UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO SCARBOROUGH DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT. MGEC02: Topics in Price Theory. Instructor: A. Mazaheri Sample Test-1 (Solutions)

Similar documents
ECON 230D2-002 Mid-term 1. Student Number MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Ecn Intermediate Microeconomic Theory University of California - Davis June 11, 2009 Instructor: John Parman. Final Exam

14.01 Principles of Microeconomics, Fall 2007 Chia-Hui Chen November 7, Lecture 22

EconS 301 Intermediate Microeconomics Review Session #9 Chapter 12: Capturing Surplus

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A) Fall 2013

Final Examination Suggested Solution ECON 201

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A) Monopoly Behavior Advanced Pricing with Market Power

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A)

MONOPOLY SOLUTIONS TO TEXT PROBLEMS: Quick Quizzes

Managerial Economics Chapter 9 Practice Question

Chapter 13. Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

Chapter 13. Chapter Outline. Some Specific Oligopoly Models : Cournot, Bertrand and Stackelberg Competition When There are Increasing Returns to Scale

University of Victoria Winter Econ 203 Problem Set 3

ECON 115. Industrial Organization

Lecture 2 OLIGOPOLY Copyright 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.

Recall from last time. Econ 410: Micro Theory. Cournot Equilibrium. The plan for today. Comparing Cournot, Stackelberg, and Bertrand Equilibria

EXAMINATION 4 VERSION A "Perfect and Imperfect Competition" April 30, 2014

Advanced Microeconomic Theory. Chapter 7: Monopoly

short run long run short run consumer surplus producer surplus marginal revenue

Business Economics BUSINESS ECONOMICS. PAPER No. 1: MICROECONOMIC ANALYSIS MODULE No. 24: NON-COLLUSIVE OLIGOPOLY I

ECMC02H Intermediate Microeconomics - Topics in Price Theory

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A) Fall 2013

FINAL EXAMINATION. Special Instructions: Date: DECEMBER 15, 2000 School Year: Course and No.: ECON1006EA Time: 1:30 PM- 3:30 PM

Final Exam - Solutions

Pindyck and Rubinfeld, Chapter 13 Sections 13.1, 13.2, 13.3 and 13.6 continued

14.1 Comparison of Market Structures

Lecture 22. Oligopoly & Monopolistic Competition

Managerial Economics & Business Strategy Chapter 9. Basic Oligopoly Models

Economics 384 B1. Intermediate Microeconomics II. Assignment 2. S Landon Winter 2007

Chapter 25: Monopoly Behavior

Do not open this exam until told to do so. Solution

Textbook questions: Competitors and Competition

ECON 101: Principles of Microeconomics Discussion Section Week 12 TA: Kanit Kuevibulvanich

This paper is not to be removed from the Examination Halls

University of Pennsylvania Department of Economics

EXAMINATION #4 VERSION C General Equilibrium and Market Power November 24, 2015

INTERMEDIATE MICROECONOMICS LECTURE 13 - MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION AND OLIGOPOLY. Monopolistic Competition

Ecn Intermediate Microeconomic Theory University of California - Davis December 10, 2009 Instructor: John Parman. Final Exam

The Economics of the European Union

Principles of Economics. January 2018

Microeconomics (Oligopoly & Game, Ch 12)

Final Examination Thursday, June 16, 2016, 3:30pm 4:45pm ECON 201

University of California, Davis

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A) Fall Module II

Chapter 12. Monopoly. Chapter Outline. Key Ideas. Key Ideas. Introducing a New Market Structure. Evidence-Based Economics Example 11/25/2016

1-4. Nash Equilibrium outcome of a game theory model where all players are doing the best they can given the actions of all other players.

Boston College Problem Set 6, Fall 2012 EC Principles of Microeconomics Instructor: Inacio G L Bo

Test 3 Econ 3144 Fall 2010 Dr. Rupp 31 Multiple Choice Questions Signature I have neither given nor received aid on this exam

University of Notre Dame Department of Finance Economics of the Firm Spring 2012

Economics 335 Price Discrimination Answer Key. (a) (page 1) You have to show with the aid of graphs that the monopolist s total demand is given by

Econ Microeconomic Analysis and Policy

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A) Fall Module II

Homework 4 Economics

VERSION 1. Economics 101 Lec 3 Elizabeth Kelly Fall 2000 Midterm #3 / Version #1 December 4, Student Name: ID Number: Section Number: TA Name:

Imperfect Competition

Econ8500_Imperfect_Competition

Price discrimination by a monopolist

Practice Exam 3: S201 Walker Fall with answers to MC

EconS Pricing and Advertising - Part 2

ICMB202/203 Microeconomics. Final Practice Questions. Carefully explain whether each of the following statements is true, false or uncertain.

