HIGHLIGHT OF THE UC SAN DIEGO 2015 STAFF ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

Similar documents
Summary Category Scores vs. Benchmark UC OVERALL [W] (N=8,096) vs. TOWERS WATSON U.S. NATIONAL NORM (N=160,605)

2015 Staff Engagement Survey Results

2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey. Riverside

2017 ALL STAFF TOWN HALL. Welcome. Questions?

2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey. San Diego

TOWN HALL- ADMIN SERVICES

University of Kentucky 2017 Engagement Survey. Human Resources Overall

2017 Engagement Survey. Results Overview

University of Kentucky 2017 Engagement Survey. College of Ag, Food and Environment Overall

Summary of Results DESIGN, COLLEGE OF. Staff Results. January 2014

Summary of Results DESIGN, COLLEGE OF. Faculty Results January 2014

20% 19% 9% 11% 8% 4% 4% 5% Satisfaction with UC San Diego. Satisfaction Mean Scores by Question Dimension

28% 17% Satisfaction Mean Scores by Question Dimension

Coconino Community College Employee Opinion Survey

Feedback report. Employee effectiveness

2012 UC CUCSA Staff Engagement Survey Career Development Workgroup Update. Staff Assembly Brown Bag October 29, 2013

Employee Engagement Survey Results

SampleCo Organization Survey Results

2010 Employee Survey Results. May 2010

1/26/2012 TOPICS 2011 SAN MATEO COUNTY EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY SURVEY BACKGROUND SURVEY BACKGROUND

Analyzing Employee Survey Data. Task Force on Race and Race Relations February 2016

House of Commons / PICT 2008 Staff Survey. Results Key Findings

Sample Company. New Hire Survey Report. Prepared For: Current Survey Period: Month Year Month Year New Hires (Surveys Completed Month - Month Year)

Talent Management and Rewards Survey. U.S. Report

Performance Management Workgroup Report. Ingrid Fahr, Irvine Janna Le Blanc, Riverside Karla Wood, UC Office of the President

EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY VOICE OF EMPLOYEE - ANALYSIS & RESULTS. SpiceJet Employee Satisfaction Survey

Employee Engagement Survey Report Guide 2018

Staff Survey september - october 2016 results. Voice Project

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

Leaders and Engagement

Succession Planning. Dan Rochon, CPA, CA Helping First Nations Succeed

GUIDE TO EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

EMPLOYMENT LIFE CYCLE

Results of the Employee Engagement Survey, October 2015

August 4, 2010 Information Requests Round 1

Very. dissatisfied. Somewhat. dissatisfied 11% Somewhat. satisfied 42%

Compensation & Motivation. October 6, 2014

GUIDE TO COMPLETING YOUR CAREER DEVELOPMENT PLAN

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT. Administrative Office Circuit Court of Lake County, Illinois 2014 Court Employee Engagement Survey. Employee Growth & Development

Building a Culture of Employee Engagement in Government

Employee Engagement Leadership Workshop

Why Does Employee Engagement Matter?

This report was obtained (via FOIA) and posted by AltGov2.

Driving a Culture of Continuous Improvement- Part 2

Engagement Survey. Table of Contents

DTR72KXREB7/TGDTRN24PERe. Sample Organization Sample Organization

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

2016 EMPLOYEE SURVEY RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

Employee Engagement: Are We Engaged or Just Going Steady?

COLLEGE EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS Laramie County Community College - Spring 2016 Respondents. Mean

DTR9274O1HJ/TGDTRm5Xgw33Z. Department Survey Sample Department

Leadership Agility Profile: 360 Assessment. Prepared for J. SAMPLE DATE

Group Profile. Sample Group

FP&M Divisional EID Survey: Summary Results

Supervision Policy. Safeguarding in Education

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

Leadership Training Calendar September June 2017

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

Info-Tech Research Group

WHITEPAPER. Sirota Dynamic Alignment Model Competency Alignment

Employee Performance Log

Sustainable biosafety and and laboratory capacity building for resource-constrained settings what do we mean?

CEB HR Employee Engagement. CARE (Dec 2014)

School Bus Driver and Assistants Job Satisfaction Survey Report

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

OUR PEOPLE, OUR STRENGTH

FMEP: Facilities Management Evaluation Program

Out & Equal - Leadership Day Diagnosing and Optimizing Inclusion for LGBT Employees

High Performing Workplace Index

William & Mary 2015 Employee Climate Survey

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

Employee Survey Presentation of Results to Staff November 2016 Opinion Research Services Darren Ivey, Senior Research Executive

GAAR Multinet Gas Network Expenditure to 2022

My supervisor gives me ongoing feedback to help me improve performance I know how my department measures success.

OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES. William & Mary Employee Climate Survey Final Report and Recommendations to the President February 22, 2016

TALENT RETENTION Hanging on to High Performers:

The Advancing Women Organizational Assessment Feedback Results. WILOA Test Aggregate. May 2017

Best Places to Work for YOU Survey Results

Performance Evaluation Form: Goal Setting - Performance Management - Performance Feedback

CREATING A POSITIVE WORKPLACE BY SUPPORTING STAFF ENGAGEMENT. Ellie Boughton & Louise Parkes

Coaching Guide Jan 22,

MANAGER PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT INSTRUMENT

Building a Culture of Employee Engagement in Government

2018 TPA Conference. Practical Lessons from "Best Places to Work" April 16, 2018

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

Employee Well-Being and Satisfaction Survey Results 2015

towerswatson.com The Power of People EDF Energy drives employee engagement and high performance

Performance Skills Leader. Individual Feedback Report

Staff Advisory Council Presentation to President s Advisory Council May 15, 2012

High Performing Workplace Index

BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION DECEMBER BCFP Annual Employee Survey Results

Capitalizing on Effective Communication

Nonfaculty Performance Evaluation (blank form for draft work)

Jeffco Public Schools

Workforce Development Strategy

Overview of Reports Survey Results

How to Retain Top Talent: Moving the Needle on Employee Engagement. Employee Insights

Transcription:

HIGHLIGHT OF THE UC SAN DIEGO 2015 STAFF ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

AGENDA CUCSA Staff Engagement Survey Background IS Engagement Important? 2012 Staff Engagement Survey Outcomes 2015 Staff Engagement Survey Results Our areas of strength Our focus for improvement Get Involved!

BACKGROUND FOR THE SURVEY Non-represented staff system-wide survey was created at the request of CUCSA Survey was conducted by Towers Watson for UCOP and CUCSA Sample consisted of non-represented (policy covered) staff Conducted between March 30 April 24, 2015 Response rate for UC System 46% (range 40% - 56%) Response rate for UC San Diego 45% (n = 1,096/2,440)

WHY IS ENGAGEMENT IMPORTANT? Employees benefits: Growth Opportunities (learning and advancement) Campus Climate Relationships (cooperative and collaborative) Employer benefits: Productivity Innovation Commitment

SOME GOOD NEWS In each of the following categories our performance is above average when benchmarked against UC Overall. Our biggest differences were in the following three areas: Category Favorable Responses Image/Brand 80% +4 Career Development 60% +4 Organizational Change 37% +4 Difference from UC Overall

IMAGE/BRAND

Image/Brand Items vs. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959) Category 4: Image/Brand 4. My campus/location is highly regarded by its employees. Total Favorable? Total Unfavorable Total Favorable Differences From Benchmark A 74.50457228 13.75961206 11.73581543 14 12 B 65.16264534 65* 14.90031433 19.93704081 15 20* 9 * 9 0 25 50 75 100 * indicates a statistically significant difference -30-20 -10 0 10 20 30 Red / Green Difference Bars are statistically significant A. B. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959)

Image/Brand Items vs. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959) Category 4: Image/Brand 30. I am proud to be associated with the UC system. Total Favorable? Total Unfavorable A 86.22334808 8.485118453 86 5.291532423 8 5 B 0 25 50 75 100 * indicates a statistically significant difference This question was added to the 2015 survey A. B. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959)

CAREER DEVELOPMENT

Career Development Items vs. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959) Category 1: Career Development 1. I believe I have the opportunity for personal development and growth within the UC system. Total Favorable? Total Unfavorable Total Favorable Differences From Benchmark A 72.80082 8.581711818 73 18.61746923 9 19 B 74.08568573 6.687565327 74 19.22675037 7 19-1 -1 0 25 50 75 100 * indicates a statistically significant difference -30-20 -10 0 10 20 30 Red / Green Difference Bars are statistically significant A. B. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959)

Career Development Items vs. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959) Category 1: Career Development 9. My campus/location provides people with the necessary information and resources to manage their own careers effectively. Total Favorable? Total Unfavorable Total Favorable Differences From Benchmark A 62.36210448 62 17.53546199 20.10243487 18 20 B 59.6858654 60 14.24083805 26.07329798 14* 26* 3 3 0 25 50 75 100 * indicates a statistically significant difference -30-20 -10 0 10 20 30 Red / Green Difference Bars are statistically significant A. B. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959)

Career Development Items vs. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959) Category 1: Career Development 14. I am confident I can achieve my personal career objectives within the UC system. Total Favorable? Total Unfavorable Total Favorable Differences From Benchmark A 60.75084507 61 16.79304787 22.45610792 17 22 B 57.08289719 57 16.89401817 26.02308464 17 26 4 4 0 25 50 75 100 * indicates a statistically significant difference -30-20 -10 0 10 20 30 Red / Green Difference Bars are statistically significant A. B. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959)

