Biodiversity and Global Change

Similar documents
Climate Action Network. Non-Paper: Input to IPCC SR 1.5 Scoping Meeting. August, Background

Belmont Forum Collaborative Research Action on Mountains as Sentinels of Change

Parks Australia Climate Change Strategic Overview

Global Climate Change

DECISION. FORTY-SIXTH SESSION OF THE IPCC Montreal, Canada, 6 10 September 2017

Section 6.2 Notes. Renewable and Non-Renewable Resources

USGCRP/CCSP Strategic Planning Building Block Global Carbon Cycle 1

Informal meeting of Environment Ministers Luxembourg 22 July Introductory remarks by Inger Andersen Director General IUCN

Fairfield Public Schools Science Curriculum Draft Units Science of the Earth s Waters

LCC Council Charter. Introduction

CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION STRATEGY

Brief Contents III. PART Processes that Generate Pattern in Marine Communities 9. PART Community Types 201. PART Conservation 401

Priority research needs of the Ministry of Climate and Environment ( )

Ch. 11 Biodiversity. Central Case: Saving the Siberian tiger

Climate Change and Nature Adapting for the Future

INTERIOR S PLAN FOR A COORDINATED, SCIENCE-BASED RESPONSE TO CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON OUR LAND, WATER, and WILDLIFE RESOURCES

3E Nexus Initiative for Sustainable Development in Asia

Ecosystem accounting at the European Environment Agency: a summary of progress 1

IUCN Policy on Biodiversity Offsets

National Biodiversity Strategy

Oregon Academic Content Standards Science Grade: 9 - Adopted: From Molecules to Organisms: Structures and Processes

Environmental Evidence for the Future Initiative. Summary Report of Call for Evidence 2018

5.1. Global Change and Global Institutions. Recommended Literature

MODULE 3 COASTAL AREA MANAGEMENT AND THE NEED FOR AN INTEGRATED APPROACH

Background information on Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services and Human Well-being

Revised mapping of the CITES Strategic Vision: objectives and the Aichi Targets in the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity

Allegheny-Clarion Valley School District

A perspective from Canada

GCOS perspective on observation requirements

Benefits and Costs of the Biodiversity Targets for the Post-2015 Development Agenda

Section 4 Environmental Impact Assessment Framework

Crosswalk of Georgia Performance Standards & Georgia Standards of Excellence GSE Implementation in Environmental Science

Charter: Great Lakes Region Aquatic Habitat Connectivity Collaborative

Concluding remarks on how Arctic Marine Protected Area (MPA) networks may reduce negative effects of climate change and ocean acidification

The U.S. tradition of conserving fish, wildlife, habitats,

Terrestrial Carbon Cycle Management Project (TCCM-P)

FORTY-SIXTH SESSION OF THE IPCC Montreal, Canada, 6 10 September 2017

MARINE SYSTEMS Lecture Dan Cogalniceanu Course content Overview of marine systems

Human Impacts Classwork. 2. What are the two ways we can measure how humans have changed the Earth?

HIGH-END CLIMATE CHANGE IN EUROPE

Oceans and Marine Resources in a Changing Climate. Technical Input Report to the 2013 National Climate Assessment

Wolfgang Cramer Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d'ecologie (IMBE) Aix-en-Provence, France

AnaEE Platform Criteria

The Climate Threat & Conservation

IUCN Standard on the Protection of Natural Habitats

Chapter 6 Review. 3. A resource that cannot be replenished by natural processes is called a. common. b. renewable. c. nonrenewable. d. conserved.

Exploration of water management adaptation strategies in the context of climatic changes in the Alps using a modelling tool

The Gold Standard A/R Smallholder & Microscale Guidelines

Water Research and Innovation in France

Delaware Standards and Instruction Science Grade: 9 - Adopted: 2014

Basic Policy for Nature Restoration

Illinois Learning Standards Science Grade: 9 - Adopted: From Molecules to Organisms: Structures and Processes

Ecological Integrity Monitoring Program

"Soil as a Sustainable Resource for the Bioeconomy BonaRes"

KILLARNEY DECLARATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH

EU request on criteria for CITES non-detriment finding for European eel (Anguilla anguilla)

Ambatovy Project: From Impact Assessment to Offsetting. Pierre O. Berner

Synergies between National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs) and REDD+

Agro-ecology for tropical and Mediterranean farming systems. An essential transition for tropical and Mediterranean farming systems

New Jersey Student Learning Standards Science Grade: 9 - Adopted: STRAND HS-LS1. From Molecules to Organisms: Structures and Processes

