Minot State University Staff Satisfaction Report. May The Staff Satisfaction Survey was conducted in late April staff employees

Similar documents
2016 Survey of Employee Engagement Work Group Results

COLLEGE EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS Laramie County Community College - Spring 2016 Respondents. Mean

Employee Satisfaction Survey. Office of Institutional Research & Assessment

Institutional Strengths. Improvement Opportunities & Implementation Suggestions. Institutional Summary

2014 Employee Satisfaction Survey. New Mexico State University

Winston-Salem State University Staff Satisfaction Survey Spring 2015 N = 104

2018 Employee Climate Survey

Campus Culture, Shared Governance, Morale and Wellness

2013 IUPUI Staff Survey Summary Report

Washington State University Employee Engagement Survey Report. Prepared by: Human Resource Services August 2014

Overview of Reports Survey Results

My supervisor gives me ongoing feedback to help me improve performance I know how my department measures success.

SANTA MONICA COLLEGE 2017 College Employee Satisfaction Survey. Results and Findings

Southeast Tech Employee Survey Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Employee Survey Results Summary Report

Dartmouth College 2008 Staff Survey

The University of Tennessee Knoxville 2011 Great Colleges Survey

Performance Motivational Influencing Employees Relationship of Swissotel Le Concorde Bangkok

2016 EMPLOYEE SURVEY RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

2017 Merritt College Employee Satisfaction Survey

Staff Advisory Council Presentation to President s Advisory Council May 15, 2012

Part I. Please provide the following information about yourself (you need not write your name)

Office of Diversity Programs

Survey Results: Appendix: See our Web Page: The University of Texas at Austin 2014

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY 2011 RESULTS

Dartmouth College Employee Survey Results. April 27, 2006

2010 Employee Survey Results. May 2010

ModernThink Employee Engagement Survey Summary Report

Staff Survey Table Discussion / Supervisory Forum March 22, 2018

Section 6: Observations and Recommendations

2017 University of Arkansas Staff Climate Survey

UAF Administrative Services Work Environment Survey. Prepared for: University of Alaska, Fairbanks Administrative Services

Summary Report. Methodology

Institutional Climate Update

GRADUATE SCHOOL 2018 ADVANCING THE UNIVERSITY S MISSION: ENJOY BEING PART OF THEIR DEPARTMENT

ANA Adopted Values and Associated Behaviors. May 27, 2015

1925 San Jacinto Blvd., D3500 Phone (512) Austin, Texas Fax (512)

2015 Staff Senate Survey Results

ENJOY BEING PART OF THEIR DEPARTMENT

2018 Staff Engagement Survey Executive Summary Report. University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine

VOILAND COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE 2018

WHAT HAPPENS POST- TENURE? C A T H Y A. T R O W E R, P H. D.

50 EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT. IDEAS and TIPS A LEADER S GUIDE TO EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT

Table of Contents. Merit Handbook UM System. 1 Page

COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURAL, HUMAN & NATURAL RESOURCE SCIENCES 2018

Office of the Vice President and Associate Provost for Diversity 2015 Diversity Plan Accountability Report (Due 12/08/15)

Design Recruitment and support of a diverse student population.

Finance and Administration. Data Report

2007 Kansas State University Community and Climate Survey

2009 Smithsonian Employee Perspective Survey Office of Policy and Analysis Smithsonian Institution December 2009

BACKGROUND KEY FINDINGS

WUPRPM. Regulations and Procedures Effective Date: January 26, 2007 D. Classification and Compensation Revision Date: N/A.

Global Employee Engagement Survey MAY 2017 GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT SURVEY 2017

Employee retention: It starts at the top. Culture, engagement and top performance best practices for CEOs

City of Charlotte Employee Survey. Citywide Survey Results

Work Expectations Profile

The Role of the Manager in Impacting Employee Engagement. Presented by: Kerry Liberman, President People Perspectives LLC

HOLISTIC APPROACH TO BUILDING MORALE AND MOTIVATING TEAM MEMBERS. Joseph (Joe) D. Launi, PMP President Project Management Experts, LLC

