LOGISTICAL MANAGEMENT BREAKBULK MIDDLE EAST ABU DHABI, UAE HEIN HEYSTER OCTOBER 28, 2015 1
BOSKALIS COMPANY INTRO 4
BOSKALIS OVERVIEW 5
OUR FLEET 23 Semi-submersible heavy-lift vessels Carrying capacity up to 117,000 MT 10 Floating sheerlegs Capacity from 400 to 5,000 MT Free deck space 70 m x 275 MT 2 Fall Pipe Vessels Capacity from 18,000 to 24,000 MT 107 Dredgers Trailing suction hopper dredgers Cutter suction dredgers Backhoes Floating grab cranes 165 Barges Hopper barges, capacity 50 to 3,800 MT Oceangoing semi, capacity 21,000 MT Oceangoing flat top, capacity from 1,000 to 14,000 MT Inland barges, capacity from 100 to 2,000 MT 424 Tugs Anchor handling, capacity > 2,239 kw Coastal / Harbor, capacity from 358 to 5,224 kw Harbor / River (pusher), capacity from 75 to 2,089 kw 3 Multi Purpose / cable lay vessel 151 Support Vessels Diving support vessels Launches Work / Supply vessels 6
Logistical Management Solutions Turnkey logistical services for onshore industrial projects. 7
LOGISTICAL MANAGEMENT: THE ONE-STOP SHOP SOLUTION Single interface management partner Heavy transportation vessels Tug and barge Dock type ships Self geared ships Complete project management solution Grillage & sea-fastening design, fabrication and installation Engineering studies Management of risk Partnering with SPMT providers, freight forwarding, civil engineering Scope outside of transportation MOF design and construction Land reclamation Dredging Environmental monitoring Offshore installation 8
LOGISTICAL MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS: HYBRID SOLUTION Complete and robust logistics solutions Supplementing our vessels with 3 rd party tonnage Source most suitable vessel for the solution One contract one interface Flexible contracting approach Ability to offer services outside of core business 9
LOGISTICAL MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS: Direct on-deck stowage 10
LOGISTICAL MANAGEMENT PROJECT: KONIAMBO CLIENT: Hatch / Technip PERIOD: 2010 LOCATION: Qingdao, China to New Caledonia SCOPE: Transport 18 nickel plant modules in 4 voyages. Scope of work included detailed engineering of grillage and sea fastening to ensure safe transport of the modules across the swells of the Pacific Ocean. KEY ASSETS INVOLVED: m/v Trustee 11
STERN OR SIDE LOAD-OUT / IN STERN LOAD-OUT SIDE LOAD-OUT More compact on the quay, single trailer path Less compact in harbor area Long distance to final positon More ballast / weight capacity Large quay length / space required Cargo length limitation due to parallel trailer paths Short distance to final position Less ballast / weight capacity 14
TYPICAL LOAD-OUT / IN PROCEDURES 1. Mooring alongside 2. Outfitting grillage installation 3. Mooring stern to quay 4. Ballasting 5. Ramp installation 6. Module roll-on 7. Sea-fastening 8. Voyage 15
LOGISTICAL MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS: Piggy-back concept 24
INTRODUCTION PIGGY-BACK 1. Mobilization 2. Module loading 3. Float-on 4. Voyage 5. Float-off 6. Module discharge 25
ADVANTAGES OF PIGGY BACK SOLUTION Shallow draft coastal and estuarial sites accessible without major modifications Can be used as floating storage at the loading and discharge locations Increased vessel utilization with approx. 40% leading to cost efficiency and lower overall cost Reduces the dependency on constricted open-stern market Provides a solution for environmental / regulatory challenges Increase stowage / voyage performance by adding deck space Roll-on module Float-on barge Voyage Float-off barge Roll-off module - Vessel Utilization - Barge Utilization 28
LOGISTICAL MANAGEMENT PROJECT: WHEATSTONE LNG CLIENT: Bechtel / Chevron PERIOD: 2014-2015 LOCATION: Lumut, Malaysia / Tianjin, China to Onlsow, Australia SCOPE: Transportation of 119 modules for the fabrication of the onshore LNG facilities at Onslow in Australia. Transport methods: Direct on-deck of the HTV Piggy-back Tug & Barge KEY ASSETS: Semi-submersible heavy lift vessels (Fjord, Fjell, T-class vessels and Super Servant 3). Giant 5, Giant 6 and other barges (3rd party) 29
LOGISTICAL MANAGEMENT PROJECT: METHANOL PLANT RELOCATION CLIENT: Mammoet / Methanex Corp. PERIOD: 2013 LOCATION: Punta Arenas, Chile to Geismar, LA U.S. SCOPE: Transportation of 19 modules in 2 consecutive voyages. Modules were transported via piggy-back method, utilizing a S-class type vessel and two barges (FSPs). KEY ASSETS: m/v Swan (2) Barges / Floating Super Pallets 30
VOYAGE ENGINEERING PHASE Voyage plan optimal route will be determined Environmental conditions determined by global wave statistics database 2. Voyage Motions will be calculated in cog of cargo and system input for grillage design Extreme design forces will be calculated input for sea-fastening design. ACTUAL VOYAGE Continuous route monitoring changes upon Captain s discretion Receive weather forecast via SPOS (ship performance optimization system) continuously Acceleration monitoring system: Octopus 32 32
TRANSPORTATION STUDY DELIVERABLES INCLUDE Maximum cargo dimensions for transportation Vessel and barge capacity needed for the project Transhipment needs and locations Temporary intermediate storage SPMT operations/arrangements Provisional schedule for deliveries from fabrication yard to construction site Risk assessment Local content requirements Seafastening and grillage design Budgetary price information Partnerships with SPMT and geared vessel owners 33
SIMULATION FLEET PLANNING TOOL IDEA BEHIND THE SIMULATION TOOL Reduce the time required to develop a logistical planning Enhance possibility to evaluate multiple scenarios, including competitors Improve insight into bottle necks Monitor asset utilization Include disturbances: weather, module delivery, MOF availability, restricted voyages, seasonal leg availability Evaluate scenario reliability 34
LOGISTICAL MANAGEMENT PROJECT: GORGON LNG CLIENT: KJV / Chevron PERIOD: 2012 2014 LOCATION: Korea / Indonesia / China to Barrow Island, Australia SCOPE: Transportation of 50+ modules from various fabrication yards in a long term time charter contract. Prior to voyage, all vessels were prepared to meet Australia s stringent environmental and quarantine requirements. KEY ASSETS INVOLVED: m/v Mighty Servant 3 m/v Forte m/v Fjell m/v Fjord 35
CONCLUSIONS LOGISTICAL MANAGEMENT Single interface management partner Heavy transportation vessels Tug and barge Dock type ships Self geared ships Complete project management solution Grillage & sea-fastening design, fabrication and installation Engineering studies Management of risk Partnering with SPMT providers, freight forwarding, civil engineering Scope outside of transportation MOF design and construction Land reclamation Dredging Environmental monitoring Offshore installation 44
NEW HORIZONS THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION! 45