Government of Ethiopia Ministry of Agriculture REDD+ Secretariat Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Government of Ethiopia Ministry of Agriculture REDD+ Secretariat Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Asian Greenhouse Gases Budgets

GLOBAL WARMING CONCERNS

L 337/36 Official Journal of the European Union

RESEARCH PRIORITIES FOR 2016

HUMAN IMPACT on the BIOSPHERE Chapter 6-3 BIODIVERSITY

Key conservation policies and their targets

DEVELOPING AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS FOR CANADA GENERAL PROPOSAL

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Permanent grasslands in Europe

Section Objectives: Explain biodiversity and its importance. Relate various threats to the loss of biodiversity.

Setting National Biodiversity Targets, making use of the CBD s Framework for the 2010 Biodiversity Target

Philippe BOISNEAU*, PhD., Nicolas MICHELET*, Nicolas STOLZENBERG*, Didier MOREAU, Marc-Adrien MARCELLIER

I. Scope, geographic area, rationale, utility and assumptions

Principles of Forest Stewardship 1

Preserving Biodiversity

MESSAGE OF THE V TH IUCN WORLD PARKS CONGRESS TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

The Science of Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning: Social Science and Legal Expertise Integration

ANNEX 1. QUESTIONNAIRE about the socio-economic implications of the placing on the market of GMOs for cultivation

Coastal studies in Long Term Ecological Research. Dan Reed Santa Barbara Coastal LTER

Climate change adaptation in Europe EEA Impact Assessment, EU White Paper Comparison EU National Adaptation Strategies

Coastal Ecosystems Response to Climate Change and Human Impact in the Asia-Pacific Region (CERCCHI Project)

CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA

CONNECTIONS WITH THE NEXT GENERATION SCIENCE STANDARDS ANIMALS AND HABITATS

Think Tank Award Webinar Climate change impacts on terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystems

Lecture 1 Integrated water resources management and wetlands

Projections of Climate Change and Some Implications for Ocean Ecosystems

Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES): An analytical framework for mapping and assessment of ecosystem condition

FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON THE PROTECTION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CARPATHIANS

Socio-economic aspects in the assessment of GMOs

Estuary Habitat Restoration STRATEGY 2012

Operational Policy Statement

Theme General projections Trend Category Data confidence Climatology Air temperature

(1) Wetland Conservation (Adaptation Project) (2) Wetland Conservation (BAU Development with Adaptation Options)

Hideki Kanamaru Environment, Climate Change and Bioenergy Division, FAO 13 February 2008

Please fill in the form in the grey spaces, by following the instructions in italic.

RECALLING the adoption of Resolution Biodiversity offsets and related compensatory approaches (Jeju, 2012);

Impacts of Climate Change on Ecosystems

Complete Version from October

Transcription:

French Institute for Biodiversity Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable Development Call for Research Proposals Biodiversity and Global Change The Ministry in charge of the environment instituted the Climate Change Management and Impacts umbrella programme (GICC) in 1998. The programme s overall aim is to assess the risks arising from climate change (in particular in France and in Europe) and the possibilities for preventing or managing them. As scientific understanding and research issues evolved, it became necessary to place climate change within the context of global change, one which includes all of the major shifts triggered either by anthropogenic activity or by natural factors. The French Institute for Biodiversity (IFB), in partnership with the Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable Development, put together an initial call for research proposals focusing on interactions between biodiversity dynamics and global change. The research proposals will be assessed by the IFB s Scientific Commission, which will oversee the project s scientific aspects, in conjunction with the GICC Programme. Scientific Background Global change encompasses all of the major changes triggered, whether by anthropogenic activity or by natural factors. There is no longer any doubt that climate change, and in particular, the increase in average temperature at the Earth s surface, is a reality. Even though controversy still exists with regard to its origin, many factors argue in favour of climate change s being correlated with an increase in temperature, itself resulting from human activity (increase in greenhouse gas production). The Earth s average temperature has increased over the past century with a marked rise over the past twenty years. There is every reason to believe that, due to the inertia of major climate systems at the scale of the globe, these changes will increase during the 21 st century, with global warming on the order of 1.4 C to 5.8 C, a rise in sea level of around 50 cm, and heightening of the hydrological cycle. During the same period, atmospheric CO 2 concentration will probably have doubled. However, global change is not limited to the climate and air composition alone. Significant shifts are expected or have already been observed, due to changes in the use of terrestrial and aquatic environments. These changes in use are of two types: - intensification in use due to growing anthropic pressure (development, deforestation, clearing, intensification of farming, overuse, various forms of pollution, increase in international trade, introduction of species, GMOs, etc.); - phasing-out of other uses (release of farmland, reforestation, etc.).

