The Hydrogen Energy California (HECA) Project

Similar documents
california CCS coalition Created to represent CCS industry to ensure CCS is part of state s carbon stabilization program. Bring voices to the table th

Carson Hydrogen Power

Carson Hydrogen Power

Hydrogen Energy California Low Carbon Solutions for California

FutureGen The Right Project at the Right Time

Case Study Development Experience with the Mesaba Energy Project: Permitting and Environmental Review

WITH CO2 SEQUESTRATION

Helping Pay For CO 2 Capture Projects Through Geological Sequestration of CO 2 Used for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR)

Utility Perspective on CO 2 Sequestration

EPRI Advanced Coal with CCS Industry Technology Demonstration Projects

Carbon Capture & Sequestration in the California Context

Pre-Commercial Demonstration of High Efficiency, Low Cost Syngas Cleanup Technology for Chemical, Fuel, and Power Applications

CCEP Overview. January Unlocking CCS in the UK

New Recovery Act Funding Boosts Industrial Carbon Capture and Storage Research and Development

Office of Clean Coal and Carbon Management

GE Energy. IGCC vs. Carbon

Sweeny Gasification Project February 8, 2010

Pre-Combustion Technology for Coal-fired Power Plants

Update on the FutureGen Project Pathway Towards Zero Emissions

THE WABASH RIVER IGCC PROJECT REPOWERING COAL FIRED POWER PLANTS

GE Energy. IGCC s Role in Advancing

THE DEVELOPMENT OF A VERSATILE IGCC TO MEET THE UK MARKET

Projects on 3 continents

Duke Energy s Edwardsport IGCC Plant: Concept to Commercial

11 th Annual CO 2 EOR Carbon Management Workshop

RTI Warm Syngas Cleanup Technology Demonstration

Syntroleum Coal to Liquids Integrating Gasification, Fischer-Tropsch and Refining Technology. CTL Forum, Beijing China June 15-16, 2006

ConocoPhillips Gasification Outlook. Gasification Technology and IGCC Programs & Progress

RTI/Eastman Warm Syngas Clean-up Technology: Integration with Carbon Capture

Canadian Clean Power Coalition: Clean Coal-Fired Power Plant Technology To Address Climate Change Concerns

Advanced Hydrogen and CO 2 Capture Technology for Sour Syngas

Request for Proposal Technical Conference: Oregon Meeting (Following Utah Docket

GE Energy. Advancements in Gasification Technology Allan Connolly, General Manager of Gasification Technology October 12, 2005

The Cost of Mercury Removal in an IGCC Plant

Future Gen An Interested Party s Perspective

PRECOMBUSTION TECHNOLOGY for Coal Fired Power Plant

A Grid in Transition: A look at Power Systems Regulations. Jordan Kislear, DOE Fossil Energy. Florida Energy Systems Consortia, May 21, 2015

Enabling a Brighter Tomorrow: E-Gas TM Gasification

Advanced Coal Technology 101

GreatPoint Energy International Advanced Coal Technologies Conference June 2010

CO 2 Capture: Impacts on IGCC Plant Performance in a High Elevation Application using Western Sub-Bituminous Coal

Rectisol Wash Units Acid Gas Removal for Polygeneration Concepts downstream Gasification

California Biomass Collaborative

Transforming American Industry through Alternative Materials. MARK COSTA Senior Vice President Corporate Strategy and Marketing

Gasification Combined Cycles 101. Dr. Jeff Phillips EPRI

Focus on Gasification in the Western U.S.

Carbon Capture and Storage: A Technology Solution for Continued Coal Use in a Carbon Constrained World

Future of Coal in America Update on CO 2 Capture & Storage Project at AEP s Mountaineer Plant

Lurgi s MPG Gasification plus Rectisol Gas Purification Advanced Process Combination for Reliable Syngas Production

American Electric Power s

Mr. Daniel has authored a gasification patent and represents GE on the Gasification Technologies Council.

