EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Brussels, C(2010)7122. State aid N391/2010 Germany Broadband development in Hessen. Dear Sir,

Similar documents
1) I am pleased to inform you that the Commission has decided to approve the above aid scheme until 31 December 2013.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State aid N 368/2009 Germany Amendment of the State aid broadband scheme N 115/ Rural areas in Germany

State aid SA /N FI Fixed operating aid for power plants using renewable energy sources

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State Aid SA (2016/N) Austria Aid to fast broadband infrastructure in rural areas in Niederösterreich

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. The Right Hon Jack STRAW MP Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Downing Street London SW1A 2AL United Kingdom

Subject: State aid N 47/2008 Austria Modification of feed-in tariffs for electricity from renewable sources under the Austrian Green Electricity Act

ABERTIS TELECOM COMMENTS ON THE REVISION OF THE COMMUNITY GUIDELINES FOR THE APPLICATION OF STATE AID RULES IN RELATION TO RAPID DEPLOYMENT OF

Case No COMP/M.6191 Birla/ Columbian Chemicals

8459/17 CB/ek 1 DGE 2B

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Brussels, C(2013)9306 final

CIS Photovoltaic re-cladding project, Manchester

Promotion of renewables in Spain/Coruna

REVISION OF THE BROADBAND GUIDELINES CONTRIBUTION FROM ALT LAW FIRM

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Brussels, C(2016) 3208 final

Case SI/2009/0957: Wholesale (physical) network infrastructure access (including shared or fully unbundled access) at a fixed location

Case No M MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES / SIEMENS / METAL TECHNOLOGIES JV

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State aid No N 327/ United Kingdom (Northern Ireland) Northern Ireland Beef Quality Initiative

Embargo VISTA illimité(*)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Dear Mr Homann

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Brussels, C(2017) 1589 final

Case M PGA / MSA. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32015M7747

BEREC Opinion on. Phase II investigation. pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case DE/2014/1642

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Brussels, C(2009)2237

Council of the European Union Brussels, 22 May 2017 (OR. en)

Official Journal of the European Union L 344/65 RECOMMENDATIONS COMMISSION

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Dear Mr Homann,

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State aid SA (2016/N) Italy - Strategia Banda Ultralarga

CEMR Response to the Consultation on the new texts regarding the application of State aid rules to Services of General Economic Interest

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 26 November 2013 (OR. en) 16162/13 Interinstitutional File: 2013/0213 (COD)

Embargo VISTA illimité(*)

Bridging the Digital Divide

COMP/M TRITON III HOLDING 6/ WITTUR GROUP

Embargo VISTA illimité(*)

Needs of the Region Europe: Farmers. Avanti Communications February 2014

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Indirect Taxation and Tax Administration Value Added Tax VEG N O 067

Official Journal of the European Union L 347/303

Case No COMP/M SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC/ INVENSYS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/11/2013

Case No COMP/M MEXICHEM/ VESTOLIT

Case No COMP/M JOHN WOOD GROUP/ SIEMENS/ JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/04/2014

Commission internal. Brussels, C(2010)888

6515/18 AM/am 1 DG E 1A

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

Case No COMP/M BOEING / LOCKHEED MARTIN / UNITED LAUNCH ALLIANCE JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Decision to lift reservations pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC 1

Energy and Environmental State aid Guidelines Frequently asked questions

Below-Threshold Contracts

Case No COMP/M SHELL / BEB. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 20/11/2003

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32017M8640

Case No COMP/M CANON/ IRIS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 22(3) Date:

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State aid SA (2017/N) Sweden Tax reductions for pure and high-blended liquid biofuels

Case No COMP/M CORPORATION / AZLAN GROUP. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/03/2003

Embargo VISTA illimité(*)

Case AT/2009/0970: Wholesale broadband access in Austria. Opening of Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7(4) of Directive 2002/21/EC 1

Apl. Prof. Dr Dr Joachim Sanden Head of Directorate for Soil Protection and Contaminated Sites, Ministry of Urban Development and Environment

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Brussels, SG (...) D/ Subject: N 112/04 SE, Tax exemption for biofuels

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 27 February 2014 (OR. en) 2012/0190 (COD) PE-CONS 120/13 ENV 1159 ENT 332 CODEC 2811

Telecoms: how the Article 7 consultation and notification mechanism works: frequently asked questions (see also IP/10/644)

COMMISSION DECISION. of 8 December concerning national provisions notified by Denmark on certain industrial greenhouse gases

DG COMPETITION Unit F3 01 April 2014

NOTIFICATION OF DRAFT MEASURES PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 7(3) OF DIRECTIVE 2002/21/EC For the markets for

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities DG

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Case RO/2015/1805: Wholesale central access provided at a fixed location for mass-market products in Romania