Summary of Results DESIGN, COLLEGE OF. Faculty Results January 2014

Summary of Results DESIGN, COLLEGE OF. Staff Results. January 2014

JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC RESEARCH FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY Impact Factor 2.417, ISSN: , Volume 3, Issue 9, October 2015

COURSE CATALOG. vadoinc.net

Woodland Community College and Clear Lake Campus. College Employee Satisfaction Survey Results. Peter Cammish

Employer Survey 2015

Standard Administrative Policy and Procedure

DEAF DIRECT: Performance Management Policy: April Performance Management Policy

The College of William and Mary University Human Resources System. A Guide for Classified Employees

December 7, CFPB Annual Employee Survey

Introduction. Xavier Barcons Director General. Credit: ESO/M. Zamani

COMMITMENT, DEDICATION EXCELLENCE, SERVICE, INNOVATION RECOGNIZE EMPLOYEES CELEBRATE OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTIONS THANK YOU, WELL DONE

Wisconsin Department of Revenue: Enhancing Employee Engagement Tuesday, June 14, 2016

University of Southern Indiana Employee Town Hall Presentation L O C K T O N C O M P A N I E S

CAFE Department of Agricultural Economics Work-Life Goals

Conducting Performance Reviews Kurtis Neal, SPHR Director of Human Resources

Staff Survey september - october 2016 results. Voice Project

2015 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey Results for: National Park Service

2018 EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS

Objectives Content (Topics) Teaching/Learning Resources Understand the vital role of leadership in achieving success.

Creating Effective Teams and Teamwork: The Skills Driving High Performance Organizations

Bayt.com Employee Motivation Report in the Middle East and North Africa. January 2013

Finance Division. Strategic Plan

University of Kentucky 2017 Engagement Survey. Human Resources Overall

Simmons College. Policy on Additional Compensation and Discretionary Bonuses for Exempt Staff with notations for Non-exempt Staff; and

Job Description. Director, Athletics & Recreation. Vice Provost, Student Engagement. Job purpose

MANAGER PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT INSTRUMENT

This report was obtained (via FOIA) and posted by AltGov2.

YSU CAMPUS CLIMATE SURVEY REPORT STAFF

COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK POLICY

Aligning Performance Assessment with Organizational Goals: Moving beyond a Transactional view

BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION DECEMBER BCFP Annual Employee Survey Results

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

Southeast Technical Institute JOB DESCRIPTION. Vice President of Academic Affairs

Jeffco Public Schools

Coconino Community College Employee Opinion Survey

Employee Performance Review

Thank You! SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY

Equity Action Plan. Department of Facilities Management Division of Construction

ASSESSING JOB SATISFACTION LEVEL OF EMPLOYEES IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL -A TOOL FOR TALENT RETENTION

UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY Policies and Procedures

EASING THE TRANSITION

Transcription:

Minot State University Staff Satisfaction Report May 08 The Staff Satisfaction Survey was conducted in late April 08. 7 staff employees were invited to participate. Invitations to participate were sent to the employees Minot State email. The survey period was open for two weeks and several reminders to participate were sent. At the close of the survey 6 responses were collected, yielding a 6% response rate. A majority of respondents were female (6.%) and just over half (.%) held a current position of Administrative/Professional Staff. Nearly all of the respondents, (9.%) were full-time employees at Minot State. Years of experience varied with.% indicating they have been employed at Minot State for - years,.% serving 6-0 years at Minot State. The Staff Satisfaction Survey was broken into five sections, Job Satisfaction, State of the Institution, State of the Staff, Support Services, and Staff Governance. Minot State staff were asked to indicate their level of satisfaction to numerous statements under each of the five sections. After indicating the level of satisfaction to statements, the participant was given the opportunity to provide comments. Below is a summary of the comments. Job Satisfaction ( individual comments) Areas of Concern: Administration does not address issues as they arise Compression issues- Compensation and salary issues need to be addressed Staff should be recognized and appreciated for the extra work that they do Flexible work schedules are needed (summer hours, holiday hours, work from home) Morale is low, there is a struggle to remain positive Lack of professional development opportunities Co-Worker relationships are strained Lack of leadership in management- Lack of action by administrator Continued budget concerns are discouraging Need for more collaboration among departments Positive Comments: Satisfaction with job New to campus nothing negative to say

