Outline. Control Fundamentals Control Opportunities

Similar documents
CE 370. Wastewater Characteristics. Quality. Wastewater Quality. The degree of treatment depends on: Impurities come from:

SPECIFICATION NO.1197S Addendum No.4 Attachment D. Appendix L- Ground Water Quality Data and Revised Construction Groundwater Discharge Plan

Appendix C1: Batch Kinetics Tests

State of Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Protection Laboratory Scope of Accreditation

State of Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Protection Laboratory Scope of Accreditation

DR 1900 PORTABLE SPECTROPHOTOMETER

ANALYTES available for testing

Influent preheating (note that the heat will be recovered before discharge);

Abu Dhabi Trade Effluent Standards & Regulations Summary

2019 Microbac Laboratories Inc. Ohio Valley Division

CALIFORNIA STATE ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAM Accredited Fields of Testing

French Creek Well # 2 Water Analysis Behind 1221 Ormonde Road

Final Report WP-225. WatR Pollution Study. Open Date: 10/18/13. Close Date: 12/02/13. Report Issued Date: 12/04/13

EPA Primary. (mg/l as CaCO3) (mg/l as CaCO3)

Environmental Management System

Water Quality Protection Issues for New Water Supply Wells

In the fall of 2008, Barr and PolyMet identified four sources of historical Colby Lake water quality data. Those sources are listed below:

Thermo Scientific Orion AquaMate Master Methods List - Thermo Scientific Orion AQUAfast Reagent Chemistries

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

Lecture 1: Introduction

General Information on Nitrogen

ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY APPROVAL PROGRAM CERTIFICATION MANUAL DATE

CALA Directory of Laboratories

WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT. Bentonville Wastewater Treatment Plant Facts:

WASTEWATER 101 Fo r MOWA

Final Report DMR-QA 36. NPDES Permit: IL DMR-QA Study. Open Date: 03/18/16. Close Date: 07/01/16. Report Issued Date: 07/29/16

RESOLUTION NO. RS Modification of Water and Sewer Rates Department of Water Quality (FY 2018) RECITALS

As a reminder, continued participation in the Ecology Lab Accreditation Program requires the lab to:

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection hereby certifies Microbac - Ohio Valley Division

AL-KAWTHER INDUSTRIES LTD

Parameter monitored Standard methodology used Detection limit

TOXICS REDUCTION ACT PUBLIC ANNUAL SUMMARY REPORT

Raw Potable Well Water Analysis: Grid Water Analysis: 2009 & 2016

TOXICS REDUCTION ACT PUBLIC ANNUAL SUMMARY REPORT

A. Water sampling and analysis

Benefits of On-line Monitoring of Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus

CALA Directory of Laboratories

Appendix U. Mapping of Water Quality Concentration Contours across the Province

CALIFORNIA STATE ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAM Accredited Fields of Testing

W12A Landfill Groundwater, Leachate, Water Well, Landfill Gas and Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program

Biological Phosphorus Removal Technology. Presented by: Eugene Laschinger, P.E.

Membrane Bioreactor vs. Extended Aeration Treatment Pilot Study Effluent and Groundwater Quality Presenter Leslie Dumas

Water Monitoring - Teralba Quarry EPA Point No.4 - Adit Overflow

DROGHEDA LANDFILL SITE COLLON ROAD, MELL, DROGHEDA

Georgia Power Plant Bowen NPDES Permit No. GA Ash Pond Dewatering Plan. Revised December 2017

Appendix C Aquatic Environment - Photographs and Tables

Appendix C: Water Quality Data

Georgia Power Plant McDonough-Atkinson NPDES Permit No. GA Ash Pond Dewatering Plan. Revised May 2018

LABORATORY TURNAROUND TIMES AND CHARGES

um"ts: m1 1grams per rt1er (mg./l)

Nutrient Removal Enhancement Using Process Automation at Holly Hill

Secondary Treatment Process Control

DRINKING WATER ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Sewer Charge & Surcharge Provision Development, Implementation & Benefits

2. GUIDELINES FOR THE EVALUATION OF DRINKING-WATER QUALITY FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION WITH REGARD TO CHEMICAL, PHYSICAL AND BACTERIOLOGICAL QUALITY

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR GENERAL WTP REQUESTED DATA FOR THE WATER TREATMENT PLANT (WTP) - Application : groundwater (well pit); urban wastewater;

Biological Nutrient Removal vs. Chemical Nutrient Removal

Choices to Address Filamentous Growth

APPLICATION OF HUMATE SUSTAINABLE ALTERNATIVE FOR REMEDIATION OF WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER

Why Hach Reagents? Alphabetical Listing of Reagents

Laboratory Turnaround Times and Prices

Reasonable Potential Analysis & Impacts to Pretreatment Programs. Raj Kapur Clean Water Services

2018 Schedule of Rates Fees and Charges City of Glens Falls, NY Water & Sewer Department Water Rates: $37.28 per Non-meter rate

STATE ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY SERVICES DIVISION

Chemical Test Kits. Table of Contents Introduction Reference Table Single Parameter Test Kits Multiparameter Test Kits

ICP/ICP-MS Standards. High Purity Standards for ICP/ICP-MS

MEETING NEVADA DEP-BMRR PROFILE II PARAMETERS WITH ELECTROCOAGULATION BASED TREATMENT SOLUTIONS

Biological Nutrient Removal Operations. December 9 th, 2015 Presenter Georgine Grissop PE, BCEE

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL PLUS CHEMICAL POLISHING FOR LOW LEVEL COMPLIANCE

CALA Directory of Laboratories

Laboratory & Field Instruments: Sample Cells. Sample Cells. See Inside!