Career Development Items vs. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959) Category 1: Career Development 18. My campus/location is doing a good job of planning for management succession. Total Favorable? Total Unfavorable Total Favorable Differences From Benchmark A 35.36107227 27.29233303 27 37.34659431 37 B 38.15513706 29.35010529 32.49475956 29 32* -3-3 0 25 50 75 100 * indicates a statistically significant difference -30-20 -10 0 10 20 30 Red / Green Difference Bars are statistically significant A. B. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959)

ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE

Organizational Change Items vs. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959) Category 5: Organizational Change 5a. Generally, recent major organizational changes across the UC system have been: Planned well Total Favorable? Total Unfavorable Total Favorable Differences From Benchmark A 38.6892019 39 31.98594319 29.32485587 29 B 37.97468328 38 27.74261665 28* 34.28269958 34* 1 1 0 25 50 75 100 * indicates a statistically significant difference -30-20 -10 0 10 20 30 Red / Green Difference Bars are statistically significant A. B. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959)

Organizational Change Items vs. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959) Category 5: Organizational Change 5b. Generally, recent major organizational changes across the UC system have been: Explained well Total Favorable? Total Unfavorable Total Favorable Differences From Benchmark A 38.18873824 26.17079252 26 35.64047 36 B 42.60042191 43* 21.56448174 35.83509541 22* 36-4 -4 * 0 25 50 75 100 * indicates a statistically significant difference -30-20 -10 0 10 20 30 Red / Green Difference Bars are statistically significant A. B. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959)

Organizational Change Items vs. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959) Category 5: Organizational Change 5c. Generally, recent major organizational changes across the UC system have been: Executed well Total Favorable? Total Unfavorable Total Favorable Differences From Benchmark A 34 34.49293873 31.92353016 3233.58353111 34 B 0 25 50 75 100 * indicates a statistically significant difference -30-20 -10 0 10 20 30 Red / Green Difference Bars are statistically significant A. B. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959)

MOST IMPROVED BETWEEN 2015-2012

Benchmarks Summary for Items Category 3: Engagement Benchmarks Total Favorable Total Unfavorable Items A B C D? A. UC OVERALL [W] (N=9,468) B. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959) C. 2014 US UNIVERSITIES STAFF NORM (N=14,560) D. TOWERS WATSON US NATIONAL NORM (N=160,417) Differences in Total Favorable From 3. I feel motivated to go beyond my formal job responsibilities to get the job done. 84 5 11 +1 1 0 n/a -5** 11. Working for the UC system inspires me to do my best work. 73 13 14 +2 2 +7* 7 * n/a 0 15. I am satisfied with my involvement in decisions that affect my work. 66 12 23 +4* 4 * +4 4 +3 3-4** 19. I have the equipment/tools/resources I need to do my job effectively. 78 8 14 +5* 5 * -1 +4* 4 * 2 +2 21. There is usually sufficient staff in my department to handle the workload. 44 12 45-1 +1 1-4** -12** 23. My work schedule allows sufficient flexibility to meet my personal/family needs. 84 4 11 0-2 +1 1 7 * +7* Colored Cells indicate a statistically significant difference

TOP FAVORABLE DIFFERENCES FROM 2012 TO 2015

Top 10 Items vs. UC OVERALL [W] (N=9,468) Top 10 Differences From Benchmark CAREER DEVELOPMENT: My campus/location provides people with the necessary information and resources to manage their own careers effectively. Total Favorable 62 Diff Neutral Midpoint Total Unfavorable +9* 9 * 18 20 Don't Know (Other) IMAGE/BRAND: My campus/location is highly regarded by its employees. 75 +8* 8 * 14 12 ENGAGEMENT: I have the equipment/tools/resources I need to do my job effectively. 78 +5* 5 * 8 14 ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE: Generally, recent major organizational changes across the UC system have been: Planned well 39 +5* 5 * 32 29 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT: I think my performance on the job is evaluated fairly. 78 +4* 4 * 11 11 SUPERVISION: My supervisor gives me regular feedback on my performance. 73 +4* 4 * 7 19 CAREER DEVELOPMENT: There are sufficient opportunities for me to receive training to improve my skills in my current job. 71 +4* 4 * 12 17 ENGAGEMENT: I am satisfied with my involvement in decisions that affect my work. 66 +4* 4 * 12 23 CAREER DEVELOPMENT: My campus/location is doing a good job of planning for management succession. 35 +4* 4 * 27 37 ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE: Generally, recent major organizational changes across the UC system have been: Executed well 34 +4* 4 * 32 34 0 25 50 75 100 * indicates a statistically significant difference

KEY DRIVERS FOR IMPROVEMENT Career Development Organizational Change Performance Management

