Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act (MAP-21) And Beyond

Similar documents
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century MAP-21

Federal-aid 101 A Financial Overview. Mark Newland FHWA, Financial Manager Purdue Road School, 2014

AASHTO Summary and Analysis of the Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy (DRIVE) Act August 28, 2015

P.L Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

Introduction. Performance Measurement. Pg. 01

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS THE FIXING AMERICA S SURFACE TRANSPORTATION (FAST) ACT SUMMARY HR th CONGRESS

Updated Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

LTAP News. On July 6, 2012, President Obama INSIDE. MAP-21 and California Implementation SPRING 2013

Coalition for America s Gateways and Trade Corridors

MAP-21 DIVISION A FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS AND HIGHWAY SAFETY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS

Overview of Changes Made to CMAQ & System Performance Measures. Presented by: Jason Pavluchuk Association for Commuter Transportation

IDOT PERFORMANCE BASED PROJECT METRICS. February 2018

AICP EXAM REVIEW. Transportation Planning. February 19, 2016

Addendum 1: Performance Measures

MAP 21 Freight Provisions and Seaports

MAP-21 themes. Strengthens America s highway and public transportation systems. Creates jobs and supports economic growth

Multi-modal Plan Aviation Plan Highway Investment Plan. Implications of Vision Funding Outlook. Collaboration

POLICY RESOLUTIONS

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

Freight Provisions in the FAST ACT

MOBILITY 2045: A FOCUS ON TRANSPORTATION CHOICE:

RESOLUTION NO

PERFORMANCE BASED PLANNING

6 CHARTING PERFORMANCE

MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress Title in the 21 st Century Subtitle

NORTHERN VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

Creating Safe, Sustainable, Multi-Modal Urban Transportation

PERSPECTIVES ON THE FAST ACT

Regional Transportation Performance Measures

INTEGRATED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Relationship to 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) - Goals and Performance Measures

SBCAG STAFF REPORT. MAP-21/FAST Act Performance Measures and Targets. MEETING DATE: September 20, 2018 AGENDA ITEM: 4H

Addendum #3 to the Regional Transportation Plan

connections 2040 the waco metropolitan transportation plan

Legislating Geotechnical Asset Management: Lessons Learned

Multimodal Freight Transportation Policy Overview

Transportation Funding in the San Diego Region

Joint House and Senate Transportation Committee Update to the Ten Year Plan

New Jersey Department of Transportation. Local Freight Impact Fund Handbook. Procedures and Criteria for Local Freight Impact Fund Grant Program

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

Surface Transportation Policy Recommendations. For the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission

National Updates & Discussion: MAP-21

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

TTAC STAFF REPORT. State Targets for the MAP-21/FAST Act National Highway Performance Program. MEETING DATE: August 2, 2018 AGENDA ITEM: 5

CHAPTER 2. VISION, GOALS AND MTP FRAMEWORK

FAST Act House and Senate Freight Provisions

Who Does What. Susan Handy TTP282 October 2017

MPO Glossary & Acronyms

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

FHWA TPM Framework and Capability Maturity Model (CMM)

2/15/2018. Metropolitan and Statewide Transportation Planning Requirements. Austin, Texas February 15, PART 1 Background

White Paper Compilation Part 2: Modal Councils and Special Committee on Freight DRAFT February 19, 2019

Speed Up the Delivery of Transportation Projects

Metropolitan Planning Organization Safety Performance Measures Fact Sheet

Safety Performance Management Targets. Transportation Policy Board January 11, 2018

2. Guiding Principles, Objectives, and Policies

Transportation Spending and Job Creation. February 2011

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

Roads, rails, and beyond: Implications and opportunities for metropolitan America

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING EDITION

CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE SOURCES OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

Funding Sources for Today:

Arizona Association of County Engineers New Rules for Categorical Exclusions for FHWA Projects

Framework for ADOT Asset Management System. Jean A. Nehme, PhD, PE Arizona Department of Transportation

Freight Public Private Partnerships Today. by Bill Habig, P.E., AICP Transportation Matters

Federal Transit Administration. Planning Information Exchange June 13, 2014

Going Forward The Plan to Maintain & Improve Mobility Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Summary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans

20-Year State Highway Investment Plan. Appendix C ACRONYMS AND GLOSSARY APPENDIX C ACRONYMS AND GLOSSARY PAGE C-1

AASHTO Policy Papers Topic IX: Freight

PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT

Implementation of Transportation Performance Management Title Program Subtitle

FHWA Programs Supporting Freight

Mobility and System Reliability Goal

Jay Hansen Executive Vice President National Asphalt Pavement Association

Data Driven Results: North Carolina s Strategic Prioritization Process through SPOT On!ine. NCDOT Strategic Prioritization Office April 4, 2016

U.S. Chamber of Commerce Recommendations to Congress Regarding SAFETEA-LU Reauthorization

Project Delivery Process. Bruce Johnson, P.E. State Bridge Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation

Appendix E-1. FDOT MPO Program Management Handbook. (Excerpts)

Maintenance, Construction & Secondary Roads. Terry Gibson, PE Chief Engineer February 20, 2013

Transportation Improvement Program NOVEMBER, 2018

BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BOARD

AREAWIDE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AND REHABILITATION

Acronyms. AACOG Alamo Area Council of Governments. AAMPO Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization

Navajo Nation. Thursday September 22, :30 pm 3:15 pm. Arizona Department of Transportation Planning and Funding Processes

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Process and Federal Agency Compliance

PURPOSE OF THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP)

2017 TRANSPORTATION POLICY STATEMENT

TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

ADDENDUM 1: PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Freight and Rail Stakeholder Webinar. January 7, 2014

Designing the Future of NMDOT

INVESTMENT SCENARIOS CHAPTER Illustrative Investment Approaches Public Outreach 6-1

Regional Performance Measures Annual Progress Report TPO Board - 2/4/2016 Presentation by: Chris Wichman, Senior Planner

Chapter 10 Goals, Objectives + Policies

Sierra Club Transportation Reform POLICY GUIDE

EIGHT PLANNING FACTORS

ITS Heartland 2013 Annual Meeting March 25-27, 2013 // Topeka, Kansas. Thomas E. Kern Executive Vice President, ITS America

Integrating Land Use, Transportation and Pricing Policy

Transcription:

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act (MAP-21) And Beyond Janet Oakley Director of Director of American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials

MAP-21Key highlights Funding Program Reforms program consolidation, performance and accountability, project delivery Historic Preservation Funding and Collaboration Opportunities The Future for the Federal-Aid Surface Transportation Program

America responds to Surface Transportation needs Strong bipartisan support for passage in Congress House 372-52; Senate 74-19 Program Reforms Funding Program consolidation Performance and Accountability Accelerating Project Delivery

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)

Funding authorization = $105 billion for FY 2013 and FY 2014 Extends the HTF and tax collections through FY 2016 Guarantees 95% return to the States on Highway Trust Fund contributions More than 92% of the highway title is apportioned to core highway programs Maintains transit-highway program split

Billions of dollars Highways Research Safety Transit Total FFY 2013 40.568 0.400 1.231 10.578 52.777 FFY 2014 40.625 0.400 1.252 10.695 52.972 Total 81.193 0.800 2.483 21.273 105.749 6

HIGHWAY FORMULA PROGRAM Source: Transportation Weekly

MAP 21 Selected Highway Program Authorizations FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2013 $ FY 2014 $ 2-year Total $ Federal-Aid Highway Core Programs 37, 476,819,674 37,798,000,000 75,274,819,674 National Highway Performance Program 21, 751,779,050 21,935,691,598 43,687,470,648 Surface Transportation Program 10,005,135,419 10,089,729,416 20,094,864,835 Highway Safety Improvement Program 2,390,305,390 2,410,515,560 4,800,820,950 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality 2,209,172,618 2,227,860,477 4,437,033,095 Metropolitan Planning 311,667,197 314,302,948 625,970,145 Transportation Alternative 808,760,000 819,900,000 1,628,660,000 TIFIA 750,000,000 1,000,000,000 1,750,000,000 Projects of National and Regional Significance 500,000,000 0 500,000,000 (GF Authorization) Research 400,000,000 400,000,000 800,000,000 TOTAL Highway Program Funding 40,968,000,000 41,025,000,000 81,993,000,000 Authorizations TOTAL Highway Program Obligation Limitation 39,699,000,000 40,256,000,000 79,955,000,000