EPA FACT SHEET: Reducing Carbon Pollution From Power Plants Details About the Proposal for New Sources

Repowering Conventional Coal Plants with Texaco Gasification: The Environmental and Economic Solution

Petroleum Coke Gasification Sweeny E-GasE. Gas Project

Status of Coal Utilization and Its Future Direction: A US Perspective

Gasification: A Key Technology Platform for Western Canada s Coal and Oil Sands Industries

FutureGen 2.0 Update

Syngas Cleanup. wdp - warm desulfurization process. gas cleanup option.

GHGT 13, 11th November 2016 Lausanne, Switzerland. Kemper County Energy Facility

An Economic Development Plan for Southern Louisiana. Non-Conventional Energy: 3 Opportunities

UPDATE ON THE KEMPER COUNTY IGCC PROJECT Gasification Technologies Conference

4.0 Emissions Inventory

Climate Neutral Combustion Technology. Discussion Topics

Reducing CO 2 Emission by Hydrogen IGCC Power Plants. Hydrogen IGCC

Towards 2 nd generation of IGCC plants Nuon Magnum multi-fuel power plant Robert de Kler, May 2009

Whiting Business Unit

Air Products Proposed Renewable Energy Facility in Tees Valley 28 th February

An Update On Shell Licensed Gasification Projects and the Performance of Pernis IGCC

China CCUS Developments and Perspective

Electricity Committee. Subcommittee on Clean Coal and Carbon Management

Ronald L. Schoff Parsons Corporation George Booras Electric Power Research Institute

The Cost of CO 2 Capture and Storage

Company Brochure 2012

Analysis of flexibility options for electricity generating projects with pre-combustion capture of CO 2

CSLF Technical Working Group Nov. 5 th, 2013, Washington DC. Dr. S. Julio Friedmann Deputy Assistant Secretary Office of Clean Coal November 2013

Gasification Project Development Progress and Challenges William Rosenberg

Technical and Economic Evaluation of a 70 MWe Biomass IGCC Using Emery Energy s Gasification Technology

Advanced Coal Technologies for Power Generation

Evaluation of Hydrogen Production at Refineries in China. The new UOP SeparALL TM Process. Bart Beuckels, UOP NV

NOx CONTROL FOR IGCC FACILITIES STEAM vs. NITROGEN

Gasification & Water Nexus

Eltron Research & Development

Advanced Integrated Dual-Oxidant CFB Power Plant with CCS Oxy-Coal CFB

Refined Energy Holdings. Power County Advanced Energy Center: Project Summary and CO2 Discussion

Session 6 Gas Turbine Emissions and Regulatory Developments

Production of Electric Power and Chemicals in a Carbon Constrained Environment

Wyoming Infrastructure Authority Rocky Mountain Land Use Conference University of Denver Campus March 13-14, 2014

OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE AND CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS.

Does California Need Carbon Capture & Sequestration?

IMPLEMENTING CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY THROUGH GASIFICATION AND LIQUEFACTION THE INDIAN PERSPECTIVE

18th Annual North American Waste-to-Energy Conference A LEADING PROVIDER OF CLEAN ENERGY SOLUTIONS

Co-Production of Fuel Alcohols & Electricity via Refinery Coke Gasification Ravi Ravikumar & Paul Shepard

Illinois Basin Decatur Project & ADM Industrial CCS Demonstration

The Global Context for Low Emission Coal Technologies

CO Capture Project. Key Findings. Cliff Lowe ChevronTexaco Energy Technology Company. April 27, 2004 GCEP Workshop.