Producer Theory - Monopoly

ECON 115. Industrial Organization

This paper is not to be removed from the Examination Halls

Managerial Economics Prof. Trupti Mishra S.J.M School of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture -29 Monopoly (Contd )

c) Will the monopolist described in (b) earn positive, negative, or zero economic profits? Explain your answer.

Microeconomics. Claudia Vogel EUV. Winter Term 2009/2010. Market Power: Monopoly and Monopsony

EXAMINATION 4 VERSION A "Perfect and Imperfect Competition" November 28, 2016

Lecture 7 Pricing with Market Power

Monopoly. John Asker Econ 170 Industrial Organization January 22, / 1

The Analysis of Competitive Markets

Department of Economics. Harvard University. Spring Honors General Exam. April 6, 2011

In each case: fixed firms in the market, then entry/exit

UBC Commerce/FRE 295 FINAL EXAM -- December 12, 2011

Economics 101 Fall 2016 Homework #4 Due November 17, 2016

Deadweight Loss of Monopoly

Professor David Popp Solutions to Problem Set #6 Fall 2018

ECON 200. Introduction to Microeconomics

Monopoly. Cost. Average total cost. Quantity of Output

Topic 10: Price Discrimination

Finance 510 Midterm #2 Practice Questions

Market structures. Why Monopolies Arise. Why Monopolies Arise. Market power. Monopoly. Monopoly resources

Economics 323 Microeconomic Theory Fall 2016

Firm Supply. Market demand. Demand curve facing firm

Unit 13 AP Economics - Practice

Microeconomics (Fall term) Syllabus

Lesson-33. Pricing Strategy

Chapter 24: Monopoly. Watanabe Econ Monopoly 1 / 61. Watanabe Econ Monopoly 2 / 61. Watanabe Econ Monopoly 3 / 61

SECOND-DEGREE PRICE DISCRIMINATION (P-R pp )

Final Exam - Solutions

Monopoly Behavior or Price Discrimination Chapter 25

ECON 115. Industrial Organization

All but which of the following are true in the long-run for a competitive firm that maximizes profits?

Now suppose a price ceiling of 15 is set by the government.

This paper is not to be removed from the Examination Halls

Commerce 295 Midterm Answers

Monopoly. The single seller or firm referred to as a monopolist or monopolistic firm. Characteristics of a monopolistic industry

ECON 102 Brown Final Exam (New Material) Practice Exam Solutions

Why do monopolies charge different prices to different customers: price discrimination: eg mobile phone tariffs)

MICROECONOMICS 2601 FINAL % 100 Marks 2 Hours FI Concession Assessment 27 February 2017 STUDENT NUMBER IDENTITY NUMBER. Marks Examiners 1 2

Transcription:

UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO SCARBOROUGH DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT MGEC02: Topics in Price Theory Instructor: A. Mazaheri Sample Test-1 (Solutions) Instructions: This is a closed book test. You have 2 Hours. Good Luck! Last Name: First Name: ID FOR MARKERS ONLY: Marks Earned Maximum Marks Possible Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Total 25 20 15 15 15 90 Page 1 of 11

Answer all following 5 questions: Question-1 [25 Points] Answer the following Short Questions: a) [5 Points] Bookstores often offer annual memberships that allow customers to purchase books at a 10% discount. Explain why this may increase profits of the bookstore. Answer: This book club membership program is an example of a two-part tariff. If the consumer purchases a membership, they are able to purchase subsequent books at a discount to the price charged to non-members. This membership is in the best interest of the storeʹs profits if the consumers increase purchases at the store. That is, the loss in profit margin due to the discount is offset by the membership fee and the increased number of book purchases. If the consumer will not purchases any more books than without the membership and saves money by joining the club, then bookstore profits are reduced. The bookstore must believe that joining the book club will induce the consumer to purchase books more frequently at the bookstore or the membership fee will exceed the customerʹs savings. b) [5 Points] The outcome of Bertrand duopoly is efficient. True, False, Uncertain, Explain. Answer: Uncertain: The outcome of the Bertrand duopoly is efficient only if both players have similar marginal cost and if the good is not differentiated. Page 2 of 11