Undue discrimination by SMP providers How Ofcom will investigate potential contraventions on competition grounds of Requirements not to unduly

BEREC Opinion. Phase II investigation. pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case FI/2012/ :

RECOMMENDATIONS. (Text with EEA relevance) (2014/710/EU)

The SGEI Communication

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of

DGE 2 EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 21 March 2018 (OR. en) 2016/0149 (COD) PE-CONS 69/17

DG COMP, Unit C4 dealing with State Aid in the Information, Communication and Media sectors European Commission 1049 Brussels BELGIUM

Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 February 2019 (OR. en)

Council of the European Union Brussels, 19 February 2015 (OR. en)

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Basic Principles of European State Aid Law

Official Journal of the European Union L 314/9 DECISIONS COUNCIL

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of (Text with EEA relevance)

EBA/RTS/2017/ December Final Report. Draft regulatory technical standards. on central contact points under Directive (EU) 2015/2366 (PSD2)

1. SUMMARY 1) I am pleased to inform you that the Commission has decided to approve the above measure.

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

8. But so far the principle of local and regional self-government has not been properly respected in the EU framework. The problem is not confined to

15489/14 TA/il 1 DG E 2 A

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State aid SA (2011/N) Austria Third Prolongation of the ERP Transport Programme

Community Guidelines for the application of State aid rules in relation to rapid deployment of broadband networks

Case No M PONTMEYER / DBS

STANDARD NOTIFICATION FORM. Notification of Draft Measures According to Article 7 of Directive 2002/21EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Comments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC

REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Amended proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Message 791 Communication from the Commission - SG(2012) D/50777 Directive 98/34/EC Notification: 2011/0188/D

Comments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC 1

NOTE FOR THK ATTE)~ITIO!V OF MR LUIS ROMERO RKQUKIIIA, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF LEI AL SERVICE

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Case M LINAMAR / MONTUPET. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 10/12/2015

CRITERIA FOR THE COMPATIBILITY ANALYSIS OF TRAINING STATE AID CASES SUBJECT TO INDIVIDUAL NOTIFICATION

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Consultation Response Public

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction A shared responsibility of Public Authority in the Union An essential component of the European mode

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Commission Decision concerning Case DK/2014/1665: Review of the LRAIC model on the fixed markets in Denmark for the year 2015

Transcription:

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 12.10.2010 C(2010)7122 PUBLIC VERSION WORKING LANGUAGE This document is made available for information purposes only. Subject: Dear Sir, State aid N391/2010 Germany Broadband development in Hessen 1. PROCEDURE AND DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURE (1) On 9 September 2010, the Federal Republic of Germany notified to the Commission the above-mentioned aid measure. The measure was notified under the Notice on simplified procedure, in particular point 5(b)(v) of the Notice. 1 (2) A description of the relevant features of this measure can be found in the summary of the notification, as published on the website of the Commission http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/register/ii/doc/not_n391_2010_a L_DE.pdf and annexed to the present decision. 2. ASSESSMENT OF THE MEASURE 2.1. Existence of aid (3) Under the current scheme, the German authorities will provide direct grants for electronic communication operators to extend adequate broadband coverage in the region of Hessen. As shown by the features of the measure 1 OJ C136, 16.06.2009, p. 3-12. His Excellency Dr. Guido WESTERWELLE Federal Minister for Foreign Affairs Werderscher Markt 1 D - 10117 BERLIN Commission européenne, B-1049 Bruxelles Belgique Europese Commissie, B-1049 Brussel België Telephone: 00-32 (0) 2 299 11.11.

described in the summary of the notification, the current measure will be financed by state resources. It will provide selective economic advantage to the electronic communication operators selected via the tender procedure and also for third party electronic communication operators that will be able to offer their services via wholesale access to the subsidized networks. There will be also an advantage for the business in the targeted areas. (4) The measure has the potential to distort competition. At the level of the network operators, support given to one operator may discourage other operators to deploy or expand their own networks in the targeted area on commercial terms. Public funding could also encourage local undertakings to subscribe to the services offered via the subsidized networks instead of more expensive market-based solutions. Insofar as the intervention is liable to affect providers of electronic communications services from other Member States and distorts competition between end users located in Germany and elsewhere in Europe, the measure has an effect on trade. The markets for electronic communication services are open to competition between operators and service providers, which generally engage in activities that are subject to trade between Member States. (5) The Commission therefore concludes that the notified aid measure constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU 2 as moreover confirmed by the notifying Member State during the notification. 2.2. Compatibility of the aid (6) The Commission's compatibility assessment of the notified measure in this case did not imply any serious difficulties. The German authorities designed the current measure fully in accordance with two existing federal broadband support schemes in Germany, which were endorsed under the EU State aid rules by the Commission decisions of N238/2008 3 and N368/2009 4 : the current measure only differs in the target areas from the above referred existing broadband schemes. (7) The Commission has assessed the compatibility of the notified measure with the internal market in the light of the Broadband Guidelines 5, which contain a detailed interpretation of Article 107(3)(c) of the TFEU in this area of State aid law. As regards the applicable substantive provisions, the Commission has essentially analysed the measures in the light of the criteria developed in 2 3 4 5 With effect from 1 December 2009, Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty have become Articles 107 and 108, respectively, of the TFEU. The two sets of provisions are, in substance, identical. For the purposes of this Decision, references to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU should be understood as references to Articles 87 and 88, respectively, of the EC Treaty where appropriate. Commission decision in case N238/2008 "Broadband infrastructure development in Germany". JOCE C/154/2009. Commission decision in case N368/2009 "Bund: Änderung der Breitbandbeihilferegelung N115/2008 Breitbandversorgung ländlicher Räume in Deutschland". JOCE C/93/2010. Community Guidelines for the application of State aid rules in relation to rapid deployment of broadband networks, OJ C 235, 30.9.2009, p.7.

