Anthropogenic CO 2 Sources Denbury Resources Inc. March 2009

Similar documents
Denbury Resources Inc. Anthropogenic CO 2. Sources June Defining Denbury

EOR: The Economic Alternative for CCS Denbury Resources Inc. Gasification Technology Conference October 2007

CCS Corporate to CCUSPresentation

Gas/Electric Partnership CO 2 EOR Compression & Transportation

All Oil Companies Are Not Alike. NYSE: DNR CO 2 Conference

6 th Annual Wyoming CO2 Conference July 12, 2012 Casper, Wyoming Rocky Mountain Region Activities Update NYSE: DNR

Economics of Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage. Carey W. King, PhD IEA GHG Summer School July 8, 2014

SECARB Plant Barry to Citronelle

DENBURY RESOURCES INC. APRIL 10, 2008 ANALYST MEETING PRESENTATION. A Peak Oil Company 1

Safe Carbon Sequestration

US DOE Industrial CCS RD&D Program

CCUS Major Demonstrations Program Overview

Kenneth J. Nemeth Secretary & Executive Director Southern States Energy Board. CO 2 Carbon Management Workshop December 6, 2016 Midland, Texas

Gasification Project Development Progress and Challenges William Rosenberg

Status of CCUS in the United States. Jarad Daniels. Office of Fossil Energy. Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Clean Coal and Carbon Management

NYSE: DNR. Corporate Presentation August 2015

James J Dooley Joint Global Change Research Institute Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Battelle PNNL-SA-52439

Southeast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership

Lockhart Crossing: Economically Efficient Reservoir Operations

Status and Policy of CCUS in US Susan Hovorka Gulf Coast Carbon Center Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences

CO 2 Injection Surface Facility Design

A Southern States Energy Board Carbon Management Program

CO 2 -EOR. CCUS And The Fight Over Carbon Emissions. Presented to the American Action Forum. June Edward Dodge. CO 2 Injection Well

The Cost of CO 2 Capture and Storage

Fertilizer Industry Roundtable November 12, By David J. Beecy. Dale Simbeck, Vice President, Technology SFA Pacific, Inc.

Basin Electric Post Combustion CO 2 Capture Demonstration Project McIlvaine Hot Topic

Developing a Pipeline Infrastructure for CO 2 Capture and Storage: Issues and Challenges

Current Ac3vi3es of the DOE Office of Clean Coal & Carbon Management SSEB CommiFee on Clean Coal Energy Policies and Technologies

What to do with CO 2 : The Knowns and Unknowns of Geologic Sequestration and CO 2 EOR in Greenhouse Gas Context

Coal Sector Developments in the United States

Developing a Pipeline Infrastructure for CO 2 Capture and Storage: Issues and Challenges

WESTCARB 2012 Business Meeting

Southern Company/MHI Ltd. 500 TPD CCS Demonstration. Jerrad Thomas Research Engineer Southern Company Services, Inc.

2011 IEAGHG International CCS Summer School CO2 Transportation. John E. Filiatrault VP CO2 Supply and Pipelines NYSE: DNR 1

Future of Coal in America Update on CO 2 Capture & Storage Project at AEP s Mountaineer Plant

Summary of Field Test Site and Operations

Ongoing and Future Carbon Sequestration Demonstration Projects in the United States. A Kansas Perspective. Timothy R. Carr and Richard G.

Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership p( (RCSP) Initiative. Traci Rodosta, RCSP Coordinator

Presented to: CSLF Projects Interaction & Review Team Washington, D.C., USA 04 November 2013

CO 2 Capture from Steam Methane Reformers: Commercial Scale Demonstration Project

CCS Financing and Cost Reductions for Development and Deployment

Advanced Coal Technology 101

2015 SECARB Stakeholders Meeting March 11 & 12, 2015 Atlanta, GA

TRANSPORTING CO2 ACCELERATING PIPELINE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CCS Summit ACI Conf. Wash. D.C., Sept , 2010

Overview of U.S. and European Climate Change Programs. Reid Harvey, U.S. EPA Presented at LSU Energy Summit October 24, 2007

The Gulf Coast Carbon Center: Exploring Synergies between gasification and CO2 Sequestration

Carbon Dioxide Enhanced Oil Recovery

Analysis of potential pipeline infrastructure, transportation & IOGCC/SSEB PTTF REPORT

Mobile, AL March 7-8, 2012

Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Kiewit s Petra Nova CCS Project

Goldman Sachs Basic Materials Conference

Helping Pay For CO 2 Capture Projects Through Geological Sequestration of CO 2 Used for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR)

Public Workshops on Carbon Capture and Sequestration

Southeast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership A Southern States Energy Board Carbon Management Program

MAXIMIZING OIL RECOVERY EFFICIENCY AND SEQUESTRATION OF CO 2 WITH GAME CHANGER CO 2 -EOR TECHNOLOGY

MAXIMIZING OIL RECOVERY EFFICIENCY AND SEQUESTRATION OF CO 2 WITH GAME CHANGER CO 2 -EOR TECHNOLOGY

The SECARB Anthropogenic Test: CO 2 Capture/Transportation/Storage

Illinois Basin Decatur Project & ADM Industrial CCS Demonstration

Governor s Energy Summit Roanoke, West Virginia December 4, Presented by: Gerald R. Hill, Ph.D. SECARB Technical Coordinator

