Chilled Ammonia Technology for CO 2 Capture. October, 2006

Similar documents
Chilled Ammonia Process Update. Richard Rhudy, EPRI Sean Black, ALSTOM CO 2 Capture Network May 24, 2007 Lyon, France

Chilled Ammonia - Pilot Testing at the We Energies Pleasant Prairie Power Plant

Clean Coal Technology

Field Testing and Independent Review of Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture Technology

Reducing CO 2 Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants

Evaluating the Cost of Emerging Technologies

Integrated CO 2 capture study for a coal fired station. Philippe Delage (ALSTOM) & Paul Broutin (IFP)

Advanced Coal Technology 101

Post Combustion CO 2 Capture Scale Up Study

Sandhya Eswaran, Song Wu, Robert Nicolo Hitachi Power Systems America, Ltd. 645 Martinsville Road, Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

Breakthroughs in clean coal technologies

CO 2 Capture and Storage for Coal-Based Power Generation

Ronald L. Schoff Parsons Corporation George Booras Electric Power Research Institute

Toshibaʼs Activities in Carbon Capture

Status and Outlook for CO 2 Capture Systems

Future of Coal in America Update on CO 2 Capture & Storage Project at AEP s Mountaineer Plant

Performance Improvements for Oxy-Coal Combustion Technology

Impact of novel PCC solvents on existing and new Australian coal-fired power plants 1 st PCC Conference, Abu-Dhabi

EPRI Advanced Coal with CCS Industry Technology Demonstration Projects

Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF CO 2 CAPTURE AND STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES IN FOSSIL FUEL POWER PLANTS

Advanced Coal Power Plant Water Usage

CO 2 Capture and Storage AEP s Perspective

Focus on Gasification in the Western U.S.

Technologies for CO 2 Capture From Electric Power Plants

Thermodynamic performance of IGCC with oxycombustion

Overview of Techniques and Approaches to CO 2 Capture

The way forward for CCS in Poland

KM-CDR Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture with KS-1 Advanced Solvent

Gasification Combined Cycles 101. Dr. Jeff Phillips EPRI

Carbon (CO 2 ) Capture

Hadong and Boryeong 10 MW Pilot Projects

Optimization of an Existing Coal-fired Power Plant with CO 2 Capture

Commercialization of Clean Coal Technology with CO2 Recovery

Problematica e Tecnologie per la cattura di CO 2 Stefano Consonni Dipartimento di Energetica - Politecnico di Milano

CO 2 Capture. John Davison IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme.

CONTROL STRTEGIES FOR FLEXIBLE OPERATION OF POWER PLANT INTEGRATED WITH CO2 CAPTURE PLANT

Econamine FG Plus SM Technology for Post- Combustion CO 2 Capture

CO 2. Capture: Comparison of Cost & Performance of Gasification and Combustion-based Plants

Air Separation Unit for Oxy-Coal Combustion Systems

Integration of carbon capture unit with power generation: technology advances in oxy-combustion plants

Canadian Clean Power Coalition: Clean Coal Technologies & Future Projects Presented to. David Butler Executive Director

Southern Company/MHI Ltd. 500 TPD CCS Demonstration. Jerrad Thomas Research Engineer Southern Company Services, Inc.

EVALUATION OF INNOVATIVE FOSSIL CYCLES INCORPORATING CO 2 REMOVAL

Heat Integration of an Oxy-Combustion Process for Coal- Fired Power Plants with CO 2 Capture by Pinch Analysis

Modelling and Simulation of a Coal-fired Supercritical Power Plant Integrated to a CO 2 Capture Plant

Integration and Onsite System Aspects of Industrial Post-Combustion CCS

Fluor s Econamine FG Plus SM Technology

GE Energy. IGCC vs. Carbon

Gasification & Water Nexus

Purification of Oxyfuel Derived CO 2 for Sequestration or EOR

CCS at IFP. from MEA to New Processes for CO 2 Post-Combustion Capture

EPRI-EPA-DOE-A&WMA Power Plant Air Pollutant Control MEGA Symposium

Comparison of a New Warm-Gas Desulfurization Process versus Traditional Scrubbers for a Commercial IGCC Power Plant

