet temperature, C 400 absorption columns LT reactor outlet temperature, C 210 CO 2 flash tanks pressures, bar Reboiler heat duty, MW th Table 2 Additional assumptions for the IGCC plant with pre-combustion capture. CO 2 to gasifier lock hoppers, kg/kg coal GT pressure ratio 0.35 40 Fuel side pressure loss at combustor, % O 2 content at combustor outlet, % mol. Table 3 Varied assumptions for the oxy-fuel IGCC plant, present technology. Gasification temperature, C Gasification pressure,bar Carbon conversion Temperature of O 2 to gasifier, C 1427 50 99.5 200 Syngas temperature to GT, C Steam pressures HP/RH, bar LP evaporation pressure, bar SH/RH steam temperature, C Table 4 Varied assumptions for the oxy-fuel IGCC plant, advanced technology. 250 1335 17 130/36 565 10/5 0.04 115 5 25 1 82 1.1/11.6 15/8/3.5/1.5 27 20 2 550 247/58 4 600/600 ZnO to TiO 2 mol.ratio in fresh sorbent System pressure, MPa Desulphurization temperature, C Sorbent loss, % in wt. 1 5 550 0.1 O 2 mol.fraction in regeneration mixture Regeneration temperature, C ZnS to ZnO mol.ratio in regen.sorbent Pressure loss at the hot gas filter, % Table5 Assumptions for Hot Gas Desulfurization. 2% 750 0.1 3

Results of the performance analysis 9 Case Reference IGCC 1335 - Precombustion IGCC 1335 no Oxy- IGCC Advanced oxy-igcc Advanced oxy-igcc + HGD 1400 no TIT, C Sulfur co-sequestration 1335 no 1400 yes Electric/mechanical power MW Gas turbine (2 units) 659.4 597.7 609.6 656.5 653.2 GT auxiliaries -2.34-2.12-2.16-2.30-2.32 Steam Turbine 420.6 354.0 454.7 510.8 513.6 Steam cycle pumps -6.53-6.92-6.51-11.60-11.01 ASU -72.15-72.17-178.17-188.2-187.0 Lock hoppers N 2 compress. -9.11-9.11 - - - Syngas recycle fan -2.4-2.41-2.42 - - Syngas compressor - - -10.79 - - N 2 compressor for fuel dilution -69.13-51.34 - - - Aux. for H 2 S / CO 2 removal -0.69-26.16-0.69 - -3.40 CO 2 compression - -40.80-83.05-83.30-83.30 Auxiliaries for heat rejection -5.86-5.18-8.88-11.03-11.03 Miscellaneous BOP -7.40-7.38-7.40-7.47-7.45 Net power output, MW el 904.4 728.2 764.2 863.5 861.3 Fuel input LHV, MW th 1897.6 1897.6 1897.6 1897.6 1897.6 Cold Gas Efficiency, % 78.14 69.63 77.36 83.85 83.31 Net LHV efficiency, % 47.66 38.38 40.27 45.50 45.39 CO 2 captured, % 0 90.76 97.38 97.38 97.38 CO 2 spec.emissions, g/kwh 732.1 82.3 25.1 22.2 22.3 Table 6 Performance of the plants considered in the paper.

Conclusions Very interesting performance can be predicted for Oxy-fuel IGCC: Environmental: NOx and SOx not wasted to the atmosphere, but mostly solved within the stream to sequestration Environmental: 95-99% 99% carbon capture, depending on the solutions adopted for incondensable gases stream Efficiency: better than 45% by adopting advanced solutions, specific to oxy-fuel configurations (not applicable to decarbonization): Hot Gas Filtration Co-sequestration of CO2-SO2 or Hot Gas Desulfurization Drawbacks: the gas turbine must be re-designed, using known methodologies and present technology. A larger attention may be devoted to Oxy-fuel IGCC in the R&D programs

Oxy-fuel CO 2 capture: present technology 11 waste nitrogen air separation section O2 ASU aria drier CO2 island cryogenic expander 18 8 gasification island 6 coal 22 lock hopper to HP SH 7 20 liquid CO2 19 9 slag 10 21 16 12 ECO EVA dry solids removal 26 from IP COS hydr. 1 17 power island 2 3 15 4 23 24 28 from HP 25 to coal drier HRSG 5 11 13 14 AGR scrubber to deaerator 27 to MDEA and sour water strippers