State of the Institution (8 individual comments) Areas of Concern: Lack of professional development opportunities Inequitable salaries Lack of collaboration among offices Administration does not address issues that arise Lack of mission or future plans- Lack of action Morale issues among staff Lack of recognition in light of many doing extra or additional duties Lack of relationship among faculty and staff- Faculty need to be held accountable Campus sustainability needs to be addressed Departmental budget issues remain a concern Positive Comments: Administration- leadership State of the Staff (6 individual comments) Areas of Concern: Lack of collaboration-teamwork among offices- unity Lack of motivation of staff Lack of leadership from the administrative staff Lack of transparency at the executive level Abuse of time by non-hourly staff Faculty and staff relationships Administration does not address issues that arise Positive Comments: Administration- Leadership allows for independence and support Pride in staff responses to ongoing budget issues Support Services (9 individual comments) Areas of Concern: Human Resources Office Food Services Switchboard/Mail room International Office Enrollment Services President s Office MSU Website Facilities Management Positive Comments: President s Office Student Health/Counseling Services

Staff Governance (8 individual comments) Areas of Concern: Administration needs to improve Prioritize activities to address morale and work environment Staff Senate is not taken seriously- Complaints are not addressed Customer Service Positive Comments: Has gotten better overtime-great efforts being made by Staff Senate High Five Award- Raising morale

Cari Olson, Staff Senate Satisfaction Survey 08 Cari Olson Staff Senate Satisfaction Survey 08 No. of responses = 6 Overall indicators Global Index. State of the Institution: Select the option that best describes your level of agreement or disagreement with the following statements concerning the institution av.=.7 av.=.7 Survey Results Legend Question text Absolute Frequencies of answers Relative Frequencies of answers Left pole % Mean 0% 0 % Right pole n=no. of responses av.=mean ab.=abstention Scale Histogram. Job Satisfaction: Select the option that best describes your level of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the following aspects of your role as a staff member..) Opportunity to implement new ideas. 7% 7.% 7 6.%.% 6 n= av.=.8 ab.=.) Recruiting of students. 7% 8 8.% 6.% 0.% n=06 av.=.8 ab.=8.) Working conditions (hours, location, etc)..% 66.8% 7.%.6% 8 n= av.=.97.) Autonomy and Independence. 0.% 68 8.% 8.8%.% n= av.=.8.) Professional relationships with other staff employees. 6.7% 7 0.%.9%.% n= av.=.88.6) Social relationships with other staff. 9 7.% 7 0.7% 7 8.8%.% n= av.=.99 ab.= 0//08 Class Climate Evaluation Page

Cari Olson, Staff Senate Satisfaction Survey 08.7) Competence of colleagues. 6.8% 7 0.%.%.8% n= av.=.0.8) Relationship with administration. 0 8.% 69 8.6% 8 9.7%.% n= av.=.99 ab.=.9) I feel secure in my job..% % 9 8 6.% 8.% n= av.=.9.0) This institution listens to its employees. 0.% 6 8.9% 6.8% 0.9% n= av.=. ab.=.) This institution involves its employees in planning for the future. 7.% 66 6.8% 7 6.%.9% n= av.=. ab.=.) This institution regularly conducts surveys to evaluate the quality of its programs and services. 6.% 78.7% 7 6.% 6.% 9 n=0 av.=.8 ab.=.) Each department or work unit has written, up-todate service expectations. 8.% 8.%.% 8.% n=7 av.=. ab.=8.) Processes for selecting, orientating, training, empowering and recognizing employees are carefully planned. 6.% 0% 0% 6 6 8.6% n=0 av.=.66 ab.=.) Employees are empowered to resolve problems quickly. 0.8% 66.% 7.% 8.% n= av.=..6) Employees are rewarded for outstanding job performance. 8.%.% 6 9.7% 0 8.% n= av.=.88 ab.=.7) Employees are encouraged to provide suggestions on ways to improve work flow. 8.7% 6.% % 6.% n= av.=. ab.=.8) Overall job satisfaction. 6 8.6% 78.7%.9%.9% n=0 av.=. 0//08 Class Climate Evaluation Page