The Cost of CO 2 Capture and Storage

Progress on CO 2 Capture Pilot Plant at RIST

Processes to Recover and Purify

Gas Turbine based Power Plants with CO2 Capture

Scott Hume. Electric Power Research Institute, 1300 West WT Harris Blvd, Charlotte NC 28262

Oxy-Coal for Electric Power Generation: Status and Prospects

sco 2 Cycle as an Efficiency Improvement Opportunity for Air-Fired Coal Combustion

THE ASSESSMENT OF A WATER-CYCLE FOR CAPTURE OF CO2

Simultaneous Removal of SO 2 and CO 2 From Flue Gases at Large Coal-Fired Stationary Sources

Clean Coal Technology Roadmap CURC/EPRI/DOE Consensus Roadmap

POST COMBUSTION CO 2 CAPTURE SCALE UP STUDY

CCES Colorado Clean Energy Solutions

Modelling of CO 2 capture using Aspen Plus for EDF power plant, Krakow, Poland

The Outlook for Lower-Cost Carbon Capture and Storage for Climate Change Mitigation

CHEMICAL LOOPING COMBUSTION REFERENCE PLANT DESIGNS AND SENSITIVITY STUDIES

Total Fossil Generation Mix CO 2 Forecast

OPTIMISATION OF COAL FIRED POWER PLANT PERFORMANCE WHEN USING FLUE GAS SCRUBBERS FOR CO 2 CAPTURE

Advanced Coal Technologies for Power Generation

Available online at Energy Procedia 4 (2011) Energy Procedia 00 (2010)

Water-Energy Management Research and Development

Techno-Economic Analysis of a 550 MW e Atmospheric Iron-Based Coal-Direct Chemical Looping Process

Power Plant Water Usage and Loss

Office of Fossil Energy Overview of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Technology Effort

Industrial Waste Heat Recovery

By Gary T. Rochelle Department of Chemical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin. July 7, 2014

PRECOMBUSTION TECHNOLOGY for Coal Fired Power Plant

CO 2 capture using lime as sorbent in a carbonation/calcination cycle

2014 Gasification Technologies Conference Washington, DC Oct UOP LLC. All rights reserved.

Cryogenic Carbon Capture

Pre-Combustion Technology for Coal-fired Power Plants

Recent Developments of Hitachi s Advanced Solvent Technology for Post-combustion CO 2 Capture

Perspective on Coal Utilization Technology

PROGRESS REPORT. Pleasant Prairie Carbon Capture Demonstration Project Oct. 8, PLEASANT PRAIRIE, Wisconsin.

Available online at Energy Procedia 1 (2009) (2008) GHGT-9

Cansolv Technologies Inc. Alberta NOx and SOx Control Technologies Symposium April 9, Rick Birnbaum

Development of Integrated Flexi-Burn Dual Oxidant CFB Power Plant

ENVIRONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF CCS TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION IN THE CEMENT PROCESS CHAIN

Performance and Costs of CO 2 Capture at Gas Fired Power Plants

Carbon Reduction Options in Power Generation

Available online at Energy Procedia 1 (2009) (2008) GHGT-9. Sandra Heimel a *, Cliff Lowe a

Development and Validation of a Process. Capture CO 2

Siemens Carbon Capture Technology

McIlvaine Hot Topics

Oxycombustion for carbon capture on coal power plants: advantages, innovative solutions and key projects

Performance Evaluation of a Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycle Coal Gasification Plant

CO2 Capture with Foster Wheeler s Flexi-burn TM CFB Technology

Transcription:

Chilled Ammonia Technology for CO 2 Capture October, 2006

CO 2 Mitigation Options for Coal Based Power Increase efficiency Maximize MWs per lb of carbon processed Fuel switch with biomass Partial replacement of fossil fuels = proportional reduction in CO 2 Then, and only then.capture remaining CO 2 for EOR/Sequestration = Logical path to lowest cost of carbon reduction MIT Sequestration Form Oct 2006 Clean Coal Solutions 2