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

MICROBES IN ECOLOGY INTRODUCTION

Warm Mineral Springs Sampling by Sarasota County

Meeting SB1 Requirements and TP Removal Fundamentals

APPENDIX I. LAMPIRAN I - RKL DAN RPL KEGIATAN TERPADU PROYEK PENGEMBANGAN TANGGUH LNG i

OSCAR Process Performance Optimizer FOR BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES

FORTUNE MINERALS LIMITED 140 Fullarton Street, Suite 1902, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5P2 Tel ~ Fax

Enhanced Nitrogen Removal Using Upflow Biological Filtration

RE ENGINEERING O&M PRACTICES TO GET NITROGEN & PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITHOUT FACILITY UPGRADES

SILLIKER, Inc. Southern California Laboratory 6360 Gateway Drive, Cypress, CA Tel. 209/ Fax. 714/

As a reminder, continued participation in the Ecology Lab Accreditation Program requires the lab to:

Ground Water Quality Report. Inorganic Ground Water Quality Time Series

Ground Water Quality Report. Inorganic Ground Water Quality Time Series

Globeville Landing Outfall Surface Water. December 12, 2017 Andrew Ross, Jon Novick Denver Department of Public Health & Environment

Making Your Plant Denitrify

City of Andover, Kansas Energy Assessment-Wastewater Treatment Plant

The Unexpected Consequences of Water Conservation on Water Reuse Facilities

Triplepoint Environmental

AquaSBR. Sequencing Batch Reactor Process

RTC-N: Modelling Ammonia-Based Aeration Control in Real Time for Deeper Process Control

Nutrient Removal Processes MARK GEHRING TECHNICAL SALES MGR., BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT

Pilot Scale Trials and Financial Assessment of P-Removal Media as an Alternative to Ferric Dosing to meet P Consents at Small Works

Nitrogen cycle Important steps

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Optimizing Nutrient Removal With Instrumentation. John Rutledge Hach RSM-Wastewater in NC & SC

Pilot Study Report. Z-92 Uranium Treatment Process

Treatability Study and Reverse Osmosis Pilot Study of Industrial Wastewater at a Wood Products Mill

On-Line Nutrient Monitoring-Operator s Job Got Easier

Waste Water Treatment Plant Overview and Tour

Transcription:

October 2013

Outline Review of the Process Basics. Advances in Measurement Technology Advances in Control Technology Tighter Discharge Limits Cost Reduction (Chemical and Energy) Control Considerations Control Fundamentals Control Opportunities

Process Basics

Process Fundamentals Special Focus On Nitrification Biological removal of ammonia Denitrification Biological removal of nitrate/nitrite Biological Phosphorus Removal Chemical Phosphorus Removal Other Processes BOD Removal Disinfenction

Nitrification and Denitrification Nitrification O 2 O 2 CO 2 NH 4 + -N Nitrosomonas NO 2- -N H 2 O Nitrobacter NO 3- -N H 2 O = - 4.6 lb O 2 /lb NH 3 + -N HCO 3 - HCO 3 - Denitrification NO 3- -N Facultative Bacteria N 2 -N = + 2.9 lb O 2 /lb NO 3 + -N BOD 5

Plug Flow Nitrification Trend

Advances in Measurement Technology Online Analyzers Lower Capital Cost More Reliable with Less Maintenance Lower Consumable Costs Better Accuracy

Parameters *Limited Range and Application Available Parameters Parameters ASA Pub # Parameter C h e m Sc a n MODERNWATER 41 Ammonia, Free 163 Ammonia, Total Antimony 158 Aquatic Humic Substances (AHS) Arsenic 136 Barium Cadmium 162 Chloramine 49 Chlorine, Free 121 Chlorinie, Total 133 Chrome VI Cobalt 39 COD 52 Color, Aparent 125 Color, True 66 Copper 159 Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) Gold 85 Hardness, Total 160 Humic Matter 166 Iodine 141 Iron, Ferric 43 Iron, Ferrous 129 Iron, Total Lead 134 Manganese Mercury, Dissolved 123 Molybdate 122 Monochloramine 68 Natural Organic Matter (NOM) Nickel 56 Nitrate 57 Nitrite 130 Nitrogen, Total 124 Nitrogen, Total Oxidized Nutrients, Multiple Organic Acids 157 Ozone, Dissolved Palladium 42 Percent Transmittance 40 Phosphate, ortho 132 Phosphate, poly 131 Phosphorous, Total 149 Polymers, Synthetic 69 Potassium Permanaganate Selenium 144 Silica Silver 167 Solids Correlation 127 Specific Absorbance 128 Spectrum Matching 135 Sulfate 168 Sulfite, Dechlorination 161 Tannin Tellurium Thallium Tin 126 TOC Toxicity, Specific Metals 120 Triazole 67 Turbidity* Zinc *Limited Range and Application