paragraphs 31 to 51 of the Broadband Guidelines. In order to be compatible under Article 107(3)(c) of the TFEU, the aid must pursue an objective of common interest in a necessary and proportionate way. (8) Since the objective of the measure is to extend basic broadband services to areas where no adequate broadband services with minimum 1 Mbps download speeds are available: the measure at stake pursues well defined EU policy objectives as laid down in paragraphs 37 to 40 of the Broadband Guidelines. The objective of the measure is also in line with the Digital Agenda 6 which calls Member States to use public financing in line with EU competition and State aid rules in order to meet the coverage, speed and takeup targets defined in Europe 2020 7. (9) The Commission's analysis confirms that the measure is well designed to deliver those common interest objectives. (10) First, it is an appropriate instrument because in the targeted areas of Hessen, Germany, the provision of adequate broadband services remains unprofitable for commercial operators in the near future of three years - that will be proved by a detailed mapping and coverage analysis and verified by an open, transparent public consultation for each aid project granted under the notified scheme. Hence the measure targets only "white areas" within the meaning of paragraphs 41 and 42 of the Broadband Guidelines and there are no valid alternatives to public funding to overcome those obstacles. (11) Second, since the measure only targets "white areas", the broadband network investment concerned would not take place in the near future of three years without any State aid. The maximum aid amount per single project will be EUR 500.000 that can be granted under the current scheme 8. As confirmed by the German authorities, any project that might require public funding of more than EUR 500.000 would be subject to an individual State aid notification. The Commission considers that the aid should provide a direct and appropriate investment incentive for the selected operator due to the use of an open tender process to select the beneficiaries. (12) Third, the measure at stake is considered proportionate because, amongst other features, the following can be identified: a) A detailed mapping and coverage analysis verified by an open, transparent public consultation will be conducted by the granting authorities in order to clearly indentify the targeted "white areas". In particular, the granting authorities will (1) undertake a detailed analysis of the existing infrastructures of the targeted areas; (2) in case the existing broadband 6 7 8 A Digital Agenda for Europe. COM/2010/0245 f/2. The Europe 2020 Strategy has underlined the importance of broadband deployment to promote social inclusion and competitiveness in the EU. It restated the objective to bring basic broadband to all Europeans by 2013 and seeks to ensure that, by 2020, (i) all Europeans have access to much higher internet speeds of above 30 Mbps and (ii) 50% or more of European households subscribe to internet connections above 100 Mbps. Support under this scheme cannot be cumulated with any other German State aid broadband measures.

