Performance Evaluation of a Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycle Coal Gasification Plant

Similar documents
Scott Hume. Electric Power Research Institute, 1300 West WT Harris Blvd, Charlotte NC 28262

Advanced Coal Power Plant Water Usage

Flexible Integration of the sco 2 Allam Cycle with Coal Gasification for Low-Cost, Emission-Free Electricity Generation

BLUE OPTION White space is filled with one or more photos

Thermodynamic performance of IGCC with oxycombustion

Ronald L. Schoff Parsons Corporation George Booras Electric Power Research Institute

September 10, Megan Huang* & Dr. Chandrashekhar Sonwane

UPDATE ON THE KEMPER COUNTY IGCC PROJECT Gasification Technologies Conference

Potential of Allam cycle with natural gas to reduce carbon dioxide emission in India

Gasification Combined Cycles 101. Dr. Jeff Phillips EPRI

SYNGAS-FIRED ALLAM CYCLE PROJECT UPDATE

THE ASSESSMENT OF A WATER-CYCLE FOR CAPTURE OF CO2

Improving Flexibility of IGCC for Harmonizing with Renewable Energy - Osaki CoolGen s Efforts -

Techno-Economic Assessment of Oxy-Combustion Turbine Power Plants with CO 2 Capture

Preliminary Cost and Performance Results for a Natural Gas-fired Direct sco 2 Power Plant

CALCIUM LOOPING PROCESS FOR CLEAN FOSSIL FUEL CONVERSION. Shwetha Ramkumar, Robert M. Statnick, Liang-Shih Fan. Daniel P. Connell

Fossil Energy. Fossil Energy Technologies. Chapter 12, #1. Access (clean HH fuel) Coal. Air quality (outdoor)

APPLICATION OF BGL GASIFICATION OF SOLID HYDROCARBONS FOR IGCC POWER GENERATION

NOx CONTROL FOR IGCC FACILITIES STEAM vs. NITROGEN

Coal gasification and CO 2 capture

The Future of IGCC Technology CCPC-EPRI IGCC Roadmap Results

2. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT

Design Optimisation of the Graz Cycle Prototype Plant

Thermodynamic Performance of IGCC with Oxy-Combustion CO 2 Capture

Focus on Gasification in the Western U.S.

NET Power. Truly Clean, Cheaper Energy. California Energy Commission CO 2 Capture Technology Workshop. April 16, April NET Power

sco 2 Cycle as an Efficiency Improvement Opportunity for Air-Fired Coal Combustion

Production of Electricity and/or Fuels from Biomass by Thermochemical Conversion

Power cycle development

Problematica e Tecnologie per la cattura di CO 2 Stefano Consonni Dipartimento di Energetica - Politecnico di Milano

Combined Heat and Power

MIT Carbon Sequestration Forum VII Pathways to Lower Capture Costs

WITH CO2 SEQUESTRATION

Clean Coal Technology

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 180B CARBON CAPTURE FROM COAL FIRED POWER GENERATION (DECEMBER 2008 REPUBLISHED MARCH 2009)

CO 2 Capture: Impacts on IGCC Plant Performance in a High Elevation Application using Western Sub-Bituminous Coal

WRITECoal Gasification of Low- Rank Coals for Improved Advanced Clean Coal Gasifier / IGCC Design

Benchmarking of power cycles with CO 2 capture The impact of the chosen framework

- The Osaki CoolGen Project -

Gasification & Water Nexus

Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants

GTC Conference. Advanced IGCC with Partial Carbon Capture. October Jacobs. Presented at:

Office of Fossil Energy Overview of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Technology Effort

A Further Step Towards a Graz Cycle Power Plant for CO 2 Capture

The Cost of Mercury Removal in an IGCC Plant

Available online at Energy Procedia 4 (2011) Energy Procedia 00 (2010)

Pre-Combustion Technology for Coal-fired Power Plants

Production of Electric Power and Chemicals in a Carbon Constrained Environment

EVALUATION OF INNOVATIVE FOSSIL CYCLES INCORPORATING CO 2 REMOVAL

PERFORMANCE BASELINE FOR DIRECT-FIRED sco2 CYCLES

Callide Oxyfuel Project Development and Progress

The Progress of Osaki CoolGen Project

Carbon Capture Options for LNG Liquefaction

Advanced Coal Technology 101

Process simulation activities at Politecnico di Milano on Ca-based solid looping cycles