Cari Olson, Staff Senate Satisfaction Survey 08. State of the Institution: Select the option that best describes your level of agreement or disagreement with the following statements concerning the institution.) MSU has clear long-range plans. % 9 7.7%.% 8.% n=6 av.=.6 ab.=8.) MSU has strategies in place addressing campus sustainability. 9.% 8 60.% 9 0.9% 9.% n=9 av.=. ab.=.) MSU provides an engaging campus atmosphere. 6.9% 9 6.8% 6 8.% n= av.=.0 ab.=.) At MSU salaries and raises are equitable. % 7.6% 8.% 7.% n=0 av.=.0 ab.=.) The MSU administration effectively works with the staff employees to achieve common goals. 0.% 76 6.7%.6% 8.% n= av.=. ab.=8.6) This institution has "user-friendly" computer systems to assist employees and students. 8 9.9% 8 9.6%.9%.7% 8 n= av.=.06 ab.=.7) This institution promotes excellent employeeadministration relationships. 7.% 8 8.%.8% % 7 n= av.=. ab.=.8) Established standards and procedures define job expectations for employees..6% 8 8.9%.7%.8% n= av.=. ab.=.9) Job responsibilities are communicated clearly to employees..% 8 9.%.%.8% n= av.=. ab.=.0) This institution analyzes complaints to determine appropriate remedial actions. 0.% 76 8.9% % 7% 9 n=9 av.=.8 ab.=.) Staff input is systematically monitored and measured as a basis for improvement. 9.6% 6.% 6.% 7.% 0 n= av.=.7 ab.=8.) The institution uses teams/committees to solve problems..7% 9 67.9% 0.%.% n=0 av.=.0 ab.= 0//08 Class Climate Evaluation Page

Cari Olson, Staff Senate Satisfaction Survey 08.) There is a spirit of teamwork and cooperation in this organization. 0.% 6.% 8.8% 7.7% n= av.=. ab.=.) This institution analyzes all relevant data before making decisions. 7.7% 0 7 6.% 0 0.8%.% 7 n=0 av.=. ab.=.) This institution believes in continuous quality improvement. 7.% 8 60.%.%.% 7 n=8 av.=. ab.=.6) The mission, purpose and values of this institution are familiar to employees. 9.% 96 67.6% 6.9%.% n= av.=.08 ab.=.7) This institution provides adequate financial/budget support for departments/ work units. 7.% 0 60.%.7% 8% n=9 av.=.6 ab.=.8) The MSU administration promotes academic excellence. 6.9% 9 66.9% 7.%.7% n=6 av.=.0 ab.=6. State of the Staff: Select the option that best describes your level of agreement or disagreement with the following statements concerning staff employees..) MSU staff promote academic excellence. 8 7.7% 9 66.%.8% 8 n=7 av.=.78 ab.=8.) I have a feeling of ownership and control when it comes to the future direction of MSU. 7.% 8.% 9.6% 9.7% n=9 av.=. ab.=.) I am actively seeking employment at other institutions/organizations. 6.6% 8 0 6.%.%.6% n= av.=. ab.=.) I know what is expected of me. 8.% 9% 8 6.% 9.% n= av.=.76.) I am satisfied with the work of others around me..% 78.% 7.%.% 6 n= av.=.0 ab.=.6) I feel staff work well together. 8 6.6% 8 7.% 8.6%.% n= av.=.9 ab.= 0//08 Class Climate Evaluation Page