CO 2 Capture Approaches Post Capture Adsorption Absorption Hydrate based Cryogenics / Refrigeration based Oxy-fuel Firing External oxygen supply Integrated membrane-based Oxygen carriers (chemical looping) Decarbonization Reforming (fuel decarbonization) Carbonate reactions (combustion decarbonization) Innovative options continue to emerge and develop MIT Sequestration Form Oct 2006 Clean Coal Solutions 3

Low Carbon Combustion Alternate Paths to CO2 Capture Technology CO 2 Scrubbing options ammonia based Advanced Amine Scrubbing CO 2 Frosting CO 2 Wheel CO 2 Adsorption with Solids Status Demonstration in 2006. Advantage of lower costs than Amines. Applicable for retrofit & new applications Further Improvements in Solvents, Thermal Integration, and Application of Membranes Technologies Focused on Reducing Cost and Power Usage Multiple suppliers driving innovations Uses Refrigeration Principle to Capture CO 2 from Flue Gas. Process Being Developed by Ecole de Mines de Paris, France, with ALSTOM Support Use Regenerative Air-Heater-Like Device with Solid Absorbent Material to Capture ~ 60% CO 2 from Flue Gas. Being Developed by Toshiba, with Support from ALSTOM Being Developed by the University of Oslo & SINTEF Materials & Chemistry (Oslo, Norway), in Cooperation with ALSTOM MIT Sequestration Form Oct 2006 Clean Coal Solutions 4

CO2 Capture Innovations Chilled Ammonia System Ammonia reacts with CO 2 and water and forms ammonia carbonate or bicarbonate Absorption at low temperature prevents ammonia release 2NH 3 + CO 2 + H 2 O (NH 4 )2CO 3 Existing SO 2 Scrubber Flue Gas Energy Energy Recovery Recovery Existing Stack Concentrated CO 2 to Sequestration NH 3 + CO 2 + H2O NH 4 HCO 3 (NH 4 )2CO 3 + CO 2 + H 2 O 2NH 4 HCO 3 Moderately raising the temperature reverses the above reactions producing CO 2 Regeneration at high pressure and low concentrations of ammonia prevent gaseous ammonia release Flue Gas Cooling System Flue Gas Cooling CO 2 Absorption Tower CO 2 Tower CO 2 Lean CO 2 Rich Energy Recovery Fluid Regeneration MIT Sequestration Form Oct 2006 Clean Coal Solutions 5

Ammonia Process Innovations Cooling the flue gas to 0-10 o C (32-50 F) Condensing H 2 O and eliminating residual contamination Reducing flue gas volume and increasing CO 2 concentration Operating the absorber at 0-10 o C for high CO 2 capture efficiency with low NH 3 emission Regeneration at >120 o C (250 F) and >20 (300 psi) bar to generate high pressure CO 2 stream with low moisture and low ammonia concentration MIT Sequestration Form Oct 2006 Clean Coal Solutions 6

Advantages of Ammonia High efficiency capture of CO 2 Low heat of reaction High capacity for CO 2 per unit of solution Easy and low temperature regeneration Low cost reagent No degradation during absorption-regeneration Tolerance to oxygen and contaminations in gas MIT Sequestration Form Oct 2006 Clean Coal Solutions 7

Basic Comparison with MEA MEA NH3 Molecular weight 61 17 Practical CO2 loading, Kg/Kg solution 0.05 0.1-0.2 Heat of reaction, Kcal/gmole 20-22 6-8 Absorption temperature, C 40-70 0-10 Regeneration temperature, C 110-130 (230-266F) 110-130 Regeneration pressure, bara 1-1.5 (14.5-22psi) 20-40 (300-600 psi) H2O/CO2 in regenerator gas outlet (mole ratio) 1-1.5 0.01-0.05 Makeup requirements, kg/ton CO2 2 0.2 Makeup cost, $/ton 1000-1500 200-300 MIT Sequestration Form Oct 2006 Clean Coal Solutions 8