Commercialization of Clean Coal Technology with CO2 Recovery

TRONDHEIM CCS CONFERENCE

Design Details of a 600 MW Graz Cycle Thermal Power Plant for CO 2

DEVELOPMENT OF HITACHI OXY-COMBUSTION TECHNOLOGY WITH NEW TYPES OF BURNER AND FLUE GAS RE-CIRCULATION SYSTEM

Power Generation PG CTET-Han

Ion Transport Membrane (ITM) Technology for Lower-Cost Oxygen Production

Lurgi s MPG Gasification plus Rectisol Gas Purification Advanced Process Combination for Reliable Syngas Production

Reducing CO 2 Emission by Hydrogen IGCC Power Plants. Hydrogen IGCC

Appendix 3.B Electricity Generation Primer

sco 2 Research & Development at NETL

Comparison of a New Warm-Gas Desulfurization Process versus Traditional Scrubbers for a Commercial IGCC Power Plant

Air Separation Unit for Oxy-Coal Combustion Systems

Development Of The sco 2 Allam Cycle

Integration of carbon capture unit with power generation: technology advances in oxy-combustion plants

SOME ENERGY-EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGIES IN JAPAN

Performance Improvements for Oxy-Coal Combustion Technology

The Novel Design of an IGCC System with Zero Carbon Emissions

Technology Adaptation In Power Generation

An ETI Perspective. Evaluation of the NET Power low carbon power process

Canadian Clean Power Coalition: Clean Coal-Fired Power Plant Technology To Address Climate Change Concerns

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 114 (2017 )

Analysis of flexibility options for electricity generating projects with pre-combustion capture of CO 2

Power Plant Water Usage and Loss

Chapter 3 Coal-Based Electricity Generation

Repowering Conventional Coal Plants with Texaco Gasification: The Environmental and Economic Solution

3 rd Generation Oxy-Fuel Combustion Systems

OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE AND CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS.

COAL POWER PLANTS WITH CO 2 CAPTURE: THE IGCC OPTION

Pre-owned 240 MW Combined Cycle Gas Turbine Power Plant

Paolo Chiesa. Politecnico di Milano. Tom Kreutz*, Bob Williams. Princeton University

Challenges in Designing Fuel-Fired sco2 Heaters for Closed sco2 Brayton Cycle Power Plants

Coal based IGCC technology

Energy Procedia 4 (2011) Energy Procedia 00 (2010) GHGT-10

Gasification to meet refinery hydrogen, electricity and steam demands: Availability vs Costs

ITM Oxygen: The New Oxygen Supply for the New IGCC Market

MARAMA Webinar August 7, Angelos Kokkinos Chief Technology Officer Babcock Power, Inc.

Gas turbines have been used for electricity generation. Gas turbines are ideal for this application as they can be started and stopped quickly.

Conception of a Pulverized Coal Fired Power Plant with Carbon Capture around a Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Brayton Cycle

A Final Phase IV Report Prepared by Electric Power Research Institute, June 2014

Chemical Looping Gasification Sulfur By-Product

Steady State and Transient Modeling for the 10 MWe SCO 2 Test Facility Program

Development of Integrated Flexi-Burn Dual Oxidant CFB Power Plant

IGCC: Coal s Pathway to the Future

Supercritical Water Coal Conversion with Aquifer-Based Sequestration of CO 2

Efficient Technologies for Down Stream Gasification Process and Integration with IGCC Power Production

Transcription:

Performance Evaluation of a Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycle Coal Gasification Plant Scott Hume Principal Technical Leader The 5th International Symposium - Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycles March 28-31, 2016, San Antonio, Texas

Structure Introduction Background Base Case IGCC Base Case IGCC with Capture Brayton Power Cycle Plant Design Basis Modeling Approach Results Performance Design Considerations Conclusions 2

Introduction Supercritical CO 2 Cycles offer the potential for high net efficiency of 48.9% (HHV) [1] from coal Advanced IGCC design, novel plant components Investigation of sco 2 Brayton coupled to a conventional IGCC gasifier design IGCC Plant based on EPRI report 1015699 (2009) [2] [1] R.J. Allam et al, High efficiency and low cost of electricity generation from fossil fuels while eliminating atmospheric emissions, including carbon dioxide GHGT-11-18th-22nd November 2012, Kyoto International Conference Center, Japan [2] Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Design Considerations for Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Capture, Schoff, R EPRI Report 1015690, 2009 3