services deemed not adequate and there is a well-defined need of consumers for better broadband services, the granting authorities will be allowed to use State aid to remedy the market situation 9. (3) If an operator raises concern on the plans of the granting authorities (because for instance, it considers that it already provides adequate broadband services or has plausible investments plans in the near future of three years), such concerns will be assessed by the German authorities in accordance with paragraph 42 of the Broadband Guidelines. All information related to the aid projects (including the mapping and the call for tenders) will be published on the dedicated broadband portal of Hessen: www.breitband-in-hessen.de. b) Open tender process: the aid will be awarded on the basis of an open tender in accordance with the principles of the EU and national procurement rules. The call for tenders will be published on the dedicated webpage of Hessen: www.breitband-in-hessen.de. c) Selection of the most economically advantageous offer: within the context of an open tender, the granting authorities will select the most economically advantageous offers among those presented by the operators. In line with paragraph 51 c) of the Broadband Guidelines, for the purpose of determining the most economically advantageous offer, the awarding authority will specify in advance the relative weighting, which it will grant to each of the qualitative criteria chosen (see fn. 55 of the Broadband Guidelines). In case of identical technical specifications, the lowest bid will be awarded the contract. d) The measure is technological neutral: bidders are entitled to propose the provision of broadband services using whatever technology they deem most suitable. e) The measure ensures the use of existing infrastructure to the extent possible: bidders are given the possibility to identify the most appropriate infrastructure and to contribute their infrastructure to the notified measure. Furthermore, the municipalities and broadband providers will be requested to provide information on their existing infrastructure (both passive and active) in the Hessian Broadband Information System 10. Hessen will also publish information on ducts installation programs in the region as a result of, for instance, road constructions. In this way, the aim of the German authorities is to facilitate the use of existing infrastructures, to avoid duplications and to reduce the aid amounts necessary for the broadband projects. f) There will be a requirement to provide a wholesale access on the subsidized broadband network that will enable third party operators to compete with the 9 10 In case it is confirmed that there is no other means than State aid to provide broadband services on their territory including the use of available existing infrastructure that could be used by electronic communication operators. The Hessian Information System will provide information to all bidders on the existing infrastructures that could be potentially used in their bids (eg. free dcuts, spare fibre capacity). Furthermore, third party operators can rely, via regulation on the DT Telekom infrastructure to make their bid.

selected service provider thereby strengthening choice and competition in the areas concerned by the measure. In line with the provisions of the Broadband Guidelines, the German authorities will require that wholesale access will be in place for a minimum period of seven years without prejudice to any further regulatory obligations of the selected operators. The German authorities point out that German regulatory law allows for the need driven creation of open wholesale access, if competitors demand this, also for operators without significant market power. These operators are first given the chance to reach an agreement with their competitors. For the situation that the parties fail to reach an agreement within a reasonable time period, the German authorities confirm that wholesale access prices will be fixed (by the municipality) according to the prices fixed by the regulator for comparable situations. The national regulator (Bundesnetzagentur) will take into account the cost structure of the participating operators in the framework of an efficient offer of services (Kostenstruktur im Rahmen der effizienten Leistungsbereitstellung). The criteria for the wholesale pricing will be stipulated in the tender documents, see 51 g) of the Broadband Guidelines. g) Benchmarking pricing exercise: The German authorities confirmed that retail prices of the broadband services of the supplier will be established in the course of the selection procedure. The German authorities are aiming to provide retail broadband services in the target areas at prices similar to not supported areas. h) Monitoring and claw-back mechanism to avoid over-compensation: The project will be examined on a regular basis by the granting authority for a period of seven years and the monitoring mechanisms implemented will ensure that if the beneficiary fails to comply with the rules, the granting authorities will be in the position to recover the aid granted. Regarding the requirement of a claw-back mechanism contained in paragraph 51 h) of the Broadband Guidelines, the Commission notes that the notified scheme provides for only very small aid amounts (i.e. maximum 500.000 euros per project) and intends to support one off projects based on simple procurement principles for which a clawback mechanism would present disproportionate administrative burden. For that reason the Commission accepts that no such claw-back mechanism is required for the current scheme. Furthermore, the German authorities confirmed that it will be not allowed to artificially divide projects only to achieve that the aid amounts would fall below 500.000 euros. (13) On balance, the Commission concludes that the overall effect of the measure is deemed to be positive. The measure is in line with the objectives of Article 107(3)(c) TFEU as it facilitates the development of certain economic activities (broadband services) in certain remote and rural areas. The intervention is designed in a way that does not distort competition or adversely affect trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest.

2.3. Conclusion (14) The Commission did not receive any substantiated comments of third parties upon publication of a summary of the notification on its website. (15) On the basis of the foregoing assessment, the Commission's analysis confirms that the compatibility criteria set out in the Broadband Guidelines are met, hence the aid involved in the notified measure is compatible with Article 107(3)(c) of the TFEU. 3. DECISION (16) In the view of the above, the Commission finds that the aid granted on the basis of the measure in question is compatible with the common market in accordance with Article 107(3) (c) TFEU and has accordingly decided not to raise objections to the notified measure. (17) The Commission reminds the Federal Republic of Germany to submit annual reports on the application of the aid measure and to inform the Commission pursuant to Article 108(3) TFEU on all plans to approve a new or to modify this aid measure. In view of the duration of the scheme, the Commission would like to draw the German authorities' attention to future revisions of the Broadband Guidelines, which might make appropriate measures to the scheme necessary. (18) The Member State has indicated in the context of the notification process that the summary nature of this decision implies that it does not contain any confidential information. Yours faithfully, For the Commission Joaquín ALMUNIA Vice-President of the Commission Annex: Summary of the notification based on the information provided by the Member State according to the standard form provided in Annex to the Notice on simplified procedure.