Cari Olson, Staff Senate Satisfaction Survey 08.7) I feel staff and faculty work well together..% 7.% 7.% 9.% n=8 av.=.8 ab.=.8) My supervisor helps me improve my job performance. 8.% 68 8.9%.8% 8 7.% 0 n=9 av.=.8 ab.=. I receive adequate support/services from:.) My specific department within my college.7% 69.6% 7.% 9.% n= av.=.77 ab.=0.) The Business Office 0 0.% 8 6.9%.% 7.% n= av.=.78 ab.=0.) The Center for Extended Learning 7 9.% 68 76.%.%.% n=89 av.=.87 ab.=.) Enrollment Services.% 6% 67 7.8% 8.9% n=0 av.=.9 ab.=9.) Human Resources 8 0.% 7.7% 0.6% 0.% n=7 av.=. ab.=7.6) Library.% 67 7.% 0.% n=90 av.=.97 ab.=.7) Facilities Management (maintenance, custodial) 6% 0 % 7 9.% 0.7% n=9 av.=.7 ab.=6.8) Cafeteria/food services 8.9% 67.% 6% 0.6% n= av.=.8 ab.=0.9) Marketing Office 0 8.9% 6 8.% 7% 8.7% 6 n=06 av.=.09 ab.=6.0) University Communications (Public Information Office) 7.% 79 66.9% 0.8% 0.8% n=8 av.=.7 ab.= 0//08 Class Climate Evaluation Page

Cari Olson, Staff Senate Satisfaction Survey 08.) Financial Aid Office 6.6% 6 60.%.% n=9 av.=.67 ab.=0.) Counseling Services 9.% 7% 6.8% n=7 av.=.88 ab.=69.) IT Central 7.9% 67 9.%.% 7.7% n=6 av.=.7 ab.=9.) Payroll Office 9.8% 77.8%.% n=8 av.=.9 ab.=7.) Bookstore 7.6% 6 9.6%.8% n=09 av.=.6 ab.=6.6) Campus Information/Switchboard.% 60 8.8% 0.8%.9% 6 n=0 av.=.98 ab.=.7) President's Office 9.9% 7 6.% 6.8% 8.7% n=7 av.=.8 ab.=6.8) Vice President of Academic Affairs Office 7.% 6.8% 6.% 7 0.9% n= av.=.7 ab.=0.9) Vice President of Student Affairs Office 7 6.% 6 9.% 9.7% 0.9% n=0 av.=.9 ab.=0.0) Health and nursing services. 0.7% 6.%.% n=8 av.=.6 ab.=9.) Registrar's Office 6.% 60 7.% 6.7% 7.9% n=0 av.=.76 ab.=6.) Security/police services. 9 0.% 70 7.%.% n= av.=.6 ab.=8 0//08 Class Climate Evaluation Page 6

Cari Olson, Staff Senate Satisfaction Survey 08.) Center for Engaged Teaching and Learning (CETL) 8 0.% 7% 66.%.% n=88 av.=.8 ab.=.) Mail Room 7.9% 76 6.% 7.% 9.% n= av.=.8 ab.=.) POWER Center % 7% 60 7.% 6.% n=80 av.=.98 ab.=6. Staff Governance: Select the option that best describes your level of agreement or disagreement with the following statements concerning staff governance..) I am satisfied with the overall effectiveness of staff governance at MSU. 0.9% 7% 98 7.% 0.7% n=8 av.=.08 ab.=7.) The Staff Senate's role at MSU is clear. 9.8% 76 7.% 0 0.% % n= av.=.6 ab.=.) I am aware of Staff Senate activities. 9 0.9% 80 7.6% 8 0.%.% n=9 av.=.0 ab.=.) Staff senators report and solicit information from colleagues in their respective area..% 7.% 7 7.8% 6.8% 9 n= av.=. ab.=0.) The administration takes Staff Senate decisions seriously. 9% 70 7.% 7.9%.7% 7 n= av.=. ab.=9.6) Administrators treat employees well. 9.% 9 69.% 7.% 0.% n=6 av.=.9 ab.=6.7) Administrators cultivate positive relationships with students. 7 9.9% 99 7.8% 6.6% 9 0.7% n=6 av.=.88 ab.=7.8) Administrators are committed to providing quality service. 6 6.% 9 67.9%.% 6.% n=7 av.=.8 ab.=7.9) Administrators set examples if quality service in their day-to-day performance. 0.6% 8 6.9% 7.8% 0.8% n= av.=.9 ab.=9 0//08 Class Climate Evaluation Page 7