Background - Base Case IGCC Plant Shell Syngas Cooler (SGC) design Medium pressure technology (43 barg) Oxygen purity 95% v/v Pressurized dry gas feed No CO shift or CO 2 removal Selexol acid gas removal GE 7FB combustion turbine + HRSG TAIL GAS RECYCLE System Fuel Input 1470 Gas Turbine Output 464 Steam Turbine Output 235 CO2 LP Compression - HP Pumps - Fuel Compression - Oxygen Compression - IGCC Aux 16.2 ASU 74.4 Steam Cycle Aux 8.2 Cooling Water Aux 11.1 Net Power 587.9 Power Plant Efficiency (HHV) 40.0% CO2 lb/mwh 1770 WET COAL COAL MILLING & DRYING GASIFICATION ISLAND SYNGAS COOLING SYNGAS TREATMENT ACID GAS REMOVAL SULFUR RECOVERY SULFUR N2 TF NITROGEN SYNGAS AIR AIR SEPARATION UNIT OXYGEN AIR N 2 Injection GAS TURBINE POWER Moderator Steam STACK COOLING WATER STEAM TURBINE ISLAND HRSG 4 CGS British POWER

Gasification with sco 2 Brayton Power Cycle Coal gasified Resultant Syngas processed Syngas compressed to >300 bara GAS CLEANUP GASIFIER COAL AIR SEPARATION UNIT Combusted at low excess O 2 levels OXYGEN Supercritical CO 2 working fluid Expanded to produce power HIGH PRESSURE CO 2 BURNER GEN Recuperative heat exchanger Moisture condensed out CO 2 PUMP CO 2 Gas Recompressed / Pumped COOLER Semi - Closed Loop Export CO 2 available at high pressure WATER 5

Closed Brayton Cycle CO H 2 O 2 Combustion Heat ~700 C CO 2 Recovered Heat Work H 2 O ~760 C Heat Rejection 6

Plant Design Basis Conventional gasification system PRB Fuel 273 tonnes/hr feed (1470MWth HHV) NH 3, COS, H 2 S, Mercury removal Steam Cycle 565 C / 125 bara Max 700 C CO 2 feed to burner Turbine Inlet Temperature ~1150 C Max 760 C gas turbine exhaust Heat Exchanger min 20 K approach CO 2 delivered pressure ~150 bara 3 cases developed: 1 Conventional Nitrogen Transfer Fluid 2 Carbon Dioxide Transfer Fluid 3 Case 2 except with High Purity Oxygen 7

Case 1 N2TF Nitrogen transfer fluid (as before) Gasification plant Syngas production unchanged New power block ultra high pressure gas turbine Syngas cooler complete boiler unit ASU capacity increased, oxygen purity 95% v/v Moderator steam remains IGCC Output: Syngas Product Compostion CO 58.32% v/v(w) H2 27.91% v/v(w) CO2 1.56% v/v(w) N2 11.21% v/v(w) Ar 0.86% v/v(w) Others 0.15% v/v(w) Massflow 375407 kg/hr 8

Case 2 CO2TF Transfer Fluid sourced from CO 2 working fluid Nitrogen content reduced over 90% from Case 1 Gasifier process changed increased CO content No moderator steam, syngas CO 2 content higher Lower hydrogen content Oxygen purity at 95% v/v IGCC Output: Syngas Product Compostion CO 68.32% v/v(w) H2 22.58% v/v(w) CO2 6.56% v/v(w) N2 1.06% v/v(w) Ar 1.39% v/v(w) Others 0.09% v/v(w) Massflow 388165 kg/hr TAIL GAS RECYCLE WET COAL COAL MILLING & DRYING GASIFICATION ISLAND SYNGAS COOLING SYNGAS TREATMENT ACID GAS REMOVAL SULFUR RECOVERY SULFUR CO 2 TF NITROGEN CO 2 Transfer Fluid CO 2 PRODUCT TREATMENT CO 2 PRODUCT AIR AIR SEPARATION UNIT OXYGEN COMPRESSORS & PUMPS COMBUSTOR EXPANDER POWER NEW EQUIPMENT MODIFIED Moderator Steam STEAM TURBINE ISLAND COOLING WATER CONDENSER HEAT EXCHANGER CGS British POWER ACID WATER 9