Technologies for CO 2 Capture From Electric Power Plants

CO 2 Capture and Storage: Options and Challenges for the Cement Industry

An Economic Development Plan for Southern Louisiana. Non-Conventional Energy: 3 Opportunities

IEA CCS Roadmap and what s next? John Gale IEAGHG on behalf of Juho Lipponen 5 th April 2015

The Growing CO 2 -EOR Oil Recovery and CO 2 Utilization Prize

Sequestration Program Overview

Adapting to New CO2 Injection Well Regulations

Revenue-Positive Incentives to Accelerate Deployment of EOR Using CO 2 Captured from Coal Generation and Other Industrial Sources:

BASIN STRATEGIES FOR LINKING CO 2 ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY AND STORAGE OF CO 2 EMISSIONS

Southern Company R&D Program Review: Strategy and Reasons for Future Optimism with CCS

Transforming American Industry through Alternative Materials. MARK COSTA Senior Vice President Corporate Strategy and Marketing

Economic Analysis of CO2 Sequestration, Utilization and Storage

The Role of EOR in CO 2 Capture and Storage Lessons and Opportunities

SECARB Early Test Retrospective

GE Energy. IGCC vs. Carbon

Prepared By: Vello A. Kuuskraa President ADVANCED RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL, INC. Arlington, VA USA

Basin Electric Power Cooperative s Approach to CO2 Capture, Transport and Sequestration Technologies

Office of Clean Coal and Carbon Management

8 th Annual Wyoming CO 2 Conference

Utility Perspective on CO 2 Sequestration

GE Energy. IGCC s Role in Advancing

Carbon Sequestration R&D Overview

Carbon Capture and Storage Current Perspectives

Carbon Sequestration, FutureGen, and Coal Gasification Development in the Illinois Basin

Major Drivers for Sequestration

SECARB Annual Stakeholders Meeting. March 7, 2012 John Litynski, PE Carbon Storage Technology Manager

Importance of 45Q and Large- Scale CO 2 -EOR and Storage

CO 2 Recovery and Sequestration at

For personal use only

CO 2 Capture and Storage - The Essential Bridge to the Hydrogen Economy

Developing Offshore Storage for Texas

A Status Report on North American CO 2 EOR Production and CO 2 Supply

DENBURY RESOURCES, INC. The People Behind the Technology 2000 Annual Report

Carbon Capture & Sequestration in the California Context

Carbon Credits: How They Can Provide An Accelerated Path for Deploying CCS

The Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Challenge: From Megatonnes to Gigatonnes

The Future of Coal. Lou Hrkman. Carbon Free Fossil Energy. Deputy Assistant Secretary Clean Coal and Carbon Management. Office of Fossil Energy

SECARB Phase II Cranfield, MS

Technology Innovation Expanding U.S. Oil and Gas Resource Potential

ILLINOIS INDUSTRIAL CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE PROJECT

Transcription:

Anthropogenic CO 2 Sources Denbury Resources Inc. March 2009

Company Snapshot Denbury is the largest oil and gas producer in the State of Mississippi Denbury currently operates twelve (12) active CO2 EOR projects in Mississippi, one (1) project in Louisiana and will initiate up to two (2) new additional projects in 2009 Denbury currently injects approximately 700 MMcf (+/-41,000 tons) of CO 2 per day into the thirteen (13) active projects Based on our injection volumes we believe we are the largest injector of additional CO 2 on a daily basis in the U.S. Denbury currently operates approximately 440 miles of CO 2 pipelines and is in the process of constructing an additional +/-320 miles of CO 2 pipelines Denbury Resources Inc. 2

US CO 2 Pipelines vs Proposed Gasification Projects Gasification Projects Existing CO 2 Pipelines Denbury Resources Inc. 3

Gulf Coast Anthropogenic Sources of CO 2 Potential Source CO 2 Contract Executed Tinsley Jackson Dome Delhi Martinville Free State Pipeline Davis Quitman Heidelberg T E X A S Lake St. John Sonat MS Pipeline Summerland Sandersville Soso Cypress Creek Eucutta Yellow Creek L O U I S I A N A Cranfield Brookhaven Olive Smithdale Mallalieu Little Creek McComb Citronelle M I S S I S S I P P I Green Pipeline Port Barre Lockhart Crossing Thornwell S Lake Arthur SW Iberia Lake Chicot Fig Ridge Hastings Oyster Bayou Denbury Resources Inc. 4

Key to Success: CO 2 Pipeline Network CO 2 pipelines operate at higher pressures (2000+ psi) than oil or natural gas pipelines CO2 EOR projects require constant supplies of relatively pure CO 2 (+/- 95%) Denbury s proposed CO 2 pipeline network will connect to both natural and man- made sources, providing flexibility to manage daily supply and demand imbalances Denbury Resources Inc. 5

