Division/Department: Community Development / Regional Policy and Research

Similar documents
Proposed Performance Indicators for Thrive MSP 2040 For discussion at the December 19, 2012 Committee of the Whole meeting

LAND USE POLICIES BY COMMUNITY DESIGNATION

RURAL CENTER COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL CENTER ALL COMMUNITIES

URBAN CENTER COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE ALL COMMUNITIES URBAN CENTER

SUBURBAN EDGE COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE ALL COMMUNITIES SUBURBAN EDGE

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA: COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS CASE STUDY HON. STEVE KINSEY

Metropolitan Council PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN. for Transportation Planning and Programming

DIVERSIFIED RURAL COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE DIVERSIFIED RURAL ALL COMMUNITIES

Exercise 1: Policies and Action Steps

Tri-County Regional Planning Commission 2045 Regional Metropolitan Transportation Plan Goals and Objectives Adopted March 22, 2017

RURAL RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL RESIDENTIAL ALL COMMUNITIES

LAND USE POLICY

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

The Consultant (team) will be required to have knowledge and expertise in the following areas:

12 Evaluation of Alternatives

Center for Social Inclusion

THE REGION S PLAN POLICY FRAMEWORK. August 2015

REGIONAL VISION REGIONAL GOALS

Transportation and Utilities

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2050

2040 STRATEGIC PLAN. January we move people

2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT. System Statement Issue Date:

2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT. System Statement Issue Date:

2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT. System Statement Issue Date:

SOUTHEAST FLORIDA REGIONAL COMPACT CLIMATE CHANGE. Sustainable Communities & Transportation Planning

Metro Healthy Comprehensive Plans Work Group Meeting. Agenda

2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT. System Statement Issue Date:

2030 Transportation Policy Plan SUMMARY PRESENTATION. Land Use Advisory Committee November 15, 2012

December 2013 PRELIMINARY DRAFT FOR SUBMISSION AS THE REGIONAL PLAN FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Tulare County Regional Blueprint. Tulare County Regional Blueprint

09Scenario. Evaluation. CHAPTER 9: Scenario Evaluation 85. Modesto Junior College, Modesto, CA

Last revised: February 21, 2014 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT

Highest Priority Performance Measures for the TPP

Summary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans

Section 9 Implementation

2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT. System Statement Issue Date:

Committee Report. Transportation Committee. Business Item No

GUIDING PRINCIPLES MEMORANDUM

Community Vision and Core Values DRAFT SEPTEMBER 2013

2. Goals and Objectives

2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT. System Statement Issue Date:

Transit Investment Direction and Plan Introduction. Transportation Advisory Board TPP Workshop August 16, 2017

09Scenario Evaluation

Vision, Goals, and Metrics. Draft

2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT. System Statement Issue Date:

Niagara s Transportation Strategy 1. Introduction:

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR WOODLAND RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY PARK SPECIFIC PLAN FOCUS OF INPUT NOP RESPONSES

2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT. System Statement Issue Date:

SAN DIEGO FORWARD THE REGIONAL PLAN OUR REGION AT A CROSSROADS. A PLAN TO GUIDE OUR WAY. VISION. Healthy Environment & Communities

June, TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE TWIN CITIES METROPOLITAN AREA

APPENDIX A - PLANS AND POLICY REVIEW FEBRUARY 2017

STRATEGIC PLAN. Becoming Canada s Most Livable Community

Vision, Goals, and Metrics

CHAPTER 2. VISION, GOALS AND MTP FRAMEWORK

Business Item: Community Development Committee. Proposed Action. Background. Rationale. Funding. Known Support / Opposition

4: Transportation and Land Use

Base Information. 1. Project Title Hokestra Trail Realignment and Bridge Safety Improvements

part 3: reporting tools

Sustainability Metrics and Mapping Tool for Environmental Assessment of Rail Infrastructure in Illinois

Land Use and Planning Resources Report. Final Report to the Minnesota Legislature

3. STATION SPACING AND SITING GUIDELINES

That the Metropolitan Council adopt the attached Advisory Comments and Review Record, and the following:

Community Development Committee

September 2015 Governor s Transportation Vison Panel Discussion

The region we call HOME

New Climate for Transportation. How the City of San Diego and SANDAG must improve transportation to meet climate goals.

Sustainable Transportation Performance Measures

III. King County Guiding Principles

Economic Development Background Information

executive summary oregon transportation options plan Oregon Department of Transportation

Chapter 14 Work Program

Subject: City of Eagan Costco Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Review File No

Chapter 4: Transportation and Land Use

TTP220 Transportation Policy and Planning. Susan Handy 3/28/16

Community Development Committee

GMA Periodic Update Policy/Text Requirements

Environmental Assessment of Rail Infrastructure in Illinois

Chapter 3 Plan Development Framework

2017 Long Range Transportation Plan Public Engagement Plan. March 4, 2016

Congestion Management Process (CMP)

Regional Performance Measures Annual Progress Report TPO Board - 2/4/2016 Presentation by: Chris Wichman, Senior Planner

Los Angeles River Master Plan Update DRAFT Vision, Goals, and Actions

Envision Community. State of the. Report

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

Performance Measures Workshop, May 18, 2017

Mobility and System Reliability Goal

Transportation and Land Use Planning Connectivity

Growth Plan Update Capital Region Board. Capital Region Municipal Administration Information Session February 5, 2016

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan. Chapter 8: ECONOMICS

Metropolitan Council TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN (updated May 2017)

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Amendment #1

Transportation. Sustainability Plan Transportation. Help Us Create a Sustainable Lakewood: Work Group Challenge. Topics. Vision