Cari Olson, Staff Senate Satisfaction Survey 08.0) Administrators recognize staff employees when they do a good job. 7 9.% 6% 6.% 0.% n=9 av.=. ab.=.) Administrators pay attention to what I have to say. 9.6% 69.% 7 0.% 6.7% 9 n= av.=. ab.=.) Administrators have confidence and trust in me..% 8 6.9% 0.6% % n= av.=.9 ab.=.) Administrators share information regularly with staff employees. 8.% 6.7% 8 7.% 8.7% n=8 av.=.7 ab.=6.) Employees receive special training in improving customer service. 9.7%.% 6 7.% 7.7% n= av.=.6 ab.=8.) Employees are involved in the development and improvement of performance measures. 8.8% 9.%.% 0.% n=0 av.=. ab.=.6) Employees suggestions are used to improve our institution. 7.% 6 6.9% 7 8.%.% n=0 av.=.8 ab.= 6. In your opinion, how important is diversity to the following groups at MSU? 6.) Faculty members Very Important.% 66.% 0.8%.%.% Unimportant n= av.=.9 6.) Staff and administrators Very Important 7.% 6.8%.% 6.% 9.% Unimportant n= av.=.0 6.) Student government Very Important 6 9.% 6.% 0.6%.% 6.% Unimportant n= av.=.8 6.) MSU students Very Important 9.% 60.% 6.%.9% 7 Unimportant n= av.=.8 8. Demographic Information: Please supply the following information about yourself and position at MSU. 0//08 Class Climate Evaluation Page 8

Cari Olson, Staff Senate Satisfaction Survey 08 8.) What is your gender? Male.% Female 6.% Transgender-Female 0% Transgender-Male 0% Genderqueering/Gender-nonconforming 0% Other 0% Chose not to respond.% n= av.=. 8.) What is your current position? Support staff 0.% Administrative/professional staff.% Student worker 0% Other 8.% n=8 av.=.06 8.) Employment Status Full-time regular 9.% Part-time regular.% Full-time temporary 0.7% Part-time temporary 0.7% n=6 av.=.08 8.) How many years of service to MSU? Less than year 7.% - years.% 6-0 years.% - years.% 6-0 years.9% + years 6.6% n=6 0//08 Class Climate Evaluation Page 9

Cari Olson, Staff Senate Satisfaction Survey 08 Profile Subunit: Name of the instructor: Name of the course: (Name of the survey) General Surveys Cari Olson Staff Senate Satisfaction Survey 08 Values used in the profile line: Mean. Job Satisfaction: Select the option that best describes your level of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the following aspects of your role as a staff member..) Opportunity to implement new ideas. Not at all Satisfied n= av.=.8 md=.00 dev.=0.76.) Recruiting of students. Not at all Satisfied n=06 av.=.8 md=.00 dev.=0.87.) Working conditions (hours, location, etc). Not at all Satisfied n= av.=.97 md=.00 dev.=0.8.) Autonomy and Independence. Not at all Satisfied n= av.=.8 md=.00 dev.=0.78.) Professional relationships with other staff employees. Not at all Satisfied n= av.=.88 md=.00 dev.=0.7.6) Social relationships with other staff. Not at all Satisfied n= av.=.99 md=.00 dev.=0.78.7) Competence of colleagues. Not at all Satisfied n= av.=.0 md=.00 dev.=0.76.8) Relationship with administration. Not at all Satisfied n= av.=.99 md=.00 dev.=0.79.9) I feel secure in my job. Not at all Satisfied n= av.=.9 md=.00 dev.=0.90.0) This institution listens to its employees. Not at all Satisfied n= av.=. md=.00 dev.=0.86.) This institution involves its employees in planning for the future..) This institution regularly conducts surveys to evaluate the quality of its programs and services..) Each department or work unit has written, upto-date service expectations..) Processes for selecting, orientating, training, empowering and recognizing employees are carefully planned..) Employees are empowered to resolve problems quickly..6) Employees are rewarded for outstanding job performance..7) Employees are encouraged to provide suggestions on ways to improve work flow. Not at all Satisfied n= av.=. md=.00 dev.=0.89 Not at all Satisfied n=0 av.=.8 md=.00 dev.=0.7 Not at all Satisfied n=7 av.=. md=.00 dev.=0.88 Not at all Satisfied n=0 av.=.66 md=.00 dev.=0.9 Not at all Satisfied n= av.=. md=.00 dev.=0.8 Not at all Satisfied n= av.=.88 md=.00 dev.=0.9 Not at all Satisfied n= av.=. md=.00 dev.=0.8.8) Overall job satisfaction. Not at all Satisfied n=0 av.=.0 md=.00 dev.=0.7. State of the Institution: Select the option that best describes your level of agreement or disagreement with the following statements concerning the institution.) MSU has clear long-range plans. Disagree n=6 av.=.6 md=.00 dev.=0.80 0//08 Class Climate Evaluation Page 0