Green Pipeline Project Projected Costs & Timing (Millions) 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total Right-of-way $12 $ 58 $ 17 $ 7 $ 94 Pipe & Materials -- 107 82 2 191 Engineering 1 11 48 13 73 Installation -- 26 283 63 372 Total $13 $202 $430 $85 $730 Denbury Resources Inc. 6

Anthropogenic CO 2 Issues Anthropogenic Sources Existing Sources Either low volumes < 30MMcf/d (ammonia, SMRs) Too expensive (power plants, cement plants, etc) Future Sources Gasification projects need access to capital Capital markets are essentially closed Existing and Future Sources Need assurance that CO2 EOR will qualify as permanent storage Denbury Resources Inc. 7

Existing Anthropogenic Sources Separation Compression Pipeline Uncertainty Ethanol Ammonia SMR/Amine Cement SMR/PSA Fluegas SMR/PSA Syngas Ethylene Integrated Steel Refinery NG Power Coal Power $0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $/MT CO 2 Assumptions Capture from flue gas by amine 25 mile pipeline connects each source to major CO 2 pipeline Additional $2/MT for transport in major pipeline COE - $0.05/kWh 05/kWh for utilities and $0.06/kWh for others NG - $6/MMBtu HHV Coal - $1.5/MMBtu HHV Capital recovery factor 14%/yr Denbury Resources Inc. 8

Future Anthropogenic Sources Separation Compression Pipeline Uncertainty Coal to SNG/H2 Oxyfuel IGCC $0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $/MT CO 2 Denbury Resources Inc. 9

Current Incentives Energy Improvement and Extension Act of 2008 SEC. 45Q. CREDIT FOR CARBON DIOXIDE SEQUESTRATION $20/ton for non-eor Sequestration $10/ton for man-made CO 2 utilized in CO2 EOR SEC. 116. CERTAIN INCOME AND GAINS RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL SOURCE CARBON DIOXIDE TREATED AS QUALIFYING INCOME FOR PUBLICLY TRADED PARTNERSHIPS Majority of existing CO 2 pipelines are operated by PTPs Majority of new pipeline construction is performed by PTPs SEC. 43. Enhanced Oil Recovery Credit (Obama Budget Plan would Repeal) 15% of Qualified Capital Investments Denbury Resources Inc. 10

Sequestration and CO2 EOR Regulatory Framework Exists for CO2 EOR and Sequestration Right to Inject CO 2 Exists under our Mineral Leases Injection Wells are Permitted Under Existing i EPA UIC Regulations CO 2 Pipelines are Regulated by the DOT and OPS Under Existing Regulations Oil and Gas Operations are Regulated by State Regulators Geologic Description of Reservoirs are Well Understood We know where the CO 2 will be CO2 EOR projects already perform significant MMV activities. CO2 EOR projects store CO 2 volumes from the start of injection The Only Regulatory Piece that t is Missing i is Post Injection Monitoring i Based on initial indications from regulatory workshops, the cost of post injection monitoring appears reasonable Post injection monitoring stage for CO2 EOR is 20 to 40 years into the future Denbury Resources Inc. 11

The Future is Now CO2 EOR Projects are Already Achieving Next Generation Results: A NETL report estimated CO 2 storage levels in CO2 EOR projects based on projects using Water Alternating Gas (WAG) methods; Continuous injection, 100% CO 2 (no water), stores almost double the CO 2 of WAG methods Continuous injection CO2 EOR projects inject from 0.52 to 0.64 metric tons of CO 2 for every recovered barrel of oil (which releases ~0.42 metric tons of CO 2 ), storing between 24% and 52% more CO 2 than the recovered oil will produce Advancing U.S. Energy Independence: CO2 EOR can recover billions of barrels of identified oil from existing US oilfields, providing additional domestic energy production. The environmental impact of every barrel of recovered US oil could be offset by carbon capture and storage (CCS), versus no CO 2 reduction for imported oil Infrastructure for Future CCS Solutions: A CO 2 pipeline network will enable large-scale CCS during enhanced oil recovery and in post-production utilization of underlying saline formations CO 2 pipeline networks provide the basic infrastructure needed for development of carbon solutions for environmentally-sensitive industrial developments including innovative gasification projects that can produce, power, substitute natural gas, fertilizer and chemicals from plentiful U.S. natural resources Denbury Resources Inc. 12

Summary Depending on Emission Source, Distance, Through-Put and Oil Price - CO 2 EOR can Cover All or a Portion of the Capture Costs CO2 EOR Projects Can Provide the Costs of Transportation, and Sequestration Emission sources need regulatory certainty that anthropogenic CO 2 injected and stored in CO2 EOR projects will qualify as permanent sequestration of their CO 2 emissions. (Offsets or Credits) CO2 EOR is the Only CCS Method that can be Applied Now at Commercial Scale CO2 EOR is the Only CCS Method that Generates Additional Domestic Energy in Addition to Capturing and Permanently Storing CO 2 Questions Denbury Resources Inc. 13