MAP 21 Selected Transit Program Authorizations FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2013 $ FY 2014 $ 2-year Total $ Transit Formula and Bus Grants 8,478,000,000 8,595,000,000 17,073,000,000 Planning program 126,900,000 128,800,000 255,700,000 Metropolitan Planning 10,000,000 10,000,000 20,000,000 Urbanized Area Formula Grants 4,397,950,000 4,458,650,000 8,856,600,000 Elderly and Disabled Formula Grants 254,800,000 258,300,000 513,100,000 Rural Area Formula Grants 599,500,000 607,800,000 1,207,300,000 Bus Testing Facility 3,000,000 3,000,000 6,000,000 National Transit Institute 5,000,000 5,000,000 10,000,000 National Transit Database 3,850,000 3,850,000 7,700,000 State of Good Repair Formula Grants 2,136,300,000 2,165,900,000 4,302,200,000 Buses and Bus Facilities 422,000,000 427,800,000 849,800,000 Fast Growth/High Density Formula Grants 518,700,000 525,900,000 1,044,600,000 Capital Investment Grants (GF 1,907,000,000 1,907,000,000 3,814,000,000 Authorization) TOTAL Transit Funding Authorizations 10,584,000,000 10,701,000,000 21,285,000,000

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)

Consolidates more than100 categorical programs by two-thirds Creates two new core programs through consolidation National Highway Performance Program Transportation Alternatives Focuses new attention on freight National freight policy and goals National freight plan National freight network Consolidates and formularizes transit programs

Combines the TE, Safe Routes, Rec Trails and Scenic Byways 2% set aside of the core highway programs SAFETEA LU average annual funding for TE, Safe Routes to School and Rec Trails = $854 million MAP 21 average annual funding for TAP = $814 million 50% of TA funds are suballocated based on relative share of population to MPOs > 200,000 and other areas < population Funds distributed through competitive grants State DOTs are not eligible recipients

Historic preservation, rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, structures and facilities Archaeological activities related to transportation projects

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)

Seven national goal areas safety, infrastructure condition, congestion, system reliability, freight movement and economic vitality, environmental sustainability, reduced project delays USDOT will establish measures in consultation with State DOTs, MPOs and other stakeholder States, MPO and transit operators will set targets for each measure, incorporate in plans and programs and report progress

NHS Measures for pavement condition and performance of the IS and NHS Measures for NHS bridge condition Minimum Levels for IS pavement condition Highway safety - Serious Injuries and Fatalities CMAQ - Traffic Congestion and Mobile Source Emissions Freight - Measures to assess freight movement on the IS Transit Safety and State of Good Repair Measures

Performance measures must be incorporated into long-range planning and short-term programming processes. Long range plans, TIPs and STIPs must show the progress that is expected to be achieved by planned decisions and investments USDOT will evaluate the appropriateness of state targets and the progress that the state is making in achieving performance targets. States and MPO plans will include performance reports that described the progress made toward achieving performance targets.

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)

Expanded flexibility to undertake activities prior to completion of NEPA New categorical exclusions for emergency projects, projects within the ROW, small projects and certain multimodal projects Expanded delegation Support for Programmatic Approaches Further Process Reforms issue elevation, resource agency deadlines, 150 day statute of limitations, combined FEIS and ROD

Transportation provides the largest single source of funding to support historic preservation efforts. State-only transportation programs and funding Federal Planning and Research Programs State Planning & Research Funds NCHRP Funding 8-36 Standing Committee on Planning 25-25 Standing Committee on Environment Transportation Alternatives Program National Highway Performance Program