While global change is already perceptible and can only magnify, its consequences on the dynamics of biodiversity remain to be quantified to a much more detailed extent, whether in terms of species distribution, adaptation of individuals or populations, co-adaptation of biological systems (predation, parasitism, symbiosis, etc.) or genotype evolution and evolution on human societies. More broadly speaking, a study of the consequences of global change will focus preferably on the structure and dynamics of landscapes, the species distribution areas, extinction rates, phenology of main biological events structuring the annual cycle, the structure and dynamics of populations and interactions between species (competition, invasions, trophic networks, parasitism and symbioses, etc.). These changes will be modulated by the spatial structure at the level of various habitats and ecosystems, itself affected (fragmentation, etc.) by global changes. In studying and modelling current global change, it is essential that time be approached from these different perspectives. To measure the speed and duration of change, and understand and analyse their effects and consequences on living organisms, the time span, temporality of events and time steps of all observations must be taken into consideration. Lastly, the changes in biodiversity caused by global change could retroact on services provided by the ecosystems, such as carbon storage in soils and forests, water purification, the usage or amenity value of the environments, etc. The interactions between global change and biodiversity must therefore be looked at from both ends, in order to understand and, if possible, predict changes to come. Considering how complex the concept of biodiversity is, no comprehensive account of it can be delivered. Understanding all of the species present in a single location and assessing how the said location contributes to diversity at broader scales (from the regional to the global) is almost impossible. Analysis of biodiversity must be based on indicators: number of species or presence of a small number of well-known taxonomic groups representative of an operating mode, infra-specific variability, diversity and permanence of components in a landscape, etc. Several different questions are to be taken into account: - how to measure changes in biodiversity, at what spatial and temporal scales, and according to what metrics? - can the extinctions and eliminations consecutive to past crises teach us something and help us better detail scenarios for changes to come? - how can we test hypotheses and biodiversity development scenarios under the influence of global change? - what processes need to be studied toward this end and according to what experimental approaches? - how does modelling contribute? how can socio-economic parameters be incorporated into models on interactions between global change and biodiversity? - how are societal decisions made with respect to global change? What are the consequences on changes in use? - lastly, what consequences will changes in biodiversity caused by global change have on the services provided by the ecosystems?

This call for proposals focuses on four issues, from describing the patterns in play to understanding the mechanisms, establishing forecasts and, lastly, making decisions. I DESCRIBING PATTERNS How can studying the dynamics of biodiversity at different scales of time, space and organisation help us suggest scenarios for change in biodiversity? If we are to grasp the extent of the current crisis in biodiversity and the issues it raises, we need to draw upon a historic and prehistoric look at current biodiversity: - the global changes that have been going on for a century or less can be associated with changes in distribution, or even extinction in species. It is sometimes possible to document them and specify their causes (climate change or change in land use). They can also be tied to changes in the traits of species life history. - the changes due to the impact of anthropisation over the course of the last 100 000 years also shed light on the incipient stages of the current crisis. - the more long-standing systems, without direct current equivalents and having worked in different contexts, also make it possible to understand how other biodiversities have been subject to, and where applicable, overcome the crises of the past. Though it is difficult to achieve fully-reliable documentation, it is clear that this information gathering and management effort is particularly important in the future assessment of the effects of global changes. II UNDERSTANDING THE MECHANISMS How can one test the consequences of global change diversity interactions? The scenarios proposed must lead to the testing of hypotheses, drawing if possible, upon archives, experimental data and functional models. Archives from the past can be used to test hypotheses on adaptability in crisis situations. For instance, when studying older situations, use can be made of conservation biology approaches and questionings and, with regard to habitat fragmentation, one can consider the barriers, spatial scales of variation and speed of species migration, latitudinal gradients, etc. For example, during a climate fluctuation documented over a sufficiently-lengthy period, what are the migratory gradients and changes in fauna and flora at the scale of an ocean or continent? Regarding the current environment, experiments need to lead to functional understanding of the influence of global change on biodiversity. Priority needs to be given to identifying groups of species that might have the same type of response to changes in their environment and share common traits (functional groups). This approach could apply to all taxonomic groups and all ecosystems: soil, sediment, forests, pelagic environments, etc. Analysis, at the scale of the landscape, the structuring or disrupting effects of habitats is, there too, an important factor in understanding and how the systems work. Diachronic or comparative analysis of the relationship between biodiversity and transformation in landscapes provides a means of analysing almost-experimental situations at an appropriate scale.