c) [10 Points] The market is characterized as a monopsony. Suppose the demand is P =10 Q, and the supply is given by P = Q 4. How much will the monopsonist buy? What price will it pay? What is the deadweight loss from monopsony power? Show on the clear graph the changes in producer and consumer surpluses when moving from competitive price and quantity to monopsony. MV = 10 Q AE = Q 4 TE = Q 2 4Q ME = 2Q 4 ME = MV => P = 14 / 3 4 = => 10 Q = 2Q 4 => Q = 14 / 3 2 / 3 MV = 10 14 / 3 AE = MV DWL = (5.33 => 10 Q = Q 4 => Q = 7 2 / 3) (7 14 / 3) / 2 5.44 5.33 2/3 14/3 7 10 Page 3 of 11

d) [5 Points] You own a family business. You are asked to determine the optimal monthly advertising expenditures for the business. Your total monthly cost is TC = 4Q + 0.0005Q 2 + A where A is the advertising expenditure. The firm s marginal revenue from advertising is constant at MRA = $4, and the advertising elasticity of demand is 0.4. Suppose you know the profit maximizing level of output is Q = 12,000 per month. What is the firm s optimal level of advertising expenditure? Q MRA = 4 = 1+ MC A => A = 25600 = 1+ (4 + 0.001Q ) E DA Q A 12000 = 1+ (4 + 0.001 12000)0.4 A Page 4 of 11

Question-2 (20 Points): Grey provides bus service between two rural communities. It sells tickets to both adults and children. The demand functions for the two groups are given below. Adults: Q a = 40 -.20P a Children: Q c = 100-2P c The Q s are the number of trips demanded per day by the two groups and the P s are the fares. Assume that Grey is a constant cost third-degree price discriminator with TC = 20Q, where Q is the total number of trips taken per day by the two groups together. (Note that this says that the cost of a trip for a child is the same as for an adult.) a) [6 Points] What fare does Grey charge in the adult and children sub-market and how many tickets per day does it sell there? b) [6 Points] Compute the point elasticity for the both markets child market. c) [4 Points] What conclusion about third-degree price discriminators do you draw from your answers? d) [4 Points] What profit is Grey earning? a) P a = 200-5Q a MR a = 200-10Q a MC = ΔTC/ΔQ = 20 Set MC = MR and solve for Q. (Q a = 18). Plug your Q back into the demand curve. (P a = 110) Adult Ridership 200 150 Dollars 100 50 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 Quantity P c = 50 0.5Q c MR c = 50-Q c MC = ΔTC/ΔQ = 20 Set MC = MR and solve for Q. (Q c = 30). Plug your Q back into the demand curve. (P c = 35) Page 5 of 11

Children Ridership 60 50 40 Dollars 30 20 10 0 0 50 100 150 Quantity b) E D = (110/18)(-1/5) = - 1.22 Demand is elastic. A price reduction of 1% will increase ridership by 1.22%. E D = -2.33 c) If the two demands are added up and the profit for the monopolist calculated the overall profit will definitely be less than what you get with price discrimination. Demand is more elastic in the child sub-market. The price discriminator should charge a higher price in the adult market, where demand is less elastic. d) Profit = (P a -20)Q a +(P c -20)Q c = 2070 Page 6 of 11

Question-3 (15 Points): Consider a telecommunications firm that offers both phone service and a high-speed internet service. It has two types of consumers who differ in their willingness to pay a monthly rental fee for either service: Talkers Hackers Phone Service $28 $a Internet Service $16 $22 where a > 0. There is a mass N of consumers. Half of these consumers are talkers, and the other half are hackers. The firm is not able to price discriminate. Costs are normalized to zero. a) [7.5 Points] Compute the firm's profit under separate pricing (i.e., under unbundling) as a function of a. b) [7.5 Points] Compute the firm's profit under pure bundling as a function of a. Pure bundling means that the firm is only selling the two services as a package. a) The firm maximizes profits by charging $16 for internet service, which yields $16N profit on internet sales. If a < 14, then the firm charges $28 and makes $14N on phone sales. If 14 < a < 28, the firm charges a for phone service and makes $an on phone sales. If 28 < a < 56, the firm charges $28 for phone service and makes $28N on phone sales. If a > 56, the firm charges a for phone service and makes (a/2)n on phone sales. b) There are three regions to consider: a < 22 22 < a < 66 a > 66 Price 22 + a 44 22+a Profits (22 + a)n 44N (11+a/2)N Page 7 of 11