CITGO Lake Charles IGCC Project Update Presented at the Gasification Technologies Council Annual Conference October 2001

Waste Minimization Branch U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste

CCUS Major Demonstrations Program Overview

IGCC FUJIAN PROJECT. Dario Camozzi - Snamprogetti, Italy Andrea Baldelli - Snamprogetti, Italy Sun Hong Sinopec Ningbo Engineering Company, China

Flexible Integration of the sco 2 Allam Cycle with Coal Gasification for Low-Cost, Emission-Free Electricity Generation

Transcription:

The Hydrogen Energy California (HECA) Project N Maha Mahasenan Principal Advisor International Advanced Coal Conference Laramie, WY June 23, 2010 1

Presentation Outline (1) Introduction to the Project - Policy context - Project features - Project goals (2) Positioning the Project for Success - Site selection - Recent developments - Schedule (3) Design Considerations - Technology advancements and design philosophy - Environmental excellence 2

California must dramatically decarbonize all sectors to meet its aggressive 2050 GHG reduction goals Study conducted by E3, Inc. California must: Dramatically improve energy efficiency in all sectors Switch energy use to electricity everywhere possible, including transportation Decarbonize the electricity sector using three approaches in combination: Renewable energy Nuclear power CCS Available from www.ethree.com 3

A Balanced Approach to CO 2 Mitigation is Necessary Meeting California s Long-Term Greenhouse Gas Reduction Goals, E3 4

A blended, diversified approach reduces the risks of any particular technology We re eventually going to see need to employ CCS on a large scale in California if we are going to be able to meet the 2050 goals of AB32. -President Michael Peevey, California PUC, Feb 20, 2009 5

location Elk Hills Bakersfield IGCC with fully integrated CO 2 capture based on GE Quench Gasification and GE 7F Syngas turbine technologies Located in Kern County, California (west of Bakersfield), in close proximity to water, gas and transmission infrastructure Adjacent to Occidental Elk Hills Field and CO 2 injection point for EOR & sequestration Proximity to feedstock transloading (western coal and petcoke from refineries) Low population density 6

HECA visual rendering Looking northwest 7

design basis power block ASU Air Products air air separation N 2 hydrogen turbine generator heat recovery steam generator SCR/CO catalyst steam steam turbine generator 250 MW net electric power petcoke & coal O 2 H 2 gasification block fluxant raw water gasifier H 2 CO CO 2 H 2 O H 2 S shift reactors and gas cooling H 2 CO 2 H 2 S carbon dioxide capture sulfur removal CO 2 CO 2 compression 90% c-capture CO 2 transport CO 2 sequestration H 2 S sulfur conversion S liquid sulfur gasifier solids 8

Hydrogen Energy California Project Goals Generate low carbon base-load power to meet California s increasing power demand and GHG policy goals Produce hydrogen, a clean burning fuel that will be used to generate 250+ MW net of electricity 90% CO 2 capture: ~2 million tons for enhanced oil recovery and sequestration in nearby oil fields Operate with feedstock flexibility by utilizing a range of feedstocks from petroleum coke to western bituminous coal Preserve limited fresh water by utilizing 100% brackish water for plant needs, and Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) 9

HECA- Siting for success Siting CCS Projects more complicated than traditional power projects less than 5 miles away from Elk Hills reservoirs project linears (transmission, natural gas, water, solids disposal) are under 10 miles 10

HECA CO 2 Sink: Elk Hills Formation Over 1 billion tons of CO 2 storage capacity available in CA oilfields Elk Hills Reservoirs met all of the screening criteria Part of Strategic Petroleum Reserve from 1912 to 1998 Clear ownership history and site / well documentation multiple potential storage horizons, each with shale seals OXY of Elk Hills is the CO 2 recipient Pilot tests for CO 2 -EOR successful 11

HECA Project Progress Federal funding: $308M DOE Clean Coal Power Initiative- Round 3 Selected for negotiations July 2009, based on January 2009 application Cooperative Agreement signed with DOE September 2009 Cost share has begun State Funding: PUC Decision on SCE s $30M funding request Approved by 5-0 commissioners vote in February 2009 SCE Rate Recovery approved December 2009 Engineering Progress: Signed GE License Agreement, completed Process Design Package Selected AGR and SRU vendors Open solicitations : ASU and MAC (Main Automation Contractor) 12