Bottom 10 Items vs. UC OVERALL [W] (N=9,468) Bottom 10 Differences From Benchmark Total Favorable Diff Neutral Midpoint Total Unfavorable Don't Know (Other) PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT: I feel my campus/location does a good job matching pay to performance. 27-1 12 60 SUPERVISION: Regarding suggestions for change from employees, my supervisor is usually responsive. 72-1 13 15 SUPERVISION: My supervisor communicates effectively. 73-1 9 17 ENGAGEMENT: There is usually sufficient staff in my department to handle the workload. 44-1 12 45 WORKING RELATIONSHIPS: There is good cooperation between staff in my department. SUPERVISION: Please indicate the extent to which you agree with the following statements about your supervisor: Listens carefully to different points of view before coming to conclusions 72 78-1 10 12 0 10 18 IMAGE/BRAND: I am proud to be associated with the UC system. 86 0 8 5 CAREER DEVELOPMENT: I believe I have the opportunity for personal development and growth within the UC system. SUPERVISION: My supervisor keeps me informed about issues that affect me. 73 75 0 9 19 0 11 14 ENGAGEMENT: My work schedule allows sufficient flexibility to meet my personal/family needs. 84 0 4 11 0 25 50 75 100 * indicates a statistically significant difference

ENGAGEMENT

Engagement Items vs. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959) Category 3: Engagement 11. Working for the UC system inspires me to do my best work. Total Favorable? Total Unfavorable Total Favorable Differences From Benchmark A 72.86603563 12.70077741 73 14.4331862 13 14 B 66.17801094 66* 12.35602093 21.46596813 12 21* 7 * 7 0 25 50 75 100 * indicates a statistically significant difference -30-20 -10 0 10 20 30 Red / Green Difference Bars are statistically significant A. B. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959)

Engagement Items vs. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959) Category 3: Engagement 15. I am satisfied with my involvement in decisions that affect my work. Total Favorable? Total Unfavorable Total Favorable Differences From Benchmark A 65.8856217 6611.58072877 22.53364858 12 23 B 61.78947449 62 10.42105293 27.78947353 10 28* 4 4 0 25 50 75 100 * indicates a statistically significant difference -30-20 -10 0 10 20 30 Red / Green Difference Bars are statistically significant A. B. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959)

Engagement Items vs. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959) Category 3: Engagement 19. I have the equipment/tools/resources I need to do my job effectively. Total Favorable? Total Unfavorable Total Favorable Differences From Benchmark A 77.5562045 8.026570959 78 14.41722541 8 14 B 78.33859253 6.834910393 78 14.82649803 7 15-1 -1 0 25 50 75 100 * indicates a statistically significant difference -30-20 -10 0 10 20 30 Red / Green Difference Bars are statistically significant A. B. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959)

Items By Category vs. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959) Category 3: Engagement Total Favorable? Total Unfavorabl e 3. I feel motivated to go beyond my formal A 84 5 11 job responsibilities to get the job done. B 84 5 11 0 Total Favorable Difference From Prior Survey 0 11. Working for the UC system inspires me to A 73 13 14 do my best work. B * 66* * 12 21* 7 * 7 15. I am satisfied with my involvement in A 66 12 23 decisions that affect my work. B 62 * 10 28* 4 4 19. I have the equipment/tools/resources I A 78 8 14 need to do my job effectively. B 78 7 15-1 -1 Legend A. 0 25 50 75 100-30 -20-10 0 10 20 30 * indicates a statistically significant difference Red / Green Difference Bars are statistically significant B. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959)

Engagement Items vs. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959) Category 3: Engagement 3. I feel motivated to go beyond my formal job responsibilities to get the job done. Total Favorable? Total Unfavorable Total Favorable Differences From Benchmark A 83.75585247 5.292866798 84 10.95127978 5 11 B 83.69905853 5.329153538 84 10.97178698 5 11 0 0 0 25 50 75 100 * indicates a statistically significant difference -30-20 -10 0 10 20 30 Red / Green Difference Bars are statistically significant A. B. SAN DIEGO 2012 (N=959)

I HAVE IDEAS TO HELP IMPROVE OUR WORKING ENVIRONMENT. WHERE CAN I GO TO OFFER THEM? The Staff Association is holding a Town Hall for this express purpose! May 19 th, 11:30 1:00 Forum Room 4th Floor, Price Center East *Refreshments and Refreshing Conversation will be available Come out and meet your Staff Association leadership and the leadership for the staff affiliate groups. We all want to meet you!

HOW CAN I GET INVOLVED? http://staffassociation.ucsd.edu https://twitter.com/ucsdstaff https://www.facebook.com/ucsdstaffassociation Contact Us! SAChair@ucsd.edu Billiekai Boughton, Chair: 858-822-5450 Amanda Chavez, Chair-Elect: 858-534-9659 For more information about CUCSA and each Staff Assembly: http://cucsa.ucr.edu/

THANK YOU!