Pedestrian Streetscapes $658,000,000 / 6.3% Billboard Removal $40,000,000 / 0.4% Landscaping and Scenic Beautification $1,281,000,000 / 12.3% Env. Mitigation $120,000,000 / 1.2% Rail-Trails $720,000,000 / 6.9% Bike/Ped Facilities $5,231,000,000 / 50.4% Transportation Museums $153,000,000 / 1.5% Archaeological Planning/research $53,000,000 / 0.5% Scenic/Historical Highway Programs $570,000,000 / 5.5% Rehab. Hist. Transp. Facilities $931,000,000 / 9.0% Historic Preservation $365,000,000 / 3.5% Bike/Ped Safety Ed. $36,000,000 / 0.3% Acquisition of Scenic/Historic Easements $223,000,000 / 2.1%

Funding Level SAFETEA LU average annual funding for TE, Safe Routes to School and Rec Trails = $854 million MAP 21 average annual funding for TAP = $814 million Changes to eligibility including the ability to fund certain road projects Archaeological activities limited to use in conjunction with projects not planning and research States ability to transfer funds from the program

Restoration & Rehab. 18% Relocation 1% Reconstruction 49% New Route 11% Resurfacing 27%

California and Ohio Planning and Databases Indiana Historic Bridges Programmatic Agreement Minnesota and North Carolina - Archaeological Predictive Models Oregon Collaborative Environmental and Transportation Agreement for Streamlining * NCHRP 25-25 Report by SRI Foundation for Cambridge Systematics, Inc. and TRB on behalf of the AASHTO Standing Committee on Environment

Leadership Interagency Cooperation and Collaboration Funding Technology Organizational changes Spin-Offs *NCHRP 25-25 Report by SRI Foundation for Cambridge Systematics, Inc. and TRB on behalf of the AASHTO Standing Committee on Environment

HIGHWAY TRUST FUND PROJECTIONS Based on CBO Score of MAP-21 (June 2012) Highway Account Fiscal Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beginning-of-year Balance $14 $8 $4 $4 -$6 -$15 -$24 -$33 -$42 -$52 -$62 Revenues and Interest $33 $33 $33 $34 $35 $36 $36 $36 $36 $37 $37 Intragovernmental Transfers $2 $6 $10 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Outlays $42 $43 $44 $44 $44 $45 $45 $46 $46 $47 $47 End-of-year Balance $8 $4 $4 -$6 -$15 -$24 -$33 -$42 -$52 -$62 -$72 Mass Transit Account Fiscal Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beginning-of-year Balance $7 $5 $5 $1 -$3 -$7 -$12 -$16 -$20 -$24 -$29 Revenues and Interest $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 Intragovernmental Transfers $0 $0 $2 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Outlays $7 $8 $8 $9 $10 $10 $10 $9 $9 $10 $10 End-of-year Balance $5 $5 $1 -$3 -$7 -$12 -$16 -$20 -$24 -$29 -$33 TOTAL HTF BALANCE $13 $9 $5 -$9 -$22 -$36 -$49 -$62 -$76 -$91 -$105

($ billions) 45 40 35 Estimation of Federal Highway and Transit Obligations Through 2022 $40.7 $41.2 $40.8 Based on MAP-21; Assuming "minimum prudent balance" of $4 billion in Highway Account and $1 billion in Mass Transit Account; Assumes historical General Fund appropriations for transit. Federal-aid Highway Highway Safety Transit $38.9 $39.4 $40.0 $34.7 $35.4 $36.1 $36.8 $37.5 $38.3 $39.1 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 $11.9 $11.3 $11.6 $11.7 $11.8 $9.4 $4.2 $8.6 $9.2 $9.3 $9.5 $9.6 $1.3 $6.3 $6.4 $3.5 $1.3 $1.3 $1.3 $1.2 $1.2 $1.3 $1.3 $1.3 $1.3 $1.4 $1.4 $1.4 $1.4 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

The gas tax has served us well! The gas tax is declining due to VMT flattening and economic issues as well as fuel efficiency In the short run we will need to rely on gas tax Subsets such as indexing have value but are limited Many options but most have shortcomings

Two-year bill with a reform platform national focus, program consolidation, performance and accountability, streamlined project delivery Remain at a stand-off on future federal funding, roles and responsibilities States and their local partners are moving forward to meet passenger and freight mobility needs but as a nation we are still falling behind Continued opportunities for collaboration

Janet Oakley AASHTO Director of Policy & Government Relations joakley@aashto.org (202)624-3698