The purpose of this presentation is to provide the Task Force with a deeper understanding of the details of the development of the Growth Plan, and

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. How Neighborhood Planning Affects Health in Globeville and Elyria Swansea

Reducing Greenhouse Gases in Portland Metro through Integrated Transportation & Land Use

Transcription:

For the Metropolitan Council meeting of December 10, 2014 Information only Subject: Status and public engagement for indicators for Thrive MSP 2040. Districts, Members: ALL Policy/Legal Reference: Thrive MSP 2040 Staff Prepared/Presented: Libby Starling, Manager of Regional Policy and Research (651-602-1135); Dan Marckel, Planning Analyst (651-602-1548); Todd Graham, Research Analyst (651-602-1322) Division/Department: Community Development / Regional Policy and Research Proposed Action Information only. Summary of Discussion/Questions In Thrive MSP 2040, the Council promises to collaboratively develop a set of Thrive indicators to assess regional progress on the Thrive outcomes and strategies. This collaborative process will engage a cross-section of the region and include voices from local government, advocacy organizations, and the region s residents to build consensus on Thrive indicators the Council will use the Thrive indicators as a foundation for continuous improvement and public accountability the Council will use the insights that emerge from analyzing the Thrive indicators to guide the Council s future decisions, including adjusting policies and priorities as needed to more effectively advance the outcomes. (Thrive MSP 2040, p.77) The presentation will: Review the status of indicators developed by staff for discussion with the larger community (see following pages); Discuss the overall approach to public engagement envisioned; Gather input from Council members.

Proposed Indicators for Thrive MSP 2040 Why develop indicators? Why measure performance? Broadly defined, organizations measure performance because What gets measured gets done. Well-crafted performance indicators identify performance problems and lead to strategies for performance improvement. What is the scope of these indicators? These indicators focus on how well the region is doing relative to the Thrive vision. (There are many important aspects of how the region is doing that are outside the scope of Thrive for example, high school graduation rates.) The number of these indicators is intentionally limited so that policymaker attention can focus on a small number of key indicators dashboard indicators. The Council is focusing attention on indicators that are linked and integrated with goals; that are understandable, maintainable, and meaningful over time; that are meaningful in communicating the Thrive vision; and that are informed by evidence-based practice and research connecting processes to ultimate outcomes. Any indicator here has a cascading set of related indicators that can and should be discussed when the high-level indicator suggests further investigation. For example, indicator 12 looks at overall investment in Areas of Concentrated Poverty; a related indicator would be the value of that investment built using Council funds. These indicators are deliberately high-level. They supplement a larger collection of indicators that are in, or are connected to, the Council s systems and policy plans. Not all concepts that are important to the Council can be quantified. For example, while public engagement is a key element of Thrive, simply counting the number of engagement opportunities or participants could easily lead to distorted outcomes that prioritize quantity over quality. Qualitative evaluation will supplement these quantitative indicators. Page - 1

1 2 3 Acreage lost to development located in (a) significant ecological and wetland areas, (b) prime agricultural areas Acres added to Metropolitan Urban Service Area beyond the 2030 MUSA Regional accessibility to destinations by auto (definition to be refined) Page - 2 Responsibly managing finite natural resources Protecting natural resources that are the foundation of prosperity Pivoting from expanding to maintaining our region s Pivoting from expanding to maintaining our region s 4 Highways in poor or worse condition Pivoting from expanding to maintaining our region s Leveraging transit investments with higher expectations of land use Share of housing in areas with multiple 5 transportation modes (that is, high frequency transit, bike paths, etc.) Creating real choices in where we live, how we across race, ethnicity, economic, and ability 6 Leveraging transit investments with higher Share of jobs in areas with multiple transportation expectations of land use modes (that is, high frequency transit, bike paths, etc.) 7 Rail intermodal yard utilization: freight lifted onto Planning for and investing in infrastructure, rail vs capacity (definition to be refined) amenities, and quality of life needed for economic competitiveness 8 Talent attraction & retention: net gain in college grads. Planning for and investing in infrastructure, amenities, and quality of life needed for economic competitiveness

9 Redevelopment: Housing units added and nonresidential construction on previously developed parcels Encouraging redevelopment and infill development 10 11 12 Affordable housing production as share of all housing production Share of transitway tracts with housing price diversity Value of new construction in Areas of Concentrated Poverty Creating real choices in where we live, how we across race, ethnicity, economic, and ability Creating real choices in where we live, how we across race, ethnicity, economic, and ability Using our influence and investment to build a more equitable region 13 Share of population living in Areas of Concentrated Poverty Using our influence and investment to build a more equitable region 14 Visits to regional parks (or visits per capita) 15 Share of workers commuting via walking, biking, transit, or rideshare Increasing access to nature and outdoor recreation through regional parks and trails Promoting healthy communities and active living through land use, planning, and investments Page - 3

16 17 Bike network miles open for use and Regional trails miles open for use. Per capita water usage: total, from surface water sources, and from groundwater sources, during May Oct, and during Nov April. Supporting bicycle and pedestrian facilities to promote bicycling for transportation, recreation, and healthy lifestyles Promoting healthy communities and active living through land use, planning, and investments Promoting the wise use of water 18 Share of groundwater monitoring sites that show increasing water levels. Promoting the wise use of water 19 Share of lakes that meet water quality target Responsibly managing finite natural resources 20 Greenhouse gas emissions per capita Providing leadership to support climate change mitigation, adaptation and resilience 21 Energy use, by energy type, in wastewater Operating wastewater treatment and transit treatment and transit operations systems sustainably Page - 4