COTTONWOOD CREEK RECLAMATION PHASE I & II

Similar documents
CHERRY CREEK BASIN PHOSPHORUS CONTROL PROJECTS

ADDENDUM #1 RFP WOLFTRAP CREEK STREAM RESTORATION

INDIAN CREEK WATERSHED PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Lower Watershed Ecosystem Services in Coastal Areas with a focus on the Courtenay River Floodplain

Memorandum BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Jason R. Vogel, Ph.D., P.E. Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering Oklahoma State University

BMP 5.4.2: Protect /Conserve/Enhance Riparian Areas

Constructed Wetland Channel T-9

Oshawa Creek Watershed Management Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW Mississippi Dr Coon Rapids, MN SQ FT Residence on 0.64 Acre Lot

CDOT-Arapahoe Road over Cherry Creek Water Quality Report

Drainage Criteria Manual Review

Bluff Creek One Water

Constructed Wetland Pond T-8

Stream and Watershed Restoration Design and Quantitative Benefits. Kelly Gutshall, RLA and Mike LaSala

Old Mill School Stream Restoration

4. Present Activities and Roles

Cherry Creek State Park - Cherry Creek Stream 12-Mile Park Phase II Cherry Creek Basin Water Quality Authority

Mill Creek Restoration in Lower Merion Township. PH (610) ; FAX (610) ;

5.15 Wetlands and Other Waters of the U.S.

Section 6: Stormwater Improvements

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DES PLAINES RIVER WATERSHED-BASED PLAN WHY A WATERSHED-BASED PLAN? WHAT IS A WATERSHED?

4. Ponds and infiltration BMPs can achieve 60 to 100% removal efficiencies for sediment.

MONTEREY PENINSULA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR SELECTIVE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT AND BANK RESTORATION (RANCHO SAN CARLOS AREA)

Hydrology 101. Impacts of the Urban Environment. Nokomis Knolls Pond Summer June 2008

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW. Spring Lake Park Schools Westwood Middle School st Avenue NE, Spring Lake Park, MN 55432

Rainfall, runoff and sediment transport in the Napa River watershed: now and a possible future

Maintaining Riparian Areas and Wetlands

Understanding and Restoring Natural Floodplain Function. Gary James CTUIR Fisheries Program Manager

ANCR INDIVIDUAL RESPONSES SUMMARY: 2/11/04 WATER RESOURCES GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Watershed Hydrology: Go with the flow. Greg Jennings, PhD, PE

California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands (CRAM) Buffer and Landscape Context Attribute

1/16/2016. California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands (CRAM) Buffer and Landscape Context Attribute. Buffer and Landscape Context Attribute

IAFSM 2010 Annual Conference. City of Rockford Keith Creek Greenway Flood Mitigation Project

SECTION IV WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Riparian Buffer Requirements. Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Watershed Management

Wood Canyon Emergent Wetland Project. City of Aliso Viejo 12 Journey, Suite 100 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656

Lake Creek Watershed Management Plan Public Meeting. Arrowhead Lake May 3, :00 PM

Site Condition Evaluation & Environmental Benefits Report

Installation of the geocell retaining walls is under way a few feet from the normal creek level.

LAKE COUNTY HYDROLOGY DESIGN STANDARDS

STREAM RESTORATION PURPOSE, PRACTICE, AND METHODS. By Marcus Rubenstein, CPESC

Stream Buffers Sharpest Tool in the SWM Toolbox Tom Hegemier, PE, D.WRE, CFM

CHAPTER 1. Ecological Integrity

Appendix B Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Requirements Checklist

Design, Construction, & Benefits of Integrated Stream & Wetland Stormwater Restoration Projects Presented By: Underwood & Associates / Biohabitats,

CITY OF AUSTIN'S REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR CREEK PROTECTION

STREAM AND BUFFER AREA PROTECTION/RESTORATION

PROJECT SCREENING MATRIX: A User s Guide

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW

How Climate Change Impacts Urban Runoff and Water Quality Design

Stormwater Management Tools: Real-Life Solutions for a Resilient Community Riparian Corridor Protection

Deep River-Portage Burns Waterway Watershed 2015

Protecting and Enhancing Ecosystem Services the Role of Wetlands and Watershed Management in Flood Attenuation Dr. Mark Gloutney Director Regional