HECA: Permitting Progress Application for Certification (AFC) with CEC May 2009: submitted Application For Certification Aug 2009: data adequacy achieved Sept 2009: Information hearing and HECA site visit completed Dec 2009: HECA and Oxy site visit with CA regulators, U.S. EPA and U.S. Senate staff Over 150 data requests addressed Preliminary Staff Assessment (Part 1) expected in mid-2010 NEPA Review Public scoping meeting held on April 14, 2010 in Bakersfield, CA CEC is Cooperating Agency for NEPA Process 13

HECA Stakeholder Outreach Governor s Office CA Public Utilities Commission* California Energy Commission* CA Dept Of Conservation/DOGGR* EPA Region IX* US Fish & Wildlife* Cal EPA & Air Resources Board* SJV Air Pollution Control District* Regional Water Quality Control Board* State Legislative Representatives CA Congressional Delegation National Environmental Organizations Kern County Board Of Supervisors Local Labor, Trade Organizations Local Community Leaders Local Environmental Organizations Area Business Associations Area Homeowners Associations Fish and Game* *agencies with HECA permitting input permitting a new plant site, CO 2 pipeline and CO 2 sequestration site 14

Hydrogen Energy California Technology Advancements Exhibit commercial IGCC - CCS with Western coals and petcoke Captures 90% of carbon as CO 2 during steady state operation: >90% CO2 capture efficiency >2 million tons of CO 2 per year captured for EOR and sequestration Use of Rectisol technology in a solid-feed IGCC Use of high-hydrogen fueled F-class gas turbine Sulfur-emissions-free start-up and shutdown of an IGCC based on GE gasification technology, with minimal flaring 15

Hydrogen Energy California Technology Readiness Two Project objectives guide technology selection: Prove commercial scale IGCC-CCS operability at high capture rates and low criteria emissions over lifetime of operation Deliver a high reliability operating plant within a minimum period after initial startup Strategic approach: Select proven technology where available to minimize risk in component parts Use of GE quench gasification technology o Most proven solid fuel gasifier available, low technical risk o Advantageous for shift reaction and high % CO2 capture Rectisol has multiple operating units at similar scale to target H2S levels Comprehensive GE 7F syngas turbine testing program 16

HECA- Environmental Performance HECA will meet strict state and local air quality standards State of the art emission controls to achieve BACT emissions for IGCC SCR for NOx control; Rectisol for deep sulfur removal Minimize flaring and avoid sour syngas flaring + sulfur emissions-free startup technology licensed from Eastman Pollutant Technology employed Emission Limit NOx Diluent Injection, Selective Catalytic Reduction 4 ppm NOx @ 15% O 2 CO Good Combustion Practice (GCP), CO Catalyst 3 ppm CO @ 15% O 2 PM 10 GCP, Gas Cleanup in AGR 20 lb/hr SO 2 Gas cleanup in AGR 5 ppmv total sulfur VOC CO Catalyst 1 ppm VOC @ 15% O 2 NH 3 Selective Catalytic Reduction 5 ppm NH 3 slip 17

HECA- Industry/State/Federal Partnership Summary of Benefits Demonstrates commercial operation of 250 MW IGCC with 90% CO 2 capture, eliminating ~2 million tons of GHG emissions annually Reduces the pressure and need for natural gas with in-state, low-carbon baseload power Increases energy security by boosting production from California s own oilfields Received CCS support in stimulus bill (CCPI-3 award from US DOE) HECA would provide a stimulus to Kern County, creating over 1500 construction jobs and over 100 permanent jobs (We) became increasingly convinced of the value of the HECA Project, and its environmental benefits to California it really is a win-win-win-win-win. President Michael Peevey, California PUC, Feb 20 2009 18

www.hydrogenenergycalifornia.com 19