Case 3 CO2TF (HPO) Similar to Case 2 except: ASU Oxygen purity increased to 99.5% v/v Nitrogen content reduced further by over 50% Argon content very low IGCC Output: Syngas Product Compostion CO 69.59% v/v(w) H2 22.71% v/v(w) CO2 6.94% v/v(w) N2 0.50% v/v(w) Ar 0.17% v/v(w) Others 0.09% v/v(w) Massflow 380393 kg/hr TAIL GAS RECYCLE WET COAL COAL MILLING & DRYING GASIFICATION ISLAND SYNGAS COOLING SYNGAS TREATMENT ACID GAS REMOVAL SULFUR RECOVERY SULFUR CO 2 TF NITROGEN CO 2 Transfer Fluid CO 2 PRODUCT TREATMENT CO 2 PRODUCT AIR AIR SEPARATION UNIT OXYGEN COMPRESSORS & PUMPS COMBUSTOR EXPANDER POWER NEW EQUIPMENT MODIFIED Moderator Steam STEAM TURBINE ISLAND COOLING WATER CONDENSER HEAT EXCHANGER CGS British POWER ACID WATER 10

Compression Analysis Pure CO 2 Dense Phase -'Liquid-like' Gas-like Incompressible: Liquid 11

Compression Analysis Case 1 CO2 N2 AR O2 H2O 80.05% v/v(w) 15.89% v/v(w) 3.30% v/v(w) 0.58% v/v(w) 0.18% v/v(w) Dense Phase -'Liquid-like' Gas-like Incompressible: Liquid 12

Compression Analysis Case 2 CO2 N2 AR O2 H2O 93.19% v/v(w) 2.23% v/v(w) 3.83% v/v(w) 0.57% v/v(w) 0.18% v/v(w) Dense Phase -'Liquid-like' Gas-like Incompressible: Liquid 13

Compression Analysis Case 3 CO2 N2 AR O2 H2O 98.06% v/v(w) 0.68% v/v(w) 0.48% v/v(w) 0.59% v/v(w) 0.18% v/v(w) Dense Phase -'Liquid-like' Gas-like Incompressible: Liquid 14

Performance Results - Product Purity 15

Performance Results - Power 70.0% Plant Efficiency (HHV) 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% IGCC 40.0% 40.5% 39.6% 39.6% CO 2 Purity ~ 80%vol CO 2 Purity ~ 93%vol ~ similar output CO 2 Purity ~ 98%vol Low purity CO 2 working fluid delivers more power but not within product specification Case 3 (HPO) meets specification and achieves near 100% capture with similar power output 0.0% IGCC (no capture) IGBC N2 TF IGBC CO2 TF IGBC HPO Net CO2 Aux Plant Aux 16

Performance Results Case IGCC w/o Capture sco2 Case 1 sco2 Case 2 sco2 Case 3 Transfer Fluid N2 N2 CO2 CO2 Oxygen Purity v% 95 95 95 99.5 Fuel Input MWth 1470 1470 1470 1470 GT/Expander Power MWe 464 922 864 846 Steam Turbine Power MWe 235 52.3 58.4 59.3 CO2 Compression MWe - 95.0 86.3 83.2 CO2 Pumps MWe - 113.6 87.2 72.4 Fuel Compression MWe - 46.6 43.4 42.7 Oxygen Supply (ASU/Comp) MWe 74.4 91.1 90.7 92.5 Gasifier Auxiliary MWe 16.2 16.2 16.2 16.2 Plant Auxiliary MWe 19.3 14.7 14.9 14.8 Net Power Exported* MWe 587.9 596.0 582.4 582.6 Overall Plant Efficiency % HHV 40.0 40.5 39.6 39.6 Capture Rate % 0 99.5 99.3 99.2 CO2 Emission lb/mwh 1770 11.6 12.9 13.6 CO2 Emission g/kwh 803 5.3 5.9 6.2 CO2 Product Flow lb/h - 1,211,335 1,092,124 1,046,597 CO2 Product Flow kg/h - 549,483 495,407 474,755 CO2 Product Purity v% wet - 80.1 93.2 98.1 with near 100% capture, performance close to IGCC without capture! 17

Technical Risks Higher Pressure Gasification Exchanger and Piping Combustor Design ultra low oxygen Expander Design Integrally cooled HP blades High temperature materials High & low temperature corrosion CO 2 Product Purity (oxygen) Ultra high pressure CO 2 Safety 18

Conclusions and Recommendations GAS CLEANUP GASIFIER Superior low carbon performance COAL AIR SEPARATION UNIT Proven gasification technology OXYGEN Near 100% capture HIGH PRESSURE CO2 BURNER GEN Opportunities to improve efficiency CO2 PUMP COOLER Future areas of investigation WATER sco 2 turbine development Combustion performance Heat exchanger cost reduction Economic cycle optimization Product gas purity improvement 19

Together Shaping the Future of Electricity 20