Highlighted In Stream Technologies Ammonia Nitrate Ortho Phosphate Oxidation Reduction Potential (ORP)

History of Control Technology Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC) Developed for GM in the 1970s. Meant as Relay Replacement Units (Digital) Originally Analog was expensive and cumbersome. HMI Software Follow the Development of PLC by about 10 years. Quickly caught up with current technology. Distributed Control Systems (DCS) was cost prohibitive except in the largest facilities.

Advances in Control Technology PLC Hardware Analog Modules are less expensive. Analog Modules have enough resolution to handle Process Control Applications Processor have the memory and speed to handle Process Control. PLC Software Data Structure to Support Process Control Application. Additional Languages to support Process Control. PLC Manufactures are determined to serve this market

Tighter Discharge Limits EPA and DNR Continue to Dictate Tighter Limits on Phosphorus. The DNR estimates up to 163 municipal plants may need new filtration systems that could run a total of $300 million to $1.13 billion. Very little point in belaboring this issue.

Cost Reduction It is oblivious if there was a magic money tree it is gone. Energy savings has always made sense when cost effective. Lowering Chemical Costs makes sense. Lowering Chemical Usage minimizes the chemical byproduct effects on waterways

Control Fundamentals To Control a Parameter it Must be Measured. To Control a Parameter there must be a Controllable Device. (VFD, Valve, Gate Position, etc) More Information is always better then less. Math and Algorithm Capabilities in PLCs are unlimited. (Add, Sub, Mult, Divide, Square Root, All Trig Function, Log, Ln and Compute) Setpoint T 8 VALVE HWR HWS

Algorithm Example

Control Opportunities

Overview of Process Control Systems Field Instrumentation Control Devices (usually PLCs) Human Machine Interface (Hardware and Software) Process Historians Reporting Systems

A Process Control System

Data, Information, Knowledge and Control Data Your daily log sheets Information Charting or Trending the log sheets Knowledge Seeing patterns that answers the How questions Control Implementing Systems to Control what we now have Knowledge of.

Key Nitrification Ammonia Removal NH3 Denitrification Nitrate Removal NO3 BPR Biological P Removal PBPR CPR Chemical P Removal PCPR

Plug Flow Process with Nitrification NH3 TIT V1 Ammonia Nitrate DO AIT AIT AIT AIT DO V2 DO is controlled to set point by the Valve V1 Ammonia can be controlled by changing DO setpoint in a feed forward manner or if Temperature is low by changing set point of the wasting rate to a lower value via Valve V2

Simple BPR Process AIT ORP M4 M5 M1 M2 M3 DO AIT AIT DO M6 DO controlled by changing the speed of Aerator Motor M1,2,3 ORP controlled by changing the speed of Aerator M4,5,6 ORP could be affected by the return rate.

BPR Process AIT ORP2 ORP1 AIT PBPR NO3 NH3 AIT NO3 ORP1 can be controlled by changing the speed of Recycle Pump 1 ORP2 can be controlled by changing the speed of Recycle Pump 2 Nitrate can be controlled by changing Recycle Pump 2 Rate with the nitrate being the master variable in this zone.

The Phosphorus Calculation By measuring the mg/l of Phosphorus and the Total Influent Flow to the Plant, the Total Phosphorus entering the plant can be determined: Total P (lb/day) = Phosphorus mg/l * Plant Flow MGD * 8.34 Calculate the pounds of Fe required by the equation (based on 1:1 molar ratio): Fe Req d (lb/day) = Total P (lb/day) *1 mole P/31 lbs P* 1 mole Fe/1 mole P *55.85 lb P/1 mole Fe

The Final Calculation Include Nullification Ratio of Fe to Phosphorus 1.6 Moles Fe/1 Mole Phosphorus (Typical range 1.6 2 in an activated sludge plant) Fe Req d (adjusted) (lb/day) = 1.6 * Fe Req d (lb/day) Final Calculation to Determine FeCL3 Flow Rate: FECL3 Flow Rate (gpd) = Fe Req d (adjusted) (lb/day) *162 lb FeCl3/55.85 lb Fe * 1 lb solution/ 35% solution * 1 gallon / (8.34 * SG) FeCl3 Solution per hour = Flow Rate (gpd)/24

The Cost Savings Flow Pace Only vs. Phosphorus Calculation Plant under normal conditions 12 MGD and 7 mg/l P Flow rate in a Rain Event goes to 30 MGD at 2.8 mg/l. Gallons of Solution goes to 158 gallons per hour but should be only 67 gallons per hour. Cost per hour lost is $113. Night time flows go to 6 MGD and Phosphorus goes to 5 mg/l. Flow rate of Solution goes to 31 gallons per hour but should go to 23 gallons per hour. Cost per hour lost is $10.

Questions?