Question-4 (15 Points): Two large diversified consumer products firms are about to enter the market for a new pain reliever. The two firms are very similar in terms of their costs, strategic approach, and market outlook. Moreover, the firms have very similar individual demand curves so that each firm expects to sell one-half of the total market output at any given price. The market demand curve for the pain reliever is given as: Q = 2600-400P. Both firms have constant long-run average costs of $2.00 per bottle. Patent protection insures that the two firms will operate as a duopoly for the foreseeable future. Price and quantity values are stated in per-bottle terms. a) (7.5 Points) If the firms act as Cournot duopolists, solve for the firm and market outputs and equilibrium prices. a) (7.5 Points) If the firms act as Stackelberg duopolists, solve for the firm and market outputs and equilibrium prices. a) Begin by solving for P. Q = 2600-400P => Q - 2600 = -400P => P = 6.5-0.0025Q Denote the two firms A and B and solve for reaction functions. TRA = PA QA => TRA = (6.5-0.0025Q)QA TRA = 6.5QA - 0.0025[(QA + QB)QA] = 6.5QA - 0.0025QA 2-0.0025QAQB MRA = 6.5-0.005QA - 0.0025QB Set MRA = MC => 6.5-0.005QA - 0.0025QB = 2-0.005QA = 4.5 + 0.0025QB QA = 900-0.5QB One can verify that: QB = 900-0.5QA Substitute expression for QB into QA QA = 900-0.5(900-0.5QA) = 900-450 + 0.25QA QA -0.25QA = QA(1-0.25) = 450 => QA = 450/0.75 = 600 Substitute expression for QA into QB QB = 900-0.5(900-0.5QB) QB= 600 QT = QA + QB QT = 600 + 600 = 1200 P = 6.5-0.0025(1200) = 3.5 Page 8 of 11

b) P = 6.5-0.0025Q TRA = PA QA => TRA = (6.5-0.0025Q)QA TRA = 6.5QA - 0.0025[(QA + QB)QA] = 6.5QA - 0.0025QA 2-0.0025QAQB Substitute for QB by the reaction function: TRA= 6.5QA - 0.0025QA 2-0.0025QA (900-0.5QA) = 4.25QA-0.00125QA 2 MRA = 4.25-0.0025QA Set MRA = MC => 4.25-0.0025QA = 2 => QA = 900 Insert QA in the reaction function for B: QB = 900-0.5QA = 450 Page 9 of 11

Question-5 (15 Points): The market for an industrial chemical has a single dominant firm and a competitive fringe comprised of many firms that behave as price takers. The dominant firm has recently begun behaving as a price leader, setting price while the competitive fringe follows. The market demand curve and competitive fringe supply curve are given below. Marginal cost for the dominant firm is $0.75 per gallon. QM = 140,000-32,000P QF = 60,000 + 8,000P, where QM = market quantity demanded, and QF = the supply of the competitive fringe. Quantities are measured in gallons per week, and price is measured as a price per gallon. a) (7.5 Points) Determine the price and output that would prevail in the market under the conditions described above. Identify output for the dominant firm as well as the competitive fringe. b) (7.5 Points) Assume that the market demand curve shifts rightward by 40,000 units. Show that the dominant firm is indeed a price leader. What output (leader and follower) and market price will prevail after the change in demand? a) QM = 140,000-32,000P QF = 60,000 + 8,000P Denote dominant firm demand curve as QD. QD = QM - QF QD = 140,000-32,000P - (60,000 + 8,000P) QD = 80,000-40,000P Solve for P: QD - 80,000 = -40,000P P = 2-0.000025QD MRD = 2-0.00005QD Marginal cost for the dominant firm is $0.75. Equate MRD to MCD 2-0.00005QD = 0.75-0.00005QD = -1.25 => QD = 25,000 P = 2-0.000025(25,000) = 2-0.625 = 1.375 per gallon Fringe takes dominant firm price as given QF = 60,000 + 8,000(1.375) = 71,000 QT = 25,000 + 71,000 = 96,000 b) A 40,000 increase in demand curve to: QM = 180,000-32,000P = 60,000 + 8,000P QD = 180,000-72,000P - (60,000 + 8000P) = 120,000-40,000P Page 10 of 11

Solve for P QD - 120,000 = -40,000P PD = 3-0.000025QD MRD = 3-0.00005QD setting MRD = MCD 3-0.00005QD = 0.75 => -0.00005QD = -2.25 => QD = 45,000 PD = 3-0.000025(45,000) = 3-1.125 = $1.875 Fringe again follows QF = 60,000 + 8,000(1.875) = 75,000 QT = 45,000 + 75,000 = 120,000 We can see that when demand changed, the dominant firm raised price. The competitive fringe took the new price as given and adjusted output accordingly. Page 11 of 11