Cari Olson, Staff Senate Satisfaction Survey 08.) MSU has strategies in place addressing campus sustainability..) MSU provides an engaging campus atmosphere. Disagree n=9 av.=.0 md=.00 dev.=0.77 Disagree n= av.=.0 md=.00 dev.=0.60.) At MSU salaries and raises are equitable. Disagree n=0 av.=.0 md=.00 dev.=0.90.) The MSU administration effectively works with the staff employees to achieve common goals..6) This institution has "user-friendly" computer systems to assist employees and students..7) This institution promotes excellent employeeadministration relationships..8) Established standards and procedures define job expectations for employees..9) Job responsibilities are communicated clearly to employees..0) This institution analyzes complaints to determine appropriate remedial actions..) Staff input is systematically monitored and measured as a basis for improvement..) The institution uses teams/committees to solve problems..) There is a spirit of teamwork and cooperation in this organization..) This institution analyzes all relevant data before making decisions..) This institution believes in continuous quality improvement..6) The mission, purpose and values of this institution are familiar to employees..7) This institution provides adequate financial/ budget support for departments/ work units..8) The MSU administration promotes academic excellence. Disagree n= av.=. md=.00 dev.=0.77 Disagree n= av.=.06 md=.00 dev.=0.76 Disagree n= av.=. md=.00 dev.=0.7 Disagree n= av.=. md=.00 dev.=0.70 Disagree n= av.=. md=.00 dev.=0.69 Disagree n=9 av.=.8 md=.00 dev.=0.7 Disagree n= av.=.7 md=.00 dev.=0.77 Disagree n=0 av.=.0 md=.00 dev.=0.6 Disagree n= av.=. md=.00 dev.=0.8 Disagree n=0 av.=. md=.00 dev.=0.70 Disagree n=8 av.=.0 md=.00 dev.=0.7 Disagree n= av.=.08 md=.00 dev.=0.6 Disagree n=9 av.=.60 md=.00 dev.=0.86 Disagree n=6 av.=.0 md=.00 dev.=0.67. State of the Staff: Select the option that best describes your level of agreement or disagreement with the following statements concerning staff employees..) MSU staff promote academic excellence. Disagree n=7 av.=.78 md=.00 dev.=0..) I have a feeling of ownership and control when it comes to the future direction of MSU..) I am actively seeking employment at other institutions/organizations. Disagree n=9 av.=. md=.00 dev.=0.88 Disagree n= av.=. md=.00 dev.=0.9.) I know what is expected of me. Disagree n= av.=.76 md=.00 dev.=0.6.) I am satisfied with the work of others around me. Disagree n= av.=.0 md=.00 dev.=0.77.6) I feel staff work well together. Disagree n= av.=.9 md=.00 dev.=0.7.7) I feel staff and faculty work well together. Disagree n=8 av.=.8 md=.00 dev.=0.86.8) My supervisor helps me improve my job performance. Disagree n=9 av.=.8 md=.00 dev.=0.8 0//08 Class Climate Evaluation Page