In order to experimentally test interactions between global change and biodiversity, effort will be made to: - work from hypotheses and predictions derived from modelling; - develop consistent (and, if possible, contrasting) scenarios for change, taking into account two distinct aspects, namely the climate/atmosphere and land use (or aquatic environments); - adjust model systems (if possible, contrasting biodiversity) in accordance with the scenarios; - study the main mechanisms likely to couple global change with biodiversity at the spatial and temporal scales under consideration; - study the main biological adaptations in play in the system studied; - assess the consequences of interactions between global change and biodiversity on the services provided by the ecosystems under consideration. III ESTABLISHING FORECASTS Determining Approaches The interactions between global change and biodiversity are so diverse that we are still very far from a reliable prediction system. For we must deal with the whole set of uncertainties regarding: i) scenarios (on the climate, environment use, etc.); ii) adaptations in the biological systems under study; iii) the sensitivity of biodiversity and its components (specific and functional diversity, etc.) to the said changes. The aim of the modelling processes used must be to reduce uncertainties, by striving to improve the methodologies selected and take advantage of the progress achieved in complementary areas. Coupling between climate and/or socioeconomic models with the dynamics of biodiversity is appreciable. - the use of regionalised climate scenarios that match up with the climate transition over the course of this century for different greenhouse gas emissions scenarios should be encouraged; - land and aquatic environment use scenarios will also need to be regionalised in order to be adapted to the modelling of continental or marine ecosystems; - Approaches to modelling functional biodiversity need to be articulated in order to move from global scales (such as the DGVM, Dynamic Global Vegetation Model) to more limited spatial scales, better suited to clearly-defined ecosystems. The models used must lend themselves to parameterisation and assessment, on the basis of archival or experimental data. IV MAKING DECISIONS IN THE FACE OF GLOBAL CHANGE The issue of how global change and biodiversity relate is rooted in large part in perception: perceptions of the pace, intensity and nature of change, which directly influences decisionmaking and changes in use. There is no single perception across the world and its different human groups, or one representation of global change, but many. Is the change experienced as a crisis? What is the perception threshold that makes an individual, group or society shift from the concept of change to the concept of crisis?

Likewise, biodiversity is not experienced by all as a global public good or a part of human heritage (and thereby, as belonging to a species that takes ownership of all others). The significant changes in how resources are used and mined, and the ability to adapt to those changes will all act as constraints on public policy. Social demand is important but often contradictory. Different questions emerge: how does the decision-making process develop, as governed by different conflicts, and by players respective power, including economic, and ability to adapt to the said global changes? How are the various European Directives, such as Habitat 2000 or the international agreements, implemented? How will the conflicts in resource use, such as marine halieutic resources, be overcome, in a global change setting? Will the international systems push parties to take into account the effects of global change? What is the role of scientific expertise? What action can be taken to protect biodiversity at a time when transformation of the environment has become the norm? How effective can reserve or protection zone systems be? Can and should action be taken to transport and re-establish habitats or species in areas that will become more climatically favourable? Are the corridor systems provided for in certain European projects a feasible solution? Recommendations Projects shall cover at least two of the issues set out above, and take an interdisciplinary approach. Responses shall substantiate the choice of tools and models made. The databases resulting from the selected projects shall be made available to the scientific community at the end of the programme. The junction between the projects and other national-level (OREs, workshop zones, ECLIPSE, ACI, etc.), European and international initiatives in this area shall be pointed out and explicitly stated.

How to Submit a Research Proposal Project Title Five key words Name and Surname of Proposing Party Laboratory address Telephone number Fax number Secretariat telephone E-mail address Laboratory Director stamp and signature Partners Names Laboratories Telephone numbers Fax numbers E-mail addresses Total budget for proposal Amount sought for a 24-month period Other sources of funding Half-page project abstract 5 to 10 publications from participants in relation to the topic Project overview The project overview shall not exceed 15 pages (it shall be based on explicit research issues and situate the project with respect to the state of the art, at the national, European and international levels. Deadline and mailing address Research proposals are to be sent by 15 April 2003 at the latest, in electronic format, to the IFB website: http://www.gis-ifb.org, under section "Calls for Tender still open: Biodiversity and Global Change" and by postal mail, in 5 copies, to: Institut français de la biodiversité 57 rue Cuvier 75231 PARIS CEDEX 05 Contact: martine.atramentowicz@gis-ifb.org