Watershed Improvements

3 Baseline and Existing Conditions

Vegetative Buffer Regulations to Protect Water quality

Background. AEM Tier 2 Worksheet Stream & Floodplain Management. Glossary

Case Study 19. Mill Creek Embedded Box Culvert Vented Ford

STAFF REPORT FOR POLICY PLAN AMENDMENT S10-CW-1CP

The Table of Contents

Reservoir age, increasing human population,

Post-Development Stormwater Runoff Performance Standards

Primer introduction to watershed management Plan Process highlight the major steps of plan development Project types look at some examples of common

14(h)EPA-06 City of Springfield 76 East High Street Springfield, Ohio Clark County Greening City Plaza

2.4 Floodplain Restoration Principles

I. Welcome & Introductions WPAC History (Paul Racette, PEC)

Restoration of Riparian Forests and Riparian Ecosystem Processes and Implications for Salmon Restoration. Katie Ross-Smith Jennifer Hammond

Project Priority List scoring worksheet - stormwater Guidance document

Municipal Stormwater Management Plan Prepared For The Borough of Cape May Point By Van Note-Harvey Associates VNH File No.

RIVERSIDE OXBOW FORT WORTH, TEXAS CHAPTER 3 IDENTIFICATION OF PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES

RIPARIAN CORRIDOR STUDY FINAL PARLEYS CREEK MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS

Implementing Restoration Projects Upstream from the Teaneck Creek Conservancy

Appendix E : Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Areas

Chapter 3 Dispersion BMPs

A resource assessment of the Etowah Watershed

STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL

Harris County Flood Control District Site Stabilization and Revegetation

FIGURE 12-1 FUNCTIONS AND BENEFITS OF HEALTHY STREAMS

Municipal Stormwater Management Planning

719 Griswold, Suite 820 Detroit, MI DANVERS POND DAM REMOVAL AND STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT

Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Update: Base Strategy and Methodology to Address Hydromodification Impacts

Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Update: Base Strategy and Methodology to Address Hydromodification Impacts

Incorporating Restoration Planning and Transportation Controls into the Valley Creek Watershed Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan

Water Quality Technical Memorandum

Glossary of Terms. Aquifer A permeable body of rock capable of yielding quantities of groundwater to wells and springs.

Impact of Increased Stormwater Runoff on Urban Drainage Systems

11. Public Utilities. Key Terminology: OVERVIEW STORMWATER MANAGEMENT WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONS AND COMMISSIONS. Inventory and Analysis

BUREAU OF CLEAN WATER

SHORELINE INVENTORY AND RESTORATION PLANNING

HYDROLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS. 22 nd Annual Nonpoint Source Pollution Conference Saratoga Springs, NY

Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. Chapter 3. Stormwater Management Principles and Recommended Control Guidelines

Griswold Creek Subwatershed

Water Quality Ecosystem Services in the Urban Environment

TABLE OF CONTENTS. TOC-i

Southeast Policy Area Drainage Study

RIPARIAN AREAS REGULATION

Presentation Overview

Wetland Resources Cultural, Historical and Environmental Significance

S.R. 4007, Section 14B PADEP Environmental Assessment Form. Enclosure C Description of Aquatic Habitat

Transcription:

COTTONWOOD CREEK RECLAMATION PHASE I & II

COTTONWOOD CREEK RECLAMATION Stream Stabilization Approach to Urban Runoff Quality Cherry Creek Basin Water Quality Authority The Problem The Cherry Creek Reservoir Clean Lakes Study (DRCOG 1984) identified that Reservoir water quality and its uses were moderately impaired and that phosphorus was the limiting nutrient. To protect the water quality of Cherry Creek, the Water quality Control Commission (WQCC) set an in-lake, seasonal chlorophyll a standard of 15- g/l and set a phosphorus goal of 40- g/l (2000, 2001). The Cherry Creek Control Regulation (2004), requires the implementation of best management practices (BMP) for all new development and pollutant reduction facilities throughout the watershed (PRF). PRF are typically larger scale BMP constructed by the Authority that reduce phosphorus loads to the Reservoir. Urbanization of the Cottonwood Creek watershed (8.5 square miles) greatly increased during 1980 s and continues today. Urbanization increases the rate, frequency, duration and magnitude of storm runoff, all of which increases erosion of the streambed and banks. This erosion is evident in the adjacent photo, which shows that the Creek had degraded up to 10-feet within Cherry Creek State Park. These soils, along with other associated pollutants, particularly phosphorus, are being carried into the Reservoir, degrading its quality. Soils were also being carried into the Park from upstream development and ending up in the Reservoir. Flood History Cottonwood Creek through Cherry Creek State Park has a history of flood events that have severely eroded the channel bed and banks and confined it to a narrow section beginning at Peoria Street (see photo above). Flooding has been reported in the past at the intersection of Peoria Street and Belleview Avenue, and within the shooting range, most recently in August 2004. Previous farming activities have apparently relocated the lower portion of the channel up on a ridge through the shooting center, rather than in the valley, which has altered the flood plain. Stream Stabilization One Solution The Cottonwood Creek Stream Reclamation project extends from Peoria Street to the Perimeter Road within Cherry Creek State Park. This reach constitutes phase III and IV of the four phase improvements for Lower Cottonwood Creek. Phase I was the perimeter road wetlands constructed in 1996 and Phase II was the Peoria Street extended detention basin, completed in 2003. Phase III stream reclamation-peoria Street to the confluence with Lone Tree Creek-was completed in 2004. Phase IV-confluence to the Perimeter Road-is scheduled to begin construction in 2006. The primary purpose of stream stabilization (Phase III and IV) is to reduce erosion of the streambed and stream banks. Phase III and IV will also enhance growth of wetland and riparian vegetation, will attract wildlife, and will provide passive recreation opportunities, all of which are important objectives in the design approach. The proposed design concept will go beyond simply stabilizing the Creek in place. Improvements will re-create, as closely as possible, a natural, well-vegetated, functional stream system that establishes close ties between its baseflow channel and its broad, flat floodplain overbanks (see picture at left). CotnwdCreekFlyer-v2.doc, 9/16/2005

Water Quality Benefits Cottonwood Creek will be reclaimed as a meandering, shallow prairie stream that will overtop with fairly frequent storm events, allowing over-banks and secondary channels to dissipate flood flows, thereby reducing velocities and erosive forces. Hydrologic conditions will be conducive to the regeneration of cottonwoods, willows, and other natural riparian species along the channel. This additional vegetation will further help to slow down flood flows, reinforce channel banks, enhance water quality, and provide other environmental benefits. In an attempt to quantify the phosphorus reduction benefits, the Authority has estimated the reduction in phosphorus from stream stabilization and the additional floodplain area and wetlands. 1. Stream Bank Stabilization. The improved stream will increase the length from 11,600 linear feet, with a sinuosity of 1.37 to 14,260 feet, with a sinuosity of 1.74. Authority estimates for stream stabilization (both banks for Cottonwood Creek only) is approximately 210 pounds of phosphorus per mile for 2.19 miles, per year or around 460 lbs. 2. Flood Plain Area. Existing 2-year floodplain width is 5.3 acres, which will increase to over 80 acres. This will increase the riparian corridor area from 4.4- to 24.9 acres and provide for greater infiltration and filtration by vegetation. Estimates were made of long term phosphorus removal by inundating the floodplain for various flood frequencies, based on dynamic, particle-settling theory. These estimates resulted in a long-term average 1.0 lbs/p per acre/year of floodplain, or around 70 pounds per year. 3. Riparian Wetlands. The existing channel has less than 0.5 acres of riparian wetlands, which are primarily associated with limited channel bottom. The project will widen the channel and increase the frequency of riparian flooding. These improvements are expected to increase riparian wetland areas by 20-acres and immobilize from 200-lbs annually (i.e.: about 10-lbs/ac/yr). 4. Annual Phosphorus Reduction Total of all components is 460 + 70 + 200 = 730 pounds P. Cottonwood Creek Reclamation Phase 1 was completed in early August 2004 with the first flood occurring on August 18, 2004. Based on water-marks at Peoria Street, the peak flow entering the newly constructed channel was estimated to be 1400 cfs, which compares to the projected 100-year event of 4,000cfs. The photo below shows the restored creek during the flood event. The success of the project is attributed to the "low-energy" design. This approach flattens the channel slope decreasing velocity (kinetic energy) and allows the flood to spread over larger areas, increasing flow area and decreasing velocity. Additional Information Information about the Cherry Creek Basin Water Quality Authority can be obtained from our recently created website at www.cherrycreekbasin.org CotnwdCreekFlyer-v2.doc, 9/16/2005