Basic Comparison with MEA Supercritical PC Without CO 2 Removal SCPC With MEA CO 2 Removal Parsons Study SCPC With NH 3 CO 2 Removal Current Study Coal Feed rate, lb/hr 333,542 333,542 333,542 Coal heating value, Btu/lb (HHV) 11,666 11,666 11,666 Boiler heat input, MMBtu 3,891 3,891 3,891 LP Steam extraction, lb/hr for reboiler 0 1,215,641 179,500 Steam Turbine Power, kwe 498,319 408,089 484,995 Generator loss, kwe (7,211) (5,835) (7,018) Gross plant, kwe 491,108 402,254 471,301 Plant Auxiliary Load (IDF, FGD, BFW pumps, Water pumps, Cooling Towers, CO2 unit, Chillers, CO2 compressor, BOP), kwe (29,050) (72,730) (53,950) Net Power Output 462,058 329,524 421,717 Net efficiency, % HHV 40.5 28.9 37.0 Avoided Cost, $/ton CO2 Base 51.1 19.7 MIT Sequestration Form Oct 2006 Clean Coal Solutions 9

We Energies Pleasant Prairie Host Site Location for 5MW Pilot MIT Sequestration Form Oct 2006 Clean Coal Solutions 10

Proposed Pilot Location MIT Sequestration Form Oct 2006 Clean Coal Solutions 11

Host Site Location MIT Sequestration Form Oct 2006 Clean Coal Solutions 12

Illustration of the Pilot MIT Sequestration Form Oct 2006 Clean Coal Solutions 13

Roles of Project Team Members Task Title EPRI ALSTOM WE Energies 1. Pilot Plant Design and Construction 1.01 Site Permitting S X 1.02 Define base design data, X 1.03 Mass balance calculation, P&ID X 1.04 Prel equipment sizing & GA X 1.1 Preliminary Design & Calculation, Phase I X 1.2 Detailed Design, Phase II X 1.3 Procurement X 1.4 Fabrication X 1.5 Process Safety review S X 1.6 Construction X 1.7 Commissioning & Start-up X S 2. Operation & Maintenance 2.1 Consumable Supply X 2.2 Waste Disposal X 2.3 Operation Labor X S 2.4 Maintenance Labor S X 3. Testing 3.1 Test Plan X S S 3.2 Baseline Tests X S S 3.3 Parametric Tests X S S 3.4 Long-Term Tests X S S 3.5 Data Analysis X S S 4. Performance and Economic Evaluation X S S 5. Management and Reporting 5.1 Project Management, PM & PE S X S 5.2 Reporting S X S 5.3 Accounting/Invoicing S X S 6. Pilot Plant Decommissioning X X - Lead Party S - Support CO2 PILOT - 5MW Roles of Project Team Members MIT Sequestration Form Oct 2006 Clean Coal Solutions 14

Levelized COE cents/kwhr 10 8 6 4 2 0 Multiple Paths to CO2 Reduction Innovations for the Future No CO 2 Capture SCPC IGCC SCPC w/mea Oxyfiring w CO2 SCPC adv amines IGCC F turbine Note: Costs include compression, but do not include sequestration equal for all technologies Hatched Range reflects cost variation from fuels and uncertainty ----------------------With CO 2 Capture------------------------ SCPC NH3 USCPC adv CO2 IGCC H turbine w adv CO2 Technology Choices Reduce Risk and Lower Costs MIT Sequestration Form Oct 2006 Clean Coal Solutions 15

COMPLETE COMBUSTION AIR BLOWN IGCC Our Vision for New Coal Power Portfolio of Clean Technologies Near-zero emissions O 2 Oxygen Fired CFB or PC CO 2 Carbon Free Power COAL Air PC CFB USC PC USC CFB Postcombustion capture CHEMICAL LOOPING CO 2 CO2 2 CO2 Capture And Sequestration PARTIAL COMBUSTION Air O 2 IGCC IGCC AIR BLOWN IGCC CO2 Scrubbing water shift CO2 2 PETROCHEMICAL Fuel Cell MIT Sequestration Form Oct 2006 Clean Coal Solutions 16 H 2 H 2 GT 3

www.alstom.com