Cari Olson, Staff Senate Satisfaction Survey 08. I receive adequate support/services from:.) My specific department within my college Disagree n= av.=.77 md=.00 dev.=0.68.) The Business Office Disagree n= av.=.78 md=.00 dev.=0.6.) The Center for Extended Learning Disagree n=89 av.=.87 md=.00 dev.=0.0.) Enrollment Services Disagree n=0 av.=.9 md=.00 dev.=0.68.) Human Resources Disagree n=7 av.=. md=.00 dev.=0.86.6) Library Disagree n=90 av.=.97 md=.00 dev.=0..7) Facilities Management (maintenance, custodial) Disagree n=9 av.=.7 md=.00 dev.=0.6.8) Cafeteria/food services Disagree n= av.=.8 md=.00 dev.=0.79.9) Marketing Office Disagree n=06 av.=.09 md=.00 dev.=0.76.0) University Communications (Public Information Office) Disagree n=8 av.=.7 md=.00 dev.=0..) Financial Aid Office Disagree n=9 av.=.67 md=.00 dev.=0..) Counseling Services Disagree n=7 av.=.88 md=.00 dev.=0.0.) IT Central Disagree n=6 av.=.7 md=.00 dev.=0.7.) Payroll Office Disagree n=8 av.=.9 md=.00 dev.=0..) Bookstore Disagree n=09 av.=.6 md=.00 dev.=0..6) Campus Information/Switchboard Disagree n=0 av.=.98 md=.00 dev.=0.77.7) President's Office Disagree n=7 av.=.80 md=.00 dev.=0.6.8) Vice President of Academic Affairs Office Disagree n= av.=.7 md=.00 dev.=0.6.9) Vice President of Student Affairs Office Disagree n=0 av.=.9 md=.00 dev.=0.7.0) Health and nursing services. Disagree n=8 av.=.6 md=.00 dev.=0.0.) Registrar's Office Disagree n=0 av.=.76 md=.00 dev.=0.66.) Security/police services. Disagree n= av.=.6 md=.00 dev.=0..) Center for Engaged Teaching and Learning (CETL) Disagree n=88 av.=.8 md=.00 dev.=0..) Mail Room Disagree n= av.=.8 md=.00 dev.=0.66.) POWER Center Disagree n=80 av.=.98 md=.00 dev.=0.7 0//08 Class Climate Evaluation Page

Cari Olson, Staff Senate Satisfaction Survey 08. Staff Governance: Select the option that best describes your level of agreement or disagreement with the following statements concerning staff governance..) I am satisfied with the overall effectiveness of staff governance at MSU. Disagree n=8 av.=.08 md=.00 dev.=0..) The Staff Senate's role at MSU is clear. Disagree n= av.=.6 md=.00 dev.=0.67.) I am aware of Staff Senate activities. Disagree n=9 av.=.0 md=.00 dev.=0.69.) Staff senators report and solicit information from colleagues in their respective area..) The administration takes Staff Senate decisions seriously. Disagree n= av.=.0 md=.00 dev.=0.76 Disagree n= av.=.0 md=.00 dev.=0.7.6) Administrators treat employees well. Disagree n=6 av.=.90 md=.00 dev.=0.6.7) Administrators cultivate positive relationships with students..8) Administrators are committed to providing quality service..9) Administrators set examples if quality service in their day-to-day performance..0) Administrators recognize staff employees when they do a good job..) Administrators pay attention to what I have to say..) Administrators have confidence and trust in me..) Administrators share information regularly with staff employees..) Employees receive special training in improving customer service..) Employees are involved in the development and improvement of performance measures..6) Employees suggestions are used to improve our institution. Disagree n=6 av.=.88 md=.00 dev.=0. Disagree n=7 av.=.8 md=.00 dev.=0.8 Disagree n= av.=.9 md=.00 dev.=0.6 Disagree n=9 av.=. md=.00 dev.=0.89 Disagree n= av.=. md=.00 dev.=0.8 Disagree n= av.=.9 md=.00 dev.=0.68 Disagree n=8 av.=.7 md=.00 dev.=0.86 Disagree n= av.=.6 md=.00 dev.=0.89 Disagree n=0 av.=. md=.00 dev.=0.9 Disagree n=0 av.=.8 md=.00 dev.=0.86 6. In your opinion, how important is diversity to the following groups at MSU? 6.) Faculty members Very Important Unimportant 6.) Staff and administrators Very Important Unimportant 6.) Student government Very Important Unimportant 6.) MSU students Very Important Unimportant n= av.=.9 md=.00 dev.=0.90 n= av.=.0 md=.00 dev.=0.9 n= av.=.8 md=.00 dev.=0.88 n= av.=.80 md=.00 dev.=0.8 0//08 Class Climate Evaluation Page